Abstract
Patient: Male, 11
Final Diagnosis: Chromobacterium violaceum infection
Symptoms: Abscess • fever • rash
Medication: —
Clinical Procedure: ECMO
Specialty: Critical Care Medicine
Objective:
Rare disease
Background:
Chromobacterium violaceum (C. violaceum) is a facultative anaerobic gram-negative bacterium found in soil and water, especially in tropical and subtropical areas. Although infection in humans is rare, it is associated with significant morbidity. The bacterium is known for its resistance to multiple antimicrobials, and the possibility of relapse and reinfection. Presence of bacteremia, disseminated infection, and ineffective antimicrobial agents are predictors of mortality.
Case Report:
We report the case of a previously healthy 11-year-old male with C. violaceum sepsis who was exposed to stagnant water. He presented with severe septic shock and developed multi-organ system failure. Initial presumptive diagnosis was staphylococcal infection secondary to presence of skin abscesses resulting in antibiotic coverage with vancomycin, clindamycin, nafcillin and ceftriaxone. He also had multiple lung and liver abscesses. Once C. violaceum was identified, he received meropenem and ciprofloxacin, and was later discharged on ertapenem and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) to complete a total of six months of antibiotics. He was diagnosed with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) and is currently on prophylactic TMP-SMX and itraconazole. He has not had any relapses since his initial presentation.
Conclusions:
This case highlights the importance of considering C. violaceum as a relevant human pathogen, and considering it early in temperate regions, particularly in cases of fulminant sepsis associated with multi-organ abscesses. Once C. violaceum is identified, appropriate antimicrobial therapy should be started promptly, and sufficient duration of treatment is necessary for successful therapy.
MeSH Keywords: Chromobacterium, Pediatrics, Sepsis, Drug Therapy
Background
Chromobacterium violaceum (C. violaceum) is a facultative anaerobic bacterium that is prevalent in temperate climates of the United States and worldwide in soil and stagnant water [1–3]. The first case of C. violaceum infection in humans was reported in 1927 [1]. Although human infections are still rare, recent interest in the medical virulence of C. violaceum has emerged secondary to the severe morbidity and mortality associated with infection [4]. Patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) are at increased risk for infection, because of their innate inability to perform oxygen metabolism [5]. Infection typically occurs during the summer months, and often results from an area of broken skin followed by hematogenous seeding [6–8].
Here, we discuss a case of C. violaceum sepsis associated with multiple organ abscesses in a child exposed to stagnant water. Despite rapidly progressive shock and development of multi-organ system failure, he survived his illness. He was successfully treated with use of appropriate antibiotics, and has not had relapse or any reinfection at the time of this case report. He was later diagnosed with CGD, and currently remains on prophylactic treatment.
Case Report
An 11-year-old male presented to a regional community hospital with gluteal abscesses. The only reported past medical history was a submental abscess at age two that was drained, and resolved without further treatment. Prior to this hospitalization, he had no other symptoms, including the absence of fever, rash, myalgia and lethargy. The parents reported that recently the patient had been in areas of stagnant water, during football practices. His lesions were initially small (Figure 1A), but progressed within two days to approximately two centimeters in diameter (Figure 1B) with deep induration of the gluteal tissue. He was placed on per oral (PO) clindamycin for outpatient treatment. However, within twenty-four hours, he developed a high fever and was admitted to the local community hospital for surgical drainage of presumed staphylococcal soft tissue infection, with clindamycin given intravenously (IV) and IV ceftriaxone added to his antibiotic regimen.
Figure 1.

(A) Small gluteal lesions 2 days after exposure to stagnant water. (B) On his initial presentation to the community hospital, the lesions were approximately 2 centimeters in diameter, with a larger surrounding area of erythema. (C) Lesions were deep and indurated upon his presentation to the PICU, and were approximately 24 hours post-drainage.
Within thirty-six hours of admission, he began having shortness of breath and hypoxia. At that time, he was transferred directly to our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for further care. On arrival to the PICU, he complained of significant dyspnea, with grunting and retractions noted on exam. The patient was urgently intubated for impending respiratory failure and progressive shock. Physical exam revealed two large, indurated abscesses on the buttocks as well as multiple small pustules on his chest, abdomen, and extremities concerning for staphylococcal infection or for ecthyma (Figure 1C). Initial laboratory examination revealed elevated lactate of 5.5 mg/dL and a white blood cell count of 2.12×103/μL. Within 12 hours, the lactate increased precipitously to 12.2 mg/dL and leukopenia progressed to 0.85×103/μL, with an absolute neutrophil count nadir of 100.
After intubation, the patient briefly stabilized, but quickly developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring oscillatory ventilation. By eighteen hours post-transfer, his oxygenation index was consistently greater than 50 despite maximal oscillatory support, and he remained hypotensive despite aggressive fluid resuscitation and infusions of dopamine, milrinone, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin. Due to the patient’s refractory ARDS and overwhelming septic shock, he was placed on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in an attempt to maximize cardiac output. The patient was also oliguric on arrival and quickly progressed to anuria, requiring continuous renal replacement therapy within twelve hours of arrival.
Given the patient’s presentation with gluteal abscesses, the initial antibiotics were based on a presumptive staphylococcal infection (vancomycin, clindamycin and nafcillin). A report of trace gram- negative rods in the wound gram stain also led to the continuation of ceftriaxone. However, because of his significant clinical decompensation, meropenem was added empirically in place of ceftriaxone within two hours of his admission to the PICU. With the identification of C. violaceum from the wound and blood cultures, IV TMP-SMX and ciprofloxacin were added to his antibiotic regimen given the known variable antimicrobial resistance characteristic of this pathogen. Susceptibilities from the outside hospital cultures later revealed a susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and TMP-SMX, with intermediate susceptibility to amikacin. Once the sensitivities were known, the antibiotics were paired down to meropenem and ciprofloxacin.
In total, he required fourteen days of ECMO support, and an additional five days of mechanical ventilation. He was ultimately in the PICU for a total of five weeks, and was discharged home on hospital day forty. During his hospitalization, imaging revealed multiple septic emboli and abscesses involving his lungs and liver. However, none were large enough to warrant surgical intervention. The patient was sent home on IV ertapenem (instead of meropenem due to ease of once daily dosing) and PO TMP-SMX to continue therapy for C. violaceum.
After approximately four months of therapy, a computed tomography was obtained which showed resolution of the lung abscesses, but the scan was notable for non-enhancing liver lesions consistent with residual scarring versus abscess. Because erythrocyte sedimentation rate was still mildly elevated at that time, antibiotic therapy was continued with PO ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX. After six months of therapy, all antibiotics were discontinued for his C. violaceum infection because of clinical return near baseline and normalized inflammatory markers. He ultimately developed auto-amputation of the distal end of his right thumb and several toes, and required skin grafting of the dorsum of his right foot but returned to school four months after initial illness and he has no other permanent sequelae of his life-threatening infection.
Since there is a reported increased susceptibility to C. violaceum-induced disease in patients with CGD [5,9,10], testing was performed, and our patient was found to have the c.75-76delGT mutation in a homozygous state, confirming the diagnosis of CGD. Additionally, on further review of his medical records, the abscess that was drained when he was two years old grew Nocardia, an organism found more commonly in patients with immune dysfunction. Currently, the patient is being maintained on prophylactic TMP-SMX and itraconazole, in addition to interferon-gamma therapy.
Discussion
This case report highlights the importance for C. violaceum infection to be considered in the patient with abscesses who presents with sepsis and multi-system organ failure, when receiving adequate gram-positive coverage for more common pathogenic sources or if cultures reveal the presence of gram-negative rods.
As an uncommon, but highly virulent pathogen, infection with C. violaceum is associated with very high morbidity and mortality [4]. A constellation of findings commonly attributed to C. violaceum infection includes fever, presences of abscesses and skin lesions. In fact, rapid progression of sepsis, and the presence of multi-organ abscesses is a notable feature of C. violaceum infection [4,11–12]. Predisposing risk factors for acquiring this infection includes wading in water, play or fall in muddy water, with the highest risk for mortality associated with young age, presence of abscesses, shorter duration of clinical course and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy [13]. Unfortunately, due to its uncommon occurrence, despite the high mortality, there are currently no controlled trials comparing appropriate antibiotic therapy for this infection.
Generally C. violaceum displays sensitivities similar to what was reported with our patient, with some variation in susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, penicillins and TMP-SMX [6,7,14,15]. Bosch et al. reported a septic patient who displayed sensitivities to cefepime, piper-acillin/tazobactam, and gentamicin similar to our patient, however, it was resistant to TMP-SMX; they successfully treated with amikacin and cefepime [16]. Conversely, Campbell et al. reported a four-year-old patient with bacteremia whose isolate had no documented resistance [2]. In our patient, due to reported variability in resistance patterns, once the organism was identified as C. violaceum, he was placed on ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX therapy. This was tailored to meropenem and ciprofloxacin once the susceptibility profiles for the organism were determined. Many reports have successfully used ciprofloxacin, either alone [15] or in combination with piperacillin [7] or TMP-SMX [17]. Ciprofloxacin has been stated to be the most effective antibiotic for C. violaceum [18], including a comparative study by Aldridge et al. that demonstrated the superiority of its in vitro activity against clinical strains of C. violaceum [19]. However, others have reported resistance to ciprofloxacin [15,20], with the mechanism of resistance thought to include efflux pumps and the presence of penicillin-binding proteins [20]. A review by Sirinavin et al., further suggests that effective antimicrobials for severe C. violaceum infection include ciprofloxacin, TMP-SMX, chloramphenicol and imipenem [4]. Together with these previously published studies, our case report would suggest treatment of invasive infection with ciprofloxacin in conjunction with a second antimicrobial agent due to the potential ciprofloxacin resistance.
Patients with CGD are particularly vulnerable to C. violaceum infection due to the fact that this is a catalase positive bacterium [5,9,10,21]. However, fulminant disease has been reported in non-CGD patients, and the most important predictors for mortality are presence of bacteremia, disseminated infection and use of ineffective antibiotics [4,11,13]. Nonetheless, as the literature demonstrates, in patients with C. violaceum infection, it is important to determine if the patient has an underlying immune disorder such as CGD or G6PD deficiency [22], as it necessitates maintenance antibiotic therapy. Workup for CGD should particularly be considered in patients who have a previous history of unusual infection of the skin or lymph node with other catalase positive organism such as staphylococcus aureus, Nocardia or Aspergillus. Seigel et al. reported a 14-year old teenager who developed necrotizing fasciitis secondary to C. violaceum, who was subsequently found to have CGD [23]. In many cases, as in our patient, C. violaceum can be the first infectious disease that leads to the diagnosis of CGD [23,24].
Relapse can occur with C. violaceum infection in humans, especially if the antibiotics were discontinued prematurely, or if the patients received inappropriate antibiotics for the initial infection, and in the presence of abscess, presumably because of viable organisms remaining in abscess cavities [13,25,26]. In a case report by Ponte el al., a nine-year old patient died from C. violaceum bacteremia that relapsed within 48 hours of completing a 21-day course of appropriate antibiotics [27]. Sirinavin et al. reported a case of a three-year old child who had multiple relapses despite completing a 21-day course of treatment [4)]. Current reports suggest treatment duration of up to three months [4,6,13]. In our patient’s case, imaging of the liver obtained at four months into therapy demonstrated liver lesions with persistently elevated inflammatory markers, thus in the face of these findings and his known immunodeficiency, treatment was continued. After six months of therapy, the patient’s inflammatory markers returned to normal, therefore antibiotic treatment was stopped and he was changed to prophylactic therapy for his CGD. The outcome of our patient, though significant for multiple auto-amputation of digits, is remarkable for no residual end-organ damage and, now, greater than one year later, the patient has essentially achieved full recovery.
Conclusions
This case highlights the need for consideration of C. violaceum infection in patients who develop refractory shock despite adequate antibiotic coverage for presumptive gram-positive sepsis secondary to abscesses, especially in those with a history of exposure to stagnant water. Secondary to variable resistance patterns of C. violaceum, it highlights the need to consider combination therapy of effective antimicrobial agents. A minimum duration of 3 months should be considered in those with invasive C. violaceum infection, with a longer duration of up to 6 months (as in our patient) that should be guided by the individual patient’s clinical course.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Dr. Kathy Monroe for her review of this manuscript.
Glossary
- C. violaceum
Chromobacterium violaceum;
- ECMO
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
- TMP-SMX
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole;
- CGD
chronic granulomatous disease;
- IV
intravenous (intravenously);
- PICU
pediatric intensive care unit;
- ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;
- PO
oral (per os)
Footnotes
Financial disclosure
No authors have financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Conflict of interest
The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References:
- 1.Sneath PH, Whelan JP, Bhagwan Singh R, Edwards D. Fatal infection by Chromobacterium violaceum. Lancet. 1953;265:276–77. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(53)91132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Campbell JI, Lan NP, Qui PT, et al. A successful antimicrobial regime for Chromobacterium violaceum induced bacteremia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaufman SC, Ceraso D, Schuquernsky A. First case report from Argentina of fatal septicemia caused by Chromobacterium violaceum. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:956–58. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.5.956-958.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sirinavin S, Techasaensiri C, Benjaponpitak S, et al. Invasive Chromobacterium violaceum infection in children: case report and review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24:559–61. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000164761.81491.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Macher AM, Casale TB, Fauci AS. Chronic granulomatous disease of childhood and Chromobacterium violaceum infections in the southeastern united states. Ann Inter Med. 1982;97:51–55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-1-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shao PL, Hsueh PR, Chang YC, et al. Chromobacterium violaceum infection in children: a case of fatal septicemia with nasopharyngeal abscess and literature review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:707–9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200207000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vijayan AP, Anand MR, Remesh P. Chromobacterium violaceum sepsis in an infant. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:721–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baker S, Campbel JI, Stabler R, et al. Fatal wound infection caused by Chromobacterium violaceum in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3853–55. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01068-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Macher AM, Casale TB, Gallin JI, et al. Chromobacterium violaceum infection and chronic granulomatous disease. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:259. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-2-259_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sorensen RU, Jacobs MR, Shurin SB. Chromobacterium violaceum adenitis acquired in the northern United States as a complication of chronic granulomatous disease. Pediatr Infect Dis, J. 1985;4:701–2. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198511000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Martinez P, Mattar S. Fatal septicemia caused by Chromobacterium violaceum in a child from Colombia. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2007;49:391–93. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652007000600011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moore CC, Lane JE, Stephes JL. Successful treatment of an infant with Chromobacterium violaceum sepsis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:E107–10. doi: 10.1086/319356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang CH, Li YH. Chromobacterium violaceum infection: a clinical review of an important but neglected infection. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011;74:435–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chang CY, Lee YT, Liu KS, et al. Chromobacterium violaceum infection in Taiwan: a case report and literature review. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007;40:272–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dutta S, Dutta SK. Multidrug resistant Chromobacterium violaceum: An unusual bacterium causing long standing wound abscess. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2003;21:217–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bosch FJ, Badenhorst L, LeRoux JA, Louw VJ. Successful treatment of Chromobacterium violaceum sepsis in South Africa. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:1293–95. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.2008/001883-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Midani S, Rathore M. Chromobacterium violaceum infection. South Med J. 1998;91:464–66. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199805000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Teoh AYB, Hui M, Ngo KY, et al. Fatal septicemia from Chromobacterium violaceum: case reports and review of the literature. Hong Kong Med J. 2006;12:228–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aldridge KE, Valaninis GT, Saners CV. Comparison of the in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin and 24 other antimicrobial agents against clinical strains of Chromobacterium violaceum. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;10:31–39. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90124-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fantinatti-Garboggini F, Almeida RD, Portillo VA, et al. Drug resistance in Chromobacterium violaceum. Genet Mol Res. 2004;3:134–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Winkelstein JA, Marino MC, Johnston RB, et al. Chronic granulomatous disease: report on a National Registry of 368 patients. Medicine. 2000;79:155–69. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200005000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mamlok RJ, Mamlok V, Mills GC, et al. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, neutrophil dysfunction and Chromobacterium violaceum sepsis. J. Pediat. 1987;111:852–54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80203-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Seigel JK, Stadler ME, Lombrano JL, et al. Chromobacterium violaceum necrotizing fasciitis: a case report and review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2012;91:479–83. doi: 10.1177/014556131209101108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brown KL, Stein A, Morrell DS. Ecthyma gangrenosum and septic shock syndrome secondary to Chromobacterium violaceum. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:S224–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tucker RE, Winter WG, Wilson HD. Osteomyelitis associated with Chromobacterium violaceum sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:949–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chattopadhyay A, Kumar V, Bhat N, Rao P. Chromobacterium violaceum infection: rare but frequently fatal disease. J Pedatr Surg. 2002;37:108–10. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.29439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ponte R, Jenkins SG. Fatal Chromobacterium violaceum infections associated with exposure to stagnant waters. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:583–86. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199207000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
