Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 21;5:15481. doi: 10.1038/srep15481

Influences of carbon concentration on crystal structures and ideal strengths of B2CxO compounds in the B-C-O system

Meiguang Zhang 1,a, Haiyan Yan 2, Baobing Zheng 1, Qun Wei 3
PMCID: PMC4614479  PMID: 26486803

Abstract

The search for novel superhard materials with special structures and improved thermal stability and hardness remains considerably experimental and theoretical challenges. Recent reports proposed that higher carbon content in ternary B2CxO compounds, which are isoelectronic with diamond, would lead to increased strength and hardness. This notion was derived from the calculated elastic parameters and empirical hardness formulas based on structural and electronic properties of the equilibrium structures. In present work, we introduce three potential ultra-incompressible and thermodynamically stable B2CxO (x ≥ 2) phases via a systematic particle swarm optimization algorithm structure searches. By evaluating the trends of the crystal configuration, electronic structure, and mechanical properties as a function of the C concentration, it is found that the high carbon concentration benefits the formation of the sp3 C-C covalent bonds and leads to the enhanced elastic moduli and ideal strengths in these B2CxO compounds. Studies of strain-stress behavior at large deformation, however, indicate that all these B2CxO compounds possess substantially lower ideal shear strengths than those of diamond and c-BN, suggesting that they may not be intrinsically superhard.


The quest for intrinsic superhard materials is inspired by scientific curiosity and the need of materials with high hardness, high thermal stability, and oxidation resistance in industrial applications. Since successful laboratory syntheses of diamond and cubic boron nitride (c-BN), efforts to synthesize other novel materials with improved thermal stability and hardness have been actively pursued1,2,3. Traditionally, it is commonly accepted that superhard materials are formed by light elements (B, C, N and O) for the belief that relatively short bond lengths and strong covalent bonds in these materials, which make them to be primary candidates for low-compressibility or superhard materials. Following this strategy, significant progresses have been achieved in synthesizing superhard BCxN4,5,6,7,8,9, BCx10,11, γ-B2812, and BxO13,14,15 which has opened up a new route to research superhard materials in B-C-N-O systems. Of particular interest is the synthesized ternary superhard material, BC2N, the second hardest known material with a Vickers hardness of 76 GPa5. Meanwhile, there are also several theoretical approaches16,17,18 for designing and predicting new potential superhard materials to complement experimental works. A characteristic feature of the electronic structure of diamond, essential for its hardness, is the presence, in the valence level of each carbon atom, of four electrons capable of taking part in the formation of four strong tetrahedrally directed covalent bonds. Thus in the search for new superhard materials, it is natural to try to reproduce this property of diamond. The composition of a multicomponent light elements compound isoelectronic with diamond involves the determination of a set of solutions of indefinite equations of the form16.

graphic file with name srep15481-m1.jpg

where n1, n2, n3 · · · are the numbers of valence electrons in the atoms of the components, n is an integral positive number, and X, Y, Z · · · are the required concentrations.

In contrast to the extensively studied B-C-N system, the ternary B-C-O compounds have become the subject of close attention during the last decade. Experimentally, several B-C-O materials at high pressure and high temperature have been synthesized, such as single crystals of interstitial phases B(C,O)x19,20. Recently, a potential superhard ternary material B2CO which is isoelectronic with diamond, stabilized in two tetragonal diamond-like structures (tP4 and tI16) with claimed hardness of 50 GPa was predicted by Li et al.21. Moreover, it was also proposed that more ternary compounds which are isoelectronic with diamond exist in B-C-O system, such as B2CxO (x ≥ 2) with higher carbon content could possess higher strength and hardness than those of B2CO. This is based on the intuitive argument that more carbon content should bring the hybrid compounds closer to diamond in their mechanical properties because of the larger proportion of the strong sp3 C-C bonds in the structures. It was more recently proposed that an orthorhombic B2C5O phase within Cmm2 symmetry22 exhibits higher hardness (66.1 GPa) than that of B2CO. These important pioneering works give us broadened views into the essence of atomic binding in solids while inevitably advance our understanding on the structural stability and superior properties of B2CxO in the B-C-O system. Therefore, to extend the ultrahard structures for other family members and investigate the effects of the carbon concentration on the mechanical behaviors of B2CxO (x ≥ 2) compounds are of great interest and highly desirable. To address these issues, we here perform extensive structure searches to explore the potential energetically stable B2CxO (x ≥ 2) phases at ambient pressure using the prevalent developed Crystal structure AnaLYsis by Particle Swarm Optimization package (CALYPSO)23,24, unbiased by any known information. This method has been successfully applied to extensive structures which have been confirmed by independent experiments25,26,27,28,29. Two typical examples: the experimental crystal structures of cold-compressed graphite phase and synthesized cubic BC3 phase which have been recently resolved25,29. Three novel tetragonal diamond-like structures with group symmetry I41/amd, I-4m2, and P-4m2 for B2C2O, B2C3O, and B2C5O were uncovered, surprisingly, all these new structures can be derived from the previous proposed tP4-B2CO supercells. First principles calculations were then executed to characterize the trends of the crystal structures, electronic structures, and mechanical behaviors of these predicted phases.

Results and Discussion

Variable-cell simulations with 1–4 formula units (f.u.) in the unit cell were performed at ambient pressure, and our structure searches uncover the most stable structure for B2C2O, B2C3O, and B2C5O to be tetragonal I41/amd (4 f.u./cell), I-4m2 (2 f.u./cell), and P-4m2 (1 f.u./cell) phase, respectively. All these three structures are schematically showed in Fig. 1, together with the previous proposed tP4-B2CO (2 f.u./cell, space group: P-4m2)21. As presented in Fig. 1, the structure characteristics of B2CxO compounds with increasing carbon content can be revealed as follows. Firstly, there exists a striking structural connections between B2CxO (x = 2, 3, 5) and tP4-B2CO, that each B2CxO compound can be derived from a different tP4-B2CO supercell with replacement of the partial O and B atoms by C atoms. For example, the predicted P-4m2-B2C5O (Fig. 1(d)) can be constructed by a 1 × 1 × 2 tP4-B2CO supercell (Fig. 1(a)) by replacing two boron atoms at 2g and one oxygen atom at 1c positions to ensure the stoichiometry of B:C:O is 2:5:1. Secondly, similar to the atomic bonding behaviors in tP4-B2CO, all nonequivalent atoms in each B2CxO compound are all tetrahedrally bonded with sp3 bonding environment. Moreover, in Figures of 1(b)-1(d) for B2C2O, B2C3O, and B2C5O, the average number of C-C bond in their building blocks (which can be viewed as a pseudo-tetragonal tP4-B2CO unit cell, see the dashed cell in Fig. 1) increases from 1.6 to 4 with the increasing of carbon content. Thirdly, compare to those of in B2CO and B2C2O, the increasement of sp3 C-C tetrahedral covalent bonds can be clearly revealed in B2C3O and B2C5O at elevated C concentrations, as shown in Fig. 1(c,d). Therefore, high carbon content might benefits the mechanical properties of these B2CxO compounds. The dynamical stability of a crystalline structure requires the eigen frequencies of its lattice vibrations be real for all wavevectors in the whole Brillouin zone. We have thus performed the phonon dispersion calculations for I41/amd-B2C2O, I-4m2-B2C3O, and P-4m2-B2C5O at ambient pressure, as presented in Figure S1. Clearly, no imaginary phonon frequency was detected in the whole Brillouin zone for each predicted tetragonal phase, indicating their dynamical stabilities at ambient conditions. However, the earlier proposed Cmm2-B2C5O22 is dynamical unstable with a wide range of imaginary frequency in the Brillouin zone according to our phonon dispersion calculations. The orthorhombic Cmm2 phase thus can be excluded from the candidates of B2C5O.

Figure 1. Crystal structures of B2CxO.

Figure 1

(a) 1 × 1 × 2 supercell of tP4-B2CO; (b) I41/amd-B2C2O, B atoms occupy the 8e (0, 0, 0.3044), C atoms occupy the 8e (0, 0, 0.1002), and O atoms occupy the 4b (0, 0, 0.5) positions; (c) I-4m2-B2C3O, B atoms occupy the 4f (0, 0.5, 0.5910), C1 atoms occupy the 2c (0, 0.5, 0.25), C2 atoms occupy the 4e (0, 0, 0.3317), and O atoms occupy the 2a (0, 0, 0) positions; (d) P-4m2-B2C5O, B atoms occupy the 2 g (0, 0.5, 0.8624), C1 atoms occupy the 2 g (0, 0.5, 0.3783), C2 atoms occupy the 1d (0, 0, 0.5), C3 atoms occupy the 2f (0.5, 0.5, 0.2551), and O atoms occupy the 1a (0, 0, 0) positions. The blue, black, and red spheres represent B, C, and O atoms, respectively.

The calculated equilibrium lattice constants, average atomic volumes, bulk moduli, and pressure derivatives of bulk moduli for B2CxO compounds are listed in Table 1, along with previous theoretical values of tP4-B2CO21 for comparisons. It can be seen that the lattice parameter a of each B2CxO (x = 2, 3, 5) is close to that of tP4-B2CO, and the lattice parameter c of each B2CxO phase is about five, three, and two times that of tP4-B2CO, respectively. This is in agreement with crystal configuration of each B2CxO pahse as presented in Fig. 1. The bulk moduli and their pressure derivatives are obtained by fitting pressures and volumes with the third-order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state (EOS)30. More detailed structural information on the interatomic distances of these predicted phases are presented in Supplementary Table S1. From Table 1, one can see that the bulk moduli and densities of B2CxO compounds increase continuously with high carbon content, agree well with the decreasement of interatomic distances (see Table S1) in B2CxO compounds. Note that the sp3 C-C tetrahedral covalent bond lengths of B2C3O (1.585 Å) and B2C5O (1.575 and 1.568 Å) are slightly longer than that of diamond (1.535 Å), indicating they might possess excellent mechanical properties. Furthermore, it is important to explore the thermodynamic stability for further experimental synthesis. The thermodynamic stability for each B2CxO compound, with respect to the separate phases as a function of pressure, is quantified in terms of the formation enthalpies in two possible routes:

graphic file with name srep15481-m2.jpg

and

graphic file with name srep15481-m3.jpg

where the α-B31, diamond C, α-O232, and I41/amd-B2O21 are chosen as the reference phases. As shown in Figure S2, the calculated formation enthalpies obtained by this two reaction routes are all negative, which indicate that the formations of these three phases are exothermic at ambient as well as at high pressures. Thus these B2CxO compounds are stable against the decomposition into the mixture of B + C + O or B2O + C and the syntheses of these structures are highly desirable at very readily attainable pressures.

Table 1. Space group (SG), calculated lattice parameters a and c (Å), average atomic volume V 03/atom), density (g/cm3), EOS fitted bulk modulus B 0 (GPa), and pressure derivative B 0′ of each B2CxO.

Compounds SG Source a c V0 ρ B0 B0
tP4-B2CO P-4m2 Ref. 21 2.623 3.623 6.225 3.309    
    This work 2.660 3.680 6.510 3.170 283 3.699
B2C2O I41/amd This work 2.647 18.272 6.40 3.198 298 3.742
B2C3O I-4m2 This work 2.613 10.980 6.246 3.263 321 3.746
B2C5O P-4m2 This work 2.588 7.284 6.098 3.325 348 3.633
B2O I41/amd Ref. 21 2.688 11.116 6.693 3.11 236  

The results of B2O are also listed for comparison.

Figure 2 and 3 show the band structures, total density of states (DOS), and partial DOS for these B2CxO compounds. As shown in Fig. 2(a–d), the indirect semiconductor nature of B2CO and B2C5O are characterized by energy gaps of 1.96 and 2.42 eV between M and Γ points, while B2C2O and B2C3O are direct semiconductors with band gaps of 2.14 and 2.40 eV at Γ points in Fig. 2 (b,c). The increasement of band gaps of these B2CxO compounds can be clearly disclosed with increasing carbon contents. From inspection of their partial DOS curves in Fig. 3, it shows that the peaks from −24 to −21 eV have predominantly O-2s character. From Fig. 3(a–d), the weight of the C-2s and C-2p states increases gradually and the increased overlap of C-2s and C-2p in energy of −19 to −7 eV (B-2p and C-2p in energy of −7 eV to 0 eV ) leads to an enhanced hybridization interactions between C-C atoms (B-C atoms). To analyze the chemical bonding character of different atoms in these B2CxO compounds, electron localization function (ELF)33 and Bader charge analyses34 are calculated as presented in Figure S3 and listed in Table 2. For the selected 3D ELF distributions (ELF = 0.9) of B2C3O and B2C5O, the high electron localization can be seen in the regions of C-C bond and B-C bond, which is indicative of strong covalent bonding. However, at the same ELF value for B-O bond, the ELF attains local maximum at the O sites compared to B sites, reflecting the ionicity of B-O bond. From Bader charge analysis results listed in Table 2, the strong covalent nature of the C-C and B-C bonds in B2CxO were quantitatively revealed by the evidences of large charge densities at their bond critical points with negative Laplacian values. Especially for B2C5O, the charge density at C1-C2 bond critical point is 1.549 electrons/Å3 with a Laplacian value of −11.068, which is close to that of C-C bond in diamond35. However, compared to C-C and B-C bonds, the charge densities at B-O bond critical points are much smaller (0.678 ~ 0.703 electrons/Å3) and the corresponding Laplacian values are all positive, suggesting the intrinsic ionic bonding of B-O bonds in these compounds. We further found that the B → O charge transfer decreases from 1.533 e to 1.513 e with C concentration, resulting in weakened ionicity in B-O bond.

Figure 2. Calculated band structures and total DOSs of B2CxO at ambient pressure.

Figure 2

The dashed horizontal line is Fermi energy.

Figure 3. Calculated partial DOSs of B2CxO at ambient pressure.

Figure 3

The dashed vertical curve is Fermi energy.

Table 2. The bond length d (Å), electron density ( Inline graphic eÅ−3), and Laplacian value Inline graphic at the bonding critical point of B2CxO.

Compounds Bond d Inline graphic Inline graphic
tP4-B2CO B-C 1.572 1.256 −7.924
  B-O 1.665 0.675 6.973
B2C2O C-C 1.604 1.357 −7.663
  B-C 1.566 1.318 −7.855
  B-O 1.655 0.682 8.048
B2C3O C1-C2 1.585 1.456 −9.346
  B-C2 1.558 1.331 −7.915
  B-O 1.645 0.694 8.645
B2C5O C1-C2 1.568 1.549 −11.068
  C1-C3 1.575 1.478 −9.773
  B-C3 1.551 1.346 −8.097
  B-O 1.637 0.703 9.003
Diamond35 C-C 1.530 1.60 −15.24

For the tetragonal B2CxO phase, six independent elastic constants Cij were determined at GGA level36 from the stress of the strained structure with a small finite strain. The elastic stability, incompressibility, and rigidity of each tetragonal B2CxO compound are thus studied based on the calculated elastic constants and derived Hill elastic moduli37, as listed in Table 3. Firstly, one can see that the mechanical stabilities of three B2CxO compounds satisfy the Born-Huang criterion for a tetragonal crystal38 [C11 > 0, C33 > 0, C44 > 0, C66 > 0, C11C12 > 0, C11 + C33 − 2C13 > 0, 2(C11 + C12) + C33 + 4C13 > 0], indicating that they are mechanically stable at ambient pressure. For B2C5O, we find its unusually high incompressibility along a-direction, as demonstrated by the extremely large C11 value (889 GPa) which is slightly larger than experimental data of c-BN (C11: 820 GPa)39 and is comparable to that of known superhard diamond (C11: 1076 GPa)40. Secondly, our calculated elastic parameters for tP4-B2CO are in a good accordant with the previous theoretical results21 using the same exchange-correlation functionals: local density approximation (LDA)41. Moreover, the calculated Hill bulk moduli agree well with those directly obtained from the fitting of the Birch-Murnaghan EOS (see Table 1), which further demonstrates the accuracy of our elastic constants calculations for three B2CxO compounds. Thirdly, a parallel increasement of elastic moduli and a reduction of Poisson’s ratios can be clearly revealed with increasing carbon contents, as shown in Table 3. Since the hardness is deduced from the size of the indentation after deformation, a hard material typically requires a high bulk modulus to support the volume decrease created by the applied pressure, and a low Poisson’s ratio (ν) or high shear modulus (so that the material will not deform in a direction different from the applied load)42. Among these ternary compounds, the calculated bulk modulus for B2C3O and B2C5O is 322 GPa and 345 GPa, respectively, indicating their highly incompressible nature. According to Teter43, the shear modulus is a significantly better qualitative predictor of hardness than the bulk modulus, governing the indentation hardness. The shear moduli of B2C3O and B2C5O are 302 and 351 GPa, and they are expected to withstand shear strain to a large extent. In view of the large bulk and shear moduli of these B2CxO compounds, the hardness calculations are of great interest. By using three different hardness models proposed by Gao et al.44, Chen et al.45, and Šimůnek et al.46, the theoretical hardness of these B2CxO phases were estimated and listed in Table 4. One can see that our calculated theoretical hardness for tP4-B2CO is in excellent with previous result performed by Li et al.21 using the Gao’s model. For other new predicted B2C2O, B2C3O, and B2C5O phase, the calculated theoretical hardness is in the range of 43~57GPa, 47~62GPa, and 51~68 GPa, respectively, suggesting their potential superhard nature.

Table 3. Calculated single elastic constant C ij (GPa), Bulk modulus B (GPa), Young’s E (GPa), Shear modulus G (GPa), and Poisson’s ratio ν for B2CxO, together with experimental data for c-BN and diamond.

Compounds Source Method C11 C33 C44 C66 C12 C13 B G E ν
tP4-B2CO Ref. 21 LDA 736 591 240 254 53 157 311 254   0.18
  This work LDA 755 593 253 256 42 163 316 265 617 0.17
    GGA 687 550 133 243 44 133 282 197 480 0.22
B2C2O This work GGA 763 590 229 274 15 135 299 264 611 0.16
B2C3O This work GGA 808 664 283 299 32 183 322 302 690 0.14
B2C5O This work GGA 889 740 346 335 30 135 345 351 787 0.12
c-BN Ref. 39 Exp. 820   480   190   400      
Diamond Ref. 40 Exp. 1076   577   125   442      

Table 4. Calculated hardness H v (GPa) for each B2CxO compound by using different theoretical models.

Compounds Source Hv Gao HvChen HvŠimůnek
tP4-B2CO Ref. 21 50    
  This work 51 40 38
B2C2O This work 57 42 43
B2C3O This work 62 49 47
B2C5O This work 68 60 51

The elastic anisotropy of crystal can exert great effects on the properties of physical mechanism, such as anisotropic plastic deformation, crack behavior, and elastic instability. Therefore, the elastic anisotropies of tetragonal B2CxO compounds were systematically studied for their further engineering applications. We here calculated the orientation dependences of the Young’s modulus E and shear modulus G. For each tetragonal B2CxO phase, the Young’s modulus E is described by the following equation47:

graphic file with name srep15481-m4.jpg

where α, β, and γ are the direction cosines which determine the angles between the a-, b-, and c-axis of a crystal and a given direction [uvw]. And s11, s33, s44, s66, s12, and s13 are the elastic compliance constants which are given by Kelly et al.48 Similarly, the orientation dependence of the shear modulus for arbitrary shear plane (hkl) and shear directions [uvw] is given by:

graphic file with name srep15481-m5.jpg

where (α1, β1, γ1) and (α2, β2, γ2) are the direction cosines of the [uvw] and [HKL] directions, and the [HKL] denotes the vector normal to the (hkl) shear plane. In Fig. 4, the distance from the origin of system of coordinate to this surface equals to the Young’s modulus in a given direction. For a perfectly isotropic medium this three-dimensional surface should be a sphere, however, all these B2CxO compounds exhibit a well-pronounced anisotropy in Fig. 4. In more detail, Fig. 5 presents the orientation dependences of Young’s modulus E along tensile axes within (001), (100), and Inline graphic specific planes. One can see that (1): the maximum values of tP4-B2CO (655 GPa), B2C2O (732 GPa), B2C3O (757 GPa), and B2C5O (864 GPa) are all along the [100] directions, and the minimum value of tP4-B2CO (379 GPa), B2C2O (543 GPa), B2C3O (584 GPa), and B2C5O (734 GPa) is along [111], [111], [001], and [001] directions, respectively; (2) the value of Emax/Emin for tP4-B2CO, B2C2O, B2C3O, and B2C5O is 1.73, 1.35, 1.30, and 1.18, respectively; and (3) the variations of the Young’s moduli for B2C3O and B2C5O along different directions decrease in the same following sequence: E[100] > E[011] > E[110] > E[111] > E[001]. As plotted in Fig. 6, the orientation dependence ofthe shear modulus G of each B2CxO compound was also calculated for shear on (001), (100), and Inline graphic planes, respectively. Firstly, the shear moduli of the B2CxO compounds are all independent of the shear directions from [100] to [010] directions within their (001) basal plane, which is a result of the isotropy of elasticity in the basal plane for tetragonal crystal. Secondly, except for B2C5O, the smallest shear moduli for other B2CxO members are all distributed within (001) basal plane. Thirdly, compared to other B2CxO compounds, B2C5O possesses the lowest degree of anisotropy within (001), (100), and Inline graphic shear planes.

Figure 4. Three-dimensional surface representations of the Young’s Modulus E.

Figure 4

(a) tP4-B2CO, (b) B2C2O, (c) B2C3O, and (d) B2C5O.

Figure 5. Orientation dependences of the Young’s modulus E.

Figure 5

(a) tP4-B2CO, (b) B2C2O, (c) B2C3O, and (d) B2C5O.

Figure 6. Orientation dependences of the Shear modulus G.

Figure 6

(a) tP4-B2CO, (b) B2C2O, (c) B2C3O, and (d) B2C5O.

Recently, a well-defined approach49,50 to understand the structural deformation, strength, and hardness have been extensively applied to strong solids under specified loading strains51,52,53,54. It is the ideal strength of a material which is defined as the stress at which a perfect crystal becomes mechanically unstable, that sets an upper bound for material strength. Studies of the strain-stress relations and the underlying atomistic bond-breaking processes can provide critical insights into the atomistic mechanism for the structural deformation and failure modes. Figure 7 presents the calculated strain-stress relations for these four B2CxO compounds under tensile strains in four principal symmetry crystallographic directions. It can be seen that these B2CxO compounds have strong stress responses in the < 100 > , < 001 > , and < 110 > directions with peak tensile stresses above 50 GPa. Especially in < 110 > directions, the peak tensile stresses of these compounds (tP4-B2CO: 137.4 GPa, B2C2O: 139.3 GPa, B2C3O: 148.3 GPa, and B2C5O: 161.8 GPa) are all higher than those of diamond (126.3 GPa) and c-BN (94 GPa) in the same directions51. However, compared to diamond (96.3 GPa) and c-BN (70.5 GPa) in the < 111 > directions51, these B2CxO possesses much lower peak tensile stresses of 6.1 GPa, 21.3 GPa, 22.4 GPa, and 25.1 GPa, respectively, showing their much weaker tensile resistance or potential superhardness. This result is consistent with their body-diagonal alignment of the weak B-O bonds. One can see that an additional 37.3 wt% of carbon content in B2C5O over that in B2CO leads to 75.7% of enhancement to its ideal tensile strength. However, even with this large increase the ideal tensile strength of B2C5O is still below those of diamond and c-BN. The weakest peak tensile stress occurs in the < 111 > directions, which indicates that under tensile loadings, these B2CxO compounds would first cleave in the (111) plane. The critical shear stresses in these compounds are then calculated by applying Inline graphicInline graphic and Inline graphic shear deformations in the (111) easy cleavage plane perpendicular to the weakest tensile direction. As shown in Fig. 8, for each B2CxO compound along (111) Inline graphic shear direction, the lowest ideal shear strength is determined to be 2.6 GPa, 11.1 GPa, 11.4 GPa, and 16.3 GPa, which is lower than that of the lowest tensile strength, respectively. This means that the failure mode in each B2CxO phase is dominated by the shear type. Since indentation hardness measurements produce volume and shape changes beneath the indenter, it is expected that shear strength is more closely related to the intrinsic hardness of a material. In fact, it has been shown that the limit of the structural stability is correlated with the maximum shear strength42. The present ideal shear strength calculations indicate that these B2CxO members are likely not to be superhard materials despite their increased C content. Take B2C5O for example, we next explore the atomistic structural deformation mode along (111) Inline graphic shear direction to understand this result. Figure 9 shows the lengths of the B-O bonds in B2C5O that connect the shear planes as a function of strain, and the structural snapshots of the unit cell at the critical steps near the bond-breaking points are also plotted. In Fig. 9, the equivalent B-O lengths (1.637 Å at equilibrium state) are stretched and split into four nonequivalence B-O lengths denoted as d1, d2, d3, and d4 under shear loadings. The bond lengths of d2 and d3 decrease nearly synchronously at each strain. On the contrary, d1 and d4 increase conformably with increasing strains and d1 break at the critical shear strain of 0.056, and d4 then decreases abruptly along with the breaking of d1 bonds. Such a bond-breaking can also be seen from the selected crystal structures (at shear strains of γ1, γ2, γ3, and γ4) before and after shear instability. Therefore, the origin of the lattice instability of B2C5O under large shear strain at the atomic level during shear deformation can be attributed to the breaking of weak ionic B-O bonds, and this is also the case for other B2CxO members. According to the results discussed above, the increased number of stronger sp3 C-C bonds indeed contribute to larger elastic moduli, hardness, and idea strengths to these ternary B2CxO compounds isoelectronic with diamond. However, because of their significantly lower ideal shear strengths originated from weak B-O bonds than those of superhard diamond and c-BN, all these B2CxO compounds may not be intrinsically superhard.

Figure 7. Calculated tensile stress-strain relations.

Figure 7

(a) tP4-B2CO, (b) B2C2O, (c) B2C3O, and (d) B2C5O.

Figure 8. Calculated shear stress-strain relations.

Figure 8

(a) tP4-B2CO, (b) B2C2O, (c) B2C3O, and (d) B2C5O.

Figure 9. Calculated shear stress-strain relations and the corresponding bond lengths under along (111) Inline graphic shear strain for B2C5O.

Figure 9

The detailed atomistic structural deformation modes were also shown.

Conclusion

In summary, we have systematically explored the crystal structures and properties of ternary B2CxO (x ≥ 2) compounds at ambient conditions by using unbiased structure searching techniques in combination with first-principles calculations. Three novel tetragonal diamond-like structure with group symmetry I41/amd, I-4m2, and P-4m2 for B2C2O, B2C3O, and B2C5O is uncovered, respectively. They are all dynamically stable and can be synthesized at ambient conditions according to the phonon dispersions and formation enthalpies calculations. The elastic anisotropy of each B2CxO phase has been demonstrated by the distributions of Young’s and shear moduli along different crystal orientations. A good relation between the mechanical behavior and carbon concentration of B2CxO was established by detailed evaluating the variations of the crystal configurations, electronic structures, and mechanical properties. The present results suggest that the high carbon content benefits that the formation of the covalent sp3 C-C polyhedral stacking structure and contributes to larger elastic moduli and hardness. The ideal strength calculations, however, indicate that all these B2CxO compounds may not be intrinsically superhard due to their significantly lower ideal shear strengths than those of diamond and c-BN, originated from weak B-O bonds.

Methods

The crystal structure searches were performed based on a global minimization of energy surfaces merging ab initio total-energy calculations as implemented in CALYPSO code23,24. CALYPSO code was designed to predict stable or metastable crystal structures requiring only chemical compositions of a given compound at given external conditions (e.g., pressure). Here, using the CALYPSO code in combined with Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)55, variable cell structure searches for each B2CxO (x = 2, 3, 5) compound containing 1–4 f.u. in the simulation cell were systematically performed at ambient pressure. During the structure searchs, the 60% structures of each generation with lower enthalpies were selected to generate the structures for the next generation by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) operation, and the other structures in new generation were randomly generated to increase the structural diversity. The underlying structure relaxations and electronic calculations were carried out using density functional theory with all-electron projector-augmented wave (PAW) method56 to describe the electron-ion interactions, as implemented in the VASP code. The exchange-correlation functional was treated by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)36 using functional of Perdew Burke Ernzerhof (PBE)57. The electronic wave functions were expanded in a plane-wave basis set with cutoff energy of 600 eV, and the Brillouin zone integration was employed using Monkhorst-Pack k point meshes58 with a grid of 0.03 Å−1 for all cases to ensure the total energies converged to be better than ~1 meV/atom. The phonon frequencies were calculated by the direct supercell approach, which uses the forces obtained by the Hellmann-Feynaman theorem calculated from the optimized supercell59. The strain-stress method60 was used in calculating the single elastic constants. A set of given strains with a finite variation between −0.01 and + 0.01 were applied on the optimized structure and the atomic position was fully optimized. Then, the elastic constants were obtained from the stress of the strained structure. The polycrystalline bulk modulus and shear modulus were thus derived from the Voigt-Reuss-Hill averaging scheme61. The quasistatic ideal strength is calculated by incrementally deforming the modeled cell in the direction of the applied strain and controlling the specific strain components, and simultaneously relaxing both the other strain components, as well as the atoms inside the unit cell, at each step.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhang, M. et al. Influences of carbon concentration on crystal structures and ideal strengths of B2CxO compounds in the B-C-O system. Sci. Rep. 5, 15481; doi: 10.1038/srep15481 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep15481-s1.pdf (352KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11204007) and Natural Science Basic Research plan in Shaanxi Province of China (no. 2012JQ1005).

Footnotes

Author Contributions M.G.Z. initiated the project; M.G.Z., H.Y.Y. and B.B.Z. performed theoretical calculations; M.G.Z., H.Y.Y., B.B.Z. and Q.W. analyzed results and wrote the manuscript text.

References

  1. Tian Y. J., Zhao Z. S. & Xu B. Microscopic theory of hardness and design of novel superhard crystals. Int. J. Refract Met. H . 33, 93–106 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  2. Li Q., Wang H. & Ma Y. M. Predicting new superhard phases. J. Superhard Mater . 32, 192–204 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Kurakevych O. O. Superhard phases of simple substances and binary compounds of the BCNO system: from diamond to the latest results. J. Superhard Mater . 31, 139–157 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao Y. S. et al. Superhard B-C-N materials synthesized in nanostructured bulks. J. Mater. Res. 17, 3139–3145 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  5. Solozhenko V. L., Andrault D., Fiquet G., Mezouar M. & Rubie D. C. Synthesis of superhard cubic BC2N. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1385–1387 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  6. He J. L. et al. Orthorhombic B2CN crystal synthesized by high pressure and temperature. Chem. Phys. Lett. 340, 431–436 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  7. Komatsu T., Nomura M., Kakudate Y. & Fujiwara S. Synthesis and characterization of a shock-synthesized cubic B-C-N solid solution of composition BC2.5N. J. Mater. Chem. 6, 1799–1803 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  8. Nakano S., Akaishi M., Sasaki T. & Yamaoka S. Segregative crystallization of several diamond-like phases from the graphitic BC2N without an additive at 7.7 GPa. Chem. Mater. 6, 2246–2251 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  9. Knittle E., Kaner R. B., Jeanloz R. & Cohen M. L. High-pressure synthesis, characterization, and equation of state of cubic C-BN solid solutions. Phys. Rev. B 51, 12149 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Solozhenko V. L., Kurakevych O. O., Andrault D., Le Godec Y. & Mezouar M. Ultimate metastable solubility of boron in diamond: synthesis of superhard diamondlike BC5. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 015506 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zinin P. V. et al. Phase transition in BCx system under high-pressure and high-temperature: Synthesis of cubic dense BC3 nanostructured phase. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 114905 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. Solozhenko V. L., Kurakevych O. O. & Oganov A. R. On the hardness of a new boron phase, orthorhombic γ-B28. J. Superhard Mater . 30, 428–429 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  13. He D. W. et al. Boron suboxide: as hard as cubic boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 643–645 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  14. Endo T., Sato T. & Shimada M. High-pressure synthesis of B2O with diamond-like structure. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 6, 683–685 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  15. Solozhenko V. L., Kurakevych O. O., Turkevich V. Z. & Turkevich D. V. Phase diagram of the B-B2O3 system at 5 GPa: Experimental and theoretical studies. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 6683–6687 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhogolev D. A., Bugaets O. P. & Marushko I. A. Compounds isoelectronic with diamond as a basis for the creation of new hard and superhard materials. J. Struct. Chem . 22, 33–38 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang X. X. et al. First-principles structural design of superhard materials. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 114101 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lyakhov A. O. & Oganov A. R. Evolutionary search for superhard materials: Methodology and applications to forms of carbon and TiO2. Phys. Rev. B 84, 092103 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  19. Gladkaya I. S., Dyuzheva T. I., Ekimov E. A., Nikolaev N. A. & Bendeliani N. A. Crystal growth at high pressure and the problem of characterization of the interstitial phases in the B-C-O system. J. Alloys Compd. 329, 153–156 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  20. Bolotina N. B., Dyuzheva T. I. & Bendeliani N. A. Atomic structure of boron suboxycarbide B(C,O)0.155. Crystallogr. Rep. 46, 809–815 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  21. Li Y. W., Li Q. & Ma Y. M. B2CO: A potential superhard material in the B-C-O system. Europhys. Lett. 95, 66006 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. Li Z. P., Gao F. M. & Xu Z. M. A pseudo-tetragonal phase of superhard B8C16(N6CO). Comp. Mater. Sci . 62, 55–59 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang Y. C., Lv J., Zhu L. & Ma Y. M. Crystal structure prediction via particle swarm optimization. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094116 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang Y. C., Lv J., Zhu L. & Ma Y. M. CALYPSO: A method for crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2063–2070 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Li Q. et al. Superhard monoclinic polymorph of carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 175506 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lv J., Wang Y. C., Zhu L. & Ma Y. M. Predicted novel high-pressure phases of lithium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 015503 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu L. et al. Substitutional alloy of Bi and Te at high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 145501 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li Q., Zhou D., Zheng W. T., Ma Y. M. & Chen C. F. Global structural optimization of tungsten borides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 115501 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang M. et al. Superhard BC3 in cubic diamond structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 015502 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Birch F. Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Phys. Rev . 71, 809–824 (1947). [Google Scholar]
  31. Decke B. F. & Kaspe J. S. The crystal structure of a simple orthorhombic form boron. Acta Cryst . 12, 503–506 (1959). [Google Scholar]
  32. Freiman Y. A. & Jodl H. J. Solid oxygen. Physics Reports 401, 1–228 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  33. Becke A. D. & Edgecombe K. E. A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397–5403 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  34. Bader R. F. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 91, 893–928 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  35. Yu R., Zhan Q. & Zhang X. F. Elastic stability and electronic structure of pyrite type PtN2: A hard semiconductor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 051913 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  36. Perdew J. P. et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B. 46, 6671–6687 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hill R. The elastic behavior of a crystalline aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc . A65, 349–354 (1952). [Google Scholar]
  38. Born M. & Huang K. Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices (Clarendon, Oxford, 1956). [Google Scholar]
  39. Grimsditch M., Zouboulis E. S. & Polian A. Elastic constants of boron nitride. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 832–834 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  40. Grimsditch M. H. & Ramdas A. K. Brillouin scattering in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 11, 3139–3148 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  41. Ceperley D. M. & Alder B. J. Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang Y., Sun H. & Chen C. F. Influence of carbon content on the strength of cubic BCxN: A first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 77, 094102 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  43. Teter D. M. Computational alchemy: the search for new superhard materials. Mater. Res. Sci. Bull . 23, 22–27 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  44. Gao F. M. Hardness of covalent crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 015502 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen X. Q., Niu H. Y., Li D. Z. & Li Y. Y. Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics 19, 1275–1281 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  46. Šimůnek A. & Vackář J. Hardness of covalent and ionic crystal: first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 085501 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. He Y., Schwarz R. B., Migliori A. & Whang S. H. Elastic constants of single crystal γ-TiAl. J. Mater. Res. 10, 1187–1195 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  48. Kelly A. & Macmillan N. H. Strong Solids (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986). [Google Scholar]
  49. Roundy D., Krenn C. R., Cohen M. L. & Morris J. W. Jr Ideal shear strengths of fcc aluminum and copper. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2713(1999). [Google Scholar]
  50. Roundy D., Krenn C. R., Cohen M. L. & Morris J. W. Jr The ideal strength of tungsten. Philos. Mag. A 81, 1725–1747 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang Y., Sun H. & Chen C. F. Superhard cubic BC2N compared to diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 195504 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Y., Sun H. & Chen C. F. Atomistic deformation modes in strong covalent solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 145505 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang Y., Sun H. & Chen C. F. Structural deformation, strength, and instability of cubic BN compared to diamond: A first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 73, 144115 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang R. F. et al. Stability and strength of transition-metal tetraborides and triborides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 255502 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kresse G. & Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 54, 11169–11186 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kresse G. & Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  57. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Monkhorst H. J. & Pack J. D. Special points for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  59. Togo A., Oba F. & Tanaka I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  60. Milman V. & Warren M. C. Elasticity of hexagonal BeO. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter . 13, 241–251 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  61. Hill R. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. A65, 349 (1952). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep15481-s1.pdf (352KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES