Abstract
Aortic pseudoaneurysm formation subsequent to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal cancer patient with esophageal metallic stent insertion is a rare condition.
A 52-year-old man with esophageal cancer, cT4N1M0, stage IIIC, was treated with concurrent weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and 5-Fluorouracil (500 mg/m2) as well as radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) for 6 weeks. An esophageal metallic stent was inserted for dysphagia 1 week after initiation of CCRT. During the treatment regimen, the platelet count dropped to less than 200 × 103 /μL. One month after the completion of CCRT, chest CT revealed the presence of an aortic pseudoaneurysm as well as aortoesophageal fistulas. A thoracic aortic endografting was performed and the patient responded well to surgery. However, the patient died 2 months later due to a nosocomial infection.
Multimodality treatment for esophageal cancer comprising cisplatin-based CCRT and esophageal metallic stent placement near a great vessel may increase the risk of pseudoaneurysm formation.
INTRODUCTION
Treatment options for patients with esophageal cancer and malignant dysphagia include endoluminal stenting, surgery, radiotherapy, brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy (concurrent chemoradiotherapy, CCRT).1,2 Eldeeb and El-Hadaad3 showed that radiotherapy combined with stenting offers a survival advantage. However, metallic stents have been shown to cause irradiation dose perturbation between the stent and surrounding tissues, resulting in intimal thickening, proteoglycan deposition and increased inflammatory cell content, thereby increasing the risk of vascular disease development in cancer patients who undergo RT.4,5
Cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) are reported to be the most active chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with esophageal cancer.6 Both drugs are radiosensitizors that enhance the cytotoxic effect of irradiation.7,8 Additionally, they also cause the damage of the arterial endothelium.9,10
Aortic arch pseudoaneurysm is a rare condition but carries a high risk of rupture. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy caused aortic fistula and related to sudden death for esophageal carcinoma had been reported.11 However, pseudoaneurysm development as a result of intraluminal stenting and CCRT in patients with esophageal cancer has never been reported. Herein, we present a case of aortic pseudoaneurysm development in a patient who underwent CCRT for esophageal cancer and metallic stent placement for cancer-induced dysphagia.
CASE REPORT
A 52-year-old man, with history of hypertension, was diagnosed with stage IIIC (cT4N1M0, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th Edition) squamous cell carcinoma at the middle third of the esophagus (Figures 1A and 2) underwent neoadjuvant CCRT comprising concurrent weekly CDDP (30 mg/m2) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2) as well as radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) for 6 weeks (Figure 3). The regimen in the clinical trial of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9781) was 4-weekly schedule of chemotherapy.6 However, the regimen would be modified to be weekly regimen12 for patients who could not be treated in hospitalization or with poor compliance. Therefore, 4-weekly and weekly schedule both were the standard CCRT protocols in our hospital for esophageal cancer patients. Retrospective data were collected with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (FEMH-IRB-103174-C). Approximately 1 week after beginning the CCRT regimen, however, the patient reported having difficulty swallowing semi-liquid food. A WallFlex™ esophageal stent (18 mm × 123 mm, Boston Scientific Corporation, MA) with metallic radiopaque material that is formed into a cylindrical mesh and was partially covered with a translucent silicone polymer to restrict tumor ingrowth through the wire mesh. After the stent was inserted, the CCRT regimen was continued. Platelet count at the time of stent insertion was 234 × 103/μL. In the following weeks, the platelet counts ranged from 91 × 103 to 153 × 103/μL. One month after completion of the CCRT regimen, histopathologic analysis of biopsy specimens of the esophageal tumor revealed inflammation with ulceration change (Figure 1B) and positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) showed a residual esophageal tumor and persistently enlarged lymph nodes with intact aortic vessel (Figure 4A). However, a few days after the PET-CT study the patient developed midthoracic pain and a hemorrhagic cough. Chest CT at the emergency department revealed a pseudoaneurysm arising from the medial aspect of the proximal descending aorta (Figure 4B). Massive hematemesis was subsequently noted. Emergency surgery was performed to repair the pseudoaneurysm. During the surgery, aorto-esophageal fistulas with active bleeding located about 2 cm distal to the left subclavian artery orifice were noted. Aortography revealed no evidence of rupture at the descending aorta. A thoracic aortic endografting with an aortic stent (8.7 cm in length) was performed and the patient responded well to surgery. One month later, he received adjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP (70 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2) for residual esophageal cancer (Figure 4A). However, the patient developed symptoms of fever and cough with leukocytosis. The chest X-ray revealed increased infiltrations over left lower lung. Hospital-acquired pneumonia was impressed, and empirical antibiotics were prescribed firstly. The culture of sputum and blood were negative findings, respectively. Unfortunately, progressive pneumonia with septic shock and respiratory failure was noted even through aggressive treatment. Patient expired 2 months after the thoracic aortic endografting. Autopsy was suggested. However, patient's families want to maintain the patient's body completely without surgery procedure especially after patient expired. To obey the wish of family, autopsy was not conducted for determining the reason of the patient's death.
FIGURE 1.

(A) Histopathologic analysis revealed predominantly small blue round cells with invasive nests that had grown beyond the mucosa (hematoxylin and eosin stain, magnification ×100), findings suggestive of squamous cell carcinoma. (B) Representative hematoxylin eosin staining after chemoradiation therapy (magnification ×100). Note the large number of leukocytes, the marked accumulation of eosinophilic nucleoli, mixed inflammation, and debris in the mucosal layer.
FIGURE 2.

Chest computed tomography (CT) shows an esophageal tumor with obstruction at the middle third portion of the esophagus invading the adventitia. Also note the enlarged lymph node between the esophagus and the distal trachea.
FIGURE 3.

The dose distribution in the tumor and surrounding tissues. The high-dose regions with radiation dose of 53.2 Gy are adjacent to the wall of the aorta.
FIGURE 4.

(A) Follow-up positron emission tomography scan 1 month after the completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy revealed a residual esophageal tumor and enlarged lymph nodes with intact aortic vessel. (B) Chest CT shows a pseudoaneurysm arising from the medial aspect of the proximal descending aorta.
DISCUSSION
A pseudoaneurysm is an outpouching of a vessel involving a defect of the tunica intima and media that contains a hematoma.13 Numerous causes of pseudoaneurysm formation have been reported, including infection, traumatic reaction, iatrogenic injury, suture dehiscence or loosening, infiltrating neoplasms, tissue necrosis, and a low platelet count (<200 × 103 /μL).14–16
Radiotherapy is a well-known cause of vascular disease especially when vessels are exposed to radiation doses ranging from 25 to 40 Gy.17 In our patient, the aortic pseudoaneurysm developed in a region that received a total radiation dose of 53.2 Gy (Figures 3 and 4B). The metallic stent irradiated that could result in an overdose of 14% to 21% at a depth of 0.5 mm in the esophageal wall.18 Nevertheless, the dose perturbation caused by the backscatter of WallFlex™ esophageal stent ranges from 6% to 13%,4 resulting in an effective dose of 56.5–60.3 Gy for the patient reported here. These influences might contribute to better tumor eradication but increases the probability of vascular changes.
Radiotherapy also increases the production of free radicals and oxidative stress, processes that upregulate numerous pathways pertinent to vascular disease, including matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), adhesion molecules, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and smooth muscle cell proliferation and apoptosis, while inactivating vasculoprotective nitric oxide (NO).19 Furthermore, fractionated doses increase the adhesiveness of aortic endothelial cells through chemokine-dependent signaling from endothelial cells to leukocytes and significantly increase intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) mRNA and endothelial adhesiveness, which also accelerate vascular inflammation.20,21
Interestingly, neutrophils localized at inflammatory sites can potentially degrade collagen by releasing members of the MMP family.22 Moreover, histological examination has shown that radiotherapy can induce intimal thickening and inflammatory cell infiltrates.5 Histologic examination of biopsy specimens from our patient also disclosed neutrophil accumulation and mixed inflammation in the mucosal layer after CCRT (Figure 1B). Papalambros et al23 found that the concentration of MMP-9 in the arterial wall correlates positively with aneurysm size and radiotherapy has been shown to increase the expression of MMP-9.24 Wilson et al25 found that the concentration of MMP-8 is increased at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture, and radiotherapy also enhances the expression of MMP-8, which modulates the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs.26
CDDP and 5-FU are radiosensitizors that enhance the cytotoxic effects of radiotherapy.7,8 Although CCRT is more effective at tumor eradication than radiotherapy alone, the combined use of CDDP, 5-FU, and radiotherapy can cause unpredictable localized and systemic vascular inflammation with a higher incidence of atherosclerotic disease, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction.9,10 A previous study showed that CDDP results in a decrease in NO production and the upregulation of ICAM-1 expression in endothelial cells that accelerate vascular inflammation.20,21,27 Furthermore, an experimental study in rabbits showed that damage to the intima caused by 5-FU occasionally results in thrombus formation.10 Cwikiel et al28 found that the severity of endothelial injury was proportional to the incidence of thrombus formation. It could be reasonably hypothesized that CDDP-based regimens concurrent with radiotherapy not only sensitize the treatment effects of radiotherapy but also synchronize endothelial injury.
Aortic degeneration and atherosclerosis are the major causes of aotic aneurysms.29 Hypertension is a well-known predisposing factor for vascular degeneration and atherosclerosis. Vardulaki et al30 found that hypertension was an important risk factor for the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm, which increased the risk by 30% to 40%. Also, the prevalence of hypertension was over 60% in populations with thoracic aortic aneurysm.31 The degradation of extracellular matrix proteins by proteases like MMP has the primary role for vascular degeneration and atherosclerosis, and will weaken the aortic wall.29 Combined with the increased concentration and enhanced expression of MMP by RT, and vascular inflammation correlated to the radiosensitizors of CDDP and 5-FU, the underlying hypertension of our patient may accentuate the impairment of aortic wall, and probably increase the incidence of aneurysms formation.
The insertional procedure of metallic stent might contribute to the traumatic injury of aortic and esophageal walls to form the fistula. Schweigert et al32 found that among 17 patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy who underwent endoscopic esophageal stent implantation, 18% developed aortic erosion followed by aortoesophageal fistula. Homann et al33 revealed that patients with esophageal metallic stent implantation experienced esophageal wall and respiratory tract impairment, and the incidence of delayed complications of esophagorespiratory fistula was 9%.
A platelet count below 200 × 103/μL has been shown to be a predictor of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous endovascular procedures.15 In our patient, platelet counts ranged from 91 to 153 × 103/μL 2 weeks after initiation of CCRT that perhaps increased the incidences of iatrogenic psuedoaneurysm also.
CONCLUSION
Multimodality treatment for esophageal cancer comprising CDDP-based CCRT and esophageal metallic stent placement near a great vessel may increase the risk of pseudoaneurysm formation.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CCRT = concurrent chemoradiotherapy, CDDP = Cisplatin, CT = computed tomography, 5-FU = 5-Fluorouracil, ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion molecule 1, MMP = matrix metalloproteinases, NO = nitric oxide, PET = positron emission tomography.
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
REFERENCES
- 1.Weigel TL, Frumiento C, Gaumintz E. Endoluminal palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma. Surg Clin North Am 2002; 82:747–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allum WH, Griffin SM, Watson A, et al. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 2002; 50:v1–v23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eldeeb H, El-Hadaad HA. Radiotherapy versus stenting in treating malignant dysphagia. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 3:322–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Atwood TF, Hsu A, Ogara MM, et al. Radiotherapy dose perturbation of esophageal stents examined in an experimental model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82:1659–1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Russell NS, Hoving S, Heeneman S, et al. Novel insights into pathological changes in muscular arteries of radiotherapy patients. Radiother Oncol 2009; 92:477–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1086–1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dewit L. Combined treatment of radiation and cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (II): a review of experimental and clinical data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13:403–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pu AT, Robertson JM, Lawrence TS. Current status of radiation sensitization by fluoropyrimidines. Oncology (Williston Park) 1995; 9:707–714.discussion 714, 717–708, 721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang YC, Hsieh TC, Chen SW, et al. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy potentiates vascular inflammation: increased FDG uptake in head and neck cancer patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6:512–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cwikiel M, Zhang B, Eskilsson J, et al. The influence of 5-fluorouracil on the endothelium in small arteries. An electron microscopic study in rabbits. Scanning Microsc 1995; 9:561–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Egan C, Szontagh-Kishazi P, Flavin R. Aortic fistula after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: an unusual cause of sudden death. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2012; 33:270–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang WW, Zhu YJ, Yang H, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil and platinum agents for postoperative locoregional recurrence of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Katz ME, Perlman JM, Tack ED, et al. Neonatal umbilical artery pseudoaneurysm: sonographic evaluation (case report). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147:322–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Albuquerque FC, Krasna MJ, McLaughlin JS. Chronic, traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54:980–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mlekusch W, Haumer M, Mlekusch I, et al. Prediction of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous endovascular procedures. Radiology 2006; 240:597–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Byard RW. Lethal aorto-oesophageal fistula – characteristic features and aetiology. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20:164–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lindsay S, Kohn HI, Dakin RL, et al. Aortic arteriosclerosis in the dog after localized aortic x-irradiation. Circ Res 1962; 10:51–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li XA, Chibani O, Greenwald B, et al. Radiotherapy dose perturbation of metallic esophageal stents. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 54:1276–1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weintraub NL, Jones WK, Manka D. Understanding radiation-induced vascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:1237–1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khaled S, Gupta KB, Kucik DF. Ionizing radiation increases adhesiveness of human aortic endothelial cells via a chemokine-dependent mechanism. Radiat Res 2012; 177:594–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cervelli T, Panetta D, Navarra T, et al. Effects of single and fractionated low-dose irradiation on vascular endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2014; 235:510–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weiss SJ, Peppin G, Ortiz X, et al. Oxidative autoactivation of latent collagenase by human neutrophils. Science 1985; 227:747–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Papalambros E, Sigala F, Georgopoulos S, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 in abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with symptoms and aortic diameter. Int J Mol Med 2003; 12:965–968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Asuthkar S, Velpula KK, Nalla AK, et al. Irradiation-induced angiogenesis is associated with an MMP-9-miR-494-syndecan-1 regulatory loop in medulloblastoma cells. Oncogene 2014; 33:1922–1933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wilson WR, Anderton M, Schwalbe EC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 and -9 are increased at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Circulation 2006; 113:438–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hsieh CH, Liu CY, Hsieh YJ, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 mediates the unfavorable systemic impact of local irradiation on pharmacokinetics of anti-cancer drug 5-Fluorouracil. PloS One 2011; 6:e21000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhu M, Chen J, Yin H, et al. Propofol protects human umbilical vein endothelial cells from cisplatin-induced injury. Vascul Pharmacol 2014; 61:72–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cwikiel M, Eskilsson J, Wieslander JB, et al. The appearance of endothelium in small arteries after treatment with 5-fluorouracil. An electron microscopic study of late effects in rabbits. Scanning Microsc 1996; 10:805–818.discussion 819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Isselbacher EM. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 2005; 111:816–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vardulaki KA, Walker NM, Day NE, et al. Quantifying the risks of hypertension, age, sex and smoking in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2000; 87:195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bickerstaff LK, Pairolero PC, Hollier LH, et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Surgery 1982; 92:1103–1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schweigert M, Dubecz A, Stadlhuber RJ, et al. Risk of stent-related aortic erosion after endoscopic stent insertion for intrathoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92:513–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Homann N, Noftz MR, Klingenberg-Noftz RD, et al. Delayed complications after placement of self-expanding stents in malignant esophageal obstruction: treatment strategies and survival rate. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53:334–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
