Skip to main content
Analytical Cellular Pathology: the Journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology logoLink to Analytical Cellular Pathology: the Journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology
. 2002 Jan 1;24(1):5–15. doi: 10.1155/2002/840210

Diagnostic DNA-Flow- vs. -Image-Cytometry in Effusion Cytology

Helma Motherby 1,*, Natalia Pomjanski 1, Mary Kube 1, Alexandra Boros 1, Thomas Heiden 2, Bernhard Tribukait 2, Alfred Böcking 1
PMCID: PMC4618898  PMID: 12122279

Abstract

Aims: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of flow‐ and image‐cytometry for the detection of DNA‐aneuploidy as a marker for malignant cells in effusions. Methods: 200 effusions (80 tumor cell‐positive, 74 negative and 46 cytologically equivocal) were stained with DAPI‐SR for DNA‐flow‐ and with Feulgen‐Pararosaniline for ‐image‐cytometry. They were measured using a PAS‐flow‐cytometer and an AutoCyte‐QUIC‐DNA‐workstation according to the ESACP consensus reports for DNA‐flow‐ and ‐image‐cytometry, respectively [7,23,29,49]. Results: Sensitivity of DNA‐aneuploidy for the identification of malignant cells was 32.1% for DNA‐flow‐ and 75.0% for ‐image‐cytometry, specificity of ‐euploidy in benign cells was 100.0% for both methods. Positive predictive value of DNA‐aneuploidy for the identification of malignant cells was 100.0% for both techniques, negative predictive value of DNA‐euploidy was 48.6% for DNA‐flow‐ and 72.0% for ‐image‐cytometry. Conclusions: Searching for DNA‐aneuploidy as a diagnostic marker for neoplastic cells in serous effusions image‐cytometry revealed superior sensitivity as compared with monoparametric flow cytometry.

Keywords: DNA‐flow‐cytometry, DNA‐image‐cytometry, serous effusion, cytopathology


Articles from Analytical Cellular Pathology : the Journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES