The Candida albicans Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1 Regulates Stress Resistance and Virulence via Distinct Chromatin Assembly Pathways

Michael Tscherner; Florian Zwolanek; Sabrina Jenull; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Andriy Petryshyn; Ingrid E Frohner; John Mavrianos; Neeraj Chauhan; Arndt von Haeseler; Karl Kuchler

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005218

. 2015 Oct 16;11(10):e1005218. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005218

The Candida albicans Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1 Regulates Stress Resistance and Virulence via Distinct Chromatin Assembly Pathways

Michael Tscherner ¹, Florian Zwolanek ¹, Sabrina Jenull ¹, Fritz J Sedlazeck ^2,^¤a, Andriy Petryshyn ¹, Ingrid E Frohner ¹, John Mavrianos ³, Neeraj Chauhan ³, Arndt von Haeseler ², Karl Kuchler ^1,^*

Editor: Damian J Krysan⁴

PMCID: PMC4608838 PMID: 26473952

Abstract

Human fungal pathogens like Candida albicans respond to host immune surveillance by rapidly adapting their transcriptional programs. Chromatin assembly factors are involved in the regulation of stress genes by modulating the histone density at these loci. Here, we report a novel role for the chromatin assembly-associated histone acetyltransferase complex NuB4 in regulating oxidative stress resistance, antifungal drug tolerance and virulence in C. albicans. Strikingly, depletion of the NuB4 catalytic subunit, the histone acetyltransferase Hat1, markedly increases resistance to oxidative stress and tolerance to azole antifungals. Hydrogen peroxide resistance in cells lacking Hat1 results from higher induction rates of oxidative stress gene expression, accompanied by reduced histone density as well as subsequent increased RNA polymerase recruitment. Furthermore, hat1Δ/Δ cells, despite showing growth defects in vitro, display reduced susceptibility to reactive oxygen-mediated killing by innate immune cells. Thus, clearance from infected mice is delayed although cells lacking Hat1 are severely compromised in killing the host. Interestingly, increased oxidative stress resistance and azole tolerance are phenocopied by the loss of histone chaperone complexes CAF-1 and HIR, respectively, suggesting a central role for NuB4 in the delivery of histones destined for chromatin assembly via distinct pathways. Remarkably, the oxidative stress phenotype of hat1Δ/Δ cells is a species-specific trait only found in C. albicans and members of the CTG clade. The reduced azole susceptibility appears to be conserved in a wider range of fungi. Thus, our work demonstrates how highly conserved chromatin assembly pathways can acquire new functions in pathogenic fungi during coevolution with the host.

Author Summary

Candida albicans is the most prevalent fungal pathogen infecting humans, causing life-threatening infections in immunocompromised individuals. Host immune surveillance imposes stress conditions upon C. albicans, to which it has to adapt quickly to escape host killing. This can involve regulation of specific genes requiring disassembly and reassembly of histone proteins, around which DNA is wrapped to form the basic repeat unit of eukaryotic chromatin—the nucleosome. Here, we discover a novel function for the chromatin assembly-associated histone acetyltransferase complex NuB4 in oxidative stress response, antifungal drug tolerance as well as in fungal virulence. The NuB4 complex modulates the induction kinetics of hydrogen peroxide-induced genes. Furthermore, NuB4 negatively regulates susceptibility to killing by immune cells and thereby slowing the clearing from infected mice in vivo. Remarkably, the oxidative stress resistance seems restricted to C. albicans and closely related species, which might have acquired this function during coevolution with the host.

Introduction

Eukaryotic chromatin is densely packed with the nucleosome being its basic repeating unit [1]. This structure represents a barrier for enzymes reading or modifying genomic DNA. Thus, disassembly and reassembly of histones, the core components of nucleosomes, is essential for various biological processes, including transcription, replication and DNA repair [2–7]. Two key players in the deposition of newly synthesized histones into chromatin are type B histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone chaperones. Type B HATs specifically acetylate free histones immediately after synthesis and show at least partial cytoplasmic localization. Hat1 was the first type B HAT identified and was found conserved throughout the eukaryotic kingdom [8,9]. Together with the Hat2 subunit (RbAp46/48 in higher eukaryotes), Hat1 acetylates histone H4 at lysine 5 and 12 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans [9,10]. After binding of an additional subunit in the nucleus, the so-called NuB4 complex is formed, which is responsible for histone deposition at sites of DNA damage [11,12]. Rtt109 is another fungal-specific Type B HAT involved in DNA damage repair and associated histone deposition by acetylating free histone H3 at lysine 56 [2,13]. Interestingly, telomeric silencing is also defective in S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe hat1Δ mutants [14,15]. Thus, Hat1 appears to be also involved in the generation or maintenance of repressive chromatin structures.

Hat1 operates with various histone chaperones [16–18]. This class of proteins is able to bind histones thereby avoiding unspecific interactions with DNA and facilitating correct incorporation into nucleosomes [19]. Two main chromatin assembly pathways include the hallmark histone chaperone complexes CAF-1 and HIR. While CAF-1 is well known to function in replication-coupled chromatin assembly, recent reports indicate also a role in transcription regulation [20–22]. In contrast, HIR is involved in replication-independent chromatin assembly and acts as a repressor of histone genes outside of S-phase [23]. Of note, Hat1 was found in complexes together with CAF-1 or HIR, thus suggesting a central role in the delivery of newly synthesized histones for incorporation via distinct pathways [16,18].

The opportunistic human fungal pathogen Candida albicans is the most frequent cause of Candida-derived invasive infections [24]. Candida spp. can cause diseases ranging from chronic mucocutaneous to life-threatening systemic infections in immunocompromised patients. C. albicans belongs to the CTG clade, a group of closely related species which translate the CUG codon as serine instead of leucine [25]. During the infection process, C. albicans encounters various environmental stress conditions, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by innate immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells or neutrophils dedicated to kill invading pathogens [26]. Furthermore, treatment with antifungal agents such as azoles, which inhibit fungal ergosterol biosynthesis and are commonly used to treat Candida infections, also represents severe stress to the pathogen [27]. At least two major mechanisms are therefore essential for C. albicans to be able to survive under these conditions: the fungus has to be able to repair damaged cellular components efficiently, and it has to respond rapidly by adapting transcriptional programs to counteract immune defense [28–32]. Changes in chromatin structure are involved in both mechanisms. Disassembly and reassembly of histones is required for efficient repair of DNA damage [2,7]. Furthermore, transcriptional modulation is intimately linked to the histone density at the corresponding loci [6,33–35]. Interestingly, several studies reported functions of chromatin-remodeling factors in the regulation of stress-responsive genes [33,36–38]. For instance, incorporation of histones into chromatin is particularly important for efficient gene repression, as the increase of histone density impairs binding of activators and inhibits RNA polymerase progression [6,39,40].

We have recently shown that C. albicans NuB4 complex is required for efficient repair of DNA damage resulting from endogenous or exogenous impact [10]. Here, we report a novel function for NuB4 in the negative regulation of oxidative stress resistance and azole tolerance. The Hat1 component of NuB4 acts in concert with distinct chromatin assembly pathways, which is independent of its conserved role in DNA damage repair. We show that the loss of the NuB4 complex markedly increases oxidative stress resistance through an accelerated induction of oxidative stress genes. Furthermore, this renders the pathogen resistant to killing by innate immune cells and promotes persistence of a hat1Δ/Δ mutant in a murine infection model. Interestingly, loss of Cac2, a subunit of the CAF-1 histone chaperone complex, mimics the oxidative stress resistance phenotype of hat1Δ/Δ cells. Furthermore, transcriptional profiling by RNA-Seq confirms overlapping functions of NuB4 and CAF-1 in C. albicans. Moreover, we also discover a novel role for NuB4 requiring the HIR complex for the negative regulation of azole tolerance in C. albicans. Interestingly, whereas the oxidative stress phenotype of hat1Δ/Δ cells has exclusively evolved in the Candida CTG clade, the reduced azole susceptibility seems to be conserved in a wider range of fungal species. Thus, our work demonstrates how highly conserved chromatin assembly pathways can acquire new functions, as for example in pathogenic fungi during coevolution with the host. Thus, host-specific immune defense mechanisms can act as drivers of evolutionary adaptation, enabling pathogens to cope with specific stress conditions.

Results

Deletion of NuB4 components increases H₂O₂ resistance and azole tolerance

In a previous study, we identified the C. albicans NuB4 complex being essential for efficient repair of both exogenous and endogenous DNA damage [10]. C. albicans DNA damage repair mutants show increased susceptibility to ROS produced by immune cells [30]. Therefore, we asked if inactivation of the NuB4 complex would render this pathogen hypersusceptible to H₂O₂. Surprisingly, however, deletion of HAT1, HAT2 or both genes increased the resistance to H₂O₂ as determined by spot dilution assays (Fig 1A). Importantly, reintegration of HAT1 or HAT2 at its endogenous locus fully restored the wild-type phenotype (Fig 1A).

Due to this unexpected resistance phenotype, we subjected the hat1Δ/Δ mutant to phenotypic analysis by applying a set of different stress conditions including cell wall stress (Calcofluor White, Congo Red), osmotic stress (NaCl), oxidative stress (tert-Butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH), diamide), heavy metal stress (CdCl₂), as well as antifungal drugs (Voriconazole, Itraconazole, Amphotericin B). For most conditions, we did not observe any difference between the wild-type and the hat1Δ/Δ strain (S1A Fig). However, lack of Hat1 markedly increased resistance to the oxidizing agents tBOOH and diamide, indicating a specific role for Hat1 in the regulation of oxidative stress resistance (Fig 1B and S1B Fig).

Interestingly, we also observed that deletion of HAT1 increased tolerance to different azole drugs (Fig 1C). Azoles represent a widely used class of antifungals targeting the lanosterol 14-α-demethylase, thereby blocking fungal ergosterol biosynthesis. Furthermore, deletion of HAT2 or HAT1 and HAT2 mimicked deletion of HAT1 and reintegration of both genes at their endogenous loci fully restored the wild-type phenotype (Fig 1C). To confirm that the observed resistance phenotypes are independent of the NuB4 function in DNA damage repair, we determined sensitivities of different DNA damage repair mutants to H₂O₂ and voriconazole. Importantly, neither deletion of the gene encoding the histone H3 specific acetyltransferase Rtt109 nor the absence of the repair protein Rad52 yielded in comparable oxidative stress or voriconazole phenotypes (Fig 1B, 1D and S1C Fig). Hence, not all defects in DNA repair lead to oxidative stress resistance. These data suggest that Hat1 has an additional and novel function in C. albicans in the regulation of oxidative stress resistance and antifungal drug tolerance.

Inactivation of chromatin assembly pathways mimics lack of Hat1

Hat1 is involved in the deposition of histone H3–H4 dimers at sites of DNA damage and in heterochromatic regions in different species [14,41–43]. Different histone chaperones are responsible for the incorporation of histones into nucleosomes via distinct chromatin assembly pathways [20,44–47]. We hypothesized that a defect in chromatin assembly is causing the observed resistance phenotypes. Therefore, we created deletion mutants of a set of genes encoding histone chaperones or histone chaperone complex components known to interact or copurify with Hat1 or to regulate gene expression in other species (Table 1). Genes were deleted in wild-type cells as well as in a hat1Δ/Δ background and sensitivities to H₂O₂ and voriconazole were tested.

Table 1. Selected histone chaperone genes for deletion in C. albicans.

Gene Name	ORF number	Complex	Deleted	Reference
CAC2	orf19.6670	CAF-1	+	[16,48]
HIR1	orf19.2099	HIR/HIRA	+	[18]
RTT106	orf19.1177		+	[38,49]
ASF1	orf19.3715		-	[16,17]
SPT16	orf19.2884	FACT	-	[50]
SPT6	orf19.7136		+	[33,35]

Open in a new tab

Histone chaperone genes chosen for deletion are listed. + indicates successful deletion;—indicates that no deletion mutant was obtained.

Strikingly, lack of CAC2, a subunit of the CAF-1 histone chaperone complex, also strongly increased resistance to H₂O₂ and tBOOH (Fig 2A and S1D Fig). Furthermore, a quantification of H₂O₂ resistance by determination of the survival rate in liquid culture confirmed this result (Fig 2B). Interestingly however, spot dilution assays suggested a minor effect on azole susceptibility of cac2Δ/Δ cells (Fig 2C). By contrast, deletion of HIR1, a component of the HIR histone chaperone complex, dramatically increased tolerance to voriconazole, but did not alter H₂O₂ susceptibility (Fig 2A and 2C). Importantly, HAT1 and HIR1 are epistatic, since a double deletion strain failed to show increased azole resistance when compared to the corresponding single deletions based on spot dilution assays and growth inhibition in liquid culture (Fig 2C and 2D).

Deletion of RTT106 did not alter susceptibility to H₂O₂ and voriconazole (Fig 2A and 2C). Unfortunately, we and others were unable to construct homozygous deletion mutants for ASF1 and SPT16, indicating that they might be essential [51,52]. We also included the C. albicans mutant lacking the histone chaperone Spt6 [53]. Similar to HAT1, deletion of SPT6 increased H₂O₂ resistance (Fig 2E and 2F). However, a reliable and accurate determination of azole sensitivities of the homozygous spt6Δ/Δ mutant was not possible due to its pronounced slow-growth phenotype. Of note, deletion of one SPT6 allele also decreased susceptibility to voriconazole (Fig 2F).

In a previous study, we showed that reducing histone H4 gene dosage mimics the genetic deletion of HAT1 with respect to sensitivity to genotoxic stress [10]. Furthermore, a common set of genes is differentially regulated upon depletion of histone H4 and deletion of CAC2 in S. cerevisiae [37]. Thus, we determined the effect of histone H4 reduction on oxidative stress and azole susceptibility. Interestingly, strains harboring a single copy of the histone H4 gene remaining also displayed increased H₂O₂ resistance and slightly elevated tolerance to voriconazole (Fig 2G). In summary, these data indicate that defects in distinct C. albicans chromatin assembly pathways can alter susceptibilities to H₂O₂ and voriconazole, thus regulating oxidative stress response and tolerance to azole antifungals, respectively.

Oxidative stress resistance upon loss of Hat1 is restricted to CTG clade species

Next, we wanted to determine if the role of Hat1 in the regulation of oxidative stress resistance and azole tolerance is conserved in other fungal species. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of HAT1 deletion on H₂O₂ and voriconazole susceptibility in the distantly related fungi Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. However, loss of Hat1 did not lead to increased resistance to H₂O₂ in any of these species (Fig 3A). Furthermore, lack of Hat1 failed to lower voriconazole sensitivity in S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata (Fig 3B), but increased azole tolerance in S. pombe (Fig 3Bc).

Fig 3 — (A) Deletion of *HAT1* in S. *cerevisiae* (a), C. *glabrata* (b) and S. *pombe* (c) has no effect on H₂O₂ resistance. Exponentially growing cells were treated with 5 mM (a), 50 mM (b) or 20 mM (c) H₂O₂ for 2 hours. Cells were plated and colonies counted after 3 days of incubation on YPD plates at 30°C to determine viability. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (B) Lack of Hat1 in S. *cerevisiae* (a) and C. *glabrata* (b) does not increase azole tolerance. Deletion of Hat1 in S. *pombe* reduces susceptibility to voriconazole (c). Logarithmically growing cells were diluted into medium containing 150 ng/ml (a), 1000 ng/ml (b) or 800 ng/ml (c) voriconazole and incubated at 30°C for 24 hours. OD₆₀₀ was determined and growth inhibition relative to untreated samples was calculated. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (C) C. *parapsilosis* (a) and C. *tropicalis* (b) *hat1*Δ/Δ cells show increased resistance to H₂O₂. Experiment was performed as described in (A). H₂O₂ concentrations were 50 mM (a) and 20 mM (b). (D) Loss of Hat1 in C. *parapsilosis* (a) and C. *tropicalis* (b) reduces susceptibility to voriconazole. Experiment was performed as described in (B). For C. *parapsilosis* cells were incubated for 41 hours prior to OD₆₀₀ measurement. Voriconazole concentrations were 50 ng/ml (a) and 200 ng/ml (b). (A-D) *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 relative to the corresponding wild-type (Student's t-test).

Based on these results, we speculated that Hat1 might have acquired a role in the regulation of oxidative stress resistance only later in evolution. To prove this, we constructed homozygous HAT1 deletion mutants in the more closely related CTG clade members Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis and determined their H₂O₂ sensitivity. Strikingly, lack of Hat1 decreased the susceptibility to H₂O₂ (Fig 3C) and increased tolerance to voriconazole in both species (Fig 3D). Thus, the role of Hat1 in regulating oxidative stress resistance appears specific for C. albicans and related species within the CTG clade, while the function in azole tolerance is present in a wider range of fungal species.

Loss of Hat1 primarily affects transcriptional repression

To investigate the effect of HAT1 deletion during normal growth, and to elucidate the mechanism of oxidative stress resistance in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant, we determined transcriptional profiles of cells during the logarithmic growth phase and upon H₂O₂ treatment. Therefore, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis on cells before and after exposure to 1.6 mM H₂O₂ for 30 minutes. Importantly, no loss of viability was observed even after 1 hour treatment at this peroxide concentration (S2A Fig). Furthermore, transcriptional profiles were also determined for the cac2Δ/Δ strain, since this mutant also showed an oxidative stress resistance phenotype. In addition, we included rtt109Δ/Δ cells as a control, as it mimics lack of Hat1 concerning morphology and accumulation of DNA damages [10,30], yet shows wild-type susceptibility to H₂O₂ (S1C Fig).

RNA-Seq analysis of logarithmically growing cells showed that genetic removal of HAT1 primarily upregulates a large number of genes. We found 743 genes at least 2-fold induced and 209 genes 2-fold repressed in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant when compared to the wild-type. Furthermore, the amplitude of gene repression was clearly lower when compared to the upregulation of genes, implying that Hat1 exerts primarily repressing rather than activating functions (Fig 4A). Also for the cac2Δ/Δ and rtt109Δ/Δ mutants, we observed an almost exclusive upregulation of gene expression when compared to the wild-type (Fig 4B and 4C). However, lack of Cac2 or Rtt109 had a less pronounced effect concerning the number of upregulated genes when compared to the loss of Hat1. In the cac2Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ strains, 464 and 243 genes were transcriptionally upregulated, respectively. Comparison of regulated genes in the hat1Δ/Δ, the cac2Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ mutants revealed large overlaps between all datasets (Fig 4D) with 123 genes upregulated in all three mutants. Interestingly, the majority of upregulated genes in the cac2Δ/Δ mutant were also induced in the hat1Δ/Δ strain. As expected, we also detected a large overlap between the hat1Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ strain, since both mutants share functions in DNA damage repair and cell morphology [10,30].

Fig 4 — (A) Lack of Hat1 causes mainly induction of genes in logarithmically growing cells. Each dot corresponds to one protein-coding gene. The fold change in RNA expression between untreated wild-type and *hat1*Δ/Δ cells (y-axis) is plotted against the expression level of each gene in this dataset (x-axis). Differentially expressed genes in the *hat1*Δ/Δ mutant are depicted in red. logCPM: log2 counts per million reads; logFC: log2 fold change; (B+C) Loss of Cac2 or Rtt109 causes almost exclusively upregulation of genes in logarithmically growing cells. Plots were created as described in (A). (D) Venn diagram showing the overlaps of upregulated genes in the *hat1*Δ/Δ, *cac2*Δ/Δ and *rtt109*Δ/Δ mutants in the absence of H₂O₂. (E) Venn diagram showing the overlaps of upregulated genes in the *hat1*Δ/Δ, *cac2*Δ/Δ and *rtt109*Δ/Δ mutants upon treatment with H₂O₂. (F) H₂O₂ repressed genes are upregulated in the *hat1*Δ/Δ mutant upon peroxide treatment. Each dot corresponds to one protein-coding gene. The -fold change in RNA expression between H₂O₂ treated wild-type and *hat1*Δ/Δ strains (y-axis) is plotted against the fold change between the wild-type without and with treatment (x-axis). Differentially expressed genes in the *hat1*Δ/Δ mutant are depicted in red. logFC: log2 fold change; (A-F) Differentially regulated genes were defined by a fold change > = 2 and p-value <0.05.

Following H₂O₂ treatment, downregulated genes in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant increased to 459 when compared to the wild-type, although under these conditions the majority of differentially regulated genes remain up (907). The comparison of upregulated genes in the hat1Δ/Δ, the cac2Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ mutants again revealed large overlaps between the three datasets (Fig 4E). Similar to the untreated condition, most genes with higher expression levels in the cac2Δ/Δ strain were also upregulated in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant, suggesting redundant functions of Hat1 and Cac2 in the regulation of gene expression. Furthermore, we again detected a large overlap between the hat1Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ strains, and a common set of genes upregulated in all three mutants (Fig 4E). In addition, a large fraction of upregulated genes (449) in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant were repressed in the wild-type upon treatment with H₂O₂, indicating a defect in repression due to the lack of Hat1 (Fig 4F). However, we also detected a smaller set of upregulated genes (104) in the hat1Δ/Δ strain that were induced in the wild-type. Thus, lack of Hat1 primarily leads to upregulation of genes in logarithmically growing cells, as well as upon H₂O₂ treatment indicating a repressive function of Hat1 in C. albicans.

In addition to protein-coding genes, we also analyzed the expression of non-coding elements, including tRNAs and small RNAs. Without treatment, most non-coding RNAs were not differentially expressed in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant (S1 Table). Out of 193 non-coding RNAs, 64 were repressed more than two-fold in wild-type cells upon H₂O₂ treatment (S2B Fig). Interestingly, in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant, 20 of these non-coding RNAs were upregulated at least 2-fold when compared to the wild-type, again indicating impaired repression upon loss of Hat1.

Lack of Hat1 affects specific functional gene groups

To further characterize genes upregulated upon loss of Hat1, we performed a GO term enrichment analysis. Without H₂O₂ treatment, at least 2-fold upregulated genes in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant were strongly enriched for genes involved in lipid catabolic processes and oxidation-reduction processes (Fig 5A). Interestingly, the latter group includes genes encoding for proteins with functions in oxidative stress tolerance like the catalase (CAT1), superoxide dismutases (SOD3-6) and a thiol peroxidase (orf19.87) [26,54–56]. Preliminary proteomics data also identified this group of proteins as being upregulated in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant (S2C Fig). Of note, we failed to observe enrichment for DNA damage response genes most likely due to the fact that Hat1 is involved in different processes in C. albicans. This leads to a high number of differentially expressed genes in the mutant and could hamper detection of enriched GO groups. Therefore, we analyzed subsets of differentially expressed genes based on their expression in the three mutants. As expected, due to their DNA damage phenotype, genes significantly upregulated only in the hat1Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ mutants were strongly enriched for DNA damage repair genes (Fig 5B). The specific overlap of regulated genes between hat1Δ/Δ and cac2Δ/Δ was still enriched for genes involved in oxidation-reduction processes and arginine metabolism, implying that Hat1 and Cac2 might be involved in the same processes (Fig 5C). Finally, we identified genes involved in mitochondrial degradation and microautophagy which were significantly upregulated only in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant (Fig 5D).

Fig 5 — (A) GO terms enriched among 2-fold significantly upregulated genes in logarithmically growing *hat1*Δ/Δ cells are shown. (B) The plot shows GO terms found within genes significantly upregulated in the *hat1*Δ/Δ and *rtt109*Δ/Δ strains only. (C) GO terms enriched within genes significantly upregulated in the *hat1*Δ/Δ and *cac2*Δ/Δ strains only. (D) The panel shows GO terms found among genes significantly upregulated in the *hat1*Δ/Δ mutant only and not in the *rtt109*Δ/Δ and the *cac2*Δ/Δ strains. (E) GO terms enriched among significantly upregulated genes in *hat1*Δ/Δ cells after treatment with H₂O₂ are shown. (F) The plot shows GO terms found within genes significantly upregulated in the *hat1*Δ/Δ strain only and not in the *rtt109*Δ/Δ and the *cac2*Δ/Δ strains upon H₂O₂ treatment. (A-F) The corresponding p-values for the enrichment (empty bars) and the percentage of genes changed within the GO group (filled bars) are presented. The absolute number of regulated genes within a GO group is presented in brackets. Groups containing identical genes are depicted in the same color. Significantly regulated genes were defined by a p-value <0.05.

Next, we analyzed genes with differential expression levels in the mutants relative to the wild-type upon H₂O₂ treatment. The whole group of genes significantly upregulated in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant was enriched for genes involved in rRNA processing and transport reactions (Fig 5E). We failed to detect any gene sets enriched specifically in the overlaps between the hat1Δ/Δ and the rtt109Δ/Δ or the hat1Δ/Δ and cac2Δ/Δ strains. However, we observed a strong enrichment of genes involved in non-coding RNA (ncRNA)/rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis as upregulated specifically in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant (Fig 5F).

In summary, loss of Hat1 mainly leads to increased expression of genes belonging to different functional groups, which is in accordance with Hat1 being involved in different processes in C. albicans. Furthermore, distinct functional groups affected by the loss of Hat1 are also upregulated in either the rtt109Δ/Δ or the cac2Δ/Δ strain indicating that Hat1 might function in specific processes together with Rtt109 or Cac2.

Deletion of HAT1 accelerates induction of oxidative stress genes

Transcriptional profiling of hat1Δ/Δ and cac2Δ/Δ cells revealed the upregulation of various gene sets encoding for proteins involved in the response to oxidative stress. Both mutants displayed elevated transcriptional levels of CAT1 encoding catalase, which is responsible for the decay of H₂O₂ [54]. Of note, RT-qPCR analysis confirmed derepression of CAT1 in hat1Δ/Δ and cac2Δ/Δ cells in the absence of H₂O₂. However, as expected from the RNA-Seq data, CAT1 derepression was also observed for the rtt109Δ/Δ strain, which is not resistant to H₂O₂ (S2D Fig). Thus, this moderate derepression of CAT1 is most likely due to a general stress response in these deletion mutants.

Therefore, we investigated CAT1 induction upon treatment with H₂O₂. Interestingly, lack of Hat1 as well as Cac2 caused increased CAT1 expression, indicating that these two proteins negatively regulate the induction kinetics of CAT1 (S2E Fig). However, induction levels in the rtt109Δ/Δ control strain were similar to the wild-type (S2E Fig). Since lack of Hat1 affected induction levels of CAT1, we investigated the induction kinetics of this gene in detail. Thus, we determined transcript levels upon treatment with H₂O₂ over time. Interestingly, lack of Hat1 resulted in a significantly faster induction of the CAT1 gene when compared to the wild-type (Fig 6A). Since Hat1 is involved in the deposition of histones into chromatin, we determined the effect of HAT1 deletion on the histone density at the CAT1 locus by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using antibodies against histone H3. Without treatment, the hat1Δ/Δ mutant showed a reduced histone density at the CAT1 promoter (Fig 6Ba). There was no difference in the occupancy in the CAT1 coding sequence (CDS) between the mutant and the wild-type (Fig 6Bb). Interestingly, however, treatment with H₂O₂ decreased histone density at the promoter as well as in the CDS significantly faster in hat1Δ/Δ cells when compared to the wild-type (Fig 6B). This explains the increased induction rate in the mutant, since nucleosomes represent a physical barrier for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and reduced nucleosome density can facilitate transcription [6,35,57]. Thus, lower histone density in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant could promote higher RNAPII processivity leading to increased mRNA production. Alternatively, elevated mRNA levels could also be due to increased RNAPII recruitment, which could be facilitated by the reduction in nucleosome density at the promoter. To clarify whether elevated mRNA levels are the consequence of increased RNAPII recruitment, we determined RNAPII levels at the CAT1 gene using ChIP. Interestingly, we detected increased recruitment of RNAPII to the CAT1 CDS, thus explaining the elevated mRNA levels (Fig 6C).

Fig 6 — (A) Catalase induction rate is strongly increased in *hat1*Δ/Δ cells. *CAT1* expression levels were measured by RT-qPCR after induction with 1.6 mM H₂O₂ at the indicated time points. Transcript levels were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene (RG) *PAT1*. Data are shown as mean + SD from 3 independent experiments. (B) Histone density at the *CAT1* locus is reduced in cells lacking Hat1. Histone H3 occupancy was determined by ChIP at the *CAT1* promoter region (a) and the CDS (b). (C) Loss of Hat1 leads to increased RNAPII recruitment at the *CAT1* locus. RNAPII levels were determined by ChIP at the *CAT1* CDS. (D) Induction rate of glutathione-utilizing enzymes is increased in hat1Δ/Δ cells. *GPX1* (a) and *GST1* (b) expression levels were determined by RT-qPCR at the indicated time points. Experiment was performed as described in (A). (E) Lack of Hat1 leads to increased RNAPII recruitment at the *GPX1* and *GST1* loci. RNAPII levels were determined by ChIP at the *GPX1* (a) and *GST1* (b) genes. (F+G) Loss of Cac2 increases the induction rate of both *GPX1* and *GST1* following H₂O₂ treatment. Experimental conditions were used as described in (A).

Notably, the oxidative stress response set upregulated in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant also comprised several glutathione-utilizing enzymes. Thus, we determined the induction kinetics for two of these genes upon treatment with H₂O₂. Similar to CAT1, we detected a faster induction of GPX1 (orf19.86) encoding a glutathione peroxidase (GPx) as well as of GST1 (orf19.3121), encoding a glutathione S-transferase (Fig 6D). In addition, we also detected increased RNAPII levels at both genes upon treatment with H₂O₂ (Fig 6E). Notably, we observed similar hyperinduction of GPX1 and GST1 upon H₂O₂ treatment for the cac2Δ/Δ mutant as well (Fig 6F and 6G).

Furthermore, we tested whether the increase in transcription of oxidative stress genes in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant is paralleled by elevated activity of the corresponding enzymes. Therefore, we prepared whole cell extracts from cells before and after 60 min exposure to H₂O₂ and determined catalase activity as well as GPx activity spectrophotometrically. We detected elevated catalase activity in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant already under non-inducing conditions, albeit as expected at a low level (Fig 7A). However, H₂O₂ treatment of hat1Δ/Δ cells dramatically increased catalase activity when compared to the wild-type, indicating that the mutant is more efficient in degrading hydrogen peroxide (Fig 7A). Likewise, the GPx activity assay detected some increase already under non-inducing conditions (Fig 7B), but H₂O₂ treatment of the hat1Δ/Δ mutant significantly increased GPx activity (Fig 7B). These data demonstrate that the increased induction rate of oxidative stress genes in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant increases the activities of the enzymes encoded by the target genes.

Fig 7 — (A) Faster *CAT1* induction increases catalase activity in *hat1*Δ/Δ cells. Catalase activity was determined in whole cell extracts isolated from cells before and after H₂O₂ treatment. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (B) Loss of Hat1 leads to increased glutathione peroxidase activity. GPx activity was determined in whole cell extracts isolated from cells before and after H₂O₂ treatment. Data are shown as mean + SD from two independent experiments. (C) Lack of *CAT1* does not abolish Hat1-mediated H₂O₂ resistance. Cells of the indicated strains were treated with 1 mM H₂O₂ for 2 hours, plated and colonies counted after 3 days of incubation on YPD plates at 30°C to determine viability. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (D) Depletion of glutathione biosynthesis abolishes Hat1-mediated H₂O₂ resistance. Cells of the indicated strains were treated with H₂O₂ for 2 hours and plated on YPD plates containing glutathione. Colonies were counted to determine viability after growth for 3 days at 30°C. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (A-D) n.s.: not significant, *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 relative to the corresponding control (Student's t-test).

Furthermore, to determine whether catalase hyperinduction is the main reason for the increased resistance of the hat1Δ/Δ mutant, we deleted the CAT1 gene in wild-type and hat1Δ/Δ cells and quantified their H₂O₂ susceptibilities. As expected, cat1Δ/Δ cells were highly sensitive to H₂O₂ showing only 6% survival after treatment with a low H₂O₂ concentration of 1 mM (Fig 7C). However, the double deletion strain maintained increased H₂O₂ resistance when compared to the cat1Δ/Δ single mutant indicating that increased catalase expression is not the main reason for the hydrogen peroxide resistance of the hat1Δ/Δ strain (Fig 7C). To determine if increased induction of glutathione-utilizing enzymes is causing the increased H₂O₂ resistance, we genetically depleted cells for glutathione by removing the GSH2 and GCS1 glutathione biosynthesis genes in wild-type and hat1Δ/Δ backgrounds. The first step in the synthesis of glutathione is catalyzed by the gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (Gcs1), followed by the second step carried out by the glutathione synthase (Gsh2). Deletion of one of these genes disrupts glutathione biosynthesis in C. albicans leading to glutathione auxotrophy and to increase oxidative stress sensitivity [58,59]. To determine the sensitivity to H₂O₂ of wild-type and hat1Δ/Δ cells upon deletion of GSH2 or GCS1, the strains were grown in the absence of glutathione and treated with H₂O₂ for 2h. As expected, lack of Gsh2 as well as Gcs1 strongly increased the sensitivity to H₂O₂ (Fig 7D). Strikingly, however, the absence of Hat1 did not significantly change H₂O₂ resistance in the absence of Gsh2 or Gcs1 (Fig 7D). Thus, the data strongly suggest that H₂O₂ resistance caused by deletion of Hat1 is mainly mediated via the glutathione system.

Hat1 regulates ROS detoxification and neutrophil survival

The absence of Hat1 and Cac2 leads to upregulation of oxidative stress genes and resistance to hydrogen peroxide. ROS are produced by immune cells to kill C. albicans during the infection process. The fungus counteracts this attack by upregulating ROS detoxifying enzymes of which the superoxide dismutases Sod5 and to some extend Sod4 were shown be essential for survival of C. albicans upon phagocytosis [26]. Interestingly, our RNA-Seq data not only revealed an upregulation of the catalase and glutathione-utilizing enzymes, but also markedly increased expression of genes encoding the superoxide dismutases Sod4 and Sod5 in cells lacking Hat1. The significant induction of SOD4 and SOD5 in the hat1Δ/Δ strain was also confirmed by RT-qPCR analysis (Fig 8A).

Fig 8 — (A) Superoxide dismutases Sod4 and Sod5 are induced in *hat1*Δ/Δ cells. Expression levels of *SOD4* and *SOD5* in logarithmically growing cells were detected by RT-qPCR. Transcript levels were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene (RG) *RIP1*. Data are shown as mean + SD from 3 independent experiments. (B) Infection of macrophages with *hat1*Δ/Δ cells causes reduced ROS accumulation. ROS levels were determined by measuring luminol-dependent chemiluminescence [relative luciferase units (RLU) min^-1 per 1000 immune cells] in 2.5 min intervals during interaction of the indicated C. *albicans* strains with bone marrow-derived murine macrophages (BMDMs). One representative experiment is shown. Data were reproduced in three independent experiments. (C) Quantification of total ROS release upon interaction with BMDMs. Experiment was performed as described in (B). The area under the curve within 90 min of interaction was calculated. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (D) Cells lacking Hat1 show increased survival to neutrophil killing. Survival of C. *albicans* cells upon one hour interaction with murine bone marrow neutrophils was determined by plating and CFU counting. Data are shown as mean + SD from three independent experiments. (A-D) *P<0.05, **P<0.01 relative to the wild-type (Student's t-test).

Therefore, we asked if the deletion of HAT1 influences the ability to detoxify and survive ROS released by immune cells. ROS production during interaction of C. albicans with bone marrow-derived murine macrophages and bone marrow neutrophils was determined by measuring luminol dependent chemiluminescence [26]. Interestingly, deletion of HAT1 strongly reduced total ROS levels during interaction with macrophages (Fig 8B and 8C), as well as neutrophils (S3A Fig), when compared to the wild-type. Phagocytosis is required for ROS production by the NADPH oxidase [26]. To exclude that differences in phagocytosis of the pseudohyphal hat1Δ/Δ cells contribute to reduced ROS levels, we performed a phagocytosis assay. However, phagocytosis was similar for the hat1Δ/Δ strain or wild-type (S3B Fig). Furthermore, we also determined the NADPH oxidase activation in macrophages interacting with wild-type and hat1Δ/Δ cells by immunoblotting. However, we observed no difference in the phosphorylation levels of the NADPH oxidase subunit p40phox upon interaction with hat1Δ/Δ cells or wild-type cells (S3C Fig). Therefore, reduced ROS accumulation upon interaction with hat1Δ/Δ cells most likely results from increased ROS detoxification by the mutant. In addition, interaction of macrophages with rtt109Δ/Δ cells did not lead to significant changes in the ROS levels when compared to the wild-type (Fig 8B).

Finally, we determined the resistance of hat1Δ/Δ cells to killing by bone marrow neutrophils. Strikingly, lack of Hat1 clearly increased the survival rate upon interaction with the immune cells. Furthermore, reintegration of HAT1 fully restored the wild-type sensitivity (Fig 8D). These data strongly suggest that genetic removal of HAT1 strongly promotes increased survival to neutrophil attack due to the impaired ROS accumulation.

Cells lacking Hat1 show reduced virulence but persist in mouse kidneys

Deletion of HAT1 causes reduced growth rate in vitro with morphological defects even in complete media (Fig 9A) [10], which has been shown to reduce virulence of several C. albicans mutants [28,30,60–63]. However, cells lacking Hat1 are also more resistant to killing by immune cells (Fig 8D). Therefore, we wanted to test how these seemingly opposing phenotypes caused by the deletion of HAT1 affect virulence of C. albicans. We used a mouse model of systemic candidiasis. Infection was performed via the tail vein and fungal burdens in kidneys were followed at day 1, 3 and 7. Interestingly, after 24 hours mice infected with the hat1Δ/Δ mutant showed significantly reduced CFUs in the kidneys when compared to the wild-type or the restored strain (Fig 9B). However, the fungal burden of the mutant increased until day 7 after infection reaching the levels of the wild-type and the reintegrant (Fig 9B). Thus, cells lacking Hat1 are not efficiently cleared from infected mice as they are able to compensate the in vitro growth defect in vivo. To further investigate the virulence properties of the hat1Δ/Δ strain, we determined the survival rate of infected mice. Interestingly, 15 days post infection the majority of wild-type infected mice had died, whereas all of the mice infected with the hat1Δ/Δ strain were still alive (Fig 9C). Even after 32 days, only one mouse infected with the hat1Δ/Δ mutant had died. Of note, mice infected with the reintegrant showed an intermediate survival rate, which was however not significant when compared to the wild-type strain (Fig 9C). Although the majority of mice survived the infection with cells lacking Hat1, mutant cells were not cleared from the kidneys in 4 out of 5 individuals (Fig 9D). Instead, the fungal burden stayed high until the end of the experiment. Furthermore, two mice survived infection with the restored strain and for both Candida was not cleared (Fig 9D). Thus, again the revertant strain showed an intermediate phenotype most likely due to haploinsufficiency.

We also determined the effect of deleting CAC2 in vivo using the same murine model of systemic infection as for the hat1Δ/Δ mutant. Interestingly enough, cac2Δ/Δ cells showed reduced fungal burdens at day 1 and 3 after infection. However, similar to the hat1Δ/Δ mutant, the strain lacking Cac2 was also protected from clearance by the immune system, since CFUs in kidneys increased during the course of the experiment (Fig 9E). In addition, body weight measurements of infected mice revealed a striking difference between the wild-type and hat1Δ/Δ as well as the cac2Δ/Δ cells. As expected, mice infected with the wild-type rapidly lost body weight after infection. However, upon infection with the hat1Δ/Δ or the cac2Δ/Δ strain, weight loss was clearly reduced, suggesting a reduced burden to the immune system or increased tolerance to the infecting fungal strain (S4A and S4B Fig).

Nonetheless, although showing increased persistence in the host, deletion of HAT1 strongly attenuates virulence in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis. Even though fungal burdens are comparable between the hat1Δ/Δ mutant and the wild-type 7 days post infection, the mutant is strongly attenuated in killing the host. Since kidney failure is the primary cause of death in this particular mouse infection model [64,65] we determined the degree of kidney injury or function in infected mice by measuring serum urea levels. As expected due to the lower fungal burden, mice infected with the hat1Δ/Δ mutant showed reduced urea levels at day 3. The reintegrant again yielded in an intermediate phenotype (Fig 9F). However, at day 7 lack of Hat1 still yielded in lower urea levels when compared to the wild-type (Fig 9F). Thus, lack of Hat1 seems to cause reduced kidney injury even at comparable fungal burdens. In summary, our data suggest that the hat1Δ/Δ strain is able to compensate its in vitro growth defect in vivo and persist in the host. However, cells lacking Hat1 are severely compromised in killing the host.

Discussion

Regulation of oxidative stress genes via chromatin assembly

In this work, we provide compelling evidence for a novel function of the eukaryotic histone acetyltransferase Hat1 in the pathogenic fungus C. albicans. Hat1 is required for regulating oxidative stress response, antifungal drug tolerance as well as virulence. We show that Hat1 functions in distinct chromatin assembly pathways acting in concert with well-known histone chaperones CAF-1 and HIR. Hence, in addition to an evolutionary conserved role of Hat1 in DNA damage repair [10,41,66,67] our data demonstrate a novel function for Hat1 in regulating the response to oxidative stress and azole treatment. Furthermore, certain resistance phenotypes as well as gene sets misregulated upon loss of Hat1 are also affected by distinct histone chaperones operating in independent chromatin assembly pathways. Thus, our data suggest that the Hat1 histone acetyltransferase has a central function in mediating the flux of histones necessary for nucleosome remodeling in C. albicans thereby affecting various cellular processes, including fungal virulence and persistence in the host.

Interestingly, the function in the regulation of the ROS response seems restricted to C. albicans and related fungal CTG clade members. This has not been reported in other organisms so far. This function of Hat1 might have developed only recently, providing an explanation why this is only observed in a small number of fungal species. Of note, Rtt109 from non-pathogenic S. cerevisiae negatively regulates catalase expression in response to H₂O₂ together with Asf1 via histone deposition, whereby lack of Asf1 or Rtt109 increases RNAPII recruitment [33]. Likewise, we detect increased RNAPII levels at several oxidative stress genes immediately after induction in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant (Fig 6). While the S. cerevisiae rtt109Δ mutant displays slightly increased H₂O₂ resistance (S5 Fig), the C. albicans RTT109 deletion fails to effect catalase induction or peroxide resistance (S1C and S2E Figs). Thus, it is very tempting to speculate that Hat1 and Rtt109 are involved in the regulation of distinct gene sets in different species. Noteworthy, Asf1 interacts with Hat1 in S. cerevisiae [68]. Whether Hat1 regulates oxidative stress response in C. albicans also via Asf1 remains unclear, since Asf1 is an essential gene in C. albicans. Asf1 is also essential in S. pombe and Drosophila melanogaster [69,70], implying increased functional redundancy in histone chaperone functions in S. cerevisiae when compared to C. albicans and other species.

Of particular interest is that Spt6 negatively regulates catalase expression in S. cerevisiae [33]. The observed H₂O₂ resistance phenotype of the C. albicans spt6Δ/Δ mutant might indicate conservation of this function in both species. Although interesting, further experiments are needed to determine the molecular mechanism(s) of oxidative stress regulation in cells lacking Spt6.

We show here that genetic removal HAT1 accelerates the induction kinetics of oxidative stress genes, including catalase as well as other genes encoding glutathione-utilizing enzymes. However, the lack of catalase in a hat1Δ/Δ background does not lower the H₂O₂ sensitivity to the level of the cat1Δ/Δ single knock-out (Fig 7C). On the other hand, the absence of Hat1 combined with defects in glutathione biosynthesis does not significantly increase H₂O₂ tolerance (Fig 7D). Therefore, the H₂O₂ resistance phenotype of the hat1Δ/Δ deletion strain is likely to be due to the upregulation of glutathione-utilizing enzymes, although a contribution of Cat1 cannot be fully excluded at this point.

Repression of genes via distinct chromatin assembly pathways

Interestingly, novel functions for the CAF-1 and HIR histone chaperone complexes in the regulation of white-opaque switching were reported for C. albicans [71]. The CAF-1 and HIR chaperone complexes are essential for histone deposition via distinct pathways. While the HIR complex functions in replication-independent chromatin assembly, CAF-1 is thought to mediate replication-coupled histone deposition [21,44,72].

To the best of our knowledge, no reports exist suggesting a role for Hat1 acting through the HIR complex to modulate antifungal drug resistance in any other eukaryote. Of note, this Hat1 function may have been conserved in some fungal species, since elevated azole tolerance is at least observed in S. pombe lacking the Hat1 orthologue. Of note, HAT1 is indeed repressed in C. albicans cells treated with itraconazole, implying a function for Hat1 in the regulation of azole susceptibility [73]. Furthermore, our RNA-Seq data demonstrate a downregulation of ergosterol biosynthesis genes in the hat1Δ/Δ strain, including ERG3 whose lack confers pronounced azole resistance [74]. Thus, a similar mechanism may explain the reduced susceptibility of hat1Δ/Δ and hir1Δ/Δ strains. Another mechanism mediating the increased azole tolerance could be the upregulation of multidrug transporters [75,76]. The two major ATP-binding cassette transporters responsible for azole resistance in C. albicans are Cdr1 and Cdr2 [77–80]. Whereas only CDR2 was slightly upregulated in hat1Δ/Δ cells, the major facilitator superfamily transporter Mdr1, which is also induced upon oxidative stress and confers azole resistance [77,81], is significantly upregulated in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant upon treatment with H₂O₂ (S1 Table). However, the exact mechanism by which Hat1 and Hir1 regulate azole tolerance remains to be determined in future studies.

Although, the CAF-1 complex can assemble histones in a replication-coupled manner, it can also influence the rate of replication-independent histone incorporation and transcription [22,82,83]. Therefore, NuB4 and CAF-1 might act in concert to regulate specific target genes such as oxidative stress response sets in C. albicans. We propose that they do so by facilitating histone incorporation concomitant with transcription, thereby increasing the histone density. Indeed, we observe a large overlap in differentially expressed gene sets in hat1Δ/Δ and the cac2Δ/Δ mutants, the latter lacking a subunit of CAF-1 (Fig 4D and 4E). Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain a hat1Δ/Δ cac2Δ/Δ double deletion strain for epistasis analysis. Thus, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that Hat1 and Cac2 regulate H₂O₂ resistance independently. One explanation for a possible synthetic lethality of hat1Δ/Δ cac2Δ/Δ double mutants may be that both are associated with essential DNA replication [21,84,85].

The genome-wide transcriptional RNA-Seq profiling of logarithmically growing hat1Δ/Δ cells mainly revealed upregulation of genes, suggesting repressive functions of Hat1. Notably, distinct GO terms are enriched in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant alone or in overlaps with other mutants. These data suggest specific functions for Hat1 in different processes, including DNA damage repair, arginine biosynthesis and mitochondrial degradation (Fig 5). Interestingly, Rtt109 inhibits arginine biosynthesis genes in S. cerevisiae together with Asf1 under repressing conditions [86]. By contrast, this gene set is derepressed in C. albicans hat1Δ/Δ and cac2Δ/Δ, but not in rtt109Δ/Δ cells (Fig 5B and 5C). Thus, we believe that Hat1/Cac2 have taken over this function from Rtt109 in C. albicans. Interestingly enough, mitochondrial dysfunction has been linked to azole and oxidative stress sensitivity in C. albicans, as well as in other fungal species [87–89]. However, depletion of Fzo1, which is involved in mitochondrial fusion, and Goa1, a protein localizing to mitochondria upon oxidant treatment [87,88], decreases azole and oxidative stress tolerance. Thus, although genes involved in mitochondrion degradation are upregulated in hat1Δ/Δ cells, the loss of mitochondrial function is unlikely to explain the increase in stress resistance.

Interestingly, upon H₂O₂ treatment we observed increased expression of genes involved in ncRNA/rRNA processing specifically in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant (Fig 5E and 5F). However, this group of genes is repressed in the wild-type upon H₂O₂ stress. Only 4 out of a total of 119 hat1Δ/Δ upregulated genes in this group were less than 2-fold repressed in the wild-type. Thus, lack of Hat1 seems to cause a defect in repression of genes involved in ncRNA/rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis. Although a faster induction kinetics of genes connected to H₂O₂ resistance occurs upon loss of Hat1 (Fig 6A and 6D), many oxidative stress-regulated genes appear not significantly modulated in the RNA-Seq dataset making GO term enrichment for this group futile. A possible explanation is that many stress conditions in fungi, including oxidative stress or osmostress, follow a stress-specific and often transient regulation [90], which may result in difficulties choosing the correct timing for collecting data points in hat1Δ/Δ and wild-type cells. Nevertheless, we speculate that the Hat1-mediated oxidative stress regulation may relate to host infection conditions, where severe oxidative stress is a major immune defense during phagocytosis of fungal pathogens [26,91].

Inactivation of Hat1 compromises virulence in C. albicans

Although infection of macrophages or neutrophils by the hat1Δ/Δ mutant strongly reduces total ROS accumulation, we observed faster accumulation of ROS in the beginning of the interaction (Fig 8B and S3A Fig). Differences in ROS production cannot be simply explained by the pseudohyphal morphology of cells lacking Hat1, since the rtt109Δ/Δ strain has the same morphological defect [30] yet does not show any differences in ROS accumulation (Fig 8B). Thus, it may specifically result from Hat1-mediated gene regulation and from upregulated factors triggering ROS production. Interestingly enough, a mouse model of virulence yields compelling data showing that hat1Δ/Δ cells display strongly attenuated virulence. Of note, infected mice show significantly reduced organ burdens of hat1Δ/Δ cells immediately after infection, but reach comparable levels of fungal burdens between day 3 and day 7 post infection (Fig 9B). This implies a faster growth in vivo, which may be explained by the reduced susceptibility to neutrophil-mediated killing, essentially providing a “fitness” advantage of hat1Δ/Δ in vivo. Moreover, cells lacking Hat1 cause less damage to host organs and therefore enable better mouse survival. Reduced urea levels in sera of infected mice support this notion (Fig 9F). In line with this hypothesis is also the fact that hat1Δ/Δ cells degrade ROS more efficiently, protecting the hat1Δ/Δ mutant from clearance by the immune surveillance. This may also result in reduced tissue damage, since reactive oxygen species originating from innate immune response are harming both the pathogen and the host due to increasing inflammation [92,93]. Indeed, a downmodulation of the inflammatory immune response can be beneficial for the host during invasive Candida albicans infections [65,94]. Finally, ROS is also known as a signaling molecule during infections and reduced levels upon challenge with the hat1Δ/Δ mutant might impact the immune response [95].

Furthermore, compelling evidence exists suggesting that the hat1Δ/Δ virulence phenotype is not just due to its role in DNA damage repair. Deletion of RAD52 or RTT109 also causes pseudohyphal cell morphology and strong virulence defects in mouse models of systemic candidiasis [28,30,96]. However, the rtt109Δ/Δ mutant is efficiently cleared from kidneys of infected mice 3 days post infection [30]. Likewise, kidney fungal burdens of rad52Δ/Δ cells decline over 3 days post infection even with an inoculum concentration ten times higher than in our setup [28]. By sharp contrast, the hat1Δ/Δ fungal burdens in kidneys increase, reaching wild-type levels 7 days post infection. Nonetheless, despite increased growth in vivo, removal of Hat1 renders cells unable to kill the host efficiently over 32 days, consistent with a persistent but avirulent invasive infection (Fig 9C).

Evolution of specialized functions for chromatin assembly pathways in C. albicans

Our data unequivocally show that loss of Hat1, Cac2 and Hir1 can be beneficial for C. albicans in our experimental setup. However, the inability to efficiently repress genes under stress conditions might also be detrimental for the organism. Furthermore, loss of Hat1 and Cac2 also impairs DNA damage repair and thus promotes genome instability [10,71]. Thus, the resulting fitness loss due to the absence of these factors might be disadvantageous in the long run, despite a gain in oxidative resistance. Further experiments are required to identify additional factors functioning together with NuB4/CAF-1 and NuB4/HIR in the regulation of oxidative stress resistance or azole tolerance. This might also lead to the discovery of potential antifungal targets, which could be used to render cells more sensitive to ROS or azoles. Importantly, the data from the mouse model imply that inhibitors of HATs could have beneficial effects in clinical therapeutic settings but pose the risk of promoting persistent or latent infections.

Interestingly, we don’t observe comparable resistance phenotypes upon genetic removal of Hat1 in S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata and at least for the oxidative stress resistance also in S. pombe (Fig 3). Thus, in C. albicans, the NuB4 and CAF-1 complexes might have gained functions during coevolution with the human host, which appears restricted to the CTG clade. Hence, deletion of HAT1 in C. glabrata, the second-most prevalent human fungal pathogen [24], does not result in similar phenotypes. Nonetheless, our results clearly demonstrate substantial differences in the functions of even highly conserved chromatin modification mechanisms between C. albicans and other fungi. Therefore, results obtained from classical model systems such as baker’s yeast often cannot simply be transferred to pathogenic fungi.

The regulation of virulence-associated traits by chromatin modification has been reported for several pathogens and it is now generally accepted that the chromatin status affects virulence [97,98]. Moreover, several reports suggest that chromatin modifiers are involved in the regulation of fungal virulence factors including antifungal drug tolerance [97,99–102]. Hence, modulation of chromatin function or chromatin-modifying pathways including nucleosome remodeling may be a common strategy during coevolution of microbial pathogens with the host to promote immune evasion.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were evaluated by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna and approved by the Federal Ministry for Science and Research, Vienna, Austria (GZ: BMWF- 68.20n5/231-II/3b/2011) adhering to European legislation for animal experimentation.

Media, chemicals and growth conditions

Rich medium (YPD) and synthetic complete medium (SC) were prepared as previously described [103]. Minimal medium contained 8.38 g/l yeast nitrogen base (BD Biosciences), 6.25 g/l ammonium sulfate (Sigma Aldrich) and 2 g/l glucose (Sigma Aldrich). Fungal strains were routinely grown on YPD plates at 30°C. Hydrogen peroxide, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, Calcofluor White, Congo Red, cadmium chloride, sodium chloride, luminol and HRP Type VI were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Voriconazole, Itraconazole and Amphotericin B were purchased from Discovery Fine Chemicals Ltd. DMEM and RPMI media were purchased from PAA.

Plasmid and strain construction and genomic verification

A list of fungal strains, plasmids and primers used in this study is shown in Tables A, B and C in S1 Text, respectively. All C. albicans strains constructed in this work were derived from the clinical isolate SC5314 [104]. For deletion of HAT1 in C. parapsilosis the clinical isolate GA1 was used [105]. Disruption of HAT1 in C. tropicalis was done in the clinical isolate AKH2249. Deletion of CAC2 and HIR1 was done using a modified version of the SAT1 flipper method [106]. Briefly, the marker cassette was amplified using the pSFS3b plasmid and primers containing some 80bp homologous region to replace the whole coding sequence of the corresponding gene [10]. For deletion of RTT106 two primer pairs were used to add the homologous regions in two sequential PCR steps. For deletion of CAT1, YEp352-SAT1-CAT1urdr was constructed by in vivo cloning in S. cerevisiae exactly as described previously [107]. Plasmids for deletion of GCS1, GSH2, C. tropicalis HAT1 and C. parapsilosis HAT1 were constructed by fusing ~500bp fragments upstream and downstream of the corresponding gene with a FRT-FLP-NAT1-FRT cassette derived from pSFS3b [10] and a fragment containing an ampicillin resistance cassette and an E. coli replication origin derived from YEp352 [108] via in vivo recombination in E. coli EL350 as described in [109]. Due to low transformation efficiency for C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis a second set of deletion vectors was constructed in the same way to obtain the homozygous knock-outs. These vectors contained 300–350bp of the beginning and the end of the corresponding CDS for homologous recombination to avoid integration at the deleted allele. For construction of the CAC2 reintegration plasmid the coding sequence plus ~500 up- and downstream was amplified and cloned into pSFS3b via KpnI and ApaI. Transformation of C. albicans was done via electroporation [106]. Correct integration of the deletion cassette and loss of the corresponding gene were confirmed by colony PCR.

Colony PCR assays were used to verify correct genomic integration of deletion constructs. Briefly, a colony was resuspended in 25 μl H₂O in a PCR tube and incubated at 95°C for 10 minutes. Cell debris was spun down briefly and 5 μl of the supernatant was used as template for the PCR, which was performed using the DreamTaq Green DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Spot dilution and liquid survival/growth inhibition assays

Spot dilution assays were performed as described previously [10]. For determination of H₂O₂ survival logarithmically growing cells in YPD were treated with the indicated concentrations of hydrogen peroxide for 2 hours at 30°C. Before and after treatment cells were diluted and plated on YPD plates. For the H₂O₂ survival shown in Fig 7D cells were grown overnight in minimal medium, diluted to OD₆₀₀ of 0.2 and further incubated at 30°C for 5 hours. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500 g for 3 minutes, resuspended at an OD₆₀₀ of 0.5 and treated with 0.5 mM H₂O₂ for 2 hours. Before and after treatment cells were diluted and plated on YPD plates containing 1 mM glutathione. Colonies were counted after 3 days incubation at 30°C and viability was determined relative to the samples plated before H₂O₂ addition. To quantify growth inhibition by azole treatment cells were grown to logarithmic phase in SC medium at 30°C. Cultures were diluted to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.01 in SC medium with or without voriconazole at the indicated concentrations. OD₆₀₀ was determined after growth at 30°C for 18–24 hours. For C. parapsilosis cultures were incubated for 41 hours due to the slow growth rate of the hat1Δ/Δ mutant. Growth inhibition was calculated relative to untreated controls.

RNA isolation, RT-qPCR analysis and RNA-seq

Cells were grown in YPD overnight to an OD₆₀₀ of 1 at 30°C. For hydrogen peroxide treatment 1.6 mM H₂O₂ was added to the culture for the indicated period of time. RNA isolation and qPCR analysis was done as described previously [10]. For RT-qPCRs shown in Fig 8A, RIP1 was used as reference gene [99]. All other RT-qPCRs were normalized to PAT1 [110].

After RNA isolation, 10 μg total RNA were treated with DNase I (Thermo Scientific) and purified using the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). 5 μg DNase treated RNA were used for rRNA depletion with the RiboMinus Eukaryote System v2 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). rRNA depleted samples were fragmented using the NEBNext Magnesium RNA Fragmentation Module (New England Biolabs) and purified with the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was used for first strand synthesis. Priming was done with 3 μg random hexamers (Life Technologies). Samples were purified using Mini Quick Spin Columns (Roche) and second strand synthesis was done with the NEBNext mRNA Second Strand Synthesis Module (New England Biolabs). Final purification of double stranded cDNA was done with the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Samples were further processed and sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 instrument (Illumina) at the Next Generation Sequencing Facility (CSF NGS unit, http://www.csf.ac.at) of the Campus Vienna Biocenter. For both conditions five biological replicates for the wild-type as well as the hat1Δ/Δ strain and three biological replicates for the cac2Δ/Δ as well as the rtt109Δ/Δ mutants were sequenced.

Reads were mapped onto the Assembly 21 of the C. albicans genome (http://www.candidagenome.org) using NextGenMap [111]. Read counts were determined with HTSeq using the union mode [112] and a reference annotation (C_albicans_SC5314_version_A21-s02-m07-r10; http://www.candidagenome.org). The annotation of the coding sequence assembly was used as transcript coordinates. For short non-coding RNAs (tRNAs, snRNAs, snoRNAs and ncRNAs) 20bp up- and downstream of their chromosomal coordinates were added before mapping [113]. Differential expression analysis was done with edgeR [114]. Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-values were used to determine differentially regulated genes [115]. Venn diagrams were created using Venny 1.0 [116]. Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment was determined using the GO Term finder (http://www.candidagenome.org). Overlapping GO terms were merged manually.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously [113]. One mg whole cell extract was used per ChIP. For determination of histone density an antibody against the C-terminus of histone H3 was used (ab1791, Abcam). Detection of RNAPII was done with an antibody against the C-terminal domain (05–592, clone 8WG16, Millipore). To analyze the CAT1 promoter region primers amplifying a fragment ranging from -315 to -163 with respect to the start codon were used. To determine enrichment within the CAT1, GPX1 and GST1 genes primers within these coding regions were used. Signals were normalized to an intergenic region on chromosome R.

Enzymatic assays, immunoblotting and mass spectrometric analysis

To quantify catalase activity, cells were grown overnight to an OD₆₀₀ of 1 at 30°C. For hydrogen peroxide treatment 1.6 mM H₂O₂ was added to the culture for one hour. Before and after treatment 20 ml culture were harvested at 1500 g for 3 min at 4°C and washed once with 20 ml cold H₂O. Pellets were resuspended in 250 μl lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5; 10% glycerol, complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)] and an equal volume of glass beads (425–600mm, Sigma Aldrich) was added. Cells were lysed by shaking 5 times at 6 m s^-1 for 30 s on a FastPrep instrument (MP Biomedicals). Extracts were cleared by centrifugation at 14000 g for 5 min at 4°C. Protein concentration in the extracts was determined by measuring absorption at 280 nm. For catalase activity measurement 5–40 μl whole cell extract were added to 3 ml of catalase assay buffer [384 mM Na₃PO₄; 0.015 mM Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich); 11.4 mM H₂O₂] and degradation of H₂O₂ was determined by measuring absorbance at 240 nm for up to 2 min. Catalase activity was calculated in μM H₂O₂ per minute per mg of whole cell extract as described previously [117] (ε = 43.6).

Glutathione peroxidase assays were performed as previously described [118] using some modifications. The lysis buffer used contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 g/100 ml Nonidet P-40 and complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Cell lysis was performed as described for the catalase assay. 10–50 μl cleared whole cell extract was used for the assay exactly as described in [118].

Sample preparation and western blot analysis were essentially carried out as described previously [119]. A MOI of 5:1 (fungi to macrophages) was used and samples were harvested after 30 min of interaction. Activated NADPH oxidase was detected using an antibody against the phosphorylated p40phox subunit (Cell Signaling 4311). A panERK antibody (BD 610123) was used as loading control.

Whole cell extracts for mass spectrometric analysis were prepared by lysing logarithmically growing cells in MS lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5; complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)] with a French press. Extracts were lyophilized, resuspended in 2 M urea and used for trypsin digestion followed by liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry analysis on a LTQ Orbitrap Velos system (Thermo Scientific).

Mouse strains and immune cells (bone marrow-derived macrophages and neutrophils)

For all experiments, 7–10 week old C57BL/6 wild-type mice were used. Isolation and cultivation of primary bone marrow-derived macrophages was done as described previously [26]. Isolation of bone marrow neutrophils and subsequent C. albicans survival assays were performed as described earlier [65]. A MOI of 1:10 (fungi to neutrophils) was used, and cells were harvested after a 1-hour interaction.

Mouse infections were carried out through lateral tail vein injections as described previously with some minor modifications [65]. Briefly, C. albicans strains were grown overnight to an OD₆₀₀ of around 1, washed twice and finally resuspended in PBS. For infection, 1 x 10⁵ Candida cells per 21 g mouse body weight were injected via the lateral tail vein. For survival experiments, mice were monitored for 32 days. Analysis of fungal burdens in the kidneys at day 1, 3 and 7 post infection, as well as determination of serum urea levels was done exactly as described previously [65]. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Prism software (Graphpad Software Inc.).

ROS and phagocytosis assays

ROS assays were done exactly as described previously [26]. The multiplicity of infection (MOI) for all ROS assays was 5:1 (fungi to immune cells). Phagocytosis assays were performed essentially as described with some modifications [119]. C. albicans cells were grown overnight to an OD₆₀₀ of around 1, washed twice in PBS and stained with 10 mg ml^-1 Alexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies) in 100 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) for 60 min at 30°C shaking in the dark. After staining cells were washed 3 times, resuspended in HEPES buffer and used for interaction with BMDMs. Stained Candida cells were added to macrophages and incubated for 45 min at 37°C and 5% CO₂. Control reactions were kept on ice during the whole procedure. A MOI of 2:1 (fungi to macrophages) was used. Phagocytosis was terminated by chilling on ice. Plates remained on ice during subsequent detaching and fixation in 1% formaldehyde. Extracellular fluorescent C. albicans cells were quenched by addition of 0.4% trypan blue. Samples were subject to flow cytometry analysis with FL1-H on a FACSCalibur instrument (BD Biosciences).

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Loss of Hat1 causes oxidative stress resistance.

(A) Resistance to other stress conditions is unchanged in hat1Δ/Δ cells. CFW: Calcofluor White; CR: Congo Red; AmB: Amphotericin B; (B) Loss of Hat1 increases resistance to diamide. (C) Lack of proteins involved in DNA damage repair does not increase resistance to H₂O₂. (D) Deletion of CAC2 causes increased tBOOH resistance. Loss of Rtt109 does not affect tBOOH resistance. (A-D) Fivefold serial dilutions of the indicated strains were spotted on agar plates containing the indicated substances and pictures were taken after incubation at 30°C for 3 days.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.4MB, tif)}

S2 Fig. Deletion of HAT1 causes upregulation of tRNAs and CAT1.

(A) Treatment with 1.6 mM H₂O₂ does not kill C. albicans. Cells of the indicated strains were treated for 1 hour, plated and colonies counted after 3 days of incubation on YPD plates at 30°C to determine viability. Data are shown as mean + SD from two independent experiments. (B) H₂O₂ repressed ncRNAs are upregulated in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant upon peroxide treatment. Each dot corresponds to one ncRNA. The fold change in RNA expression between H₂O₂ treated wild-type and hat1Δ/Δ strains (y-axis) is plotted against the fold change between the wild-type without and with treatment (x-axis). Differentially expressed ncRNAs (fold change > = 2 and p-value <0.05) in the hat1Δ/Δ mutant are depicted in red. logFC: log2 fold change; (C) GO terms enriched among 1.5-fold upregulated proteins in logarithmically growing hat1Δ/Δ cells are shown. Expression levels were determined by mass spectrometric analysis as described in the Materials and Methods section. Fold changes relative to the wild-type were calculated using the spectra counts. The corresponding p-values for the enrichment (empty bars) and the percentage of proteins changed within the GO group (filled bars) are presented. The absolute number of regulated proteins within a GO group is presented in brackets. (D) Derepression of CAT1 in logarithmically growing cells was detected by RT-qPCR. Transcript levels were normalized to the expression level of the reference gene (RG) PAT1. Data are shown as mean + SD from 3 independent experiments. (E) Increased CAT1 induction levels were only observed for hat1Δ/Δ and cac2Δ/Δ cells, but not for cells lacking Rtt109. Cells were treated with 1.6 mM H₂O₂ for 30 min. Transcript levels were normalized to the expression level of PAT1. Data are shown as mean + SD from 3 independent experiments. (C-D) *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 relative to the corresponding control (Student's t-test).

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(246.4KB, tif)}

S3 Fig. Loss of Hat1 causes reduced ROS accumulation upon interaction with neutrophils.

(A) ROS levels were determined by measuring luminol-dependent chemiluminescence [relative luciferase units (RLU) min^-1 per 1000 immune cells] in 2.5 min intervals during interaction of the indicated C. albicans strains with murine bone marrow neutrophils. One representative experiment is shown. Data were reproduced in two independent experiments. (B) Cells lacking Hat1 are phagocytosed at the same rate as the wild-type. Phagocytosis was quantified by measuring the fraction of BMDMs containing labelled C. albicans cells upon 45 min interaction at 37°C (5% CO₂) by FACS. Control reactions were kept at 4°C. BMDMs without C. albicans were also included (Mphs only). One representative experiment is shown. Data were reproduced in two independent experiments. FL1-H: FITC intensity (C) NADPH oxidase is activated to the same extent upon infection with wild-type or hat1Δ/Δ cells. Activation of the NADPH oxidase in BMDMs upon 30 min interaction was determined by detection of the phosphorylated p40phox subunit. ERK levels served as loading control. An uninfected control was included (wo Ca). The asterisk marks a cross reaction. One representative experiment is shown. Data were reproduced in two independent experiments.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(337.8KB, tif)}

S4 Fig. Reduced body weight loss upon infection with hat1Δ/Δ or cac2Δ/Δ cells.

(A and B) Body weight of mice infected with the indicated Candida strains was determined daily until day 6 post infection (p.i.). Significance was determined relative to wild-type infected mice using Two-way ANOVA. ***P<0.001.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(100.5KB, tif)}

S5 Fig. Deletion of RTT109 in S. cerevisiae increases H₂O₂ resistance.

Fivefold serial dilutions of the indicated strains were spotted on agar plates containing the indicated substances and pictures were taken after incubation at 30°C for 3 days.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(311.5KB, tif)}

S1 Table. RNA-Seq results.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4.6MB, xlsx)}

S1 Text. Fungal strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study.

Table A. Fungal strains used in this study. Table B. Plasmids used in this study. Table C. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(81.5KB, docx)}

Acknowledgments

We thank all laboratory members for helpful discussions. We are grateful to Joseph Bliss for providing the C. albicans strains JMB220 and JMB31, Anthony Annunziato for sending the S. pombe strains 975 and LBP6, Attila Gácser for the gift of the C. parapsilosis strain GA1, and Birgit Willinger for providing the clinical isolate C. tropicalis strain AKH2249. C. albicans sequence data were obtained from the Stanford Genome Center (http://www.candidagenome.org).

Data Availability

Data have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE73409.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a grant from the Austrian Science Fund (Project FWF-P-25333) to KK, and in part by funds from a joint research cluster of the University of Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna to KK and AvH. NC was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH RO1AI46223). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ (1997) Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389: 251–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Chen CC, Carson JJ, Feser J, Tamburini B, Zabaronick S, et al. (2008) Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134: 231–243. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Franco AA, Lam WM, Burgers PM, Kaufman PD (2005) Histone deposition protein Asf1 maintains DNA replisome integrity and interacts with replication factor C. Genes Dev 19: 1365–1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Kaplan CD, Laprade L, Winston F (2003) Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 301: 1096–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Saunders A, Werner J, Andrulis ED, Nakayama T, Hirose S, et al. (2003) Tracking FACT and the RNA polymerase II elongation complex through chromatin in vivo . Science 301: 1094–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Schwabish MA, Struhl K (2004) Evidence for eviction and rapid deposition of histones upon transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 24: 10111–10117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA (2005) Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Nature 438: 379–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Parthun MR (2012) Histone acetyltransferase 1: More than just an enzyme? Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 256–263. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Parthun MR, Widom J, Gottschling DE (1996) The major cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase in yeast: links to chromatin replication and histone metabolism. Cell 87: 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Tscherner M, Stappler E, Hnisz D, Kuchler K (2012) The histone acetyltransferase Hat1 facilitates DNA damage repair and morphogenesis in Candida albicans . Mol Microbiol 86: 1197–1214. 10.1111/mmi.12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Parthun MR (2007) Hat1: the emerging cellular roles of a type B histone acetyltransferase. Oncogene 26: 5319–5328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Poveda A, Pamblanco M, Tafrov S, Tordera V, Sternglanz R, et al. (2004) Hif1 is a component of yeast histone acetyltransferase B, a complex mainly localized in the nucleus. J Biol Chem 279: 16033–16043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Driscoll R, Hudson A, Jackson SP (2007) Yeast Rtt109 promotes genome stability by acetylating histone H3 on lysine 56. Science 315: 649–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Kelly TJ, Qin S, Gottschling DE, Parthun MR (2000) Type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p participates in telomeric silencing. Mol Cell Biol 20: 7051–7058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Tong K, Keller T, Hoffman CS, Annunziato AT (2012) Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hat1 (Kat1) is associated with Mis16 and is required for telomeric silencing. Eukaryot Cell 11: 1095–1103. 10.1128/EC.00123-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Barman HK, Takami Y, Nishijima H, Shibahara K, Sanematsu F, et al. (2008) Histone acetyltransferase-1 regulates integrity of cytosolic histone H3–H4 containing complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 373: 624–630. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Campos EI, Fillingham J, Li G, Zheng H, Voigt P, et al. (2010) The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1343–1351. 10.1038/nsmb.1911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Yang X, Li L, Liang J, Shi L, Yang J, et al. (2013) Histone acetyltransferase 1 promotes homologous recombination in DNA repair by facilitating histone turnover. J Biol Chem 288: 18271–18282. 10.1074/jbc.M113.473199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Das C, Tyler JK, Churchill ME (2010) The histone shuffle: histone chaperones in an energetic dance. Trends Biochem Sci 35: 476–489. 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Huang S, Zhou H, Tarara J, Zhang Z (2007) A novel role for histone chaperones CAF-1 and Rtt106p in heterochromatin silencing. EMBO J 26: 2274–2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Shibahara K, Stillman B (1999) Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 96: 575–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Yu Z, Wu H, Chen H, Wang R, Liang X, et al. (2013) CAF-1 promotes Notch signaling through epigenetic control of target gene expression during Drosophila development. Development 140: 3635–3644. 10.1242/dev.094599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Spector MS, Raff A, DeSilva H, Lee K, Osley MA (1997) Hir1p and Hir2p function as transcriptional corepressors to regulate histone gene transcription in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 17: 545–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ (2007) Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 20: 133–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Santos MA, Gomes AC, Santos MC, Carreto LC, Moura GR (2011) The genetic code of the fungal CTG clade. C R Biol 334: 607–611. 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Frohner IE, Bourgeois C, Yatsyk K, Majer O, Kuchler K (2009) Candida albicans cell surface superoxide dismutases degrade host-derived reactive oxygen species to escape innate immune surveillance. Mol Microbiol 71: 240–252. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06528.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Pfaller MA, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Diekema DJ, Espinel-Ingroff A, et al. (2011) Clinical breakpoints for voriconazole and Candida spp. revisited: review of microbiologic, molecular, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data as they pertain to the development of species-specific interpretive criteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 70: 330–343. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Chauhan N, Ciudad T, Rodriguez-Alejandre A, Larriba G, Calderone R, et al. (2005) Virulence and karyotype analyses of rad52 mutants of Candida albicans: regeneration of a truncated chromosome of a reintegrant strain (rad52/RAD52) in the host. Infect Immun 73: 8069–8078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Hao B, Clancy CJ, Cheng S, Raman SB, Iczkowski KA, et al. (2009) Candida albicans RFX2 encodes a DNA binding protein involved in DNA damage responses, morphogenesis, and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 8: 627–639. 10.1128/EC.00246-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Lopes da Rosa J, Boyartchuk VL, Zhu LJ, Kaufman PD (2010) Histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 is required for Candida albicans pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1594–1599. 10.1073/pnas.0912427107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Tierney L, Linde J, Muller S, Brunke S, Molina JC, et al. (2012) An Interspecies Regulatory Network Inferred from Simultaneous RNA-seq of Candida albicans Invading Innate Immune Cells. Front Microbiol 3: 85 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Fradin C, De Groot P, MacCallum D, Schaller M, Klis F, et al. (2005) Granulocytes govern the transcriptional response, morphology and proliferation of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol Microbiol 56: 397–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Klopf E, Paskova L, Sole C, Mas G, Petryshyn A, et al. (2009) Cooperation between the INO80 complex and histone chaperones determines adaptation of stress gene transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Cell Biol 29: 4994–5007. 10.1128/MCB.01858-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Adkins MW, Howar SR, Tyler JK (2004) Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. Mol Cell 14: 657–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Adkins MW, Tyler JK (2006) Transcriptional activators are dispensable for transcription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions. Mol Cell 21: 405–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Shivaswamy S, Iyer VR (2008) Stress-dependent dynamics of global chromatin remodeling in yeast: dual role for SWI/SNF in the heat shock stress response. Mol Cell Biol 28: 2221–2234. 10.1128/MCB.01659-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Zabaronick SR, Tyler JK (2005) The histone chaperone anti-silencing function 1 is a global regulator of transcription independent of passage through S phase. Mol Cell Biol 25: 652–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Zunder RM, Rine J (2012) Direct interplay among histones, histone chaperones, and a chromatin boundary protein in the control of histone gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 32: 4337–4349. 10.1128/MCB.00871-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Kristjuhan A, Svejstrup JQ (2004) Evidence for distinct mechanisms facilitating transcript elongation through chromatin in vivo . EMBO J 23: 4243–4252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Mellor J (2006) Dynamic nucleosomes and gene transcription. Trends Genet 22: 320–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Ge Z, Wang H, Parthun MR (2011) Nuclear Hat1p complex (NuB4) components participate in DNA repair-linked chromatin reassembly. J Biol Chem 286: 16790–16799. 10.1074/jbc.M110.216846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Mersfelder EL, Parthun MR (2008) Involvement of Hat1p (Kat1p) catalytic activity and subcellular localization in telomeric silencing. J Biol Chem 283: 29060–29068. 10.1074/jbc.M802564200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Qin S, Parthun MR (2006) Recruitment of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p to chromatin is linked to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3649–3658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Green EM, Antczak AJ, Bailey AO, Franco AA, Wu KJ, et al. (2005) Replication-independent histone deposition by the HIR complex and Asf1. Curr Biol 15: 2044–2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Huang S, Zhou H, Katzmann D, Hochstrasser M, Atanasova E, et al. (2005) Rtt106p is a histone chaperone involved in heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 13410–13415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Marheineke K, Krude T (1998) Nucleosome assembly activity and intracellular localization of human CAF-1 changes during the cell division cycle. J Biol Chem 273: 15279–15286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Verreault A, Kaufman PD, Kobayashi R, Stillman B (1996) Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 87: 95–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Zhang H, Han J, Kang B, Burgess R, Zhang Z (2012) Human histone acetyltransferase 1 protein preferentially acetylates H4 histone molecules in H3.1-H4 over H3.3-H4. J Biol Chem 287: 6573–6581. 10.1074/jbc.M111.312637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Silva AC, Xu X, Kim HS, Fillingham J, Kislinger T, et al. (2012) The replication-independent histone H3–H4 chaperones HIR, ASF1, and RTT106 co-operate to maintain promoter fidelity. J Biol Chem 287: 1709–1718. 10.1074/jbc.M111.316489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Nair DM, Ge Z, Mersfelder EL, Parthun MR (2011) Genetic interactions between POB3 and the acetylation of newly synthesized histones. Curr Genet 57: 271–286. 10.1007/s00294-011-0347-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Buurman ET, Jiang W, McCoy M, Averett DR, Thompson CM, et al. (2002) Validation of Cdc68p as a novel antifungal target. Arch Microbiol 178: 428–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Davis DA, Bruno VM, Loza L, Filler SG, Mitchell AP (2002) Candida albicans Mds3p, a conserved regulator of pH responses and virulence identified through insertional mutagenesis. Genetics 162: 1573–1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Al-Rawi N, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM (2010) Deletion of Candida albicans SPT6 is not lethal but results in defective hyphal growth. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 288–296. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Wysong DR, Christin L, Sugar AM, Robbins PW, Diamond RD (1998) Cloning and sequencing of a Candida albicans catalase gene and effects of disruption of this gene. Infect Immun 66: 1953–1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Lamarre C, LeMay JD, Deslauriers N, Bourbonnais Y (2001) Candida albicans expresses an unusual cytoplasmic manganese-containing superoxide dismutase (SOD3 gene product) upon the entry and during the stationary phase. J Biol Chem 276: 43784–43791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Ma LH, Takanishi CL, Wood MJ (2007) Molecular mechanism of oxidative stress perception by the Orp1 protein. J Biol Chem 282: 31429–31436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Ardehali MB, Yao J, Adelman K, Fuda NJ, Petesch SJ, et al. (2009) Spt6 enhances the elongation rate of RNA polymerase II in vivo . EMBO J 28: 1067–1077. 10.1038/emboj.2009.56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Baek YU, Kim YR, Yim HS, Kang SO (2004) Disruption of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase results in absolute glutathione auxotrophy and apoptosis in Candida albicans . FEBS Lett 556: 47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Shahana S, Childers DS, Ballou ER, Bohovych I, Odds FC, et al. (2014) New Clox Systems for rapid and efficient gene disruption in Candida albicans . PLoS One 9: e100390 10.1371/journal.pone.0100390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Hwang CS, Oh JH, Huh WK, Yim HS, Kang SO (2003) Ssn6, an important factor of morphological conversion and virulence in Candida albicans . Mol Microbiol 47: 1029–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Chang P, Fan X, Chen J (2015) Function and subcellular localization of Gcn5, a histone acetyltransferase in Candida albicans . Fungal Genet Biol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Lee JE, Oh JH, Ku M, Kim J, Lee JS, et al. (2015) Ssn6 has dual roles in Candida albicans filament development through the interaction with Rpd31. FEBS Lett 589: 513–520. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Murad AM, Leng P, Straffon M, Wishart J, Macaskill S, et al. (2001) NRG1 represses yeast-hypha morphogenesis and hypha-specific gene expression in Candida albicans . EMBO J 20: 4742–4752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Lionakis MS, Lim JK, Lee CC, Murphy PM (2011) Organ-specific innate immune responses in a mouse model of invasive candidiasis. J Innate Immun 3: 180–199. 10.1159/000321157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65. Majer O, Bourgeois C, Zwolanek F, Lassnig C, Kerjaschki D, et al. (2012) Type I interferons promote fatal immunopathology by regulating inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils during Candida infections . PLoS Pathog 8: e1002811 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Benson LJ, Phillips JA, Gu Y, Parthun MR, Hoffman CS, et al. (2007) Properties of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1: H4 tail interaction, site preference, and involvement in DNA repair. J Biol Chem 282: 836–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Barman HK, Takami Y, Ono T, Nishijima H, Sanematsu F, et al. (2006) Histone acetyltransferase 1 is dispensable for replication-coupled chromatin assembly but contributes to recover DNA damages created following replication blockage in vertebrate cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345: 1547–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Fillingham J, Recht J, Silva AC, Suter B, Emili A, et al. (2008) Chaperone control of the activity and specificity of the histone H3 acetyltransferase Rtt109. Mol Cell Biol 28: 4342–4353. 10.1128/MCB.00182-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Schulz LL, Tyler JK (2006) The histone chaperone ASF1 localizes to active DNA replication forks to mediate efficient DNA replication. FASEB J 20: 488–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Umehara T, Chimura T, Ichikawa N, Horikoshi M (2002) Polyanionic stretch-deleted histone chaperone cia1/Asf1p is functional both in vivo and in vitro . Genes Cells 7: 59–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Stevenson JS, Liu H (2013) Nucleosome Assembly Factors CAF-1 and HIR Modulate Epigenetic Switching Frequencies in an H3K56 Acetylation-Associated Manner in Candida albicans . Eukaryot Cell 12: 591–603. 10.1128/EC.00334-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Stillman B (1986) Chromatin assembly during SV40 DNA replication in vitro . Cell 45: 555–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. De Backer MD, Ilyina T, Ma XJ, Vandoninck S, Luyten WH, et al. (2001) Genomic profiling of the response of Candida albicans to itraconazole treatment using a DNA microarray. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 1660–1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Miyazaki T, Miyazaki Y, Izumikawa K, Kakeya H, Miyakoshi S, et al. (2006) Fluconazole treatment is effective against a Candida albicans erg3/erg3 mutant in vivo despite in vitro resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 580–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Tscherner M, Schwarzmüller T, Kuchler K (2011) Pathogenesis and Antifungal Drug Resistance of the Human Fungal Pathogen Candida glabrata . Pharmaceuticals 4: 169–186. [Google Scholar]
76. Prasad R, Rawal MK (2014) Efflux pump proteins in antifungal resistance. Front Pharmacol 5: 202 10.3389/fphar.2014.00202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. Perea S, Lopez-Ribot JL, Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK, Santillan RA, et al. (2001) Prevalence of molecular mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance isolated from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 2676–2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Prasad R, De Wergifosse P, Goffeau A, Balzi E (1995) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene of Candida albicans, CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr Genet 27: 320–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Sanglard D, Ischer F, Monod M, Bille J (1997) Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 143 (Pt 2): 405–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80. Sanglard D, Kuchler K, Ischer F, Pagani JL, Monod M, et al. (1995) Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39: 2378–2386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Znaidi S, Barker KS, Weber S, Alarco AM, Liu TT, et al. (2009) Identification of the Candida albicans Cap1p regulon. Eukaryot Cell 8: 806–820. 10.1128/EC.00002-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. Kim HJ, Seol JH, Cho EJ (2009) Potential role of the histone chaperone, CAF-1, in transcription. BMB Rep 42: 227–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Ray-Gallet D, Woolfe A, Vassias I, Pellentz C, Lacoste N, et al. (2011) Dynamics of histone H3 deposition in vivo reveal a nucleosome gap-filling mechanism for H3.3 to maintain chromatin integrity. Mol Cell 44: 928–941. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Ejlassi-Lassallette A, Mocquard E, Arnaud MC, Thiriet C (2010) H4 replication-dependent diacetylation and Hat1 promote S-phase chromatin assembly in vivo . Mol Biol Cell 22: 245–255. 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Suter B, Pogoutse O, Guo X, Krogan N, Lewis P, et al. (2007) Association with the origin recognition complex suggests a novel role for histone acetyltransferase Hat1p/Hat2p. BMC Biol 5: 38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Lin LJ, Schultz MC (2011) Promoter regulation by distinct mechanisms of functional interplay between lysine acetylase Rtt109 and histone chaperone Asf1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 19599–19604. 10.1073/pnas.1111501108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Bambach A, Fernandes MP, Ghosh A, Kruppa M, Alex D, et al. (2009) Goa1p of Candida albicans localizes to the mitochondria during stress and is required for mitochondrial function and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 8: 1706–1720. 10.1128/EC.00066-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88. Thomas E, Roman E, Claypool S, Manzoor N, Pla J, et al. (2013) Mitochondria influence CDR1 efflux pump activity, Hog1-mediated oxidative stress pathway, iron homeostasis, and ergosterol levels in Candida albicans . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 5580–5599. 10.1128/AAC.00889-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89. Shingu-Vazquez M, Traven A (2011) Mitochondria and fungal pathogenesis: drug tolerance, virulence, and potential for antifungal therapy. Eukaryot Cell 10: 1376–1383. 10.1128/EC.05184-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4241–4257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. Chauhan N, Latge JP, Calderone R (2006) Signalling and oxidant adaptation in Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus . Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 435–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92. MacCallum DM, Castillo L, Brown AJ, Gow NA, Odds FC (2009) Early-expressed chemokines predict kidney immunopathology in experimental disseminated Candida albicans infections. PLoS One 4: e6420 10.1371/journal.pone.0006420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93. Sriskandan S, Altmann DM (2008) The immunology of sepsis. J Pathol 214: 211–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94. Zwolanek F, Riedelberger M, Stolz V, Jenull S, Istel F, et al. (2014) The non-receptor tyrosine kinase Tec controls assembly and activity of the noncanonical caspase-8 inflammasome. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004525 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Mantegazza AR, Savina A, Vermeulen M, Perez L, Geffner J, et al. (2008) NADPH oxidase controls phagosomal pH and antigen cross-presentation in human dendritic cells. Blood 112: 4712–4722. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Andaluz E, Ciudad T, Gomez-Raja J, Calderone R, Larriba G (2006) Rad52 depletion in Candida albicans triggers both the DNA-damage checkpoint and filamentation accompanied by but independent of expression of hypha-specific genes. Mol Microbiol 59: 1452–1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Lopes da Rosa J, Kaufman PD (2013) Chromatin-mediated Candida albicans virulence. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 349–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98. Lopez-Rubio JJ, Riviere L, Scherf A (2007) Shared epigenetic mechanisms control virulence factors in protozoan parasites. Curr Opin Microbiol 10: 560–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99. Hnisz D, Majer O, Frohner IE, Komnenovic V, Kuchler K (2010) The Set3/Hos2 histone deacetylase complex attenuates cAMP/PKA signaling to regulate morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans . PLoS Pathog 6: e1000889 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Simonetti G, Passariello C, Rotili D, Mai A, Garaci E, et al. (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors may reduce pathogenicity and virulence in Candida albicans . FEMS Yeast Res 7: 1371–1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101. Smith WL, Edlind TD (2002) Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance Candida albicans sensitivity to azoles and related antifungals: correlation with reduction in CDR and ERG upregulation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 3532–3539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102. Wurtele H, Tsao S, Lepine G, Mullick A, Tremblay J, et al. (2010) Modulation of histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation as an antifungal therapeutic strategy. Nat Med 16: 774–780. 10.1038/nm.2175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103. Kaiser C, Michaelis S, Mitchell A (1994) Methods in Yeast Genetics A Laboratory Course Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
104. Gillum AM, Tsay EY, Kirsch DR (1984) Isolation of the Candida albicans gene for orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase by complementation of S. cerevisiae ura3 and E. coli pyrF mutations. Mol Gen Genet 198: 179–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105. Gacser A, Salomon S, Schafer W (2005) Direct transformation of a clinical isolate of Candida parapsilosis using a dominant selection marker. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245: 117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106. Reuss O, Vik A, Kolter R, Morschhäuser J (2004) The SAT1 flipper, an optimized tool for gene disruption in Candida albicans . Gene 341: 119–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107. Krauke Y, Sychrova H (2011) Cnh1 Na(+) /H(+) antiporter and Ena1 Na(+) -ATPase play different roles in cation homeostasis and cell physiology of Candida glabrata . FEMS Yeast Res 11: 29–41. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00686.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108. Hill JE, Myers AM, Koerner TJ, Tzagoloff A (1986) Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2: 163–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109. Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, et al. (2001) A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 73: 56–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110. Zordan RE, Galgoczy DJ, Johnson AD (2006) Epigenetic properties of white-opaque switching in Candida albicans are based on a self-sustaining transcriptional feedback loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12807–12812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111. Sedlazeck FJ, Rescheneder P, von Haeseler A (2013) NextGenMap: fast and accurate read mapping in highly polymorphic genomes. Bioinformatics 29: 2790–2791. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W (2015) HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31: 166–169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113. Hnisz D, Bardet AF, Nobile CJ, Petryshyn A, Glaser W, et al. (2012) A histone deacetylase adjusts transcription kinetics at coding sequences during Candida albicans morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 8: e1003118 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 57: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
116.Oliveros JC (2007–2015) Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams.
117. Durchschlag E, Reiter W, Ammerer G, Schuller C (2004) Nuclear localization destabilizes the stress-regulated transcription factor Msn2. J Biol Chem 279: 55425–55432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118. Veal EA, Toone WM, Jones N, Morgan BA (2002) Distinct roles for glutathione S-transferases in the oxidative stress response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe . J Biol Chem 277: 35523–35531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119. Bourgeois C, Majer O, Frohner IE, Lesiak-Markowicz I, Hildering KS, et al. (2011) Conventional dendritic cells mount a type I IFN response against Candida spp. requiring novel phagosomal TLR7-mediated IFN-beta signaling. J Immunol 186: 3104–3112. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Loss of Hat1 causes oxidative stress resistance.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.4MB, tif)}

S2 Fig. Deletion of HAT1 causes upregulation of tRNAs and CAT1.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(246.4KB, tif)}

S3 Fig. Loss of Hat1 causes reduced ROS accumulation upon interaction with neutrophils.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(337.8KB, tif)}

S4 Fig. Reduced body weight loss upon infection with hat1Δ/Δ or cac2Δ/Δ cells.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(100.5KB, tif)}

S5 Fig. Deletion of RTT109 in S. cerevisiae increases H₂O₂ resistance.

Fivefold serial dilutions of the indicated strains were spotted on agar plates containing the indicated substances and pictures were taken after incubation at 30°C for 3 days.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(311.5KB, tif)}

S1 Table. RNA-Seq results.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(4.6MB, xlsx)}

S1 Text. Fungal strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study.

Table A. Fungal strains used in this study. Table B. Plasmids used in this study. Table C. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(81.5KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

Data have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE73409.

[ppat.1005218.ref001] 1. Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ (1997) Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389: 251–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref002] 2. Chen CC, Carson JJ, Feser J, Tamburini B, Zabaronick S, et al. (2008) Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134: 231–243. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref003] 3. Franco AA, Lam WM, Burgers PM, Kaufman PD (2005) Histone deposition protein Asf1 maintains DNA replisome integrity and interacts with replication factor C. Genes Dev 19: 1365–1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref004] 4. Kaplan CD, Laprade L, Winston F (2003) Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 301: 1096–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref005] 5. Saunders A, Werner J, Andrulis ED, Nakayama T, Hirose S, et al. (2003) Tracking FACT and the RNA polymerase II elongation complex through chromatin in vivo . Science 301: 1094–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref006] 6. Schwabish MA, Struhl K (2004) Evidence for eviction and rapid deposition of histones upon transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 24: 10111–10117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref007] 7. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA (2005) Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Nature 438: 379–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref008] 8. Parthun MR (2012) Histone acetyltransferase 1: More than just an enzyme? Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 256–263. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref009] 9. Parthun MR, Widom J, Gottschling DE (1996) The major cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase in yeast: links to chromatin replication and histone metabolism. Cell 87: 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref010] 10. Tscherner M, Stappler E, Hnisz D, Kuchler K (2012) The histone acetyltransferase Hat1 facilitates DNA damage repair and morphogenesis in Candida albicans . Mol Microbiol 86: 1197–1214. 10.1111/mmi.12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref011] 11. Parthun MR (2007) Hat1: the emerging cellular roles of a type B histone acetyltransferase. Oncogene 26: 5319–5328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref012] 12. Poveda A, Pamblanco M, Tafrov S, Tordera V, Sternglanz R, et al. (2004) Hif1 is a component of yeast histone acetyltransferase B, a complex mainly localized in the nucleus. J Biol Chem 279: 16033–16043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref013] 13. Driscoll R, Hudson A, Jackson SP (2007) Yeast Rtt109 promotes genome stability by acetylating histone H3 on lysine 56. Science 315: 649–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref014] 14. Kelly TJ, Qin S, Gottschling DE, Parthun MR (2000) Type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p participates in telomeric silencing. Mol Cell Biol 20: 7051–7058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref015] 15. Tong K, Keller T, Hoffman CS, Annunziato AT (2012) Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hat1 (Kat1) is associated with Mis16 and is required for telomeric silencing. Eukaryot Cell 11: 1095–1103. 10.1128/EC.00123-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref016] 16. Barman HK, Takami Y, Nishijima H, Shibahara K, Sanematsu F, et al. (2008) Histone acetyltransferase-1 regulates integrity of cytosolic histone H3–H4 containing complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 373: 624–630. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref017] 17. Campos EI, Fillingham J, Li G, Zheng H, Voigt P, et al. (2010) The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1343–1351. 10.1038/nsmb.1911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref018] 18. Yang X, Li L, Liang J, Shi L, Yang J, et al. (2013) Histone acetyltransferase 1 promotes homologous recombination in DNA repair by facilitating histone turnover. J Biol Chem 288: 18271–18282. 10.1074/jbc.M113.473199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref019] 19. Das C, Tyler JK, Churchill ME (2010) The histone shuffle: histone chaperones in an energetic dance. Trends Biochem Sci 35: 476–489. 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref020] 20. Huang S, Zhou H, Tarara J, Zhang Z (2007) A novel role for histone chaperones CAF-1 and Rtt106p in heterochromatin silencing. EMBO J 26: 2274–2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref021] 21. Shibahara K, Stillman B (1999) Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 96: 575–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref022] 22. Yu Z, Wu H, Chen H, Wang R, Liang X, et al. (2013) CAF-1 promotes Notch signaling through epigenetic control of target gene expression during Drosophila development. Development 140: 3635–3644. 10.1242/dev.094599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref023] 23. Spector MS, Raff A, DeSilva H, Lee K, Osley MA (1997) Hir1p and Hir2p function as transcriptional corepressors to regulate histone gene transcription in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 17: 545–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref024] 24. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ (2007) Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 20: 133–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref025] 25. Santos MA, Gomes AC, Santos MC, Carreto LC, Moura GR (2011) The genetic code of the fungal CTG clade. C R Biol 334: 607–611. 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref026] 26. Frohner IE, Bourgeois C, Yatsyk K, Majer O, Kuchler K (2009) Candida albicans cell surface superoxide dismutases degrade host-derived reactive oxygen species to escape innate immune surveillance. Mol Microbiol 71: 240–252. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06528.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref027] 27. Pfaller MA, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Diekema DJ, Espinel-Ingroff A, et al. (2011) Clinical breakpoints for voriconazole and Candida spp. revisited: review of microbiologic, molecular, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data as they pertain to the development of species-specific interpretive criteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 70: 330–343. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref028] 28. Chauhan N, Ciudad T, Rodriguez-Alejandre A, Larriba G, Calderone R, et al. (2005) Virulence and karyotype analyses of rad52 mutants of Candida albicans: regeneration of a truncated chromosome of a reintegrant strain (rad52/RAD52) in the host. Infect Immun 73: 8069–8078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref029] 29. Hao B, Clancy CJ, Cheng S, Raman SB, Iczkowski KA, et al. (2009) Candida albicans RFX2 encodes a DNA binding protein involved in DNA damage responses, morphogenesis, and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 8: 627–639. 10.1128/EC.00246-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref030] 30. Lopes da Rosa J, Boyartchuk VL, Zhu LJ, Kaufman PD (2010) Histone acetyltransferase Rtt109 is required for Candida albicans pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1594–1599. 10.1073/pnas.0912427107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref031] 31. Tierney L, Linde J, Muller S, Brunke S, Molina JC, et al. (2012) An Interspecies Regulatory Network Inferred from Simultaneous RNA-seq of Candida albicans Invading Innate Immune Cells. Front Microbiol 3: 85 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref032] 32. Fradin C, De Groot P, MacCallum D, Schaller M, Klis F, et al. (2005) Granulocytes govern the transcriptional response, morphology and proliferation of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol Microbiol 56: 397–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref033] 33. Klopf E, Paskova L, Sole C, Mas G, Petryshyn A, et al. (2009) Cooperation between the INO80 complex and histone chaperones determines adaptation of stress gene transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Cell Biol 29: 4994–5007. 10.1128/MCB.01858-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref034] 34. Adkins MW, Howar SR, Tyler JK (2004) Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. Mol Cell 14: 657–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref035] 35. Adkins MW, Tyler JK (2006) Transcriptional activators are dispensable for transcription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions. Mol Cell 21: 405–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref036] 36. Shivaswamy S, Iyer VR (2008) Stress-dependent dynamics of global chromatin remodeling in yeast: dual role for SWI/SNF in the heat shock stress response. Mol Cell Biol 28: 2221–2234. 10.1128/MCB.01659-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref037] 37. Zabaronick SR, Tyler JK (2005) The histone chaperone anti-silencing function 1 is a global regulator of transcription independent of passage through S phase. Mol Cell Biol 25: 652–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref038] 38. Zunder RM, Rine J (2012) Direct interplay among histones, histone chaperones, and a chromatin boundary protein in the control of histone gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 32: 4337–4349. 10.1128/MCB.00871-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref039] 39. Kristjuhan A, Svejstrup JQ (2004) Evidence for distinct mechanisms facilitating transcript elongation through chromatin in vivo . EMBO J 23: 4243–4252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref040] 40. Mellor J (2006) Dynamic nucleosomes and gene transcription. Trends Genet 22: 320–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref041] 41. Ge Z, Wang H, Parthun MR (2011) Nuclear Hat1p complex (NuB4) components participate in DNA repair-linked chromatin reassembly. J Biol Chem 286: 16790–16799. 10.1074/jbc.M110.216846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref042] 42. Mersfelder EL, Parthun MR (2008) Involvement of Hat1p (Kat1p) catalytic activity and subcellular localization in telomeric silencing. J Biol Chem 283: 29060–29068. 10.1074/jbc.M802564200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref043] 43. Qin S, Parthun MR (2006) Recruitment of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p to chromatin is linked to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3649–3658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref044] 44. Green EM, Antczak AJ, Bailey AO, Franco AA, Wu KJ, et al. (2005) Replication-independent histone deposition by the HIR complex and Asf1. Curr Biol 15: 2044–2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref045] 45. Huang S, Zhou H, Katzmann D, Hochstrasser M, Atanasova E, et al. (2005) Rtt106p is a histone chaperone involved in heterochromatin-mediated silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 13410–13415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref046] 46. Marheineke K, Krude T (1998) Nucleosome assembly activity and intracellular localization of human CAF-1 changes during the cell division cycle. J Biol Chem 273: 15279–15286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref047] 47. Verreault A, Kaufman PD, Kobayashi R, Stillman B (1996) Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 87: 95–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref048] 48. Zhang H, Han J, Kang B, Burgess R, Zhang Z (2012) Human histone acetyltransferase 1 protein preferentially acetylates H4 histone molecules in H3.1-H4 over H3.3-H4. J Biol Chem 287: 6573–6581. 10.1074/jbc.M111.312637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref049] 49. Silva AC, Xu X, Kim HS, Fillingham J, Kislinger T, et al. (2012) The replication-independent histone H3–H4 chaperones HIR, ASF1, and RTT106 co-operate to maintain promoter fidelity. J Biol Chem 287: 1709–1718. 10.1074/jbc.M111.316489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref050] 50. Nair DM, Ge Z, Mersfelder EL, Parthun MR (2011) Genetic interactions between POB3 and the acetylation of newly synthesized histones. Curr Genet 57: 271–286. 10.1007/s00294-011-0347-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref051] 51. Buurman ET, Jiang W, McCoy M, Averett DR, Thompson CM, et al. (2002) Validation of Cdc68p as a novel antifungal target. Arch Microbiol 178: 428–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref052] 52. Davis DA, Bruno VM, Loza L, Filler SG, Mitchell AP (2002) Candida albicans Mds3p, a conserved regulator of pH responses and virulence identified through insertional mutagenesis. Genetics 162: 1573–1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref053] 53. Al-Rawi N, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM (2010) Deletion of Candida albicans SPT6 is not lethal but results in defective hyphal growth. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 288–296. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref054] 54. Wysong DR, Christin L, Sugar AM, Robbins PW, Diamond RD (1998) Cloning and sequencing of a Candida albicans catalase gene and effects of disruption of this gene. Infect Immun 66: 1953–1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref055] 55. Lamarre C, LeMay JD, Deslauriers N, Bourbonnais Y (2001) Candida albicans expresses an unusual cytoplasmic manganese-containing superoxide dismutase (SOD3 gene product) upon the entry and during the stationary phase. J Biol Chem 276: 43784–43791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref056] 56. Ma LH, Takanishi CL, Wood MJ (2007) Molecular mechanism of oxidative stress perception by the Orp1 protein. J Biol Chem 282: 31429–31436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref057] 57. Ardehali MB, Yao J, Adelman K, Fuda NJ, Petesch SJ, et al. (2009) Spt6 enhances the elongation rate of RNA polymerase II in vivo . EMBO J 28: 1067–1077. 10.1038/emboj.2009.56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref058] 58. Baek YU, Kim YR, Yim HS, Kang SO (2004) Disruption of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase results in absolute glutathione auxotrophy and apoptosis in Candida albicans . FEBS Lett 556: 47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref059] 59. Shahana S, Childers DS, Ballou ER, Bohovych I, Odds FC, et al. (2014) New Clox Systems for rapid and efficient gene disruption in Candida albicans . PLoS One 9: e100390 10.1371/journal.pone.0100390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref060] 60. Hwang CS, Oh JH, Huh WK, Yim HS, Kang SO (2003) Ssn6, an important factor of morphological conversion and virulence in Candida albicans . Mol Microbiol 47: 1029–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref061] 61. Chang P, Fan X, Chen J (2015) Function and subcellular localization of Gcn5, a histone acetyltransferase in Candida albicans . Fungal Genet Biol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref062] 62. Lee JE, Oh JH, Ku M, Kim J, Lee JS, et al. (2015) Ssn6 has dual roles in Candida albicans filament development through the interaction with Rpd31. FEBS Lett 589: 513–520. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref063] 63. Murad AM, Leng P, Straffon M, Wishart J, Macaskill S, et al. (2001) NRG1 represses yeast-hypha morphogenesis and hypha-specific gene expression in Candida albicans . EMBO J 20: 4742–4752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref064] 64. Lionakis MS, Lim JK, Lee CC, Murphy PM (2011) Organ-specific innate immune responses in a mouse model of invasive candidiasis. J Innate Immun 3: 180–199. 10.1159/000321157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref065] 65. Majer O, Bourgeois C, Zwolanek F, Lassnig C, Kerjaschki D, et al. (2012) Type I interferons promote fatal immunopathology by regulating inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils during Candida infections . PLoS Pathog 8: e1002811 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref066] 66. Benson LJ, Phillips JA, Gu Y, Parthun MR, Hoffman CS, et al. (2007) Properties of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1: H4 tail interaction, site preference, and involvement in DNA repair. J Biol Chem 282: 836–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref067] 67. Barman HK, Takami Y, Ono T, Nishijima H, Sanematsu F, et al. (2006) Histone acetyltransferase 1 is dispensable for replication-coupled chromatin assembly but contributes to recover DNA damages created following replication blockage in vertebrate cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345: 1547–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref068] 68. Fillingham J, Recht J, Silva AC, Suter B, Emili A, et al. (2008) Chaperone control of the activity and specificity of the histone H3 acetyltransferase Rtt109. Mol Cell Biol 28: 4342–4353. 10.1128/MCB.00182-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref069] 69. Schulz LL, Tyler JK (2006) The histone chaperone ASF1 localizes to active DNA replication forks to mediate efficient DNA replication. FASEB J 20: 488–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref070] 70. Umehara T, Chimura T, Ichikawa N, Horikoshi M (2002) Polyanionic stretch-deleted histone chaperone cia1/Asf1p is functional both in vivo and in vitro . Genes Cells 7: 59–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref071] 71. Stevenson JS, Liu H (2013) Nucleosome Assembly Factors CAF-1 and HIR Modulate Epigenetic Switching Frequencies in an H3K56 Acetylation-Associated Manner in Candida albicans . Eukaryot Cell 12: 591–603. 10.1128/EC.00334-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref072] 72. Stillman B (1986) Chromatin assembly during SV40 DNA replication in vitro . Cell 45: 555–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref073] 73. De Backer MD, Ilyina T, Ma XJ, Vandoninck S, Luyten WH, et al. (2001) Genomic profiling of the response of Candida albicans to itraconazole treatment using a DNA microarray. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 1660–1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref074] 74. Miyazaki T, Miyazaki Y, Izumikawa K, Kakeya H, Miyakoshi S, et al. (2006) Fluconazole treatment is effective against a Candida albicans erg3/erg3 mutant in vivo despite in vitro resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 580–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref075] 75. Tscherner M, Schwarzmüller T, Kuchler K (2011) Pathogenesis and Antifungal Drug Resistance of the Human Fungal Pathogen Candida glabrata . Pharmaceuticals 4: 169–186. [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref076] 76. Prasad R, Rawal MK (2014) Efflux pump proteins in antifungal resistance. Front Pharmacol 5: 202 10.3389/fphar.2014.00202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref077] 77. Perea S, Lopez-Ribot JL, Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK, Santillan RA, et al. (2001) Prevalence of molecular mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance isolated from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45: 2676–2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref078] 78. Prasad R, De Wergifosse P, Goffeau A, Balzi E (1995) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene of Candida albicans, CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr Genet 27: 320–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref079] 79. Sanglard D, Ischer F, Monod M, Bille J (1997) Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 143 (Pt 2): 405–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref080] 80. Sanglard D, Kuchler K, Ischer F, Pagani JL, Monod M, et al. (1995) Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39: 2378–2386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref081] 81. Znaidi S, Barker KS, Weber S, Alarco AM, Liu TT, et al. (2009) Identification of the Candida albicans Cap1p regulon. Eukaryot Cell 8: 806–820. 10.1128/EC.00002-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref082] 82. Kim HJ, Seol JH, Cho EJ (2009) Potential role of the histone chaperone, CAF-1, in transcription. BMB Rep 42: 227–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref083] 83. Ray-Gallet D, Woolfe A, Vassias I, Pellentz C, Lacoste N, et al. (2011) Dynamics of histone H3 deposition in vivo reveal a nucleosome gap-filling mechanism for H3.3 to maintain chromatin integrity. Mol Cell 44: 928–941. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref084] 84. Ejlassi-Lassallette A, Mocquard E, Arnaud MC, Thiriet C (2010) H4 replication-dependent diacetylation and Hat1 promote S-phase chromatin assembly in vivo . Mol Biol Cell 22: 245–255. 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref085] 85. Suter B, Pogoutse O, Guo X, Krogan N, Lewis P, et al. (2007) Association with the origin recognition complex suggests a novel role for histone acetyltransferase Hat1p/Hat2p. BMC Biol 5: 38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref086] 86. Lin LJ, Schultz MC (2011) Promoter regulation by distinct mechanisms of functional interplay between lysine acetylase Rtt109 and histone chaperone Asf1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 19599–19604. 10.1073/pnas.1111501108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref087] 87. Bambach A, Fernandes MP, Ghosh A, Kruppa M, Alex D, et al. (2009) Goa1p of Candida albicans localizes to the mitochondria during stress and is required for mitochondrial function and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 8: 1706–1720. 10.1128/EC.00066-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref088] 88. Thomas E, Roman E, Claypool S, Manzoor N, Pla J, et al. (2013) Mitochondria influence CDR1 efflux pump activity, Hog1-mediated oxidative stress pathway, iron homeostasis, and ergosterol levels in Candida albicans . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 5580–5599. 10.1128/AAC.00889-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref089] 89. Shingu-Vazquez M, Traven A (2011) Mitochondria and fungal pathogenesis: drug tolerance, virulence, and potential for antifungal therapy. Eukaryot Cell 10: 1376–1383. 10.1128/EC.05184-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref090] 90. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4241–4257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref091] 91. Chauhan N, Latge JP, Calderone R (2006) Signalling and oxidant adaptation in Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus . Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 435–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref092] 92. MacCallum DM, Castillo L, Brown AJ, Gow NA, Odds FC (2009) Early-expressed chemokines predict kidney immunopathology in experimental disseminated Candida albicans infections. PLoS One 4: e6420 10.1371/journal.pone.0006420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref093] 93. Sriskandan S, Altmann DM (2008) The immunology of sepsis. J Pathol 214: 211–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref094] 94. Zwolanek F, Riedelberger M, Stolz V, Jenull S, Istel F, et al. (2014) The non-receptor tyrosine kinase Tec controls assembly and activity of the noncanonical caspase-8 inflammasome. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004525 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref095] 95. Mantegazza AR, Savina A, Vermeulen M, Perez L, Geffner J, et al. (2008) NADPH oxidase controls phagosomal pH and antigen cross-presentation in human dendritic cells. Blood 112: 4712–4722. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref096] 96. Andaluz E, Ciudad T, Gomez-Raja J, Calderone R, Larriba G (2006) Rad52 depletion in Candida albicans triggers both the DNA-damage checkpoint and filamentation accompanied by but independent of expression of hypha-specific genes. Mol Microbiol 59: 1452–1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref097] 97. Lopes da Rosa J, Kaufman PD (2013) Chromatin-mediated Candida albicans virulence. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 349–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref098] 98. Lopez-Rubio JJ, Riviere L, Scherf A (2007) Shared epigenetic mechanisms control virulence factors in protozoan parasites. Curr Opin Microbiol 10: 560–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref099] 99. Hnisz D, Majer O, Frohner IE, Komnenovic V, Kuchler K (2010) The Set3/Hos2 histone deacetylase complex attenuates cAMP/PKA signaling to regulate morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans . PLoS Pathog 6: e1000889 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref100] 100. Simonetti G, Passariello C, Rotili D, Mai A, Garaci E, et al. (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors may reduce pathogenicity and virulence in Candida albicans . FEMS Yeast Res 7: 1371–1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref101] 101. Smith WL, Edlind TD (2002) Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance Candida albicans sensitivity to azoles and related antifungals: correlation with reduction in CDR and ERG upregulation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 3532–3539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref102] 102. Wurtele H, Tsao S, Lepine G, Mullick A, Tremblay J, et al. (2010) Modulation of histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation as an antifungal therapeutic strategy. Nat Med 16: 774–780. 10.1038/nm.2175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref103] 103. Kaiser C, Michaelis S, Mitchell A (1994) Methods in Yeast Genetics A Laboratory Course Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref104] 104. Gillum AM, Tsay EY, Kirsch DR (1984) Isolation of the Candida albicans gene for orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase by complementation of S. cerevisiae ura3 and E. coli pyrF mutations. Mol Gen Genet 198: 179–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref105] 105. Gacser A, Salomon S, Schafer W (2005) Direct transformation of a clinical isolate of Candida parapsilosis using a dominant selection marker. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245: 117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref106] 106. Reuss O, Vik A, Kolter R, Morschhäuser J (2004) The SAT1 flipper, an optimized tool for gene disruption in Candida albicans . Gene 341: 119–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref107] 107. Krauke Y, Sychrova H (2011) Cnh1 Na(+) /H(+) antiporter and Ena1 Na(+) -ATPase play different roles in cation homeostasis and cell physiology of Candida glabrata . FEMS Yeast Res 11: 29–41. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00686.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref108] 108. Hill JE, Myers AM, Koerner TJ, Tzagoloff A (1986) Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2: 163–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref109] 109. Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, et al. (2001) A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 73: 56–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref110] 110. Zordan RE, Galgoczy DJ, Johnson AD (2006) Epigenetic properties of white-opaque switching in Candida albicans are based on a self-sustaining transcriptional feedback loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12807–12812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref111] 111. Sedlazeck FJ, Rescheneder P, von Haeseler A (2013) NextGenMap: fast and accurate read mapping in highly polymorphic genomes. Bioinformatics 29: 2790–2791. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref112] 112. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W (2015) HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31: 166–169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref113] 113. Hnisz D, Bardet AF, Nobile CJ, Petryshyn A, Glaser W, et al. (2012) A histone deacetylase adjusts transcription kinetics at coding sequences during Candida albicans morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 8: e1003118 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref114] 114. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref115] 115. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 57: 289–300. [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref116] 116.Oliveros JC (2007–2015) Venny. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams.

[ppat.1005218.ref117] 117. Durchschlag E, Reiter W, Ammerer G, Schuller C (2004) Nuclear localization destabilizes the stress-regulated transcription factor Msn2. J Biol Chem 279: 55425–55432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref118] 118. Veal EA, Toone WM, Jones N, Morgan BA (2002) Distinct roles for glutathione S-transferases in the oxidative stress response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe . J Biol Chem 277: 35523–35531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[ppat.1005218.ref119] 119. Bourgeois C, Majer O, Frohner IE, Lesiak-Markowicz I, Hildering KS, et al. (2011) Conventional dendritic cells mount a type I IFN response against Candida spp. requiring novel phagosomal TLR7-mediated IFN-beta signaling. J Immunol 186: 3104–3112. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

The Candida albicans Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1 Regulates Stress Resistance and Virulence via Distinct Chromatin Assembly Pathways

Michael Tscherner

Florian Zwolanek

Sabrina Jenull

Fritz J Sedlazeck

Andriy Petryshyn

Ingrid E Frohner

John Mavrianos

Neeraj Chauhan

Arndt von Haeseler

Karl Kuchler

Roles

Abstract

Author Summary

Introduction

Results

Deletion of NuB4 components increases H2O2 resistance and azole tolerance

Fig 1. Deletion of HAT1 and HAT2 increases oxidative stress resistance and azole tolerance.

Inactivation of chromatin assembly pathways mimics lack of Hat1

Table 1. Selected histone chaperone genes for deletion in C. albicans.

Fig 2. Lack of histone chaperones mimics deletion of HAT1.

Oxidative stress resistance upon loss of Hat1 is restricted to CTG clade species

Fig 3. Resistance phenotypes caused by loss of Hat1 are specific for C. albicans.

Loss of Hat1 primarily affects transcriptional repression

Fig 4. Deletion of HAT1 primarily leads to upregulation of genes.

Lack of Hat1 affects specific functional gene groups

Fig 5. Specific functional gene groups are upregulated in cells lacking Hat1.

Deletion of HAT1 accelerates induction of oxidative stress genes

Fig 6. Lack of Hat1 accelerates induction of oxidative stress genes.

Fig 7. Loss of Hat1 raises antioxidant enzyme activity and glutathione-mediated H2O2 resistance.

Hat1 regulates ROS detoxification and neutrophil survival

Fig 8. Higher ROS detoxification capacity of hat1Δ/Δ cells causes resistance to neutrophil killing.

Cells lacking Hat1 show reduced virulence but persist in mouse kidneys

Fig 9. Cells lacking Hat1 show reduced virulence but persist in mouse kidneys.

Discussion

Regulation of oxidative stress genes via chromatin assembly

Repression of genes via distinct chromatin assembly pathways

Inactivation of Hat1 compromises virulence in C. albicans

Evolution of specialized functions for chromatin assembly pathways in C. albicans

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Media, chemicals and growth conditions

Plasmid and strain construction and genomic verification

Spot dilution and liquid survival/growth inhibition assays

RNA isolation, RT-qPCR analysis and RNA-seq

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

Enzymatic assays, immunoblotting and mass spectrometric analysis

Mouse strains and immune cells (bone marrow-derived macrophages and neutrophils)

ROS and phagocytosis assays

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

Deletion of NuB4 components increases H₂O₂ resistance and azole tolerance

Fig 7. Loss of Hat1 raises antioxidant enzyme activity and glutathione-mediated H₂O₂ resistance.