Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2015 Oct 14;3(10):apps.1500059. doi: 10.3732/apps.1500059

Characterization of 12 polymorphic SSR markers in Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae (Plantaginaceae) and cross-amplification in 10 other subgenera1

Noemí López-González 2,3,5, Eike Mayland-Quellhorst 4, Daniel Pinto-Carrasco 2,3, M Montserrat Martínez-Ortega 2,3
PMCID: PMC4610313  PMID: 26504682

Abstract

Premise of the study:

Microsatellite primers were developed in the perennial herbs of the diploid-polyploid complex Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae (Plantaginaceae) to investigate the role that hybridization has played in the evolution of the group, which includes several endangered species.

Methods and Results:

Twelve pairs of primers leading to polymorphic and readable markers were identified and optimized from V. jacquinii and V. orbiculata using a microsatellite-enriched library method and 454 GS-FLX technique. The set of primers amplified dinucleotide to pentanucleotide repeats, and the number of alleles per locus ranged from one to six, one to 11, and one to nine for V. orsiniana, V. javalambrensis, and V. rosea, respectively. Transferability analyses were performed in 20 species corresponding to 10 different subgenera.

Conclusions:

These results indicate the utility of the newly developed microsatellites across Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae, which will help in the study of gene flow patterns and genetic structure.

Keywords: conservation, hybridization, Plantaginaceae, polyploid complex, Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae


The genus Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) comprises ca. 450 species, which are grouped into 12 subgenera with between two and 180 species each (Albach et al., 2004; Garnock-Jones et al., 2007). It includes some perennials of relative economic importance in ornamental horticulture and others that are well-known widespread weeds. Additionally, several species of Veronica are registered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List (http://www.iucnredlist.org/) and other regional catalogs of endangered plants (e.g., Peñas de Giles et al., 2004), or are threatened plants with narrow distribution areas (e.g., Petrova and Vladimirov, 2009).

Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae Benth. is a monophyletic diploid-polyploid complex and one of the four subsections currently recognized within the also monophyletic Veronica subgen. Pentasepalae M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fischer (Albach et al., 2008). This subsection comprises ca. 20 perennial taxa and is represented in the temperate regions of Eurasia with one species in North Africa. The complex seems to be of recent origin and divergence, as many diploid representatives are still extant and short branches are found in the phylogenetic analyses based on ITS and plastid DNA sequence data (Rojas-Andrés et al., 2015). Although the diploid species are characterized by subtle morphological differences, each has been recovered as monophyletic in previous studies. Hybridization and polyploidization are widespread in the group, and several authors (Lehmann, 1937; Scheerer, 1949; Rojas-Andrés et al., 2015) have concluded that gene flow and complex relationships among polyploids and their diploid relatives might exist. Interestingly, some of the diploid and polyploid species belonging to Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae are Mediterranean orophytes that face a high risk of extinction with climate warming and/or grow in Important Plant Areas (IPAs; IPA online database: http://www.plantlifeipa.org/reports.asp), regions that display exceptionally rich floras of biogeographic interest (Rojas-Andrés et al., 2015). Given that current gene flow and introgression may have blurred species limits, particularly in hybrid zones, accurate investigations of gene flow patterns within and among Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae populations are necessary for conservation and species delimitation purposes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Microsatellite development

For the microsatellite library, silica gel–dried leaves of 12 diploid individuals of V. jacquinii Baumg. and V. orbiculata A. Kern. were selected from eight different populations (Appendix 1). Ploidy level was checked using flow cytometry. A microsatellite library was prepared by Genoscreen (Lille, France) using a 454 GS-FLX (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) high-throughput DNA sequencer (Malausa et al., 2011). Genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method described in Doyle and Doyle (1987). The DNA was fragmented and enriched with TG, TC, AAC, AAG, AGG, ACG, ACAT, and ACTC motifs. A total of 32,052 high-quality sequences were obtained. Analyses of these sequences with QDD software (Meglécz et al., 2010) revealed 3010 sequences with microsatellite motifs, for which 195 pairs of primers were obtained. Given that it is too time consuming and not affordable to check all of the primer pairs obtained, 54 of them with low primer pair penalty and different lengths and repeat motifs were selected. These primers were ordered (Eurofins, Ebersberg, Germany) to evaluate polymorphic loci on 12 individuals from the complex V. jacquinii–V. orbiculata. PCRs were performed in a total volume of 15 μL, which contained 1× PCR Green GoTaq Buffer (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), 0.25 mM of each dNTP (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA), 0.33 mM of each primer, 0.5 units GoTaq DNA Polymerase (Promega Corporation), and 18.2 ng of DNA template. PCRs used the following conditions: an initial step at 94°C for 2 min; followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 50–58°C, and 50 s at 72°C; and a final extension of 15 min at 72°C. All the reactions were conducted on a Mastercycler pro S thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2.5% agarose gel and sent to Macrogen Europe sequencing service (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

In a second step, those primers that were polymorphic in the V. jacquinii–V. orbiculata complex were tested in two individuals from three species, each from a different clade (V. orsiniana Ten. [core clade], V. javalambrensis Pau [Iberian clade], and V. rosea Desf. [North African clade]), using the same PCR conditions. Twelve polymorphic primer pairs were selected (see Appendix 2 for additional primers). Following the procedure developed by Schuelke (2000), the sequence-specific forward primers were marked at the 5′ end with an M13 tail (5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) (Eurofins), which was then labeled with 5-FAM, VIC, NED, or PET fluorescent dyes (Table 1) (Life Technologies). The PCR mix contained 1× PCR Green GoTaq (Promega Corporation), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.16 mM of each reverse and fluorescent-labeled M13 primer, 0.04 mM of forward primer, 0.75 units GoTaq DNA Polymerase, and 50 ng of DNA template in a total volume of 15 μL. Conditions of the PCR amplification were as described above, adding 10 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 53°C, and 50 s at 72°C before the final extension. PCR products were analyzed with GeneMarker AFLP/Genotyping Software version 1.8 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA).

Table 1.

Characterization of 12 polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci isolated from Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae.a

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Fluorescent dye Repeat motif Allele size range (bp)b Ta (°C) GenBank accession no.
8 F: TGATGTGACTGATTGGGTCAG 5-FAM (TGA)5 92–95 55 KR698358
R: TTACCTCCTCATCACTCCCC
10 F: TGAACAACACACAGGTTCAATTC 5-FAM (AG)9 113–119 55 KR698359
R: GGCTAGAAGTTGTGAAGAAGGG
13 F: GCTTTTCTCGGTGAAAGGGT PET (TGAT)5 113–133 58 KR698360
R: CACCATAATCCACAGCCTGA
19 F: TCGAAACTTATTCGGCAACG 5-FAM (ATT)5 133–157 55 KR698361
R: GACTCACGAGTTTGGAAGCG
20 F: TGGAGACCAAAATTCAACCC PET (AC)11 93–135 52 KR698362
R: TCTTGTCTCCTACTCTCCTCCG
26 F: ATGTCGACGTGTCAACTCCA NED (CAA)6 87–102 56 KR698363
R: CACTTGTTTCCACAGCTGGC
27 F: TATGGGAGACGACATGGTCA PET (TTGTG)6 201–221 55 KR698364
R: CTCCCTTTCGTAGCAACACC
35 F: CATTTAATGGTATCCGATGCG NED (TATC)7 106–130 52 KR698365
R: TCGCTTTTCGATTTCTTCGT
49 F: GGATGCTTTATTTTGTCTTGT VIC (TGGA)5 222–242 52 KR698366
R: TGTTACGACATTTATGGTGATT
50 F: TGTGATGCACAGAGTTTTAGTT VIC (AGA)6 400–460 50 KR698367
R: TGAAAACATAACACCTCGATAA
52 F: ATAAAAACATCCATACTTTCCG VIC (GTT)5 358–391 52 KR698368
R: GTTAACCGCCAGTCTAACTAAT
54 F: CCAAATATCAAATGATACCACA NED (AC)13 283–301 52 KR698369
R: TCGTAAAATTACGTCATCAAGA

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

a

All values are based on 90 samples from three Veronica populations.

b

Range of fragment sizes does not include the M13 tail (5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) attached to the forward primer.

Population genetics parameters in three further species from Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae

The first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae based on DNA sequence data revealed four main clades each corresponding to a broad geographic area (Rojas-Andrés et al., 2015). Thus, for the characterization of the microsatellite markers, diploid populations corresponding to species from different clades were selected (Appendix 1): V. orsiniana (core clade), V. javalambrensis (Iberian clade), and V. rosea (North African clade). The Central Asian clade was not considered because no material was available. The mean number of alleles per locus, observed and expected heterozygosities, possible deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE; Table 2), and tests for linkage disequilibrium between markers in each population were estimated using Arlequin version 3.5.1.2 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010).

Table 2.

Results of initial primer screening of polymorphic loci in three populations corresponding to three different taxa belonging to Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae.a

V. orsiniana (n = 30) V. javalambrensis (n = 30) V. rosea (n = 30)
Locus A Ho He HWEb A Ho He HWEb A Ho He HWEb
8 2 0.933 0.506 0.000*** 2 0.167 0.155 1.000 ns 1
10 2 0.000 0.066 0.017* 1 3 0.033 0.097 0.017*
13 2 0.167 0.440 0.001*** 6 0.500 0.500 0.388 ns 1
19 2 0.333 0.488 0.125 ns 4 0.700 0.697 0.852 ns 4 0.233 0.298 0.968 ns
20 4 0.700 0.525 0.140 ns 10 0.767 0.818 0.077 ns 9 0.690 0.736 0.144 ns
26 1 3 0.433 0.432 1.000 ns 5 0.690 0.743 0.391 ns
27 3 0.500 0.560 0.290 ns 3 0.483 0.381 0.448 ns 3 0.233 0.213 1.000 ns
35 2 0.400 0.488 0.447 ns 3 0.333 0.420 0.100 ns 4 0.769 0.669 0.860 ns
49 1 6 0.633 0.742 0.061 ns
50 3 0.233 0.216 1.000 ns 11 0.567 0.785 0.017* 4 0.037 0.240 0.000***
52 1 1 3 0.136 0.210 0.222 ns
54 6 0.567 0.733 0.000*** 3 0.367 0.310 0.632 ns 4 0.600 0.494 0.399 ns

Note: — = not amplified; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium probabilities; n = number of individuals sampled.

a

See Appendix 1 for locality and voucher information for each population.

b

Deviations from HWE were not statistically significant (ns) and statistically significant at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P ≤ 0.001.

The number of alleles per locus ranged from one to six, one to 11, and one to nine in the V. orsiniana, V. javalambrensis, and V. rosea populations, respectively. Loci 26, 49, and 52 were monomorphic in V. orsiniana, loci 10 and 52 were monomorphic in V. javalambrensis, and in V. rosea, loci 8 and 13 were monomorphic and locus 49 did not amplify. The observed and expected heterozygosities for all populations are shown in Table 2. Significant deviation from HWE (P < 0.05) was seen for loci 8, 10, 13, and 54 in V. orsiniana, for locus 50 in V. javalambrensis, and for loci 10 and 50 in V. rosea. Linkage disequilibrium showed significance levels below 0.05 after false discovery rate (FDR) correction in two pairwise comparisons (pair 20–52 in V. rosea and pair 27–54 in V. orsiniana).

Cross-amplification in other species from Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae and 10 subgenera of Veronica

Cross-amplification performed for these 12 polymorphic loci showed successful results within the expected allele size in two additional species from Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae: V. austriaca L. and V. dentata F. W. Schmidt. Tests were also performed for 20 additional species from 10 different subgenera within the large genus Veronica (Table 3). The tests were carried out with the original PCR protocol. The 12 loci tested in agarose gel showed successful amplification of at least several bands. Six of these (8, 10, 13, 19, 26, and 35) showed good amplification results in most samples.

Table 3.

Amplification success of all microsatellite primers across 20 species from 10 subgenera of Veronica.

Subgenera Collector no.a,b Species 8 10 13 19 20 26 27 35 49 50 52 54
Veronica subg. Beccabunga (Hill) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. DCA350 V. gentianoides w s + w +
Veronica subg. Beccabunga DCA297 V. gentianoides s s + w s +
Veronica subg. Beccabunga MO1598 V. gentianoides +
Veronica subg. Chamaedrys (W. D. J. Koch) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. KBch67 V. chamaedrys subsp. chamaedryoides s s w + + + w + s
Veronica subg. Chamaedrys KBch54 V. vindobonensis s + w + + s + + s
Veronica subg. Cochlidiosperma (Rchb.) M. M. Mart. Ort. & Albach DCA403 V. cymbalaria + + + s w s s + s
Veronica subg. Cochlidiosperma HMM31 V. cymbalaria + + + + w s s +
Veronica subg. Cochlidiosperma HMM32 V. cymbalaria + + + + w s s +
Veronica subg. Cochlidiosperma HMM29 V. panormitana + s + + s +
Veronica subg. Cochlidiosperma HMM30 V. trichadena + s + s + w
Veronica subg. Pellidosperma (E. B. J. Lehm.) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. DCAs434 V. triphyllos + + + w s s w s + w
Veronica subg. Pocilla (Dumort.) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. DCA144 V. filiformis w + + s w s w +
Veronica subg. Pocilla DCA954 V. filiformis s + + s w s + + v s
Veronica subg. Pocilla DCA892 V. filiformis s + + s w + + + s
Veronica subg. Pseudolysimachium (W. D. J. Koch) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. KB847 V. orchidea s + w s + s + + s
Veronica subg. Pseudolysimachium KBps54 V. orchidea + s + + + + w
Veronica subg. Pseudolysimachium KBps57 V. orchidea w s + w + + w
Veronica subg. Pseudolysimachium BF11726 V. incana w s + w + +
Veronica subg. Pseudoveronica J. B. Armstr. PGJ2878 V. speciosa s s + s + s s s
Veronica subg. Pseudoveronica HMM69 V. salicornioides s s + s + s s s
Veronica subg. Pseudoveronica HMM38 V. hectori subsp. coarctata w s + s + s s w s s
Veronica subg. Pseudoveronica HMM39 V. ochracea s s + s + s s s s s
Veronica subg. Pseudoveronica HMM40 V. planopetiolata s + + s + s s s s s
Veronica subg. Pseudoveronica HMM37 V. catarractae s s w s + s s + s s
Veronica subg. Stenocarpon (Boriss.) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. LS1408 V. fruticans s s s + s s + s w + +
Veronica subg. Stenocarpon DCA71 V. fruticulosa s + + + s s + s + + +
Veronica subg. Synthyris (Benth.) M. M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M. A. Fisch. DCA124 V. missurica w + w + + + + s + w
Veronica subg. Veronica DCA114 V. officinalis w w s w w + w w + w

Note: + = successful amplification; — = no amplification; s = several bands; w = weak amplification.

a

Abbreviations (collector numbers): BF = Bozo Frajman; DCA = Dirk C. Albach; HMM = Heidi M. Meudt; KB = Katharina E. Bardy; LS = Lena Struwe; PGJ = Phil Garnock-Jones.

b

DNA samples are deposited at Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (Germany).

CONCLUSIONS

A set of polymorphic microsatellite markers for Veronica subsect. Pentasepalae is reported. Amplification success for these markers in the cross-transferability tests extends their potential usefulness to other subgenera. These markers will be useful for investigating genetic parameters, which may provide essential information for the conservation of threatened species, as well as data on the role of interspecific hybridization in the evolution of the genus.

Appendix 1.

Voucher information for the Veronica samples used in this study.

Species Collector no. (Herbarium code)a,b Collection country and locality Geographic coordinates
V. austriaca L. (n = 15) BR94 (SALA) Croatia. Gračac, Crnopac 44°15′02.2″N, 15°48′35.5″E
V. catarractae G. Forst. (n = 1) HMM37 (OLD) cult. Germany ex UK nursery “Botany Plants” stock. Botanical Garden, Oldenburg NA
V. chamaedrys L. subsp. chamaedryoides (Bory & Chaub.) M. A. Fisch. (n = 1) KBch67 (WU) Greece. Olympia 37°51′47.0″N, 21°48′45.0″E
V. cymbalaria Bodard (n = 1) DCA403 (WU) Greece. Vourakis NA
V. cymbalaria (n = 1) HMM31 (OLD) Turkey. Alanya Castle 36°31′58.0″N, 31°59′25.0″E
V. cymbalaria (n = 1) HMM32 (OLD) Turkey. Selge 37°13′04.0″N, 31°07′45.0″E
V. dentata F. W. Schmidt (n = 14) BR178 (SALA) Austria. Niederösterreich, Krems 48°24′18.1″N, 15°31′04.4″E
V. filiformis Sm. (n = 1) DCA144 (WU) Germany. Bonn-Venusberg 50°41′43.0″N, 07°06′10.0″E
V. filiformis (n = 1) DCA954 (MJG) Turkey. Cam Pass 41°13′33.0″N, 42°27′44.0″E
V. filiformis (n = 1) DCA892 (MJG) Turkey. Uzungoel 40°35′00.0″N, 40°19′00.0″E
V. fruticans Jacq. (n = 1) LS1408 (WU) USA. Seedling. Botanical Garden, New York NA
V. fruticulosa L. (n = 1) DCA71 (BONN) Germany. Seedling. Botanical Garden, Bonn NA
V. gentianoides Vahl (n = 1) DCA350 (WU) Georgia. Terek-Tal 42°34′51.6″N, 44°25′12.0″E
V. gentianoides (n = 1) DCA297 (WU) Georgia. Kreuzpass 42°31′02.0″N, 44°28′00.0″E
V. gentianoides (n = 1) MO1598 (SALA) Georgia. Great Caucasus, Monument Bidara 42°29′33.0″N, 44°27′10.0″E
V. hectori Hook. f. subsp. coarctata (Cheeseman) Garn.-Jones (n = 1) HMM38 (OLD) cult. Germany ex New Zealand. Botanical Garden, Bonn NA
V. incana L. (n = 1) BF11726 (WU) Serbia. Grgurevci 45°06′36.0″N, 19°40′05.0″E
V. jacquinii Baumg. (n = 2)c BR108 (SALA) Bosnia-Herzegovina. Trebinje 42°41′02.1″N, 18°17′49.2″E
V. jacquinii (n = 2)c BR112 (SALA) Croatia. Dubrovnik, Gromača 42°43′28.0″N, 18°01′4.0″E
V. jacquinii (n = 1)c SA389 (SALA) Montenegro. Kotor, Lovćen 42°25′04.9″N, 18°47′38.8″E
V. jacquinii (n = 2)c SA390 (SALA) Montenegro. Kotor, Lovćen 42°25′04.9″N, 18°47′38.8″E
V. jacquinii (n = 1)c SA391 (SALA) Montenegro. Žabljak 43°09′49.6″N, 19°09′00.3″E
V. javalambrensis Pau (n = 30)c DP1278 (SALA) Spain. Burgos. Ciruelos de Cervera 41°54′50.4″N, 3°29′47.9″W
V. missurica Raf. subsp. major (Hook.) M. M. Mart. Ort. & Albach (n = 1) DCA124 (K) England. Seedling. Botanical Garden, Kew NA
V. ochracea (Ashwin) Garn.-Jones (n = 1) HMM39 (OLD) cult. Germany ex New Zealand. Botanical Garden, Bonn NA
V. officinalis L. (n = 1) DCA114 (K) England. Seedling. Botanical Garden, Kew NA
V. orbiculata A. Kern. (n = 1)a BR110 (SALA) Croatia. Pelješac peninsula 42°56′14.2″N, 17°22′39.5″E
V. orbiculata (n = 2)c MO5547 (SALA) Croatia. Prapatnice 43°13′16.1″N, 17°21′35.0″E
V. orbiculata (n = 1)c SA392 (SALA) Montenegro. Žabljak 43°09′49.6″N, 19°09′00.3″E
V. orchidea Crantz (n = 1) KBps57 (WU) Bulgaria. Lovech 43°01′59.0″N, 24°18′09.0″E
V. orchidea (n = 1) KBps54 (WU) Bulgaria. Lovech 43°10′49.0″N, 24°44′56.0″E
V. orchidea (n = 1) KB847 (WU) Hungary. Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg 47°45′02.0″N, 21°52′02.0″E
V. orsiniana Ten. (n = 30)c MO6056 (SALA) Spain. Teruel. Iglesuela del Cid 40°27′35.9″N, 0°18′46.5″W
V. panormitana Tineo ex Guss. (n = 1) HMM29 (OLD) Turkey. North of Paravallar 36°40′02.0″N, 31°53′03.0″E
V. planopetiolata G. Simpson & J. S. Thomson (n = 1) HMM40 (OLD) New Zealand. Shotover Saddle 44°31′21.6″S, 168°40′24.0″E
V. rosea Desf. (n = 30)c DP1368 (SALA) Morocco. Meknès-Tafilalet, Midelt 32°36′21.1″N, 4°48′39.7″W
V. salicornioides Hook. f. (n = 1) HMM69 (OLD) cult. Kew ex New Zealand. Botanical Garden, Kew NA
V. speciosa R. Cunn. ex A. Cunn. (n = 1) PGJ2878 (OLD) cult. New Zealand ex cult. New Zealand. Wellington NA
V. trichadena Jord. & Fourr. (n = 1) HMM30 (OLD) Spain. Mallorca, Camí des Raiguer NA
V. triphyllos L. (n = 1) DCAs434 (OLD) Germany. Seedling. Botanical Garden, Oldenburg NA
V. vindobonensis M. A. Fisch. (n = 1) KBch54 (WU) Hungary. Heves megye 47°50′19.0″N, 19°57′44.0″E

Note: n = number of individuals used in the population genetic analyses; NA = not available.

a

Abbreviations (collector numbers): BF = Bozo Frajman; BR = Blanca M. Rojas-Andrés; DCA = Dirk C. Albach; DP = Daniel Pinto-Carrasco; HMM = Heidi M. Meudt; KB = Katharina E. Bardy; LS = Lena Struwe; MO = M. Montserrat Martínez-Ortega; PGJ = Phil Garnock-Jones; SA = Santiago Andrés-Sánchez.

b

Herbarium specimens are deposited at the herbaria of Universidad de Salamanca (SALA), Universität Wien (WU), University of Bonn (BONN), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K), Johannes Gutenberg-Universität (MJG), and Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (OLD); DNA samples are deposited at Biobanco de ADN Vegetal (Universidad de Salamanca) and Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (Germany).

c

Populations used to generate the data included in Appendix 2.

Appendix 2.

Primers rejected during the study and reason for discarding.

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif PCR product size GenBank accession no. Ta (°C) Discarding reason
1 F: TGATAGGGTTTGTGCGTGAG (TTG)6 146 KT005181 52 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: TGTCGACCAAACCAAAACAA
2 F: CCCTTTGGAGTTGTTATGATCG (AT)5 149 Unsuccessful amplification
R: GAATGAACGGTTTAAGTGGACA
3 F: AACAAATCATAAGCAATGCCA (TA)5 208 KT005182 58 Monomorphic
R: CGCTAGTGTCATCATGTTATGC
4 F: AATTAAATTTCGCGGATCCTT (TC)14 157 Unsuccessful amplification
R: CGGTCTTACCAATGGCAGAT
5 F: GCTGGAAAGAAAACCCAACA (ACA)5 104 KT005183 50 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: TTGCATTGGATTTTGAACCA
6 F: CGAAATCAGAATCAACACCAA (AAC)6 92 KT005184 52 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: GAATCATCGATTGGGATCTTT
7 F: CCCGAGTAGCGCTTGTTTTA (TC)8 152 Unsuccessful amplification
R: CACGAGTATGGGACGATTCA
9 F: GCACGGAAACAACATGAACA (AG)8 267 KT005185 52 Unsuccessful amplification in the Iberian clade
R: TCCCCATCATAATCACAATCA
11 F: TTGTTGGTTTTGGTTTGTGG (CTT)12 91 Unsuccessful amplification
R: GATGAACTCCAATCTACCCCA
12 F: GCCACGGAGACTCAGGTTAG (GTT)5 132 KT005186 55 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: TGACGAATAGCAATAGACAACGA
14 F: AAAGATAATTGTCCTAAAGTTAAGGGG (ATGG)6 140 Unsuccessful amplification
R: GCAGCATTATGCAGGTAGATT
15 F: ACGCTTGAACGCGTCTAACA (GT)6 144 KT005187 54 Monomorphic
R: AGATCCCCACTCACGATCTC
16 F: ATCGAGGACGGATTTAGGCT (GTA)5 113 KT005188 56 Monomorphic
R: AAGTGCCCTTTCCTCCAAAC
17 F: GAGTGATCGAAAGATTGCATTAAG (GTG)6 148 KT005189 54 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: TCCTCCCTAATTCCTCCGAC
18 F: TTGAATATCAGGATCTTGTGCG (TCT)6 91 KT005190 58 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: AAGTAATATGTCCATAAGTTCATCAGG
21 F: AGAGGATGAAGACTCAGGCG (GAA)9 140 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TGTCAGCTTTGGTGGAAGAA
22 F: GACGACGATCATCCAGATCC (AGA)6 147 KT005191 52 Presence of indels
R: CCGATTTCCTTTCGAATCAT
23 F: AAACTTGTGAAACTGTTTGAATGG (CA)5 90 Unsuccessful amplification
R: ATGCTCAGCGGAAGTATTTGA
24 F: TTCCGATATTTCCGTTCTGC (GAG)6 142 KT005192 52 Presence of indels
R: CCATTCTACCCTCCGAACAA
25 F: GCACAAGGTAGCATTTGCATT (TTG)9 142 Unsuccessful amplification
R: AGGGCGGGTAAAGGATAGAA
28 F: GTGTTCGTGTTTTAAATTTGCTT (GAG)11 141 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TCACTCATATACCTAGTGACTGAACTG
29 F: TTGAATCCATTTCTTATTGGTTTG (TTC)7 90 KT005193 53 Unsuccessful amplification in the Iberian clade
R: CAATCGTGGTAACACATCATGG
30 F: CTTCCTTACCTCACCTCACTCTG (CAT)5 91 KT005194 53 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: TGGTGTTTTGTTGATAGATTGATT
31 F: GCCATTGCCTTGTTTTGAGT (GA)9 91 Unsuccessful amplification
R: CATCAACCATGATCCATCCA
32 F: ATTGAGCGACACTCGTCAGA (AC)7 140 KT005195 52 Monomorphic
R: CAATGGCTTTAAATGAATCCC
33 F: TTCAGCTCATGACCAAGAACA (AAG)6 123 KT005196 50 Unsuccessful amplification in the Iberian clade
R: CAAATAGGGCATTCCGACAT
34 F: TAAACAAACAGATTGGTGGTCG (TAA)6 190 KT005197 54 Unsuccessful amplification in the Iberian clade
R: CCTTATGTCACTGAAAACCTACCT
36 F: CGGTGCCAAATTAAGATATTG (ACTC)5 182 Unsuccessful amplification
R: GCGGTGAAGAAAGGTTTTGA
37 F: TGCACCCCTACTCGAGAAAT (CT)8 120 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TCCATTTAATTGTAAGCCCCA
38 F: ACAGGTTGTGCGGAAGAAGT (TGT)9 155 KT005198 52 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: GTGTGCCAACAAATCAAGGA
39 F: GAAAAGAATTACCAACACGC (AAAG)6 93 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TTAAGGCCTAGCTAGCAGAA
40 F: ATCTCCAAAACTCAGATCCA (AAC)6 86 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TTAAGGCCTAGCTAGCAGAA
41 F: TCATAGCTTCTTCTCTTCGG (CTT)5 85 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TATGATGGCCTTCAAAACAT
42 F: TGTATTATTCTATGAGACGCCA (TG)16 193 KT005199 52 Suboptimal quality of the sequences
R: GTGAGAAGACATATGAAAAGCA
43 F: ACGATAACTTTCCGGTGAA (GA)8 179 Unsuccessful amplification
R: CAACCATTTTCTTCATACACAG
44 F: CTTTTAAATGTCTTTCTGGAGG (TTG)5 179 KT005200 52 Monomorphic
R: ATGTCCTTCATAGTAAACGTCC
45 F: CTTATCCTTGAATTTCATCTCC (ACA)6 174 KT005201 52 Presence of indels
R: GATTATTTTACGGTTAGACGGA
46 F: AAGCTTGAGTGGATTAAATGTT (GTT)6 239 KT005202 55 Presence of indels
R: AACTCTTACCACCTCAAATCAC
47 F: AGTAATCAATTCTCACTTGGCT (TC)5 236 KT005203 53 Monomorphic
R: ACAACCCTAGTTCATACCAAAG
48 F: TGAACAAATGTACAGCTAGAGG (TG)9 246 KT005204 54 Presence of indels
R: GATGAGGAGAAGGAGTGTATGT
51 F: ATTGTTGTATATGCGAATCTTG (CA)8 303 Unsuccessful amplification
R: TTCCATGTAAATTTCACTACCA
53 F: GAATACATTCAGACCACGTCTT (TC)8 301 KT005205 52 Unsuccessful amplification in the Iberian clade
R: AAACGATAGAGTCTCAAGAGGA

Note: — = no information available; Ta = annealing temperature.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Albach D. C., Martínez-Ortega M. M., Fischer M. A., Chase M. W. 2004. A new classification of the Veroniceae: Problems and possible solution. Taxon 53: 429–452. [Google Scholar]
  2. Albach D. C., Martínez-Ortega M. M., Delgado L., Weiss-Schneeweiss H., Özgocke F., Fischer M. A. 2008. Chromosome numbers in Veroniceae (Plantaginaceae): Review and several new counts. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 95: 543–566. [Google Scholar]
  3. Doyle J. J., Doyle J. L. 1987. CTAB DNA extraction in plants. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. Excoffier L., Lischer H. E. L. 2010. Arlequin suite version 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garnock-Jones P., Albach D. C., Briggs G. 2007. Botanical names in Southern Hemisphere Veronica (Plantaginaceae): sect. Detzneria, sect. Hebe, and sect. Labiatoides. Taxon 56: 571–582. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lehmann E. 1937. Die Gattung Veronica in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Betrachtung. Cytologia (Fujii Jubilaei Volumen): 903–919. [Google Scholar]
  7. Malausa T., Gilles A., Meglécz E., Blanquart H., Duthoy S., Costedoat C., Dubut V., et al. 2011. High-throughput microsatellite isolation through 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing of enriched DNA libraries. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 638–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meglécz E., Costedoat C., Dubut V., Gilles A., Malausa T., Pech N., Martin J. 2010. QDD: A user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26: 403–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Peñas De Giles J., Martínez-Ortega M. M., Pérez LaTorre A. V., Cabezudo Artero B. 2004. Veronica tenuifolia subsp. fontqueri (Pau) M. M. Mart. Ort. & E. Rico. In A. Bañares, G. Blanca, J. Güemes, J. C. Moreno, and S. Ortiz [eds.], Atlas y Libro Rojo de la flora vascular amenazada de España, 564–565. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza, Madrid, Spain. [Google Scholar]
  10. Petrova A., Vladimirov V. 2009. Red List of Bulgarian vascular plants. Phytologia Balcanica 15: 63–94. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rojas-Andrés B. M., Albach D. C., Martínez-Ortega M. M. 2015. Exploring the intricate evolutionary history of the diploid-polyploid complex Veronica subsection Pentasepalae Benth. (Plantaginaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179: in press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Scheerer H. 1949. Zur Polyploidie und Genetik der Veronica—Gruppe Pentasepala. Planta 37: 293–298. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schuelke M. 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES