Abstract
The fullerene C70 may be considered as the shortest possible nanotube capped by a hemisphere of C60 at each end. Vibrational spectroscopy is a key tool in characterising fullerenes, and C70 has been studied several times and spectral assignments proposed. Unfortunately, many of the modes are either forbidden or have very low infrared or Raman intensity, even if allowed. Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectroscopy is not subject to selection rules, and all the modes are allowed. We have obtained a new INS spectrum from a large sample recorded at the highest resolution available. An advantage of INS spectroscopy is that it is straightforward to calculate the spectral intensity from a model. We demonstrate that all previous assignments are incorrect in at least some respects and propose a new assignment based on periodic density functional theory (DFT) that successfully reproduces the INS, infrared, and Raman spectra.
Keywords: Ab initio calculations, C70, fullerenes, inelastic neutron scattering spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy
Introduction
Fullerene science may be said to have been born in 1990, when the route to macroscopic quantities of the materials was invented.1 This prompted an intense and continuing effort, both experimental and theoretical, to understand and exploit the properties of these novel forms of carbon. Areas of interest span physics,2 chemistry,3 biology,4 and astronomy.5,6 Most of the activity has focussed on C60 because of the iconic nature of the icosohedral symmetry and for the practical reason that it is the most readily available of the fullerenes.
The second most abundant fullerene is C70 (Figure 1). This may be considered as the shortest possible nanotube capped by a hemisphere of C60 at each end. The additional ten carbon atoms have a profound effect on the molecule. The idealised (gas-phase) symmetry is reduced to D5h from Ih. This means that there are now eight distinct types of C−C bond rather than the two found in C60. The number of internal vibrational modes increases to 204 from 174. These are classified as:
| 1 |
Figure 1.

View of C70 showing the definitions of the bonds.
Thus, there are many more modes in C70 than C60:122 vs. 46. The reduction in symmetry does have one advantage—in C70, 84 modes (31 infrared and 53 Raman) are potentially observable by infrared and Raman spectroscopies, whereas only 14 (4 infrared and 10 Raman) are allowed in C60.
In the solid state, the consequences of the additional carbon atoms are equally striking. From the sublimation temperature to 260 K, C60 undergoes rapid rotation and the structure can be described as a face-centred cubic (fcc) lattice of spheres, space group Fm
m with Z=1 in the primitive cell.7 Below 260 K, an orientationally ordered simple cubic phase is obtained, space group Pa
with Z=4 in the primitive cell.8 In contrast, at room temperature, the phase obtained with C70 may be fcc or hexagonal close packed (hcp); these may partially order as the rotation about the short axis and then the long axis is quenched on cooling. The low temperature phase has been proposed to be orthorhombic, Pbnm,9 with Z=4 and also as monoclinic.10 Whether the room temperature phase is fcc or hcp, whether there are one or two rotator phases, and whether the low temperature phase is orthorhombic or monoclinic depend sensitively on sample history, cooling rate, and purity, particularly the amount of C60 present. The complex crystallography of C70 is well summarised elsewhere.11
The assignment of the internal modes of C70 is largely based on solid-state spectra; the only gas-phase data12 identified eight infrared active fundamentals. The infrared and Raman spectra have been measured several times;13–20 as with C60 it was realised that all the modes are allowed in inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectroscopy,21 and a low-quality spectrum has been reported.22 Most19,23–25 computational studies assume D5h symmetry, that is, they use the isolated molecule approximation. One study26 employed Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics so as to include solid-state effects. A critical test of the reliability of a calculation is how well it reproduces the INS spectrum. We have previously adopted this approach to completely assign the vibrational spectrum of C60 and have shown that all previous assignments were incorrect in some respect.27 Two papers using different computational methods have done so for C70; both report good agreement.23,25 However, the quality of the spectrum, particularly in the 800–1600 cm−1 region is insufficient to make this a useful comparison. In this work, we report a new INS spectrum obtained from a large sample (9 g, about 18 times larger than that previously used) recorded at the highest resolution available, combined with a periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculation that includes solid-state effects. Together, these allow a stringent test of the published assignments and a new assignment of all of the internal modes of C70.
Results and Discussion
As described in the Introduction, there is no agreement as to the exact form of the low-temperature structure of C70, with both orthorhombic and monoclinic structures proposed.9–11 Since fivefold symmetry is incompatible with long-range order,28 it follows that the site symmetry must be simultaneously a subgroup of D5h and also a permitted site symmetry of Pbnm or a monoclinic space group. Only Cs, C2, and C1 meet these constraints. Spectroscopically, all three are equivalent: all degeneracies are lifted and all modes are allowed in both the infrared and Raman spectra. (The three possibilities are only distinguishable by single crystal studies with polarised radiation.) However, the intensities will vary considerably, and modes that are forbidden under D5h symmetry are likely to be weak in the solid-state spectra and may be confused with combination modes, as found with C6029,30 All the modes are allowed in INS spectroscopy and all will have similar intensities, since all the atoms in the mode have the same scattering cross section and will have similar amplitudes of vibration. Figure 2 shows the INS spectra recorded with the TOSCA and MAPS instruments (ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, UK). Figure 3 a shows the Raman spectrum at 20 K recorded simultaneously with the TOSCA spectrum, while Figure 3 b shows the infrared spectrum at 113 K recorded by attenuated total reflectance (ATR). In comparison to previous work,22 the INS spectra exhibit a signal-to-noise ratio more than an order of magnitude better and with significantly improved resolution, particularly in the 800–1600 cm−1 region. While the infrared and Raman spectra show many modes across the range 200–3000 cm−1, there is a sharp cut-off at 1600 cm−1 in the INS spectra, demonstrating that all modes to higher energy must be overtones or combinations.
Figure 2.

Vibrational spectra of C70 at 7 K. a) INS spectrum recorded on TOSCA, b) INS spectrum recorded on MAPS with an incident energy of 1452 cm−1, and c) INS spectrum recorded on MAPS with an incident energy of 2017 cm−1.
Figure 3.

a) Raman spectrum at 7 K after correction for the instrument response and sloping baseline. This was recorded simultaneously with the TOSCA spectrum (Figure 1 a). b) Infrared spectrum recorded at 113 K using ATR after baseline correction.
The need for a new assignment is demonstrated in Figure 4, which compares our new INS spectrum (Figure 4 a) with the INS spectra predicted by literature results assuming an isolated (gas phase) molecule19 (Figure 4 b) and by an ab initio molecular dynamics simulation26 (Figure 4 c). It can be seen that while the overall profile is approximately correct, both simulated spectra are wrong in detail, particularly in the 450–800 cm−1 region. For the present work, we have chosen to model the system with ab initio lattice dynamics (as implemented in the DFT code, CASTEP), that was successfully used for C60.27
Figure 4.

Comparison of the a) TOSCA INS spectrum of C70 at 7 K with spectra simulated using literature assignments: b) for the gas phase by GAUSSIAN 98 (D5h symmetry)19 and c) by an ab initio molecular dynamics simulation.26
The only structure that has the atomic coordinates available is the Pbnm9 structure with Z=4 and Cs site symmetry, where the horizontal mirror plane of the D5h point group is coincident with the crystallographic mirror plane of Pbnm. We chose to simplify the problem by removing three molecules from the unit cell. This reduces the space-group symmetry to Pm but retains the point-group symmetry reduction that must be present in the solid state.
Table 1 compares the available structural data9,31,32 with the results of the CASTEP calculation for the Pm structure and that of the idealised D5h gas phase molecule calculated using GAUSSIAN 03. For ease of comparison with other work, we have adopted the same definitions of the bonds as used previously (see Figure 1).9 It can be seen that both calculations are in good agreement with the experimental data and with each other; the differences rarely exceed ±0.1 Å. The only discrepancy is with the experimental gas phase value for bond 8; however, in comparison to the other distances in the molecule, this appears anomalous. We note that the longest experimental distance in C60 is 1.487 Å.8
Table 1.
Comparison of observed and calculated intramolecular bond distances (Å) in C70.
| Bond[a] | Gas phase [D5h] | Solid state | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ab initio | Expt.[b] | Ab initio Pm | Expt. Pbnm[c] | Expt.[d] | ||
| 1 | 1.461 | 1.461(8) | 1.453 | 1.434(8) | 1.459(4) | |
| 2 | 1.405 | 1.388(16) | 1.401 | 1.377(10) | 1.385(7) | |
| 3 | 1.457 | 1.453(11) | 1.447 | 1.443(9) | 1.449(6) | |
| 4 | 1.398 | 1.386(25) | 1.393 | 1.369(10) | 1.376(7) | |
| 5 | 1.455 | 1.468(11) | 1.446 | 1.442(7) | 1.460(1) | |
| 6 | 1.446 | 1.425(14) | 1.437 | 1.394(11) | 1.438(4) | |
| 7 | 1.428 | 1.405(13 | 1.419 | 1.418(7) | 1.417(6) | |
| 8 | 1.477 | 1.538(19) | 1.466 | 1.457(12) | 1.479(7) | |
A comparison of the TOSCA INS spectrum with that calculated for the gas phase and the solid state is shown in Figure 5. It can be seen from the comparisons of the observed and calculated spectra that the present results provide a better description of the vibrational modes of C70 than all previous computational studies.19,23–25 In most cases, these have imposed D5h point-group symmetry on the calculation, that is, a gas-phase calculation, hence mode assignment is straightforward. In our case, we have a Cs symmetry molecule, and relating the modes back to the parent D5h symmetry is more complex. To proceed, we note that the highest subgroup of D5h that is compatible with translational symmetry is C2v. Imposing C2v symmetry on the Pm C70 structure raises the crystal symmetry to Pmm2. This structure was then geometry optimised, and the vibrational modes were calculated. This results in an INS spectrum that has the same profile as that from the Pm structure, but slightly shifted to lower wavenumber. Thus, the modes have been calculated in the same order in both systems. Using the correlation given in Table S1 in the Supporting Information, and assuming that modes that are degenerate under D5h symmetry will be very close (a few wavenumbers at most), it can be seen that the modes can be readily assigned as A′, E′, A“, and E”.
Figure 5.

Comparison of the a) TOSCA INS spectrum of C70 at 7 K with that calculated for the b) solid state by CASTEP (site symmetry Cs) and c) for the gas phase by GAUSSIAN 03 (D5h symmetry).
In order to assign the modes as to whether they are symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to the improper rotation 2 S5, (subscript 1 or 2, respectively), we note that eight infrared modes12 are observed in the gas phase and 24 Raman modes in solution.18 In both cases, D5h symmetry is present. Hence, the infrared active modes must be either
or
, and the Raman active modes
,
, or
; thus, these limit the possibilities for some of the modes. Additionally, inspection of Figure 5 shows that the major discrepancies between the isolated molecule (D5h) spectra and the solid-state (Cs) spectra (observed and calculated) occur in the region 450–800 cm−1. Outside this region, the INS spectral patterns are remarkably similar, suggesting that the D5h assignments are reliable below 450 cm−1 and above 800 cm−1. In combination, the experimental infrared and Raman transition energies with the partial gas-phase assignment enable a complete set of assignments to be made. This, for the internal modes of C70 with Cs symmetry in the Pm structure, is given in Table S2 in the Supporting Information, together with the observed INS, infrared, and Raman bands.
Further support for the validity of our model is provided by comparison of the observed and calculated Raman and infrared spectra (Figures 6 and 7). Our Raman spectrum was recorded using 785 nm excitation, which is well removed from the lowest-energy electronic absorption bands at 467 and 545 nm,33 so the spectrum should not be affected by resonance or preresonance effects,18 and the agreement is very good. The infrared spectrum (Figure 7 a), was recorded by ATR and is markedly different from those recorded by transmission infrared spectroscopy.13,15,16,19,20 Comparison with the vibrational density of states (VDOS) (Figure 7 b) and the calculated infrared spectrum (Figure 7 c) shows much better agreement with the former. Many more modes are observed than expected, most of which are fundamentals. It is not at all clear why this occurs. The ATR device uses a clamp to ensure good contact between the sample and the diamond ATR element; however, pressure alone cannot be the explanation, as transmission infrared measurements20 up to 10 GPa do not result in a similar spectrum. We (and others)34 have observed a similar effect in C60.
Figure 6.

Comparison of a) the observed Raman spectrum of C70 at 7 K with that calculated for the solid state b) by CASTEP (site symmetry Cs).
Figure 7.

Comparison of a) the observed infrared spectrum of C70 at 113 K with b) the calculated VDOS and c) calculated infrared spectrum; (b) and (c) are calculated for the solid state by CASTEP with Cs site symmetry.
Close inspection of Figure 5 a, b shows that the calculated and observed INS spectra differ in minor regards, in that some of the calculated transition energies are slightly (a few wavenumbers) inaccurate. We have previously shown that the calculated intensities (eigenvectors) are not very sensitive to the transition energy,35 so it is possible to make small changes in the transition energies and use the same eigenvectors. The procedure is to shift a calculated band to the nearest experimental feature of the correct intensity. In essence, this amounts to individual scaling factors for each of the modes and was successfully used for C60.27 Figure 8 shows the result, and it can be seen that the agreement is excellent; based on this, Table S2 in the Supporting Information lists the internal modes of C70 in D5h symmetry. The transition energies reported are a combination of experimental and our ab initio results and represent the best available description of the vibrational modes of C70.
Figure 8.

Comparison of the TOSCA INS spectrum of C70 at 7 K (blue) with that calculated for the solid state by CASTEP (red, site symmetry Cs) after individual scaling of the modes and inclusion of the phonon wings.
There have been attempts19,26 to identify modes that are characteristic of the ‘belt’ of the additional ten atoms that distinguish C60 from C70. By generating INS ‘spectra’ where the cross section of all the atoms except those of interest are set to zero, it is possible to see whether there are any modes localised in either the belt or the caps. Figure 9 shows the result, and it is clear that for almost all the modes, both the belt and cap atoms are involved. There are a few modes where there is no motion of the belt atoms (
mode at 307 cm−1,
mode at 336 cm−1,
mode at 705 cm−1,
mode at 705 cm−1, and the
mode at 707 cm−1), and these are shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. We find no modes that only involve motion of the belt atoms. We also disagree with the conclusion19 that the amplitude of motion of the belt atoms is larger than that of the cap: the intensities in Figure 9 are per carbon atom, and both spectra are plotted on the same ordinate scale. Thus the amplitudes of the atoms are similar in both cases.
Figure 9.

Calculated INS spectra of C70 modes involving motion of: a) the ‘belt’ atoms and b) the ‘cap’ atoms. The spectra are normalised to the intensity per carbon atom.
Conclusions
A combination of a much better quality INS spectrum with periodic DFT calculations has allowed all the internal modes of C70 to be assigned. Comparison of the INS spectra predicted by previous work with the new data demonstrates that all previous assignments were incorrect in several respects. In particular, isolated molecule calculations using Gaussian basis sets result in inaccurate assignments. In contrast, the periodic-DFT approach produces assignments that are in almost quantitative agreement with the data without the need for scaling for both C60 and C70. This clearly has implications for the future assignment of higher fullerenes such as C84.
The need for a reliable assignment spans astronomy,5,6 where the fullerenes are detected by their vibrational signatures, to polymers, where fullerenes are attracting attention as fillers36 or novel monomers37 and solar cells.38,39 There is considerable current interest in solar cells that use C60 or C70 derivatives as the light-harvesting element. Knowledge of the parent fullerene's vibrational spectrum is an essential first step in understanding how the spectrum is modified on derivatisation and how the materials change in use.
Experimental Section
The INS21 experiments were performed with the high-resolution time-of-flight spectrometers, TOSCA40 and MAPS,41 at the ISIS42 pulsed spallation neutron source at the STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, UK. While both TOSCA and MAPS access the same energy transfer range, 0 to 4000 cm−1, they provide complementary data. In INS spectroscopy, overtones and combinations are allowed transitions, whose intensity depends on Q2n, where Q (Å−1) is the momentum transfer and n is the order of the transition, n=1 fundamental, n=2, first overtone or binary combination, and so forth. On the indirect geometry instrument, TOSCA, each energy-transfer value (ω, cm−1) is associated with a unique momentum-transfer value: Q2≈ω/16. Thus the intensity of the overtones and combinations increases rapidly with increasing energy transfer on TOSCA and dominate the spectrum at large energy transfer. The direct-geometry instrument, MAPS, can access low-momentum transfer at large-energy transfer, so it enables high energy modes to be observed that are difficult to detect on TOSCA. On TOSCA, the resolution is ∼1.25 % of the energy transfer across the entire energy range, while on MAPS, under the conditions used here, it is ∼1.5 % of the incident energy at the largest energy transfer and degrades with decreasing energy transfer. Thus, TOSCA provides excellent energy resolution at energy transfers<1200 cm−1; at larger energy transfer MAPS provides better resolution by virtue of the access to low Q. TOSCA and MAPS are highly complementary and enable the complete range of interest, 0–2000 cm−1, to be covered with good resolution. The spectra were recorded from a 9.1 g sample of C70 at 20 K.
Dispersive Raman spectra were recorded simultaneously with the TOSCA spectra with a modified Renishaw InVia spectrometer (Wotton-under-Edge, UK) using a diode laser at 785 nm as the excitation source and a Peltier-cooled CCD detector. The system has been described in detail elsewhere.43 The spectral resolution is determined by the laser wavelength and the dispersion of the grating and is ∼4 cm−1. The laser power at the sample is a few mW; this results in a 1 K temperature rise when the Raman spectrum is recorded. The Raman spectra have been corrected for the instrument response function. Weak sample fluorescence resulted in a sloping baseline; this has been approximated by a polynomial and subtracted from the spectrum.
Attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) infrared spectra (400–4000 cm−1) were recorded with a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer (Billerica, USA) (4 cm−1 resolution, 128 scans), with the sample held in a Specac Low-Temperature Golden Gate ATR (Orpington, UK) with a KBr beamsplitter and a deuterated triglycerine sulfate (DTGS) detector. The spectra were recorded over the temperature range 113–300 K. They exhibited a strongly sloping baseline; this was approximated by a polynomial and subtracted from the spectrum.
C70 (99+ %, MER Corporation, Tucson, USA) was dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 383 K before use. The weight loss was less than 0.1 %.
Ab initio DFT calculations of the isolated molecule in D5h symmetry were carried out with GAUSSIAN 03.44 The rpbe1pbe functional with the 6–311g(d) basis set was used. Periodic-DFT studies of the crystalline structures were carried out using the plane-wave pseudopotential method implemented in the CASTEP code.45,46 Exchange and correlation were approximated using the PBE functional.47 A norm-conserving pseudopotential for carbon was generated using the kinetic-energy optimised method,48 with core radii of 1.2 a0 (s) and 1.54 a0 (p) in conjunction with a plane-wave cut-off energy of 750 eV. All the calculations were carried out at the Γ-point to reduce the computational cost. The equilibrium structure, an essential prerequisite for lattice dynamics calculations, was obtained by BFGS geometry optimization, after which the residual forces were converged to zero within 0.009 eV Å−1. Phonon frequencies were obtained by diagonalisation of dynamical matrices, computed using density-functional perturbation theory46 (DFPT). An analysis of the resulting eigenvectors was used to map the computed modes to the corresponding irreducible representations of the point group and assign IUPAC symmetry labels. DFPT was also used to compute the dielectric response and the Born effective charges, and from these, the mode oscillator strength tensor and infrared absorptivity were calculated. The Raman activity tensors were calculated using a hybrid finite displacement/DFPT method.49 The calculated infrared and Raman spectra were generated using the CASTEP utility ‘dos.pl’.50 The program ACLIMAX51 was used to produce the INS spectrum from the ab initio results. The INS spectra in Figure 4 b,c were generated by using the published assignments,19,26 but with the eigenvectors calculated in this work. As noted earlier, the eigenvectors are not very sensitive to the calculated eigenvalue,35 and the INS intensity per mode is almost constant (since the intensity does not vary greatly across the spectrum, and all modes are present). Only the Debye–Waller factor changes (since it depends on Q, and this is directly related to the energy transfer21,40), and this is included in the generation of the INS spectrum by ACLIMAX.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory for access to neutron beam facilities. Computing resources (time on the SCARF computer cluster for the CASTEP calculations) was provided by STFC's e-Science facility.
Supporting Information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supplementary
References
- Krätschmer W, Lamb LD, Fostiropoulos K, Huffmann DR. Nature. 1990;347:354. [Google Scholar]
- Buntar V, Weber HW. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 1996;9:599–615. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor R. Lecture Notes on Fullerene Chemistry: A Handbook for Chemists. Singapore: World Scientific; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Jensen AW, Wilson SR, Schuster DI. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996;4:767. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(96)00081-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cami J, Bernard-Salas J, Peeters E, Malek SE. Science. 2010;329:1180. doi: 10.1126/science.1192035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cami J, Bernard-Salas J, Peeters E, Malek SE. Proc. Int. Astron. Union. 2011;7:216–227. [Google Scholar]
- Moret R. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 2005;61:62. doi: 10.1107/S0108767304025802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- David WIF, Ibberson RI, Matthewman JC, Prassides K, Dennis TJS, Hare JP, Kroto HW, Taylor R, Walton DRM. Nature. 1991;353:147. [Google Scholar]
- van Smaalen S, Petricek V, de Boer JL, Dusek M, Verheijen MA, Meijer G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994;223:323. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh G, Sastry VS, Sundar CS, Radhak-rishnan TS. Solid State Commun. 1998;105:247. [Google Scholar]
- Isakina AP, Prokhvatilov AI, Strzhemechny MA, Yagotintsev KA. Low Temp. Phys. 2001;27:1037. [Google Scholar]
- Nemes L, Ram RS, Bernath PF, Tinker FA, Zumwalt MC, Lamb LD, Huffman DR. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994;218:295. [Google Scholar]
- Meilunas R, Chang RPH, Liu S, Jensen M, Kappes MM. J. Appl. Phys. 1991;70:5128. [Google Scholar]
- van Loosdrecht PHM, Verheijen MA, Meekes H, van Bentum PJM, Meijer G. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;47:7610. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.47.7610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jishi RA, Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Wang K-A, Zhou P, Rao AM, Eklund PC. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993;206:187. [Google Scholar]
- Bowmar P, Hayes W, Kurmoo M, Pattenden PA, Green MA, Day P, Kikuchi PK. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 1994;6:3161. [Google Scholar]
- Lynch K, Tanke C, Menzel F, Brockner W, Scharff P, Stumpp E. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99:7985. [Google Scholar]
- Gallagher SH, Armstrong RS, Bolskar RD, Lay PA, Reed CA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:4263. [Google Scholar]
- Schettino V, Pagliai M, Cardini G. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:1815. [Google Scholar]
- Thirunavukkuarasu K, Long VC, Musfeldt JL, Borondics F, Klupp G, Kamarás K, Kuntscher CA. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:3646. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell PCH, Parker SF, Ramirez-Cuesta AJ, Tomkinson J. Vibrational Spectroscopy with Neutrons, with Applications in Chemistry, Biology, Materials Science and Catalysis. Singapore: World Scientific; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Christides C, Nikolaev AV, Dennis TJS, Prassides K, Negri F, Orlandi G, Zerbetto F. J. Phys. Chem. 1993;97:3641. [Google Scholar]
- Wang XQ, Wang CZ, Ho KM. Phys. Rev. B. 1995;51:8656. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.51.8656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stratmann R, Scuseria G, Frisch M. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1998;29:483. [Google Scholar]
- Sun G, Kertesz M. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:6381. [Google Scholar]
- Onida G, Andreoni W, Kohanoff J, Parrinello M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994;219:1. [Google Scholar]
- Parker SF, Bennington SM, Taylor JW, Herman H, Silverwood I, Albers P, Refson K. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011;13:7789. doi: 10.1039/c0cp02956d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ladd MFC, Palmer RA. Structure Determination By X-Ray Crystallography. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Dong Z-H, Zhou P, Holden JM, Eklund PC, Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;48:2862. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.48.2862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K-A, Rao AM, Eklund PC, Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;48:11375. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.48.11375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hedberg K, Hedberg L, Bühl M, Bethune DS, Brown CA, Johnson RD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:5314. [Google Scholar]
- Nikolaev AV, Dennis TJS, Prassides K, Soper AK. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994;223:143. [Google Scholar]
- Cataldo F, Iglesias-Groth S, Hafez Y. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2013;2:1013–1018. [Google Scholar]
- Rassat A, Fabre C, Messaoudi A, Setton R, Ceolin R, Bernier P, Zahab A. Compt. Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, Série 2. 1992;315:1653. [Google Scholar]
- Tomkinson J, Parker SF. Spectrochim. Acta. 2011;79A:2017. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2011.04.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waller JH, Bucknall DG, Register RA, Beckham HW, Leisen J, Campbell K. Polymer. 2009;50:4199–4204. [Google Scholar]
- Wang C, Guo Z-X, Fu S, Wu W, Zhu D. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004;29:1079–1141. [Google Scholar]
- Lin Y, Li Y, Zhan X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:4245–4272. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15313k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brabec CJ, Gowrisanker S, Halls JJM, Laird D, Jia S, Williams SP. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:3839–3856. doi: 10.1002/adma.200903697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker SF, Fernandez-Alonso F, Ramirez-Cuesta AJ, Tomkinson J, Rudic S, Pinna RS, Gorini G, Fernández Castañon J. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014;554:012003. [Google Scholar]
- Parker SF, Lennon D, Albers PW. Appl. Spectrosc. 2011;65:1325. [Google Scholar]
- www.isis.stfc.ac.uk.
- Adams MA, Parker SF, Fernandez-Alonso F, Cutler DJ, Hodges C, King A. Appl. Spectrosc. 2009;63:727. doi: 10.1366/000370209788701107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaussian 03. Revision B. Frisch MJ. Trucks GW. Schlegel HB. Scuseria GE. Robb MA. Cheeseman JR. Montgomery JA., Jr. Vreven T. Kudin KN. Burant JC. Millam JM. Iyengar SS. Tomasi J. Barone V. Mennucci B. Cossi M. Scalmani G. Rega N. Petersson GA. Nakatsuji H. Hada M. Ehara M. Toyota K. Fukuda R. Hasegawa J. Ishida M. Nakajima T. Honda Y. Kitao O. Nakai H. Klene M. Li X. Knox JE. Hratchian HP. Cross JB. Bakken V. Adamo C. Jaramillo J. Gomperts R. Stratmann RE. Yazyev O. Austin A. J. Cammi R. Pomelli C. Ochterski JW. Ayala PY. Morokuma K. Voth GA. Salvador P. Dannenberg JJ. Zakrzewski VG. Dapprich S. Daniels AD. Strain MC. Farkas O. Malick DK. Rabuck AD. Raghavachari K. Foresman JB. Ortiz JV. Cui Q. Baboul AG. Clifford S. Cioslowski J. Stefanov BB. Liu G. Liashenko A. Piskorz P. Komaromi I. Martin RL. Fox DJ. Keith T. Al-Laham MA. Peng CY. Nanayakkara A. Challacombe M. Gill P. M. W. Johnson B. Chen W. Wong MW. Gonzalez C. Pople JA. Inc., Wallingford CT: Gaussian; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Clark SJ, Segall MD, Pickard CJ, Hasnip PJ, Probert MJ, Refson K, Payne MC. Z. Kristallogr. 2005;220:567. [Google Scholar]
- Refson K, Tulip PR, Clark SJ. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;73:155114. [Google Scholar]
- Perdew J, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rappe AM, Rabe KM, Kaxiras E, Joannopoulos JD. Phys. Rev. B. 1990;41:1227. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.41.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milman V, Perlov A, Refson K, Clark SJ, Gavartin J, Winkler B. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2009;21:485404. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/48/485404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Refson K. Phonons and Related Calculations in CASTEP. 2013 STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Copyright STFC 2009: http://www.tcm. phy.cam.ac.uk/castep/Phonons_Guide/Castep_Phonons.html. [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez-Cuesta AJ. Comp. Phys. Comm. 2004;157:226. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary
