Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem. 2011 Dec;0 1:Unit–1.2516. doi: 10.1002/0471142700.nc0125s47

Synthesis of the Tellurium-Derivatized Phosphoramidites and their Incorporation into DNA Oligonucleotides

Sibo Jiang 1, Jia Sheng 1, Zhen Huang 1,
PMCID: PMC4618196  NIHMSID: NIHMS341716  PMID: 22147418

Introduction

In this unit, an efficient method for the synthesis of 2’-tellerium modified phosphoramidite and its incorporation into oligonucleotide are presented. We choose 5’-O-DMTr-2,2’-anhydro-uridine and -thymidine nucleosides (S.1, S.2) as starting materials due to their easy preparation. The 5’-O-DMTr-2,2’-anhydro-uridine and -thymidine can be converted to corresponding the 2’-tellerium-derivatized nucleosides by treating with the telluride nucleophiles. Subsequently, the 2’-Te-nucleosides can be transformed into 3’-phosphoramidites, which are the building blocks for DNA/RNA synthesis. The DNA synthesis, purification and applications of oligonucleotides containing 2’-Te-U or 2’-Te-T are described in this protocol.

Keywords: tellurium nucleic acid, nucleic acid modification, Te-derivatizatized DNA, nucleic acid X-ray crystallography, DNA damaging, conductive DNA, DNA imaging


This protocol is based on the previously published work (Sheng, et al. 2009), and it contains the detailed procedures for the synthesis of 2’-tellerium-modified uridine (2’-Te-U) and thymidine (2’-Te-T) phosphoramidites. They and oligonucleotides containing 2’-Te-U or 2’-Te-T are illustrated in Figure 1. Basic Protocol 1 describes the synthesis of 2’-phenyltelluride-modified U and T phosphoramidites. Basic Protocol 2 describes the synthesis of 2’-methyltelleride-modified U and T phosphoramidites. The products from Basic Protocol 1 or Basic Protocol 2 can be applied to solid-phase DNA synthesis. In Basic Protocol 3, synthesis and purification of oligonucleotide containing 2’-Te-T or 2’-Te-U are further explained. The starting material 5’-O-DMTr-2,2’-anhydro-U and -T (S.1, S.2) can be prepared from commercially available uridine and ribothymidine, respectively, by two steps synthesis with high yields (Carrasco, et al. 2004 and Sheng, et al. 2007). The organotellerium reagent (dimethylditelluride or diphenylditelluride) is reduced first, and then the tellurium functionality is introduced to 2’-alpha position by a SN2 reaction (phenyltelluride as nucleophile in Basic Protocol 1, methyltelluride as nucleophile in Basic Protocol 2, respectively). The resulted key intermediates (S.3a, S.4a, S.3b, and S.4b) are converted to corresponding phosphoramidtes (S.5a, S.6a, S.5b, and S.6b) by standard procedures. The Te-phosphoramidite monomer is then incorporated into oligonucleotides by solid-phase synthesis, followed by deprotection, purification and analysis. (Basic Protocol 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

General scheme of synthesizing 2’-TePh-T, 2’-TePh-U, 2’-TeMe-T and 2’-TeMe-U phosphoramidites from 5’-O-DMTr-2,2’-anhydro-T and 5’-O-DMTr-2,2’-anhydro-U (Basic Protocol 1 and Basic Protocol 2).

BASIC PROTOCOL 1 PREPARATION OF THE 2’-PHENYLTELLANYL PHOSPHORAMIDITE

The introduction of the phenyl-telluride functionality to nucleoside is conducted by attack of phenyltelluride nucleophile at the alpha-face of 2, 2’-anhydro-uridine or -thymidine nucleoside. Instead of using elemental tellurium, diphenylditelluride is used as a source of tellurium to avoid rapid oxidation of tellurol. Phenyltelluride nucleophile is generated by reduction of the organotellerium reagent with NaBH4 in THF. The starting material, 5’-DMTr-2, 2’-anhydrouridine S.1 or 5’-DMTr-2, 2’-anhydrothymidine S.2, can be easily prepared by following the literatures or purchased commercially, respectively. The resulting 2’-PhTe nucleosides can be converted to corresponding phosphoramidites by treating with 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropyl-chlorophosphoramidite in the presence of Hünig’s base (N,N-diisopropylethylamine).

Materials

  • Dry argon (Ar)

  • 5’-DMTr-2, 2’-anhydrouridine S.1 (SeNA Research)

  • 5’-DMTr-2, 2’-anhydrothymidine S.2 (SeNA Research)

  • Diphenylditelluride (PhTeTePh) (TCI America)

  • NaBH4 (sodium borohydride) (Sigma)

  • Anhydrous THF (tetrahydrofuran)

  • Anhydrous EtOH (ethanol)

  • Anhydrous DCM (methylene chloride)

  • Anhydrous Na2SO4

  • N, N-diisopropylethylamine (Chemgene)

  • 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropyl-chlorophosphoramidite (Chemgene)

  • Ethyl acetate

  • Hexane

  • Silica gel 60 (230 – 400 mesh)

  • Al2O3

  • Saturated NaHCO3 aqueous solution

  • Vacuum pump

  • 250 mL separatory funnel

  • 250-, 100-, 50-, 25-, 5-mL round bottom flasks

  • 1, 3, 5 and 10 mL disposable syringes

Introduction of Phenyltelluride Functionality

All reactions are performed in Ar atmosphere. An Ar atmosphere can be carried out through a rubber septum that seals the flask and connects to balloon filled with Ar. A slightly positive pressure is maintained in the system to provide dry and oxygen-free atmosphere. Liquid chemical is added using syringe through rubber septum.

  • 1

    Weigh sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 6.2 mg, 0.15 mmol), place it in an oven-dried 25 mL round-bottom flask containing an 8 x 1.5 mm magnetic stir bar. Dry under high vacuum for 1 hour then purge with argon 2–3 times. Inject 5 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) into the flask, place the flask in an ice bath on top of a magnetic stirring plate.

  • 2

    Weigh diphenylditelluride (200 mg, 0.5 mmol) in a 5 mL round-bottom flask. Dry under high vacuum for 1 hour, purge the flask with argon 2–3 times. Inject 5 mL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) into the flask, shake it gently until the compound completely dissolved.

  • 3

    Transfer the diphenylditelluride solution to a 5-mL syringe through an 18-G needle and inject it to the cooled and stirred NaBH4 suspension in THF. (To balance pressure during the transfer, attach an Ar balloon when necessary.)

  • 4

    Slowly inject several drops of anhydrous ethanol. Allow the reaction proceed at 0°C until the solution turns colorless. (Add a few more drops of ethanol when necessary.)

For uridine nucleoside
  • 5a

    Dissolve starting material S.1 (0.285g, 0.5 mmol) in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF, 5 mL) and inject the prepared Te-solution slowly into reaction mixture.

For thymidine nucleoside
  • 5b

    Dissolve starting material S.2 (0.292 g, 0.5 mmol) in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF, 5 mL) and inject the Te-solution slowly into reaction mixture.

  • 6

    Warm up the reaction flask to room temperature naturally and heat it to 50°C (oil bath) for three hours.

  • 7

    Monitor reaction by TLC using 4% MeOH in CH2Cl2.

Work up procedure

  • 8

    After the reaction is complete, concentrate the reaction mixture to dryness on a rotary evaporator.

  • 9

    Dissolve the residue in 50 mL of CH2Cl2 and 20 mL of H2O. Transfer the mixture in to a 125 mL separatory funnel. Wash the organic layer (bottom) sequentially with 20 mL of H2O twice, 20 mL of brine twice.

  • 10

    Collect organic layer in a 100 mL oven-dried beaker. Add 1g anhydrous MgSO4, wait for 15 min, filter off the drying agent. Evaporate solvent by a rotary evaporator to afford crude product.

  • 11

    Dissolve crude compound with 1 mL CH2Cl2 and load it on a silica gel column which is pre-equilibrated with CH2Cl2. Elute column with pure CH2Cl2 and then a gradient elution with 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2% and 3% MeOH in CH2Cl2. Collect fractions and monitor by TLC (4% MeOH in CH2Cl2).

  • 12

    Combine desired fractions, evaporate solvent on a rotary evaporator and dry under high vacuum. Obtain compound S.3a and S.4a as light yellow color solid (S.3a: 310 mg, 80% yield; S.4b: 292 mg, 78% yield)

  • 13

    Characterize products by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS.

    S.3a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=3.45-3.46 (m, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.92-3.95 (m, 1H), 4.24 (m, 1H), 4.54-4.57 (m, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81-6.86 (m, 4H), 7.19-7.37 (m, 12H), 7.45 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=36.9, 55.3, 63.9, 85.5, 87.2, 91.6, 102.5, 109.6, 113.3, 127.2, 127.8, 128.1, 128.1, 128.7, 129.5, 130.1, 135.2, 140.2, 144.2, 150.2, 158.7, 162.7; HRMS: m/z : calcd for C36H34N2O7TeNa: 759.1326, found: 759.1316 [M+Na]+.

    S.4a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=1.21 (s, 3H), 3.35-3.52 (m, 2H), 3.81 (s, 6H), 3.98-4.01 (m, 1H), 4.22 (m, 1H), 4.55 (m, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1H), 6.81-6.84 (m, 4H), 7.16-7.35 (m, 15H), 7.83 (m, 2H), 8.17 (b, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=11.5, 36.8, 55.3, 63.9, 85.2, 87.2, 91.0, 109.5, 111.3, 113.3, 127.2, 128.0, 128.1, 128.6, 129.6, 130.1, 135.0,135.2, 140.3, 144.2, 150.4, 158.8, 163.1; HRMS: m/z : calcd for C37H36N2O7TeNa: 773.1477, found: 773.1475 [M+Na+]+.

Prepare phosphoramidite

  • 14

    Dry a 25 mL flask containing S.3a (500 mg, 0.68 mmol) or S.4a (510 mg, 0.68 mmol) and a stir bar with vacuum pump for 1 hour, then purge the flask with argon.

  • 15

    Inject 2.5 mL methylene chloride and keep flask under ice bath.

  • 16

    Inject N, N-diisopropylethylamine (0.17 mL, 1.03 mmol, 1.5 eq) and 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropyl-chlorophosphoramidite (195 mg, 0.83 mmol, 1.2 eq). Stir it for 10 min under an ice bath.

  • 17

    Remove the ice bath and continue stirring it for 45 min at room temperature. Monitor reaction by TLC using 4% MeOH in CH2Cl2.

    At room temperature, the reaction is completed in 45 minutes, generating a mixture of two diastereomers (product Rf = 0.63 and 0.68).

  • 18

    Quench the reaction by adding 2 mL saturated aqueous NaHCO3, and stir for 5 min.

  • 19

    Extract product with methylene chloride (3x5 mL). Combine the organic layers and wash it with saturated aqueous NaCl.

  • 20

    Dry the organic layer with anhydrous Na2SO4 and filter off drying agent.

  • 21

    Concentrate CH2Cl2 layer to about 2 mL by a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure.

  • 22

    Prepare 100 mL anhydrous petroleum ether in a 125 mL erlenmeyer flask, add the concentrated CH2Cl2 solution into petroleum ether dropwise with vigorous stirring. White precipitate will form during addition.

  • 23

    Carefully decant the petroleum ether solution, dissolve the precipitate again with 2 mL CH2Cl2 then load it onto Al2O3 column that is pre-equilibrated by CH2Cl2/Hexane (1:1)

  • 24

    Elute the column with CH2Cl2/EtOAc (7:3). Collect fractions, remove the solvents by rotary evaporator. Dry the product under high vacuumn, offering product S.5a or S.6a (570 mg) as a white foamy solid.

  • 25

    Characterize product by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS.

    S.5a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=1.13-1.35 (m, 24H), 2.37 and 2.68 (2x t, J=6.4Hz, 4H), 3.38-3.69 (m, 12H), 3.83 (s, 12H), 3.90-4.03 (m, 2H), 4.32 and 4.38 (2x m, 2H), 4.67-4.82 (m, 2H), 4.95 and 5.00 (2x d, J=8 Hz, 2H), 6.73 and 6.75 (2x d, J=5.8 Hz, 2H) , 6.83-6.86 (m, 8H), 7.16-7.37 (m, 26H), 7.76 (br, 2H), 7.81-7.85 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=20.13, 20.20, 20.44, 20.51, 24.50, 24.61, 24.69, 25.23, 33.85, 34.43, 43.36, 43.40, 43.49, 43.52 , 55.29, 57.68, 57.87, 59.04, 59.23, 63.58, 63.73, 74.91 and 75.09, 84.97, 87.29, 89.38, 111.69, 113.46, 117.29, 126.99, 127.81, 128.54, 130.21, 130.42, 135.22, 135.40, 135.44, 144.10, 150.37, 158.85, 163.34; 31P NMR (160 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=148.6, 149.2; HRMS: m/z : calcd for C45H52N4O8PTe: 937.2579, found: 937.2578 [M+H]+.

    S.6a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=1.10-1.42 (m, 24H), 2.34 and 2.66 (2x t, J=6.4Hz, 4H), 3.35-3.69 (m, 12H), 3.83 (s, 12H), 3.92-4.05 (m, 2H), 4.31 and 4.37 (2x m, 2H), 4.65-4.82 (m, 2H), 6.71 and 6.74 (2x d, J=5.8 Hz, 2H) , 6.84-6.86 (m, 8H), 7.16-7.37 (m, 26H), 7.77 (br, 2H), 7.80-7.84 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=11.69, 20.12, 20.22, 20.43, 20.53, 24.49, 24.60, 24.67, 25.24, 33.85, 34.43, 43.37, 43.40, 43.49, 43.53 , 55.27, 57.67, 57.88, 59.05, 59.25, 63.57, 63.74, 74.92 and 75.09, 84.97, 87.27, 89.38, 111.68, 113.45, 117.28, 126.98, 127.81, 128.54, 130.20, 130.39, 135.24, 135.38, 135.42, 144.11, 150.35, 158.87, 163.36; 31P NMR (160 MHz, CDCl3 , 25 ºC): δ=148.4, 149.3; HRMS: m/z : calcd for C46H53N4 O8 PTeNa: 973.2561, found: 973.2560 [M+Na+]+.

BASIC PROTOCOL 2: PREPARATION OF THE 2’-METHYLTELLANYL PHOSPHORAMIDITE

In the case of introducing methyltelluride to nucleoside, based on our previous observation, the reducing power of NaBH4 is not sufficient for dimethyl ditelluride reagent. In order to generate methyltelluride nucleophile efficiently, as shown in Figure 1, we apply LiAlH4 as reducing agent. The reaction yield is further optimized by lowering temperature to 0°C. Moreover, crown ether (12-crown-4) is applied to chelate lithium cation for the purpose of enhancing methyltelluride’s nucleophilicity. The desired product can be identified by tellurium isotope distribution in high resolution mass spectrum or a characteristic peak at −21.2ppm in 13C NMR spectrum. Phosphoramidite synthesis procedures are the same as described in Basic Protocol 1.

Additional Materials (Also see Basic Protocol 1)

  • Dimethyl ditelluride (CH3TeTeCH3, Organometallics)

  • 1M LiAlH4 Solution in THF,

  • 12-crown-4 (1,4,7,10-tetraoxacyclododecane)

Introduction of Methyltelluride functionality

  • 1

    Place a stir bar in an oven-dried 25 mL round bottom flask, dry by vacuum pump, and purge it with argon 2–3 times to deplete oxygen.

  • 2

    Inject 10 mL anhydrous THF into flask, followed by injection of dimethyl ditelluride (CH3TeTeCH3, 0.2 mL, 1.1 mmol)

  • 3

    Keep the reaction flask under an ice bath; slowly inject 1 M LiAlH4 Solution in THF (0.55 mL, 0.55 mmol); the addition may take 5 min for the optimal result.

  • 4

    After the solution turns slightly yellow (from a dark red), add 12-crown-4 (0.6 mmol, 0.1 mL) and stir the reaction mixture for 20 min under an ice bath.

For uridine derivative
  • 5a

    Dissolve the starting material (S.1 0.58 g, 1.0 mmol) in 2 mL THF, add the THF solution into reaction mixture dropwise under an ice bath.

For thymidine derivative
  • 5b

    Dissolve the starting material (S.2 0.59 g, 1.0 mmol) in 2 mL THF, add the THF solution into reaction mixture dropwise under an ice bath.

  • 6

    Monitor reaction by TLC (5% CH3OH in CH2Cl2) (Rf approximately 0.4). The reaction yield will reach maximum in 4–5 hours (approximately 50–60% yield). Before too much byproduct forms, quench the reaction by adding 10 mL saturated sodium chloride aqueous solution.

  • 7

    Transfer the mixture to a 125 mL separatory funnel, add 30 mL CH2Cl2, and shake gently to allow layers separation. Wash the organic layer (bottom) sequentially with 20 mL of H2O twice and 20 mL of brine twice.

  • 8

    Collect organic layer in a 100 mL oven-dried beaker. Add 1g anhydrous MgSO4, wait for 15 min, filter off the drying agent. Evaporate solvent by a rotary evaporator to afford crude product.

  • 9

    Purify the residue by column chromatography (silica gel column equilibrated by CH2Cl2, elute column by gradient elution (CH3OH in CH2Cl2, 0–3% v/v)

  • 10

    Combine desired fractions and evaporate the solvents under reduced pressure to give compound S.3b or S.4b as a color foamy product in 40%-47% yield.

  • 11

    Characterize products by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS.

    S.3b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=2.0 (s, 3H), 2.5 (s, 1H), 3.52 (dd, J1=2.8 Hz, J2=7.2Hz, 2H), 3.69 (t, J= 4 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 6H), 4.21-4.23 (m, 1H), 4.31-4.36 (m, 1H), 5.40 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (d, J= 8.4Hz, 1H) , 6.86-6.88 (m, 4H), 7.26-7.39 (m, 9H), 7.77 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (br, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ= −21.2, 33.35, 55.29, 63.37, 73.75, 84.51, 87.29, 89.90, 102.73, 113.35, 127.28, 128.07, 130.08, 135.12, 139.77, 144.20, 150.23, 158.79, 162.64; HRMS: m/z : calcd for C31H31N2O7Te: 673.1194, found: 673.1204 [M-H].

    S.4b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=1.43 (s, 3H), 1.99 (s, 3H), 3.47 (dd, J1=1.6 Hz, J2= 9.6Hz, 2H), 3.70-3.74 (m, 1H), 3.82 (s, 6H), 4.24-4.25 (m, 1H), 4.36-4.37 (m, 1H), 6.37 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.85-6.87 (m, 4H), 7.26-7.40 (m, 9H), 7.60 (s, 1H), 8.03 (br, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ= −20.8, 11.71, 33.11, 55.29, 63.86, 74.62, 84.64, 87.19, 89.90, 111.75, 113.32, 127.29, 128.09, 129.14, 135.20, 135.16, 144.21, 150.48, 158.82, 163.41; HRMS: m/z: calcd for C32H33N2O7Te: 687.1350, found: 687.1354 [M-H+].

Prepare phosphoramidite

For uridine derivative
  • 12a

    Apply step 14 to 24 in Basic Protocol 1 by using S.3b (460 mg, 0.68 mmol) to obtain S.5b as the product.

For thymidine derivative
  • 12b

    Apply step 14 to 24 in Basic Protocol 1 by using S.4b (468 mg, 0.68 mmol) to obtain S.6b as the product.

  • 13

    Characterize product by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS.

    S.5b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=0.85-1.38 (m, 24H), 1.98 and 1.99 (2x s, 6H), 2.41 and 2.67 (2x t, J=7.6Hz, 4H), 3.42-3.69 (m, 12H), 3.83 (s, 12H), 3.89-4.05 (m, 4H), 4.22 and 4.30 (2x m, 2H), 4.57-4.77 (m, 2H), 6.43 and 6.55 (2x d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H) , 6.80-6.92 (m, 8H), 7.16-7.45 (m, 18), 7.78 and 7.79 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ= -21.32, 19.16, 19.66, 20.88, 24.81, 24.44, 43.30, 43.46, 46.34, 47.53, 51.47 and 51.85, 55.62, 57.03, 58.39, 62.52, 73.36, 73.67, 84.57, 87.35, 88.12, 103.39, 113.42, 117.28, 127.21, 127.94, 128.36, 130.19, 130.25, 135.17, 135.38, 139.53, 144.20, 150.42, 158.80, 163.19. 31P NMR (160 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=148.5, 149.2; ESI-TOF: m/z calcd for C40H48N4O8PTe: 873.2272, found 873.2264.

    S.6b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ= 0.89-1.42 (m, 24H), 1.40 (2x s, 6H), 2.10 (2x s, 6H), 2.42 and 2.69 (2x t, J =7.8 Hz, 4H), 3.48 -3.72 (m, 12H), 3.82 (s, 12H), 3.90-4.05 (m, 2H), 4.22 and 4.31 (2x m, 2H), 4.58-4.72 (m, 2H), 6.42 (d, J =8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.79-6.92 (m, 8H), 7.20-7.45 (m, 18H), 7.62 (2x s, 2H), 8.25 (br, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3 , 25 ºC): δ= -21.32, 4.58, 4.72, 20.13, 20.16, 20.48, 20.55, 22.52, 24.39, 24.47, 24.59, 24.68, 24.76,24.83, 43.21, 43.32, 43.34, 43.41, 46.35, 46.42, 47.37, 47.42, 50.36, 55.32, 63.29, 63.33, 74.90, 75.09, 84.99, 87.28, 89.36, 111.70, 113.44, 117.29, 126.99, 127.83, 128.55, 130.20, 130.41, 135.23, 135.41, 135.44, 144.11, 150.38, 158.86, 163.35. 31P NMR (160 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ºC): δ=148.6, 149.5; ESI-TOF: m/z calcd for C41H52N4O8PTe: 889.2585, found 889.2587.

BASIC PROTOCOL 3: SYNTHESIS, PURIFICATION, AND CHARACTERIZATION OF OLIGONUCLEOTIDES CONTAINING 2’-TELLERIUM FUCTIONALITY

The Te-U/T posphoramidite synthesized from Basic Protocol 1 or Basic Protocol 2 is diluted to desired concentration then attached to DNA synthesizer. Apply 2’-PhTe-U/T phosphoramidite from Basic Protocol 1 for acquiring oligonucleotides contains 2’-PhTe functionality to create a bulky 2’-substitutent. Or accordingly, use 2’-MeTe-U/T phosphoramidite from Basic Protocol 2 when DNA contains 2’-MeTe groups is needed. All oligonucleotides synthesis is carried out using ABI3400 DNA/RNA synthesizer on 1.0-μmol scale. All native monomers are ultra-mild phosphoramidites with 0.1 M concentration in anhydrous acetonitrile; the Te-modified phsophoramidites are prepared with 0.06 M concentration in anhydrous acetonitrile. The oligonucleotide synthesis works from 3’ to 5’ end; the first nucleotide is attached to controlled-pored glass (CPG) through a succinyl linkage. The deblocking step uses 3% trichloroacetic acid in methylene chloride to remove trityl group. The coupling step uses 0.3 M (benzylmercapto)-1H-tetrazole (5-BMT) solution in acetonitrile as activator. The coupling time for the Te-modified phosphoramidites is 60 seconds. The capping step uses phenoxyacetic anhydride in pyridine/THF to block the failure oligonucleotides. The oxidation step is carried out by treating with 0.02 M iodine in THF/Pyridine/H2O. All oligonucleotides are prepared in 5’-DMTr-on form. In order to cleave oligonucleotides from CPG beads and fully deprotect them, after oligonucleotide synthesis, the CPG beads are dried by argon stream and treated with 1 mL 0.05 M K2CO3 in methanol solution for 8 hours at room temperature. After centrifugation, the supernant is separated and neutralized with 0.1 M HOAc solution and treated with 5 μL of 1 M borane in THF before HPLC analysis and purification. The 5’-DMTr deprotection of DNAs is performed in a 3% trichloroacetic acid solution for 3 min, followed by neutralization and petroleum ether extraction to remove DMTr-OH.

Materials

  • 2’-Te-modified U and T phosphoramidites (Basic Protocol 1, Basic Protocol 2)

  • Acetonitrile (CH3CN), anhydrous (Glen Research)

  • Ultra mild DNA phosphoramidite & reagent: (Glen research; diluted to 0.1 M in anhydrous acetonitrile attaching to the synthesizer)

    • Pac-dA-CEPhosphoramidite: 5’-dimethoxytrityl-N-phenoxyacetyl-2’-deoxyadenosine,

    • 3’-[(2-cyanoethyl)-(N, N-diisopropyl)]-phosphoramidite

    • iPr-Pac-dG-CE phosphoramidite:

    • 5’-Dimethoxytrityl-N-p-isopropyl-phenoxyacetyl-2’-deoxyguanosine,

    • 3’-[(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropyl)]-phosphoramidite

    • Ac-dC-CE Phosphoramidite: 5’-dimethoxytrityl-N-acetyl-2’-deoxycytidine,3’-[(2-cyanoethyl)- (N,N-diisopropyl)]-phosphoramidite

    • dT-CE Phosphoramidite: 5’-dimethoxytrityl-2’-deoxythymidine,3’-[(2-cyanoethyl)- (N,N-diisopropyl)]-phosphoramidite

    • Deblocking Mix: 3% TCA (trichloroacetic acid) in DCM (dichloromethane)

    • Activator: 0.25 M 5-benzylthio-1H-tetrazole in acetonitrile

    • CapA: THF/Pyridine/PacO (Tetrahydrofuran 85%, Pyridine 10%, Phenoxyacetic anhydride 5%)

    • CapB: 16% MeIm (1-methylimidazole) in THF

    • Oxidizing Solution: 0.02 M I2 in THF/Pyridine/H2O (Iodine 2.5%, Tetrahydrofuran 75.5%,

  • Pyridine 20%, Water 2%)

  • 0.05 M K2CO3 in methanol

  • 2 M triethylammonium acetate (TEAA) buffer, pH 7.0

  • Acetonitrile (CH3CN), HPLC grade

  • 30% aqueous trichloroacetic acid (TCA)

  • Argon

  • 2- mL eppendorf tube

  • HPLC system (optional) with detector at 260 and/or 369 nm

  • HPLC column: 21.2 × 250–mm Zorbax RX-C8 (Agilent Technology) or 21 × 250–mm XB-C18 (Welch Materials)

  • Lyophilizer

Te modified Oligonuleotide synthesis

  1. Dissolve the Te-modified phosphoramidite in anhydrous CH3CN at 0.06 M concentration and attach the solution bottle to synthesizer.

  2. Load a DNA synthesis column with 1 μmol (i.e., 25 mg for 40 μmol/g beads) of DNA CPG (controlled pore glass) support corresponding to the first nucleotide at 3’-end of DNA.

  3. Perform automated solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis on DMTr-on mode.

  4. When the synthesis is done, remove the column from synthesizer and dry it by an argon stream.

  5. Transfer the CPG support into a 2-mL eppendof tube, and add 1 mL of 0.05 M K2CO3 in methanol. The beads are incubated for 6–8 hours at room temperature to cleave oligonucleotides from CPG support. The deprotecting solution also removes all the protecting groups on nucleobases and phosphate backbones, while keeping the 5’-DMTr group intact.

  6. Transfer the supernatant to a clean 2-mL eppendof tube. Add 200 μL water to wash the CPG support and vortex the tube before centrifugation for 2min. Transfer the supernatant to combine with the deprotected oligonucleotide solution. Repeat this washing procedure twice.

  7. Evaporate methanol from the combined supernatant from step 6 in a Speedvac (i.e., 30 min at the room temperature)

  8. Purify the sample by RP-HPLC using the following recommended conditions:

    • Column: 21.2 × 250–mm Zorbax RX-C8

    • Buffer A: 20 mM TEAA buffer, pH 7.0

    • Buffer B: 50% CH3CN in buffer A

    • Gradient: 0% to 100% buffer B over 20 min

    • Flow rate: 6 mL/min

    • Detection wavelength: 260 nm.

  9. Collect the DMTr-On fraction (retention time: approximately 21 min) and lyophilize it. A typical profile of RP-HPLC analysis for DMTr-on Te-DNA is present in Figure 2.

  10. Dissolve the residue in 0.2 mL water, add 20 μL of 30% TCA aqueous solution to it, and then vortex it for 5 min

  11. Neutralize the solution to pH 7.0 by adding 20 μL of 2.0 M TEAA buffer.

  12. Centrifuge the tube at 10,000 rpm (10,600 g) for 2 min and transfer the supernatant to another tube.

  13. Purify the sample again by RP-HPLC using the same buffer condition but change gradient to 0% to 70% buffer B over 20 min.

  14. Collect the fraction with a retention time around 17 min and lyophilize it to dryness.

  15. Fill the tube with argon and store it at −80 °C.

  16. Analyze the oligonucleotide by RP-HPLC

  17. The Te-oligonucleotides are analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS using 3-hydroxypicolinic acid (3-HPA)/diammonium citrate (9:1) as a matrix.

  18. UV-melting temperatures of the Te-DNAs are analyzed with the recommended buffer system [50 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 (pH 6.5), 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

HPLC analysis of the Te-DNA: 5’-DMTr-G(2’-TePh-dU)GTACAC-3’. This analysis was performed on a Zorbax SB-C18 column (4.6 x 250 mm) with a linear gradient from buffer A (20 mM TEAAc: triethylammonium acetate, pH 7.1) to 100% buffer B (50% acetonitrile in 20 mM TEAAc) in 20 min.; the retention time of the full-length Te-DNA is 20.7 min.

COMMENTARY

Background information

From SeNA to TeNA

Selenium derivatization of protein has been widely used for protein X-ray crystallography, where selenium serves as a scattering center for multi-wavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD).(Hendrickson, et al. 1990, Hendrickson 1991, Hendrickson 2000) Inspired by this revolutionary breakthrough in protein structure determination, our research group has pioneered and developed selenium-derivatized nucleic acids (SeNA) for nucleic acid structure determination. (Sheng and Huang 2008, Caton-Williams and Huang 2008) After more than 12 years of systematic study, selenium modification on different positions of DNAs and RNAs have been achieved by us and other research groups, including the 2’-position (Du, et al. 2002, Carrasco, et al. 2004, Hobartner and Micura 2004, Moroder, et al. 2006, Jiang, et al. 2007, Sheng, et al. 2007), 4’-position (Jeong, et al. 2008, Watts, et al. 2008, Alexander, et al. 2010), 5’ (Carrasco, et al. 2001, Zhang and Huang 2011), phosphate backbone (Wilds, et al. 2002, Carrasco, et al. 2004, Carrasco, et al. 2006, Brandt, et al. 2006) and the nucleobases (Salon, et al. 2007, Hassan, et al. 2009, Hassan, et al. 2010). Driven by these encouraging results, the tellurium-modified oligonucleotides were first synthesized by our research group for studying the impact of tellurium in nucleic acid X-ray crystallography. Tellurium, a chalcogen element following selenium in group VI in periodic table, has not been well studied in biomolecules due to its synthetic difficulty, caused by tellurium’s metallic property. However, tellurium was successfully incorporated into proteins in 1989 through Te-resistant fungi grown in the presence of tellurite on a sulphur-free medium.(Ramadan, et al. 1989) Later, Boles and co-workers reported the expression of telluromethionine (TeMet) dihydrofolate reductase in 1994,(Boles, et al. 1994) and the Te-incorporation technique was further optimized to efficiently introduce TeMet into several proteins.(Besse, et al. 1997) Furthermore, the Te-protein stability under X-ray radiation and the isomorphism of the Te-proteins were confirmed, and more tellurium chemistry has also been developed.(Budisa, et al. 1995, Farina, et al. 2004, Karnbrock, et al. 1996)

Application of TeNA

Tellurium has a larger atomic radius (1.35 Å), compared with selenium (1.17 Å), sulfur (1.04 Å), and oxygen (0.73 Å). Te can generate clear isomorphous signals by just using the normal in-house X-ray source. This property makes tellurium modification a potential methodology for structure determination without using a synchrotron facility. Besides being a scattering center in X-ray crystallography, tellurium has highest electron delocalization ability among O, S, Se and Te, due to its strong metallicity. This metallic property can facilitate electron delocalization in a DNA duplex with relative electron deficiency. A higher visibility and conductivity of Te-DNAs have also been observed under STM imaging.(Sheng, et al. 2011) Moreover, Te-modified DNA can be used for studying DNA damaging, especially for DNA fragmentation and base damaging.(Sheng, et al. 2009) Under an elevated temperature (such as 50 °C), a site-specific cleavage of the 2’-TePh DNA happened at the modification site in the presence of either B2H6 or I2. The cleavage of 2’-TePh-modified DNA was detected by mass spectrometry analysis (Figure 3). This result is consistent with the previous observation of the 2’,3’ elimination of the 2’-Te-nucleosides.(Sheng, et al. 2008) This site-specific fragmentation provides a good model for DNA damage study. Furthermore, in a 2’-TeMe-modified DNA 9-mer [5’-ATGG(2’-TeMe-dU)GCTC-3’], the base elimination reaction (1’,2’ elimination) can be observed (Figure 4). It is surprising that the 2’-Te-Ph functionality generates the fragmented product, while the 2’-Te-Me functionality creates the abasic product. These two Te-DNA modification strategies can be useful in investigation of the site-specific DNA cleavage and base damage (Chen and Stubbe 2004, Usui, et al. 2008, Maul, et al. 2008).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cleavage of the 2’-TePh-modified DNA 8-mer [5’-G(2’-TePh-dU)GT ACAC-3’]. (A) before heating, the molecular formula: C83H101N30O46P7Te, [M-H+]: 2599.3; (B) after fragmentation with either I2 or B2H6 at 50 °C, the fragmented 6-mer (5’-p-GTACAC-3’); the 6-mer molecular formula: C58H74N23O36P6, [M-H+]: 1856.2 calculated; its observed molecular mass peak:1856.3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

MALDI-TOF analysis of the reductive debase of the 2’-TeMe modified sequence 5’-ATGG(2’-TeMe-U)GCTC-3’. Full length product formula: C88H112N32O54P8Te, [M-H+]: 2857.4 , observed: 2857.2. Debased product formula: C83H108N30O52P8, [M-H+]:2603.5, observed 2603.4.

It’s also note worthy that a small portion of the Te-DNA can be oxidized to telluroxide-DNA during the solid phase synthesis and purification (Figure 5). The redox property of Te-modified DNA can be revealed by HPLC analysis. The tellurium functionality in Te-DNA can be oxidized to telluoxide by treating with I2, and the telluoxide-DNA can be reduced back to Te-DNA by adding B2H6. The oxidizing and reducing process can be conveniently monitored by analytical HPLC (Figure 6). This provides an efficient approach for recovering oxidized Te-DNA during DNA synthesis and purification and also allows further investigation of the redox property of the Te-DNA. The fragmentation, base elimination and redox properties are clearly illustrated in Figure 7.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

MALDI-TOF MS analysis of the Te-DNA [5’-G(2’-TePh-dU)GTACAC-3’]. The peak with a mass of M+16 indicates formation of the telluoxide.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Redox property of 2’-TePh-DNA 8-mer [5’-G(2’-TePh-dU)GTACAC] with the I2 and B2H6 treatments. 1): the non-oxidized Te-DNA; 2): the Te-DNA after I2 treatment; 3): the co-injection of the non-oxidized and oxidized Te-DNAs; 4): the oxidized Te-DNA after B2H6 treatment.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

This scheme shows the fragmentation, base elimination and redox properties of Te-DNA

Thermo-denaturation experiment of the Te-DNA can also be done to test the thermo stability of the Te-DNA duplex (Figure 8). Due to the bulkiness of 2’-PhTe functionality, we expect more perturbation in 2’-PhTe-DNA than that in 2’-MeTe or native DNA. In the self-complementary duplex [5’-G(2’-TeX-dU)GTACAC-3’, X=Ph or Me]2, where double Te-modifications were introduced to this short DNA duplex, the melting temperatures dropped by 15 ºC (7.5 ºC per modification) in 2’-TePh-DNA duplex, 10 ºC (5 ºC per modification) in 2’-TeMe-DNA duplex compared with the native duplex (Sheng, et al. 2009). When introducing the Te-functionalities to a non-self-complementary duplex [5’-C(2’-TeX-dU)TCTTGTCCG-3’ and 5’-CGGACAAGA-AG-3’, X=Me or Ph], it was observed that the melting temperatures of the native, 2’-TeMe and 2’-TePh duplexes were 44.0, 40.7 and 36.8 ºC, respectively. Obviously, the perturbation caused by the 2’-Te-functionality leads to a decrease of duplex stability and this duplex destabilization property may be useful in investigating the formation of DNA or RNA loop, bulge, and other secondary structure.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Normalized thermo-denaturation curves of the DNA duplexes [5’-C(2’-TeX-dU)TCTTGTCCG-3’&3’-CGGACAAGAAG-5’, X=Me or Ph]. The samples (1 mM duplex) were heated from 6 to 75 ºC with a rate of 0.5 ºC/min. The red, blue and green curves represent the native, 2’-TeMe and 2’-TePh duplex, respectively. The average Tm (four measurements): 44.0 ± 0.1 ºC, 40.7 ± 0.1 ºC and 36.8 ± 0.2 ºC, respectively.

Critical Parameters and Trouble Shooting

Routine techniques for organic lab operation are required, such as extraction, solvent evaporation, TLC analysis and chromatography purification. General protocol for organic lab safety has to be followed properly. The critical step during the synthesis process is introduction of the tellurium functionality. Keeping a dry and oxygen-free atmosphere is very critical. When performing silica gel column purification for any DMTr-on nucleosides, adding 0.5–1% trithylamine in solvent mixture is highly recommended in order to prevent detritylation during the purification. For making the Te-phosphoramidites, the N,N,N,N-tetraisopropylphosphoramidite may also be used as an alternative reagent in the presence of 5-(benzylmercapto)-1H-tetrazole (5-BMT).

Anticipated Results

2’-Te-modified phosphoramidites can be synthesized with good to moderate yield. The incorporation of the 2’-Te modified nucleotides into oligonucleotide can be achieved by solid-phase synthesis with high yields, even when the concentration of the modified phosphoramidites is adjusted to 0.06 M instead of 0.1 M. After deprotection and purification, a Te-DNA solution can be obtained and stored at −80 °C in argon atmosphere. The quality of the Te-DNA can be analyzed by RP-HPLC and MALDI-Mass (Table 1). The redox property of Te-DNA can be examined by treating with I2/BH3 followed by RP-HPLC analysis. The thermo-stability of Te-DNA duplex can be tested by UV-melting experiment.

Table 1.

MALDI-TOF analysis of 2’-Te modified oligonucleotides.

DNA sequences Formula MS [M-H+] (Calcd.)
G(2’-TeMe-dU)GTACAC C78H99N30O46P7Te 2536.1 (2536.2)
ATGG(2’-TeMe-dU)GCTC C88H112N32O54P8Te 2856.3 (2856.4)
G(2’-TePh-dU)GTACAC C83H101N30O46P7Te 2599.4 (2599.3)
ATGG(2’-TePh-dU)GCTC C93H114N32O54P8Te 2919.0 (2918.5)
GCG(2’-TePh-dU)ATACGC C102H125N38O58P9Te 3218.0 (3216.7)
G(2’-TePh-dU)GTACAC C84H103N30O46P7Te 2611.8 (2612.3)
ATGG(2’-TePh-dU)GCTC C94H116N32O54P8Te 2933.3 (2932.5)
CT(2’-TePh-dU)CTTGTCCG C111H140N32O69P10Te 3464.5 (3465.4)
CT(2’-TeMe-dU)CTTGTCCG C106H138N32O69P10Te 3400.5 (3401.8)

Time Considerations

With the basic synthetic skills, the synthesis of a 2’-Te-phosphoramidite can be accomplished in one week. The time for oligonucleotides synthesis, purification, and analysis is also approximately one week.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the following grants:

  1. Distinguished GCC Cancer Clinicians and Scientists Award

  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH, GM095086)

  3. National Science Foundation (NSF, MCB-0824837)

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander V, Choi WJ, Chun J, Kim HO, Jeon JH, Tosh DK, Lee HW, Chandra G, Choi J, Jeong LS. A New DNA Building Block, 4′-Selenothymidine: Synthesis and Modification to 4 ′-Seleno-AZT as a Potential Anti-HIV Agent. Organic Letters. 2010;12:2242–2245. doi: 10.1021/ol1005906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Besse D, Budisa N, Karnbrock W, Minks C, Musiol HJ, Pegoraro S, Siedler F, Weyher E, Moroder L. Chalcogen-analogs of amino acids. Their use in X-ray crystallographic and folding studies of peptides and proteins. Biological Chemistry. 1997;378:211–218. doi: 10.1515/bchm.1997.378.3-4.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boles JO, Lewinski K, Kunkle M, Odom JD, Dunlap B, Lebioda L, Hatada M. Bio-incorporation of telluromethionine into buried residues of dihydrofolate reductase. Nature structural biology. 1994;1:283–284. doi: 10.1038/nsb0594-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brandt G, Carrasco N, Huang Z. Efficient substrate cleavage catalyzed by hammerhead ribozymes derivatized with selenium for X-ray crystallography. Biochemistry. 2006;45:8972–8977. doi: 10.1021/bi060455m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Budisa N, Steipe B, Demange P, Eckerskorn C, Kellermann J, Huber R. High-level biosynthetic substitution of methionine in proteins by its analogs 2-aminohexanoic acid, selenomethionine, telluromethionine and ethionine in Escherichia coli. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1995;230:788–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20622.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrasco N, Ginsburg D, Du Q, Huang Z. Synthesis of selenium-derivatized nucleosides and oligonucleotides for X-ray crystallography. Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids. 2001;20:1723–1734. doi: 10.1081/NCN-100105907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carrasco N, Huang Z. Enzymatic synthesis of phosphoroselenoate DNA using thymidine 5 ’-(alpha-P-seleno)triphosphate and DNA polymerase for X-ray crystallography via MAD. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126:448–449. doi: 10.1021/ja0383221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carrasco N, Buzin Y, Tyson E, Halpert E, Huang Z. Selenium derivatization and crystallization of DNA and RNA oligonucleotides for X-ray crystallography using multiple anomalous dispersion. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:1638–1646. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carrasco N, Caton-Williams J, Brandt G, Wang SM, Huang Z. Efficient enzymatic synthesis of phosphoroselenoate RNA by using adenosine 5 ’-(alpha-P-seleno)triphosphate. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 2006;45:94–97. doi: 10.1002/anie.200502215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caton-Williams J, Huang Z. Biochemistry of Selenium-Derivatized Naturally Occurring and Unnatural Nucleic Acids. Chemistry & Biodiversity. 2008;5:396–407. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen J, Stubbe J. Synthesis and characterization of oligonucleotides containing a 4’-keto abasic site. Biochemistry. 2004;43:5278–5286. doi: 10.1021/bi0495376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Q, Carrasco N, Teplova M, Wilds CJ, Egli M, Huang Z. Internal derivatization of oligonucleotides with selenium for X-ray crystallography using MAD. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;124:24–25. doi: 10.1021/ja0171097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Farina M, Soares FA, Zeni G, Souza DO, Rocha JB. Additive pro-oxidative effects of methylmercury and ebselen in liver from suckling rat pups. Toxicology Letters. 2004;146:227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hassan AEA, Sheng J, Jiang JS, Zhang W, Huang Z. Synthesis and Crystallographic Analysis of 5-Se-Thymidine DNAs. Organic Letters. 2009;11:2503–2506. doi: 10.1021/ol9004867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hassan AEA, Sheng J, Zhang W, Huang Z. High Fidelity of Base Pairing by 2-Selenothymidine in DNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132:2120–2121. doi: 10.1021/ja909330m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hendrickson WA, Horton JR, LeMaster DM. Selenomethionyl proteins produced for analysis by multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD): a vehicle for direct determination of three-dimensional structure. The EMBO journal. 1990;9:1665–1672. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08287.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hendrickson WA. Determination of macromolecular structures from anomalous diffraction of synchrotron radiation. Science. 1991;254:51–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1925561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hendrickson WA. Synchrotron crystallography. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2000;25:637–643. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01721-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hobartner C, Micura R. Chemical synthesis of selenium-modified Oligoribonucleotides and their enzymatic ligation leading to an U6SnRNA stem-loop segment. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126:1141–1149. doi: 10.1021/ja038481k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jeong LS, Tosh DK, Kim HO, Wang T, Hou X, Yun HS, Kwon Y, Lee SK, Choi J, Zhao LX. First synthesis of 4’-selenonucleosides showing unusual Southern conformation. Organic Letters. 2008;10:209–212. doi: 10.1021/ol7025558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang JS, Sheng J, Carrasco N, Huang Z. Selenium derivatization of nucleic acids for crystallography. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35:477–485. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karnbrock W, Weyher E, Budisa N, Huber R, Moroder L. A New Efficient Synthesis of Acetyltelluro- and Acetylselenomethionine and Their Use in the Biosynthesis of Heavy-Atom Protein Analogs. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1996;118:913–914. [Google Scholar]
  23. Maul MJ, Barends TR, Glas AF, Cryle MJ, Domratcheva T, Schneider S, Schlichting I, Carell T. Crystal structure and mechanism of a DNA (6-4) photolyase. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 2008;47:10076–10080. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moroder H, Kreutz C, Lang K, Serganov A, Micura R. Synthesis, Oxidation Behavior, Crystallization and Structure of 2‘-Methylseleno Guanosine Containing RNAs. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006;128:9909–9918. doi: 10.1021/ja0621400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramadan SE, Razak AA, Ragab AM, el-Meleigy M. Incorporation of tellurium into amino acids and proteins in a tellurium-tolerant fungi. Biological Trace Element Research. 1989;20:225–232. doi: 10.1007/BF02917437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Salon J, Sheng J, Jiang JS, Chen GX, Caton-Williams J, Huang Z. Oxygen replacement with selenium at the thymidine 4-position for the Se base pairing and crystal structure studies. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:4862–4863. doi: 10.1021/ja0680919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheng J, Jiang JS, Salon J, Huang Z. Synthesis of a 2 ’-Se-thymidine phosphoramidite and its incorporation into oligonucleotides for crystal structure study. Organic Letters. 2007;9:749–752. doi: 10.1021/ol062937w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sheng J, Huang Z. Selenium derivatization of nucleic acids for phase and structure determination in nucleic acid x-ray crystallography. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2008;9:258–271. doi: 10.3390/ijms9030258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheng J, Hassan AEA, Huang Z. New telluride-mediated elimination for novel synthesis of 2 ’-3 ’-didehydro-2 ’,3 ’-dideoxynucleosides. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2008;73:3725–3729. doi: 10.1021/jo7025806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheng J, Hassan AEA, Huang Z. Synthesis of the First Tellurium-Derivatized Oligonucleotides for Structural and Functional Studies. Chemistry-a European Journal. 2009;15:10210–10216. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheng J, Hassan AE, Zhang W, Zhou J, Xu B, Soares AS, Huang Z. Synthesis, structure and imaging of oligodeoxyribonucleotides with tellurium-nucleobase derivatization. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39:3962–3971. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Usui K, Aso M, Fukuda M, Suemune H. Photochemical generation of oligodeoxynucleotide containing a C4’-oxidized abasic site and its efficient amine modification: dependence on structure and microenvironment. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2008;73:241–248. doi: 10.1021/jo702080r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Watts JK, Johnston BD, Jayakanthan K, Wahba AS, Pinto BM, Damha MJ. Synthesis and biophysical characterization of oligonucleotides containing a 4’-selenonucleotide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130:8578–8579. doi: 10.1021/ja802205u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wilds CJ, Pattanayek R, Pan C, Wawrzak Z, Egli M. Selenium-assisted nucleic acid crystallography: use of phosphoroselenoates for MAD phasing of a DNA structure. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;124:14910–14916. doi: 10.1021/ja021058b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang W, Huang Z. Synthesis of the 5’-Se-Thymidine Phosphoramidite and Convenient Labeling of DNA Oligonucleotide. Organic Letters. 2011;13:2000–2003. doi: 10.1021/ol200397c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES