Abstract
Purpose
Cryopreservation of testicular tissue with subsequent re-implantation after therapy has fertility perseveration potential for pre-pubertal boys with childhood cancer. We present the histology and the feasibility of testicular tissue procurement for this novel approach.
Patients and Methods
We performed a prospective cohort study of boys at significant risk for treatment-associated gonadotoxicity who were eligible for an experimental research protocol between 2008 and 2011. Open testicular biopsy was performed while they were anesthetized for another treatment related procedure. Half of the specimen was reserved for cryopreservation, while the other half was used for research purposes. Semi-thin sections of the biopsy specimens were evaluated for histological features and compared to age-adjusted reference values.
Results
Of the 34 boys who underwent biopsy between March 2008 and October 2011, 29 had solid tumors and 5 underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for benign disease. Of these, 27 had adequate tissue for histologic analysis. The median age of the boys was 8.7 years (IQR=2.2 – 11.5 years). All children had either normal (81.5%) or increased (18.5%) numbers of normal germ cells per tubules for their age. However, 18.5% (5/27) of boys had no evidence of Adult dark (Ad) spermatogonia, and 56% (9/16) of boys had no evidence of primary spermatocytes on biopsy, that would be expected for their age norms. These findings are suggestive of abnormal germ cell maturation.
Conclusion
The preliminary histologic findings of abnormal spermatogenesis maturation in testes of pre-pubertal boys with cancer warrants further investigation.
Keywords: fertility preservation, childhood cancer, testicular biopsy, spermatogenesis
Introduction
Advances in therapy for children with cancer during the past several decades have resulted in dramatic improvements in long-term survival. Unfortunately, anti-cancer therapies often induce adverse effects in normal tissues and may cause significant long-term sequelae. For instance, exposure to high cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide often results in azospermia and decreased fertility potential in males1. Radiation exposure, including total body irradiation conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), can also impair spermatogenesis2. Given the success of modern anti-cancer therapies, greater focus has been placed upon longer-term quality of life and survivorship issues, such as fertility preservation in childhood cancer patients.
For post-pubertal adolescents and young men, sperm banking is a viable option and is available at most cancer centers. However, successful collection of a mature sperm specimen is not possible for pre-pubertal and peri-pubertal boys. Alternative techniques for fertility preservation for these younger patients are under active investigation in the research setting, but are not currently available clinically3.
Our multi-disciplinary group at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) is investigating the feasibility of an experimental protocol that involves cryopreservation of testicular tissue specimens with the possibility for subsequent re-implantation of viable germ cells after completion of gonadotoxic therapy in selected patients4. While this technique has the potential to preserve fertility for pre-pubescent boys, several questions remain prior to clinical implementation. To address these issues, our group has previously demonstrated successful xenogeneic transplantation of human spermatogonial stem cells (SSC) into the seminiferous tubules of immunodeficient mice5. We have also reported the safety of the testicular biopsy procedure and the informed consent and participation willingness by parents for this experimental protocol4,6.
In the current study, we report the preliminary histologic findings of testicular biopsies obtained from pre-pubertal males prior to the initiation of gonadotoxic therapy. Our a priori hypothesis was that these specimens will demonstrate normal histology for age.
Materials & Methods
Study Design and Population
We performed a prospective cohort study of all pre-pubertal males and peri-pubertal males at significant risk of treatment-associated gonadotoxicity who were unable to bank sperm and underwent open testicular biopsy between 2008 and 2011. Our protocol and the subject recruitment process have been previously described in detail6.
Briefly, all subjects had been diagnosed with solid tumors (e.g., sarcoma, neuroblastoma) or were to undergo HSCT for non-malignant diseases (e.g., aplastic anemia, immunodeficiency). Patients with hematologic malignancies were excluded from this study due to the need to start immediate anti-cancer treatment and the risk of testicular involvement with leukemia. Patients with coagulopathy, cryptorchidism, or known testicular involvement with cancer were also excluded.
Testis biopsy protocol
An open testicular biopsy was performed while patients were under anesthesia for another treatment-related operation, such as central line placement or bone marrow biopsy. Per protocol, testicular biopsies were never a primary procedure so as to minimize the risk of anesthesia exposure. All testicular biopsies occurred prior to initiation of anti-cancer treatment or HSCT conditioning. One-half of each biopsy specimen was cryopreserved at the Penn Fertility Care of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for potential clinical use by the patient at a later date as previously described6.
The other half of the testicular biopsy was further divided into two specimens. The larger specimen was reserved for isolation of SSCs for research purposes. The remaining tissue was submitted for routine histopathologic analysis at CHOP, and these data are reported in this study. After fixation in 2% glutaraldehyde, the specimens were embedded in bisphenol A diglycidyl ether epoxy resin and then sectioned every 0.4 microns. The semi-thin sections were then stained with toluene blue. Histological analysis was performed using light microscopy at 600x total magnification (Figure 1). At least 50 tubular cross sections of the specimen were examined.
Figure 1.
Microscopy pictures of two pre-pubertal testicular biopsy specimens.
A demonstrates age-expected maturation to primary spermatocytes. (Arrow indicates primary spermatocytes)
B shows a specimen with maturation arrest at Ad spermatogonia and Adult pale spermatogonia stages, which is inappropriate for patient age.
Statistical Analysis
All data were prospectively collected. The primary outcome variable was total number of germ cells per tubule. The secondary outcome variables were numbers of gonocytes, adult dark (Ad) spermatogonia, and primary spermatocytes. Also reported was presence of Leydig cells, testicular fibrosis, tubular atrophy, microlithiasis, and carcinoma in situ. The primary predictor variable was clinical diagnosis. Other predictor variables included patient age and race/ethnicity.
A standardized template was used to reduce any variability between reporting pathologists. The total number of germ cells per tubule was reported as an ordinal variable: reduced, mildly reduced, normal, or increased based upon an age-adjusted reference value chart7. This chart had been created based on testicular biopsies from 94 normally descended testes7. The remaining histological variables were dichotomous: present, absent, or unable to be determined. Using the reference chart and biopsy results of the contralateral testis in patients with unilateral undescended testis, we estimated that 95% of our cohort should have a normal appearing testicular biopsy for their age. Given our sample size of 27 patients, we estimated a power of 86% to detect a 20% difference between our cohort and the age-adjusted references7.
Statistical analyses were performed with Stata 13.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) using median values and interquartile range (IQR), for continuous variables. Proportions were used for categorical variables. Our research protocol was approved by the CHOP Institutional Research Board. Informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians per the Declaration of Helsinki.
Results
Thirty-four male children and adolescents were enrolled and underwent open testicular biopsy. While all patients had adequate testicular tissue for viable cryopreservation, 7 specimens had insufficient tissue for histopathologic analysis and were thus excluded. Of the 27 specimens available for analysis, the median age of the patients was 8.7 years (IQR=2.2 – 11.5 years). Twenty-three (85.2%) of the 27 boys were non-Hispanic Caucasians.
As shown in Table 1, cancer diagnoses included neuroblastoma (n = 6), Ewing sarcoma (n = 5), osteosarcoma (n = 3), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2), synovial sarcoma (n = 2), pleuropulmonary blastoma (n = 1), rhabdoid tumor (n = 1), and chondrosarcoma (n = 1). An additional child initially diagnosed with osteosarcoma underwent testicular biopsy per protocol at time of tumor biopsy, but was subsequently found to have a benign aneurysmal bone cyst instead of cancer. His data are included in Table 2.
Table 1.
Histologic findings for children with cancer
| Age | Diagnosis | Total germ cell per tubules |
Presence of Ad spermatogonia |
Presence of primary spermatocytes |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months | Pleuropulmonary blastoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 6 months | Ewing sarcoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 7 months | Neuroblastoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 1.3 years | Rhabdomyosarcoma | Increased | Yes | No | |
| 2.2 years | Neuroblastoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 2.3 years | Neuroblastoma | Increased | Yes | No | |
| 2.8 years | Neuroblastoma | Increased | No | No | |
| 3.8 years | Neuroblastoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 4.3 years | Rhabdoid tumor | Increased | Yes | Yes | |
| 6.9 years | Neuroblastoma | Normal | No | No | |
| 8.8 years | Rhabdomyosarcoma | Normal | Yes | Yes | |
| 9.8 years | Synovial sarcoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 9.9 years | Ewing sarcoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 9.9 years | Chondrosarcoma | Increased | Yes | No | |
| 10.3 years | Ewing sarcoma | Normal | No | No | |
| 10.7 years | Ewing sarcoma | Normal | Yes | Yes | |
| 11.5 years | Osteosarcoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 12.5 years | Ewing sarcoma | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 12.7 years | Osteosarcoma | Normal | Yes | Yes | |
| 13.1 years | Osteosarcoma | Normal | Yes | Yes | |
| 17.8 years | Synovial sarcoma | Normal | No | Yes | |
Table 2.
Histologic findings for children with non-cancer diagnoses
| Age | Diagnosis | Total germ cell per tubules |
Presence of Ad spermatogonia |
Presence of primary spermatocytes |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 months | Chronic granulomatous disease | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 5.4 years | Aplastic anemia | Normal | No | No | |
| 8.7 years | Interferon-gamma immunodeficiency | Normal | Yes | No | |
| 11.9 years | Aplastic anemia | Normal | Yes | Yes | |
| 12.8 years | Aplastic anemia | Normal | Yes | Yes | |
| 12.4 years | Aneurysmal bone cyst* | Normal | Yes | No | |
Pre-biopsy diagnosis was osteosarcoma, but the lesion was subsequently found to be benign.
Five children with non-malignant diseases awaiting HSCT underwent testicular biopsies for this study (Table 2). Histological analysis of the 27 specimens revealed that 22 children (81.5%) had normal germ cells per tubules for age, while the remaining 5 children (18.5%) had increased germ cell counts. All children with increased numbers of germ cells per tubule had cancer diagnoses. Of the boys older than 6 months for whom Ad spermatogonia would be expected for their age, 5/26 (19%) boys had no evidence of Ad spermatogonia. Primary spermatocytes are usually seen in children older than six years; however, 56% (9/16) of children who were older than 6 years had no evidence of primary spermatocytes on biopsy.
The presence of fetal gonocytes beyond 6 months of age is another indicator of abnormal maturation8. Fetal gonocytes were not seen in any testicular specimens. Leydig cells were present in specimens from 24 children (89%), absent in one (3.7%), and could not be determined in two specimens (7.4%). The patient with absent Leydig cells was a 10 year old with Ewing sarcoma, who also had histologic evidence of testicular fibrosis and atrophy. The 9-year-old patient with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma also had evidence of microlithiasis of unclear clinical significance. No testicular biopsy specimen had metastatic cancer involvement or intra-tubular germ cell neoplasia.
Discussion
Our long-term goal is to re-transplant cryopreserved SSC back into the seminiferous tubules of the patients following completion of gonadotoxic anticancer therapy. Although others and we have made progress towards achieving this goal, further work is required to assess the clinical potential of this experimental technique9.In particular, determination of whether the germ cells harvested from pre-pubertal patients with cancer have normal age-expected histology requires further assessment.
In our histologic analyses of pre- and peri-pubertal boys about to undergo gonadotoxic anti-cancer therapy, we did not detect a difference in the number germ cell per tubules for age in any specimen compared to reference values. However, we also noted an age-adjusted maturation delay of spermatogenesis. Nearly 20% of specimens from patients greater than 6 months of age lacked Ad spermatogonia that would be expected for age norms. Similarly, 56.3% of biopsies had no evidence of primary spermatocytes on biopsy when it would be expected for their age8, 10.
The clinical significance of the lack of Ad spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes observed in these patients remains uncertain. However, in boys with history of cryptorchidism, the lack of Ad spermatogonia on testis biopsy has been correlated with subsequent abnormal semen analyses11. The reduced fertility in cryptorchid boys has been hypothesized to be attributable to maturation arrest, more specifically from failed transformation of gonocytes into Ad spermatogonia8. However, the pathologic data from cryptorchid patients to those of our study patients may not be directly comparable and must be interpreted with caution11.
Although gonadotoxic therapy is a well-recognized cause of reduced fertility, there may be other underlying causes for impaired spermatogenesis in the setting of malignancy. The possible non-treatment related mechanisms are poorly understood but are likely multi-factorial12. Proposed theories for impaired spermatogenesis in malignant diseases are pre-existing defects in germ cells, local and systemic tumor effects, and alterations of the endocrine and immune systems12. Another hypothesis is that impaired spermatogenesis results from increased pro-inflammatory cytokines related to the child’s stress response to the disease state13, 14.
If boys with serious childhood diseases truly have delayed maturation in spermatogenesis, future re-implantation of testicular tissue may not result in successful clinical fertility. However, ex vivo maturation of spermatogenesis with subsequent intracytoplasmic sperm injection may overcome this and also circumvent the need for more invasive surgical re-implantation of cryopreserved testicular tissue3.
While our pilot study does not evaluate the clinical potential of this experimental fertility-preserving technique, obvious concerns exist regarding the re-implantation of tissue obtained from children with cancer prior to treatment. In our study, no patient had microscopic evidence of testicular involvement with primary tumor, minimizing the potential risk of inadvertent transplantation of viably cryopreserved cancer cells.
Another concern about this experimental protocol is the risk of overtreating patients by adding an additional surgical procedure of possibly limited or no benefit to the patient. Not every cancer treatment results in gonadotoxicity, although it remains somewhat difficult to predict a priori which patients will experience reduced fertility due to anti-cancer or pre-HSCT therapy. We limited study enrollment to children receiving therapies associated with the greatest risk of gonadotoxicity, but cannot be certain that every patient included in this study will ultimately experience reduced fertility related to cancer treatment.
Our study has several limitations. It is a relatively small and heterogeneous cohort with respect to age and underlying diagnosis. We could not control for Tanner stage or other clinical parameters of puberty, as this was not prospectively recorded. Initial histologic analysis was not centrally performed, and the reviewing pathologists were not blinded to the patients’ clinical history, which may introduce expectation bias. It was also not possible to compare biopsy specimens from our study patients to normal controls, as it would place healthy patients at unnecessary risk from anesthesia and invasive procedures. However, we compared our cohort to reference values based upon 94 children with normally descended testes undergoing biopsy for various reasons7. These data were obtained from children with scrotal/inguinal pathology and 33 children at autopsy for unreported causes of death. Since these reference values were not obtained from truly “healthy” controls, the delayed maturation observed in our cohort may represent an even greater deviation from normal spermatogenesis
Conclusion
Cryopreservation of testicular tissue with subsequent surgical re-implantation is a novel experimental approach that may allow future fertility for children following chemotherapy or HSCT. Preliminary testicular histologic analyses demonstrate normal to increased levels of germ cells; however, an age-adjusted delayed maturation of spermatogenesis was observed in many of these biopsy specimens. Further investigation regarding the impact of these preliminary histologic findings is warranted with the goal of improving future fertility for children treated with gonadotoxic therapies.
Acknowledgments
Funding: NICHD HD061217, St. Baldrick’s Foundation Consortium Research Grant, NIH/NCI K08CA184418 (SKT), Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation Center of Excellence award (SKT).
Key of Definitions for Abbreviations
- Ad
adult dark
- CHOP
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
- HSCT
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
- IQR
interquartile range (IQR)
- SSCs
spermatogonial stem cells
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our subscribers we are providing this early version of the article. The paper will be copy edited and typeset, and proof will be reviewed before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to The Journal pertain.
Conflicts of Interest: None to Disclose
References
- 1.Meistrich ML. Male gonadal toxicity. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:261–266. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brougham MF, Wallace WH. Subfertility in children and young people treated for solid and haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol. 2005;131:143–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wyns C, Curaba M, Vanabelle B, Van Langendonckt A, Donnez J. Options for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:312–328. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ginsberg JP, Li Y, Carlson CA, et al. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal male children: an analysis of parental decision-making. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1673–1678. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagano M, Patrizio P, Brinster RL. Long-term survival of human spermatogonial stem cells in mouse testes. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:1225–1233. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04345-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ginsberg JP, Carlson CA, Lin K, et al. An experimental protocol for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys recently diagnosed with cancer: a report of acceptability and safety. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:37–41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hadziselimovic F, Herzog B, Buser M. Development of cryptorchid testes. Eur J Pediatr. 1987;146(Suppl 2):S8–S12. doi: 10.1007/BF00452859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huff DS, Fenig DM, Canning DA, Carr MG, Zderic SA, Snyder HM., 3rd Abnormal germ cell development in cryptorchidism. Horm Res. 2001;55:11–17. doi: 10.1159/000049957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu X, Schmidt JA, Avarbock MR, et al. Prepubertal human spermatogonia and mouse gonocytes share conserved gene expression of germline stem cell regulatory molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:21672–21677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912432106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nistal M, Paniagua R. Occurrence of primary spermatocytes in the infant and child testis. Andrologia. 1984;16:532–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1984.tb00409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hadziselimovic F, Hoecht B. Testicular histology related to fertility outcome and postpubertal hormone status in cryptorchidism. Klin Padiatr. 2008;220:302–307. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. Disruption of spermatogenesis by the cancer disease process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005:9–12. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hales DB, Diemer T, Hales KH. Role of cytokines in testicular function. Endocrine. 1999;10:201–217. doi: 10.1007/BF02738619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Slopen N, Koenen KC, Kubzansky LD. Childhood adversity and immune and inflammatory biomarkers associated with cardiovascular risk in youth: a systematic review. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:239–250. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

