Abstract
The mitotic spindle apparatus is composed of microtubule (MT) networks attached to kinetochores organized from 2 centrosomes (a.k.a. spindle poles). In addition to this central spindle apparatus, astral MTs assemble at the mitotic spindle pole and attach to the cell cortex to ensure appropriate spindle orientation. We propose that cell cycle-related kinase, Nek7, and its novel interacting protein RGS2, are involved in mitosis regulation and spindle formation. We found that RGS2 localizes to the mitotic spindle in a Nek7-dependent manner, and along with Nek7 contributes to spindle morphology and mitotic spindle pole integrity. RGS2-depletion leads to a mitotic-delay and severe defects in the chromosomes alignment and congression. Importantly, RGS2 or Nek7 depletion or even overexpression of wild-type or kinase-dead Nek7, reduced γ-tubulin from the mitotic spindle poles. In addition to causing a mitotic delay, RGS2 depletion induced mitotic spindle misorientation coinciding with astral MT-reduction. We propose that these phenotypes directly contribute to a failure in mitotic spindle alignment to the substratum. In conclusion, we suggest a molecular mechanism whereupon Nek7 and RGS2 may act cooperatively to ensure proper mitotic spindle organization.
Keywords: cell division, mitotic spindle, mitotic spindle orientation, Nek7, RGS2
Abbreviations
- CREST
calcium-responsive transactivator
- EB1
end-binding protein 1
- GAP
GTPase-activating protein
- MT
microtubule
- Nek
NIMA-related kinase
- PCM
centrosomal pericentriolar material
- PD
pull-down
- PPI
protein-protein interaction
- RGS
regulators of G protein signaling
- WB
Western blotting
- shRNA
short-interfering RNA
Introduction
The central mitotic spindle is composed of MT networks that connect kinetochores to the mitotic spindle poles.1,2,3,4 In addition to the central spindle, astral MTs connect to spindle MTs via the spindle pole5 generating forces to segregate chromosomes to mother and daughter cells. These events contribute to accurate assembly, positioning, and orientation of the mitotic spindle.6,7,8 Failure of these processes can lead to cell death or chromosome instability, aneuploidy, and diseases, including cancer.9,10
Human serine/threonine-protein kinase, Nek7, is a member of NIMA-related kinase (Nek) family11,12,13,14 required for proper spindle formation and mitotic progression.15,16,17,18 Nek7 kinase activity reaches its maximum during mitosis19,20 where it localizes to the centrosome to ensure appropriate mitotic progression.15,16,17 In this regard, Nek7 loss reduces centrosomal localized pericentriolar material (PCM; e.g., pericentrin and γ-tubulin) during G2/M phase, arrests the cells in metaphase and subsequently causes apoptosis.21,16,17,12,22 Additional studies have suggested Nek7′s involvement in cytokinesis.18,23 Taken together, these studies indicate Nek7 as a regulator of cell cycle progression. However, the identification and characterization of bona fide downstream Nek7 substrates that participate in cell division remain unclear.
We have previously shown that the regulator of G-protein signaling, RGS2, interacts with Nek7 in yeast 2 hybrid screens and localizes with Nek7 at the central spindle and spindle poles.24 This has led to the hypothesis that RGS2, like Nek7, might be required for spindle organization and function.
Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are canonically known to reform the inactive heterotrimeric (αβγ) G protein at the plasma membrane, in part, by acting as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for several classes of G protein α subunits.25,26 RGS2, one of the first mammalian RGS proteins identified,27 is a negative regulator of Gα i and q.28 Although several works have identified specific classes of G protein α subunits and their regulators as critical components in asymmetric cell division,29,30 to date, no cell division function for RGS2 has been described.
In this study, we addressed the hitherto unknown characterization of RGS2 in regulating mitosis and mitotic spindle organization. The interaction and phosphorylation, the RGS2 spindle localization Nek7-dependent, as well as the similarities of mitotic phenotypes induced by Nek7 and RGS2, support the interpretation that RGS2 may act cooperatively with Nek7 to regulate the proper organization and function of the mitotic spindle.
Results
Nek7 binds to and phosphorylates RGS2
We have previously described the identification of canonical negative regulator of heterotrimeric G protein signaling, RGS2, as a Nek7 interactor through yeast 2-hybrid.24 To validate RGS2 as a Nek7 binding partner, we immobilized purified 6xHis-Nek7FL on Ni-NTA agarose beads and incubated the beads with HEK293T extract. In the pull-down we identified endogenous RGS2 (Fig. 1A) suggesting that the 2 proteins are present in the same complex. Furthermore, to confirm whether RGS2 could also behave as a Nek7 substrate, 6xHis-Nek7FL was incubated with [γ-32P]ATP in the presence or absence of purified RGS2-GST, NEK9-GST (a known Nek7 substrate24), or GST-control. The 6xHis-Nek7FL was able to phosphorylate recombinant RGS2 and NEK9, but not GST-control (Fig. 1B), demonstrating that RGS2 was an in vitro Nek7 substrate. The band observed below the predicted recombinant 52 kDa RGS2 appears to be a degradation product (Fig. 1B).
The RGS2 localization to the mitotic spindle is Nek7-dependent
To explore the functional involvement between Nek7 and RGS2, we investigated their in vivo cellular localization. We verified that endogenous RGS2 localized at the centrosome and to a subset of microtubules emanating from centrosome in a manner identical to α-tubulin during prometaphase (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, RGS2 localized at the spindle and to astral MTs during metaphase (Fig. 2A). Importantly, Nek7 localized along with RGS2 at the mitotic spindle and poles during prometaphase (Fig. 2B).These results raised the possibility that Nek7 and RGS2 might co-function in mitosis.
In order to further address this, we examined if Nek7 depletion affects RGS2 localization during mitosis (Fig. 2C). RGS2 localization to mitotic spindle and poles was severely reduced in Nek7-depleted cells (Fig. 2D), indicating that a precise level of Nek7 is critical to ensure proper recruitment of RGS2 to the mitotic spindle and poles. These findings are consistent with RGS2 being a novel Nek7 interactor and substrate and suggest that both work in concert to regulate mitotic progression. This is reinforced by the Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) profile, visualized by a crosstalk network of Nek7 and RGS2 (Fig. S1 and Table S1).
RGS2 is involved in mitotic progression
Next, we examined the role of Nek7- (Fig. 2C) and RGS2-depletion (Fig. 3A) on mitotic progression. We noticed that both Nek7 (data not shown) and RGS2-depleted cells caused a similar increase in the mitotic index (5–6%) compared to control (2–3%) (Fig. 3B).
To determine at what point a mitotic delay occurred with either Nek7- or RGS2-depletion, live-cell imaging was performed. Compared to control, both Nek7- and RGS2-depleted cells had a significant increase in time spent between nuclear envelope breakdown to anaphase onset (∼2-fold, Fig. 3C). Together, these findings indicate an involvement of Nek7 along with RGS2 in mitotic progression.
RGS2 depletion disrupts chromosomes segregation and mitotic spindle architecture
The mitotic delay following RGS2 depletion suggested a role for RGS2 in spindle formation. Based on this, we examined whether RGS2-depleted cells could appropriately align and assemble the MT-based mitotic spindle. Indeed, we found that RGS2-depleted metaphase cells exhibited misaligned kinetochores (CREST, Fig. 4A-a′). RGS2-depleted metaphase cells displayed DNA roughly aligned around a thicker metaphase plate (Fig. 4B), indicating defective congression of chromosomes to the metaphase plate. These misaligned chromosomes found in RGS2-depleted cells contained an elevated amount of Aurora B at their kinetochores (∼3-fold- compared to control, Fig. 4A-a′), a hallmark of inappropriate kinetochore-MT attachment.31,32
One possibility for inadequate MT-kinetochore attachment is from a poorly functioning mitotic spindle and pole.33 Strikingly, with RGS2 depletion, we found that MTs were poorly focused at mitotic spindle and poles during metaphase (EB1, Fig. 4B and Aurora A, Fig. 4C-c′, respectively) and in some cases it resulted in a kinked spindle (Fig. 4B). Moreover, Aurora A is poorly concentrated at the mitotic spindle pole, which is required for bipolar spindle assembly (Fig. 4C-c′ and for a review see refs. 34).
Since RGS2-depleted cells had unfocused MTs and chromosome misalignment, a problem with kinetochore fiber formation was suggested. Spindle MTs acetylation is closely correlated with kinetochore fiber MT stability.35 Therefore, we examined acetylated MTs in RGS2-depleted metaphase cells. Acetylated-α-tubulin was severely reduced in RGS2-depleted cells compared to control (Fig. 4D).
Nek7 and RGS2 are important for integrity of spindle poles
Due to RGS2 spindle pole localization (Figs. 2A and B) and its depletion leading to unfocused MTs in metaphase cells (Figs. 4B and C), we examined whether MT-nucleation factors (e.g., pericentrin and γ-tubulin)36,37,38 were recruited properly in RGS2-depleted cells.
Control metaphase cells have a robust focusing of γ-tubulin at the mitotic spindle pole with few dispersed γ-tubulin puncta (Fig. 5A). However, RGS2-depleted cells had a significant decrease in γ-tubulin at the mitotic spindle pole, with an increase in visible punctate staining throughout the cell (Fig. 5A). Consistent with previous reported effects of Nek7,17,22 γ-tubulin was reduced in cells overexpressing FLAG-Nek7FL or dominant negative FLAG-Nek7KD (Fig. 5B, columns 2 and 3), concomitantly, there was a decrease in γ-tubulin at the mitotic spindle pole of Nek7 or RGS2-depleted cells (Fig. 5B, column 4). In addition to γ-tubulin, pericentrin fragmentation could also be observed in RGS2-depleted cells (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, we noted that the localization of p150Glued, a subunit of dynein/dynactin complex, that mediates MTs capture events at the cortex,39 is dispersed at the spindle poles of RGS2-depleted cells (Fig. 5D). These results show that RGS2 contributes to mitotic spindle pole assembly and further corroborate the importance of Nek7 activity in the spindle pole functions.
RGS2 depletion affects spindle orientation
The mitotic delay and loss of spindle organization following RGS2-disruption indicated that RGS2 may have additional mitotic functions. Previous studies have argued that misorientation of the division plane causes a delay in flattening of the daughter cell farthest away from the substrate.40,33 Closer inspection of our live-cell imaging experiments revealed that RGS2-depleted cells had a misorientation of their cell division axis (Fig. 6A and Movie S3) whereas control cells usually divide parallel to the substratum (Fig. 6A and Movie S4). Consistent with this, the spindle angle relative to the cell-substrate adhesion plane in ∼35% of RGS2-depleted cells was >20°, where most control spindles divided parallel to the substratum (90% < 20°, Figs. 6B-C). These results demonstrate that RGS2 is required for proper spindle orientation.
Since spindle positioning and orientation are controlled by pulling forces exerted on the plus-end of astral MTs interacting to cell cortex factors,41 the precise distribution of astral and plus-end MTs to the cell cortex of control and RGS2-depleted cells were assessed. Interestingly, a severe loss of astral MTs was observed in RGS2-depleted cells by examining both α-tubulin and the plus-end binding protein EB1 (Fig. 6D), whereas control cells presented astral MTs that extend out to the cell cortex (Fig. 6D), suggesting that cortical interactions of MT astral were significantly impaired after RGS2 depletion.
Discussion
In this study we presented first evidence for RGS2 function in mitotic progression, spindle organization, and thus orientation. We propose that RGS2 has a role in mitosis is through its upstream kinase, has a Nek7.
Several findings in our study support this notion. First, we showed that Nek7 interacts with RGS224 and directly phosphorylates it in vitro. Second, Nek7 regulates the RGS2 mitotic spindle localization. Third, both Nek7 and RGS2 depletion led to a higher mitotic index accompanied by mitotic delay (Figs. 3A and 3B; for Nek7 see refs.16,18), with cells harboring chromosome alignment and kinetochore–microtubule attachment defects (Figs. 4A and 4B; for Nek7 see ref.23), disturbance in MT dynamics (Fig. 4D; for Nek7 see ref.42), as well as spindle centrosome nucleation failure (Fig. 5; for Nek7 see ref.17). In addition, we showed that expressing the phosphorylation mutant Nek7KD caused disrupted recruitment of γ-tubulin into the mitotic centrosome, corroborating previous data that Nek7 function loss affects spindle pole functions.17,22
We provide evidences that failure in chromosome alignment in RGS2-depleted cells could be the consequence of defective kinetochore-microtubule attachment, since we found kinetochores containing Aurora B, the key player in correction of kinetochore-microtubule attachment defects.43 In this respect, disturbance of MT dynamics, as shown by spindle-MTs acetylation disruption, would create inappropriate MT-kinetochore attachments. Thus, the absence of RGS2 affects the control of chromosomes alignment and MT dynamics that results in a failure to pull the sister chromatids apart. According, it has previously been shown that RGS2 interacts directly with α-tubulin via a short polypeptide within its amino-terminus (amino acids 41–60) and contributes to the neuronal cell differentiation via regulation of microtubule dynamics.44
Finally, the most prominent phenotype of silencing RGS2 expression was the induction of misoriented cell division. In this regard, we showed that the effects of RGS2 depletion on the spindle orientation are likely through the disruption of astral MTs, a prerequisite for orientation of the spindle.41 These findings appeared particularly notable because emerging evidences suggest a critical role of G α proteins in the control of asymmetric cell division via a regulatory role in the positioning of the mitotic spindle.45,46 In this scenario, RGS2 may accelerate the conversion of Gαi-GTP to Gαi-GDP, which can reassociate with Gαγβ to reform the heterotrimer, that in turn, recruits important components as NuMA/LGN to provide the anchor sites for dynein at the cortex from where it is thought to generate pulling forces on the mitotic spindle.7
Correct alignment of the mitotic spindle during cell division is crucial to maintain tissue organization, by ensuring an accurate distribution of genetic material and a normal division plane.10 It has been documented that mutations in multiple members of Neks, including Nek1 and Nek8, are associated to the formation of cystic kidneys47,48 and tumors.49 According to this, our findings suggest Nek7 and RGS2 as excellent candidates for contributing to tissue development. In addition, the cancer phenotypes induced by Nek7, including chromosomes missegregation and disruption of MT dynamics, make it an attractive target candidate for screening of new anti-cancer drugs, as previous show for other related targets.50,51
Although the finer mechanistic details of the regulatory link between Nek7 and RGS2 in spindle function remain to be deciphered, we propose that RGS2 may cooperate with Nek7 to regulate mitotic spindle organization (Fig. 7). Mutagenesis and mass spectrometry experiments should dissect the interaction and phosphorylation sites of RGS2 and Nek7 and determine whether Nek7 directly regulates RGS2 to control spindle assembly.
Materials and Methods
Plasmid constructions and proteins
The versions of Nek7 designed FL (full-length; amino acids 1–302) and KD (kinase dead; the Nek7 kinase activity was abolished by substituting the invariable catalytical lysine residues 63 and 64 by alanine - K63A/K64A) were cloned in-frame with the FLAG tag in a pCDNAFLAG vector (FLAG-Nek7FL and FLAG-Nek7KD constructs, respectively). Proteins 6xHis-Nek7FL, GST-RGS2, GST-NEK9(764–976) and GST were obtained according to de Souza et al.24
In Silico analysis
The retrieved DNA sequences from yeast 2-hybrid were processed, annotated and integrated in interaction networks using the Integrated Interactome System (IIS) platform, created by National Laboratory of Biosciences, Brazil.52 The biological processes and cellular components were attributed from the Gene Ontology (GO; http://www.geneontology.org/) database. The interaction network was visualized using Cytoscape 2.8.3 software.53
Affinity pull-down (PD) analysis
Candidate Nek7-interactor RGS2 was previously obtained from yeast 2-hybrid screens conducted as described elsewhere in de Souza et al., 2014.24 To validate RGS2 as Nek7 interacting proteins we performed pull-down assays. For this purpose, the baits 6xHis-Nek7FLor 6xHis-RARA were expressed and purified from Escherichia coli BL21 according to previously described by de Souza et al.24 6xHis-RARA was used as a control since RARA (Retinoic acid receptor α) is not described to interact with Nek7. Recombinant proteins were bound to Ni-NTA agarose resin at 4°C for 45 min. The resins were then washed 3 times for 5 min with wash buffer (50 mMTris-HCl pH 8.0, 1% NP40 and protease inhibitor cocktail) and incubated at 4°C overnight with HEK293T cellular lysates produced by homogenization in lysis buffer (50 mMTris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mMNaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitor cocktail). The pulled-down samples were washed 3 times in wash buffer and bound proteins were loaded on SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting (WB).
In vitro protein phosphorylation
To test the ability of Nek7 to phosphorylate RGS2 in vitro, GST-RGS2 as potential substrate, GST-NEK9(764–976) as a positive control and GST as a negative control (GST-control)(de Souza et al., 2014),24 were incubated with or without 6xHis-Nek7FL, plus 100 μM ATP and 185 kBq [γ-32P]ATP (222 TBq/mmol; NEN) at 25°C during 1 h. The reaction was stopped by addition of electrophoresis buffer and 10 μL of each reaction was resolved by SDS-PAGE.32P incorporation was detected by autoradiography.
Cell Culture, plasmid transfection and viral transduction
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gemini) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. We used mainly HeLa cells, which have been widely used to investigate various aspects of cell division, including spindle orientation.54,46,40
Cells were plated on glass coverslips in 6-well or 12-well dishes following incubation at 37ºC for 24 hours.
Plasmid constructs FLAG-Nek7FL, FLAG-Nek7KD or pCDNAFLAG vector as a control (FLAG-control) were transfected into HeLa cells using X-treme GENE DNA transfection reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer′s instructions.
Viral transduction was performed using lentiviral system carrying short-interfering RNAs (shRNAs) designed to target human Nek7 (Nek7 shRNA; 5′-CTTTAGTTGGTACGCCTTATT-3′), RGS2 (RGS2 shRNA; 5′-ACCCGTTTGAGCTACTTCTTA-3) or GFP (control shRNA; 5′-GGCAAGCUGACCCUGAAGUUC-3) purchased from The RNAi Consortium (TRC) (UMASSmed core, Worcester, USA). The shRNA targeting GFP was used as a control (shRNA control). The lentiviral particles were delivered to HeLa cells according to manufacturers′ instructions and stable HeLa cell lines were generated by selection with puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 3.5 μg/ml. The depletion or overexpression efficacy of Nek7 and RGS2 was assessed by immunoblotting.
Antibodies
The primary antibodies used for immunofluorescence were: rabbit anti-RGS2 (abcam - ab36561, 1:200 dilution), goat anti-γ- tubulin (Santa Cruz - sc-7396, 1:200 dilution), human anti-CREST (Antibodies Inc. - 15–234, 1:200 dilution), mouse anti-aurora A (abcam - ab13824, 1:1000 dilution), rabbit anti-aurora B (abcam - ab2254, 1:1000 dilution), rabbit anti-EB1 (Sigma-Aldrich - E3406, 1:1000 dilution), rabbit anti-pericentrin (Stephen Doxsey Lab, 1:1000 dilution), mouse anti-pericentrin (Abcam -ab28144, 1:1000 dilution), mouse anti-α-tubulin FITC conjugate (abcam - ab64503, 1:300 dilution), mouse anti-acetylated α- tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich -Aldrich - T6793, 1:1000 dilution), mouse p150glued (BD Transduction - P50520–050, 1:200 dilution), rabbit anti-PLK1 (Cell signaling Technology - 4513P, 1:100 dilution). The mouse anti-His5 (QIAGEN - 34660, 1:1000 dilution), mouse anti-GST (made in house), mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich - F1804, 1:1000 dilution), anti-Retinoic Acid Receptor α antibody (abcam - ab28767, 1:1000) antibodies were used for WB. Secondary antibodies for immunofluorescence staining for were obtained from the following sources: donkey anti-mouse AlexaFluor-488, donkey anti-goat AlexaFluor-488, donkey anti-rabbit AlexaFluor-488, chicken anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor-488, chicken anti-mouse Alexa Fluor-488, donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor-546, donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor-546, donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor-549, donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor-549, donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor-549, donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor-649, donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor-649, donkey anti-human AlexaFluor-649 (all from Invitrogen); horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse (Calbiochem) and HRP-linked antigoat or anti-rabbit secondary (Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies were used for WB purposes.
Immunofluorescence, microscopy and imaging software
Cells cultured on Cell Carrier plate (Perkin Elmer) were fixed and permeabilized with 3.7% formaldehyde solution (Sigma-Aldrich,F1635) containing 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS 1X supplemented with 50 mM EGTA and 30 μg/mL taxol. Cells cultured on microscope coverslips (25 mm diameter) were washed with PBS (Sigma-Aldrich) and then fixed with methanol for 20 min. The fixation reagent was gently replaced by 1x PBS and the cells were then permeabilized and blocked for 30 min in blocking buffer containing 2% bovine serum albumin, 2% calf serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) into PBS. The cells were incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer. Cover slips or 384 Cell Carrier plate were gently washed with 1x PBS and incubated with respective secondary antibodies. DAPI was used to counterstain the nucleus. The cells from 384 Cell Carrier plate were observed by fluorescence microscopy using Operetta High Content Imaging System (PerkinElmer) and the images edited using Volocity Demo 6.1.1 software.
From the coverslips of HeLa, a series of Z stack images of mitotic cells were captured from 0.2 μm thick sections using a Perkin Elmer Ultraview spinning disk confocal microscope: Zeiss Axiovert 200, 100x Plan-APOCROMAT NA1.4 Oil, DIC lens and Hamamatsu ORCA-ER camera. The entire fixed cell volume was imaged and displayed as maximum projections using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices) or processed for 3-D rendering using Imaris (Bitplane). Fluorescence range intensity was adjusted identically for each series of panels. Intensity profiles, linescan histograms and fluorescence intensity quantification were obtained from sum projections of Z stacks. Concentric circles pixels in diameter generated by MetaMorph were used to measure the fluorescence intensity of spindle poles (inner area) and local background (calculated as the difference between the outer and inner area).40 MetaMorph software was used to visualize spindle orientation and to measure distances required to calculate spindle angle. Spindle angle measurements were performed from the linear (x–y plane) and vertical (z-axis) distance between spindle poles as previously described.40Graphs were created and analysis of statistical significance was performed by the Student t-test using GraphPad Prism software. Bars represent SE, P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Time Iapse image
Stable HeLa cell line was cultured in a chamber apparatus or glass-bottom 6-well tissue culture plates (MatTek) in complete medium with CO2 exchange (0.5 Ls/ min) at 37°C. Cells were imaged every 10 min for 16 h using a 40× phase contrast lens. Images were captured on a Cool Snap HQ CCD camera (Roper Scientific) and concatenated using Metamorph software.
Supplementary Material
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sambra Redick and John Schiel for technical assistance.
Funding
This work was financially supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado São Paulo (FAPESP, Grants #2010/51730–0 and # 2009–11912–5), Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (CNPq), and Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM). We also acknowledge the US National Institutes of Health contract NIH RO1 GM051994–14 and personal NIH grant to HH #NIH K99-GM107355.
Reference
- 1. Goshima G, Wollman R, Goodwin SS, Zhang N, Scholey JM, Vale RD, Stuurman N. Genes required for mitotic spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells. Science 2007; 5823:417-21; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1141314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Uehara R, Nozawa RS, Tomioka A, Petry S, Vale RD, Obuse C, Goshima G. The augmin complex plays a critical role in spindle microtubule generation for mitotic progression and cytokinesis in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:6998-7003; PMID:19369198; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0901587106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dumont S, Mitchison TJ. Force and length in the mitotic spindle. Curr Biol 2009; 17:R749-61; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hayward D, Metz J, Pellacani C, Wakefield JG. Synergy between multiple microtubule-generating pathways confers robustness to centrosome-driven mitotic spindle formation. Dev Cell 2014; 1:81-93; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Luders J, Stearns T. Microtubule-organizing centres: a re-evaluation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:161-167; PMID:17245416; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Willard FS, Kimple RJ, Siderovski DP. Return of the GDI: the GoLoco motif in cell division. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:925-951; PMID:15189163; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kotak S, Gönczy P. Mechanisms of spindle positioning: cortical force generators in the limelight. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013; 6: 741-48; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zheng Z, Wan Q, Liu J, Zhu H, Chu X, Du Q. Evidence for dynein and astral microtubule-mediated cortical release and transport of Gαi/LGN/NuMA complex in mitotic cells. Mol Biol Cell 2013; 7:901-13; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93; PMID:17426725; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Noatynska A, Gotta M, Meraldi P. Mitotic spindle (DIS) orientation and DISease: cause or consequence? J Cell Biol 2012; 7:1025-35; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.201209015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. O′Connell MJ, Krien MJ, Hunter T. Never say never. The NIMA-related protein kinases in mitotic control. Trends Cell Biol 2003; 5:221-8; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00056-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. O′Regan L, Blot J, Fry AM. Mitotic regulation by NIMA-related kinases. Cell Div 2007; 29:2-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fry AM, O′Regan L, Sabir SR, Bayliss R. Cell cycle regulation by the NEK family of protein kinases. J Cell Sci 2012; 125:4423-4433; PMID:23132929; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/jcs.111195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Meirelles GV, Perez AM, de Souza EE, Basei FL, Papa PF, Hanchuk TDM, Cardoso VB, Kobarg J. "Stop Ne(c)king around:" How systems biology can help to characterize the functions of NEK family kinases from cell cycle regulation to DNA damage response. World J Biol Chem 2014; 5(2):141-160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Roig J, Groen A, Caldwell J, Avruch J. Active Nercc1 protein kinase concentrates at centrosomes early in mitosis and is necessary for proper spindle assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:4827-40; PMID:16079175; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yissachar N, Salem H, Tennenbaum T, Motro B. Nek7 kinase is enriched at the centrosome, and is required for proper spindle assembly and mitotic progression. FEBS Lett 2006; 27:6489-95; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.10.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kim S, Lee K. and Rhee K. NEK7 is a centrosomal kinase critical for microtubule nucleation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 1:56-62; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. O′Regan L, Fry AM. The Nek6 and Nek7 protein kinases are required for robust mitotic spindle formation and cytokinesis. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 14:3975-90; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.01867-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Belham C, Roig J, Caldwell JA, Aoyama Y, Kemp BE, Comb M, Avruch JA. mitotic cascade of NIMA family kinases. Nercc1/NEK9 activates the NEK6 and NEK7 kinases. J Biol Chem 2003; 37: 34897-909; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M303663200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Richards MW, O′Regan L, Mas-Droux C, Blot JM, Cheung J, Hoelder S, Fry AM, Bayliss R. An autoinhibitory tyrosine motif in the cell-cycle-regulated NEK7 kinase is released through binding of NEK9. Mol Cell. 2009; 4:560-70; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Quarmby LM, Mahjoub MR. Caught Nek-ing: cilia and centrioles. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:5161-69; PMID:16280549; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/jcs.02681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kim S, Rhee K. NEK7 is essential for centriole duplication and centrosomal accumulation of pericentriolar material proteins in interphase cells. J Cell Sci 2011; 124:3760-70; PMID:22100915; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/jcs.078089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Salem H, Rachmin I, Yissachar N, Cohen S, Amiel A, Haffner R, Lavi L, Motro B. Nek7 kinase targeting leads to early mortality, cytokinesis disturbance and polyploidy. Oncogene 2010; 28:4046-57; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/onc.2010.162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. de Souza EE, Meirelles GV, Godoy BB, Perez AM, Smetana JH, Doxsey SJ, McComb ME, Costello CE, Whelan SA, Kobarg J. Characterization of the human NEK7 interactome suggests catalytic and regulatory properties distinct from those of NEK6. J Proteome Res 2014; 13(9):4074-90; PMID:25093993; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1021/pr500437x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Abramow-Newerly M, Roy AA, Nunn C, Chidiac P. RGS proteins have a signalling complex: interactions between RGS proteins and GPCRs, effectors, and auxiliary proteins. Cell Signal 2006; 18:579-591; PMID:16226429; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bastin G, Heximer SP. Rab family proteins regulate the endosomal trafficking and function of RGS4. J Biol Chem. 2013; 30:21836-49; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M113.466888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Siderovski DP, Hessel A, Chung S, Mak TW, Tyers M. A new family of regulators of G-protein-coupled receptors? Curr Biol 1996; 2:211-2; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00454-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Keys JR, Greene EA, Koch WJ, Eckhart AD. Gq-coupled receptor agonists mediate cardiac hypertrophy via the vasculature. Hypertension 2002; 40:660-666; PMID:12411459; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1161/01.HYP.0000035397.73223.CE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wilkie TM, Kinch L. New roles for Gα and RGS proteins: communication continues despite pulling sisters apart. Curr Biol 2005; 15:843- 54; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hewavitharana T, Wedegaertner PB. Non-canonical signaling and localizations of heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell Signal 2012; 1:25-34; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lampson MA, Cheeseman IM. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol 2011; 3:133-40; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hochegger H, Hégarat N, Pereira-Leal JB. Aurora at the pole and equator: overlapping functions of Aurora kinases in the mitotic spindle. Open Biol 2013; 3:120185; PMID:23516109; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1098/rsob.120185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hehnly H, Doxsey S. Rab11 endosomes contribute to mitotic spindle organization and orientation. Dev Cell 2014; 28:497-507; PMID:24561039; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cowley DO, Rivera-Pérez JA, Schliekelman M, He YJ, Oliver TG, Lu L, O′Quinn R, Salmon ED, Magnuson T, Van Dyke T. Aurora-A kinase is essential for bipolar spindle formation and early development. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 4:1059-71; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.01062-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nagai T, Ikeda M, Chiba S, Kanno S, Mizuno K. Furry promotes acetylation of microtubules in the mitotic spindle by inhibition of SIRT2 tubulin deacetylase. J Cell Sci 2013; 19:4369-80; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/jcs.127209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zimmerman WC, Sillibourne J, Rosa J. and Doxsey SJ. Mitosis-specific anchoring of gamma tubulin complexes by pericentrin controls spindle organization and mitotic entry. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 8:3642-57; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1091/mbc.E03-11-0796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bornens M. The centrosome in cells and organisms. Science 2012; 335:422-426; PMID:22282802; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1209037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bouissou A, Vérollet C, de Forges H, Haren L, Bellaïche Y, Perez F, Merdes A, Raynaud-Messina B. γ-Tubulin ring complexes and EB1 play antagonistic roles in microtubule dynamics and spindle positioning. EMBO J 2014; 2:114-28; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/embj.201385967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Laan L, Pavin N, Husson J, Romet-Lemonne G, van Duijn M, López MP, Vale RD, Jülicher F, Reck-Peterson SL, Dogterom M. Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters. Cell 2012; 3:502-14; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Delaval B, Bright A, Lawson ND, Doxsey S. The cilia protein IFT88 is required for spindle orientation in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 4:461-8; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lu MS, Johnston CA. Molecular pathways regulating mitotic spindle orientation in animal cells. Development 2013; 9:1843-56; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.087627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cohen S, Aizer A, Shav-Tal Y, Yanai A, Motro B. Nek7 kinase accelerates microtubule dynamic instability. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1833:1104-13; PMID:23313050; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.12.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Welburn JP, Vleugel M, Liu D, Yates JR , Lampson MA, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol Cell 2010; 38(3):383-92; PMID:20471944; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Heo K, Ha SH, Chae YC, Lee S, Oh YS, Kim YH, Kim SH, Kim JH, Mizoguchi A, Itoh TJ, Kwon HM, Ryu SH. Suh PG RGS2 promotes formation of neurites by stimulating microtubule polymerization. Cell Signal 2006; 12:2182-92; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Blumer JB, Kuriyama R, Gettys TW, Lanier SM. The G-protein regulatory (GPR) motif-containing Leu-Gly-Asn-enriched protein (LGN) and Gialpha3 influence cortical positioning of the mitotic spindle poles at metaphase in symmetrically dividing mammalian cells. Eur J Cell Biol 2006; 12:1233-40; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Woodard, Geoffrey E, Ning-Na Huang, Hyeseon Cho, Toru Miki, Gregory G Tall, and Kehrl John H. Ric-8A and Gi Alpha recruit LGN, NuMA, and dynein to the cell cortex to help orient the mitotic spindle. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 14: 3519-30; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.00394-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Upadhya P, Birkenmeier EH, Birkenmeier CS, Barker JE. Mutations in a NIMA-related kinase gene, Nek1, cause peliotropic effects including a progressive polycystic kidney disease in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:217-221; PMID:10618398; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.97.1.217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zalli D, Bayliss R, Fry AM. The Nek8 protein kinase, mutated in the human cystic kidney disease nephronophthisis, is both activated and degraded during ciliogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2012; 5:1155-71; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/hmg/ddr544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Moniz L, Dutt P, Haider N, Stambolic V. Nek family of kinases in cell cycle, checkpoint control and cancer. Cell Div 2011; 1:18; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1747-1028-6-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kawamura E, Fielding AB, Kannan N, Balgi A, Eaves CJ, Roberge M, Dedhar S. Identification of novel small molecule inhibitors of centrosome clustering in cancer cells. Oncotarget 2013; 4: 1763-76; PMID:24091544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sanhaji M, Ritter A, Belsham HR, Friel CT, Roth S, Louwen F, Yuan J. Polo-like kinase 1 regulates the stability of the mitotic centromere-associated kinesin in mitosis. Oncotarget 2014; 5: 3130-44; PMID:24931513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Carazzolle MF, de Carvalho LM, Slepicka HH, Vidal RO, Pereira GA, Kobarg J, Meirelles GV. IIS - Integrated Interactome System: a web-based platform for the annotation, analysis and visualization of protein-metabolite-gene-drug interactions by integrating a variety of data sources and tools. PLoS One 2014; 9(6):e100385; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0100385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 11:2498-2504; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Thoma CR, Toso A, Gutbrodt KL, Reggi SP, Frew IJ, Schraml P, Hergovich A, Moch H, Meraldi P, Krek W. VHL loss causes spindle misorientation and chromosome instability. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 8:994-1001; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb1912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.