Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 13;5:14994. doi: 10.1038/srep14994

Functional microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in granulosa cells from women with polycystic ovary syndrome related to MAPK/ERK signaling

Chen-Wei Lan 1,2, Mei-Jou Chen 2, Kang-Yu Tai 4, Danny CW Yu 2, Yu-Chieh Yang 2, Pey-Shynan Jan 2, Yu-Shih Yang 2, Hsin-Fu Chen 1,2,3,a, Hong-Nerng Ho 1,2,3,b
PMCID: PMC4602237  PMID: 26459919

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age. Although its aetiology and pathogenesis remain unclear, recent studies suggest that the dysfunction of granulosa cells may partly be responsible. This study aimed to use cDNA microarray technology to compare granulosa cell gene expression profiles in women with and without PCOS to identify genes that may be aetiologically implicated in the pathogenesis of PCOS. The study cohort included 12 women undergoing in vitro fertilization, six with PCOS and six without PCOS. Differential gene expression profiles were classified by post-analyses of microarray data, followed by western blot analyses to confirm the microarray data of selected genes. In total, 243 genes were differentially expressed (125 upregulated and 118 downregulated) between the PCOS and non-PCOS granulosa cells. These genes are involved in reproductive system development, amino acid metabolism and cellular development and proliferation. Comparative analysis revealed genes involved in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) signaling pathways. Western blot analyses confirmed that mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 4 and phospho-ERK1/2 were decreased in PCOS granulosa cells. This study identified candidate genes involved in MAPK/ERK signaling pathways that may influence the function of granulosa cells in PCOS.


Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common heterogeneous endocrinopathy characterised by hyperandrogenemia (HA), arrested ovarian follicle development, menstrual irregularity and polycystic ovaries that results in anovulation and infertility in women of reproductive age1,2,3. Furthermore, PCOS is a leading cause of several other health problems in women, including menstrual dysfunction, hirsutism, acne, obesity, and metabolic syndrome4,5,6,7,8. Although evidence suggests that PCOS has a complex aetiology with a genetic basis, its exact genetic aetiology remains unclear9,10.

Granulosa cells are important in ovarian folliculogenesis as they provide a suitable microenvironment for follicular development and oocyte maturation. In response to pituitary gonadotropin secretion, granulosa cells upregulate the expression of a variety of genes that encode the components of steroidogenic pathways involved in estrogen biosynthesis11. Recent studies have indicated that in women with PCOS, granulosa cell dysfunction may contribute to abnormal folliculogenesis, excess production of intraovarian androgens and/or increased circulating anti-Müllerian hormone levels, although the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated12,13,14,15,16,17. Therefore, it is clinically important to explore the mechanisms underlying the dysfunction of granulosa cells in women with PCOS.

DNA microarray technology is a suitable modality to examine changes in global gene expression among granulosa cells in PCOS and may aid in the identification of novel candidate genes that contribute to the aetiology of PCOS. Previous studies comparing gene expression arrays in theca cells, ovarian cells, oocytes, cumulus cells and granulosa cells between women with PCOS and without PCOS have identified several candidate pathways underlying differential gene expression among various cell types18,19,20,21,22,23,24. However, to the best of our knowledge, gene expression profiles and identification of mechanisms in granulosa-lutein cells isolated from normal-weight Asian women with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) have not yet been reported22.

Therefore, we compared the gene expression profiles of non-PCOS and PCOS granulosa cells from preovulatory follicles using Affymetrix® microarray chips to assess global changes in granulosa cell gene expression profiles and alterations in genetic networks, signal transduction, transcription/translation and/or metabolic pathways critical to PCOS granulosa cell phenotypes that may impact oocyte maturation and follicular development.

Materials and Methods

Patient selection and ethical statement

All study participants were women undergoing IVF at the Center for Reproduction at the National Taiwan University Hospital (Taipei City, Taiwan). A diagnosis of PCOS was based on the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria3: (I) chronic oligo-ovulation and/or anovulation (cycle lengths >35 days); (II) biochemical HA (serum total testosterone levels ≧0.8 ng/mL) and/or clinical HA, including hirsutism, acne and/or alopecia; and (III) polycystic ovaries on ultrasound. PCOS was defined when at least two of these three features were present. We enrolled 12 women in this study (Table 1), six with PCOS (PCOS group) and six without PCOS (non-PCOS group) with male factor infertility as the control group. Among the six women in the PCOS group, six had chronic oligo-ovulation (6/6), three had biochemical HA (3/6), six had clinical HA (6/6) and all six had polycystic ovaries (6/6). Each of the six women with PCOS satisfied all three Rotterdam criteria. The average patient age was 34 years (range, 31–37 years). A luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone (LH/FSH) ratio of >1 was accepted as the supplemental biochemical evidence of PCOS. All six women with PCOS had an LH/FSH ratio of >1. In this study, we recruited only women with a normal body mass index (BMI) of 19–24 kg/m2 to minimize the effects of obesity and fasting blood glucose (glucose AC, 70–100 mg/dL). The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital (approval no.: NTUH-REC No.: 201212125RIND) and conducted in accordance with approved institutional guidelines. All participants provided signed informed consent.

Table 1. Clinical parameters in normoovulatory controls and patients with PCOS.

  Normal (n = 6) PCOS (n = 6) Pvalue
Mean (±S.D.) Mean (±S.D.)
Age (yr) 34.8 (±2.9) 34.3 (±3.3) 0.712
BMI (kg/m2) 20.6 (±1.8) 20.0 (±1.0) 0.675
Menstrual cycle length 28.3 (±0.8) 43.2 (±13.0) 0.002**
E2 (pg/mL) 40.7 (±20.7) 32.2 (±18.7) 0.305
LH (mIU/mL) 4.5 (±3.5) 6.2 (±2.6) 0.368
FSH (mIU/mL) 7.9 (±4.9) 5.0 (±1.9) 0.305
LH/FSH (mIU/mL) 0.5 (±0.1) 1.3 (±0.5) 0.009**
Number of aspired follicles 9.5 (±0.5) 31.2 (±3.9) 0.002**
Total testosterone (ng/mL) 0.3 (±0.1) 1.0 (±0.6) 0.015*
Glucose AC (mg/dL) 84.7 (±4.3) 82.8 (±9.0) 0.240
Total FSH dose (IU) 1800.0 (±158.1) 1579.2 (±386.1) 0.355

Significance was tested using Mann-Whitney U test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Normal vs. PCOS subjects. BMI, Body mass index. E2, Estradiol.

Assays

After overnight fasting, venous blood samples were collected in the early follicular phase from all subjects, allowed to clot for 30 min and then centrifuged at 2500 rpm for approximately 10 min to obtain serum. Serum total testosterone levels [detectable range (DR): 0.03–14.4 ng/mL] were measured using radioimmunoassay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX, USA)25. The concentration of fasting blood glucose (glucose AC, DR: 10–800 mg/dL), FSH (DR: 0.1–120 mIU/mL), LH (DR: 0.1–100 mIU/mL) and oestradiol (E2, DR: 20–900 pg/mL) were measured as described previously25,26,27.

Ovarian stimulation, granulosa cell collection and RNA extraction

During ovarian stimulation, the dose of gonadotropin (Merck Serono S.A., Geneva, Switzerland) was adjusted for each individual patient according to FSH levels, serum E2 concentrations and growth and number of follicles. Follicular fluid was aspirated and pooled from small antral follicles (4–8 mm in diameter) visible on ultrasonography during the retrieval of transvaginal oocytes for IVF. The granulosa cells were isolated and prepared from follicular aspirates after the removal of oocytes. The samples were then centrifuged at 400 × g for 10 min to separate the fluid from cells. The cell pellets were resuspended in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; GIBCO®; Invitrogen Life Technologies GibcoWaltham, MA, USA), layered on 50% Ficoll–Paque™ density gradient media (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and then centrifuged at 400 × for 30 min to remove maximum red blood cells. The granulosa cells at the interface were collected and washed with DPBS. Total RNA was extracted from individual patient samples using the RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and then treated with deoxyribonuclease. The concentration of isolated RNA was determined using a NanoDrop® ND-100 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, LLC, Wilmington, DE, USA). The RNA extracts were stored at −80 °C until all samples were collected. The quality and integrity of RNA samples were analyzed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Microarray hybridization analysis

Affymetrix® Gene Chip Human Genome Gene 1.0 ST microarray chips (Affymetrix®, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were hybridized at the National Health Research Institutes Microarray Core Facility (Miaoli County, Taiwan). Briefly, total RNA was reverse transcribed into double-stranded cDNA using an oligo24 primer containing a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. Single-stranded cDNA labeled with biotinylated nucleotides in the sense direction were generated from cRNA and used for array hybridization. The arrays were washed and stained using the Affymetrix® Fluidics Station 450 and then scanned using the Affymetrix® GeneArray 3000 7 G scanner to generate fluorescent images. Cell intensity data (CEL files) were generated using Affymetrix® GeneChip® Command Console® software.

Microarray data annotation and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA)

Data were normalized using quantile normalization methods28. A list of differentially expressed genes was generated by Linear Models for Microarray (limma29 packages in the R platform) data analysis, and their corrected P values were calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg method30 (i.e. false discovery rate) for the non-PCOS group compared with the PCOS group and uploaded to the IPA Ingenuity System (http://www.ingenuity.com) to identify gene networks. Gene networks were used to identify biologic functions, molecular processes, disorders and pathways of genes identified by Limma data analysis.

Protein extraction and western blot analyses

Total protein was extracted from an additional three non-PCOS granulosa cells and three PCOS granulosa cells, and 20 μg of protein per lane was loaded and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes and blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (Gibco). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with one of the following primary antibodies: phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK; diluted 1:500), ERK (diluted 1:1000), mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 4 (MAP3K4; diluted 1:500), or glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; diluted 1:5000) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Next, PVDF membranes were incubated for 60 min at room temperature with secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and then immune complexes were detected by chemiluminescence using a western blotting analysis system (NENTM Life Science, Boston, MA, USA). Relative protein levels per sample were then normalized to GAPDH signals.

Statistical analysis

Clinical features of interest were selected as dependent variables. The Mann–Whitney U test, Student’s t-test and paired t-test of variance were used where appropriate for statistical analyses. Data from at least three independent measurements are presented as means ± standard deviation of the mean (SEM). The SYSTAT statistical graphics software package (SYSTAT Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for analysis, and a probability (P) value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The clinical and hormonal characteristics of patients with and without PCOS

The granulosa cells were isolated from six women without PCOS and six women with PCOS undergoing IVF. The clinical and biochemical characteristics of study participants are listed in Table 1. There were no differences between the groups in regard to age; mean BMI; basal FSH, LH and E2 levels; glucose AC; duration of ovarian stimulation or total FSH dose. The mean menstrual cycle length, LH/FSH ratio, number of aspirated follicles and total testosterone levels were significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the non-PCOS group.

Profiles of differentially expressed genes

All 12 samples were analyzed to select genes that were significantly upregulated or downregulated. A total of 243 genes were differentially expressed in the granulosa cells from the non-PCOS group compared with those from the PCOS group (Supplemental information 1). Differentially expressed genes were visualized by hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (Fig. 1A,B). Compared with the non-PCOS group, 118 genes were significantly downregulated and 125 were significantly upregulated in the PCOS group. The 10 most upregulated and downregulated genes in the non-PCOS group compared with the PCOS group are listed in Table 2.

Figure 1. Poly component analysis and hierarchical cluster of differentially expressed genes in granulosa cells of the non-PCOS controls (n = 6) vs. patients with PCOS (n = 6).

Figure 1

(A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of entire gene expression levels of all samples. (B) Hierarchical cluster analysis performed on the profiles of 243 differentially expressed genes.

Table 2. The top ten upregulated and downregulated genes in granulosa cells of normal group compared with PCOS group.

Genes Symbol Genes Name log fold change adj P value
Upregulated
 AOX1 aldehyde oxidase 1 1.475 0.001813**
 C1orf54 chromosome 1 open reading frame 54 1.311 0.002377**
 SNORD59A small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 59A 1.257 0.002768**
 TRIM22 tripartite motif-containing 22 1.212 0.002481**
 RN7SK RNA, 7SK small nuclear 1.180 0.001813**
 ANKRD36B ankyrin repeat domain 36B 1.157 0.001583**
 ENPP5 ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 5 1.115 0.002160**
 SLC25A30 solute carrier family 25, member 30 1.085 0.002398**
 SNORD21 small nucleolar RNA, C/D box21 1.028 0.001583**
 ALPK1 alpha-kinase 1 1.008 0.001583**
Downregulated
 DHX16 DEAH box polypeptide 16 −0.762 0.004345**
 FBXO5 F-box protein 5 −0.709 0.013218*
 OR14C36 olfactory receptor, family 14, subfamily C,member 36 −0.627 0.007862**
 PCOTH prostate collagen triple helix −0.613 0.001583**
 RPL4 ribosomal protein L4 −0.563 0.003660**
BCL2L15 BCL2-like15 −0.552 0.002969**
 OR52E8 olfactory receptor, family 52, subfamily E, member 8 −0.453 0.014957*
 GTF2H1 general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 1 −0.430 0.025261*
 OR5A2 olfactory receptor, family 5, subfamily A, member 2 −0.429 0.011000*
 PTH2R parathyroid hormone 2 receptor −0.403 0.011824*

The adjusted P values were shown by False Discovery Rate (FDR) calculation based on the Benjamini-Hochberg method30. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Function, network and signal transduction pathways with significantly altered gene expression profiles in granulosa cells from women with PCOS

The functional differences between the two groups were used to construct a differential gene–protein interaction network of 243 differentially expressed genes identified in granulosa cells. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis suggested that these genes were typically involved in MAPK signaling, VEGF signaling, androgen and estrogen metabolism and drug metabolism (Fig. 2). Of a total of eight MAPK signaling pathway genes that were identified in the non-PCOS granulosa cells, four were comparatively upregulated and four downregulated compared with the PCOS granulosa cells (Fig. 2A). In the PCOS group, we also identified three androgen and estrogen metabolism-related genes that were downregulated (Fig. 2B), five drug metabolism-related genes (one upregulated and four downregulated; Fig. 2C) and four VEGF signaling pathway genes (two upregulated and two downregulated; Fig. 2D). In addition, IPA analysis revealed involvement in the following cellular functions: reproductive system development and function; amino acid metabolism; cell morphology; hereditary disorder; cell-to-cell signaling and interaction; cellular development and proliferation; cell cycle and DNA replication, recombination and repair. The top network represented in differentially expressed genes was the reproductive system development and function and amino acid metabolism network (score = 38) in the non-PCOS granulosa cells compared with the PCOS granulosa cells. The reproductive system development and function network demonstrated high representation of the following genes (Fig. 3): sexual reproduction genes, phospholipase A2, group IVA (cytosolic, calcium-dependent, PLA2G4A), steroid-5-alpha-reductase, alpha polypeptide 2 (3-oxo-5 alpha-steroid delta 4-dehydrogenase alpha 2, SRD5A2), thymidine kinase 1, soluble TK1 and growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) as well as reproduction genes involved in the MAPK/ERK pathway. In addition, this reproductive system development and function network was related by steroidogenic genes, LH, FSH, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and low-density lipoprotein (Fig. 3).

Figure 2. Functional and mechanism analysis of microarray data indicated differential expression according to the Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) for the non-PCOS controls (n = 6) vs. patients PCOS (n = 6).

Figure 2

(A) Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway, (B) androgen and estrogen metabolism, (C) drug metabolism, and (D) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway in the granulosa cells. Black bars represent genes with greater expression in the non-PCOS controls; white bars represent genes with greater expression in PCOS.

Figure 3. Reproduction system network of genes that were either upregulated or downregulated in the non-PCOS compared with PCOS granulosa cells.

Figure 3

Genes are arranged into 4 horizontal compartments (nucleus, cytoplasm, plasma membrane, and extracellular space). The differences in color intensity of the molecules show the higher or lower expression.

Validation of microarray data by western blot analysis: MAP3K4 expression and ERK1/2 phosphorylation was reduced in the PCOS granulosa cells

In this study, we coupled the KEGG and IPA data to identify statistically significant differences in MAPK/ERK signaling between the non-PCOS and PCOS granulosa cells. To further validate whether there were differences at the protein level, we compared MAP3K4 expression in granulosa cells obtained from three other independent patients from each group by western blot analysis and observed a 30% reduction in MAP3K4 expression in the PCOS granulosa cells (Fig. 4A). The most widely studied MAPK pathway is the ERK cascade, of which ERK1 and ERK2 form the central components and have been demonstrated to be associated with steroidogenesis in granulosa cells31,32. Furthermore, we examined the downstream molecular mechanisms of both p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 by western blot analysis in three independent patients each from the non-PCOS and PCOS groups. Our analysis showed that p-ERK1/2 was comparatively decreased in the PCOS granulosa cells (Fig. 4B). A comparison of MAP3K4 and p-ERK1/2 revealed that both were reduced in the PCOS granulosa cells compared with the non-PCOS granulosa cells. These results concur with the data obtained by the microarray assay at the protein level.

Figure 4. The activation of MAP3K4 and p-ERK1/2 was decreased in PCOS granulosa cells when compared with the non-PCOS granulosa cells.

Figure 4

Western blot analysis of the MAP3K4 protein (A) and the p-ERK1/2 protein (B) in the non-PCOS granulosa cells and PCOS granulosa cells. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), internal control for quantitation. Bar chart represents the quantitation of protein levels. *P < 0.05. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SD) of data from ≥3 independent experiments. In (A,B) relevant parts of Western blot images were cropped from full-length blots shown in Fig. S1.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to use DNA microarray data to identify differentially expressed genes in the granulosa cells of women with and without PCOS to provide novel information for the further study of associated disease mechanisms and also to bring about advancement in disease treatment. These microarray profiles indicated that the levels of activated MAP3K4 and p-ERK1/2 were reduced in the PCOS granulosa cells, which are potentially correlated with reproduction. These findings provide further evidence that the MAPK signaling pathway plays an important role in the pathogenesis of PCOS. Furthermore, these differentially expressed genes were also involved in androgen and estrogen metabolism, drug metabolism and VEGF signaling.

A limitation to this genetic study of PCOS was the relatively small number of subjects, which was due to the limited clinical access to patient tissues. PCOS is a genetically complex heterogeneous endocrinopathy affecting 5%–10% of reproductive age women. The strength of this study was that PCOS was assessed only among women of reproductive age (average age, 34 years) who were undergoing IVF. It was particularly difficult to collect sufficiently large cohorts of such patients because our recruitment of women with PCOS was based on the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria and only those with a normal BMI of 19–24 kg/m2 and glucose AC level of 70–100 mg/dL were included to minimize the effects of obesity and insulin resistance.

We used microarray analysis, IPA and KEGG data to identify several important pathways, biological function networks and groups of significant candidate PCOS genes. We also compared pathways to identify common, unique and unions of pathway participants by calculating and comparing the significance of various potential genes between our cases and controls. Although differences in gene expression profiles were fairly small, the significance fulfils the criteria of the IPA software for further comprehensive research of these unique genes.

Among the 10 most highly differentially expressed genes detected in this study, some were previously shown to be associated with PCOS, including aldehyde oxidase 1, DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 16, chromosome 1 open reading frame 54 and F-box protein 519,21,33,34. The 7SK small nuclear RNA is reportedly expressed in male testes and is also highly expressed in female ovaries35. In addition, we observed that B-cell lymphoma 2-like 15 (BCL2L15), which reportedly plays important roles in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation36, was among the top upregulated genes. Notably, the BCL2 family proteins are the key regulators of apoptotic processes that govern human oocyte development and survival36,37. Therefore, we propose that the observed low levels of BCL2L15 in the PCOS granulosa cells compared with those in the non-PCOS granulosa cells may be involved in an increased risk of PCOS.

Our results also indicated that a group of genes that were upregulated or downregulated in the PCOS granulosa cells were involved in the reproductive system development and function. These genes included the transcription regulators, T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia 1 and zinc finger and BTB domain containing 17; the transporters, neuroglobin and alpha-2-glycoprotein 1and the zinc-binding proteins, PLA2G4A, SRD5A2, TK1, GDF9, myeloperoxidase, transmembrane receptor lymphocyte-activation gene 3 and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 1. The PLA2G4A enzyme is stimulated by the preovulatory LH/hCG surge in granulosa cells of ovulatory follicles38. SRD5A2 (enzyme 5α-reductase) plays an important role in the steroid metabolism cascade to convert testosterone and cortisol to dihydrotestosterone and dihydrocortisol, respectively39. Previous research has indicated that decreased SRD5A2 activity is associated with the pathogenesis of PCOS, even in women with normal weight. Therefore, an increase in the activity of this enzyme might decrease cortisol production with a consequent increase in androgen levels. Together, these observations suggest that SRD5A2 may influence ovarian function and promote the symptoms of HA in PCOS, such as hirsutism, acne and alopecia40,41. The abnormal expression of the enzyme TK is significantly associated with the incidence of PCOS42. GDF9 is an oocyte-specific growth factor that plays key roles in oocyte–granulosa cell communication during folliculogenesis43, and its dysregulation may contribute to aberrant folliculogenesis in PCOS44. In addition, these genes regulate reproductive development and function via several signaling pathways, including MAPK/ERK, Akt, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and transforming growth factor beta. The MAPK/ERK pathway consists of a chain of cell proteins that facilitate signal transduction from the cytosol to the nucleus for the regulation of cell survival, proliferation and differentiation through phosphorylation cascades45,46. Previous studies have demonstrated that alternative MAPK/ERK signaling pathways are associated with FSH-induced steroid biosynthesis in granulosa cells47,48. In addition, other studies have determined that the abnormal activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in different tissues may contribute to defects observed in metabolic signaling and excessive ovarian androgen production in women with PCOS49,50. Our microarray data showed that MAP3K4 was downregulated in the PCOS granulosa cells compared with the non-PCOS granulosa cells. IPA analysis revealed that the top reproductive system development and function network (score = 38) was correlated with the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. On the basis of these results, we further investigated MAP3K4 signaling and determined that downstream p-ERK1/2 expression was decreased in the PCOS granulosa cells at the protein level. MAP3K4 is an MAPK that activates the p38 MAPK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathways in embryonic gonadal somatic cells and regulates embryonic gonadal activity51,52. This study is the first to indicate an association of MAP3K4 activation with PCOS and to show that it is involved in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Importantly, the microarray gene expression profiles identified in this study give further insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of PCOS. However, future studies will be required to clarify the interaction of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathways in the granulosa cell pathophysiology in PCOS.

In conclusion, we identified several genes that were differentially expressed between non-PCOS and PCOS granulosa cells. The present data show for the first time that expression of the novel player MAP3K4 was decreased in the PCOS granulosa cells and participated in the MAPK/ERK signal transduction pathway. These differentially expressed genes are involved in various biological functions, particularly reproduction and development, and provide a mechanism through which granulosa cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of PCOS. These results will help to further clarify the molecular basis and the functional significance of several novel genes involved in the pathogenesis of PCOS.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lan, C.-W. et al. Functional microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in granulosa cells from women with polycystic ovary syndrome related to MAPK/ERK signaling. Sci. Rep. 5, 14994; doi: 10.1038/srep14994 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep14994-s1.pdf (208.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Dataset 1
srep14994-s2.xls (247.5KB, xls)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC100-2321-B-002-072-, NSC 102-232-B-002-030-, NSC 102-2321-B-002-093-MY3) and NTU Aim for Top University Program (102R7559-4). Microarray services were supported by Microarray Core Laboratory of the Core Instrument Center, National Health Research Institutes.

Footnotes

Author Contributions C.W.L. performed experiments and wrote the paper; M.J.C. and Y.C.Y. provided the samples and contributed in manuscript writing; K.Y.T. and D.C.Y. analyzed the microarray data; P.S.J. and D.C.Y. performed experiments and collected data; and Y.S.Y., H.F.C. and H.N.H. obtained the funding and designed the research. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81, 19–25 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 333, 853–861 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 19, 41–47 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehrmann D. A. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 352, 1223–1236 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Norman R. J., Dewailly D., Legro R. S. & Hickey T. E. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet 370, 685–697 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehrmann D. A. et al. Prevalence and predictors of the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 48–53 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen M. J. et al. Hyperandrogenemia Is Independently Associated with Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase Activity in Young Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocr Metab 95, 3332–3341 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen M. J. et al. Relationship between androgen levels and blood pressure in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hypertension 49, 1442–1447 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Diamanti-Kandarakis E. & Piperi C. Genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome: searching for the way out of the labyrinth. Hum Reprod Update 11, 631–643 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barthelmess E. K. & Naz R. K. Polycystic ovary syndrome: current status and future perspective. Frontiers in bioscience 6, 104–119 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Barnes R. B., Rosenfield R. L., Namnoum A. & Layman L. C. Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone on ovarian androgen production in a woman with isolated follicle-stimulating hormone deficiency. N Engl J Med 343, 1197–1198 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Das M. et al. Granulosa cell survival and proliferation are altered in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93, 881–887 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Magoffin D. A. & Weitsman S. R. Insulin-like growth factor-I regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression and LH-stimulated signal transduction in rat ovarian theca-interstitial cells. Biol Reprod 51, 766–775 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Udoff L. & Adashi E. Y. Polycystic ovarian disease: a new look at an old subject. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7, 340–343 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pellatt L. et al. Granulosa cell production of anti-Mullerian hormone is increased in polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92, 240–245 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Homburg R. et al. The relationship of serum anti-Mullerian hormone with polycystic ovarian morphology and polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 28, 1077–1083 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Homburg R. & Crawford G. The role of AMH in anovulation associated with PCOS: a hypothesis. Hum Reprod 29, 1117–1121 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wood J. R. et al. The molecular phenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) theca cells and new candidate PCOS genes defined by microarray analysis. J Biol Chem 278, 26380–26390 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Diao F. Y. et al. The molecular characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) ovary defined by human ovary cDNA microarray. J Mol Endocrinol 33, 59–72 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wood J. R., Dumesic D. A., Abbott D. H. & Strauss J. F. 3rd. Molecular abnormalities in oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome revealed by microarray analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92, 705–713 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kenigsberg S. et al. Gene expression microarray profiles of cumulus cells in lean and overweight-obese polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Mol Hum Reprod 15, 89–103 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaur S. et al. Differential gene expression in granulosa cells from polycystic ovary syndrome patients with and without insulin resistance: identification of susceptibility gene sets through network analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, E2016–2021 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Coskun S. et al. Gene expression profiling of granulosa cells from PCOS patients following varying doses of human chorionic gonadotropin. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 30, 341–352 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmidt J. et al. Differential expression of inflammation-related genes in the ovarian stroma and granulosa cells of PCOS women. Mol Hum Reprod 20, 49–58 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang C. C. et al. Symptom patterns and phenotypic subgrouping of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: association between endocrine characteristics and metabolic aberrations. Hum Reprod 30, 937–946 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen M. J. et al. Myostatin and its association with abdominal obesity, androgen and follistatin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 27, 2476–2483 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen M. J. et al. The relationship between anti-Mullerian hormone, androgen and insulin resistance on the number of antral follicles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Human Reproduction 23, 952–957 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bolstad B. M., Irizarry R. A., Astrand M. & Speed T. P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185–193 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smyth G. K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3, Article3 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Benjamini Y. et al. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  31. Seto-Young D., Zajac J., Liu H. C., Rosenwaks Z. & Poretsky L. The role of mitogen-activated protein kinase in insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) signaling cascades for progesterone and IGF-binding protein-1 production in human granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88, 3385–3391 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Manna P. R. & Stocco D. M. The role of specific mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades in the regulation of steroidogenesis. Journal of signal transduction 2011, 821615 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Corton M. et al. Differential gene expression profile in omental adipose tissue in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92, 328–337 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Skov V. et al. Reduced expression of nuclear-encoded genes involved in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle of insulin-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes 56, 2349–2355 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jameson S. A. et al. Temporal transcriptional profiling of somatic and germ cells reveals biased lineage priming of sexual fate in the fetal mouse gonad. PLoS Genet 8, e1002575 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Boumela I. et al. Involvement of BCL2 family members in the regulation of human oocyte and early embryo survival and death: gene expression and beyond. Reproduction 141, 549–561 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Depalo R. et al. Evidence of apoptosis in human primordial and primary follicles. Hum Reprod 18, 2678–2682 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Diouf M. N. et al. Expression of phospholipase A2 group IVA (PLA2G4A) is upregulated by human chorionic gonadotropin in bovine granulosa cells of ovulatory follicles. Biol Reprod 74, 1096–1103 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jakimiuk A. J., Weitsman S. R. & Magoffin D. A. 5alpha-reductase activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84, 2414–2418 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Goodarzi M. O. et al. Variants in the 5alpha-reductase type 1 and type 2 genes are associated with polycystic ovary syndrome and the severity of hirsutism in affected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 4085–4091 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Graupp M., Wehr E., Schweighofer N., Pieber T. R. & Obermayer-Pietsch B. Association of genetic variants in the two isoforms of 5alpha-reductase, SRD5A1 and SRD5A2, in lean patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 157, 175–179 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim J. Y. et al. Transcriptional profiling with a pathway-oriented analysis identifies dysregulated molecular phenotypes in the endometrium of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94, 1416–1426 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McGrath S. A., Esquela A. F. & Lee S. J. Oocyte-specific expression of growth/differentiation factor-9. Mol Endocrinol 9, 131–136 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Teixeira Filho F. L. et al. Aberrant expression of growth differentiation factor-9 in oocytes of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87, 1337–1344 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Whitmarsh A. J. & Davis R. J. Transcription factor AP-1 regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways. J Mol Med (Berl) 74, 589–607 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vossler M. R. et al. cAMP activates MAP kinase and Elk-1 through a B-Raf- and Rap1-dependent pathway. Cell 89, 73–82 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Das S. et al. A stimulatory role of cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate in follicle-stimulating hormone-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in rat ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 137, 967–974 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tajima K. et al. Down-regulation of steroidogenic response to gonadotropins in human and rat preovulatory granulosa cells involves mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and modulation of DAX-1 and steroidogenic factor-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88, 2288–2299 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nelson-Degrave V. L. et al. Alterations in mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase and extracellular regulated kinase signaling in theca cells contribute to excessive androgen production in polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Endocrinol 19, 379–390 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Corbould A., Zhao H., Mirzoeva S., Aird F. & Dunaif A. Enhanced mitogenic signaling in skeletal muscle of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes 55, 751–759 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Bogani D. et al. Loss of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 4 (MAP3K4) reveals a requirement for MAPK signalling in mouse sex determination. PLoS Biol 7, e1000196 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Warr N. et al. Gadd45gamma and Map3k4 interactions regulate mouse testis determination via p38 MAPK-mediated control of Sry expression. Dev Cell 23, 1020–1031 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep14994-s1.pdf (208.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Dataset 1
srep14994-s2.xls (247.5KB, xls)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES