Abstract
The bronchodilator response to cumulative doses of terbutaline administered by metered dose inhaler with and without a conical spacer device and by Acorn nebuliser has been compared in groups of patients with chronic severe and moderately severe asthma. After laboratory studies the patients undertook a randomised domiciliary crossover comparison of bronchodilator response to terbutaline given by metered dose inhaler with and without a spacer device, during which the severity of asthma was assessed by thrice daily recordings of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom score. Improvement in FEV1 produced in the laboratory by the metered dose inhaler with spacer device was significantly greater than by metered dose inhaler alone (p less than 0.001) and similar to that from the nebuliser in both asthmatic groups throughout a range of terbutaline doses. In the domiciliary comparison mean midday and evening PEF rates were significantly higher with the use of the spacer device both in those with severe (p less than 0.01) and in those with moderately severe (p less than 0.05) asthma, and mean morning PEF was significantly higher in the severe group (p less than 0.05). The spacer device also produced a significant improvement in symptom score in both the severe and the moderately severe groups (p less than 0.05). Regular domiciliary use of the spacer device with the metered dose inhaler improves bronchodilator response, particularly in patients with chronic severe asthma, and may be a useful alternative to nebuliser treatment.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cayton R. M., Webber B., Paterson J. W., Clark T. J. A comparison of salbutamol given by pressure-packed aerosol or nebulization via IPPB in acute asthma. Br J Dis Chest. 1978 Jul;72(3):222–224. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(78)90045-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan M. D., Singh B. V., Frame M. H., Williams S. J. Terbutaline aerosol given through pear spacer in acute severe asthma. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Sep 25;285(6345):849–850. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6345.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris J., Milledge J. S., Moszoro H., Higgins A. The efficacy of drug delivery by a pear-shaped spacer and metered dose inhaler. Br J Dis Chest. 1984 Oct;78(4):383–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newman S. P., Morén F., Pavia D., Little F., Clarke S. W. Deposition of pressurized suspension aerosols inhaled through extension devices. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Sep;124(3):317–320. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.124.3.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newman S. P., Pavia D., Morén F., Sheahan N. F., Clarke S. W. Deposition of pressurised aerosols in the human respiratory tract. Thorax. 1981 Jan;36(1):52–55. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Reilly J. F., Buchanan D. R., Sudlow M. F. Pressurised aerosol with conical spacer is an effective alternative to nebuliser in chronic stable asthma. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 14;286(6377):1548–1548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6377.1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patakas D., Argiropoulou V., Louridas G., Tsara V. Beta-blockers in bronchial asthma: effect of propranolol and pindolol on large and small airways. Thorax. 1983 Feb;38(2):108–112. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.2.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker S. R., Evans M. E., Richards A. J., Paterson J. W. The clinical pharmacology of oral and inhaled salbutamol. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1972 Nov-Dec;13(6):861–867. doi: 10.1002/cpt1972136861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]