Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences logoLink to Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
. 2015 Sep;18(9):856–861.

Down-regulation of miR-135b in colon adenocarcinoma induced by a TGF-β receptor I kinase inhibitor (SD-208)

Abolfazl Akbari 1, Mohammad Hossein Ghahremani 2, Gholam Reza Mobini 3, Mahdi Abastabar 4, Javad Akhtari 5, Manzar Bolhassani 6, Mansour Heidari 6,7,*
PMCID: PMC4620183  PMID: 26523217

Abstract

Objective(s):

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is involved in colorectal cancer (CRC). The SD-208 acts as an anti-cancer agent in different malignancies via TGF-β signaling. This work aims to show the effect of manipulation of TGF-β signaling on some miRNAs implicated in CRC.

Materials and Methods:

We investigated the effects of SD-208 on SW-48, a colon adenocarcinoma cell line. The cell line was treated with 0.5, 1 and 2 μM concentrations of SD-208. Then, the xenograft model of colon cancer was established by subcutaneous inoculation of SW-48 cell line into the nude mice. The animals were treated with SD-208 for three weeks. A quantitative real-time PCR was carried out for expression level analysis of selected oncogenic (miR-21, 31, 20a and 135b) and suppressor-miRNAs (let7-g, miR-133b, 145 and 200c). Data were analyzed using the 2-∆∆CT method through student’s t-test via the GraphPad Prism software.

Results:

Our results revealed that SD-208 could significantly down-regulate the expression of one key onco-miRNA, miR-135b, in either SW-48 colon cells (P=0.006) or tumors orthotopically implanted in nude mice (P=0.018). Our in silico study also predicted that SD-208 could modulate the expression of potential downstream tumor suppressor targets of the miR135b.

Conclusion:

Our data provide novel evidence that anticancer effects of SD-208 (and likely other TGF-β inhibitors) may be owing to their ability to regulate miRNAs expression.

Keywords: Colon cancer, Oncogenic and suppressor, micro RNAs (miRNAs), SD-208, TGF-β receptor 1 (TGβRI), kinase inhibitor

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer related death worldwide, making it a fine and attractive area for oncologists to study (1, 2). In numerous cancers including CRC, it has been documented that aberration of the growth factor signaling pathways specifically transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathway play a vital role in tumor initiation, progression and metastasis (3-7). Therefore, it has become a proper target for cancer therapy (8-13). It is has been accepted that a major growth factor such as TGF-β, which has a wide range of effects on key physiological events, must be under extended regulation to control its expression and function. This regulation should include mechanisms that allow a variety of effects depending on special cellular and tissue contexts (14-16).

Recently, a new layer of cellular mechanisms as microRNA (miRNA)-mediated gene expression has been identified that is implicated in the post transcriptional negative regulation (17-20). The miRNAs were well-known to interact with signaling pathway components and to involve in multiple cellular processes as well as initiation, progression and metastasis of human cancers (21-25). Increasing evidences have revealed that cancer-associated miRNAs can function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors (18, 20). The miRNAs-mediated regulation networks can strictly influence the growth factors signaling pathways (24, 25). There are several studies showing relationship of TGF-β with diverse microRNAs (26-29). In addition, it has been shown that basic cell signaling pathways adjust the activity of the related components in miRNAs biogenesis pathway to achieve a fine miRNAs expression pattern (28).

Recent emerging evidence suggests manipulation of growth factors signaling by special inhibitors can alter miRNAs expression in cancer cells in vivo and in vitro (30-35). Several strategies based on either restoration of silenced miRNAs or inhibition of overexpressed miRNAs has opened a new area of research in cancer therapy including CRC. It has been proposed that restoration of normal equilibrium for cancer-related miRNAs can inhibit colon tumor progression (36, 37). On the other hand, several reports imply that targeting of TGF-β signaling pathway at late stages of carcinogenesis could be a helpful tool for treatment of human cancers such as CRC, glioblastoma and breast cancer (4, 8). These studies show that a series of TGβRI kinase inhibitors such as SD-208 could be influential in treatment of a range of cancers (12). Our aim was to investigate the miRNAs (oncogene or tumor suppressor), whose expression might be altered due to inhibition of TGF-β signaling pathway.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and treatment with SD-208

SW-48 cell line, a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line (Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran) was grown in 25 cm2 flask (SPL Life Sciences; South Korea) containing RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Germany) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco; Germany) and 100 units/ml penicillin (Gibco; Germany). Drug treatment and cell viability assay were performed as previously explained (6). Briefly, the cells were trypsinized in exponential growth phase and were seeded in 6-well flat-bottom plates (SPL Life Sciences; South Korea) at a density of 5×105 cells/well (2000 μl media/well). 48 hr after treatment with 0.5, 1 and 2 µM concentrations of SD-208, the cells were harvested for total RNA extraction.

Animal model implanted with adenocarcinoma cell line (SW-48) and treatment protocol

The protocol for establishing the xenograft model of colon cancer was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Ethical Code Number; ERC/S/277) as previously described (6). 6-week-old female athymic C56BL/6 nude mice (n= 8 per group) were obtained from Omid Institute for Advanced Biomodels (Tehran, Iran). After cell inoculation, xenograft tumors were allowed to achieve a size of 80 mm3. Then, the animals were randomly divided into two groups of 8 to receive either SD-208 (50 mg/kg/d) or vehicle (DMSO-containing deionized water) orally for three weeks. Obtained tumors after isolating from animals, were fixed in formalin or frozen for histological staining and RNA extraction, respectively.

Histopathological diagnosis of colon tumors

To confirm colon adenocarcinoma, tumor tissues tissues were excised and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (Dako, Denmark) as previously described (6).

Total RNA extraction from cultured and tumor tissues

Either SW-48 cells or tumor tissues at the mentioned time points after treatment with SD-208, were subjected for total RNA extraction using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted total RNA was stored at -80 °C until use.

miRNA expression analysis by reverse-transcription (RT) real-time PCR

Four miRNAs as potential onco-miRs (miR-21, 31, 20a, 135b) and four miRNAs as potential suppressor-miRs (let7-g, miR-133b, 145, 200c) involved in colon cancer, were selected from the Sanger Center miRNA Registry at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Rfam/mirna/index.shtml. MicroRNA expression was analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR) using the SYBR Green method (Parsgenom, Iran). After polyadenylation of total RNA and cDNA synthesis, miRNAs were expanded by the specific primers for mature forms according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was performed on a Bio Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR System. RNU6B was used as an endogenous (internal) control, and the data were normalized compared to this housekeeping gene. All reactions were performed in triplicate and the absence of contamination was verified using non-template controls. PCR products also were visualized by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using the 2-∆∆cCT method. The standard error of means was computed and analysis of variance (ANOVA, Tukey’s post tests) completed via GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences between data sets.

Results

SD-208 toxicity effects

To assess the potential toxicity effects of SD-208, the expression levels of miRNAs was examined by real time RT-PCR (Table 1). Then the appropriate numbers of SW-48 cells were injected into 8 mice to develop tumors. Following SD-208 treatment period, we could not observe any changes in animal behavior, body weight or lifespan compared to controls. Also all mice with an observed tumor growth survived with a balanced diet. These data suggest that SD-208 lacks toxic effects on animals (data not shown).

Table 1.

miRNAs differentially expressed in SW-48 cells after 48 hr treatment with SD-208

miRNA Fold change P-value
miR-21 -0.923 0.401
miR-31 -0.938 0.467
miR-20a -0.918 0.249
miR-135b -0.519 0.006**
let7-g +1.1 0.099
miR-133b +1.07 0.163
miR-145 +1.09 0.15
miR-200c +1.12 0.135

Colon adenocarcinoma confirmation

The H&E staining confirmed marked cellularity with significant hyperchromatism and pleomorphism (Figure 1). The pattern of adenocarcinoma was alike to the human origin (Figure 1 A, B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative results of orthotopic colon tumor in nude mice and pathological confirmation. Nude mice bearing developed SW-48 tumors were divided into two groups: SD-208 treatment (A) and vehicle (B). Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumor tissues confirmed colon adenocarcinoma in both treated (A) and non-treated (B) tumor-bearing mice. The staining demonstrates marked cellularity with profound hyperchromatism and pleomorphism (arrows) and low differentiated tumor cells similar to human colon cancer

Expression pattern of selected onco/suppressor miRNAs in colon adenocarcinoma SW-48 cell line

Real-time PCR analysis detected differentially expression of all selected miRNAs in SW-48 cell line (Table 2). Among the studied miRNAs, miRNA-135b and let7-g expressed at the highest and lowest levels, respectively (Figure 2).

Table 2.

miRNAs differentially expressed in SW-48-derived tumors after treatment with SD-208

miRNA Fold change P-value
miR-21 -0.923 0.401
miR-31 -0.938 0.467
miR-20a -0.918 0.249
miR-135b -0.519 0.006**
let7-g +1.1 0.099
miR-133b +1.07 0.163
miR-145 +1.09 0.15
miR-200c +1.12 0.135

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Electrophoresis of miRNAs genes pattern expressed in SW-48 cell line. As shown, all selected onco/suppressor miRNAs express differentially in SW-48 cell line

Alteration of the miRNAs expression resulted by SD-208 treatment

Evaluation of miRNAs expression by q-PCR showed that the expression of miR-135b significantly down-regulated after treatment by SD-208 (P=0.006, Figure 3A). In the tumors treated with SD-208, miR-135b expression also was down-regulated significantly (P=0.018), compared to control tumors (Figure 3B). Our results showed that all the treated tumors express a lower number of miR-135b, but not other miRNAs, compared to the control tumors. However, there was no change in cell proliferation or tumor size (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Modulation of miR-135b expression caused by SD-208 treatment. The expression of miR-135b significantly was down-regulated either in cell culture (A) or developed tumors (B) in SD-208 groups compared to controls

Prediction of the target genes of miR-135b using bioinformatics analysis

In order to determine the biological function of the down-regulated miRNA, miR-135b, we further predicted the putative downstream targets of this miRNA. We focused our attention on miR-135b because it was the only miRNA affected by SD-208 either in vitro or in vivo. In silico analysis using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/) showed that miR-135b potentially targets transcripts encoding known tumor-suppressor factors, such as APC (adenomatosis polyposis coli), FOXO1 (forkhead transcription box1), RUNX1 (runt-related transcription factor 1) and ESRRA (estrogen-related receptor alpha).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the effect of a TGF-β receptor kinase inhibitor, SD-208, on some potential onco/suppressor-miRNAs expression in CRC. SD-208 is a TGF-β signaling pathway inhibitor that could exert anticancer effects on several tumor cells by reduction of growth rate or modification of other cell functions (6, 9, 12). Some investigators revealed SD-208 reduces tumor growth and metastasis in different cancers (9, 12), whereas, others showed this agent regulates the growth of tumors without changes in proliferation, apoptosis or angiogenesis and cannot reduce proliferation of cells (8). Another study reported that SD-093 (as an SD-208 analog) failed to alter morphology and growth rate of pancreatic carcinoma cells (38). Also it has been reported that SD-208 has no effect on the growth of primary and metastatic R3T mammary tumors in athymic nude mice (9). These findings indicate that anti-cancer effect of SD-208 may be not due to suppression of cell growth and proliferation (36). Since efficacy of this inhibitor is a controversial issue in cancer treatment, we hypothesized the unknown mechanism(s) including alteration of cancer-related miRNAs might be involved.

Several chemopreventive agents have been shown to modulate the expression of numerous miRNAs in cancer cells that lead to sensitization of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents (39, 40), suggesting the potential of miRNAs as targets for anti-cancer drugs (18, 20). Hence, evaluation of the possible effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on the expression profile of miRNAs may have an important outcome for cancer therapy strategies (21, 33).

Although a number of studies have shown that chemotherapy drugs alter miRNAs expression in many cancer cells, there is no report on the effect of TGF-β receptor kinase inhibitors on miRNAs in human CRC. We selected some miRNAs that have already been confirmed to function as onco-miR (miR-21, miR-31, miR-20a, and miR-135b) or suppressor miR (miR-133b, miR-145, miR-200 and let7-g) in CRC (36-39). The present study focused on the alteration of these miRNAs in colon cancer treated by SD-208.

Expression analysis of miRNAs by a q-PCR revealed that expression of miR-135b significantly down-regulated after in vitro treatment with SD-208 (P=0.006). In the tumor tissues treated with SD-208, miR-135b expression significantly down-regulated, also. The results showed that all the treated tumors significantly expressed a lower number of miR-135b, but not other oncogenic-miRNAs, compared to controls (P=0.018). However, there was no change in cell proliferation or tumor size.

Interestingly, the miR-135b has been documented as a tumor promoting factor and to play a role in migration and metastasis in different cancers as well as CRC (37-39). In order to address the question of how can the possible molecular mechanisms of the miR-135b on CRC cell signaling pathways be defined, we performed an in-silico study. In silico analysis using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/) showed that miR-135b potentially targets key tumor-suppressor genes involved in CRC: APC and FOXO1. APC and FOXO1 genes have also been validated as targets of miR-135b using luciferase reporter assay (41), hence, we would like to discuss these genes whose functions could potentially affect the cell signaling in CRC.

APC gene acts a tumor suppressor the inactivation of which is the key initiating event in colorectal carcinogenesis (42). Recently, one study demonstrated that up-regulation of miR-135b in CRC is associated with low APC mRNA levels (42). In the present study, we advocate a novel molecular mechanism: a kinase inhibitor molecule can reduce miR-135b expression, by which APC activation could be mediated.

Moreover, it has been reported that miR-135b affects FOXO1 as an endogenous target and suppresses protein expression. Several lines of evidence indicate that FOXO transcription factors might play an important role in tumor development (41, 43). On the other hand, FOXO1 alteration by miR-135b can affect sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs, such that tumor cells overexpressing miR-135b were more resistant to specific anticancer drugs. These results suggest the possibility that miR-135b may confer chemoresistance to tumor cells through FOXO1 modulation (41). Therefore, it is rational to hypothesize that the properties of anti-cancer drugs may be related to their alteration of miRNA profiles (43, 44). For example, suppression of miR-21 has been shown to sensitize MCF-7 cells to topotecan (44). As well, 5-FU was reported to be able to modify the expression of several miRNAs in human colon cancer cells (44). Similar studies exist for the drugs gemcitabine, doxorubicin and tamoxifen (38).

Overall, we primarily predicted that combination of SD-208 and one anticancer drug such as 5-FU, may show stronger inhibition of colon tumor cell growth by modification of onco-miRs. Additionally, as a novel approach in CRC therapy, pre-treatment by SD-208 could improve chemosensitivity in resistant cancerous cells. However, the mechanism by which these agents alter miRNA expression may be dependent on genomic context.

Conclusion

The receptor kinase inhibitor SD-208 may partially inhibit colon tumorigenesis as well as chemoresistance by alteration of miRNAs. Hence, the TGβRI kinase inhibitor-based treatment may possibly uphold chemosensitivity in resistant colon cancer cells.

Acknowledgment

The results reported in this paper were part of a student thesis. The authors wish to thank the School of Advanced Medical Technologies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, for supporting this study (grant no. 18087). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Finally, we thank Fatemeh Rafiei for key advice and coordinating devices.

Footnotes

Conflict of interests

The authors declare they have no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Cancer Facts and Figures 2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Societ; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ma J, Gao HM, Hua X, Lu ZY, Gao HC. Role of TGF-β1 in human colorectal cancer and effects after cantharidinate intervention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:4045–4048. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.9.4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Colorectal tumor, the genetic basis of human cancer. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002. pp. 583–612. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bierie B, Moses HL. TGF-β and cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jean-Jacques L. The dual role of TGF in human cancer: from tumor suppression to cancer metastasis. ISRN Mol Biol. 2012;7:1–28. doi: 10.5402/2012/381428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akbari A, Amanpour S, Muhammadnejad S, Ghahremani MH, Gaffari SH, Dehpour AR, et al. Evaluation of antitumor activity of a TGF-beta receptor I inhibitor (SD-208) on human colon adenocarcinoma. Daru J Pharm Sci. 2014;22:47–54. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yingling JM, Blanchard KL, Sawyer JS. Development of TGF-β signaling inhibitors for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:1011–1022. doi: 10.1038/nrd1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Uhl M, Steffen A, Jörg W, Markus W, Jing Ying Ma, Ramona A, et al. SD-208, a novel transforming growth factor-β receptor I kinase inhibitor, inhibits growth and invasiveness and enhances immunogenicity of murine and human glioma cells in fadtro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7954–7961. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leung SY, Niimi A, Noble A, Oates T, Williams AS, Medicherla S, et al. Effect of transforming growth factor-beta receptor I kinase inhibitor 2,4-disubstituted pteridine (SD-208) in chronic allergic airway inflammation and remodeling. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319:586–594. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.109314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ge R, Rajeev V, Ray P, Lattime E, Rittling S, Medicherla S, et al. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of mouse mammary carcinoma by selective inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor kinase in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4315–4330. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Suzuki E, Kim S, Cheung HK, Corbley MJ, Zhang X, Sun L, et al. A novel small-molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor β type I receptor kinase (SM16) inhibits murine mesothelioma tumor growth in vivo and prevents tumor recurrence after surgical resection. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2351–2359. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khalid SM, Delphine J, Pierrick GJ, Maria N, Ryan M, Xiang HP, et al. TGF-β -RI Kinase inhibitor SD-208 reduces the development and progression of melanoma bone metastases. Cancer Res. 2011;71:175–184. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Levy L, Hill CS. Alterations in components of the TGF-β superfamily signaling pathways in human cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:41–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Luo K, Lodish HF. Signaling by chimeric erythropoietin-TGF-β receptors: homodimerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the type I TGF-β receptor and heterodimerization with the type II receptor are both required for intracellular signal transduction. EMBO J. 1996;15:4485–4496. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Subramanian G, Roderich E, Schwarz Linda H, Glenn M, Sarvajit C, Sundeep D, et al. Targeting endogenous transforming growth factor-β receptor signaling in SMAD4-deficient human pancreatic carcinoma cells inhibits their invasive phenotype1. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5200–5211. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Medicherla S, Li L, Ma JY, Kapoun AM, Gaspar NJ, Liu YW, et al. Antitumor Activity of TGF-β Inhibitor is Dependent on the Microenvironment. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:4149–4158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schanen BC, Li X. Transcriptional regulation of mammalian miRNA genes. Genomics. 2011;97:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jingjing L, Zhaolei Z. miRNA regulatory variation in human evolution. Review Article. Trends Genet. 2013;29:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wan G, Mathur R, Hu X, Zhang X, Lu X. miRNA response to DNA damage. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36:478–484. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jeanne A, Loïc de P, Alexandra HC. miRNA, Development and Disease. Advances in Genetics. 2012;80(Chapter 1):1–36. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404742-6.00001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang NQ, Zhang J, Tang QY, Guo JM, Wang GM. miRNA-1297. induces cell proliferation by targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog in testicular germ cell tumor cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:6243–6246. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ni Y, Bin W, Zi-Fang Q, Hai-Bo P, Man-Li Z, Qi-Gui Y. The research progress of the interactions between miRNA and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in breast cancer of human and mice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:1075–1079. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.3.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matthew TB, Akiko H. Regulation of miRNA biogenesis as an integrated component of growth factor signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruibin Z, Lijuan Q, Li J. miRNA-dependent cross-talk between VEGF and Ang-2 in hypoxia-induced microvascular dysfunction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;23:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ping L, Xiao-Bing X, Qian C, Guo-Lian P, Wan L, Jian-Cheng T, et al. MiRNA-15a mediates cell cycle arrest and potentiates apoptosis in breast cancer cells by targeting synuclein-γ. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:6949–6954. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.16.6949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pei-Yu C, Lingfeng Q, Carmen B, Klaus C, Tai Y, Xinbo Z, et al. FGF regulates TGF-β signaling and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via control of let-7. miRNA expression. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1684–1696. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tan JY, Marques AC. The miRNA-Mediated Cross-Talk between Transcripts Provides a Novel Layer of Posttranscriptional Regulation. Adv Genet. 2014;85(Chapter 3):149–199. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800271-1.00003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Molly H. Computational methods to identify miRNA targets. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:738–744. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhiwei W, Yiwei Li, Dejuan K, Aamir A, Sanjeev B, Fazlul H Sarkar. Cross-talk between miRNA and Notch signaling pathways in tumor development and progression. Cancer Lett. 2010;292:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tsuchiya A, Kanno T, Nishizaki T. Adenosine exerts potent anticancer effects through diverse signaling pathways. Personalized Medicine Universe. 2014;3:35–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Floriane P, Anaïs L, Miran K, Jack RW, Claude Caron de F, Philippe M. Wnt signaling and hepatocarcinogenesis. Molecular targets for the development of innovative anticancer drugs. J Hepatol. 2013;59:1107–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alberto I. MiRNA changes in chemical carcinogenesis and prevention by chemopreventive agents. Toxicol Lett. 2012;211:29–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang S, Sun WY, Wu JJ, Wei W. TGF-β signaling pathway as a pharmacological target in liver diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2014;85:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sotaro K, Kousuke T, Yutaka S, Sumio S. Screening for possible miRNA–mRNA associations in a colon cancer cell line. Gene. 2014;533:520–531. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Luo X, Burwinke B, Tao S, Brenner H. MicroRNA Signatures: Novel Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1272–1286. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.James FR, Viktorija S, Eugenio Z. miRNA Profiling in Colorectal Cancer Highlights miR-1 Involvement. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10:504–515. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma Y, Zhang P, Yang J, Liu Z, Yang Z, Qin H. Candidate microRNA biomarkers in human colorectal cancer: systematic review profiling studies and experimental validation. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:2077–2087. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tang B, He WL, Zheng C, Cheang TY, Zhang XF, Wu H, et al. Marine fungal metabolite 1386A alters the microRNA profile in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2011;23:610–618. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhou J, Zhou Y, Yin B, Hao W, Zhao L, Ju W, et al. 5-Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin modify the expression profiles of microRNAs in human colon cancer cells in vitro. Oncol Rep. 2010;23:121–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nirav RS, Hexin C. MicroRNAs in pathogenesis of breast cancer: Implications in diagnosis and treatment. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:48–60. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hironori M, Hiroshi IS, Hikaru N, Masaaki N, Takashi Y, Norio K, et al. miR-135b mediates NPM-ALK–driven oncogenicity and renders IL-17–producing immunophenotype to anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Blood. 2011;118:12–18. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-354654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nagel R, le Sage C, Diosdado B, van der Waal M, Oude Vrielink JA, Bolijn A, et al. Regulation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene by the miR-135 family in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5795–5802. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fei G, Jin-lu M, Mawen-ze S, Li-ping S, Ying G. The potential clinical applications and prospects of microRNAs in lung cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2014;7:901–906. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S62227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhu Z, Wang CP, Zhang YF, Nie L. MicroRNA-100 resensitizes resistant chondrosarcoma cells to cisplatin through direct targeting of mTOR. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:917–923. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.2.917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES