Abstract
Cancer is a multifactorial disease that arises as a consequence of alterations in many physiological processes. Recently, hallmarks of cancer were suggested that include sustaining proliferative signaling, evading growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, inducing angiogenesis, and activating invasion and metastasis, along with two emerging hallmarks including reprogramming energy metabolism and escaping immune destruction. Treating multifactorial diseases, such as cancer with agents targeting a single target, might provide partial treatment and, in many cases, disappointing cure rates. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that the regular consumption of fruits and vegetables is strongly associated with a reduced risk of developing chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Since ancient times, plants, herbs, and other natural products have been used as healing agents. Moreover, the majority of the medicinal substances available today have their origin in natural compounds. Traditionally, pharmaceuticals are used to cure diseases, and nutrition and herbs are used to prevent disease and to provide an optimal balance of macro- and micro-nutrients needed for good health. We explored the combination of natural products, dietary nutrition, and cancer chemotherapeutics for improving the efficacy of cancer chemotherapeutics and negating side effects.
Keywords: Cancer, cancer therapy, natural products, herbs, nutrition
Introduction
A long history exists of natural products originating from plants, fungi, and microorganisms that have been used for the treatment and prevention of human diseases. In recent years, there has been an emerging focus on the exploration of natural products, including dietary phytoconstituents, in cancer prevention and treatment. An analysis of the origin of drugs developed between 1981 and 2002 showed that natural products or natural-product-derived drugs comprise 28% of all novel chemical entities (NCEs) launched into the market.1 Examples of anti-cancer agents originating from natural sources include vinblastine from Vinca rosea, one of the earliest examples, and paclitaxel, the most recent example, which originates from a Chinese pacific yew plant.2 Other plant-derived anti-cancer agents include etoposide, teniposide, homoharringtonine, and camptothecin derivatives.
Natural products as inhibitors of cancer cell proliferation and as inducers of cancer cell cycle arrests and apoptosis
Proliferation is the multiplication or reproduction of cells resulting in the rapid expansion of a cell population. Mammalian cell growth and proliferation are mediated via cell cycle progression. In each cell division cycle, chromosomes are replicated once (DNA synthesis or S-phase) and segregated to create two genetically identical daughter cells (mitosis or M-phase). These events are spaced by intervals of growth and reorganization (gap phases G1 and G2). Progression through the G1 phase of the cell division cycle is a rate-limiting step in mammalian cell proliferation and is governed by numerous mitogenic pathways until the restriction point is passed. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK), CDK4 and CDK6, complexed with cyclin D1 are responsible for cell cycle progression through the G1 phase, and the CDK2/cyclin E complex functions in the progression of the cell from the late G1 to the early S-phase.
Apoptosis is the predominant mechanism by which cancer cells die when subjected to chemotherapy or irradiation. However, cancer cells develop resistance to these therapies that may be due, at least in part, to the development of effective anti-apoptotic mechanisms.3
More than 600 natural products are reported to possess pharmaceutical activity and many of them exhibit anti-cancer activity. Among the 600 natural products, curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a yellow spice and phenolic compound derived from the plant Curcuma longa, is one of the most powerful and promising chemo-preventive and anti-cancer agents.4 Curcumin has been found to exert preventive and therapeutic effects in various cancers, in part, due to its ability to influence a diverse range of molecular targets and signaling pathways, including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), PI3K and AKT pathways. Moreover, the number of its proposed cellular targets grows as research continues. Recently, curcumin was implicated in modulating cancer cell proliferation by targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways6,7 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Major natural products | Principal target genes |
---|---|
Curcumin | Wnt/β-catenin pathway;65MMP2;40,63MMP14;40TIMP-1;63Gelatinase;40EGF;51–54MMP9;41,39,43VEGF;39,43,63bFGF;63NF-κB;5STAT3;5PI3K/AKT;5mTOR;6,7JNK;51ERK1/2;51uPA;51VEGF;42KDR;42Angiopoietin1/242 |
Sulforaphane (SFN) | Wnt/β-catenin pathway;72IL-6;60 IL-1β;60TNFα;60PDGF;60VEGF;60 NF-κB;74 GATA674 |
Resveratrol | β-catenin;71VEGF;46Src;15,46NF-κB;14,15AP1;14,15Egr1;14,15MAPKs;14,15AR;16AKT;14,16Caspase-9;14COX;15NOS;15IL-1β;75PI3K75 |
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) | Wnt/β-catenin signaling;65NF-κB; 30HER2;31AKT;32ERK;32ER-α;32MMP266 |
Quercetin | Wnt/β-catenin signaling;65EGF;51,53VEGF;54HER2/neu;51,53HER3;51,53VEGF-R2;36COX-2;52iNOS;52TGF-α;53 c-Raf;53MEK1/2;53Elk-1;53AKT;36,53mTOR36 |
EGCG | Wnt/β-catenin signaling;65NF-κB;17DNMT76–78 |
Lycopene | NF-κB;64MMP9;64IGF-1;25AKT;23–25β-catenin;25cyclin D1;24Bad;24AR;25PSA;26pRb;23ICAM-1;22TNFα;22SP-1;64IGF-1R64 |
Genistein | EGF;18,51FOXO3;18NF-κB;18Notch-1;18uPA;51JNK;51ERK1/251 |
13-cis-retinoic acid | IL-2;44TIMP-1;44NF-κB;44ATF-2;44c-fos44 |
Indol-3-carbinol (I3C) | IGF1R;8IRS-1;8ERα8 |
Urolithin, ellagitannins and punicalagin | PSA;20Aromatase;21NF-κB20 |
Amentoflavone | COX-2;52 iNOS52 |
Indirubin | VEGF-R2;38JAK/STAT338 |
Salvianolic Acid B (Sal B) | TGF-β1;62Smad2/3;62Smad7;62MMP262 |
13C: indol-3-carbinol; SAL B: salvianolic acid B; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; TIMP-1: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; EGF: epidermal growth factor; FOXO3: forkhead box O3; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; bFGF: basic fibroblast growth factor; STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinases; ERK: extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; uPA: urokinase-type plasminogen activator; KDR: kinase insert domain receptor; IL: interleukin; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; PGDF: platelet-derived growth factor receptor; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; AR: androgen receptor; COX: cyclooxygenase; NOS: nitric oxide synthase; ER-α: estrogen receptor-alpha; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; DNMT: DNA cytosine methyltransferase; IGF: insulin-like growth factor; PSA: prostate specific antigen; ICAM: intercellular adhesion molecule; SP-1: specificity protein 1; ATF-2: activating transcription factor 2; GATA6: GATA-binding factor 6 .
Another natural product which exhibited anti-cancer activity is indol-3-carbinol (I3C), a natural hydrolysis product of glucobrassicin in cruciferous vegetables. 13C was reported to block proliferation of cancer cells by modulating the expression of insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF1R) and insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS1), and to induce protein degradation of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α).8 Moreover, cruciferous vegetables contain sulforaphane (SFN), a naturally occurring organosulfur compound formed by the hydrolysis of glucosinolates that possess anti-cancer and anti-oxidant activities. Epidemiologic studies suggest that cruciferous vegetable intake may lower overall cancer risk, including colon and prostate cancers.9 SFN was shown to block proliferation and induce cell survival and cell cycle arrest in both in vitro and in vivo systems. SFN also exhibited anti-cancer activity in cancer animal models, as evident from the significant reduction in tumor volume in treated animals.10 Another indole compound derived from cruciferous vegetables is brassinin, which was reported to exhibit anti-proliferative effects against cancer in both in vitro and in vivo models11 (Table 1).
Resveratrol (3,4′,5-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene), another widely recognized natural product, is a polyphenolic found in grapes, showing chemo-preventive properties against several cancers, heart diseases, inflammation, and viral infections. Resveratrol was reported to block proliferation, promote cell cycle arrest, and induce apoptosis in cancer cells, mediated by the suppression of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 signaling pathway, p53, Rb/E2F, cyclins, and CDKs. Furthermore, resveratrol affects the activity of transcriptional factors involved in proliferation and stress responses, such as NF-κB, activator protein 1 (AP1) and Egr1, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and tyrosine kinases (e.g. Src), leading to apoptosis induction.12–15 In addition, resveratrol also inhibits cellular proliferation of prostate cancer cells in both androgen receptor (AR)-dependent and independent mechanisms.Resveratrol inhibits AR transcriptional activity and stimulates phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression and decreased AKT phosphorylation16 (Table 1).
Drinking green tea is also associated with a decreased frequency of cancer development, mainly due to the presence of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and other polyphenols. EGCG suppresses androgen receptor expression and signaling via several growth factor receptors. Moreover, EGCG blocks nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB.17
Genistein is an isoflavone found in soy. Soy consumption is associated with a lower incidence of a number of cancers, including colon cancer which is believed to be mediated by genistein. Genistein was reported to inhibit cancer progression and block proliferation, in part by attenuating the negative effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on forkheadbox O3 (FOXO3) activity.18 However, its therapeutic actions in vivo has been questioned due to contradictory reports from animal studies. Recent in vivo data argue that genistein exhibited a cancer promoting effect19 (Table 1).
Ellagitannins are bioactive polyphenols found in berries and pomegranate fruit which have attracted recent attention due to their anti-cancer and anti-atherosclerotic, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammatory bioactivities. Ellagitannins are not absorbed intact into the bloodstream but are hydrolyzed to ellagic acid. They are also metabolized by gut flora into urolithins which are conjugated in the liver and excreted in the urine. These urolithins are also bioactive and inhibit cancer cell proliferation, mediated in part by interfering with the activity of the NF-κB pathway. In clinical studies, pomegranate juice administration led to a decreased rate of prostate specific antigen (PSA) rise after primary treatment with surgery or radiation.20 Moreover, urolithin, an ellagitannins derivative, significantly inhibited testosterone-induced MCF-7aro (MCF-7 that over-expresses aromatase protein) cell proliferation, probably by exhibiting anti-aromatase activity21 (Table 1).
Epidemiological studies have shown that the consumption of lycopene is inversely related to human prostate cancer. Moreover, experimental studies have shown that lycopene inhibits the growth of breast, prostate, and endometrial cancer cells with regulation of cell-cycle-related genes, mediated by interfering with NF-κB activity.22 In colon cancer cells, lycopene was reported to inhibit the activity of AKT signaling23 and consequently induced apoptosis.24 In addition, it has been reported that lycopene inhibited insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) mediated AKT and AR signaling in rat prostate cancer.25 Clinical trials have revealed that lycopene supplements could reduce tumor size and PSA level in localized prostate cancers,26 consistent with the down-regulation of AR nuclear translocation found during in vitro studies (Table 1).
Moreover, a widely recognized nutritional dietary supplement called Propolis made by honeybees and containing flavonoids, phenolic acids and esters, and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) exerted a variety of anti-cancer activities by modulating cell proliferation; induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis27 mediated by inhibition of NF-κB, PI3K, and p53 signaling pathways;28–30 and reduction in phosphorylated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein in breast cancer cell lines.31 Furthermore, the presence of CAPE augmented activity of docetaxel and paclitaxel in prostate cancer cells that was mediated by interfering with AKT, ERK, and ER-α activity32 (Table 1).
Natural products interfering with cancer angiogenesis
Angiogenesis is a physiological process involving the growth of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels. It is a normal process in growth and development as well as in wound healing. However, this is also a fundamental step in the transition of tumors from a dormant state to a malignant state. Tumors induce angiogenesis by secreting various growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which induce capillary growth into the tumor and allow it to grow by supplying nutrients and oxygen and removing waste products. In addition, the new vessels allow tumor cells to escape into the circulation and lodge in other organs (i.e. tumor metastases). A vast array of products of natural origin have been shown to have anti-angiogenic potential in preclinical models,33 including Artemisia annua (Chinese wormwood), Viscum album (European mistletoe), Curcuma longa (curcumin), Scutellariabaicalensis (Chinese skullcap), resveratrol and proanthocyanidin (grape seed extract), Magnolia officinalis (Chinese magnolia tree), Camellia sinensis (green tea), Ginkgo biloba, quercetin, Poriacocos, Zingiberofficinalis (ginger), Panax ginseng, Rabdosiarubescenshora(Rabdosia), and Chinese destagnation herbs34,35 (Table 1).
Quercetin, at non-toxic concentrations, was reported to significantly inhibit micro-vessel sprouting, endothelial cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and tube formation, which are key events in the process of angiogenesis. Furthermore, quercetin exhibited anti-angiogenic activity in ex vivo angiogenesis assays, using the chicken egg chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. Moreover, quercetin also exhibited in vivo anti-tumor activity manifested by significant reduction of tumor size in a xenograft mouse model by targeting angiogenesis36 (Table 1).
Green tea polyphenols down-regulated the activity of a number of key enzymes, including MAPK and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling, leading to blocking the proliferation of endothelial cells.17 Also, ellagitannin-rich pomegranate extract was demonstrated to inhibit the proliferation of endothelial cells and to block tumor-associated angiogenesis in animal models.37
Indirubin, the active component of a traditional Chinese herbal medicine, Banlangen, exhibited anti-angiogenic activity when tested in the CAM assay and mouse corneal model. Moreover, indirubin inhibited endothelial cell migration, tube formation, and in vitro cell survival38 (Table 1).
Curcumin was reported to down-regulate the expression of the VEGF and MMP9 genes that are associated with angiogenesis.39 Additionally, curcumin interfered with the activity of both MMP2 and MMP9 and, consequently, reduced degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM),40 leading to a reduction in the levels of released angiogenic factors stored in the ECM. Furthermore, curcumin also inhibits growth factor receptors, such as EGFR and VEGFR, and the other intracellular signaling tyrosine kinases implicated in angiogenesis. Recent reports implicated curcumin in decreasing the gelatinolytic activities of MMP9. In addition, treatment with curcumin inhibited glioma-induced angiogenesis.41The membrane-bound enzyme CD13 (aminopeptidase N) is found in blood vessels undergoing active angiogenesis. Curcumin binds to CD13 and blocks its activity, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis and invasion of tumor cells42,43 (Table 1).
13-cis-retinoic acid significantly inhibited in vitro angiogenesis, as well as micro-vessel sprouting, vascular endothelial (VE) cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation.44
Resveratrol inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis by disruption of reactive oxygen species–dependent Src kinase activation and subsequent VE-cadherin tyrosine phosphorylation.45,46 Edible berries contain high concentrations of proanthocyanidin which inhibits tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α-induced VEGF expression. Feeding proanthocyanidins to mice with tumor xenografts resulted in reduced intratumoral microvasculature47–49 (Table 1).
In addition to its effect on cell proliferation, EGFR is also implicated in cancer angiogenesis.50EGF stimulates urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression, which is involved in angiogenesis promotion. Genistein, curcumin, resveratrol, and quercetin were reported to inhibit the effects of EGF.45,51–54 In in vitro systems, genistein and curcumin inhibit EGF-stimulated uPA production. Another family member of EGFR, the HER2/neu gene, is amplified in more than 30% of patients with breast cancer and is correlated with higher levels of angiogenesis.55 The activity of herceptin, a drug that inhibits HER2/neu expressing breast cancer cells, can be further enhanced by oleic acid.56 Interestingly, emodin, a natural constituent of Polygonummultiflorum and aloe, inhibits HER2/neu expression and exhibits selective cellular toxicity to cancer cells57 (Table 1).
Natural products interfering with cancer invasion and metastasis
Metastasis, the spread of cancer cells from the primary tumor to distant organs, is a multi-step process in which cancer cells must invade through the extracellular matrix, intravasate into the bloodstream, survive transport through the circulatory system and, finally, extravasate to distant organs.58 Aberrant activation of a developmental program, termed the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), has recently been recognized as an important driver of the metastatic process. EMT is a conserved developmental process in which epithelial cells lose E-cadherin-mediated cell–cell contacts and apical–basal polarity and become motile and invasive. This program is accompanied by expression changes in a variety of genes.
SFN was reported to synergize with the multi-kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, in reducing tumor size of pancreatic cancer in an animal model, due to the blockage of proliferation and angiogenesis, and down-regulation of EMT modulators59,60 (Table 1).
In addition, the bioactive component, grape seed proanthocyanidins (GSPs), interfered with the invasion potential of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The inhibition of cell invasion by GSPs was associated with the reversal of the EMT process.61
Salvianolic acid B (Sal B) is a water-soluble component from Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge), a traditional Chinese herb reported to prevent tubular EMT in the fibrotic kidney62 (Table 1).
Curcumin is reported to possess anti-invasive activity which is partly mediated by down-regulation of MMP2 and up-regulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP1),63 enzymes that are involved in the regulation of tumor cell invasion.
Experimental studies have shown that lycopene exhibited anti-cancer activity,22 that mediated, in part, by inhibiting NF-κB-mediated expression of MMP9, leading to the inhibition of invasion of cancer cells.64 In addition, EGCG reduced cancer cell invasiveness through the inhibition of Wnt signaling65 (Table 1).
Moreover, CAPE found in the nutritional dietary supplement Propolis is reported to interfere with cancer metastasis and invasion by modulating activities of MMP266 (Table 1).
Natural products targeting cancer stem cells
The present understanding of cancer biology argues for the existence of a small portion of cells that show stem cell–like characters. These cells constitute a limited subpopulation of primitive undifferentiated cancer cells that have the ability to self-renew, are tumorigenic and invasive, undergo asymmetrical divisions, and generate all aspects of cancers. Like non-malignant stem cells, putative cancer stem cells (CSC) show remarkable resistance to radiation and chemotherapy.67 A number of reports implicate stem-like cells as a potential cause of chemo resistance.68 The EMT process that regulates cancer metastasis is also implicated in the generation of CSC and has been associated with resistance to chemotherapy.69 In order to cure cancer, it is necessary to eliminate CSC in addition to differentiated cancer cells, to decrease metastasis, reduce recurrence, and improve patient survival.
Diverse dietary constituents, such as vitamins A and D, genistein, EGCG, SFN, piperine, theanine, choline, and curcumin, have been shown to modify self-renewal properties of CSC and influence proliferation, as well as other functions in CSC,70 suggesting the potential of using these dietary components in preventing resistance and cancer recurrence. Wnt signaling and modulation of β-catenin expression is essential for CSC. A number of phenolic compounds, such as CAPE, curcumin, resveratrol, quercetin, isoflavone, fisetin, EGCG, and isoflavone, were able to inhibit Wnt and β-catenin signaling65 (Table 1).
Resveratrol has been shown to significantly decrease the level of β-catenin in the nucleus of cancer cells71 (Table 1). Recent studies in breast cancer cells demonstrated that curcumin inhibited aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH)-expressing breast CSC self-renewal but did not cause toxicity to differentiated cells by suppressing Wnt signaling. Likewise, curcumin has been shown to inhibit CD133 positive medulloblastoma, glioblastoma, pancreatic, and colon CSC proliferation.72,73 Moreover, a recent report demonstrated that SFN suppresses the activity of NF-κB/GATA6 and thus affects proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) as well as CSC.74Others have reported activity of SFN against stem cells that is mediated by blocking the Wnt/β-catenin self-renewal pathway72 (Table 1).
Natural products modulate epigenetic modifications
Epigenetics is defined as a heritable modification to the DNA that regulates chromosome architecture and modulates gene expression without changes to the underlying nucleotide sequence, ultimately determining phenotype from genotype. DNA methylation and post-translational histone modifications are classical levels of epigenetic regulation. Epigenetic changes in DNA methylation patterns at CpG sites or deregulated chromatin states of tumor promoting genes and non-coding RNAs emerge as major governing factors in tumor progression and cancer drug sensitivity. DNA methylation in mammals is an enzymatic process primarily mediated by active DNA cytosine methyltransferase (DNMT).75 During cell division, methylation patterns in the parental strand of DNA are maintained in the daughter strand by the action of DNMT1, which catalyses the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the methyl donor, to the cytosine residues, restoring the symmetrically methylated CpG dinucleotide pair. Aberrant patterns and dysregulation of DNA methylation cause stable, heritable transcriptional silencing of the associated gene during tumorigenesis.76,77 Epigenetic variability at specific transcription regulation sites appear to be susceptible to modulation by nutritional changes.78 Therefore, dietary components which can affect the process of DNA methylation may influence tumorigenesis by regulation of the expression of certain key genes. Currently, the best evidence to show that nutritional components can modulate epigenetic status of mammal cells comes from studies with mice carrying the agouti viable yellow gene.79,80 Various environmental factors, such as nutrition, remodel our epigenomes lifelong in a beneficial or detrimental way. Since epigenetic marks are reversible in contrast to genetic defects, chemo-preventive nutritional polyphenols are currently evaluated for their ability to reverse adverse epigenetic marks in cancer cells to attenuate tumorigenesis progression, prevent metastasis, or sensitize for drug sensitivity.81,82
Nutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism, namely folate, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, riboflavin, methionine, choline, and betaine, are involved in DNA methylation by regulating the levels of the universal methyl donor SAM and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). Other nutrients and bioactive food components, such as retinoic acid, resveratrol, curcumin, SFN, and tea polyphenols, can modulate epigenetic patterns by altering the levels of SAM and SAH or affecting the catalytic activity of enzymes involved in DNA methylation and histone modifications.83,84 Cancer and other age-related diseases are associated with profound changes in epigenetic patterns, although it is not yet known whether these changes are programmatic or stochastic in nature85 (Table 2).
Table 2.
Natural product | Epigenetic activity |
---|---|
EGCG | DNMT inhibitor105,106 |
HAT107 | |
HDAC3107 | |
Parthenolide | DNMT inhibitor106 |
Folate | Methyl group donor89,90,108 |
Genistein | DNMT inhibitor91,92,94–96,109 |
HAT inhibitor94–96,109 | |
HDAC6110 | |
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) | HDAC inhibitor31 |
Curcumin | HDAC inhibitor111 |
HAT inhibitor111 | |
DNMT inhibitor106,112,113 | |
Selenium | Decrease DNMT1 expression114 |
Affect homocysteine availability114 | |
Methionine | Methyl group donor108,115 |
Choline | Methyl group donor108,115 |
Betaine | Methyl group donor108,115 |
Folate | Methyl group donor115,108 |
Vitamin B12 | Methyl group donor115,108 |
Resveratrol | Activating SIRT-1116 |
Sulforaphane | HDAC inhibitor117 |
EGCG: epigallocatechin gallate; DNMT: DNA cytosine methyltransferase; HAT: histone acetyltransferases; HDAC: histone deacetylases.
The green tea polyphenol, EGCG, is believed to be a key active ingredient for cancer inhibition through epigenetic control. It has been found that EGCG can reverse CpG island hypermethylation of various methylation-silenced genes and reactivate these gene expressions.86 It was also reported that consumption of polyphenols could lead to a decrease in the availability of SAM and an increase in SAH and homocysteine levels. Currently, green tea extracts have been applied in clinical trials, including oral cancer prevention, indicating that tea polyphenols could be used in multiple human cancer preventive and therapeutic purposes due to their bioactivities, such as regulating epigenetic factors87 (Table 2).
A methyl donor diet that is used for the synthesis of SAM, including folate and vitamin B12, is expected to affect DNA methylation. Studies on feeding in rats with diets deficient in folate showed a significant genome-wide DNA hypomethylation, as well as gene-specific DNA hypermethylation88,89 (Table 2).
The soybean product, genistein, has been shown to be associated with a lower incidence and mortality rate of breast cancer in Asian women who consume soybean products as their daily diet.90,91 Genistein is believed to be a chemo-preventive agent against various types of cancer cells.92 It is becoming clear that genistein exerts multiple effects on cancer cell growth, including regulation of gene expression, by modulating epigenetic events such as DNA methylation and/or chromatin modification93–95 (Table 2). However, the anti-cancer properties of genistein in breast cancer have raised concerns because of its estrogen-like effect that may be contraindicated for women at high risk of breast cancer. Studies, both in epidemiology and animals, have confirmed that exposure to a soy diet in women in early life greatly impacts breast cancer risk, suggesting exposure time is essential for genistein to exert its effects on breast cancer prevention.
Selenium is an essential trace element with both anti-oxidant and pro-apoptotic properties.96,97 Davis et al.98 have demonstrated that in the colon and liver, selenium deficiency causes global hypomethylation and in addition promotes methylation of p53 and p16 genes, suggesting that impacting DNA methylation may be a crucial mechanism of selenium for cancer prevention. Selenium has been shown to inhibit DNMT through direct interaction and indirect action by influencing plasma homocysteine concentrations and the SAM:SAH ratio.99,100
Some of the dietary agents, such as butyrate, flavonoids, and curcumin, are capable of altering the epigenetic landscape which can modulate gene/microRNA (miRNA) transcription and subsequently trigger changes in cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival101,102 (Table 2). Interestingly, several investigators have recently begun to explore how bioactive dietary agents alter the inter-regulatory patterns between promoter regions of miRNAs and several genes.103
Natural products’ activity mediated by modulation of miRNA expression
miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs (~22 nucleotides long) that play a critical role in basic biological processes, including carcinogenesis. miRNAs are found in both plants and animals and regulate protein expression by acting through complementarity to 3′ un-translated regions (UTRs) of their “target” mRNAs, which results in the repression of target gene expression post-transcriptionally.104 Currently, more than 800 human and mouse miRNAs have been identified that are involved in almost all human malignancies.105 Furthermore, miRNAs have been correlated to tumor location, mutation status of several tumor suppressor genes/oncogenes, and cancer disease stages. Dietary intake of natural products contributes to disease prevention and therapy, partly due to their capacity to alter the expression of miRNAs and consequently regulate cellular signaling and biological behavior. Curcumin, isoflavone, 3,3′-diinodolylmethane (DIM), I3C, and EGCG are typical examples of natural agents that have been demonstrated to regulate miRNA expression.106
A growing body of evidence demonstrates that a high intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) is protective against tumorigenesis.107 In contrast, diets rich in n-6 PUFAs (linoleic acid (LA) and arachidonic acid (AA)) enhance both the initiation and promotion of cancer.108 Recently, miRNA expression of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-107, miR-191, and miR-324-5p were modulated by a n-3 PUFA-enriched diet,109 arguing that miRNAs may be involved in mediating some of the anti-oncogenic and chemo-protective properties of PUFAs (Table 3).
Table 3.
Natural product | Up-regulated miRNA | Down-regulated miRNA | Target genes and pathways |
---|---|---|---|
EGCG | miR-16, let-7c, miR-18, miR-25, miR-92,137 miR-210138 | miR-129, miR-196, miR-200, miR-342, and miR-526137 | HIF-1α |
Genistein | miR-200130 | ZEB1, Slug, Vimentin, EMT regulators | |
Resveratrol | miR-663, miR-21, miR-25, miR-92a, and miR-520h134 | EMT, TGF-β,FOXC2134 | |
Curcumin | miR-15a, miR-15b,132 miRNA-22,129 miR-200130 | miR-21,131 miR-199a129 | Bcl2, Cdc25A, EMT |
Butyrate | miR-17~92, miR~18b-106a, and miR-106b~25124 | ||
All-trans-retinoic acid | miR-186, miR-215, miR-223125 | miR-17, miR-25, miR-93, miR-193, and miR-181b126 | |
n-3 PUFA | let-7d, miR-15b, miR-107, miR-191, and miR-324-5123 |
miRNA: microRNA; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids; EMT: epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; HIF: hypoxia-inducible factor; ZEB1: zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1; FOXC2: forkhead box protein C2; TGF: transforming growth factor.
Butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid produced via fermentation of dietary fiber, exhibited cancer protective effects which are believed to be mediated in part by modulating miRNA expression,110 such as miR-17~92, miR~18b-106a, and miR-106b~25 clusters. The same applies to all-trans-retinoic acid, the most biologically active metabolites of vitamin A; up-regulated miR-186, miR-215, and miR-223;111 and down-regulated miR-17, miR-25, miR-93, miR-193, and miR-181b112 (Table 3).
Polyphenols are ubiquitous secondary metabolites found in dietary nutrition that exhibit chemo-prevention activity against a number of chronic diseases.113 Some studies have demonstrated that curcumin has protective properties against several types of cancers by the modification of gene expression,114 as well as up-regulation of a subset of miRNAs such as miRNA-22 and down-regulation of another subset of miRNAs such as miR-199a.115 Moreover, DIM and curcumin have been shown to increase the level of the miR-200 family in pancreatic cancer cells, which is involved in the regulation of EMT and invasion behavior, and which was also mechanistically linked to stem cell signatures.116 Curcumin and its synthetic analog, diflourinated curcumin (CDF), down-regulated miR-21 expression117 and reduced the expression of Bcl2 by up-regulating miR-15a and miR-15b.118 DIM was reported to increase the expression of miR-21 and consequently reduced the expression of its target, Cdc25A.119 In addition, resveratrol was also reported to affect the EMT process and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and forkhead box protein C2 (FOXC2) expression by regulating miR-663, miR-21, miR-25, miR-92a, and miR-520h.120 Furthermore, the anti-cancer activity of ellagitannins was shown to be mediated in part by regulating the expression of a number of miRNAs121 (Table 3).
The EGCG compound exerts its anti-cancer activity by inducing apoptosis, suppressing NF-κB, up- or down-regulating tumor suppressor genes/oncogenes, and modulating epigenetic changes of the chromatin.122 Interestingly, some EGCG activities are mediated by affecting the expression of miRNAs such as miR-16, let-7c, miR-18, miR-25, and miR-92 which were up-regulated and miR-129, miR-196, miR-200, miR-342, and miR-526 which were down-regulated.123 Moreover, EGCG affects the expression of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) pathway, an effect which is mediated by regulation of miR-210124 (Table 3).
Soy isoflavones, such as daidzein, genistein, and glycitein, have been reported to have anti-carcinogenic effects mediated by inhibition of cell growth, invasion, and metastasis.125 Genistein regulates the expression of miRNAs implicated in controlling cancer cell proliferation,126 and also up-regulating miR-200, which was associated with the down-regulation of validated targets zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), slug, and vimentin, known to play a role in the EMT process116 (Table 3).
Concluding remarks
Many natural products or dietary substances exhibit anti-cancer activity in in vitro systems against a variety of cancer cell lines, including leukemia, lymphoma, breast, prostate, liver, lung, and myeloma cells. The anti-cancer activity of natural products includes the inhibition of proliferation, induction of apoptosis, induction of cell cycle arrest, inhibition of invasive behavior, and suppression of tumor angiogenesis in many experimental systems. We suggest a need for more in-depth studies that focus on the most promising herbal-derived substances, such as curcumin, genistein, and others. Preliminary clinical data have shown promising efficacies of natural products in cancer treatment as well as in other indications. Yet, few of these natural products have been subjected to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) under the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice Guidelines to determine their efficacy and/or safety. The data summarized here show that many nonclinical in vitro and in vivo studies on herbal medicines have commonly supported the traditional therapeutic claims. However, systematic reviews of the study protocols or data interpretation and validation are lacking. We believe that there is a need to explore the full potential of the dietary supplements of natural products, and to assess their safety and efficacy in well-designed, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials as stand-alone treatments or in combination with other treatments. To achieve this goal, standardization of pure natural products or active extracts is an important element. Because the composition and amount of biologically active substances depend on sites of production, cultivation conditions, and extraction procedures, standardization will help the acceptance of natural products as suitable for cancer treatment. However, there is a need for the identification and prediction of potential herb–drug interactions.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests: No author has any conflict of interest to declare.
Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- 1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM, Snader KM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981–2002. J Nat Prod 2003; 66: 1022–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Butler MS. Natural products to drugs: natural product-derived compounds in clinical trials. Nat Prod Rep 2008; 25: 475–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bar-Sela G, Epelbaum R, Schaffer M. Curcumin as an anti-cancer agent: review of the gap between basic and clinical applications. Curr Med Chem 2010; 17: 190–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jagtap S, Meganathan K, Wagh V, et al. Chemoprotective mechanism of the natural compounds, epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate, quercetin and curcumin against cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Med Chem 2009; 16: 1451–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Johnson SM, Gulhati P, Arrieta I, et al. Curcumin inhibits proliferation of colorectal carcinoma by modulating Akt/mTOR signaling. Anticancer Res 2009; 29: 3185–3190. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Beevers CS, Zhou H, Huang S. Hitting the golden TORget: curcumin’s effects on mTOR signaling. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2013; 13: 988–994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Marconett CN, Singhal AK, Sundar SN, et al. Indole-3-carbinol disrupts estrogen receptor-alpha dependent expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 and proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 363: 74–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, et al. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 3983–3988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Qazi A, Pal J, Maitah M, et al. Anticancer activity of a broccoli derivative, sulforaphane, in Barrett adenocarcinoma: potential use in chemoprevention and as adjuvant in chemotherapy. Transl Oncol 2010; 3: 389–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Izutani Y, Yogosawa S, Sowa Y, et al. Brassinin induces G1 phase arrest through increase of p21 and p27 by inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathway in human colon cancer cells. Int J Oncol 2012; 40: 816–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. De Leo A, Arena G, Stecca C, et al. Resveratrol inhibits proliferation and survival of Epstein Barr virus-infected Burkitt’s lymphoma cells depending on viral latency program. Mol Cancer Res 2011; 9: 1346–1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ding XZ, Adrian TE. Resveratrol inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. Pancreas 2002; 25: e71–e76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li Y, Liu J, Liu X, et al. Resveratrol-induced cell inhibition of growth and apoptosis in MCF7 human breast cancer cells are associated with modulation of phosphorylated Akt and caspase-9. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2006; 135: 181–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Signorelli P, Ghidoni R. Resveratrol as an anticancer nutrient: molecular basis, open questions and promises. J Nutr Biochem 2005; 16: 449–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wang Y, Romigh T, He X, et al. Resveratrol regulates the PTEN/AKT pathway through androgen receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms in prostate cancer cell lines. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 4319–4329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Beltz LA, Bayer DK, Moss AL, et al. Mechanisms of cancer prevention by green and black tea polyphenols. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2006; 6: 389–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Pan H, Zhou W, He W, et al. Genistein inhibits MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cell growth by inhibiting NF-kappaB activity via the Notch-1 pathway. Int J Mol Med 2012; 30: 337–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nakamura H, Wang Y, Kurita T, et al. Genistein increases epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and promotes tumor progression in advanced human prostate cancer. PLoS One 2011; 6: e20034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Heber D. Multitargeted therapy of cancer by ellagitannins. Cancer Lett 2008; 269: 262–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Adams LS, Zhang Y, Seeram NP, et al. Pomegranate ellagitannin-derived compounds exhibit antiproliferative and antiaromatase activity in breast cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2010; 3: 108–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hung CF, Huang TF, Chen BH, et al. Lycopene inhibits TNF-alpha-induced endothelial ICAM-1 expression and monocyte-endothelial adhesion. Eur J Pharmacol 2008; 586: 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tang FY, Shih CJ, Cheng LH, et al. Lycopene inhibits growth of human colon cancer cells via suppression of the Akt signaling pathway. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008; 52: 646–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Palozza P, Sheriff A, Serini S, et al. Lycopene induces apoptosis in immortalized fibroblasts exposed to tobacco smoke condensate through arresting cell cycle and down-regulating cyclin D1, pAKT and pBad. Apoptosis 2005; 10: 1445–1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Liu X, Allen JD, Arnold JT, et al. Lycopene inhibits IGF-I signal transduction and growth in normal prostate epithelial cells by decreasing DHT-modulated IGF-I production in co-cultured reactive stromal cells. Carcinogenesis 2008; 29: 816–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kucuk O, Sarkar FH, Djuric Z, et al. Effects of lycopene supplementation in patients with localized prostate cancer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2002; 227: 881–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chen MJ, Chang WH, Lin CC, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester induces apoptosis of human pancreatic cancer cells involving caspase and mitochondrial dysfunction. Pancreatology 2008; 8: 566–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wu J, Omene C, Karkoszka J, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2011; 308: 43–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Omene CO, Wu J, Frenkel K. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) derived from propolis, a honeybee product, inhibits growth of breast cancer stem cells. Invest New Drugs 2012; 30: 1279–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Onori P, DeMorrow S, Gaudio E, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester decreases cholangiocarcinoma growth by inhibition of NF-kappaB and induction of apoptosis. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 565–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Omene C, Kalac M, Wu J, et al. Propolis and its active component, Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE), modulate breast cancer therapeutic targets via an epigenetically mediated mechanism of action. J Cancer Sci Ther 2013; 5: 334–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tolba MF, Esmat A, Al-Abd AM, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester synergistically enhances docetaxel and paclitaxel cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells. IUBMB Life 2013; 65: 716–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Neal CP, Berry DP, Doucas H, et al. Clinical aspects of natural anti-angiogenic drugs. Curr Drug Targets 2006; 7: 371–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sagar SM, Yance D, Wong RK. Natural health products that inhibit angiogenesis: a potential source for investigational new agents to treat cancer–part 1. Curr Oncol 2006; 13: 14–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Elluru SR, Duong Van Huyen JP, Delignat S, et al. Antiangiogenic properties of Viscum album extracts are associated with endothelial cytotoxicity. Anticancer Res 2009; 29: 2945–2950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Pratheeshkumar P, Budhraja A, Son YO, et al. Quercetin inhibits angiogenesis mediated human prostate tumor growth by targeting VEGFR-2 regulated AKT/mTOR/P70S6K signaling pathways. PLoS One 2012; 7: e47516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sartippour MR, Seeram NP, Rao JY, et al. Ellagitannin-rich pomegranate extract inhibits angiogenesis in prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo. Int J Oncol 2008; 32: 475–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zhang X, Song Y, Wu Y, et al. Indirubin inhibits tumor growth by antitumor angiogenesis via blocking VEGFR2-mediated JAK/STAT3 signaling in endothelial cell. Int J Cancer 2011; 129: 2502–2511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kim JH, Shim JS, Lee SK, et al. Microarray-based analysis of anti-angiogenic activity of demethoxycurcumin on human umbilical vein endothelial cells: crucial involvement of the down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase. Jpn J Cancer Res 2002; 93: 1378–1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chen HW, Yu SL, Chen JJ, et al. Anti-invasive gene expression profile of curcumin in lung adenocarcinoma based on a high throughput microarray analysis. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 65: 99–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Perry MC, Demeule M, Regina A, et al. Curcumin inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in glioblastoma xenografts. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010; 54: 1192–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Gururaj AE, Belakavadi M, Venkatesh DA, et al. Molecular mechanisms of anti-angiogenic effect of curcumin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 297: 934–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hahm ER, Gho YS, Park S, et al. Synthetic curcumin analogs inhibit activator protein-1 transcription and tumor-induced angiogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 321: 337–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Guruvayoorappan C, Kuttan G. 13 cis-retinoic acid regulates cytokine production and inhibits angiogenesis by disrupting endothelial cell migration and tube formation. J Exp Ther Oncol 2008; 7: 173–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Igura K, Ohta T, Kuroda Y, et al. Resveratrol and quercetin inhibit angiogenesis in vitro. Cancer Lett 2001; 171: 11–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lin MT, Yen ML, Lin CY, et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis by resveratrol through interruption of Src-dependent vascular endothelial cadherin tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 64: 1029–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Roy S, Khanna S, Alessio HM, et al. Anti-angiogenic property of edible berries. Free Radic Res 2002; 36: 1023–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Stohs SJ, et al. Free radicals and grape seed proanthocyanidin extract: importance in human health and disease prevention. Toxicology 2000; 148: 187–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Singh RP, Tyagi AK, Dhanalakshmi S, et al. Grape seed extract inhibits advanced human prostate tumor growth and angiogenesis and upregulates insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 733–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Casanova ML, Larcher F, Casanova B, et al. A critical role for ras-mediated, epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent angiogenesis in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 3402–3407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Smith PC, Santibanez JF, Morales JP, et al. Epidermal growth factor stimulates urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression in human gingival fibroblasts. Possible modulation by genistein and curcumin. J Periodontal Res 2004; 39: 380–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Banerjee T, Van der Vliet A, Ziboh VA. Downregulation of COX-2 and iNOS by amentoflavone and quercetin in A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2002; 66: 485–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Huynh H, Nguyen TT, Chan E, et al. Inhibition of ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 expression by quercetin prevents transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha)- and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced human PC-3 prostate cancer cell proliferation. Int J Oncol 2003; 23: 821–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Ma ZS, Huynh TH, Ng CP, et al. Reduction of CWR22 prostate tumor xenograft growth by combined tamoxifen-quercetin treatment is associated with inhibition of angiogenesis and cellular proliferation. Int J Oncol 2004; 24: 1297–1304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Blackwell KL, Dewhirst MW, Liotcheva V, et al. HER-2 gene amplification correlates with higher levels of angiogenesis and lower levels of hypoxia in primary breast tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 4083–4088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Menendez JA, Vellon L, Colomer R, et al. Oleic acid, the main monounsaturated fatty acid of olive oil, suppresses Her-2/neu (erbB-2) expression and synergistically enhances the growth inhibitory effects of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in breast cancer cells with Her-2/neu oncogene amplification. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 359–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wasserman L, Avigad S, Beery E, et al. The effect of aloe emodin on the proliferation of a new merkel carcinoma cell line. Am J Dermatopathol 2002; 24: 17–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 563–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Rausch V, Liu L, Kallifatidis G, et al. Synergistic activity of sorafenib and sulforaphane abolishes pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 5004–5013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hunakova L, Sedlakova O, Cholujova D, et al. Modulation of markers associated with aggressive phenotype in MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells by sulforaphane. Neoplasma 2009; 56: 548–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Sun Q, Prasad R, Rosenthal E, et al. Grape seed proanthocyanidins inhibit the invasive potential of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cells by targeting EGFR expression and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011; 11: 134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Wang QL, Tao YY, Yuan JL, et al. Salvianolic acid B prevents epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through the TGF-beta1 signal transduction pathway in vivo and in vitro. BMC Cell Biol 2010; 11: 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Shao ZM, Shen ZZ, Liu CH, et al. Curcumin exerts multiple suppressive effects on human breast carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 2002; 98: 234–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Huang CS, Fan YE, Lin CY, et al. Lycopene inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and down-regulates the binding activity of nuclear factor-kappa B and stimulatory protein-1. J Nutr Biochem 2007; 18: 449–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kim J, Zhang X, Rieger-Christ KM, et al. Suppression of Wnt signaling by the green tea compound (-)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate (EGCG) in invasive breast cancer cells. Requirement of the transcriptional repressor HBP1. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 10865–10875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Lee KW, Kang NJ, Kim JH, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits invasion and expression of matrix metalloproteinase in SK-Hep1 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting nuclear factor kappa B. Genes Nutr 2008; 2: 319–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ribacka C, Pesonen S, Hemminki A. Cancer, stem cells, and oncolytic viruses. Ann Med 2008; 40: 496–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Huber M, Bahr I, Kratzschmar JR, et al. Comparison of proteomic and genomic analyses of the human breast cancer cell line T47D and the antiestrogen-resistant derivative T47D-r. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004; 3: 43–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Ahmed N, Abubaker K, Findlay J, et al. Epithelial mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like phenotypes facilitate chemoresistance in recurrent ovarian cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2010; 10: 268–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Kim YS, Farrar W, Colburn NH, et al. Cancer stem cells: potential target for bioactive food components. J Nutr Biochem 2012; 23: 691–698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Hope C, Planutis K, Planutiene M, et al. Low concentrations of resveratrol inhibit Wnt signal throughput in colon-derived cells: implications for colon cancer prevention. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008; 52(Suppl. 1): S52–S61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Li Y, Zhang T, Korkaya H, et al. Sulforaphane, a dietary component of broccoli/broccoli sprouts, inhibits breast cancer stem cells. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 2580–2590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Nautiyal J, Kanwar SS, Yu Y, et al. Combination of dasatinib and curcumin eliminates chemo-resistant colon cancer cells. J Mol Signal 2011; 6: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Kwon JS, Joung H, Kim YS, et al. Sulforaphane inhibits restenosis by suppressing inflammation and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 2012; 225: 41–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Bestor TH. The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9: 2395–2402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, et al. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature 2004; 429: 457–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Baylin SB, Ohm JE. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer—a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction? Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6: 107–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Early nutrition, epigenetic changes at transposons and imprinted genes, and enhanced susceptibility to adult chronic diseases. Nutrition 2004; 20: 63–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Yen TT, Gill AM, Frigeri LG, et al. Obesity, diabetes, and neoplasia in yellow A(vy)/- mice: ectopic expression of the agouti gene. FASEB J 1994; 8: 479–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Michaud EJ, Van Vugt MJ, Bultman SJ, et al. Differential expression of a new dominant agouti allele (Aiapy) is correlated with methylation state and is influenced by parental lineage. Genes Dev 1994; 8: 1463–1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Vanden Berghe W. Epigenetic impact of dietary polyphenols in cancer chemoprevention: lifelong remodeling of our epigenomes. Pharmacol Res 2012; 65: 565–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Huang J, Plass C, Gerhauser C. Cancer chemoprevention by targeting the epigenome. Curr Drug Targets 2011; 12: 1925–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Berletch JB, Liu C, Love WK, et al. Epigenetic and genetic mechanisms contribute to telomerase inhibition by EGCG. J Cell Biochem 2008; 103: 509–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Mittal A, Piyathilake C, Hara Y, et al. Exceptionally high protection of photocarcinogenesis by topical application of (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in hydrophilic cream in SKH-1 hairless mouse model: relationship to inhibition of UVB-induced global DNA hypomethylation. Neoplasia 2003; 5: 555–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ross SA. Evidence for the relationship between diet and cancer. Exp Oncol 2010; 32: 137–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Fang MZ, Wang Y, Ai N, et al. Tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits DNA methyltransferase and reactivates methylation-silenced genes in cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 7563–7570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Yuasa Y, Nagasaki H, Akiyama Y, et al. Relationship between CDX2 gene methylation and dietary factors in gastric cancer patients. Carcinogenesis 2005; 26: 193–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kim YI. Nutritional epigenetics: impact of folate deficiency on DNA methylation and colon cancer susceptibility. J Nutr 2005; 135: 2703–2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Stempak JM, Sohn KJ, Chiang EP, et al. Cell and stage of transformation-specific effects of folate deficiency on methionine cycle intermediates and DNA methylation in an in vitro model. Carcinogenesis 2005; 26: 981–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Lee HP, Gourley L, Duffy SW, et al. Dietary effects on breast-cancer risk in Singapore. Lancet 1991; 337: 1197–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Fang CY, Tseng M, Daly MB. Correlates of soy food consumption in women at increased risk for breast cancer. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 1552–1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Barnes S. Effect of genistein on in vitro and in vivo models of cancer. J Nutr 1995; 125: 777S–783S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Fang MZ, Chen D, Sun Y, et al. Reversal of hypermethylation and reactivation of p16INK4a, RARbeta, and MGMT genes by genistein and other isoflavones from soy. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 7033–7041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Li Y, Liu L, Andrews LG, et al. Genistein depletes telomerase activity through cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 286–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Majid S, Kikuno N, Nelles J, et al. Genistein induces the p21WAF1/CIP1 and p16INK4a tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer cells by epigenetic mechanisms involving active chromatin modification. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 2736–2744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Clark LC, Cantor KP, Allaway WH. Selenium in forage crops and cancer mortality in U.S. counties. Arch Environ Health 1991; 46: 37–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Clark LC, Combs GF, Jr, Turnbull BW, et al. Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized controlled trial. Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group. JAMA 1996; 276: 1957–1963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Davis CD, Uthus EO, Finley JW. Dietary selenium and arsenic affect DNA methylation in vitro in Caco-2 cells and in vivo in rat liver and colon. J Nutr 2000; 130: 2903–2909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Davis CD, Uthus EO. Dietary selenite and azadeoxycytidine treatments affect dimethylhydrazine-induced aberrant crypt formation in rat colon and DNA methylation in HT-29 cells. J Nutr 2002; 132: 292–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Uthus EO, Ross SA. Dietary selenium affects homocysteine metabolism differently in Fisher-344 rats and CD-1 mice. J Nutr 2007; 137: 1132–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Duthie SJ. Epigenetic modifications and human pathologies: cancer and CVD. Proc Nutr Soc 2011; 70: 47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Fu S, Kurzrock R. Development of curcumin as an epigenetic agent. Cancer 2010; 116: 4670–4676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Tsai KW, Wu CW, Hu LY, et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-34b and miR-129 expression in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 2011; 129: 2600–2610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs—microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6: 259–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, et al. miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: D154–D158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Shah MS, Davidson LA, Chapkin RS. Mechanistic insights into the role of microRNAs in cancer: influence of nutrient crosstalk. Front Genet 2012; 3: 305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. West SG, Krick AL, Klein LC, et al. Effects of diets high in walnuts and flax oil on hemodynamic responses to stress and vascular endothelial function. J Am Coll Nutr 2010; 29: 595–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Whelan J, McEntee MF. Dietary (n-6) PUFA and intestinal tumorigenesis. J Nutr 2004; 134: 3421S–3426S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Davidson LA, Wang N, Shah MS, et al. n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids modulate carcinogen-directed non-coding microRNA signatures in rat colon. Carcinogenesis 2009; 30: 2077–2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Hu S, Dong TS, Dalal SR, et al. The microbe-derived short chain fatty acid butyrate targets miRNA-dependent p21 gene expression in human colon cancer. PLoS One 2011; 6: e16221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Rossi A, D’Urso OF, Gatto G, et al. Non-coding RNAs change their expression profile after Retinoid induced differentiation of the promyelocytic cell line NB4. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3: 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Garzon R, Pichiorri F, Palumbo T, et al. MicroRNA gene expression during retinoic acid-induced differentiation of human acute promyelocytic leukemia. Oncogene 2007; 26: 4148–4157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Spencer JP, Abd El, Mohsen MM, Minihane AM, et al. Biomarkers of the intake of dietary polyphenols: strengths, limitations and application in nutrition research. Br J Nutr 2008; 99: 12–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Lopez-Lazaro M. Anticancer and carcinogenic properties of curcumin: considerations for its clinical development as a cancer chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008; 52(Suppl. 1): S103–S127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Sun M, Estrov Z, Ji Y, et al. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) alters the expression profiles of microRNAs in human pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2008; 7: 464–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Li Y, VandenBoom TG, 2nd, Kong D, et al. Up-regulation of miR-200 and let-7 by natural agents leads to the reversal of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 6704–6712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Bao B, Ali S, Banerjee S, et al. Curcumin analogue CDF inhibits pancreatic tumor growth by switching on suppressor microRNAs and attenuating EZH2 expression. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 335–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Yang J, Cao Y, Sun J, et al. Curcumin reduces the expression of Bcl-2 by upregulating miR-15a and miR-16 in MCF-7 cells. Med Oncol 2010; 27: 1114–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Jin Y. 3,3′-Diindolylmethane inhibits breast cancer cell growth via miR-21-mediated Cdc25A degradation. Mol Cell Biochem 2011; 358: 345–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Hu FW, Tsai LL, Yu CH, et al. Impairment of tumor-initiating stem-like property and reversal of epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation in head and neck cancer by resveratrol treatment. Mol Nutr Food Res 2012; 56: 1247–1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Wen XY, Wu SY, Li ZQ, et al. Ellagitannin (BJA3121), an anti-proliferative natural polyphenol compound, can regulate the expression of MiRNAs in HepG2 cancer cells. Phytother Res 2009; 23: 778–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Surh YJ, Kundu JK, Na HK, et al. Redox-sensitive transcription factors as prime targets for chemoprevention with anti-inflammatory and antioxidative phytochemicals. J Nutr 2005; 135: 2993S–3001S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Tsang JS, Ebert MS, van Oudenaarden A. Genome-wide dissection of microRNA functions and cotargeting networks using gene set signatures. Mol Cell 2010; 38: 140–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Wang H, Bian S, Yang CS. Green tea polyphenol EGCG suppresses lung cancer cell growth through upregulating miR-210 expression caused by stabilizing HIF-1alpha. Carcinogenesis 2011; 32: 1881–1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Dixon RA, Pasinetti GM. Flavonoids and isoflavonoids: from plant biology to agriculture and neuroscience. Plant Physiol 2010; 154: 453–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Parker LP, Taylor DD, Kesterson J, et al. Modulation of microRNA associated with ovarian cancer cells by genistein. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2009; 30: 616–621 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]