Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of 5 Image Sets of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Detecting First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Defects Compared With Positron Emission Tomography

In the article “Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of 5 Image Sets of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Detecting First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Defects Compared With Positron Emission Tomography”¹, the authors did not list their funding. The funding line should read as follows:

“This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 303-01-001-0018).”

The article has been corrected online.