Abstract
Bioactive mesoporous diopside (m-DP) and poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) composite scaffolds with mesoporous/macroporous structure were prepared by the solution-casting and particulate-leaching method. The results demonstrated that the degradability and bioactivity of the mesoporous/macroporous scaffolds were significantly improved by incorporating m-DP into PLLA, and that the improvement was m-DP content-dependent. In addition, the scaffolds containing m-DP showed the ability to neutralize acidic degradation products and prevent the pH from dropping in the solution during the soaking period. Moreover, the scaffolds containing m-DP enhanced attachment, proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity of MC3T3-E1 cells, which were also m-DP content-dependent. Furthermore, the histological and immunohistochemical analysis results showed that the scaffolds with m-DP significantly promoted new bone formation and improved the materials degraded in vivo, indicating good biocompatibility. The results suggested that the mesoporous/macroporous scaffolds of the m-DP/PLLA composite with osteogenesis had a potential for bone regeneration.
Keywords: mesoporous diopside, biocomposite, mesoporous/macroporous scaffolds, degradability, osteogenesis
1. Introduction
The diopside (DP) bioceramics have been reported to be degradable and have the ability to induce apatite formation on their surfaces in simulated body fluid (SBF), and supported human osteoblastic-like cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation [1,2]. The silicate ceramics in CaO–SiO2–MgO systems have been reported to produce some ions (such as Ca, Mg and Si) that could stimulate osteoblast proliferation and differentiation [3,4]. Another study has reported that the DP ceramics could be used not only for bone tissue engineering but also for periodontal tissue engineering owing to their excellent in vitro and in vivo osteogeneis/cementogenesis [5,6].
A nanostructured diopside (n-DP) was coated on AZ91 magnesium alloy through combined micro-arc oxidation and electrophoretic deposition methods, and the results showed that the n-DP coating increased the corrosion resistance and improved the in vitro bioactivity of the biodegradable magnesium alloy [7,8]. In addition, the n-DP coating on magnesium implants significantly enhanced cell viability and new bone formation compared with the uncoated magnesium implants [7,8]. Moreover, well-ordered mesoporous diopside (m-DP) with a mesopore size of 4 nm was synthesized by the template technique, and the results revealed that the m-DP with large surface area/high pore volume not only improved hydrophilicity, in vitro bioactivity and degradability of DP, but also possessed good haemostatic properties, and could be applied as a haemostatic agent for surgical haemostasis [9].
Biodegradable polyesters, such as poly(l-lactide) (PLLA), polyglycolic acid and their copolymers, have been widely applied for bone regeneration owing to their degradability, biocompatibility and processability [10–12]. However, there are still some problems that need to be solved for PLLA application in the biomedical field, such as the hydrophobicity, lack of bioactivity and the release of acidic degradation by-products, which might cause inflammation when implanted in vivo [13,14]. It is well known that inorganic bioactive materials, such as hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, bioglasses and calcium silicate, have been incorporated into degradable polymers to develop inorganic/organic biocomposites [15,16]. The combination of bioactive materials with degradable polymers would lead to polymer-based composites with improved physico-chemical and biological properties when compared with polymers alone [17].
To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported the preparation of m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds with a mesoporous/macroporous structure for bone regeneration applications. We expected that m-DP with high specific surface area/pore volume incorporated into PLLA would improve the physico-chemical and biological properties of the composite scaffolds. Therefore, in this study, the m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds were fabricated, and the in vitro degradability, bioactivity, cellular responses and in vivo osteogenesis of the scaffolds were investigated.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Preparation of mesoporous diopside and scaffolds
A total of 4.0 g of P123 (EO20PO70EO20, 5800) was dissolved in hydrochloric acid solution (120 ml), which was stirred at room temperature until clear. Then, 4.8 g magnesium nitrate hexahydrate and 5.2 g calcium nitrate tetrahydrate were put into the solution, followed by the dropwise addition of 8.5 g of tetraethyl orthosilicate and magnetic stirring at 50°C for 5 h and at 80°C for the next 24 h. The acquired white suspension was washed thoroughly with deionized water, and then dried at 80°C under vacuum to obtain the powders. Finally, the powders were calcined at 600°C for 6 h at a heating rate of 1°C min−1 to remove the template, and the m-DP was obtained. The morphology and microstructure of m-DP were observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM2010; JEOL, Japan) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S-3400N; Hitachi, Japan).
The PLLA (4032D) was purchased from Nature Works LLc (USA), and the scaffolds of PLLA and m-DP/PLA composites with 20 wt% (C20) and 40 wt% m-DP (C40) content were prepared by the solution-casting and particulate-leaching method. Briefly, PLLA particles were dissolved in dichloromethane, and m-DP powders were added into the PLLA solution. Afterwards, sodium chloride particles, sieved with diameter of 400–500 µm, were mixed into the compound after uniform stirring. The samples were consolidated in a stainless steel mould (Φ12 × 2 mm and Φ6 × 6 mm) under a pressure of 2 MPa for 2 min. After soaking in the deionized water for 48 h, the scaffolds were obtained (refreshing the deionized water every 12 h), then the scaffolds were dried in an oven at 37°C for 48 h for further use. The surface morphology of the scaffolds was observed by SEM (S-3400N; Hitachi, Japan).
2.2. In vitro degradation of scaffolds
The scaffolds (Φ12 × 2 mm), weighed as W0, were placed in sealed polyethylene bottles, which were then filled with tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane–HCl-buffered saline (Tris–HCl pH = 7.40) with a solid/liquid ratio of 0.2 g ml−1. The bottles were incubated in a shaking air bath at 37°C (100 r.p.m.) for 84 days, and the Tris–HCl solution was refreshed once a week. At specific time intervals (1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 63 and 84 days), the specimens were washed thoroughly with deionized water, then dried at 80°C in an oven for 12 h. The degradability of samples was determined by testing the weight loss according to the following equation:
where W0 is the starting dried weight and Wt is the dried weight at time t.
The pH value of the Tris–HCL solution containing the scaffolds was measured by pH meter (FE20 K; Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 63 and 84 days.
2.3. In vitro bioactivity of scaffolds in simulated body fluid
The in vitro bioactivity of the scaffolds (Φ12 × 2 mm) was determined by testing the apatite formation on the specimen surfaces after the samples had been immersed in SBF (pH = 7.40) at 37°C for 7 days. The surface morphology of the scaffolds was observed by SEM, and the surface composition was determined by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS; Falcon, USA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku Co., Japan) after the samples had been soaked in SBF for 7 days. The ion concentrations (Si, Ca, Mg ions) in the SBF were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES; IRIS 1000; Thermo Elemental, USA) after the scaffolds soaking into SBF at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days.
2.4. Cell culture on scaffolds
All the scaffolds of PLLA, C20 and C40 (Φ12 × 2 mm) were sonicated in ethanol and sterilized in an autoclave at 120°C for 30 min. The osteoblast-like cell line MC3T3-E1 (ATCC; Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) was cultured in a 37.5 cm2 flask with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with glutamine (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and containing 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum (Sijiqing, Hangzhou, China) and 1% (v/v) antibiotics under a 100% standard humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. The culture medium was replaced every 2 days. The trypsin–DETA solution (Gibco, 0.5 and 0.2 g l−1, respectively) was used to harvest cells before they reached confluence. The cells were resuspended in fresh culture medium before seeding on specimens.
2.4.1. Cell morphology
The MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on the scaffolds (Φ12 × 2 mm) in a 24-well plate at 37.5°C and under a 100% humidity atmosphere with 5% CO2. The cell seeding density was 1 × 104 cm−2. After the cells had been cultured for 1, 3 and 7 days, the specimens were washed gently three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove the unattached cells. Then, the cells that were adhered to the samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. After washing with PBS for three times, the cells on the scaffolds were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Sigma) and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma). The cell morphologies on the scaffolds at different time were visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Hitachi).
2.4.2. Cell proliferation
Cell proliferation was investigated by the CCK-8 assay. The MC3T3-E1 cells (1 × 104 cm−2) were seeded on the scaffolds (Φ12 × 2 mm) in 24-well plates, and cells were incubated for 1, 3 and 5 days under a humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO2. The solution was refreshed every 2 days. At each time point, a total of 450 µl DMEM and 50 µl of CCK-8 solution (Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) was added to each well and incubated for 3 h. After this incubation, 100 µl of the supernatant was transferred into a 96-well plate and read at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Synergy HT; Biotek, Winooski, VT) with 620 nm as the reference wavelength. The mean absorbance value/optical density (OD) obtained from the blank control was subtracted from the ODs of the test groups.
2.4.3. Alkaline phosphatase activity
The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of cell lysates at 7, 10 and 14 days of growth was measured with the ALP assay in osteogenic medium. Briefly, 1 × 104 of MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on the sample (PLLA, C20 and C40, Φ12 × 2 mm) in 24-well plates and then cultured at 37°C and 100% humidity atmosphere with 5% CO2. At a specific time point, the cell lysate was obtained by adding 1 ml of 0.2% Nonidet P-40 solution (NP-40) to each well at room temperature for 1 h. Then, 50 µl of 1 mg ml−1 p-nitrophenylphosphate (Sigma, USA) substrate solution (pH = 9), which contained 0.1 mol l−1 glycine and 0.5 mmol l−1 MgCl2 in 1 M diethanolamine buffer, was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by 100 µl of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide. Then, the OD value was quantified with a microplate reader (SPECTR Amax 384, Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The ALP activity was expressed as the OD value per total protein. The total protein content was determined using the BCA protein assay kits and a series of bovine serum albumin standards. ALP activity of cell lysates was normalized to the total protein content of each lysate.
2.5. Animal experiments
This animal model study was approved by the Research Center for Laboratory Animals of the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Twenty-four healthy New Zealand white rabbits (male, about 2.0 kg) were chosen for surgery. The rabbits were anaesthetized with pentobarbital sodium. The incision sites were made on the left leg of the rabbits, and then 6 mm radial defects were introduced in the thighbone of the rabbits. The scaffolds (Φ 6 × 6 mm) were placed in these defects. Penicillin (4000 units per body) and streptomycin (200 mg per body) were administered subcutaneously for prevention of infection. At 4, 8 and 12 weeks after implantation, rabbits were sacrificed with 3 ml intravenous pentobarbital solution. The thighbones were taken out and placed into 4% neutral-buffered formalin.
2.5.1. Micro-computed tomography
To evaluate the process of bone defects repaired by the scaffolds (Φ6 × 6 mm), µCT measurements were performed at beamline BL13 W of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Shanghai, China) using a monochromatic beam with an energy of 30 keV and a distance (sample-to-detector) of 1.5 m. In this study, a 4000 × 2500 CCD detector with the pixel size set to 6 µm was used to record images. A total of 1500 projections within an angular range of 180° were taken, and the exposure time amounted to 8 s per projection. The obtained isotropic slice data were reconstructed into two-dimensional images and these two-dimensional images were compiled to build three-dimensional models in CTan (Skyscan). The three-dimensional structure was reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm. The images were finally converted into an 8-bit data format, proportional to the measured attenuation coefficients of the voxels.
2.5.2. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation
After µCT scanning, samples (Φ6 × 6 mm) were decalcified in 10% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (pH = 7.0) for about 30 days at room temperature, then the samples washed with double-distilled water gently, dehydrated in ascending grades of alcohol and embedded in paraffin. A microtome was used to obtain 20 µm thick serial sections of all samples, which were then frozen at −20°C. All sections were stained with haematoxylin/eosin (H&E) or Masson's trichrome. The newly formed bone was observed under a light microscope (TE2000U; Nikon, Japan). The ratios of mature bone and residual material was calculated according to the following equation:
and
The decalcified sections were deparaffinized and incubated with primary antibodies against bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2; 1 : 25 dilution; Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, UK) to identify osteogenesis before applying fluorescent donkey polyclonal second antibody IgG (diluted 1 : 200; Invitrogen) for 30 min at room temperature. Thereafter, the sections were washed three times with PBS (0.01 mol l−1, pH = 7.4) for about 5 min each time. The slides were then examined microscopically (TE2000U; Nikon, Japan). The ratio of positive expression was calculated according to the following equation:
![]() |
2.6. Statistical analysis
All quantitative data expressed as the mean ± s.d. were analysed with Origin v. 8.0 (Originlab Corporation, USA). Statistical comparisons were carried out using analyses of variance. Statistical significance was attained with a greater than 95% confidence level (p < 0.05).
3. Results
3.1. Morphology of mesoporous diopside and scaffolds
Figure 1a presents TEM images of the morphology of m-DP. It can be seen that the m-DP had highly ordered mesopores with a pore size of about 5 nm [18]. Figure 1b shows SEM images of the morphology of m-DP. The m-DP consisted of rod-like particles with a size of around 5 µm.
Figure 1.

TEM and SEM images of mesoporous diopside (m-DP).
Figure 2 presents the SEM images of the surface morphology and microstructure of the fabricated PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds under different magnifications. It can be seen that all the scaffolds exhibited macroporous structure with a macropore size of around 400 µm. The results show the m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds with mesoporous/macroporous structure that were prepared in this study.
Figure 2.

SEM images of the surface morphology of PLLA (a,b), C20 (c,d) and C40 (e,f) scaffolds at different magnifications.
3.2. Scaffold degradation in Tris–HCl solution
Figure 3a shows weight loss of the PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds after they were soaked in Tris–HCl solution for different times. It was found that weight loss of all the samples increased with time, and the weight loss of the C40 scaffolds was 39 wt% after immersion in Tris–HCl solution for 84 days, which was significantly higher than C20, which had a weight loss of 17 wt%, and PLLA scaffolds, which had a weight loss of 8 wt%. The results indicated that the degradability of the scaffolds increased with the rise of m-DP content.
Figure 3.

(a) Weight loss of PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds with time. (b) Change in pH value of the solution after immersion of PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds in Tris–HCl solution with time. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3b shows the change in pH value of the solution with time after the PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been soaked in the Tris–HCl solution. For PLLA, the pH of the solution decreased from the initial value of 7.40–6.15 during the whole soaking time. For C20 scaffolds, the pH decreased from 7.40 to 6.80. However, for C40 scaffolds, the pH increased from 7.40 to 7.85.
3.3. Apatite formation on scaffolds in simulated body fluid
Figure 4 shows the SEM images of the surface morphology of PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds at different magnifications after being soaked in SBF for 7 days. It is hard to see the apatite formation on the PLLA surface. Nevertheless, the surfaces of both the C20 and C40 scaffolds were covered by spherical-shaped apatite. In addition, there was obviously much more apatite on the C40 scaffolds than there was on the C20 scaffolds. The results indicate that incorporation of m-DP into PLLA could enhance the apatite formation (bioactivity) ability of the scaffolds, which was dependent on the m-DP content.
Figure 4.

SEM images of surface morphology of PLLA (a,b), C20 (c,d) and C40 (e,f) scaffolds at different magnifications after being soaked in SBF for 7 days.
Figure 5 shows the EDS of the surfaces of the C40 scaffolds before and after being soaked in SBF for 7 days. The results indicate that P peaks appeared in figure 5b, which did not exist in figure 5a, and the Ca peaks became higher after the scaffolds were soaked in SBF, indicating that apatite could form on the C40 scaffolds. The EDS results were consistent with SEM.
Figure 5.

EDS of C40 scaffolds before (a) and after (b) being soaked in SBF for 7 days. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 6 presents the XRD of the C40 scaffolds before (a) and after (b) being soaked in SBF for 7 days. The diffraction peaks at approximately 2θ = 25.9°, 31.8°, 40° and 46.7° are attributed to the characteristic peaks of apatite on the surface of the scaffolds.
Figure 6.

XRD of C40 scaffolds before (a) and after (b) being soaked in SBF for 7 days; asterisks indicate the peaks of apatite.
Figure 7 shows the changes in concentration of P, Ca, Si and Mg ions in solution after the C40 scaffolds were soaked in SBF for different periods of time. The Ca and Mg ion concentration increased around the first to second day, and then decreased up to 10 days. In addition, the Si ion concentration increased at a slow rate, whereas the P ion concentration gradually decreased during the whole soaking period.
Figure 7.

Changes of ion concentrations (P, a; Si, b; Mg, c; and Ca, d) in solution after the C40 scaffolds were immersed in SBF for different periods of time.
3.4. In vitro cytocompatibility
3.4.1. Cell morphology of scaffolds
Figure 8 shows the CLSM images of the cytoskeletons stained by FITC and DAPI after MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured on PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds for different numbers of days. It is obvious that the number of cells on the scaffolds increased with time, indicating good cytocompatibility of the scaffolds. Furthermore, it was found that the number of cells on the scaffolds increased with m-DP content.
Figure 8.
CLSM images of cytoskeletons stained by FITC and DAPI after being cultured on PLLA (a), C20 (b) and C40 (c) scaffolds for 1, 3 and 7 days.
3.4.2. Cell proliferation on scaffolds
Figure 9 shows the OD values of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds at 1, 3 and 5 days. It can be seen that the OD value for all the samples increased with time, indicating good cytocompatibility of the samples. At day 1, there was no obvious difference in OD value for all samples. However, the OD value for the C40 was significantly higher than C20 and PLLA scaffolds at days 3 and 5. Moreover, the OD value for the C20 was significantly higher than for the PLLA scaffolds at days 3 and 5.
Figure 9.

Cell proliferation on PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds by CCK-8 assay. Asterisk denotes p < 0.05.
3.4.3. Alkaline phosphatase activity of cells on scaffolds
Figure 10 shows the ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells cultivated on PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds after 7, 10 and 14 days. It was found that the ALP activity for C40 was significantly higher than that for the C20 and PLLA scaffolds after 10 days. Moreover, the ALP activity for C40 was significantly higher than that for the C20 scaffolds, and the ALP activity for C20 was obviously higher than that for the PLLA scaffolds. The results indicate that the ALP expression levels of the cells on the scaffolds increased with the rise of m-DP content.
Figure 10.

ALP activity of MC3TS-E1 cells on PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds at 7, 10 and 14 days.
3.5. New bone growth into scaffolds in rabbit femoral defects
Figure 11 shows the cross sections of three-dimensional µCT reconstruction images after PLLA (a), C20 (b) and C40 (c) scaffolds were implanted into rabbit femur bone defects for different periods of time. It was found that the new bone gradually grew into all the scaffolds, whereas the scaffolds degraded with time. It is easy to see that the C40 scaffold was the best for bone defect repair.
Figure 11.

Cross-section three-dimensional reconstruction images of SRµCT after implantation of PLLA (a), C20 (b) and C40 (c) scaffolds into bone defects in rabbit femur for 4, 8 and 12 weeks.
Figure 12a shows the histological sections of H&E staining of PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds 4, 8 and 12 weeks after implantation in vivo. It was found that the amount of new bone increased with increasing time and m-DP content in the scaffolds. In the meantime, the scaffolds reduced. At 12 weeks, a large quantity of new bone was found, and the mature bone was also found in C40 scaffolds. Figure 12b shows the quantitative analysis of mature bone, new bone and residual material by histological section after the scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for different times. It was found that the quantity of new bone and mature bone significantly increased with time and m-DP content in the scaffolds. During these time periods, the residual material gradually decreased.
Figure 12.
(a) Histological sections of H&E staining after PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for 4, 8 and 12 weeks (B, bone; M, material). (b) Quantitative comparison of the percentage of new bone formation by histological section after PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for 4, 8 and 12 weeks.
Figure 13a shows the Masson trichrome staining of the scaffolds 4, 8 and 12 weeks after implantation in vivo, which provided the supplementary information for the H&E staining. It was found that the amount of new bone also increased with time and m-DP content in the scaffolds. Meanwhile, the scaffolds gradually reduced. Figure 13b shows the quantitative analysis of mature bone, new bone and residual material by histological section (Masson trichrome staining) for different time periods after the scaffolds were implanted in vivo. It was found that the quantity of new bone and mature bone significantly increased with time and m-DP content while the residual material decreased. The Masson trichrome staining results were in accordance with H&E staining.
Figure 13.
(a) Histological sections of Masson trichrome staining after PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for 4, 8 and 12 weeks (MB, mature bone; NB, new bone; M, material). (b) Quantitative analysis of mature bone, new bone and residual material with time by histological section after PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for 4, 8 and 12 weeks.
3.6. Immunohistochemistry of new bone formation
Figure 14a shows the images of histological sections of immunohistochemical staining of BMP-2 for 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds were implanted in vivo. The figure shows that the BMP-2 staining intensity (brown) for all the scaffolds increased with implant time and m-DP content in the scaffolds. At 12 weeks, the BMP-2 staining intensity for C40 was obviously higher than that for the C20 and PLLA scaffolds.
Figure 14.
(a) Immunohistological analysis of positive expression of BMP-2 by histological sections after PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Brown (+) indicates positive expression of BMP. (b) Quantitative analysis of the positive expression by histological sections after PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds had been implanted in vivo for 4, 8 and 12 weeks.
Figure 14b shows the positive expression ratio of BMP-2 for PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds for different periods of time. It was found that the positive expression ratio for all the scaffolds increased with time and m-DP content in the scaffolds. The positive expression ratio of BMP-2 for the C40 scaffolds was 57%, which was higher than that for the C20 (39%) and PLLA scaffolds (18%) 12 weeks after implantation in vivo.
4. Discussion
In this study, m-DP, one of the magnesium-based biomaterials in the CaO–SiO2–MgO system, was synthesized and its composite scaffolds with PLLA were prepared by the solution-casting/particulate-leaching method. Our findings showed that the addition of m-DP into PLLA enhanced the degradability and bioactivity of the m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds, and the composite scaffolds could improve the cell proliferation and ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells, which were m-DP content-dependent. The composite scaffolds containing m-DP could neutralize the acidic degradation by-products released from the PLLA. Furthermore, the composite scaffolds with mesoporous/macroporous structure (macropore size of around 400 µm) obviously enhanced the new bone formation and promoted material degradation in vivo.
For bone regeneration applications, bioactive materials with different degradation rates are needed [19]. Moreover, the degradation rate of bone implants should synchronize with the growth of new bone tissue, and the implants could gradually be replaced by new bone tissue in vivo [20]. In this study, it was found that the weight loss of C40 scaffolds was 37 wt% after immersion in Tris–HCl for 84 days, which was higher than the weight loss of C20 scaffolds (17 wt%) and PLLA scaffolds (8 wt%), suggesting that C40 degraded faster than C20 and PLLA scaffolds. Obviously, addition of m-DP into PLLA improved the degradability of the scaffolds, and the degradation rate of the scaffolds increased with the rise in m-DP content. The m-DP with large surface area/high pore volume could enable more liquid to enter into the scaffolds, which might be responsible for enhancing the degradability of the scaffolds.
Some studies have reported that the acidic degradation by-products, released by the PLLA, would decrease the pH value, which might lead to inflammatory responses when implanted in vivo [21,22]. In this study, it was found that there was a gradually decrease in pH of the solution containing the PLLA, indicating that some acidic by-products were produced during the soaking. Furthermore, the pH of the solution for C20 scaffolds showed little decrease (from 7.40 to 6.80). However, the pH of the solution for C40 scaffolds slightly increased from the initial value of 7.40 to 7.85. The results suggest that composite scaffolds containing m-DP could improve the pH value of the solution. A possible explanation for this might be that the alkaline ions (Ca2+, Mg2+) from the m-DP in the scaffolds might neutralize the acidic degradation by-products of PLLA and thus compensate for the decrease in pH value. Therefore, the possible inflammation effects from the acidic degradation products of PLLA could be solved by development of m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds for bone-regeneration applications.
The ability to induce apatite in SBF, as well as the amount of apatite, determines the bioactivity of a biomaterial, and predicts the in vivo bone bioactivity. The bioactivity of the biomaterial is an essential role in the formation and maintenance of the tissue–biomaterial interface [23,24]. Previous studies found that DP bioceramics possessed apatite-forming ability in SBF and could closely bond to the bone tissue when implanted in vivo [1,2]. In this study, the C20 and C40 scaffolds could induce apatite formation on their surface, whereas no apatite was found on the PLLA scaffolds after soaking in SBF for 7 days, indicating that the composite scaffolds containing m-DP significantly improved the ability to form apatite, which was dependent on the m-DP content. The results indicate that the m-DP content might be one of the key factors which affected the dissolution of the m-DP in the scaffolds, following the nucleation and growth of apatite on the surfaces of the scaffolds in SBF.
Cell responses to a biomaterial, such as proliferation and differentiation, depend not only on surface morphology but also on the chemical composition of the biomaterials [25]. Previous studies have shown that DP bioceramics significantly stimulated the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of several kinds of stem cells [1,2]. In this study, it was found that the MC3T3-E1 cells could proliferate on the PLLA, C20 and C40 scaffolds, suggesting positive cellular responses to these materials, and indicating good cytocompatibility. Furthermore, the proliferation of cells on the scaffolds was obviously enhanced by the increase in m-DP content (C40 > C20 > PLLA), suggesting that incorporation of m-DP into the scaffolds could significantly improve cell proliferation. The composite scaffolds containing m-DP with huge specific surface area/high pore volume might provide a good opportunity for the interaction between the cells and substrates. Moreover, the surface chemical compositions play a crucial role in determining the cell responses by releasing Ca, Si and Mg ions from the composite scaffolds, facilitating cell proliferation.
ALP activity has been used as an early marker for functionality and differentiation of osteoblasts during in vitro experiments, and ALP activity of osteoblasts on the samples could reflect the influence of the material on the cells' ability to form new bone in vivo [26]. In this study, the results showed that the ALP activity of the MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on the scaffolds increased with time and m-DP content, indicating that the scaffolds with high m-DP content obviously improved the ALP activity of the cells. The results suggest that the m-DP content might be one of the key factors which promoted cell differentiation. Studies have shown that the ion-dissolution products containing Ca, Si and Mg from bioactive materials such as bioglass/ceramics could stimulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and gene expression [27–29]. In this study, Ca, Si and P ions were continuously released (dissolution) from the composite scaffolds (C40) into the solution during soaking in SBF, which produced a Ca-, Mg- and Si-rich environment that might be responsible for stimulating osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3 cells.
In order to investigate the in vivo osteogenesis and degradation of the scaffolds, the scaffolds were implanted into bone defects in rabbits. The results from histological and immunohistochemical analysis showed that the scaffolds with m-DP significantly promoted new bone formation in vivo, which was m-DP content-dependent. The degradation of biomaterials in vivo has been addressed in many studies, and chemical dissolution and cell-mediated resorption have been suggested [30]. In this study, it was found that the new bone tissue gradually grew into the macro/mesoporous scaffolds with time, accompanied by the degradation of the scaffolds. It might be that the chemical dissolution of a scaffold at an initial stage enlarged its surface area, which might facilitate cell-mediated resorption later. Moreover, the new bone area gradually increased, whereas the scaffolds continued to reduce, revealing that a cell-mediated resorption of composite scaffolds occurred. It is suggested that the macro/mesoporous scaffolds with special structure could promote the degradation of the scaffolds and osteogenesis.
Compared with PLLA scaffolds, it is likely that composite scaffolds containing m-DP with a large surface area/high pore volume might provide a suitable microenvironment for the interaction between cell/tissue and scaffolds, and thus enhance bone tissue growth into the scaffolds in vivo. In addition, the release of Si, Mg and Ca ions from the dissolution of the composite scaffolds produced a microenvironment which might be responsible for stimulating cell/new bone tissue ingrowth into the composite scaffolds. Moreover, m-DP with a large surface area/high pore volume in the scaffolds might enhance degradation of the scaffolds in vivo that promotes bone tissue regeneration. In conclusion, the m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds with good biocompatibility might have special biofunctions to stimulate bone tissue regeneration and repair bone defects.
5. Conclusion
The m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds with macro/mesoporous structure were prepared. The results showed that the addition of m-DP into PLLA enhanced the in vitro degradability and bioactivity of the composite scaffolds, which were m-DP content-dependent. Moreover, the scaffolds containing m-DP showed the ability to neutralize the acidic degradation by-products released from PLLA and could prevent the pH value of the solution from decreasing during the soaking period. In the cell culture experiments, the composite scaffolds were found to promote cell proliferation and enhanced the ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells, which were also m-DP content-dependent. In animal experiments, histological and immunohistological elevation results revealed that the m-DP/PLLA composite scaffolds with macro/mesoporous structure obviously enhanced new bone formation and promoted material degradation in vivo, indicating good biocompatibility. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of m-DP into PLLA was a useful approach to obtain biocomposite scaffolds with improved properties, which might be applied as biomedical materials for bone regeneration.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Zhaoying Wu, Xingtao Chen and Liang Cai for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Ethics
All participants gave informed consent prior to data collection. This animal models study was approved by the Research Center for Laboratory Animal of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Authors' contribution
Z.L.L. and J.W. wrote the paper and revised it. S.C.T., J.Q., Y.G.Y. and B.Y.Y. conceived and designed the study. Z.L.L. and J.J.J. performed the experiment and carried out the statistical analyses. J.C.S. performed the animal experiment and collected field data.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51173041,31271031), the National Science and Technology Support Plan Projects (no. 2012BAD32B01), the International Cooperation Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2013DFB50280), the Major International Joint Research Project between China and Korea (81461148033, 31311140253) and the Key Medical Programme of Science and Technology Development of Shanghai (12441902802).
References
- 1.Kumar JP, Lakshmi L, Jyothsna V, Balaji DR, Saravanan S, Moorthi A, Selvamurugan N. 2014. Synthesis and characterization of diopside particles and their suitability along with chitosan matrix for bone tissue engineering in vitro and in vivo. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 10, 970–981. ( 10.1166/jbn.2014.1808) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang MF, Liu CX, Sun JL, Zhang XH. 2011. Hydroxyapatite/diopside ceramic composites and their behaviour in simulated body fluid. Ceram. Int. 37, 2025–2029. ( 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.045) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Diba M, Goudouri OM, Tapia F, Boccaaaini RA. 2014. Magnesium-containing bioactive polycrystalline silicate-based ceramics and glass-ceramics for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Solid. St. M. 18, 147–167. ( 10.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lin KL, Xia LG, Li HY, Jiang XQ, Pan HB, Xu YJ, Lu WW, Zhang ZY, Chang J. 2013. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 34, 10 028–10 042. ( 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.056) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang YF, Li S, Wu CT. 2014. The in vitro and in vivo cementogenesis of CaMgSi2O6 bioceramic scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102, 105–116. ( 10.1002/jbm.a.34679) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu CT, Ramaswamy Y, Zreiqat H. 2010. Porous diopside (CaMgSi2O6) scaffold: a promising bioactive material for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 6, 2237–2245. ( 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Razavi M, Fathi MH, Savabi O, Beni BH, Razavi SM, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. 2014. Coating of biodegradable magnesium alloy bone implants using nanostructured diopside (CaMgSi2O6). Appl. Surf. Sci. 228, 130–137. ( 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.160) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Razavi M, Fathi MH, Savabi O, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. 2014. In vitro study of nanostructured diopside coating on Mg alloy orthopedic implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 313, 60–66. ( 10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.039) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wei J, Lu JX, Yan YG, Li H, Ma J, Wu XH, Dai CL, Liu CS. 2011. Preparation and characterization of well ordered mesoporous diopside nanobiomaterial. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 10 746–10 749. ( 10.1166/jnn.2011.3940) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhu AP, Zhang M, Wu J, Shen J. 2002. Covalent immobilization of chitosan/heparin complex with a photosensitive hetero-bifunctional crosslinking reagent on PLA surface. Biomaterials 23, 4657–4665. ( 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00215-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goswami J, Bhatnagar N, Mohanty S, Ghosh AK. 2013. Processing and characterization of poly(lactic acid) based bioactive composites for biomedical scaffold application. Express. Polym. Lett. 7, 767–777. ( 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.74) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jiang LY, Xiong CD, Chen DL, Jiang LX. 2012. Effect of n-HA with different surface-modified on the properties of n-HA/PLGA composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 259, 72–78. ( 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.091) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li H, Chang J. 2004. Preparation and characterization of bioactive and biodegradable Wollastonite/poly(d,l-lactic acid) composite scaffolds. J. Mater. Sci. 15, 1089–1095. ( 10.1023/b:jmsm.0000046390.09540.c2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chang H, Huang CC, Tsai HC, Imae T, Hong PD. 2012. Characterization and morphology analysis of degradable poly(l-lactide) film in in vitro gastric juice incubation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 262, 89–94. ( 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.087) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma X, Wang Y, Guo H, Wang JT. 2011. Nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan sponge-like biocomposite for repairing of rat calvarial critical-sized bone defect. J. Bioact. Compat. Pol. 26, 335–346. ( 10.1177/0883911511407402) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meng YH, Tang CY, Tsui CP. 2010. Fabrication and characterization of bioglass-modified HA-ZrO2 biocomposites. Compos. Interface 17, 551–558. ( 10.1163/092764410X513404) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ohtsuki C, Kamitakahara M, Miyazaki T. 2009. Bioactive ceramic-based materials with designed reactivity for bone tissue regeneration. J. R. Soc. Interface 6, 349–360. ( 10.1098/rsif.2008.0419.focus) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ji JJ, Dong XP, Ma XH, Tang SC, Wu ZY, Xia J, Wang QX, Wang YT, Wei J. 2014. Preparation and characterization of bioactive and degradable composites containing ordered mesoporous calcium-magnesium silicate and poly(l-lactide). Appl. Surf. Sci. 317, 1090–1099. ( 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.024) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jia JF, Zhou HJ, Wei J, Jiang X, Hua H, Chen FP, Wei SC, Shin JW, Liu CS. 2010. Development of magnesium calcium phosphate biocement for bone regeneration. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 1171–1180. ( 10.1098/rsif.2009.0559) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhu N, Cooper D, Chen XB, Niu HC. 2013. A study on the in vitro degradation of poly(l-lactide)/chitosan microspheres scaffolds. Front. Mater. Sci. 7, 76–82. ( 10.1007/s11706-013-0188-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cheung HY, Lau KT, Pow YF, Zhao YQ, Hui D. 2010. Biodegradation of a silkworm silk/PLA composite. Compos. B, Eng. 41, 223–228. ( 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.09.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lou T, Wang X, Song G, Gu Z, Yang Z. 2014. Fabrication of PLLA/β-TCP nanocomposite scaffolds with hierarchical porosity for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 69, 464–470. ( 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang X, Li Y, Wei J, De GK. 2002. Development of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(hexamethylene adipamide) composites. Biomaterials 23, 4787–4791. ( 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00229-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wei J, Heo SJ, Kim DH, Kim SE, Hyun YT, Shin JW. 2008. Comparison of physical, chemical and cellular responses to nano- and micro-sized calcium silicate/poly(epsilon-caprolactone) bioactive composites. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 617–630. ( 10.1098/rsif.2007.1267) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, Missirlis YF. 2001. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 22, 87–96. ( 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Foppiano S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Saiz E, Tomsia AP. 2004. The influence of novel bioactive glasses on in vitro osteoblast behavior. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 71, 242–249. ( 10.1002/jbm.a.30159) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yamaguchi T, Chattopadhyay N, Kifor O, Butters RR, Sugimoto T, Brown EM. 1998. Mouse osteoblastic cell line (MC3T3-E1) expresses extracellular calcium (Ca2+o)-sensing receptor and its agonists stimulate chemotaxis and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 13, 1530–1538. ( 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1530) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Serre CM, Papillard M, Chavassieux P, Voegel JC, Boivin G. 1998. Influence of magnesium substitution on a collagen-apatite biomaterial on the production of a calcifying matrix by human osteoblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 42, 626–633. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tousi NS, Velten MF, Bishop TJ, Leong KK, Barkhordar NS, Marshall GW, Loomer PM, Aswath PB, Varanasi VG. 2013. Combinatorial effect of Si4+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ released from bioactive glasses on osteoblast osteocalcin expression and biomineralization. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33, 2757–2765. ( 10.1016/j.msec.2013.02.044) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lu JX, et al. 2012. Preparation, bioactivity, degradability and primary cell responses to an ordered mesoporous magnesium-calcium silicate. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 163, 221–228. ( 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.06.037) [DOI] [Google Scholar]





