Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2015 Sep 11;94(36):e1470. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001470

Osteochondritis Dissecans Involving the Trochlear Groove Treated With Retrograde Drilling

A Case Report

Yoshio Kaji 1, Osamu Nakamura 1, Konosuke Yamaguchi 1, Tetsuji Yamamoto 1
Editor: Mayr Johannes1
PMCID: PMC4616633  PMID: 26356703

Abstract

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) occurs frequently in the humeral capitellum of the upper extremity, whereas OCD involving the trochlear groove (trochlear groove OCD) is rarely reported. A standard treatment for trochlear groove OCD has therefore not been determined, although several methods have been tried.

The case of a 14-year-old male gymnast with bilateral trochlear groove OCD is presented. Retrograde drilling from the lateral condyle of the humerus was applied for the OCD lesion of the left elbow, since it was larger in size than that in the right elbow and was symptomatic. Conversely, since the right lesion was small and asymptomatic, it was managed conservatively.

After treatment, consolidation of the OCD lesions was observed in both elbows. However, the time to healing was shorter in the left elbow treated surgically than in the right elbow managed conservatively.

In conclusion, retrograde drilling is a very simple and minimally invasive treatment. This case suggests that retrograde drilling for trochlear groove OCD may be a useful procedure that may accelerate the healing process for OCD lesions.

INTRODUCTION

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) occurs frequently in the humeral capitellum in the upper extremity, whereas only a few cases of OCD involving the trochlear groove (trochlear groove OCD) have been reported.16

A patient with bilateral trochlear groove OCD who underwent retrograde drilling for one elbow and conservative treatment for the other elbow is reported. This case provides an opportunity to compare the efficacy of retrograde drilling with the efficacy of conservative treatment for trochlear groove OCD.

CASE REPORT

A 14-year-old male gymnast presented for evaluation of left elbow pain for a duration of about 1 month. There was no history of trauma to the region. He had been involved in artistic gymnastics for 11 years.

Physical examination revealed mild motion pain of the left elbow, while his right elbow was asymptomatic. Ranges of motions of both elbows were normal, and both elbows had no tenderness, swelling, or joint instability.

Roentgenograms of both elbows revealed radiolucent lesions with condensed borders in the trochlear groove (Figures 1A and 2A). The size of the radiolucent lesion of the left elbow was bigger than that of the right elbow. Computed tomography demonstrated a concave defect in the trochlear groove (Figures 1B and 2B). In the left elbow, a small osseous fragment was observed in the defect (Figure 1B). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed subchondral defects involving the central aspect of the trochlea in both elbows. Joint fluid invasion into the defects was also observed. However, the joint cartilage layer was preserved (Figures 1C and 2C).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph of the left elbow with a radiolucent lesion in the trochlear groove. (B) Computed tomography scan of the left elbow showing a concave defect with a small osseous fragment. (C) Magnetic resonance image of the left elbow showing the defect in the trochlear groove. Continuity of articular cartilage is preserved.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(A) Preoperative anteroposterior radiograph of the right elbow, (B) computed tomography scan, and (C) magnetic resonance image of the right elbow. Almost the same findings as those of the left elbow are seen. However, the size of the defect is smaller than that in the left elbow.

For the symptomatic left elbow, retrograde drilling into the radiolucent lesion from the lateral condyle of the humerus was performed. At the time of drilling, the lateral condyle was exposed via a small longitudinal skin incision, and under an image intensifier, a 1.8-mm pilot Kirschner wire was advanced to the center of the OCD lesion. Correct aiming was verified in anteroposterior and lateral views of the image intensifier. This wire was then used as a guide for subsequent drilling. Additional drilling was performed using another 1.8-mm Kirschner wire. Drilling was performed about 5 times for both lateral and medial aspects of the subchondral sclerotic zones, and penetration of the sclerotic zone was evaluated by the loss of resistance technique (Figure 3A).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(A) Fluoroscopy-guided retrograde drilling from the lateral condyle of the humerus. (B) Anteroposterior radiograph of the left elbow at 3 months after surgery. Evidence of consolidation of the trochlear lesion is observed.

After the surgery, the left elbow was immobilized with a long arm plaster splint at 70° of elbow flexion for 3 weeks. After removal of the splint, active assistive range of motion exercises for the elbow joint combined with thermotherapy were administered by a therapist twice a week, and daily active range of motion exercises were also performed by the patient himself. The exercises were performed once a day. Within 3 weeks, full range of motion of the left elbow was obtained, and the exercises were stopped. The size of the radiolucent area was gradually reduced after the surgery, and evidence of consolidation of the trochlear lesion was observed 3 months after surgery (Figure 3B).

For the right elbow, conservative management by prohibiting heavy use of the right elbow was undertaken because the size of the radiolucent lesion was smaller than that of the left elbow, and the lesion was asymptomatic. The size of this lesion also gradually decreased after the initiation of conservative treatment, and the lesion disappeared within 5 months (Figure 4). However, the duration of healing was longer compared with the left elbow that had surgery.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Anteroposterior radiograph of the right elbow 5 months after surgery. Evidence of consolidation of the trochlear lesion is observed.

At the 2-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic.

Informed consent was obtained from the patient and his parents for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

DISCUSSION

OCD is a subchondral bone lesion resulting in separation of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone, and it is well known that OCD commonly affects the knee, ankle, and elbow joints. In the elbow joint, OCD primarily involves the capitellum of the humerus, and it is common with activities such as baseball or gymnastics.710 In these activities, repeated valgus stress is believed to cause microtrauma to the capitellum.8,10 On the other hand, trochlear groove OCD has rarely been reported. There are several reports of trochlear groove OCD in the elbows of athletes such as gymnasts, tennis players, baseball pitchers, and basketball players.3,5,6 However, the mechanism that causes the trochlear groove OCD is still unclear, because the number of clinical reports of this disease is insufficient to clarify the mechanism. However, Marshall et al3 hypothesized that trochlear groove (lateral trochlea) OCD lesions occur in a characteristic vascular watershed zone resulting from the unique blood supply of the trochlea.

Treatment of trochlear groove OCD is guided by the clinical and radiographic findings, but there is no standard treatment, and several kinds of treatments have been suggested. Patel and Weiner4 reported a case of trochlear groove OCD treated conservatively, and 2 years later the patient showed some radiographic evidence of consolidation of the lesion. They also reported a case that was treated with curettage of the trochlear groove OCD lesion.4 In that report, the patient regained full range of motion of the elbow and was asymptomatic for 3 years, but they did not show whether consolidation of the lesion was obtained.

Iwasaki et al2 reported an adult case of trochlear groove OCD that was treated with transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage. In this case, the OCD lesion was covered with cartilage-like tissue 12 months after surgery. This method is expected to be a useful option for treatment, especially for adult cases whose bone remodeling potential has already decreased. However, to apply this method, osteotomy of the olecranon is required to approach the OCD lesion, and the very complicated technique of cell culture is also required.

Horiuchi et al1 reported a case of bilateral trochlear groove OCD in the Japanese literature that underwent retrograde drilling from the lateral humeral condyle, and consolidation of the OCD lesions was observed after surgery in this patient.

Antegrade drilling (transarticular drilling) is another option for trochlear groove OCD treatment, but there is no report of antegrade drilling for trochlear groove OCD.

Antegrade drilling is a common treatment option for OCD lesions, and the aim of the drilling is decompression to allow for revascularization of the defect. There are many reports of antegrade drilling for the treatment of OCD in the humeral capitellum and knee.1113 In most of these reports, the drilling is performed in a minimally invasive manner using arthroscopy. However, antegrade drilling cannot avoid articular surface violation, and it is difficult to visualize and drill a deeply placed OCD lesion. On the other hand, there are several reports in which retrograde drilling was used for OCD lesions of the knee and ankle, 1417 and recent studies demonstrated favorable results for retrograde drilling of stable OCD lesions.1820 Kono et al21 also reported that the clinical results of retrograde drilling for OCD of the talar dome were superior to those of antegrade transmalleolar drilling. The advantages of retrograde drilling are that it avoids articular surface violation,22 and it can be combined with retrograde autologous cancellous bone-grafting if it is needed.23 Furthermore, to perform antegrade drilling, curettage, or transplantation of cartilage for OCD lesions of the talus and trochlea, osteotomies of overlying bone, such as the medial malleolus or olecranon, are sometimes needed to approach the lesions.10,24,25 For OCD lesion of these sites, retrograde drilling is a useful treatment option.

In many reports of ante- and retrograde drilling, a 1.5- to 2.0-mm Kirschner wire is usually used for drilling of the OCD lesion.1,11,13,19,20,2628 In accordance with these reports, a 1.8-mm Kirschner wire was used for drilling the OCD lesion in the present case. However, if the patients are younger or the size of the OCD lesions is smaller, a thinner wire may be used.

In the reports of knee and ankle OCD lesions, the authors have used retrograde drilling for stable OCD lesions.13,1720 We think that, for the treatment of elbow OCD lesions, it is also appropriate to use this technique for stable OCD lesions. The treatment will fail if we use this technique for unstable OCD lesions in which the osteochondral fragments have already floated. In addition, the most important advantage of retrograde drilling is that we can avoid articular surface violation. Thus, we should be very careful not to drill the articular surface. To avoid articular surface violation, it is very important to visualize the OCD lesion clearly.

In the present case, an image intensifier was used to visualize the OCD lesion and the tip of the Kirschner wire. In the reports of OCD lesions of the talus, open MRI scanners and navigation systems tend to be used for the retrograde drilling.14,15,18,22,29 However, for drilling the OCD lesion of the femoral condyle, an image intensifier is often used even now.20,3032 The reason for this is that it is thought that a clear lateral view of the femoral condyle is more easily obtained compared to the talus, because the femoral condyle is not surrounded by other bones, unlike the talus. The humeral trochlea is also not surrounded by other bones like the femoral condyle. Horiuchi et al1 used an image intensifier for retrograde drilling of trochlear groove OCD, and they could visualize the OCD lesion. In the present case, it was possible to visualize the OCD lesion and the tip of the Kirschner wire using the image intensifier.

Retrograde drilling was tried for the present trochlear groove OCD patient, and a good result was obtained. Although consolidation of the OCD lesion was also observed in the contralateral elbow (right elbow) that was treated conservatively, in the OCD lesion of the left elbow, which was bigger in size than the lesion of the right elbow, the period for obtaining consolidation was shorter with retrograde drilling (3 months) than in the right elbow (5 months). This fact suggests that there is a possibility that the retrograde drilling accelerated the healing process of the OCD lesion.

There are several limitations to this report. Since this was a single case report, more cases need to be treated before one can assert that retrograde drilling accelerates the healing process of trochlear groove OCD. In addition, a long-arm plaster splint was used after the surgery because of concern that fragility of the bone around the OCD lesion was caused by drilling. Therefore, one cannot exclude the effect of the plaster splint for the healing process, and one cannot claim that this was a simple comparison of retrograde drilling and conservative treatment; in the strict sense, this was a comparison of retrograde drilling plus a long-arm plaster splint and conservative treatment. However, the duration of using the plaster splint was only 3 weeks, and at the time of removal of the splint, the size of the OCD lesion had not changed. Thus, the effect of the splint on healing of the OCD lesion was thought to be minimal.

In conclusion, this case provided an opportunity to compare retrograde drilling and conservative treatment of trochlear groove OCD. Retrograde drilling is a very simple and minimally invasive treatment, and it may accelerate the healing process. Thus, retrograde drilling may be considered one of the first choices of treatment for trochlear groove OCD.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, OCD = osteochondritis dissecans, trochlear groove OCD = OCD involving the trochlear groove.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Horiuchi T, Omokawa S, Fujitani S, et al. Bilateral osteochondritis dissecans involving the trochlea of the humerus: a case report. J Jpn Elbow Soc 2010; 17:101–104.(Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Iwasaki M, Yamane S, Ishikawa J, et al. Osteochondritis dissecans involving the trochlea of the humerus treated with transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17:e22–e25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marshall KW, Marshall DL, Busch MT, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the humeral trochlea in the young athlete. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38:479–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel N, Weiner SD. Osteochondritis dissecans involving the trochlea: report of two patients (three elbows) and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop 2002; 22:48–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pruthi S, Parnell SE, Thapa MM. Pseudointercondylar notch sign: manifestation of osteochondritis dissecans of the trochlea. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39:180–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vanthournout I, Rudelli A, Valenti P, et al. Osteochondritis dissecans of the trochlea of the humerus. Pediatr Radiol 1991; 21:600–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic surgery for isolated capitellar osteochondritis dissecans in adolescent baseball players: minimum three-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30:474–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jackson DW, Silvino N, Reiman P. Osteochondritis in the female gymnast's elbow. Arthroscopy 1989; 5:129–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ovesen J, Olsen BS, Johannsen HV. The clinical outcomes of mosaicplasty in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the distal humeral capitellum of young athletes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20:813–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tivnon MC, Anzel SH, Waugh TR. Surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum. Am J Sports Med 1976; 4:121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arai Y, Hara K, Fujiwara H, et al. A new arthroscopic-assisted drilling method through the radius in a distal-to-proximal direction for osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow. Arthroscopy 2008; 24:237.e1–237 e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cepero S, Ullot R, Sastre S. Osteochondritis of the femoral condyles in children and adolescents: our experience over the last 28 years. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005; 14:24–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Louisia S, Beaufils P, Katabi M, et al. Transchondral drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the medial condyle of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11:33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bale RJ, Hoser C, Rosenberger R, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: computer-assisted retrograde drilling-feasibility and accuracy in initial experiences. Radiology 2001; 218:278–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoffmann M, Petersen JP, Schröder M, et al. Retrograde drilling of talar osteochondritis dissecans lesions: a feasibility and accuracy analysis of a novel electromagnetic navigation method versus a standard fluoroscopic method. Arthroscopy 2012; 28:1547–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoffmann M, Schröder M, Petersen JP, et al. Arthroscopically assisted retrograde drilling for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20:2257–2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ojala R, Kerimaa P, Lakovaara M, et al. MRI-guided percutaneous retrograde drilling of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40:765–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kerimaa P, Ojala R, Sinikumpu J, et al. MRI-guided percutaneous retrograde drilling of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:1572–1576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Corominas L, Sanpera I, Masrouha K, et al. Retrograde percutaneous drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the head of the talus: case report and review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014; S1067–S2516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pennock AT, Bomar JD, Chambers HG. Extra-articular, intraepiphyseal drilling for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Arthrosc Tech 2013; 2:e231–e235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kono M, Takao M, Naito K, et al. Retrograde drilling for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34:1450–1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gras F, Marintschev I, Müller M, et al. Arthroscopic-controlled navigation for retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 2010; 31:897–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anders S, Lechler P, Rackl W, et al. Fluoroscopy-guided retrograde core drilling and cancellous bone grafting in osteochondral defects of the talus. Int Orthop 2012; 36:1635–1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gautier E, Kolker D, Jakob RP. Treatment of cartilage defects of the talus by autologous osteochondral grafts. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002; 84-B:237–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Navid DO, Myerson MS. Approach alternatives for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Clin 2002; 7:635–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hayan T, Phillipe G, Ludovic S, et al. Juvenile osteochondritis of femoral condyles: treatment with transchondral drilling. Analysis of 40 cases. J Child Orthop 2010; 4:39–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yonetani Y, Tanaka Y, Shiozaki Y, et al. Transarticular drilling for stable juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the medial femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20:1528–1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gunton MJ, Carey JL, Shaw CR, et al. Drilling juvenile osteochondritis dissecans: retro- or transarticular? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471:1144–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seebauer CJ, Bail HJ, Wichlas F, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: retrograde drilling with high-field-strength MR guidance. Radiology 2009; 252:857–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boughanem J, Riaz R, Patal RM, et al. Functional and radiographic outcome of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the knee treated with extra-articular retrograde drilling. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39:2212–2217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Donaldson LD, Wojtys EM. Extraarticular drilling for stable osteochondritis dissecans in the skeletally immature knee. J Pediatr Orthop 2008; 28:831–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wall EJ, Heyworth BE, Shea KG, et al. Trochlear groove osteochondritis dissecans of the knee patellofemoral joint. J Pediatr Orthop 2014; 34:625–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES