Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;16(2):167–174. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000317

Association of bleeding and thrombosis with outcome in Extracorporeal Life Support

Heidi J Dalton 1, Pamela Garcia-Filion 1, Richard Holubkov 1, Frank W Moler 1, Thomas Shanley 1, Sabrina Heidemann 1, Kathy Meert 1, Robert A Berg 1, John Berger 1, Joseph Carcillo 1, Christopher Newth 1, Richard Harrison 1, Allan Doctor 1, Peter Rycus 1, J Michael Dean 1, Tammara Jenkins 1, Carol Nicholson 1, for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health (CPCCRN), Human Development (NICHD) Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network
PMCID: PMC4605822  NIHMSID: NIHMS642252  PMID: 25647124

Abstract

Objective

Changes in technology and increased reports of successful extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use in patient populations such as influenza, cardiac arrest and adults are leading to expansion of ECLS. Major limitations to ECLS expansion remain bleeding and thrombosis. These complications are the most frequent causes of death and morbidity. As a pilot project to provide baseline data for a detailed evaluation of bleeding and thrombosis in the current era, ECLS patients were analyzed from eight centers in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN).

Study design

Retrospective analysis of patients (<19 years) reported to the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry from eight CPCCRN centers between 2005 and 2011.

Subjects

The study cohort consisted of 2036 patients [13% with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)].

Interventions

none

Main results

In the cohort of non-CDH patients (n=1773), bleeding occurred in 38% of patients while thrombosis was noted in 31%. Bleeding and thrombosis were associated with a decreased survival by 40% (RR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.53, 0.66) and 33% (OR 0.67; 95%CI: 0.60, 0.74). Longer duration of ECLS and use of venoarterial cannulation were also associated with increased risk of bleeding and/or thrombotic complications and lower survival. The most common bleeding events included surgical site bleeding (17%; n=306), cannulation site bleeding (14%; n=256), and intracranial hemorrhage (11%; n=192). Common thrombotic events were clots in the circuit (15%; n=274) and the oxygenator (12%; n=212), and hemolysis (plasma free hemoglobin>50 mg/dL) (10%; n=177).

Among patients with CDH, bleeding and thrombosis occurred in, respectively, 45% (n=118) and 60% (n=159), Bleeding events were associated with reduced survival (RR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.46, 0.86) although thrombotic events were not (RR 0.92; 95%CI: 0.67, 1.26).

Conclusions

Bleeding and thrombosis remain common complications in patients undergoing ECLS. Further research to reduce or eliminate bleeding and thrombosis is indicated to help improve patient outcome.

Keywords: Extracorporeal life support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiopulmonary bypass, complications, bleeding, thrombosis

Introduction

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a modified form of cardiopulmonary bypass that provides temporary support to neonates, children and adults with refractory organ failure. (13) Over 58,000 patients have been reported to have received extracorporeal life support (ECLS), according to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) International Registry. (4) Changes in technology and the successful use of ECLS in patient populations such as influenza, cardiac arrest and adults are driving a higher utilization of ECLS in recent years. (412) (10, 13, 14)

Use of ECLS is accompanied by a significant risk for complications that contribute to risk of death and disability. [13] Exposure to the extracorporeal circuit induces a prothrombotic state, indicating need for vigilant monitoring of anticoagulation to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circuit. Traditionally, clinicians rely on unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation. Despite advances in monitoring techniques and treatment of abnormalities in the coagulation cascade during ECLS, bleeding and thrombosis remain predominate complications.(1517) Intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke are the most severe such complications, often resulting in death or significant disability.

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) established a voluntary registry on the clinical use of ECLS (predominantly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, also known as ECMO) (http://www.elso.org). ELSO implemented the registry to monitor the use of ECLS technology for identification of opportunities to improve practice guidelines and outcomes. Registry data include pre-ECLS clinical characteristics, primary diagnosis, reason for ECLS, ECLS parameters, ELSO diagnostic category, complications and outcome. While the ELSO database is of great use in descriptions and outcomes of ECLS support, information collected is limited in scope.

This study leveraged the ELSO registry data to evaluate ECLS related bleeding and thrombotic complications within the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN) of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The CPCCRN, a network of eight medical centers with a focus on pediatric critical care research, are academic sites with dedicated ICU research personnel, pediatric training programs, have greater than 20 ICU beds and average yearly admissions to the ICU of >2000. All are experienced ECLS centers, supporting greater than 20 ECLS-treated patients per year, and each center within CPCCRN is a designated ELSO center of excellence (details at www.ELSO.org) Using the ECLS expertise within CPCCRN and the data available within the ELSO registry, we analyzed the bleeding and thrombosis complication rate and the association of such complications with survival. Findings from this study provided baseline data to inform the design of a prospective, observational cohort study of factors associated with bleeding, thrombosis, outcome, anticoagulation regimens and compliance with center-specific protocols at CPCCRN sites.

Methods

We analyzed ELSO registry data for pediatric patients (less than 19 years) who underwent ECLS at any of the eight current CPCCRN centers during a seven-year period (2005–2011). The study outcomes were the prevalence of reported bleeding and thrombotic complications (definition described below) and survival to hospital discharge.

Approval to include de-identified data from each center was obtained and the study was considered exempt by the Institutional Review Board at Phoenix Children’s Hospital (PCH).

Complications

For this study, bleeding complications extracted from the ELSO registry were identified as bleeding at the cannula site or any surgical site, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage or pulmonary hemorrhage. A list of complications tracked within the ELSO database is shown in Table 1 with those of interest highlighted in bold type. A thrombotic complication was reported clotting of the circuit (bridge, hemofilter, oxygenator, bladder, or “other”), presence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and infarction in the central nervous system. Hemolysis, defined as a plasma hemoglobin >50 mg/dL, was also classified as a thrombotic complication. Of note, specific volume, severity scores or timing within the ECLS run for observed complications do not exist within the ELSO Registry.

Table 1.

List of ELSO mechanical and patient related complications

Patient-related Mechanical
Thrombotic  Oxygenator failure
  Intracranial infarction (by US or CT)  Raceway rupture
  Clots: Oxygenator  Other tubing rupture
  Clots: Bridge  Pump malfunction
  Clots: Bladder  Heat exchange malfunction
  Clots: Hemofilter  Air in circuit
  Clots: Other  Cracks: Connectors
Hemorrhagic  Cannula problems
  Intracranial hemorrhage (US or CT)
  Gastro-intestinal hemorrhage
  Cannulation site bleeding
  Surgical site bleeding
  Hemolysis (plasma hgb>50mg/dl)
  Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
  Pulmonary hemorrhage
 Cardiopulmonary complications
  Inotropes on ECLS
  Myocardial stun by echocardiography
  CPR required
  Cardiac arrhythmia
  Hypertension requiring vasodilator
  PDA: R →L
  PDA: L → R
  PDA: Bidirectional
  PDA: Unknown
  Tamponade: Blood, Serous, Air
 Pulmonary pneumothorax (requiring treatment)
 Neurological complications
  Clinical brain death
  Clinical seizures
  EEG-detected seizures
 Infectious related
 Renal related
  CAVHD required
  Creatinine (1.5–3.0)
  Creatinine (>3.0)
  Dialysis required
  Hemofiltration required
 Metabolic related
  Glucose <40
  Glucose >240
  Hyperbilirubinemia
  pH <7.2
  pH >7.6

Complications of interest

Analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata SE 11.0 (College Station, TX). Descriptive data are presented as median with interquartile range (IQR). The study cohort was stratified based on age: neonatal (less than 31 days of age) and pediatric (age 31 days to 18 years).

The study outcomes (bleeding and thrombotic complications, survival to discharge) were stratified in four groups based on the indication for ECLS support. These groups were ECMO for respiratory failure, cardiac failure, ECMO applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The mode of ECLS was based on initial method of cannulation as either venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV). Duration of ECMO and mode of cannulation were compared with complication events and survival outcome using regression to estimate the associated risk [relative risk (RR); 95% confidence intervals (95%CI]. The distribution of ECLS associated complications and survival were examined and compared between years of ECLS and age groups (neonatal versus pediatric) using chi-square analysis.

Regression models, with covariates when necessary, were constructed to estimate the relative risk (RR) for the association of complications with survival to hospital discharge. Adjustment for VA was restricted to those in the respiratory setting as VA was used almost exclusively for other indications. Inclusion of potentially significant confounders (e.g., organ dysfunction, severity of illness) was limited by data availability within the ELSO registry. Relative risk ratios (RR) are presented with 95% CI. For ordinal independent variables (e.g. year of ECLS, number of complications for individual patients), a linear test for trend was performed. The p values for trend tests (ptrend) were derived by entering the ordinal variable as a continuous parameter in the model.(18) Stratum specific estimates were obtained when statistical significance was reached. The statistical significance was defined as an alpha of 0.05, with two-sided alternative hypotheses.

Results

Over the study period, 2036 patients were supported with ECLS at eight CPCCRN centers. Of these, 263 received support for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Study cohort details are shown in Table 1.

Outcome of neonatal and pediatric ECLS patients (non-CDH)

Among the non-CDH patients, overall survival to discharge was 56% (n=1001/1773), with pediatric survival of 53% and neonatal survival of 59%. The primary indication was respiratory failure in 784 patients (44%), cardiac failure in 727 (41%), and ECPR in 262 patients (15%). Venoarterial support was used in 64% of patients with respiratory failure (n=461/722), and almost exclusively in cardiac failure and ECPR (>99% of patients).

An increase in survival was noted from 53% in 2005 to 57% in 2011, (ptrend=0.003). When a linear effect of year is fitted, annual survival rates for neonatal (ptrend=0.034) and pediatric (ptrend=0.014) patients also improved over time; however, an unexplained decrease in survival is noted among pediatric patients from 61% in 2010 to 49% in 2011. Survival did not vary between CPCCRN centers (p=0.294) among neonatal (p=0.854) or pediatric (p=0.244) patients.

Factors associated with outcome in non-CDH patients

Median duration of ECLS was 131 hours (IQR 73, 216). For every ten hours of ECMO, the risk of complications and death increased (RR 1.005; 95% CI 1.003, 1.007; RR 1.005; 95%CI 1.003, 1.007, respectively). Among patients supported for respiratory failure, VA cannulation mode increased the risk of complications (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.04, 1.26) and death (RR 1.86; 95% CI 1.42, 2.44).

Complication rates for neonatal and pediatric patients steadily declined over the study years (ptrend<0.001) (Figure 1). Bleeding complications occurred in 33% of neonates and 45% of pediatric patients. Thrombotic complications (840 events) occurred in 29% of neonates and 33% of pediatric patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Annual survival and complication rates (excludes cases of CDH)

Bleeding and thrombosis were associated with decreased survival (RR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.53, 0.66) and 33% (RR 0.67; 95%CI: 0.60, 0.74), respectively. The most common bleeding events included surgical site bleeding (17%; n=306), cannulation site bleeding (14%; n=256), and intracranial hemorrhage (11%; n=192). Thrombotic events included clots in the circuit (15%; n=274), clots in the oxygenator (12%; n=212), hemolysis (free hemoglobin >50 mg/dL) (10%; n=177), intracranial infarction (4%; n=74), and DIC (3%; n=59). (Figure 2)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Prevalence of bleeding and thrombotic complications

Patients requiring ECLS for Respiratory Failure

Survival to discharge in patients supported for respiratory failure was 68% (n=530/784), with neonatal survival of 77% and 50% in pediatric patients. The annual survival rates trended upward however, this was not statistically significant (ptrend=0.053). Increased survival was noted in pediatric respiratory patients (ptrend=0.005), but neonatal survival was unchanged over time (ptrend=0.380).

The prevalence of bleeding and thrombotic related complications in neonatal and pediatric patients requiring respiratory support is presented in Figure 2. Among neonatal patients, bleeding occurred in 25% (n=131) and thrombosis in 27% (n=141). Bleeding events were associated with decreased survival (RRadj 0.68; 95%CI: 0.58, 0.80) as were thrombotic events (RRadj 0.79; 95%CI: 0.69, 0.92). Compared to neonatal patients, pediatric patients had a higher prevalence of bleeding (50%, n=131; p<0.001) and thrombotic (37%, n=98; p=0.004) complications. Bleeding complications in pediatric patients were associated with a decrease in survival likelihood (RRadj 0.67; 95%CI: 0.51, 0.87).

An increased number of bleeding complications were associated with decreased likelihood of survival for both neonatal and pediatric patients (ptrend=0.001) (Table 3). The frequency of thrombotic related complications was associated with reduced survival in neonatal patients (ptrend=0.009), but was not associated with survival for pediatric patients (ptrend=0.274).

Table 3.

Frequency of complications during ECLS for respiratory support and relative risk (RR) of survival (excludes cases of CDH)

Bleeding
Thrombosis
No. % (#) % Survival Survival RR 95% CI No. % (#) % Survival Survival RR 95% CI
Neonatal
0 75 (389) 84 1.00 - 0 73 (379) 82 1.00 -
1 22 (115) 57 0.72 0.61, 0.85 1 16 (85) 62 0.80 0.67, 0.95
2+ 3 (16) 31 0.36 0.16, 0.84 2 6 (33) 67 0.83 0.63, 1.08
p<0.001 3+ 4 (23) 57 0.72 0.48, 1.08
p=0.009
Pediatric
0 50 (133) 61 1.00 - 0 63 (166) 52 1.00 -
1 33 (87) 45 0.75 0.57, 0.98 1 22 (58) 50 0.95 0.70, 1.29
2+ 17 (44) 27 0.47 0.27, 0.81 2 10 (26) 50 1.08 0.73, 1.61
p=0.001 3+ 5 (14) 21 0.47 0.17, 1.29
p=0.274

A linear test for trend was performed.

Adjusted for duration of ECLS (hours) and mode of administration (VA, VV).

Patients requiring ECLS for Cardiac Failure

Survival in patients receiving ECLS for cardiac failure was 49% (n=353/727), increasing from 44% in 2005 to 52% in 2011 (ptrend=0.010) (Figure 1). Bleeding and thrombotic related events were noted in 43% (n=316) and 33% (n=237) of patients, respectively. Overall survival for neonates was 40% as compared to 57% in pediatric patients (p<0.001). Annual survival rates for neonatal and pediatric patients were unchanged (ptrend=0.136 and ptrend=0.133, respectively). Bleeding events were associated with reduced survival for neonates and pediatric cardiac patients by 33% (RRadj 0.67; 95%CI 0.51, 0.88) and 32% (RRadj 0.68; 95%CI: 0.55, 0.83), respectively. A similar decrease in survival likelihood associated with thrombotic complications was noted for both neonatal (RRadj 0.56; 95%CI 0.38, 0.82) and pediatric (RRadj 0.63; 95%CI: 0.49, 0.82) patients.

The bleeding and thrombotic related complications in patients that underwent ECLS for cardiac failure are presented in Figure 2. Increasing frequency of bleeding and thrombotic related complications were also associated with decreased survival (ptrend (all)<0.01) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Frequency of complications during ECLS for cardiac support and relative risk of survival (excludes cases of CDH)

Bleeding
Thrombosis
No. % (#) % Survival Survival RR 95% CI No. % (#) % Survival Survival RR 95% CI
Neonatal
0 57 (211) 49 1.00 - 0 68 (251) 49 1.00 -
1 28 (103) 35 0.80 0.59, 1.07 1 20 (75) 21 0.51 0.32, 0.81
2+ 16 (58) 19 0.45 0.26, 0.77 2 8 (29) 31 0.78 0.45, 1.35
p<0.001 3+ 5 (17) 12 0.36 0.09, 1.35
p=0.014
Pediatric
0 56 (200) 69 1.00 - 0 67 (239) 67 1.00 -
1 31 (109) 42 0.66 0.52, 0.83 1 20 (70) 41 0.67 0.50, 0.89
2+ 13 (46) 43 0.73 0.52, 1.02 2 10 (35) 31 0.57 0.34, 0.93
p=0.003 3+ 3 (11) 27 0.58 0.23, 1.47
p=0.002

A linear test for trend was performed.

Adjusted for the duration of ECLS (hours).

Patients requiring ECLS for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)

ECLS was initiated for ECPR in 15% (n= 262) of the non-CDH cohort, of which 42% were neonates [median age among neonates 7 days (IQR: 4, 12)]. Survival among ECPR patients to discharge was 45% and was unchanged across the study years (ptrend=0.282).

Bleeding and thrombotic complications occurred in 38% (n=99) and 29% (n=77) of patients with ECPR, respectively. Bleeding rates were similar between neonates and pediatric patients (37% vs 39%; p=0.759), as was the incidence of thrombosis (30% vs 29%; p=0.790). In neonates, bleeding complications were associated with reduced survival (RRadj 0.45; 95%CI 0.23, 0.86) but thrombosis was not (p=0.124). In pediatric patients, bleeding complications were not associated with survival (p=0.187). The presence of hrombotic complications, however, was associated with reduced survival (RRadj 0.59; 95%CI 0.37, 0.95)

In the ECPR subgroup, the most common source of bleeding was at surgical sites (16%; n=41/262) while thrombotic complications from hemolysis (12%; n=32/262) and clots in the circuit (12%; n=32/262) predominated.

Patients requiring ECLS for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Overall survival for patients with CDH was 41% (n=109/263). No increase in survival was noted over the study time period. (ptrend=0.876). Bleeding and thrombotic complications in the CDH group were found in 45% (n=118) and 60% (n=159), respectively. Bleeding complications were associated with reduced survival (RR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.46, 0.86) although thrombotic complications were not (RR 0.92; 95%CI: 0.67, 1.26). Increasing frequency of bleeding complications were also associated with reduced survival likelihood (ptrend=0.006) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Frequency of complications during ECLS for congenital diaphragmatic hernia and relative risk of survival

Bleeding
Thrombosis
No. % (#) % Survival Survival RR 95% CI No. % (#) % Survival Survival RR 95% CI
Neonatal
0 55 (145) 50 1.00 - 0 40 (104) 48 1.00 -
1 34 (89) 33 0.65 0.46, 0.91 1 29 (75) 37 0.90 0.62, 1.31
2 11 (29) 24 0.53 0.27, 1.04 2 18 (48) 38 0.95 0.61, 1.48
p=0.006 3 14 (36) 36 0.92 0.55, 1.52
p=0.740

A linear test for trend was performed.

Adjusted for the duration of ECLS (hours).

Discussion

In this retrospective analysis of ELSO registry data from clinical sites in CPCCRN, we identified a trend towards increased survival between 2005 and 2011. The majority of improvement is in patients receiving ECLS for respiratory support, as those with ECPR, CDH and cardiac support had fairly static survival rates over the study period. Such an improvement is encouraging, given that patients receiving ECLS for respiratory failure in the current era are reported to have more comorbidities adversely affecting survival.(19)

The reason for poor survivability of neonatal CDH patients receiving ECLS remains elusive. Reports of improved survival due to scoring systems for severity of CDH and treatment or surgical regimens have been limited to single center studies.(2023) Fatal bleeding events are high among this patient population, and the occurrence of thrombotic events may reflect anticoagulation efforts.(24) Our analysis of patients treated within CPCCRN sites found no association between thrombotic events and survival. The absence of an association raises the question about the presence of subclinical thrombus similar to those identified in postmortem exams of adult populations.(25, 26)

Data from this report is subject to limitations similar to those noted in previous reports based on ELSO registry data. Data available for analysis did not allow correlation between timing of bleeding and/or thrombotic events and other factors such as anticoagulation status, organ failure severity or specific data on administration of blood products. Similarly, while venoarterial support during ECLS for respiratory support was associated with decreased survival, this may be related to pre-ECLS severity factors or other details rather than the mode itself (27, 28) but specific data points to establish this association are not available within the registry. Outcome measures were limited to survival. Nonetheless, this focused evaluation from academic sites with large ECMO populations and long experience is useful to inform the field of factors associated with outcome in the current era. Our findings highlight a lack of success in development of anticoagulation regimens and ECMO practices and processes to limit or eliminate the occurrence of bleeding and thrombosis.

The variability in ECMO practice between centers remains an ongoing limitation to research on ECLS. The ability to develop studies aimed at a specific anticoagulation regimen or intervention is confounded by non-standardized ECMO equipment and management algorithms. Perhaps the time has come to standardize ECMO practice and procedures to aid scientific research and advance the field. This novel approach in ECMO has not been implemented in the past and represents a paradigm shift in ECMO practice, as most centers have developed their own unique practices. (29)

To achieve the goal of eliminating bleeding and thrombosis related death during ECMO, investigations must employ rigorous, prospective observational designs to systematically gather data at a more granular level than is currently available. ELSO is currently revising the registry data fields to strengthen variable definitions (e.g., complications) and to add fields which would allow more exact severity of illness scoring as well as identify timing of complications during the ECMO course.. This analysis was conducted in preparation for a multi-center trial of bleeding and thrombosis during ECMO among CPCCRN sites. By capitalizing on the CPCCRN infrastructure, the author and collaborators are in pursuit of a framework to standardize ECMO practice—from circuitry to anticoagulation algorithms to patient management –in order to design and implement scientifically rigorous studies. Successful implementation of such a process within ECLS will open the door for similar efforts throughout critical care medicine. (30, 31)

Table 2.

Characteristics of the study cohort (n=2036)

Percent (%) N
Male (n=2011) 56 1132
Neonatal (non-CDH) 56 1001
Race/Ethnicity (n=1993)
 Caucasian 48 963
 Hispanic 19 385
 African-American 22 447
 Asian-Pacific Islander 3 68
 Other 7 130
Conventional ventilator (non-CDH) 63 772
Indication for ECLS
Respiratory 39 784
 Neonates 66 520
 Pediatric 34 264
Cardiac 36 727
 Neonates 51 372
 Pediatric 49 355
ECPR 13 262
 Neonatal 42 109
 Pediatric 58 153
CDH 13 263

Percents were rounded to the nearest integer.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by the following cooperative agreements from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services: U10HD050096, U10HD049981, U10HD049983, U10HD050012, U10HD063108, U10HD063106, U10HD063114, and U01HD049934.

This project was a collaborative effort between the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN) and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). We thank all the ECMO coordinators and directors at CPCCRN sites for their help in data collection and their tireless support of these complex patients.

Footnotes

Reprints: No reprints available

References

  • 1.Bartlett RH, Gattinoni L. Current status of extracorporeal life support (ecmo) for cardiopulmonary failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 76:534–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shuhaiber J, Thiagarajan RR, Laussen PC, Fynn-Thompson F, del Nido P, Pigula F. Survival of children requiring repeat extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 91:1949–1955. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Undar A, McKenzie ED, McGarry MC, Owens WR, Surprise DL, Kilpack VD, Mueller MW, Stayer SA, Andropoulos DB, Towbin JA, Fraser CD., Jr Outcomes of congenital heart surgery patients after extracorporeal life support at texas children’s hospital. Artif Organs. 2004;28:963–966. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.07378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR. Extracorporeal life support organization registry report 2012. ASAIO J. 2013;59:202–210. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182904a52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Delmo Walter EM, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Huebler M, Redlin M, Boettcher W, Weng Y, Berger F, Hetzer R. Rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children with refractory cardiac arrest. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2011;12:929–934. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.254193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Almond CS, Buchholz H, Massicotte P, Ichord R, Rosenthal DN, Uzark K, Jaquiss RD, Kroslowitz R, Kepler MB, Lobbestael A, Bellinger D, Blume ED, Fraser CD, Jr, Bartlett RH, Thiagarajan R, Jenkins K. Berlin heart excor pediatric ventricular assist device investigational device exemption study: Study design and rationale. American heart journal. 2011;162:425–435. e426. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brogan T, Thiagarajan R, Rycus P, Bartlett R, Bratton S. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with severe respiratory failure: A multi-center database. Intensive Care Medicine. 2009;35:2105–2114. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1661-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zimmermann M, Bein T, Arlt M, Philipp A, Rupprecht L, Mueller T, Lubnow M, Graf BM, Schlitt HJ. Pumpless extracorporeal interventional lung assist in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective pilot study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R10. doi: 10.1186/cc7703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rajagopal SK, Almond CS, Laussen PC, Rycus PT, Wypij D, Thiagarajan RR. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the support of infants, children, and young adults with acute myocarditis: A review of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Crit Care Med. 38:382–387. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181bc8293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dalton HJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the 21st century: A decade of change. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 12:692–693. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181fe2e97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Huxtable RF, Schippers HC, O’Connor MJ, Jefferies MR. Extracorporeal circulation (ecmo) in neonatal respiratory failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;74:826–833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Elg M, Carlsson S, Gustafsson D. Effect of activated prothrombin complex concentrate or recombinant factor viia on the bleeding time and thrombus formation during anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor. Thrombosis research. 2001;101:145–157. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(00)00397-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chai PJ, Jacobs JP, Dalton HJ, Costello JM, Cooper DS, Kirsch R, Rosenthal T, Graziano JN, Quintessenza JA. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for post-operative cardiac arrest: Indications, techniques, controversies, and early results - what is known (and unknown) Cardiol Young. 2011;21 (Suppl 2):109–117. doi: 10.1017/S1047951111001685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gow KW, Lao OB, Leong T, Fortenberry JD. Extracorporeal life support for adults with malignancy and respiratory or cardiac failure: The extracorporeal life support experience. Am J Surg. 199:669–675. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sniecinski RM, Karkouti K, Levy JH. Managing clotting: A north american perspective. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2011 doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834ebd59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oliver WC. Anticoagulation and coagulation management for ecmo. Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. 2009;13:154–175. doi: 10.1177/1089253209347384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith A, Hardison D, Bridges B, Pietsch J. Red blood cell transfusion volume and mortality among patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. 2013;28:54–60. doi: 10.1177/0267659112457969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maclure M, Greenland S. Tests for trend and dose response: Misinterpretations and alternatives. American journal of epidemiology. 1992;135:96–104. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zabrocki LA, Brogan TV, Statler KD, Poss WB, Rollins MD, Bratton SL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric respiratory failure: Survival and predictors of mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:364–370. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fb7b35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hirschl RB. Innovative therapies in the management of newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 1996;5:256–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Madderom MJ, Toussaint L, van der Cammen-van Zijp MH, Gischler SJ, Wijnen RM, Tibboel D, Ijsselstijn H. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia with(out) ecmo: Impaired development at 8 years. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2013;98:F316–322. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Keijzer R, Wilschut DE, Houmes RJ, van de Ven KP, van den Hout L, Sluijter I, Rycus P, Bax KM, Tibboel D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: To repair on or off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:631–636. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoffman SB, Massaro AN, Gingalewski C, Short BL. Survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Use of predictive equations in the ecmo population. Neonatology. 2011;99:258–265. doi: 10.1159/000319064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Downard CD, Betit P, Chang RW, Garza JJ, Arnold JH, Wilson JM. Impact of amicar on hemorrhagic complications of ecmo: A ten-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:1212–1216. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00270-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rastan AJ, Lachmann N, Walther T, Doll N, Gradistanac T, Gommert JF, Lehmann S, Wittekind C, Mohr FW. Autopsy findings in patients on postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) The International journal of artificial organs. 2006;29:1121–1131. doi: 10.1177/039139880602901205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rastan AJ, Gummert JF, Lachmann N, Walther T, Schmitt DV, Falk V, Doll N, Caffier P, Richter MM, Wittekind C, Mohr FW. Significant value of autopsy for quality management in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1292–1300. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mehta NM, Turner D, Walsh B, Zurakowski D, Betit P, Wilson J, Arnold JH. Factors associated with survival in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation--a single-center experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:1995–2003. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barrett CS, Bratton SL, Salvin JW, Laussen PC, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR. Neurological injury after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use to aid pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10:445–451. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318198bd85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bembea MM, Annich G, Rycus P, Oldenburg G, Berkowitz I, Pronovost P. Variability in anticoagulation management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An international survey. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2013;14:e77–84. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31827127e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lequier L, Horton SB, McMullan DM, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitry. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2013;14:S7–12. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318292dd10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meyer AD, Wiles AA, Rivera O, Wong EC, Freishtat RJ, Rais-Bahrami K, Dalton HJ. Hemolytic and thrombocytopathic characteristics of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems at simulated flow rate for neonates. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2012;13:e255–261. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31823c98ef. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES