Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 Apr 1;90(7):2920–2924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2920

Experimental resolution of the free energies of aqueous solvation contributions to ligand-protein binding: quinone-QA site interactions in the photosynthetic reaction center protein.

K Warncke 1, P L Dutton 1
PMCID: PMC46208  PMID: 8464908

Abstract

Equilibrium binding free energies of 14 benzo-, naphtho-, and anthraquinone cofactors have been determined at the QA redox catalytic site of the purified photosynthetic reaction center protein from Rhodobacter sphaeroides solubilized in water (delta G degrees B,w), in hexane solution containing 30 mM water (delta G degrees B,hh), and after partial dehydration (delta G degrees B,dh) with magnesium sulfate. Our aim is to resolve the contributions of aqueous bulk phase solvation and protein hydration contributions to binding in order to characterize in detail the direct interactions between the ligands and protein at the QA site. This is accomplished by comparing the differences between delta G degrees B,w and delta G degrees B,hh (or delta G degrees B,dh) with the water to hexane solvent transfer free energies of the quinones (delta G degrees tr,Q). Values of delta G degrees tr,Q are determined separately in binary solution and range from 0.65 to -5.69 kcal/mol (1 cal = 4.184 J). The results are interpreted in terms of a thermodynamic cycle that links the species involved in the binding and solvent transfer equilibria. Values of delta G degrees B,hh -delta G degrees B,w are linearly correlated with -delta G degrees tr,Q (slope, 0.78 +/- 0.04; ordinate intercept, -0.13 +/- 0.12 kcal/mol). The deviation of the experimental slopes from the predicted value of unity is attributed in part to a systematic decrease of quinone thermodynamic activity in the aqueous binding medium relative to the aqueous phase in the binary partitioning solvent system. The difference between the quinone-QA site binding free energies measured in hydrated hexane and water is therefore related only to the difference in bulk phase quinone solvation, as given by 0.78 delta G degrees tr,Q. The linear relation obtained using delta G degrees B,dh -delta G degrees B,w has the same slope, but the intercept is decreased to -1.48 +/- 0.19 kcal/mol, indicating that quinone binding strengths in the hexane system are uniformly enhanced after partial dehydration. This suggests that the quinones encounter a common opposition to interaction with the site in the hydrated, relative to the partially dehydrated, state. The further utility of the method to directly assess ligand-site binding free energies is demonstrated with examples that address the contributions of molecular size and dipolar or hydrogen bond interactions to the binding of quinones at the QA site.

Full text

PDF
2920

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen J. P., Feher G., Yeates T. O., Komiya H., Rees D. C. Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(16):5730–5734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolin J. T., Filman D. J., Matthews D. A., Hamlin R. C., Kraut J. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase refined at 1.7 A resolution. I. General features and binding of methotrexate. J Biol Chem. 1982 Nov 25;257(22):13650–13662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang C. H., Tiede D., Tang J., Smith U., Norris J., Schiffer M. Structure of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 reaction center. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 1;205(1):82–86. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80870-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clayton R. K. Effects of dehydration on reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Nov 9;504(2):255–264. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(78)90174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fersht A. R. Relationships between apparent binding energies measured in site-directed mutagenesis experiments and energetics of binding and catalysis. Biochemistry. 1988 Mar 8;27(5):1577–1580. doi: 10.1021/bi00405a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fersht A. R., Shi J. P., Knill-Jones J., Lowe D. M., Wilkinson A. J., Blow D. M., Brick P., Carter P., Waye M. M., Winter G. Hydrogen bonding and biological specificity analysed by protein engineering. Nature. 1985 Mar 21;314(6008):235–238. doi: 10.1038/314235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Filman D. J., Bolin J. T., Matthews D. A., Kraut J. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase refined at 1.7 A resolution. II. Environment of bound NADPH and implications for catalysis. J Biol Chem. 1982 Nov 25;257(22):13663–13672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frauenfelder H., Gratton E. Protein dynamics and hydration. Methods Enzymol. 1986;127:207–216. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)27017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jencks W. P. Binding energy, specificity, and enzymic catalysis: the circe effect. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1975;43:219–410. doi: 10.1002/9780470122884.ch4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KAUZMANN W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60608-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Okamura M. Y., Isaacson R. A., Feher G. Primary acceptor in bacterial photosynthesis: obligatory role of ubiquinone in photoactive reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3491–3495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Page M. I., Jencks W. P. Entropic contributions to rate accelerations in enzymic and intramolecular reactions and the chelate effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1678–1683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parak F. Correlation of protein dynamics with water mobility: Mössbauer spectroscopy and microwave absorption methods. Methods Enzymol. 1986;127:196–206. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)27016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poulos T. L., Finzel B. C., Howard A. J. Crystal structure of substrate-free Pseudomonas putida cytochrome P-450. Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 9;25(18):5314–5322. doi: 10.1021/bi00366a049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Poulos T. L., Howard A. J. Crystal structures of metyrapone- and phenylimidazole-inhibited complexes of cytochrome P-450cam. Biochemistry. 1987 Dec 15;26(25):8165–8174. doi: 10.1021/bi00399a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Quiocho F. A., Wilson D. K., Vyas N. K. Substrate specificity and affinity of a protein modulated by bound water molecules. Nature. 1989 Aug 3;340(6232):404–407. doi: 10.1038/340404a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schönfeld M., Montal M., Feher G. Reaction center--phospholipid complex in organic solvents: formation and properties. Biochemistry. 1980 Apr 15;19(8):1535–1542. doi: 10.1021/bi00549a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Friedman R., Honig B. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 8;30(40):9686–9697. doi: 10.1021/bi00104a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Warshel A., Aqvist J., Creighton S. Enzymes work by solvation substitution rather than by desolvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(15):5820–5824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Woodbury N. W., Parson W. W., Gunner M. R., Prince R. C., Dutton P. L. Radical-pair energetics and decay mechanisms in reaction centers containing anthraquinones, naphthoquinones or benzoquinones in place of ubiquinone. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Aug 13;851(1):6–22. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(86)90243-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES