Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia logoLink to Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
. 2015 Sep 8;50(5):550–555. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.08.013

Patellar tendinopathy: late-stage results from surgical treatment☆

Tendinopatia patelar: resultados tardios do tratamento cirúrgico

Marcos Henrique Frauendorf Cenni a,⁎, Thiago Daniel Macedo Silva b, Bruno Fajardo do Nascimento a, Rodrigo Cristiano de Andrade a, Lúcio Flávio Biondi Pinheiro Júnior a, Oscar Pinheiro Nicolai a
PMCID: PMC4610993  PMID: 26535202

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the late-stage results from surgical treatment of patellar tendinopathy (PT), using the Visa score (Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group) and the Verheyden method.

Methods

This was a retrospective study in which the postoperative results from 12 patients (14 knees) who were operated between July 2002 and February 2011 were evaluated. The patients included in the study presented patellar tendinopathy that was refractory to conservative treatment, without any other concomitant lesions. Patients who were not properly followed up during the postoperative period were excluded.

Results

Using the Verheyden method, nine patients were considered to have very good results, two had good results and one had poor results. In relation to Visa, the mean was 92.4 points and only two patients had scores less than 70 points (66 and 55 points).

Conclusion

When surgical treatment for patellar tendinopathy is correctly indicated, it has good long-term results.

Keywords: Patellar tendon, Tendinopathy/surgery, Retrospective studies

Introduction

Patellar tendinopathy is a common disorder among athletes, especially in activities that involve jumping and eccentric overloading on flexed knees.1, 2 It was initially described as jumper's knee by Blazina et al.,3 and it also has synonyms relating to individuals’ specific sports practices, such as: high-jumper's knee, volley-baller's knee and cross-country knee.4

It generally affects individuals aged 20–40 years, with similar prevalence in men and women. It occurs most frequently at the lower pole of the patella (70%), followed by the upper pole (25%) and lastly the distal insertion of the tendon (5%).5

Patellar tendinopathy presents as well-localized anterior knee pain that relates to physical activity. The pain generally begins insidiously and gradually, relating to increasing quantity and intensity of training, or to activity that requires repetitive knee movements.6

In histological studies, the tendon presents degenerative and inflammatory alterations that may result in microtears, especially close to the lower pole of the patella.7

Blazina's classification was the first to be used in cases of patellar tendinopathy3 and it divided the pain into four grades: grade I –mild pain after physical activity; grade II –pain at the start of physical activity, with improvement after warming up and worsening at the end of the exercise, without any decrease in yield; grade III –pain during and after physical activity, with significant worsening of the athlete's yield; and grade IV –partial or total tearing of the tendon. Subsequently, it was modified by Roels et al.8

Among the intrinsic causes of patellar tendinopathy, the following can be highlighted: deficiency of the blood supply and lower elasticity of the proximal segment of the tendon4; and degeneration secondary to a chronic inflammatory process in the tissues adjacent to the tendon and bone impact during flexion, due to a prominent lower pole of the patella.9 The extrinsic factors are related to erroneous training, poorly guided physical activities and other overloads in a flexed position within day-to-day activities.

The diagnosis is based on the history and the clinical examination, and is complemented by radiographic, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. Radiography shows the morphology of the inferior pole of the patella and may show calcifications in the tendon, while ultrasonography and MRI may show structural and inflammatory alterations of the tendon, such as thickening, degeneration and tears.10, 11

The initial treatment is conservative, with the aims of pain relief and functional recovery. It begins with institution of relative rest, modification of activities and control over predisposing factors, in association with use of medications and physiotherapy. This is effective is most cases, but with a risk of recurrence.12, 13, 14, 15 Functional rehabilitation consists of analgesic and anti-inflammatory measures in association with mechanical therapy consisting of eccentric strengthening and specific stretching.16, 17, 18

Other treatment options such as injection of corticosteroids are also used, although many authors present divergent opinions regarding their efficacy and safety.19 Application of platelet-rich plasma has been gaining more followers, but the results presented remain inconclusive.20, 21

Surgical treatment is indicated in cases that evolve with persistent pain and functional limitation after a minimum period of 6 months of well-executed conservative treatment.22 The presence of structural alterations of the tendon and impact with the lower pole of the patella are factors relating to failure of conservative treatment.23

The surgical treatment consists of debridement of the degenerated tissue by means of longitudinal cuts in the tendon and abrasion of the inferior pole of the patella. It can be done in conformity with the technique described by Blazina et al.3 (open) or arthroscopically.24, 25 The objective of the present study was to demonstrate the late-stage result from surgical treatment of patellar tendinitis in patients who evolved poorly with conservative treatment.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective study in which the late-stage postoperative results from 12 patients (14 knees) who underwent operations between July 2002 and February 2011 were evaluated.

Twenty-one patients with a diagnosis of patellar tendinopathy that was resistant to the initial treatment underwent surgical treatment performed by the same surgeon. These patients comprised 20 men and one woman.

All of these patients were amateur athletes and were doing at least one regular physical activity, such as running, tennis, soccer or basketball. In their clinical histories, they presented reports of chronic pain that had not improved through conservative treatment over a period of at least 6 months. The right knee was affected in seven patients, the left knee in 12 and both knees in two cases.

Seven patients were excluded because they presented other concomitant surgical lesions (three with arthrosis, two with significant patellar chondropathy, one with a lesion of the medial meniscus and one with associated tendinopathy of the quadriceps). Two patients did not return for the late-stage reassessments. Twelve patients were duly followed up and underwent the assessment protocol.

The diagnosis of patellar tendinopathy was basically clinical, grounded in the anamnesis and physical examination. The main clinical finding was pain on palpation of the lower pole of the patella. Other findings from the physical examination were hypotrophy and diminished muscle strength of the quadriceps.

All the patients underwent imaging examinations (radiography and magnetic resonance), with a view to better preoperative planning. The surgical indication was based fundamentally on morphological alterations of the inferior pole of the patella (prominent patella), observed on radiographic examination (Fig. 1), and on degeneration of the patellar tendon (tendinosis) on magnetic resonance (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Radiograph showing alteration of the morphology of the patella, with the point in its lower pole (prominent patella).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Magnetic resonance imaging on one of the patients, showing the area of impact of the tendon with the lower pole of the patella, with thickening, edema and partial tearing of the patellar tendon.

Among the patients included in this study, 10 were operated arthroscopically, with conventional anteromedial and anterolateral portals and a central transtendinous accessory portal (Fig. 3). In all the cases, the following were performed: local synovectomy, partial resection of Hoffa's fat, partial resection of the lower pole of the patella using an abrasion shaver blade and longitudinal cuts in the proximal portion of the tendon through the central portal.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Conventional arthroscopic portals and patellar transtendon accessory portal (central).

Two patients underwent surgery using Blazina's technique, by means of an infrapatellar longitudinal incision along the median line, with opening of the peritendon and resection of a bone fragment from the lower pole of the patella and the central degenerated fragment of the tendon (in a v-shape), which did not interfere with its distal insertion.3 The indications for the open technique were due to the presence of calcification in one patient (Fig. 4, Fig. 5) and partial tearing of the patellar tendon in another patient.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Radiological image of the calcification of the patellar tendon.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Image of calcification of the patellar tendon after its resection via open surgery.

All the patients were evaluated by the same examiner.

Results

The postoperative follow-up ranged in length from 2.3 to 10.9 years (mean of 6.8). The age group was from 16 to 48 years (mean of 29.7).

In the postoperative evaluation, the Visa score (Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group),26, 27, 28 which is specific for this pathological condition, and the Verheyden method29 were used.

The evaluation method described by Verheyden et al.29 includes a subjective part that takes into consideration whether the patient returned to sports activities at the same level as before, the patient's degree of satisfaction with the surgery and whether he would be willing to undergo the procedure again. In the objective part of this method, the presence of pain on palpation of the lower pole of the patella was observed, the apprehension test was used, the range of motion was measured and the presence of muscle atrophy was assessed by measuring the diameter of the thigh at 10 and 20 cm from the medial interline. The patients were then classified as follows:

  • •

    Very good: Patients without pain or limitation on their daily and sports activities, without muscle atrophy or pain on palpation of the lower pole of the patella, and also a negative apprehension test. When asked, they stated that they would undergo the surgery again.

  • •

    Good: Patients who presented mild to moderate pain during physical activities, but without any need to interrupt them; with mild pain on palpation of the lower pole or facets of the patella and muscle atrophy of less than 2 cm. When asked, they stated that they would undergo the surgery again.

  • •

    Poor: Patients who reported having moderate to severe pain after long periods seated and during sports practice; with limitation on their activities, pain in the lower pole or facets of the patella and major atrophy of the quadriceps (greater than 2 cm). They stated that they would not undergo the surgery again.

Nine patients were classified as very good, two as good and one as poor. In relation to Visa, 11 patients presented results greater than 66 points, with a range from 66 to 100 (mean of 92.4), and one patient had 55 points. This last patient was the one who was classified as poor according to the Verheyden protocol (Table 1).

Table 1.

Correlation of patients, age, length of follow-up and results according to the two evaluation methods.

Patient Age (years) Length of follow-up (months) Occurrence Surgical route Visa score Verheyden score
1 28 131 Unilateral Arthroscopic 100 Very good
2 32 117 Unilateral Arthroscopic 97 Very good
3 41 110 Unilateral Arthroscopic 98 Very good
4 18 103 Unilateral Arthroscopic 89 Very good
5 23 101 Unilateral Arthroscopic 82 Good
6 16 47 Unilateral Arthroscopic 94 Very good
7 18 106 Bilateral Arthroscopic 66 Good
8 48 82 Bilateral Arthr/Blazina 55 Poor
9 41 64 Unilateral Arthroscopic 97 Very good
10 18 48 Unilateral Arthroscopic 98 Very good
11 35 54 Unilateral Blazina 98 Very good
12 37 28 Unilateral Arthroscopic 98 Very good
Open in a new tab

None of the patients were reoperated.

Discussion

In the group of patients studied here, all of them were amateur athletes who did at least one regular physical activity, such as running, tennis, soccer or basketball. Basketball was practiced by seven patients, and this level of incidence can be explained by the surgeon's participation in an association of veterans of this sport. Blazina et al.3 observed injuries in several other types of sport, such as American football and volleyball. Stanish et al.30 observed that the highest loads imposed on the ligament occurred during deceleration (eccentric overload), such as in the movements that occur in jumping and in sports.

The greater occurrence among men (91.6%) was not in line with the literature, which shows homogenous distribution between the sexes.

The treatment for patellar tendinopathy is generally conservative and the introduction of eccentric exercises for the quadriceps has significantly reduced the number of patients requiring surgery.17, 18 The good results from conservative treatment in most patients explain the small number of published studies in the literature on surgical treatment for this pathological condition and the small number of cases operated.12, 13 In turn, this explains the small sample size of our study. Panni et al.31 reported on nine patients who underwent operations; Griffiths and Selesnick,32 seven; Andrade et al.,33 six; and Romeo and Larson,34 only two.

The mean age of the patients in our study was 29.7 years, and this is in line with what can be seen in the literature, which is generally between 20 and 40 years of age.33

The postoperative follow-up of our patients was long, which increases the reliability of the late-stage surgical results (minimum of 2 years and mean of more than 6 years).

Surgical treatment generally produces good results,22, 24 independent of the techniques used. However, several studies have shown that despite the satisfactory results, most patients significantly reduce their level of physical activities. It is difficult to pinpoint whether this is due to the surgical result or to other unrelated factors.6, 8 Andrade et al.33 showed that with the exception of only one patient, all the others returned to their sports at the same level of activity as before the pathological condition.

The arthroscopic surgical technique was chosen for the majority of the cases because we considered this to be a minimally invasive method with a faster return to day-to-day and sports activities, as also observed by Lorbach et al.25

The Visa score26, 27, 28 was chosen because of its specificity for evaluating patients with patella tendinopathy. The evaluation method proposed by Verheyden et al.29 was chosen because we considered that it would be better to evaluate the patients both subjectively and objectively. The proportion of very good and good results (91.67% or 11 patients) was in line with the literature, which demonstrates high rates of good results from surgical treatment. Panni et al.31 reported that 100% of their results were excellent or good; Coleman et al.35 showed that 96% benefited in relation to their symptoms; Verheyden et al.29 found that 87% of their results were very good or good; Griffiths and Selesnick32 obtained good results in 86% of their cases; Fritschy and Wallensten36 found that 81% of their patients were cured; and Benazzo et al.37 found that 76% presented good results. In our study, there was a direct correlation between the two assessment means used, such that the lowest rate observed using Visa corresponded to the patient who was considered poor according to the Verheyden method.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment for patellar tendinitis by means of either an arthroscopic or an open technique showed satisfactory late-stage results both in our experience and in the literature. These results led to pain relief and made it possible for the patients to return to sports activities. Over the course of the patients’ evolution, we did not observe any recurrences or need for reoperation. However, surgery should only be indicated after a long period of adequate conservative treatment.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

☆

Work performed in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

References

  • 1.Zwerver J. Patellar tendinopaty (jumper's knee): a common and difficult-to-treat sports injury. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008;152(33):1831–1837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohen M., Ferreti M., Marcondes F.B., Amaro J.T., Ejnisman B. Tendinopatia patelar. Rev Bras Ortop. 2008;43(8):309–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blazina M.E., Kerlan R.K., Jobe F.W., Carter V.S., Carlson G.J. Jumper's knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973;4(3):665–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plapler P.G., Camanho G.L., Saldiva P.H.N. Avaliação numérica das ondulações das fibras colágenas em ligamento patelar humano (tendão patelar) Rev Bras Ortop. 2001;36(8):317–321. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rees J.D., Houghton J., Srikanthan A., West A. The location of pathology in patellar tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(9):e2. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zwerver J., Bredeweg S.W., van den Akker-Scheek I. Prevalence of jumper's knee among nonelite athletes from different sports: a cross-sectional survey. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1984–1988. doi: 10.1177/0363546511413370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rath E., Schwarzkopf R., Richmond J.C. Clinical signs and anatomical correlation of patellar tendinitis. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(4):435–437. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.69317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roels J., Martens M., Mulier J.C., Burssens A. Patellar tendinitis (jumper's knee) Am J Sports Med. 1978;6(November–December (6)):362–368. doi: 10.1177/036354657800600609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tiemessen I.J., Kuijer P.P., Hulshof C.T., Frings-Dresen M.H. Risk factors for developing jumper's knee in sport and occupation: a review. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:127. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Schie H.T., Docking S.I., Daffy J., Praet S.E., Rosengarten S., Cook J.L. Ultrasound tissue characterization, an innovative technique for injury – prevention and monitoring of tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(9):e2. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iwamoto J., Takeda T., Sato Y., Matsumoto H. Radiographic abnormalities of the inferior pole of the patella in juvenile athletes. Keio J Med. 2009;58(1):50–53. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodriguez-Merchan E.C. The treatment of patellar tendinopathy. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013;14(2):77–81. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0220-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Duthon V.B., Borloz S., Ziltener J.L. Treatment options for patellar tendinopathy. Rev Med Suisse. 2012;8(349):1486–1489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gaida J.E., Cook J. Treatment options for patellar tendinopathy: critical review. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10(5):255–270. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31822d4016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larsson M.E., Käll I., Nilsson-Helander K. Treatment of patellar tendinopathy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(8):1632–1646. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1825-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Biernat R., Trzaskoma Z., Trzaskoma L., Czaprowski D. Rehabilitation protocol for patellar tendinopathy applied amongst 16–19 year old volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;28(1):43–52. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829797b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murtaugh B., Ihm J.M. Eccentric training for the treatment of tendinopathies. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12(3):175–182. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3182933761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Basas García A., Lorenzo A., Gómez-Ruano M.A., Fernández Jaén T., Alvarez Rey G. Eccentric exercises combined with electrical stimulation in the treatment of jumper's knee: a study on six high level jumping athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(9):e2. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kongsgaard M., Kovanen V., Aagaard P., Doessing S., Hansen P., Laursen A.H. Corticosteroid injections, eccentric decline squat training and heavy slow resistance training in patellar tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(6):790–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00949.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gosens T., Den Oudsten B.L., Fievez E., Van’t Spijker P., Fievez A. Pain and activity levels before and after platelet-rich plasma injection treatment of patellar tendinopathy: a prospective cohort study and the influence of previous treatments. Int Orthop. 2012;36(9):1941–1946. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1540-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harmon K., Drezner J., Rao A. Platelet rich plasma for chronic tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(9):e2. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cucurulo T., Louis M.L., Thaunat M., Franceschi J.P. Surgical treatment of patellar tendinopathy in athletes. A retrospective multicentric study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(8 Suppl. 1):S78–S84. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sarimo J., Sarin J., Orava S., Heikkilä J., Rantanen J., Paavola M. Distal patellar tendinosis: an unusual form of jumper's knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(1):54–57. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0135-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaeding C.C., Pedroza A.D., Powers B.C. Surgical treatment of chronic patellar tendinosis: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:102–106. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318030841c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lorbach O., Diamantopoulos A., Paessler H.H. Arthroscopic resection of the lower patellar pole in patients with chronic patellar tendinosis. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Visentini P.J., Khan K.M., Cook J.L., Kiss Z.S., Harcourt P.R., Wark J.D. The Visa score: an index of severity of symptoms in patients with jumper's knee (patellar tendinosis) J Sci Med Sport. 1998;1(1):22–28. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(98)80005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hernandez-Sanchez S., Hidalgo M.D., Gomez A. Responsiveness of the VISA-P scale for patellar tendinopathy in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(6):453–457. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wageck B.B., De Noronha M., Lopes A.D., Da Cunha R.A., Takahashi R.H., Costa L.O. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (Visa-P) scale. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(3):163–171. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Verheyden F., Geens G., Nelen G. Jumper's knee: results of surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Belg. 1997;63(2):102–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stanish W.D., Rubinovich R.M., Curwin S. Eccentric exercise in chronic tendinitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(208):65–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Panni A.S., Tartarone M., Maffulli N. Patellar tendinopathy in athletes. Outcome of nonoperative and operative management. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(3):392–397. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280031901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Griffiths G.P., Selesnick F.H. Operative treatment and arthroscopic findings in chronic patellar tendinitis. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(8):836–839. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Andrade M.A.P., Nogueira S.R.S., Heluy G.D. Tendinite patelar: resultado do tratamento cirúrgico. Rev Bras Ortop. 2003;38(4):186–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Romeo A.A., Larson R.V. Arthroscopic treatment of infrapatellar tendonitis. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(3):341–345. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(99)70048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Coleman B.D., Khan K.M., Kiss Z.S., Bartlett J., Young D.A., Wark J.D. Open and arthroscopic patellar tenotomy for chronic patellar tendinopathy. A retrospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(2):183–190. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280020801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fritschy D., Wallensten R. Surgical treatment of patellar tendinitis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1(2):131–133. doi: 10.1007/BF01565468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Benazzo F., Stennardo G., Valli M. Achilles and patellar tendinopathies in athletes: pathogenesis and surgical treatment. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1996;54(4):236–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology

RESOURCES