Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer still carries a high mortality rate and remains the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in the USA, despite decades of research. Hence, there is considerable interest in developing biomarkers that could be used to stratify patients for subsequent treatment. Mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene occurs very frequently (~96%) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. However, loss of p53 has not proven to be a reliable prognostic marker. Recent evidence indicates that the truncated p53 protein isoforms can regulate activated p53 and thus may play a role in tumorigenesis. In the article by Hofstetter et al., the authors examined the relationship between the expression of two p53 isoforms (Δ133p53 and Δ40p53) and prognosis in patients with serous ovarian cancer. Their findings indicate that Δ133p53 constitutes an independent prognostic marker for improved recurrence-free and overall survival. Intriguingly, this relationship was observed in patients whose tumors expressed a mutant p53, suggesting that Δ133p53 might suppress the actions of mutant p53. The mutational status of p53 alone did not have prognostic significance. These studies suggest that mutant p53 activity may be counteracted by Δ133p53, which leads to a more favorable prognosis in advanced serous ovarian carcinomas. Novel therapeutic approaches could be built upon these findings.
Keywords: biomarker, ovarian cancer, p53 isoforms, p73, prognosis
Summary of methods & results
The objective of the studies was to evaluate the clinical relevance of p53 (Δ133p53, Δ40p53 and full-length p53 [FLp53]) and p73 isoforms (TAp73 and ΔTAp73) as potential prognostic markers in advanced serous ovarian cancer. The cohort of patients for this study consisted of 154 patients diagnosed with primary advanced serous ovarian cancer, providing a uniform patient population with most (81.8%) presenting with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III disease. A small fraction (18.2%) presented with stage IV disease. Most tumors (72.7%) were poorly differentiated and most (87.8%) underwent platinum-based chemotherapy after surgical debulking of the tumor. The median follow-up was 24.5 months.
A molecular analysis was conducted on tissue samples collected at the time of diagnosis. RNA was isolated from frozen tumor specimens and subjected to real-time PCR after reverse transcription using primer sets for p53 (Δ40p53, Δ133p53 and FLp53) and p73 isoforms (TAp73 and ΔTAp73) to quantitate p53 and p73 isoforms. p53 mutational status was determined by sequencing the p53 gene and confirming that p53 was inactive using a functional yeast-based assay. The resulting values for p53 and p73 isoforms were used to fractionate samples into two groups, a high-expressing group and a low-expressing group. The χ2-test was used to examine the relationship between isoform expression and clinicopathologic parameters.
The results suggested a significant correlation between Δ133p53 expression levels and survival. Specifically, on multivariate analysis, Δ133p53 was an independent prognostic factor for both recurrence-free and overall survival in 121 patients who had p53-mutant ovarian cancer. High Δ133p53 levels imparted a 43% reduction in the risk of recurrence and a 64% reduction in the risk of death compared with patients whose tumors had low Δ133p53 levels. The near association between platinum resistance and Δ133p53 levels in p53-mutant cases, with 34.4% of patients with low Δ133p53 levels failing to respond to platinum therapy, is intriguing.
Expression of the Δ40p53 isoform on univariate analysis imparted an improved recurrence-free survival in patients whose tumors had wild-type p53, and this finding was associated with grade I/II disease. With the exception of this association with tumor grade, in general, p53 isoform expression was not correlated with clinicopathologic parameters.
Discussion
Epithelial ovarian cancer still carries a high mortality rate and remains the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in the USA, despite decades of research. There are more than 22,280 new cases and 15,500 deaths expected in 2012 [101]. There has been no significant improvement in the 10-year survival rate of 20% for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients. The majority of deaths (~70%) in epithelial ovarian cancer occur in patients who are diagnosed with advanced-stage high-grade serous adenocarcinoma. A strength of the study by Hofstetter et al. is that it is restricted to advanced-stage (III/IV) serous adenocarcinoma; the most common and clinically relevant ovarian cancer subtype [1]. Furthermore, the tissue specimens in the Hofstetter study were accrued through a prospective multicenter project that sampled a wide range of patients and was accompanied by extensive follow-up information. These features of the study make the interpretation of the results more meaningful.
While mutations in the p53 gene are a feature of 50% of cancer cases overall, a systematic study by the Cancer Genome Atlas project found that almost all (96%) of serous ovarian cancer cases harbored a p53 mutation [2]. This highlights the importance of this tumor suppressor gene in ovarian carcinogenesis. However, in the current study [1], p53 mutational status did not show prognostic significance, which is not surprising considering the conflicting evidence in the literature and is in line with reports in several other cancers. This underscores the complexity of p53 pathway functionality. It is well established that p53 is a transcription factor that responds to stress and activates a cascade of gene expression that can lead to apoptosis or growth arrest. Regulation of p53 activity can occur post-translationally through protein–protein interactions. Indeed, it has been suggested that the p53 transcription factor is a multisubunit protein complex composed of different amounts of p53 and the related p63 and p73 protein isoforms, which assemble on the p53 response element of p53-inducible genes [3]. It is now known that 12 distinct isoforms of the p53 protein can be generated through alternative splicing, alternative initiation of translation and alternative promoter usage, and that at least some of these isoforms can physically interact with FLp53. Hence, p53 isoforms may regulate the activity of the full-length protein through protein–protein interactions.
In this context, it is significant that Hofstetter and colleagues show, for the first time, that two p53 isoforms that are N-terminally truncated (Δ133p53 and Δ40p53) have a favorable prognosis in subsets of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer and that the apparent protective effect of Δ133p53 occurs in tumors with mutant p53. The authors suggest that Δ133p53 may interact with mutant p53 as it oligomerizes with wild-type FLp53 and, since Δ133p53 lacks the transactivation domain, it may act as a dominant negative protein to suppress mutant p53’s oncogenic activity. However, it should be noted that Δ133p53 may also have activities that are independent of its association with FLp53, such as its ability to stimulate the expression of Bcl2 in response to stress [4]. The fact that several clinical studies showed that Δ133p53 was abnormally expressed in some tumors lends support to the notion that Δ133p53 plays a role in tumorigenesis, even though the clinical relevance of its expression in those tumors was not clear [5].
The authors also showed that high levels of Δ40p53 expression were significantly associated with improved recurrence-free survival; however, an explanation of these results is less obvious. All Δ40p53 isoforms contain transactivation domain II; hence, these proteins might be expected to have the capacity to activate gene expression, although it is uncertain whether Δ40p53 can induce the same cohort of genes as the wild-type FLp53 [6]. Since Δ40p53 forms a complex with wild-type FLp53, elevated levels of the isoform may stabilize the full-length protein and promote p53-mediated gene expression and its tumor suppressor activity [7].
Collectively, these studies suggest that elevated levels of some p53 isoforms may have favorable prognostic significance, which implies that the extent of function of the p53 pathway may be determined by the presence of one or more p53 isoforms. These results also highlight the complexity of the p53 pathway and point out that the p53 pathway may be controlled in unexpected ways that influence the pathways that are involved in tumorigenesis.
Future perspective
Identification of biomarkers that could inform a therapeutic strategy is an essential step in developing targeted personalized therapy. In the design of clinical trials that study therapeutic approaches targeting p53, the p53 status (mutation vs wild-type) is frequently used for triaging or classifying patients. In a recent review, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trials database listed 151 trials that exploit the p53 pathway [8]. However, as this paper by Hofstetter et al. demonstrates, the p53 network is complex and mutation status is probably not a sufficient determinant of p53 pathway activity [1]. In this respect, the studies by Hofstetter and colleagues are important because detecting the presence of p53 isoforms may be useful to more accurately stratify patients for clinical trials. These results also have therapeutic implications. Therapeutic approaches could be modified to take into account these new findings. For example, gene therapy approaches to restore wild-type p53 function could deliver a p53 isoform (instead of the wild-type p53 gene) to patients whose tumors harbor an inactivated p53. Activating wild-type p53 and/or inactivating mutant p53 by modulating these p53 isoform regulators are other potential approaches. It is important that a better understanding is gained of interactions within what is clearly a complex p53 network.
These results also have mechanistic implications. Loss of p53 is a common event during tumorigenesis, suggesting that inactivation of this tumor suppressor is a key event during tumorigenesis. However, regulation of the p53 pathway is complex and mutations in the p53 gene result in the expression of a mutant protein that has oncogenic activity. Hence, the notion that p53 mutations inactivate the p53 pathway is an oversimplification. More recently, the discovery of two other p53 family members, p63 and p73, and of at least a dozen truncated p53 isoforms that can interact with and modify the activity of the full-length protein, suggests that these isoforms play a key role in regulation of p53. Several studies have shown that Δ133p53 proteins are present at elevated levels in the cells of some tumor types, suggesting that they may play a role in tumorigenesis [9]. The results by Hofstetter and colleagues support this notion and suggest that the Δ133p53 and Δ40p53 isoforms may either substitute for the wild-type p53 protein or suppress the actions of mutant p53 and ameliorate the loss of p53 tumor suppressor activity. Hence, these two isoforms may have modest tumor suppressor activity in their own right. Further studies in other tumors and of other isoforms will be necessary to elucidate the full implications of p53 isoforms and their role in a malfunctioning p53 pathway in human tumors.
Executive summary.
Study design
A total of 154 patients with primary advanced serous ovarian cancer were enrolled in the study.
The mutational status of p53 in resected tumors was determined by sequencing and a yeast-based functional assay.
The levels of several p53 (Δ40p53, Δ133p53 and full-length p53) and p73 (TAp73 and ΔTAp73) isoforms were determined using real-time PCR.
Patients were followed for a median of 24.5 months (range: 1–49 months).
Results
Elevated expression of Δ133p53 correlated with improved recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with mutant p53.
Elevated expression of Δ40p53 was associated with improved recurrence-free survival in patients with wild-type p53.
There was no prognostic significance associated with the p73 isoforms.
Conclusion
This study suggests that elevated expression of some p53 isoforms can indicate a favorable prognosis; however, this is determined by the context (p53 mutational status) in which these isoforms are expressed.
These results suggest that p53 isoforms may be useful prognostic markers and have mechanistic implications for regulation of the p53 pathway.
Footnotes
For reprint orders, please contact: reprints@futuremedicine.com
Financial & competing interests disclosure
Funding in support of this manuscript was provided by the National Cancer Institute, RO1 CA129688 and P30 CA023074. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
- 1.Hofstetter G, Berger A, Schuster E, et al. Δ133p53 is an independent prognostic marker in p53 mutant advanced serous ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(10):1593–1599. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474(7353):609–615. doi: 10.1038/nature10166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murray-Zmijewski F, Lane DP, Bourdon JC. p53/p63/p73 isoforms: an orchestra of isoforms to harmonise cell differentiation and response to stress. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(6):962–972. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aoubala M, Murray-Zmijewski F, Khoury MP, et al. p53 directly transactivates Δ133p53alpha, regulating cell fate outcome in response to DNA damage. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18(2):248–258. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Song W, Huo SW, Lü JJ, et al. Expression of p53 isoforms in renal cell carcinoma. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009;122(8):921–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu J, Zhou W, Jiang J, Chen X. Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for mediating apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(21):13030–13036. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.21.13030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ghosh A, Stewart D, Matlashewski G. Regulation of human p53 activity and cell localization by alternative splicing. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(18):7987–7997. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.7987-7997.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheok CF, Verma CS, Baselga J, Lane DP. Translating p53 into the clinic. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(1):25–37. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bourdon JC, Fernandes K, Murray-Zmijewski F, et al. p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity. Genes Dev. 2005;19(18):2122–2137. doi: 10.1101/gad.1339905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Website
- 101.American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-031941.pdf.
