Abstract
Background
Sepsis is one of the major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and diagnosis of neonatal sepsis are difficult because of the variable and non-specific clinical presentation of this condition. Hence, there is a need for early predictive screening method for neonatal sepsis.
Objectives
To evaluate the role of Cord blood Haematological Scoring System as an early predictive screening method for detection of early onset neonatal sepsis and also to identify the neonates who are at risk of developing neonatal sepsis using cord blood.
Settings and Design
The present prospective cross-sectional study was conducted by taking 153 cord blood samples of full term newborns immediately after delivery in the hospital. Pre-term, still birth and emergency deliveries were excluded from the study.
Materials and Methods
The cord blood was collected and analysed for various Haematological parameters like Total leucocyte count, Absolute Neutrophil count, Immature to mature Neutrophil ratio, immature to mature ratio, Neutrophil morphology, nucleated erythrocytes, platelet count, micro erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Blood cultures were performed as gold standard for diagnosing neonatal sepsis.
Statistical Analysis
Chi-square test, Risk ratio, risks in exposed and risk in unexposed were performed.
Results
Of 153 newborns for analysis, 59 (38.56%) developed sepsis. The haematological scoring system found that an abnormal immature to total neutrophil ratio, Neutropenia, micro erythrocyte sedimentation rate followed by an abnormal immature to mature neutrophil ratio were the most sensitive indicators in identifying infants with sepsis. The study also found that higher the score, the greater the certainty of sepsis being present.
Conclusion
The haematological scoring system using cord blood can be considered as an early predictive screening method for detection of early onset neonatal sepsis. Identifying the risk of developing sepsis early can prevent morbidity and mortality of the neonates.
Keywords: Blood culture, Neutrophil count, Nucleated erythrocytes, Platelet count
Introduction
Neonatal sepsis is a common and major risk factor for neonatal morbidity and mortality in the developing countries [1]. The neonates have prematurity of immune system, hence it is agreed that neonatal sepsis is a syndrome, expressing both metabolic and haemodynamic impairments, brought about by infection. The clinical manifestation of sepsis in newborn infants is usually non-specific; thereby diagnosis of sepsis only by clinical findings is difficult [2]. Thus, diagnosis of sepsis relies on combination of various laboratory tests. The usual practice is, after development of clinical sepsis i.e. significant multisystem disease; blood sample is collected by venipuncture from the neonates and sent for culture and haematology. Collection of blood sample can induce pain or infection or iatrogenic anaemia to the neonates. There are no previous documented reports of early predictive screening methods for neonatal sepsis by using cord blood sample. Neonatal Sepsis can be divided into two groups named as early onset (first 72 hours of life) and late onset sepsis (>72 hours) [3]. The case fatality rate is higher in early onset sepsis as compared to late onset sepsis. Hence, the present study was conducted to evaluate the role of Cord Blood- Haematological Scoring System (CB-HSS) as an early predictive screening method for diagnosis of early onset neonatal sepsis.
Materials and Methods
The present prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at Mamata Medical College, Khammam from January 2013 to June 2014. For the purpose of study, 153 cord blood samples were collected immediately after delivery. Cord blood of the newborns were collected and analysed for this study. All live, full term deliveries were included whereas preterm, still birth and emergency deliveries were excluded from the study.
Immediately after the delivery, 5ml of the cord blood was collected using a sterile 22-guage needle with syringe and ejected into vacutainer containing EDTA anticoagulant for assessing haematological parameters. Two ml of cord blood was transferred to anticoagulant EDTA bulb for analysing haematological parameters like total WBC count, WBC Differential count and Platelet count. Zero calibration of the equipment had been performed after each sampling process to avoid error in analysing. Peripheral smear preparation and analysis were also performed for confirmation of parameters including cell counting and to study the morphological changes of Neutrophils and nRBC levels. The remaining blood sample was used for micro ESR estimation and Blood culture which was considered the gold standard for diagnosis of Sepsis. The haematological scoring system was prepared based on re-categorizing the previous study which had been categorized into clinical sepsis, suspected sepsis and proven sepsis [4]. All the haematological parameters were combined [Table/Fig-1] [5,6] and scores were prepared based on the variation from the normal reference values for early and simple approach towards management of the newborn and thereby further prevent morbidity and mortality. The categorized groups (No risk group, Low risk group, High risk group and Sepsis group) were formed based on the results obtained from the screening tests and not related to maternal factors. The feedbacks of the results obtained were given to the respective gynaecologist/paediatrician.
[Table/Fig-1]:
Parameters | Findings | Score |
---|---|---|
Total leukocyte Count | ≤ 5,000 /mm3 | 02 |
≥ 25,000 /mm3 | 01 | |
Absolute Neutrophil Count | No mature Neutrophils seen | 02 |
Absolute Neutrophil Count [Mature Neutrophils] | < 1,500 /mm3 | 02 |
> 8,000 /mm3 | 01 | |
I/T Ratio | > 0.2 | 01 |
I/M Ratio | > 0.3 | 01 |
Neutrophil Morphology | > 30% | 01 |
nRBCs | > 10 /100WBCs | 01 |
Platelet Count | < 1,50,000 /mL | 01 |
Micro ESR | > 15mm/hr | 01 |
Total | 12 |
Ethics
With the help of gynaecologist, informed consent from the mother was taken on the day of admission in Mamata General Hospital for delivery. Details and advantage of the study were explained, and only those who gave consent were included.
Statistical Analysis
Chi-square test, Risk ratio, risk in exposed and risk in unexposed were performed.
Results
Of the total 153 full term normal delivery newborns, 59 (38.56%) developed early onset sepsis which were confirmed by positive cord blood culture. All the haematological parameters in the present study used in CB-HSS showed statistically significant values. The abnormal variation in parameters like nRBCs (nucleated red blood cells), ANC (Absolute Neutrophil count), I/T ratio (Immature/Total count ratio), I/M ratio (Immature/Mature ratio) and Neutrophil morphology showed > 65% risk in developing sepsis among newborns, whereas remaining parameters like Total count, Platelet count and micro ESR showed >50% risk in developing sepsis. Parameters like Neutrophil morphology and Platelet count showed abnormal variation in >33% of newborns without sepsis [Table/Fig-2].
[Table/Fig-2]:
Parameters | N-N | N-D | A-N | A-D | Chi square test | RE | RUE | Relative Risk | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nRBC’s | 83 | 15 | 11 | 44 | 62.23 | 80% | 15.3% | 5.23 | < 0.001* |
Total Count | 44 | 01 | 50 | 58 | 35.53 | 53.7% | 2.2% | 24.4 | < 0.001* |
ANC | 77 | 01 | 17 | 58 | 93.34 | 77.3% | 1.3% | 59.46 | < 0.001* |
I/T ratio | 69 | 02 | 25 | 57 | 71.45 | 69.51 | 2.8% | 24.82 | < 0.001* |
I/M ratio | 66 | 02 | 28 | 57 | 65.55 | 67.1% | 2.9% | 23.13 | < 0.001* |
Neut Morp | 88 | 18 | 06 | 41 | 56.8 | 95.3% | 34.8% | 2.74 | < 0.001* |
Platelet Count | 76 | 39 | 18 | 20 | 4.22 | 52.6% | 33.9% | 1.55 | <0.05 |
microESR | 62 | 03 | 32 | 56 | 54.97 | 54.9% | 4.6% | 11.9 | < 0.001* |
* Highly significant
In 153 neonates, 47 (30.71%) had abnormal morphological changes. The commonest morphological abnormality observed in sepsis was Toxic granules (18/47, 38.29%) followed by combination of toxic granules with cytoplasmic vacuolations (15/47, 31.91%) and cytoplasmic vacuolations alone (08/47, 17.02%). The cytoplasmic vacuolations alone (04/47, 8.51%) was frequently seen in neonates without sepsis [Table/Fig-3].
[Table/Fig-3]:
Neutrophil Morphology | With Sepsis | Without Sepsis | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Toxic granules | 18 | 01 | 19 |
Cytoplasmic vacuolations | 08 | 04 | 12 |
Toxic Granules + cytoplasmic vacuolations | 15 | 01 | 16 |
Total | 41 | 06 | 47 |
All the neonates in Sepsis group had CB-HSS value between10-12 whereas 90.62% neonates developed sepsis among high risk group and 15% neonates developed sepsis among Low risk group [Table/Fig-4].
[Table/Fig-4]:
Risk of Sepsis vs New Haematological Scoring System | |||
---|---|---|---|
NHSS | Death | Developed sepsis | |
No Sepsis [n-74] | <4 | 0 | 0 |
Low risk [n-20] | 4-6 | 01 [5%] | 03 [15%] |
High Risk [n-32] | 7-9 | 04 [12.5%] | 29 [90.62%] |
Sepsis [n-27] | 10-12 | 06 [22.22] | 27 [100%] |
The relative risk of Absolute Neutrophil Count (59.46), I/T ratio (24.82), Total Count (24.4) and I/M ratio (23.13) suggests that they are more reliable markers in identifying the risk of developing neonatal sepsis.
EONS was frequently seen on day 1 (37/59, 62.71%) of neonates followed by day 2 (14/59, 23.73%) and day 3 (08/59, 13.56%) [Table/Fig-5].
[Table/Fig-5]:
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
No Sepsis [n-74] | – | – | – |
Low risk [n-20] | 00 | 02 | 01 |
High Risk [n-32] | 15 | 08 | 06 |
Sepsis [n-27] | 22 | 04 | 01 |
Total | 37 | 14 | 08 |
The most common microorganism isolated among sepsis group was Group B Streptococcus while in High risk group Staphylococcus aureus was frequently observed. In low risk group, Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were seen [Table/Fig-6].
[Table/Fig-6]:
Microorganisms | Sepsis | High Risk | Low risk | No risk | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group B Streptococcus | 18 | 09 | 00 | 00 | 27 |
E.coli | 02 | 05 | 00 | 00 | 07 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 07 | 13 | 00 | 00 | 20 |
Klebsiella | 00 | 02 | 02 | 00 | 04 |
Acinetobacter | 00 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
No Growth | 00 | 03 | 17 | 74 | 94 |
Total | 27 | 32 | 20 | 74 | 153 |
Discussion
Sepsis is one of the most common infectious conditions in the neonatal period, and remains a major source of morbidity and mortality despite extraordinary progress in the field of neonatology in recent years [1]. Early-onset neonatal sepsis usually occurs in the first 72 hours of life, with 80 to 90% of cases presenting upto 48 hours after birth [3]. Early onset sepsis typically manifests as a fulminant, multisystem illness usually acquired by vertical transmission from the mother. Late-onset sepsis may occur as early as postnatal day 3, but is more common after the first week of life and is usually a progressive illness characterized by focal infection. The case fatality rate is higher in Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) as compared with Late onset sepsis In the present study, the incidence of EONS among full term newborn was 38.56% (59/153) which can suggest the burden of disease.
It is well-known that withdrawing large amounts of blood from a neonate can be challenging and may also lead to necessary blood transfusions due to iatrogenic anaemia [7]. For infants and children, blood sampling by venipuncture can be difficult. It has been supported that, in routine clinical practice a large proportion of negative blood cultures were almost inevitable because of the submission of an inadequate volume of blood [8]. Repeated needle prick for adequate blood sample can cause more pain to the neonate resulting in abnormal neurobehavioral development [9]. There are two documented reports concluding that umbilical cord blood may prove to be a satisfactory alternative to infant blood for neonatal sepsis evaluation by blood culture and total leucocyte count [10,11]. Hence, we used umbilical cord blood for the study.
Although various tests [12,13] like complete blood count and Neutrophil parameters, are used as a diagnostic tool for neonatal sepsis, the complete blood count with differential is widely used, either singly or in conjunction with other test or clinical findings. The advantage of Haematological Scoring System lies in the fact that it is easy and applicable to all infants, including those who have received antibiotic. In the present study, along with existing HSS parameters like total leucocyte count, I/T ratio, I/M ratio, ANC and microESR, we included new HSS parameters like nRBCs, morphological characteristics of neutrophils and platelet counts. The combination of all these parameters gives better results rather than individual or in conjunction. The abnormal variations in parameters like nRBCs, ANC, I/T ratio, I/M ratio and Neutrophil morphology showed > 65% risk in developing sepsis among newborns, whereas other parameters like Total leucocyte count, platelet count and microESR showed >50% risk in developing sepsis. This suggests that immature RBCs and WBCs play important vital role in neonatal sepsis compared to platelets.
The major problem in neonatal infections is identification of newborn’s at risk of developing sepsis because of its nonspecific clinical symptoms. In the present study, 90.62% high risk group and 15% low risk group developed sepsis but lacked clinical evidence. These are the neonates who pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma because fatal infections occur in EONS. We also observed that most of the EONS (62.71%) were seen within 24 h of delivery. The most common microorganism isolated among the sepsis group was Group B Streptococcus while in High risk group Staphylococcus aureus was observed. In low risk group, Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were seen.
Conclusion
Cord blood can reduce the complex sample collection procedure of obtaining neonatal blood. CB-HSS of cord blood can be performed rapidly and results are obtained early when compared to culture which is the gold standard. These results if informed early to the Paediatrician/gynaecologist, antimicrobial regimen can be started to prevent septic attack and further complications. Haematological parameters used in CB-HSS can be easily performed in laboratories with basic facilities. Thus, CB-HSS of cord blood can be used as an early predictive screening method for all the newborns to identify early onset neonatal sepsis.
Financial or Other Competing Interests
None.
References
- [1].Chacko B, Sohi I. Early onset neonatal sepsis. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:23–26. doi: 10.1007/BF02760574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Adams-Chapman I, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infection and long-term neurodevelopment outcome in the preterm infant. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006;19:290–97. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000224825.57976.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Haque KN. Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:S45–49. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161946.73305.0A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Sucilathangam G, Amuthavalli K, Velvizhi G, Ashihabegum MA, Jeyamurugan T, Palaniappan N. Early Diagnostic Markers for Neonatal Sepsis: Comparing Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;(Suppl-2)6(4):627–31. [Google Scholar]
- [5].Manroe BL, Weinberg AG. The neonatal blood count in health and disease. Reference values for neutrophilic cells. J Pediatr. 1979;95:89–98. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Rodwell RL, Leslie AL, Tudehope DI. Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using a Haematologic scoring system. J Pediatr. 1988;112:761–67. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80699-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Schelonka RL, Chai MK, Yoder BA, Hensley D, Brockett RM, Ascher DP. Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. Journal of Pediatrics. 1996;8(129):275–78. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70254-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Connell TG, Rele M, Cowley D, Buttery JP, Curtis N. How reliable is a negative blood culture result? Volume of blood submitted for culture in routine practice in a children’s hospital. Pediatrics. 2007;119:891–96. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Franck LS, Lawhon G. Environmental and behavioral strategies to prevent and manage neonatal pain. Seminars in Perinatology. 1998;99(5):434–43. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(98)80059-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Polin J, Knox I, Baumgart S, Campman E, Mennuti M, Polin R. Use of umbilical cord blood culture for detection of neonatal bacteremia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1981;57(2):233–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Hansen A, Forbes P, Buck R. Potential substitution of cord blood for infant blood in the neonatal sepsis evaluation. Biology of the Neonate. 2008;88:12–18. doi: 10.1159/000083946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Da Silva O, Ohlsson A, Kenyon C. Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:362–66. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199505000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Ng PC. Diagnostic markers of infection in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2004;89:229–35. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.023838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]