Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 22;5:15662. doi: 10.1038/srep15662

Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Interferon Signalling Molecules and IGFBP3 in Human Degenerative Annulus Fibrosus

Zepur Kazezian 1,6, Rahul Gawri 2,3, Lisbet Haglund 2, Jean Ouellet 2, Fackson Mwale 3, Finbarr Tarrant 4, Peadar O’Gaora 4, Abhay Pandit 1,6, Mauro Alini 5,6, Sibylle Grad 5,6,a
PMCID: PMC4614807  PMID: 26489762

Abstract

Low back pain is a major cause of disability especially for people between 20 and 50 years of age. As a costly healthcare problem, it imposes a serious socio-economic burden. Current surgical therapies fail to replace the normal disc in facilitating spinal movements and absorbing load. The focus of regenerative medicine is on identifying biomarkers and signalling pathways to improve our understanding about cascades of disc degeneration and allow for the design of specific therapies. We hypothesized that comparing microarray profiles from degenerative and non-degenerative discs will lead to the identification of dysregulated signalling and pathophysiological targets. Microarray data sets were generated from human annulus fibrosus cells and analysed using IPA ingenuity pathway analysis. Gene expression values were validated by qRT-PCR, and respective proteins were identified by immunohistochemistry. Microarray analysis revealed 238 differentially expressed genes in the degenerative annulus fibrosus. Seventeen of the dysregulated molecular markers showed log2-fold changes greater than ±1.5. Various dysregulated cellular functions, including cell proliferation and inflammatory response, were identified. The most significant canonical pathway induced in degenerative annulus fibrosus was found to be the interferon pathway. This study indicates interferon-alpha signalling pathway activation with IFIT3 and IGFBP3 up-regulation, which may affect cellular function in human degenerative disc.

Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability that has become a serious socio-economic burden1. Although LBP is common in people who are between 20 and 50 years old, the burden is more persistent in the older population2. According to the WHO, LBP is the most costly healthcare problem, and estimates suggest that the total costs exceed $100 billion per year in the United States alone3. LBP is commonly linked to the degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD)4,5. Discogenic low back pain is considered to originate from critical tears and fissures in the annulus fibrosus (AF) leading to nerve ingrowth and crucial weakness of the outer annulus that eventually results in a protrusion of nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue6. Annular defects may arise from trauma, aging or disc degeneration and may lead to extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation with concomitant loss of proteoglycan, tissue hydration and disc height. This weakens the AF such that it cannot withstand the hydrostatic pressures from the NP nor stabilise the functional spine unit7.

Current surgical therapy options include the removal of the degenerated or herniated tissue or even the partial or complete replacement of the disc with an artificial substitute8. However, these approaches have considerable drawbacks, such as the risk for adjacent disc degeneration and the failure of the artificial implants to accurately replace the normal disc in terms of movements and absorbing the load pressure9,10. Therapeutic intervention at an early stage of degeneration could avoid the need for such highly invasive procedures. Although substantial advancement has been achieved in identifying the multifactorial mechanisms that encompass the degenerative flow, knowledge about molecular pathways involved in its initiation and progression is still limited. Therefore, the current focus of regenerative medicine is on identifying biomarkers and signalling pathways that provide a better understanding of the cascades of disc degeneration.

The abnormal cell-mediated response, the changes that occur in the extracellular matrix composition11 and the diminished biomechanical characteristics12, which can be induced by non-physiological mechanical loading13, genetic predisposition and decreased cell activity14, lead to gradual structural failure of the IVD. This condition defines the degenerative disc disease (DDD) that goes along with nerve in-growth and low back pain15. Disc degeneration is also accompanied by inflammation, which is one of the major factors leading to phenotype changes and apoptosis. During disc degeneration, anabolic metabolism is decreased, whereas the catabolic molecular markers are increased16. Importantly, comparison between healthy and degenerated discs shows an imbalance of inflammatory cytokines that significantly increase during the degenerative process. Among the inflammatory cytokines discovered to date in disc degeneration and herniation in patients with severe LBP in comparison with healthy tissues, interleukin (IL)1-beta and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha are most prominent17. During the progression of the degenerative process, many other inflammatory cytokines and catabolic mediators such as prostaglandin E2, nitric oxide, IL6, IL8, matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin motif (ADAMTS)4 and ADAMTS5 enzymes and the death-inducing ligand Fas synchronize and consequently degrade the extracellular matrix18,19.

Recently, the focus has shifted towards identifying signalling pathways affecting the cellular and molecular functions and highlighting the underlying molecular markers for better understanding of the degenerative process in the disc. One of the most important pathways identified recently is the Wnt signalling that may mediate IVD degeneration by activation of MMPs and degradation of matrix molecules leading to NP cell senescence20. Moreover, caveolin-1, which regulates the Wnt signalling pathway, was reported to be up-regulated in the human degenerated IVD and was correlated with an increase in cell senescence markers21. On the other hand, Smolders et al. reported that in the dog NP, caveolin-1 and hence Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is crucial for the preservation of notochordal cells and hence for disc regeneration22. Furthermore, signalling pathways that regulate pro-inflammatory processes are activated during IVD degeneration and have been reported as potential therapeutic targets. Specifically, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways have been identified as key regulators of inflammation, matrix catabolism and pain23. Recent findings also indicate a role of Notch signalling in the progress of disc degeneration, as Notch receptors and target genes were up-regulated in disc cells following treatment with pro-inflammatory cytokines24.

Nevertheless, further investigation into dysregulated processes in degenerative human disc is essential to provide more prospects for therapeutic targets. Large-scale assessment of molecular profiles enables us to comprehensively search for molecular markers and pathways associated with impaired cell functions in the human disc degenerative process. A genome-wide analysis of human AF samples was undertaken by Gruber et al. and focussed on the expression of genes associated with pain, neurotrophin and nerve regulation25. Significant changes in numerous genes related to these ontologies were found in more degenerated compared to less degenerated discs. In a similar study, microarray analysis was used to identify the expression patterns of genes related to mitochondrial function in human AF specimens, whereby the expression changes indicated mitochondrial dysfunction in degenerative AF26. Furthermore, gene expression profiling was utilised to detect differences between notochordal and chondrocyte-like nucleus pulposus cells from non-chondrodystrophic and chondrodystrophic dogs22; interestingly, dysregulation of canonical Wnt signalling was associated with early disc degeneration in chondrodystrophic breeds. Recently, several differentially expressed long noncoding RNAs were identified by microarray analysis of degenerative versus non-degenerative human NP samples, expanding our understanding of aberrant gene regulation in DDD27.

In the present study, a new set of microarray data was generated and analysed from human non-degenerative and degenerative disc cells, with particular emphasis on the annulus fibrosus which is the principal source of discogenic symptoms. Following on from the single gene alterations, we focussed on perturbations in molecular and cellular functions and signalling pathways in the degenerative AF. As such the objectives of this study were (1) to highlight the most dysregulated molecular markers and cellular functions in the human degenerative annulus fibrosus and (2) to identify the activated catabolic pathway(s) through the involved dysregulated molecular markers. The outcomes of this study provide further insight into the cascade of events during disc degeneration in the AF. In particular, results indicate that the interferon-alpha (IFNA) signalling pathway may be involved in mediating degeneration in AF tissue. This pathway may therefore be targeted with a well-designed therapeutic agent at early stages of degeneration.

Results

Microarray comparison of degenerative versus non-degenerative human AF

Degeneration of the AF often leads to protrusion and disc herniation. The present work therefore specifically analysed the phenotype changes in degenerative AF cells. The goal is to elucidate AF degenerative pathways to ultimately develop regenerative strategies and improve AF repair. To compare the complete gene expression profiles between cells from degenerative and non-degenerative human AF, Affymetrix® whole genome gene chip microarrays were used. Analysis of the data obtained from the microarray profiling of 16 degenerative and 8 non-degenerative samples led to the identification of 238 significantly differentially expressed genes in the degenerative human annulus fibrosus (Supplementary Table 1). Seventeen of the dysregulated molecular markers showed log2-fold change values above the cut off of ±1.5. Out of these 17 molecular markers 10 were up-regulated, while 7 were down-regulated in AF cells of degenerative versus non-degenerative discs (Table 1). Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) was identified as the most strongly up-regulated gene in degenerative human AF, indicating a dysregulation of IGF function in degenerative IVD.

Table 1. Microarray gene expression comparison of human annulus fibrosus cells.

Symbol Description p-value Log2 fold
IGFBP3 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 0.003 2.85
GREM1 Gremlin 1 0.002 2.54
PMAIP1 Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1 0.010 2.49
GDF15 Growth differentiation factor 15 0.003 2.29
IFIT3 Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 0.004 2.03
MGST1 Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 0.001 2.02
TFPI Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 0.002 2.01
IFIT1 Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 0.013 1.96
IFIT2 Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 2 0.032 1.89
GBP1 Guanylate binding protein 1, interferon inducible 0.006 1.86
GPR64 G protein-coupled receptor 64 0.022 −1.59
SOD3 Superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular 0.002 −1.64
CHAD Chondroadherin 0.020 −1.80
LOXL4 Lysyl oxidase-like 4 0.032 −1.83
LYVE1 Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 0.011 −1.85
BANK1 B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1 0.006 −2.09
IBSP Integrin-binding sialoprotein 0.002 −3.46
Open in a new tab

Significantly differentially expressed genes with p < 0.05, log2 fold cut off ≥±1.5 (degenerative (n = 16) versus non-degenerative (n = 8)).

Dysregulated molecular and cellular functions in the degenerative human AF

Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software system (IPA®, QIAGEN Redwood City) was used to identify dysregulations of molecular and cellular functions in degenerative human AF. Analysis of the microarray data by IPA system showed several dysregulated cellular and molecular functions, such as impaired cellular movement, cellular growth and proliferation, inflammatory response, and other disrupted cellular functions (Fig. 1). Out of these main dysregulated cellular functions, the cellular growth and proliferation in correlation with the inflammatory response was analysed in more detail using IPA, as these functions are key determinants of human disc degeneration16. The analysis of the genes included in each function/bar graph with the IPA system, showed the interrelation of the inflammatory response via the cytokine interferon-alpha (IFNA) and its signalling pathway, which induces downstream genes such as interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 (IFIT3), with the cell growth and proliferation through IFIT328 and IGFBP3; both IFIT3 and IGFBP3 negatively regulate the cell cycle and influence the cell growth and proliferation29. This suggests that diminished cell proliferation in degenerative AF might be mediated by interferon induced proteins and loss of IGF function.

Figure 1. Molecular and cellular functions in the human degenerative versus non-degenerative annulus fibrosus.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The bar graph image obtained from IPA ingenuity pathway analysis system shows the 10 most dysregulated molecular and cellular functions identified from microarray data of human degenerative versus non-degenerative annulus fibrosus. N = 16 for degenerative; N = 8 for non-degenerative samples.

Significant molecules involved in the cell proliferation network of the degenerative human AF

Based on the finding of dysregulated cellular growth and proliferation, this function was assessed specifically using the IPA system to comprehensively elucidate proliferation related genes altered in degenerative human AF. Analysis of the microarray data by IPA system revealed 77 significantly differently expressed molecules involved in cellular proliferation (Fig. 2), out of which 8 were listed among the top dysregulated molecular markers (Table 1) and were illustrated in Fig. 3. These data corroborate the role of the differentially expressed molecules in the regulation of cellular growth and proliferation.

Figure 2. Cell proliferation network in the human degenerative versus non-degenerative annulus fibrosus.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The scheme is the result of microarray data analysis by the IPA ingenuity pathway analysis system showing 77 significantly dysregulated genes that are involved in the cellular growth and proliferation network. Red represents up-regulation of genes, while green represents down-regulation of genes. Light red or green represent slight up-regulation or down-regulation. Different shapes have different designations as indicated under http://ingenuity.force.com/ipa/articles/Feature_Description/Legend.

Figure 3. Most dysregulated genes involved in cell proliferation in the human degenerative annulus fibrosus.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The eight top dysregulated genes (p < 0.05, log2 fold ≥±1.5) were identified within the 77 significantly differently expressed genes (p < 0.05) involved in the cellular growth and proliferation. All the 6 genes up-regulated (red) and the 2 genes down-regulated (green) negatively affect cell proliferation.

Dysregulated canonical pathways in the degenerative human AF

To specifically investigate the signalling pathways that may lead to the up-regulation of IFIT genes (Table 1), the molecules involved in the canonical pathways were assessed by IPA. Analysis of the microarray data by IPA system showed several dysregulated canonical pathways (Fig. 4), including interferon (IFN) signalling (3/34), followed by UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine biosynthesis 1 (1/1), dermatan sulfate biosynthesis (3/43), Wnt/beta-catenin signalling (6/174), and xenobiotic metabolism signalling (8/294). Out of these impaired canonical pathways, the inflammatory cytokine interferon mediated signalling pathway was highlighted as the most dysregulated canonical pathway in the degenerated human AF. The results in Fig. 4 were generated by IPA based on the number of significantly differentially expressed genes in relation to the total number of genes included in each pathway. Although the ratio of the significantly dysregulated molecules over the total number of dysregulated molecules involved in the UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine biosynthesis 1 is higher (1/1), the genes involved in the IFN signalling pathway (3/34) are more significant (p = 7.07E-03) than UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine biosynthesis 1 (p = 1.16E-02), ranking the IFN signalling as the top dysregulated pathway. Activation of IFN signalling may therefore play a substantial role in the degenerative human AF.

Figure 4. Canonical pathways in the human degenerative annulus fibrosus.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The bar graphs in A (scaled according to the ratio) and B (scaled according to the –log (p-value), are representative of the results from IPA ingenuity pathway analysis of microarray data from human degenerative versus non degenerative annulus fibrosus, showing the 5 most dysregulated canonical pathways in the degenerative annulus fibrosus. The canonical pathways involve interferon signalling as the top disrupted canonical pathway, followed by UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine biosynthesis 1, dermatan sulfate biosynthesis, Wnt/beta-catenin signalling, and xenobiotic metabolism signalling. The bar graphs are generated according to the number of the significant genes participating in each pathway. The ratios (in yellow) in graph A represent the number of significantly expressed genes over the total number of genes involved in each canonical pathway.

RT-PCR analysis of genes dysregulated in degenerative human AF

Based on the above results and on our interest in the regulation of inflammatory interferon signalling, the difference in expression of selected genes was measured by qRT-PCR analysis. Expression differences were analysed from the most dysregulated genes involved in cellular growth and proliferation and the genes induced by the interferon signalling pathway. As shown in Fig. 5, significant up-regulation in degenerative AF was confirmed for expression levels of IGFBP3 (5.53 ± 1.29 fold), IFIT3 (2.29 ± 0.53 fold), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) (2.85 ± 0.88 fold), and IFIT2 (3.98 ± 1.05 fold). Furthermore, while mRNA up-regulation was also noted for growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1 (PMAIP1), microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 (MGST1) and IFIT1, the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 5); while no increases were found by qPCR for gremlin 1 (GREM1) and guanylate binding protein 1 (GBP1) gene expression levels. In addition, the mRNA expression of both integrin-binding sialoprotein (IBSP) (ratio degenerative vs. non-degenerative 0.062 ± 0.026; p < 0.01) and B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1 (BANK1) (0.370 ± 0.070; p < 0.05) were markedly decreased in degenerative AF. These results confirmed the substantial increases in gene expression levels of factors involved in cell proliferation and interferon signalling that were evident from microarray data analyses.

Figure 5. Expression of genes up-regulated in the human degenerative versus non-degenerative annulus fibrosus.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Real-time RT-PCR data confirm IGFBP3, IFIT3, TFPI and IFIT2 were significantly increased in degenerative annulus fibrosus cells, while PMAIP1, GDF15, MGST1 and IFIT1 were up-regulated with no statistical significance. The data represent fold changes ± standard error. For statistical analysis, a two-tailed t-test was carried out on log2 transformed relative expression data and multiple testing correction was performed according to the method of Benjamini and Hochberg, with 10% false discovery rate considered significant. N = 10 for degenerative samples; N = 8 for non-degenerative samples; *p < 0.05; #p < 0.1 degenerative versus non-degenerative.

Immunohistochemistry

Safranin-O/Fast Green staining was used to qualitatively assess the degeneration of the disc, particularly the annulus fibrosus matrix. In the non-degenerative discs of grade I, collagen fibers in the AF were intact and aligned in parallel, while fibers were disrupted with no clear arrangement in the degenerative discs. Representative sections from discs with reported immunostaining are shown in Fig. 6. IGFBP3 as the most dysregulated molecular marker and IFIT3 as the most dysregulated interferon-induced protein (Table 1) were selected for immunohistochemical detection and localisation of the proteins in human annulus fibrosus. A strong cytoplasmic immunostaining for IGFBP3 and IFIT3 was observed in severely degenerative areas of the human AF (Fig. 7a,d). In areas of only slight degenerative changes, cellular staining for IFIT3 was observed, though a considerable proportion of cells were negative for IFIT3. IGFBP3 immunolabelling was also detectable in cells of less degenerative AF regions, although the staining appeared weak. Furthermore, IGFBP3 positive cells were noted around the vessels occasionally seen in degenerative AF samples. In non-degenerative discs (Grade I), single cells that were positive for IGFBP3 were sporadically detected in the AF, although young AF tissue was mostly negative for IGFBP3 (Fig. 7c); IFIT3 positive cells were also observed in the AF of normal grade I discs (Fig. 7f), although immunostaining was weaker in non-degenerative compared to degenerative discs.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Safranin-O/Fast Green stained sections of annulus fibrosus tissue from a non-degenerative (a,c) and a degenerative (b,d) disc. Intact fibers with parallel arrangement are noted in the AF of a lumbar disc (degeneration Grade I) from a 13 year old male (c); while fibers are loose and arrangement is disrupted in the AF of a lumbar disc from a 47 year old female with disc degeneration Grade III (d). Scale bars: 500 μm (a,b); 100 μm (c,d).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Immunohistochemical analysis of IGFBP3 (a–c) and IFIT3 (d–f) in sections of human degenerative (a, b, d, e) and non-degenerative (c, f) annulus fibrosus. Intense immunolabelling for IGFBP3 (a) and IFIT3 (d) was observed in degenerated regions of the annulus fibrosus of a lumbar disc from a 47 year old female with disc degeneration Grade III. Negative control sections for IGFBP3 (b) and IFIT3 (e) did not show any staining. IGFBP3 positive cells were absent (c), while IFIT3 positive cells were observed in the inner annulus fibrosus of a normal disc (f) (degeneration Grade I) from a 13 year old male. Scale bar: 50 μm.

The interferon signalling pathway activated in the degenerative human AF

The findings throughout the analysis of the current microarray data with IPA ingenuity software were summarized in a common scheme. Combined data indicate that interferon-alpha (IFNA) signalling pathway is activated in the human degenerative annulus fibrosus via induction of 3 IFITs and other genes such as IGFBP3; a respective schematic was adapted from the pathway illustration generated by the IPA system (Fig. 8).

Figure 8. Interferon (IFN) signalling pathway in the human degenerative disc.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

The schematic generated is representative of the figure produced by IPA ingenuity pathway analysis system that shows the most dysregulated canonical pathway, the IFN signalling pathway, identified by microarray data of human degenerative versus non-degenerative annulus fibrosus. Several genes found dysregulated in degenerative annulus fibrosus are induced or up-regulated through IFNA signalling pathway, such as IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, as well as IGFBP3 and are indicated in pink.

Discussion

Disc degeneration is a chronic disease that involves different factors leading to the decrease in the number of disc cells and eventually to ECM degradation, neural invasion and low back pain15,30. To identify the molecular markers that are altered in the degenerative AF due to induced catabolic pathways during disc degeneration, microarray data sets from cells of non-degenerative and degenerative human AF tissues were investigated. To maximise the statistical power of our analysis, we chose to compare non-degenerated samples (grades I-II) to degenerated samples (grades III-V). Individual grade categories lacked sufficient sample numbers to detect significant differences in gene expression. Microarray comparison revealed seventeen molecular markers with log2-fold change ≥±1.5, while 238 genes were significantly up-regulated or down-regulated in the human degenerative AF. Moreover, analysis of the major dysregulated functions in the human degenerative AF revealed several dysregulated cellular and molecular mechanisms. Of those dysregulated functions, the cellular growth and proliferation in combination with the inflammatory response were analysed by biostatistical tools to determine the interrelation of these functions. Importantly, out of the main dysregulated molecules in the human AF that are involved in the cell proliferation network, both IGFBP3 and IFIT3 can adversely affect cellular growth and proliferation. Previous work has shown that IFIT3 and IGFBP3 were involved in the regulation of cellular growth and proliferation, exerting anti-proliferative effects on many cell types31,32,33.

In addition to the identification of the molecular markers and the cellular functions, the analysis by IPA system indicates that the IFN signalling pathway was activated, as IFN signalling was highlighted as the main dysregulated canonical pathway. Interferons are among the first cytokines discovered and have widely been investigated in research for interpretation of signalling pathways34. Originally, IFNs were identified by their antiviral activities; however, IFNs are nowadays better known for their distinct cellular functions including inhibition of proliferation and angiogenesis, induction of differentiation, and control of the immune system35. Because of IFNs’ anti-proliferative effect, they were introduced as a treatment for different medical conditions including viral, tumour, and neurological disorders36. The binding of type I IFNs to the IFNA receptors initiates a signalling cascade, which leads to the induction of more than 300 IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs)37. Although the presence of the inflammatory cytokine interferon-gamma (IFNG) has been described in herniated disc samples38, data about IFNA-related molecules in the context of IVD herniation or degeneration is scarce. According to the microarray data presented in the current study, several IFNA induced genes such as IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3 as well as IGFBP3 were up-regulated in the AF of the degenerative human discs. This might lead to AF cell growth arrest through the anti-proliferative IFIT3 and to apoptosis via the pro-apoptotic IGFBP3, which negatively regulate the cell cycle and induce apoptosis of the cells directly or indirectly39,40,41,42. IGFBP3 is an important regulator of IGF bioavailability that interferes with IGF function and has recently also been associated with the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis43. Besides, an IGFBP3 induced indirect effect is to sensitise the cells to cytokine mediated apoptosis signalling including TNFA and IFNG signalling29,33.

Although high significance was obtained by studying and comparing gene expression in degenerative versus non-degenerative human disc tissue, this study is beset with difficulties such as the inability to distinguish between diseased degenerative discs and normal aged discs, by the lack of identical grouping of the discs according to the age of the donors and the level of degeneration, and by the lack of absolute differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic degenerated discs. Moreover, although previous studies in rat, canine and human species did not reveal major differences in disc marker gene expression patterns between RNA extracted from isolated cells and RNA extracted directly from the tissues44,45,46,47, enzymatic cell isolation might have reduced or masked some degeneration related expression changes of certain genes.

In conclusion, this study indicates that among various degenerative processes in the disc, the IFN signalling pathway is a primarily dysregulated and significantly activated pathway in the degenerative human annulus fibrosus. Up-regulations of IFNA-induced IFITs as well as IGFBP3 are likely to negatively regulate the cell cycle, and hence decrease the disc cell number, eventually accelerating degeneration. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of IFNA signalling in disc degeneration through in vitro and ex vivo analysis of IFNA effects on disc cells and organ cultures and dissection of the signalling pathway by gene and protein expression analysis.

Methods

Collection and processing of human disc tissue samples

Intervertebral disc tissue was obtained by McGill Scoliosis and Spine Group from human lumbar discs through organ donation program of Transplant Quebec in accordance with the local and institutional ethical guidelines. The study was approved by McGill University Institutional Review Board (IRB# A04-M53-08B). Consent was obtained from family members of the donors. The disc tissue was harvested from spinal segments from levels T12-L1 to L4-L5; NP and AF regions were carefully dissected and separated. AF samples were collected from 6 male and 6 female donors, aged between 21 and 82 years (Table 2; samples ID 1–18) within a maximum of 12 hours after declaring brain death.

Table 2. Details of annulus fibrosus cell donors and corresponding RNA samples used for microarray profiling and qRT-PCR analysis (samples 1–27); details of whole disc donors and corresponding samples used for immunohistochemistry (samples 28–36).

Sample ID Donor ID Gender Age (y) DD Grade RNA_abs 260_280 RNA_abs 260_230 RIN QRT-PCR
1 1 M 73 III 2.12 1.99 7.8 x
2 1 M 73 IV 2.14 1.91 7.9 x
3 2 M 79 III 2.14 1.31 7.6 x
4 2 M 79 IV 2.14 1.68 7.8  
5 3 M 67 IV 2.17 1.85 8.0 x
6 3 M 67 V 2.19 2.04 7.9 x
7 4 F 76 IV 2.18 2.02 7.6 x
8 4 F 76 V 2.22 0.83 7.8  
9 5 F 81 III 2.15 1.87 8.4 x
10 5 F 81 IV 2.18 1.22 8.4 x
11 6 F 44 I 2.19 2.05 6.9 x
12 6 F 44 II 2.17 1.57 6.6 x
13 7 M 75 V 2.17 1.08 8.0 x
14 8 F 40 II 2.17 2.10 7.9 x
15 9 M 82 V 2.15 1.99 4.3 x
16 10 M 24 I 2.13 2.10 8.2  
17 11 F 23 I–II 2.14 2.73 8.5 x
18 12 F 21 I 2.12 0.84 8.5 x
19 13 F 61 III 2.16 2.05 9.2  
20 14 M 72 IV 2.14 2.12 8.7  
21 15 F 81 III 2.11 2.11 9.1  
22 16 M 25 I 2.11 2.08 8.1  
23 17 M 56 III 2.13 1.77 7.8  
24 18 M 32 I–II 2.14 2.05 8.5  
25 19 F 20 I 2.16 1.73 nd x
26 20 F 16 I 2.2 1.55 nd x
27 21 F 20 I 2.17 2.05 nd x
Level
28 22 M 25 II T12-L1      
29 23 F 47 III L2-L3      
30 24 F 42 II–III L4-L5      
31 25 F 10 I L4-L5      
32 26 F 34 II L5-S1      
33 27 M 13 I T11-T12      
34 27 M 13 I T12-L1      
35 27 M 13 I L4-L5      
36 28 F 47 III–IV T12-L1      
Open in a new tab

X-rays were taken from the harvested spines, and the degree of degeneration was evaluated macroscopically by dissecting the discs from the vertebral bodies and examining for features such as loss of regional demarcation and fissures according to the Thompson grading48. The grading was done by two independent observers; based on the grading, the discs from 5 donors were then assigned to the control/non-degenerative group having degeneration grades I–II, whereas the discs from 7 donors were assigned to the degenerative group, having grades III–V. A cell isolation step was included before RNA extraction in order to obtain RNA of sufficient quality and quantity suitable for microarray profiling. Cells were isolated from the tissue using sequential Pronase (Roche) and type II collagenase (Worthington Biochemical) digestion. Briefly, AF was minced, treated with 0.2% Pronase for 1 hour, and then with 0.04% collagenase for 6 hours. After enzymatic isolation, cell suspensions were filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer, washed twice with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), and lysed in Trizol Reagent® (Life Technologies). Total RNA was isolated using a chloroform extraction method followed by purification through the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega).

Microarray profiling and data analysis

Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific) and Bioanalyzer (Agilent) measurements were used to assess the quantity and quality of the RNA samples (Table 2). Samples were processed and profiled using the Human GeneChip U133 Plus 2.0 Affymetrix® arrays as described in previous work47. For statistical comparison of degenerative (grade III-V) versus non-degenerative (grade I-II) samples, data generated during an earlier study were included (Table 2; donor ID 13–18; samples ID 19-24)47, resulting in a total of 16 samples for the degenerative group and 8 samples for the non-degenerative control group. The statistical environment R (http://www.r-project.org) for Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org)49 and the MBNI probe set remappings50 were used for data analysis. Samples were background corrected, log2- transformed, and quantile-normalized using the gcrma51 and affy52 Bioconductor packages. To overcome the batch effect, a Bayesian adjustment of the expression matrix was carried out using the ComBat approach as implemented in the sva Bioconductor package for the R statistical environment. Prior to batch effect removal, the dataset was filtered to remove probe sets not expressed or expressed at very low levels in greater than 80% of samples. Expression differences between the groups were detected using the limma53 package with multiple testing correction performed according to the method of Benjamini and Hochberg54. Genes with adjusted p < 0.05 were considered significant. Gene array data were uploaded on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and are accessible under GSE70362.

Microarray data were further analysed through the use of QIAGEN’s Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software (IPA®, QIAGEN Redwood City, www.qiagen.com/ingenuity). The input data, composed of 238 significantly differently expressed genes with their log2 fold change and p-values (Supplementary Table 1), were uploaded into IPA system for the purpose of mapping the genes onto networks, functions and pathways. The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) is based on sample phenotype as well as on disease, cellular, molecular and sequence mechanisms. The analysis utilises specific tools to evaluate the data to produce networks and pathways based on molecular and cellular mechanisms after assigning certain cut offs for significance values.

Gene expression by qRT-PCR

Significantly dysregulated genes with at least ±1.5 log2 fold difference between non-degenerative and degenerative AF after microarray analysis were further quantified by real-time RT-PCR. mRNA samples from human AF cells of n = 8 non-degenerative and n = 10 degenerative discs (Table 2, column qRT-PCR) were used for complementary DNA synthesis and processed by TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems), using the following primer/probe systems: IGFBP3-Hs00365742_g1, GREM1-Hs01879841_s1, PMAIP1-Hs00560402_m1, GDF15-Hs00171132_m1, IFIT3-Hs01922752_s1, MGST1-Hs00220393_m1, TFPI-Hs00196731_m1, IFIT1-Hs01911452_s1, IFIT2-Hs01922738_s1, GBP1-Hs00977005_m1, IBSP-Hs00173720_m1, BANK1-Hs01009378_m1. PCR was performed using TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and standard thermal conditions (10 minutes at 95 °C for polymerase activation, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds and 60 °C for 60 seconds). Expression of target genes was normalized to the average of the 3 endogenous controls glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH-Hs99999905_m1), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1-Hs99999909_m1) and glucuronidase beta (GUSB-Hs99999908_m1). Gene expression was calculated according to the ∆Ct method55. For the statistical analysis, relative expression data were log2 transformed, and multiple testing correction was performed according to the method of Benjamini and Hochberg54.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Human intervertebral discs were collected and scored as outlined above (Table 2). Whole human discs were isolated as previously described56 retaining cartilaginous endplates. The discs were then fixed in 70% methanol for 5 days at 4 °C, sealed in dialysis bags (Spectr/Por 3, 3500 kDa molecular weight cut-off dialysis membrane) and decalcified with 12.5% neutral ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at 4 °C for 21 days with EDTA solution changed every third day. The decalcified discs were then dehydrated in an ascending ethanol gradient, and embedded in paraffin; sections of 6 μm were cut by microtome. Sections were deparaffinised and stained with 0.1% Safranin-O and 0.02% Fast Green to assess proteoglycan and collagen distribution.

For immunohistochemistry deparaffinised sections were first treated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating the sections (95 °C) in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 15 min. Then sections were blocked with 5% normal goat serum for 1 h and treated with anti-IGFBP3 antibody (Acris Antibodies, cat. nr. AP14347PU-N; 6.25 μg/mL) or anti-IFIT3 antibody (Aviva Systems, cat. nr. ARP46034_P050; 5 μg/mL) for 30 min at room temperature. Negative control sections were incubated with rabbit IgG isotype control (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Biotinylated secondary antibody (Vectastain ABC Elite, Vector Laboratories) was applied at 1:200 dilution, followed by ABC complex, and chromogen was developed using diaminobenzidine (ImmPACT DAB, Vector Laboratories). Counterstaining was carried out using Mayer’s haematoxylin.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kazezian, Z. et al. Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Interferon Signalling Molecules and IGFBP3 in Human Degenerative Annulus Fibrosus. Sci. Rep. 5, 15662; doi: 10.1038/srep15662 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep15662-s1.doc (294.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the AO Foundation Collaborative Research Program Annulus Fibrosus Repair. We thank William M. Gallagher, University of Dublin, for support with microarray profiling, Robert Peter for assistance in gene expression analysis, Nora Goudsouzian for preparation of histological samples, and Dirk Nehrbass and Christoph Sprecher for support with microscopy analysis.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Z.K. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript; R.G., L.H., J.O. and F.M. isolated specimens and performed experiments; F.T. and P.O. analysed the data and performed statistical analysis; A.P. and M.A. designed the study and supervised the work; S.G. performed experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Andersson G. B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354, 581–585, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassidy J. D., Cote P., Carroll L. J. & Kristman V. Incidence and course of low back pain episodes in the general population. Spine 30, 2817–2823 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Katz J. N. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 88 Suppl 2, 21–24, 10.2106/JBJS.E.01273 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yasuma T., Koh S., Okamura T. & Yamauchi Y. Histological changes in aging lumbar intervertebral discs. Their role in protrusions and prolapses. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 72, 220–229 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boos N. et al. Natural history of individuals with asymptomatic disc abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging: predictors of low back pain-related medical consultation and work incapacity. Spine 25, 1484–1492 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Melrose J. et al. Mechanical destabilization induced by controlled annular incision of the intervertebral disc dysregulates metalloproteinase expression and induces disc degeneration. Spine 37, 18–25, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cd8d5 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guterl C. C. et al. Challenges and strategies in the repair of ruptured annulus fibrosus. European cells & materials 25, 1–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibson J. N. & Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 32, 1735–1747, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180bc2431 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frei H., Oxland T. R., Rathonyi G. C. & Nolte L. P. The effect of nucleotomy on lumbar spine mechanics in compression and shear loading. Spine 26, 2080–2089 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eck J. C., Humphreys S. C. & Hodges S. D. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 28, 336–340 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyons G., Eisenstein S. M. & Sweet M. B. Biochemical changes in intervertebral disc degeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 673, 443–453 (1981). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guiot B. H. & Fessler R. G. Molecular biology of degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery 47, 1034–1040 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hutton W. C. et al. The effect of compressive force applied to the intervertebral disc in vivo. A study of proteoglycans and collagen. Spine 23, 2524–2537 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Natarajan R. N., Ke J. H. & Andersson G. B. A model to study the disc degeneration process. Spine 19, 259–265 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Adams M. A. & Roughley P. J. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 31, 2151–2161, 10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kepler C. K., Ponnappan R. K., Tannoury C. A., Risbud M. V. & Anderson D. G. The molecular basis of intervertebral disc degeneration. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 13, 318–330, 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.003 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Le Maitre C. L., Hoyland J. A. & Freemont A. J. Catabolic cytokine expression in degenerate and herniated human intervertebral discs: IL-1beta and TNFalpha expression profile. Arthritis research & therapy 9, R77, 10.1186/ar2275 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Burke J. G. et al. Intervertebral discs which cause low back pain secrete high levels of proinflammatory mediators. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84, 196–201 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Le Maitre C. L., Freemont A. J. & Hoyland J. A. The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis research & therapy 7, R732–745, 10.1186/ar1732 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hiyama A. et al. Enhancement of intervertebral disc cell senescence by WNT/beta-catenin signaling-induced matrix metalloproteinase expression. Arthritis and rheumatism 62, 3036–3047, 10.1002/art.27599 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heathfield S. K., Le Maitre C. L. & Hoyland J. A. Caveolin-1 expression and stress-induced premature senescence in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis research & therapy 10, R87, 10.1186/ar2468 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smolders L. A. et al. Gene expression profiling of early intervertebral disc degeneration reveals a down-regulation of canonical Wnt signaling and caveolin-1 expression: implications for development of regenerative strategies. Arthritis research & therapy 15, R23, 10.1186/ar4157 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wuertz K., Vo N., Kletsas D. & Boos N. Inflammatory and catabolic signalling in intervertebral discs: the roles of NF-kappaB and MAP kinases. European cells & materials 23, 103–119 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang H. et al. Inflammatory cytokines induce NOTCH signaling in nucleus pulposus cells: implications in intervertebral disc degeneration. The Journal of biological chemistry 288, 16761–16774, 10.1074/jbc.M112.446633 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gruber H. E., Hoelscher G. L., Ingram J. A. & Hanley E. N. Jr. Genome-wide analysis of pain-, nerve- and neurotrophin -related gene expression in the degenerating human annulus. Molecular pain 8, 63, 10.1186/1744-8069-8-63 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gruber H. E. et al. Mitochondrial gene expression in the human annulus: in vivo data from annulus cells and selectively harvested senescent annulus cells. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 11, 782–791, 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.06.012 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wan Z. Y. et al. Aberrantly expressed long noncoding RNAs in human intervertebral disc degeneration: a microarray related study. Arthritis research & therapy 16, 465, 10.1186/s13075-014-0465-5 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fensterl V. & Sen G. C. The ISG56/IFIT1 gene family. Journal of interferon & cytokine research: the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research 31, 71–78, 10.1089/jir.2010.0101 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Baxter R. C. Signalling pathways involved in antiproliferative effects of IGFBP-3: a review. Mol Pathol 54, 145–148 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ito K. & Creemers L. Mechanisms of intervertebral disk degeneration/injury and pain: a review. Global spine journal 3, 145–152, 10.1055/s-0033-1347300 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee H. Y. et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 inhibits the growth of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 62, 3530–3537 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spagnoli A. et al. Antiproliferative effects of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in mesenchymal chondrogenic cell line RCJ3.1C5.18. relationship to differentiation stage. J Biol Chem 276, 5533–5540, 10.1074/jbc.M005088200 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fang P., Hwa V., Little B. M. & Rosenfeld R. G. IGFBP-3 sensitizes prostate cancer cells to interferon-gamma-induced apoptosis. Growth Horm IGF Res 18, 38–46, 10.1016/j.ghir.2007.07.002 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sadler A. J. & Williams B. R. Interferon-inducible antiviral effectors. Nature reviews. Immunology 8, 559–568, 10.1038/nri2314 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Brierley M. M. & Fish E. N. Review: IFN-alpha/beta receptor interactions to biologic outcomes: understanding the circuitry. J Interferon Cytokine Res 22, 835–845, 10.1089/107999002760274845 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Parmar S. & Platanias L. C. Interferons: mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Curr Opin Oncol 15, 431–439 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Der S. D., Zhou A., Williams B. R. & Silverman R. H. Identification of genes differentially regulated by interferon alpha, beta, or gamma using oligonucleotide arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 15623–15628 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shamji M. F. et al. Proinflammatory cytokine expression profile in degenerated and herniated human intervertebral disc tissues. Arthritis and rheumatism 62, 1974–1982, 10.1002/art.27444 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Foser S., Redwanz I., Ebeling M., Heizmann C. W. & Certa U. Interferon-alpha and transforming growth factor-beta co-induce growth inhibition of human tumor cells. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 63, 2387–2396, 10.1007/s00018-006-6256-7 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kiepe D. et al. Differential effects of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins-1, -2, -3, and -6 on cultured growth plate chondrocytes. Kidney international 62, 1591–1600, 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00603.x (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Del Monte P. et al. Effects of alpha-interferon on insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-II and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 secretion by a human lung cancer cell line in vitro. Journal of endocrinological investigation 28, 432–439 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xiao S. et al. RIG-G as a key mediator of the antiproliferative activity of interferon-related pathways through enhancing p21 and p27 proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 16448–16453, 10.1073/pnas.0607830103 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Evans D. S. et al. Genome-wide association and functional studies identify a role for IGFBP3 in hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205020 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee C. R. et al. A phenotypic comparison of intervertebral disc and articular cartilage cells in the rat. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 16, 2174–2185, 10.1007/s00586-007-0475-y (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sakai D., Nakai T., Mochida J., Alini M. & Grad S. Differential phenotype of intervertebral disc cells: microarray and immunohistochemical analysis of canine nucleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus. Spine 34, 1448–1456, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a55705 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rutges J. et al. Variations in gene and protein expression in human nucleus pulposus in comparison with annulus fibrosus and cartilage cells: potential associations with aging and degeneration. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 18, 416–423, 10.1016/j.joca.2009.09.009 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Power K. A. et al. Identification of cell surface-specific markers to target human nucleus pulposus cells: expression of carbonic anhydrase XII varies with age and degeneration. Arthritis and rheumatism 63, 3876–3886, 10.1002/art.30607 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson J. P. et al. Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15, 411–415 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gentleman R. C. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome biology 5, R80, 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Dai M. et al. Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data. Nucleic acids research 33, e175, 10.1093/nar/gni179 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu Z., Irizarry R. A., Gentleman R., Martinez-Murillo F., Spencer F. A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays. J Amer Stat Assoc 99, 909–917, 10.1198/016214504000000683 (2004). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Irizarry R. A. et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249–264, 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Smyth G. K. in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor (ed Gentleman R., Dudoit S., Irizarry R., Huber W. ) 397–420 (Springer, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  54. Benjamini Y. H. Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57, 289–300 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  55. Livak K. J. & Schmittgen T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402–408, 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gawri R. et al. Development of an organ culture system for long-term survival of the intact human intervertebral disc. Spine 36, 1835–1842, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f81314 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep15662-s1.doc (294.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES