Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 Aug 19;11(12):1829–1832. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.941355

Coacervate delivery systems for proteins and small molecule drugs

Noah R Johnson 1,2, Yadong Wang 1,2,3,4,5
PMCID: PMC4617778  NIHMSID: NIHMS723004  PMID: 25138695

Abstract

Coacervates represent an exciting new class of drug delivery vehicles, developed in the past decade as carriers of small molecule drugs and proteins. This review summarizes several well-described coacervate systems, including

  1. Elastin-like peptides for delivery of anti-cancer therapeutics,

  2. Heparin-based coacervates with synthetic polycations for controlled growth factor delivery,

  3. Carboxymethyl chitosan aggregates for oral drug delivery,

  4. Mussel adhesive protein and hyaluronic acid coacervates.

Coacervates present advantages in their simple assembly and easy incorporation into tissue engineering scaffolds or as adjuncts to cell therapies. They are also amenable to functionalization such as for targeting or for enhancing the bioactivity of their cargo. These new drug carriers are anticipated to have broad applications and noteworthy impact in the near future.

Keywords: chitosan, coacervate, controlled release, doxorubicin, drug delivery, elastin, growth factor, heparin, hyaluronic acid

I. Introduction

A coacervate is a liquid-liquid separation held together and apart from their surrounding liquid by hydrophobic forces. Coacervates exist as spherical droplets, often on the nanometer or micron scale in diameter, resembling an emulsion except that they do not necessarily contain stabilizing molecules such as surfactants. Coacervates have been investigated since the mid-20th century mostly within the context of food science research [1]. With the advafncement in drug delivery, the use of coacervates as controlled delivery vehicles has started only recently. One particularly attractive feature of coacervates for drug delivery is their high loading capacity and the fact that they form by self-assembly in an aqueous medium [2]. Once encapsulated within the coacervate phase, labile proteins or drugs are separated and protected from the surrounding environment, thereby preserving their bioactivity. Compared to other common vehicles such as hydrogels and microparticles, coacervates form quickly and do not require organic solvents which could reduce protein drug retention and bioactivity. Finally, their size often enables coacervates to be applied via fine gauge needles, important for minimizing damage associated with injection.

Several themes have become apparent among coacervates developed for drug delivery. One major theme is the incorporation of native extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as heparin, elastin, hyaluronic acid, and chondroitin sulfate. These approaches strategically employ the body’s own charged molecules as one or both components of the coacervate. Secondly is the slow and sustained manner of release of loaded cargos, avoiding burst release experienced with many other types of delivery systems. Thirdly, is their existence in dynamic equilibrium with their environment, highly susceptible to disaggregation in response to changes in ionic concentration or temperature of their environment. The consequences of these characteristics are thankfully very well understood and can be anticipated and even exploited to engineer coacervate drug carriers with precise design requirements.

The purpose of this review is to exhibit several coacervate systems which have been developed for the delivery of small molecule drugs and proteins. Despite their apparent similarity with coacervates, nanogels [3], charge-based polyplexes for nucleic acid delivery [4], and lipid-based emulsion delivery systems [5] are thoroughly reviewed elsewhere and will therefore not be considered here.

2. Current Coacervate Delivery Systems

2.1 Elastin-like peptides

Elastin-like peptides (ELPs) were developed in the late 20th century [6], then further explored as drug delivery vehicles more recently [7]. ELPs are recombinant proteins designed to mimic the hydrophobic regions of tropoelastin. They consist of simple pentapeptide repeats, most commonly VPGXG, where X represents any amino acid except proline, termed the “guest residue”. ELPs exhibit an inverse temperature phase transition, aggregating to form a coacervate above their transition temperature (Tt) which is tunable based on the guest residue and ELP chain length [8].

Drug delivery using ELPs has been focused on targeting and abolition of solid tumors [9]. One approach is local injection of ELPs with a Tt between room and body temperature, enabling in situ coacervation to form drug depots which slowly release their cargo. After intratumoral injection of radionuclide-conjugated ELPs, tumor regression was observed in more than two-thirds of the mice treated and the therapeutic effects lasted for at least 2 months [10]. A second approach is systemic injection of ELPs with a Tt between body temperature and 42 °C in combination with mild hyperthermia at the target tumor site. Local heating of the tumor, achieved clinically by methods such as ultrasound, increases extravasation of the ELPs and induces in situ coacervation. This method resulted in two-fold higher accumulation of doxorubicin-conjugated ELPs at the tumor site compared to non-heated tumors and even greater accumulation if multiple thermal cycles were applied [11,12]. ELP coacervate has also demonstrated usefulness in tissue engineering applications as a viscous medium for delivery and differentiation of chondrocytes or progenitor cells [13,14].

2.2 Heparin:polycation coacervate

Another coacervate delivery system utilizes heparin to first bind one or more heparin-binding proteins, including numerous growth factors, cytokines, and morphogens [15]. A synthetic polycation containing arginine [16] or lysine [17] as the positive charge-bearer is then introduced to interact with the highly-sulfated heparin by polyvalent charge attraction. A complex coacervate instantly forms with droplet sizes range from 0.1–10 μm in diameter, dependent on the loaded protein and the ionic environment. The strong, specific interaction between heparin and heparin-binding proteins results in very high loading efficiency of this coacervate, often greater than 99%. The release rate is influenced by multiple factors, including the heparin-binding affinity of the protein of interest, the net charge of the coacervate, and the polycation molecular weight, charge density, and biodegradation rate [18,19].

One significant advantage of this coacervate system is owed to pre-conjugation of the growth factors to heparin which potentiates their bioactivities by mimicking the way that ECM proteoglycans present these factors to cell receptors [18,19]. In one instance, a single injection of heparin-based coacervate delivering fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) induced stable angiogenesis subcutaneously [20]; a similar benefit was observed after injection into the infarcted myocardium which resulted in improved cardiac function [21]. A second formulation for cardiac repair contained sonic hedgehog, establishing the versatility of the heparin:polycation coacervate to deliver morphogens [22]. In another study, skin wound healing was accelerated after a single application of the heparin:polycation coacervate containing heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) into the wound [23]. This coacervate system also proved useful in combination with adult stem cells, slowly releasing bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) to stimulate their osteogenic differentiation and ectopic bone formation [24]. Another advantage of this controlled release system is its simple incorporation into tissue engineering scaffolds by adsorption. This technique was recently employed to recruit progenitor cells into a porous polymer graft by slowly releasing the stem cell trafficking chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1 α) [25].

2.3 Carboxymethyl chitosan-based coacervates

Carboxymethylation increases the water solubility of chitosan and the resulting carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) has become a commonly studied polymer with a variety of applications, including drug delivery. The polyanionic nature of CMC enables its coacervation with positively-charged molecules via electrostatic interactions. This method was employed using unmodified chitosan as the polycation to deliver doxorubicin in an oral formulation that slowly released it within the GI tract, significantly increasing its intestinal absorption and bioavailability in the blood [26]. The group went on to encapsulate the coacervate beads within sodium alginate shells for further stabilization and protection in the low pH gastric environment [27].

2.4 Mussel adhesive proteins

Another common coacervate system exploits the unique properties of charged proteins secreted by marine organisms such as tubeworms and mussels. These polyelectrolyte proteins undergo complex coacervation to produce a robust underwater adhesive which facilitates anchoring to a surface or cementing together sand and shell fragments. Recombinant mimics of these mussel adhesive proteins (MAPs) have been characterized and evaluated for numerous applications [28]. Of particular importance for drug delivery, coacervation of recombinant hybrid MAPs with hyaluronic acid (HA) creates micron-sized droplets that are stable for at least 8 days in phosphate-buffered saline [29]. Recombinant MAPs also retain their adhesive qualities after coacervation with HA, allowing their use as a device coating or easy integration into tissue engineered scaffolds [30]. Although these systems have yet to be used in a drug delivery setting, these explorations are anticipated in the near future.

3. Expert opinion

Compared with other drug delivery vehicles including micro- and nano-particles, liposomes, hydrogels and dendrimers, coacervate is a very recent development, with just over a decade of history. Despite the short history, coacervate delivery vehicle as a class has already shown that: (1) it forms rapidly in water by self-assembly, (2) it can substantially improve the bioactivity of proteins in vitro and in vivo, (3) it readily coats a biomaterial surface either alone or combined with other molecules, (4) it can increase the efficacy of cell therapy, and (5) targeting is feasible. Self-assembly in water and affinity to proteins that significantly reduce protein denaturation and burst release make coacervate a rational choice for controlled release of proteins and peptides. Ionic coacervates can be less stable compared with conventional drug delivery vehicles in biological fluids because of their ionic nature, and this needs to be addressed for a systemic delivery route when the coacervate will be carried by blood. To this end, much can be borrowed from strategies for stabilization of liposomes. Furthermore, active targeting of a specific tissue or pathology (e.g. cancer, infarction, or inflammation) will greatly expand the utility of this new class of drug delivery vehicles. Other future growth areas are “control” over release kinetics including stimulus-responsive release and external guidance of the coacervate post-injection. In all, we anticipate that coacervate will evolve into a versatile tool for controlled drug delivery in the near future and a likely catalyst for the “big bang” of this field will be a successful clinical translation of any coacervate vehicle.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

References

  • 1.Overbeek JTG, Voorn MJ. Phase separation in polyelectrolyte solutions. Theory of complex coacervation. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1957;49(S1):7–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Kruif CG, Weinbreck F, De Vries R. Complex coacervation of proteins and anionic polysaccharides. Curr Opin Colloid In. 2004;9(5):340–349. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu G, An Z. Frontiers in the design and synthesis of advanced nanogels for nanomedicine. Polym Chem. 2014;5(5):1559–1565. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pack DW, Hoffman AS, Pun S, Stayton PS. Design and development of polymers for gene delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(7):581–593. doi: 10.1038/nrd1775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McClements DJ, Li Y. Structured emulsion-based delivery systems: Controlling the digestion and release of lipophilic food components. Adv Colloid Interfac. 2010;159(2):213–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Urry DW. Physical chemistry of biological free energy transduction as demonstrated by elastic protein-based polymers. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101(51):11007–11028. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.MacEwan SR, Chilkoti A. Elastin-like polypeptides: Biomedical applications of tunable biopolymers. Biopolymers. 2010;94(1):60–77. doi: 10.1002/bip.21327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Urry DW, Luan CH, Parker TM, Gowda DC, Prasad KU, Reid MC, Safavy A. Temperature of polypeptide inverse temperature transition depends on mean residue hydrophobicity. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113(11):4346–4348. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McDaniel JR, Callahan DJ, Chilkoti A. Drug delivery to solid tumors by elastin-like polypeptides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(15):1456–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10**.Liu WG, McDaniel J, Li XH, Asai D, Quiroz FG, Schaal J, Park JS, Zalutsky M, Chilkoti A. Brachytherapy using injectable seeds that are self-assembled from genetically encoded polypeptides in situ. Cancer Res. 2012;72(22):5956–5965. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2127. Exceptional in vivo results lasting for at least 2 months. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meyer DE, Kong GA, Dewhirst MW, Zalutsky MR, Chilkoti A. Targeting a genetically engineered elastin-like polypeptide to solid tumors by local hyperthermia. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1548–1554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dreher MR, Liu W, Michelich CR, Dewhirst MW, Chilkoti A. Thermal cycling enhances the accumulation of a temperature-sensitive biopolymer in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2007;67(9):4418–4424. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13*.Betre H, Ong SR, Guilak F, Chilkoti A, Fermor B, Setton LA. Chondrocytic differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells in elastin-like polypeptide. Biomaterials. 2006;27(1):91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.071. Large coacervate structures which can encapsulate, protect, and deliver stem cells. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Betre H, Setton LA, Meyer DE, Chilkoti A. Characterization of a genetically engineered elastin-like polypeptide for cartilaginous tissue repair. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3(5):910–916. doi: 10.1021/bm0255037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ori A, Wilkinson MC, Fernig DG. A systems biology approach for the investigation of the heparin/heparan sulfate interactome. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(22):19892–19904. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.228114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chu H, Gao J, Wang Y. Design, synthesis, and biocompatibility of an arginine-based polyester. Biotechnol Prog. 2012;28(1):257–264. doi: 10.1002/btpr.728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Johnson NR, Ambe T, Wang Y. Lysine-based polycation:Heparin coacervate for controlled protein delivery. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chu H, Johnson NR, Mason NS, Wang Y. A [polycation:Heparin] complex releases growth factors with enhanced bioactivity. J Control Release. 2011;150(2):157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zern BJ, Chu HH, Osunkoya AO, Gao J, Wang YD. A biocompatible arginine-based polycation. Adv Func Mater. 2011;21(3):434–440. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201000969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chu H, Gao J, Chen CW, Huard J, Wang Y. Injectable fibroblast growth factor-2 coacervate for persistent angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(33):13444–13449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110121108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chu H, Chen CW, Huard J, Wang Y. The effect of a heparin-based coacervate of fibroblast growth factor-2 on scarring in the infarcted myocardium. Biomaterials. 2013;34(6):1747–1756. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Johnson NR, Wang Y. Controlled delivery of sonic hedgehog morphogen and its potential for cardiac repair. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Johnson NR, Wang Y. Controlled delivery of heparin-binding egf-like growth factor yields fast and comprehensive wound healing. J Control Release. 2013;166(2):124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24*.Li H, Johnson NR, Usas A, Lu A, Poddar M, Wang Y, Huard J. Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein 2 via coacervate improves the osteogenic potential of muscle-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2(9):667–677. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0027. Coacervate system which can compliment stem cell therapy. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee KW, Johnson NR, Gao J, Wang Y. Human progenitor cell recruitment via sdf-1alpha coacervate-laden pgs vascular grafts. Biomaterials. 2013;34(38):9877–9885. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Feng C, Wang Z, Jiang C, Kong M, Zhou X, Li Y, Cheng X, Chen X. Chitosan/o-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles for efficient and safe oral anticancer drug delivery: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2013;457(1):158–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.07.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27*.Feng C, Song R, Sun G, Kong M, Bao Z, Li Y, Cheng X, Cha D, Park H, Chen X. Immobilization of coacervate microcapsules in multilayer sodium alginate beads for efficient oral anticancer drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(3):985–996. doi: 10.1021/bm401890x. Highly efficient enteric drug delivery system providing protection of cargo at low pH. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee BP, Messersmith PB, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2011:41, 99–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29*.Lim S, Choi YS, Kang DG, Song YH, Cha HJ. The adhesive properties of coacervated recombinant hybrid mussel adhesive proteins. Biomaterials. 2010;31(13):3715–3722. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.063. Fascinating use of biomimicry. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hwang DS, Waite JH, Tirrell M. Promotion of osteoblast proliferation on complex coacervation-based hyaluronic acid - recombinant mussel adhesive protein coatings on titanium. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1080–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES