Abstract
Many plants synchronize their flowering times with changing seasons to maximize reproductive success. A key seasonal cue is the change in day length (photoperiod), that induces the production of a systemic flowering signaling molecule called florigen. A major florigen component is FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) or its orthologs. In the long-day plant Arabidopsis thaliana, FT expression is well known to be activated by the photoperiod pathway output specifically near dusk in long days; however, underappreciated is the importance of FT silencing at other times of the day, in enabling Arabidopsis to respond only to long days in flowering. We have recently reported that a plant-specific chromatin-silencing complex called EMF1c represses FT expression at times other than around dusk in long days to prevent its temporal ectopic expression from “spoiling” the long-day floral induction in Arabidopsis. Here I further discuss in other day-length sensitive plants the potential involvement of a chromatin mechanism similar to the Arabidopsis EMF1c-mediated silencing, in repressing the expression of FT orthologs to enable diverse photoperiodic control of flowering.
Keywords: photoperiod pathway, flowering time, chromatin silencing, FT, EMF1c, PRC1, Histone 3 lysine-27 trimethylation
Abbreviations
- EMF1
EMBRYONIC FLOWER 1
- FT
FLOWERING LOCUS T
- CO
CONSTANS
- NF-Y
nuclear factor Y
- H3K27me3
Histone 3 lysine-27 trimethylation
- PcG
Polycomb group
- PRC1
Polycomb repressive complex 1
- PRC2
Polycomb repressive complex 2
- H2Aub
Histone 2A monoubiquitination
- LHP1
LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1
Many plants synchronize their timing of developmental transition from vegetative to reproductive growth (i.e., flowering) with changing seasons to maximize reproductive success. A key seasonal cue is the change in day length (photoperiod) at different times of the year, quite noticeable at higher latitudes.1,2 Through a photoperiod pathway of floral induction, plants sense such cue to flower at a right season.2 According to their flowering responses to photoperiodic changes, plants are classified into long-day, short-day and day-neutral plants. Long-day plants flower when days getting longer than a threshold length or flower rapidly in long days, whereas short-day plants flower when the day becomes shorter; plants that flower regardless of day length changes are day-neutral.1
The day-length changes are perceived in leaves by photoreceptors such as phytochrome and cryptochrome.3,4 Upon perception of inductive photoperiods, plants produce a systemic flowering signaling molecule called florigen in leaf phloem tissues, which is subsequently transported through the phloem to shoot apex to induce flowering.5-7 A key component of the mobile florigen is FT, first discovered in the model flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana and conserved among flowering plants so far examined.2,8,9 In the long-day plant Arabidopsis, FT expression is activated by the photoperiod pathway output CONSTANS (CO).10 In long days, CO mRNA expression is set at a high level during late afternoon by the interplay of several circadian clock-controlled activities of gene regulation.10 The coincidence of high-level CO mRNAs with light exposure that stabilizes the CO protein, results in CO accumulation in leaf veins in late afternoon (peaking at the end of long day).3,11 CO forms a complex with nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) proteins to promote FT expression specifically in the phloem near dusk.12,13 This CO-triggered FT expression near dusk is well known to be essential for floral induction in Arabidopsis by the long-day photoperiods; however, underappreciated is the importance of FT silencing at other times of the day (i.e., prior to late afternoon and after dusk), in enabling Arabidopsis to respond to long days in floral induction.
The silencing of gene expression through covalent chromatin modifications plays a crucial role in eukaryotic gene regulation. Various repressive modifications of the chromatin constituents including DNA and histones such as DNA methylation and Histone 3 lysine-27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) can lead to gene silencing.14,15 The repressive H3K27me3 is deposited by a Polycomb group (PcG) protein complex.14 PcG proteins assemble into two main families of complex including Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), to modify chromatin leading to transcriptional repression of gene expression.14 PRC2, conserved from plants to animals, catalyzes H3K27me3, whereas PRC1 typically acts to maintain this mark, catalyze another repressive modification-Histone 2A monoubiquitination (H2Aub), and/or compact chromatin to repress gene expression.14,16 PcG complex-mediated chromatin silencing plays a critical role in developmental gene regulation in plants and animals.
The expression control of florigen gene FT involves not only CO-triggered activation, but also chromatin silencing mechanisms. In Arabidopsis, a PRC2 complex catalyzes H3K27me3 at the FT locus, and is required for FT repression;17 moreover, LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 (LHP1) recognizes and binds to H3K27me3 and mediates FT silencing.18 In addition, a JmjC domain-containing H3 lysine-4 demethylase known as JMJ14 /PKDM7B localizes at the FT locus to mediate H3K4 demethylation and repress FT expression.19,20 Recently, we have uncovered that LHP1 and JMJ14 are part of a PcG complex that silences FT expression.21
In plants and animals PRC2 subunits are well conserved, but there are no apparent homologs of most animal PRC1 components in plants.16,22 In quest for a plant PcG complex with PRC1-like activities, we have uncovered that the plant-specific EMBRYONIC FLOWER 1 (EMF1) protein,23 LHP1, JMJ14 and a homolog of the human PRC1 subunit BMI114 are part of a PcG complex termed as EMF1c that plays PRC1-like roles to mediate gene repression in Arabidopsis.21 EMF1 is a core subunit and possesses a chromatin compaction activity inhibitory of transcription, a key function of animal PRC1.24 EMF1c is expected to maintain the repressive H3K27me3 mark, erase the active H3K4me3, deposit the repressive H2Aub, and /or compact target gene chromatin, leading to the silencing of various genes in the Arabidopsis genome.21
To explore the biological function of EMF1c-PcG in photoperiodic flowering control, we undertook a genetic approach by knocking down the core complex subunit EMF1 in leaf phloem tissues21 where FT expression is activated by CO specifically near dusk in long days. This phloem-specific knockdown resulted in largely constitutive FT expression across day and night (from dawn to dusk to dawn again).21 Apparently, EMF1c is essential for keeping FT silenced. The EMF1-knockdown plants flowered rapidly and around the same time under long-day and short-day conditions21 (note that Arabidopsis typically flowers rapidly in long days, whereas the short-day condition inhibits its flowering); in other words, these plants became day-neutral, and flowered rapidly regardless of day length conditions. Loss of EMF1c function in the leaf phloem tissues converted Arabidopsis from a long-day plant to day-neutral plant. Therefore, in Arabidopsis EMF1c-mediated FT silencing enables the photoperiodic control of flowering (i.e., long-day induction of the floral transition).
We have further determined at what times of the day (in long days) EMF1c acts to silence FT expression by examining the temporal localization pattern of EMF1 at the FT locus. In the morning, EMF1 binds to FT chromatin to silence FT expression.21 When the day advances, CO starts to accumulate in late afternoon with a peak at dusk; CO, together with a dimer of NF-YB and NF-YC, forms a trimer (CO-NF-Y) that binds directly to the FT promoter to disrupt EMF1 binding to FT chromatin, as suggested by the ectopic accumulation of CO in the morning resulting in an elimination of EMF1 binding to FT chromatin.21 This CO-triggered reduction of EMF1 abundance at the FT locus gives rise to FT expression activation near dusk to induce flowering, conferring a long-day flowering induction in Arabidopsis.21 When it reaches night, the CO protein is degraded rapidly by proteasomes, EMF1/EMF1c comes back to FT chromatin again to silence FT expression.21 In short, FT repression at times other than around dusk in long days is not by default, but achieved by ‘active’ EMF1c-mediated chromatin silencing. This silencing is relieved only when the CO level reaches a threshold near dusk; thus, it creates a situation where only long days can induce the florigen expression because of the silencing breaker – CO reaching a threshold level only near the end of day time (Fig. 1). FT silencing at other times of the day prevents its temporal ectopic expression from ‘spoiling’ the long-day floral induction in Arabidopsis; in other words, EMF1c-mediated FT silencing enables such photoperiodic response of flowering.
Figure 1.
A working model for the chromatin silencing of FT expression in Arabidopsis by the phloem EMF1c-PcG in long days. EMF1c-PcG silences FT expression at times other than around dusk, and the silencing is relieved only when the CO level reaches a threshold near dusk, as CO functions to disrupt EMF1-PcG binding to FT chromatin.21 This disrupted binding is indicated by the dotted line; solid lines with bars denote repression or disruption.
The EMF1c components including EMF1, LHP1, JMJ14 and BMI1s are widely conserved in angiosperms.21,23,25-27 This raises a possibility that EMF1c-mediated silencing of FT (or FT orthologs) might be conserved in other day-length sensitive plants as well. In the model short-day plant Oryza sativa (rice), the expression of an FT ortholog called Hd3a that plays a key role in rice floral induction,28 is activated around dawn in short days (8-hour light /16-hour night) by concerted action of a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis CO and a B-type response regulator known as Ehd1 (see illustration in Fig. 2).1,29,30 It would be interesting to determine whether in rice there is an EMF1c-like PcG complex with subunit composition and function similar to the Arabidopsis EMF1c, which silences Hd3a expression at times other than around dawn to enable short-day induction of rice flowering (Fig. 2). Future study of the role of EMF1c-like complexes in silencing of FT orthologs in various long-day and short-day plants will further our understanding of whether EMF1c-mediated silencing of FT or FT orthologs in leaf veins is a general feature in enabling photoperiodic control of flowering in angiosperms.
Figure 2.
A hypothetic model for chromatin silencing of the rice Hd3a expression by an EMF1c-PcG like complex in short days. In the indicated short days, Hd3a expression is activated around dawn1 (by a concerted action of Ehd1 and Hd1, a CO ortholog), and at times other than around dawn it might be silenced by an EMF1c-PcG like complex to prevent its temporal ectopic expression from ‘spoiling’ rice floral induction only by short days.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
- 1.Song YH, Shim JS, Kinmonth-Schultz HA, Imaizumi T. Photoperiodic flowering: time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2014; 66:441-64 PMID:25534513, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-115555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Turck F, Fornara F, Coupland G. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008; 59:573-94; PMID:18444908; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valverde F, Mouradov A, Soppe W, Ravenscroft D, Samach A, Coupland G. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 2004; 303:1003-6; PMID:14963328; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1091761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li X, Wang Q, Yu X, Liu H, Yang H, Zhao C, Liu X, Tan C, Klejnot J, Zhong D, et al.. Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2 (CRY2) functions by the photoactivation mechanism distinct from the tryptophan (trp) triad-dependent photoreduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:20844-9; PMID:22139370; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1114579108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, Giakountis A, Farrona S, Gissot L, Turnbull C, et al.. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 2007; 316:1030-3; PMID:17446353; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1141752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jaeger KE, Wigge PA. FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 2007; 17:1050-4; PMID:17540569; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mathieu J, Warthmann N, Kuttner F, Schmid M. Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral induction in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 2007; 17:1055-60; PMID:17540570; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 1999; 286:1962-5; PMID:10583961; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.286.5446.1962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 1999; 286:1960-2; PMID:10583960; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.286.5446.1960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature 2002; 419:308-12; PMID:12239570; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature00996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Song YH, Estrada DA, Johnson RS, Kim SK, Lee SY, MacCoss MJ, Imaizumi T. Distinct roles of FKF1, GIGANTEA, and ZEITLUPE proteins in the regulation of CONSTANS stability in Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:17672-7; PMID:25422419; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1415375111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wenkel S, Turck F, Singer K, Gissot L, Le Gourrierec J, Samach A, Coupland G. CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006; 18:2971-84; PMID:17138697; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.106.043299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cao S, Kumimoto RW, Gnesutta N, Calogero AM, Mantovani R, Holt BF 3rd. A distal CCAAT/NUCLEAR FACTOR Y complex promotes chromatin looping at the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter and regulates the timing of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014; 26:1009-17; PMID:24610724; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.113.120352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simon JA, Kingston RE. Mechanisms of Polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:697-708; PMID:19738629; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrn2731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang H, Zhu JK. RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2011; 14:142-7; PMID:21420348; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Butenko Y, Ohad N. Polycomb-group mediated epigenetic mechanisms through plant evolution. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1809:395-406; PMID:21664995; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang D, Wang Y, Wang Y, He Y. Repression of FLOWERING LOCUS C and FLOWERING LOCUS T by the Arabidopsis Polycomb repressive complex 2 components. PLoS ONE 2008; 3:e3404; PMID:18852898; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0003404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Turck F, Roudier F, Farrona S, Martin-Magniette ML, Guillaume E, Buisine N, Gagnot S, Martienssen RA, Coupland G, Colot V. Arabidopsis TFL2/LHP1 specifically associates with genes marked by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. PLoS Genet 2007; 3:e86; PMID:17542647; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jeong JH, Song HR, Ko JH, Jeong YM, Kwon YE, Seol JH, Amasino RM, Noh B, Noh YS. Repression of FLOWERING LOCUS T chromatin by functionally redundant histone H3 lysine 4 demethylases in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2009; 4:e8033; PMID:19946624; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0008033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang W, Jiang D, Jiang J, He Y. A plant-specific histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase represses the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2010; 62:663-73; PMID:20202164; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04182.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Y, Gu X, Yuan W, Schmitz RJ, He Y. Photoperiodic control of the floral transition through a distinct polycomb repressive complex. Dev Cell 2014; 28:727-36; PMID:24613395; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Molitor A, Shen WH. The Polycomb complex PRC1: composition and function in plants. J Genet Genomics 2013; 40:231-8; PMID:23706298; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aubert D, Chen L, Moon YH, Martin D, Castle LA, Yang CH, Sung ZR. EMF1, a novel protein involved in the control of shoot architecture and flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2001; 13:1865-75; PMID:11487698; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.13.8.1865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beh LY, Colwell LJ, Francis NJ. A core subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 1 is broadly conserved in function but not primary sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:E1063-71; PMID:22517748; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1118678109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gaudin V, Libault M, Pouteau S, Juul T, Zhao G, Lefebvre D, Grandjean O. Mutations in LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 affect flowering time and plant architecture in Arabidopsis. Development 2001; 128:4847-58; PMID:11731464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhou X, Ma H. Evolutionary history of histone demethylase families: distinct evolutionary patterns suggest functional divergence. BMC Evol Biol 2008; 8:294; PMID:18950507; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2148-8-294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bratzel F, Lopez-Torrejon G, Koch M, Del Pozo JC, Calonje M. Keeping cell identity in Arabidopsis requires PRC1 RING-finger homologs that catalyze H2A monoubiquitination. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1853-9; PMID:20933424; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tamaki S, Matsuo S, Wong HL, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 2007; 316:1033-6; PMID:17446351; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1141753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Monna L, Sasaki T, Araki T, Yano M. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 2002; 43:1096-105; PMID:12407188; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcf156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, Yamanouchi U, Kubo T, Shimatani Z, Yano M, Yoshimura A. Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev 2004; 18:926-36; PMID:15078816; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gad.1189604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- **Wang Y, Gu X, Yuan W, Schmitz R, He Y. Photoperiodic control of the floral transition through a distinct Polycomb repressive complex. Dev Cell 2014; 28:727-36; PMID:24613395; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]