Abstract
Microtubules - which define the shape of axons, cilia and flagella, and provide tracks for intracellular transport - can be highly bent by intracellular forces, and microtubule structure and stiffness are thought to be affected by physical constraints. Yet how microtubules tolerate the vast forces exerted on them remains unknown. Here, by using a microfluidic device, we show that microtubule stiffness decreases incrementally with each cycle of bending and release. Similar to other cases of material fatigue, the concentration of mechanical stresses on pre-existing defects in the microtubule lattice is responsible for the generation of larger damages, which further decrease microtubule stiffness. Strikingly, damaged microtubules were able to incorporate new tubulin dimers into their lattice and recover their initial stiffness. Our findings demonstrate that microtubules are ductile materials with self-healing properties, that their dynamics does not exclusively occur at their ends, and that their lattice plasticity enables the microtubules' adaptation to mechanical stresses.
Microtubules are dynamic polymers that span the intracellular space. The self-organization of microtubule arrays defines the shape of axons, cilia, flagella, centrioles as well as the structure of mitotic spindles and of intracellular transport networks 1. Therefore the growth dynamics and mechanical properties of microtubules, which determine network architecture, are central to cell physiology. The dynamics of microtubule growth has been exhaustively investigated and is now fairly well described 2,3 compared to microtubules mechanical properties, which are poorly understood despite their critical role in the regulation of microtubule network geometry 4–7.
The large and hollow cross-section of a microtubule’s tubular shape confers it a high bending stiffness 8. Microtubule persistence length - of a few millimeters - surpasses by several orders of magnitude the stiffness of other cytoskeleton polymers 7,9. The regular lattice of adjacent protofilaments has been an inspiring structure and the subject of various physical models of microtubule mechanics. Cracks, defects and holes in the lattice, as well as breathing or sliding of adjacent protofilaments have all been proposed to modulate microtubule mechanical properties 8,10–17. In vivo, microtubules are submitted to various types of external forces; produced by fluid flow in the case of cilia and flagella, or by molecular motors and deformation of other cytoskeleton networks in the cytoplasm 18–24. Microtubules can move, bend or break in response to those constraints 25,26. Yet, it is currently not known how microtubules respond to the vast forces exerted on them and if cracks and defects actually modulate this response.
Optical tweezers and fluid flow have been used to bend microtubules and estimate microtubule stiffness 7,27. They revealed key microtubule features such as stiffness length dependency and the softening effect of microtubule stabilizing drugs 28,29. However, investigations into the mechanical properties of dynamic microtubules in response to external forces critically need a new method that does not sacrifice throughput for accuracy and is compatible with high quality imaging. Here we developed a device that can be used to apply controlled hydrodynamic constraints on arrays of dynamic microtubules and monitor their deformation.
Microtubules soften under mechanical stress
To study the effect of mechanical stress on microtubules, we attached microtubule seeds onto micropatterns30, grew dynamic microtubules and applied a calibrated (and locally quantifiable) flow orthogonal to the microtubule axis using microfluidics (Fig. 1A). When subjected to a transient hydrodynamic flow, microtubules bent and recovered their original straight shape with no apparent hysteresis (i.e. microtubules demonstrated elastic deformation, Supplementary video S1 and Fig. 1B). Surprisingly, repeated bending cycles using identical flow revealed that microtubules bent further with each cycle. The maximal deflection increased incrementally with each mechanical cycle (Supplementary video S2, Fig. 2A and 2B) suggesting that microtubules became softer –i.e. exhibited material fatigue– under repeated mechanical stress. Microtubule persistence length, a direct correlate of microtubule stiffness, can be inferred from the microtubule shape and the velocity of the fluid exerting the hydrodynamic force on the microtubule 29 (see Methods). While the initial persistence length varied from 2 to 4 mm, the majority of microtubules (60%, n=15), which were assembled in the presence of 20 μM of tubulin, displayed a progressive reduction of stiffness cycle after cycle (Fig. 2C). On average, those microtubules became twice as soft as their initial state after 6 bending cycles.
Lattice defects promote microtubule softening
Material fatigue of highly ordered polymers and crystal-like structures is known to stem from pre-existing structural defects that concentrate stresses and spread into larger damages31. Pre-existing structural defects in the microtubules lattice, such as lack of dimers, abrupt variations of protofilament number, or of helix start number have been reported32,33. By altering the regularity of the lattice, defects introduce areas of weakness that concentrate stresses and undergo local protofilament disorganization and partial lattice disassembly. We use the term “defect” to refer to initial lattice imperfections and the term “damage” to refer to the lattice disorganization and destruction that results from stress accumulation on defects. Defects in the microtubule lattice have already been proposed to alter mechanical properties but this hypothesis remains untested 8,11,13,14. Consistently, rapidly polymerized microtubules harbour a greater frequency of defects and tend to display lower stiffness32,34. We confirmed that rapidly assembled microtubules are softer than slowly assembled microtubules (Fig. 2D). To test whether the amount of pre-existing defects is responsible for microtubule softening through the generation of larger damages, we subjected microtubules assembled at various speeds to repeated bending cycles. It appeared that the magnitude of microtubule fatigue in response to cyclic stress was indeed larger in rapidly assembled microtubules (Fig. 2E). All microtubules assembled at the highest tested concentration of free tubulin (26 μM) displayed material fatigue whereas softening was undetectable for microtubules assembled at the lowest concentration (14 μM) (Fig. 2F, Supplementary Fig. S1). These results demonstrate that the stress alone is not sufficient to fatigue microtubules and they suggest that pre-existing lattice defects may be responsible for this mechanical property. Of note, highly curved microtubules in cells have long puzzled investigators considering the intrinsic stiffness of pure microtubules. While microtubule curvature in cells may result from the large forces exerted by actin network contraction35, the microtubule fatigue we describe here suggests that repeated mechanical constraints may soften microtubules in cells.
Softened microtubules can self-repair
Some structures made of long-lived microtubules in sensory organelles, such as sensory cilia or axons, maintain their mechanical properties despite being continuously subjected to external constraints24,36. This raises the possibility that mechanisms may protect long-lived microtubules from material fatigue or allow them to recover from the effect of injurious bending. We tested this hypothesis by letting microtubules recover for long periods of time between the bending cycles (Fig. 3A). Microtubules were assembled at 20 μM of free tubulin. As the duration of the rest period increased from 10 to 100 s, the proportion of microtubules affected by fatigue was progressively reduced (Supplementary Fig. S2). Remarkably, when microtubules remained at rest for 100 s between the bending cycles, microtubule stiffness was unchanged from one cycle to another (Fig. 3B-C). Since microtubules were subjected to the same bending forces in all recovery experiments, the absence of softening when resting time is increased to 100 s suggests that microtubules underwent repair in between the bending cycles. To further test whether microtubules recover their mechanical properties after being damaged, we induce softening with five rapid bending cycles and followed by a 100 s rest (Figure 3d). The majority of microtubules that had softened during the five bending cycles displayed a significant stiffness increase during the rest period. Meanwhile, for most of the microtubules that did not soften, stiffness did not increase during the rest period. These findings demonstrate that damaged microtubules have the ability to recover their stiffness through self-repair.
Microtubules have self-healing properties
We propose two hypotheses for the recovery of mechanical properties during the pauses: 1- incorporation of new tubulin to patch damages in the lattice and 2- lateral realignment of protofilaments that underwent sliding or separation. In the former hypothesis, stiffness recovery should involve the incorporation of new dimers in the lattice. To test the possibility that tubulin incorporation can actually heal microtubules, we generated large, but locally and temporally controlled, structural damages to microtubules with laser pulses (Supplementary video S3 and Supplementary Fig. S4). To visualize possible tubulin incorporation into the microtubule lattice, red microtubules were bathed in a solution of green tubulin and damaged by laser pulses. Upon switching the solution back to red tubulin, it was apparent that the green tubulin had become incorporated not only at the end but also at the impact site on the red microtubule (Supplementary video S4 and Fig. 4A). This suggests that microtubule lattice repair can take place and be directly visualized in the case of large damages.
Incorporation of tubulin along the microtubule length has previously been hypothesized37. Stabilized, end-to-end annealed axonemes were shown to adopt curved shapes upon removal of free tubulin dimers in solution and to resume their original straight shapes upon dimer addition. This suggested that microtubule shape recovery depended on intra-lattice dimer incorporation37. To test whether bent microtubules heal by local incorporation of tubulin at areas of high stress, we subjected red-labelled microtubules to five bending cycles with prolonged recovery periods in the presence of green-labelled tubulin (Fig. 4B). Concentrates of green fluorescence were found along the red microtubules (Supplementary video S5 and Fig. 4C and D) in more than 80% (n=24) of microtubules that had been repeatedly bent. Green fluorescence peaks 1.5 to 4 times higher than the adjacent background were found in line scans (Fig. 4E and Supplementary Fig. S5). The appearance of new tubulin along the microtubule length takes place preferentially in the proximal and most curved half of the microtubule (Fig. 4F), thus suggesting that the areas subjected to the greatest local stress underwent damages that were repaired by local tubulin incorporation. Meanwhile, we did not detect any incorporation of green-labelled tubulin into red-labelled microtubules subjected to a longitudinal –rather than orthogonal– flow (Fig. 4G-J, Supplementary video S6, and Supplementary Fig. S6). In addition, slowly assembled microtubules (with 14 μM tubulin) that did not display material fatigue (Fig. 2E) also failed to incorporate new tubulin into their lattice under repeated cycles of bending (Supplementary Fig. S7). Thus free tubulin dimers incorporate systematically along the sidewall of microtubules recovering their stiffness after having been damaged by external forces but they do not incorporate in microtubules in which stiffness is not changing (whether they had been bent or not). Therefore tubulin dimer incorporation along the lattice appears to be a key correlate of microtubule stiffness recovery.
Intriguingly, curvature seems to vary smoothly along the length of the bent microtubule even though the size of the tubulin incorporation area –i.e. the repaired area– is rather limited (green fluorescent sites were 1.2 μm +/− 1 μm long (n=26)). Local damage should intuitively lead to localized kinks rather than homogeneous global deformations. Since we could not measure experimentally the size of the softened regions, which seems to differ from the size of the repair region, we developed a method to estimate it by comparing the experimental deformations we measured to those of numerical microtubules of known stiffness profile. We performed numerical simulations in which softening was limited to defined length segments (Figure 5a and Methods). In our simulations, both the width and the degree of local softening contributed to the deformation and the apparent average stiffness of the entire microtubule (Figure 5b and Supplementary Fig. S8). Then, in order to characterize microtubule deviation from homogeneous deformation, we measured the distance ω between experimentally bent microtubules and numerical microtubules of constant stiffness showing similar deformations (Figure 5c). Large distances corresponded to microtubules showing local kinks whereas low distances corresponded to more homogeneous deformation. We compared experimental values to those of numerically simulated microtubules with various rigidity profiles but similar apparent stiffness (see Methods and Figure 5d). Some experimental data points were close to numerical simulations of microtubule with small soften region (Δs/L = 0.1) but others were closer to simulation of microtubules with long soften region (Δs/L = 0.5). This showed that, in our experiments, the bending induced damages were not always highly localized but often extended over a large portion of the microtubule. Thus, the two working hypotheses we formulated for microtubule repair, ie local structure healing by incorporation of free dimers and lattice rearrangement over long distances, are both compatible with our experimental observations.
Here we report the softening and self-healing of microtubules in response to mechanical constraints. While softening upon repetitive constraints, or fatigue, is common to all materials, self-healing is much less frequent38,39 and appears here as the remarkable natural feature of a biological polymer. Defects in microtubule lattice, such as variations of protofilaments number32,33, are likely to play a central role in microtubule fatigue and self-healing since in the absence of defects microtubules deformed elastically with no fatigue and no repair (Figure 2F and supplementary Figure S7). Exactly how the accumulation of stress at lattice defects alters microtubule architecture and bending stiffness remains a key question. Our data suggest that two processes may operate: 1- a local disassembly spreading from the pre-existing defect (Figure 4) and 2- a long-range disorganization of microtubule lattice (Figure 5). We speculate that structural defects may initiate lattice disorganization by allowing a higher degree of freedom to adjacent protofilaments (Figure 6). Protofilaments adjacent to the defect have fewer lateral interactions and are thus easier to separate making their deformation less constrained (Figure 6ii). This favours the propagation of cracks in the lattice as well as protofilament rupture and disassembly (Figure 6iii). These effects contribute to global and local microtubule softening. They can be further amplified in repeated bending sequences generating microtubule fatigue (Figure 6iii). As the microtubule recover its original straight shape, due to the remaining stiffness of the intact protofilaments, separated protofilaments spontaneously realign and progressively re-establish lateral interactions (Figure 6iv). Meanwhile, free tubulin in the medium binds to the newly generated protofilament ends and completes the healing of the structure (Figure 6iv). Thereby, the microtubule recovers its original stiffness (Figure 6v).
These new properties of microtubule softening and self-repairing and the plasticity of microtubule lattice profoundly change our appreciation of microtubule mechanics and dynamics. It should prompt us to revise our understanding of the regulation of microtubule network architectures.
Methods
Tubulin purification and labeling
Tubulin was purified from fresh bovine brain by three cycles of temperature-dependent assembly and disassembly in Brinkley Buffer 80 (BRB80 buffer; BRB buffer: 80 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM MgCl2 plus 1 mM GTP) 40. MAP-free neurotubulin was purified by cation-exchange chromatography (EMD SO, 650 M, Merck) in 50 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, supplemented with 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA 41. Purified tubulin was obtained after a cycle of polymerization and depolymerization. Fluorescent tubulin (ATTO-488 and ATTO-565-labeled tubulin) and biotinylated tubulin were prepared as previously described 42. Microtubules from neurotubulin were polymerized at 37°C for 30 min and layered onto cushions of 0.1 M NaHEPES, pH 8.6, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 60% v/v glycerol, and sedimented by high centrifugation at 30°C. Then Microtubules were resuspended in 0.1 M NaHEPES, pH 8.6, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 40% v/v glycerol and labeled by adding 1/10 volume 100 mM NHS-ATTO (ATTO Tec), or NHS-Biotin (Pierce) for 10 min at 37°C. The labeling reaction was stopped using 2 volumes of 2X BRB80, containing 100 mM potassium glutamate and 40% v/v glycerol, and then Microtubules were sedimented onto cushions of BRB80 supplemented with 60% glycerol. Microtubules were resuspended in BRB80, and a second cycle of polymerization and depolymerization was performed before use.
Cover glass micropatterning
The micropatterning technique was adapted from Portran et al.30. Cover glasses were cleaned by successive chemical treatments: 30 min in acetone, 15 min in ethanol (96 %), rinsing in ultrapure water, 2 h in Hellmanex III (2 % in water, Hellmanex), and rinsing in ultrapure water. Cover glasses were dried using nitrogen gas flow and incubated for three days in a solution of tri-ethoxy-silane-PEG (30 kDa, PSB-2014, creative PEG works) 1 mg/ml in ethanol 96% and 0.02% of HCl, with gentle agitation at room temperature. Cover glasses were then successively washed in ethanol and ultrapure water, dried with nitrogen gas, and stored at 4°C. Passivated cover glasses were placed into contact with a photomask (Toppan) with a custom-made vacuum-compatible holder and exposed to deep UV (7 mW/cm2 at 184 nm, Jelight) for 2 min 30 s. Deep UV exposure through the transparent micropatterns on the photomask created oxidized micropatterned regions on the PEG coated cover glasses.
Microfluidic circuit fabrication and flow control
The microfluidic device was fabricated in PDMS (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) using standard photolithography and soft lithography 43. The master mold was fabricated by patterning 50 μm thick negative photoresist (SU8 2100, Microchem, MA) by photolitography. A positive replica was fabricated by replica molding PDMS against the master. Prior to molding, the master mold was silanized (trichloro(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl)silane, Sigma) for easier lift-off. Four in-and outlet ports were made in the PDMS device using 0.5 mm soft substrate punches (UniCore 0.5, Ted Pella, Redding, CA). Connectors to support the tubing were made out of PDMS cubes (0.5 cm side length) with a 1.2 mm diameter through hole. The connectors were bonded to the chip ports using still liquid PDMS as glue, which was used to coat the interface between the chip and the connectors, and was then rapidly cured on a hotplate at 120°C. Teflon tubing (Tefzel, inner diameter: 0.03", outer diameter: 1/16", Upchurch Scientific) was inserted into the two ports serving as outlets. Tubing with 0.01" inner and 1/16" outer diameter was used to connect the inlets via two three-way valves (Omnifit labware, Cambridge, UK) that could be opened and closed by hand to a computer-controlled microfluidic pump (MFCS-4C, Fluigent, Villejuif, France). Flow inside the chip was controlled using the MFCS-Flex control software (Fluigent). For repeated bending experiments, a script was used that automatically set the flow to a defined value for 10 s, then turning off the flow for 10 s or 100 s, and then repeating this cycle up to ten times. Custom rubber pieces that fit onto the tubing were used to close the open ends of the outlet tubing when needed.
Microtubule growth on micropatterns
Microtubule seeds were prepared at 10 μM tubulin concentration (30% ATTO-488-labeled or ATTO-565-labeled tubulin and 70 % biotinylated tubulin) in BRB80 supplemented with 0.5 mM GMP-CPP at 37°C for 1 h. The seeds were incubated with 1 μM Taxotere (Sigma) at room temperature for 30 min and were then sedimented by high centrifugation at 30°C and resuspended in BRB80 supplemented with 0.5 mM GMP-CPP and 1 μM Taxotere. Seeds were stored in liquid nitrogen and quickly warmed to 37°C before use.
The PDMS chip was placed on a micropatterned cover glass and fixed on the microscope stage. The chip was perfused with neutravidin (25 μg/ml in BRB80; Pierce), then washed with BRB80, passivated for 20 s with PLL-g-PEG (Pll 20K-G35-PEG2K, Jenkam Technology) at 0.1 mg/ml in 10 mM Hepes (pH = 7.4), and washed again with BRB80. Microtubule seeds were flowed into the chamber at high flow rates perpendicularly to the micropatterned lines to ensure proper orientation of the seeds. Non-attached seeds were washed out immediately using BRB80 supplemented with 1% BSA. Seeds were elongated with a mix containing 14, 18, 20 or 26 μM of tubulin (30% labeled) in BRB80 supplemented with 50 mM NaCl, 50 25 mM NaPi, 1 mM GTP, an oxygen scavenger cocktail (20 mM DTT, 2 mg/ml glucose, 80 μg/ml catalase and 0.67 mg/ml glucose oxidase), 1% BSA, 0.025% methyl cellulose (1500 cp, Sigma) and 0.02% red fluorescent beads (Fluoro-Max polymer spheres, 0.52 μm diameter, Thermo Scientific). The same mix was used to subject microtubules to flow. For the experiments showing tubulin incorporation after bending, a mix was prepared with 100% labeled tubulin for bending the microtubules.
Imaging
Microtubules were visualized using an objective-based azimuthal ilas2 TIRF microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti, modified by Roper Scientific) and an Evolve 512 camera (Photometrics). The microscope stage was kept at 37°C using a warm stage controller (LINKAM MC60). Excitation was achieved using 491 and 561 nm lasers (Optical Insights). Time-lapse recording was performed using Metamorph software (version 7.7.5, Universal Imaging). Movies were processed to improve the signal/noise ratio (smooth and subtract background functions of ImageJ, version 1.47n5). Images were typically taken every 150 ms.
Laser-induced microtubule damages
Laser induced microtubule damage was performed using a Laser illuminator iLas2 (Roper Scientific) set up on an inverted microscope (Ti-E, Nikon) with a 60x Nikon APO TIRF Oil objective. iLas2 is a dual axis galvanometer based optical scanner that focuses the Laser beam on the sample (diffraction limited spot size) on the whole field of view of the camera. Laser displacement, exposure time and repetition rate were controlled using Metamorph software (version 7.7.9.0, Universal Imaging). To damage Alexa-561 labeled microtubules, a 50 mW / 561 nm laser was used at 90% power performing 30 repetitions within a field of approx. 4 μm × 4 μm size. To merely photobleach microtubules, 20 repetitions were carried out at 80% laser power. In order to break microtubules, 50 repetitions at 100% laser power were used.
Measurement of microtubule persistence length
The microtubule is described as an inextensible slender filament with length L and bending rigidity κ, which is bent in two dimensions by the fluid flow. Its elastic energy E is given by
(1) |
The vector r(s) denotes the position of the filament parameterized by the arc length s and λ denotes a Lagrange multiplier associated with the inextensibility condition ∣dr/ds∣=1. The force exerted on the filament is given by the functional variation of the potential E with respect to the filament position vector r
(2) |
The filament orientation is fixed by the seed orientation at s=0, whereas the other end of the filament at s=L is force-free. The hydrodynamic drag exerted by the fluid flow on a slender filament is given by
(3) |
where vb denotes the velocity field measured by the bead displacements, μ denotes the viscosity of the fluid and g denotes a geometrical factor of order 1, which depends on the distance of the filament from the surface, the radius of the filament and the distance of the beads from the surface. ⨂ denotes the outer product and I is the identity tensor. In mechanical equilibrium
(4) |
which determines the equilibrium shape of the filament subject to the appropriate boundary conditions. The filament rigidity was determined by solving Eqs. (1-4) using the AUTO-07p softwage package 44 and by minimizing the function
(5) |
where rR(s) denotes the measured position of the filament. The persistence length is then given by Lp=κ/(KBT). ω is a measure for the distance between the shapes of two microtubules. In the fitting routine for the experimentally measured microtubule shapes, ω denotes the distance between the shape of the experimental snake and an inextensible flexible filament subjected to the same flow as the experimental snake.
We assumed that the origin of the microtubule was clamped in the direction of the seed. To correct for a measurement error of the microtubule origin, we optimized Eq. 5 also for the position of the microtubule origin.
The analytic determination of the geometrical factor g is difficult, since (i) the distance of the filament from the surface is not known but is <100 nm (the depth of the evanescent wave field), (ii) the fluid velocity is determined by imaging of beads with a radius of 250 nm, which are visible with TIRF and (iii) the velocity field close to the surface is distorted by the PEG brush. We assume that g is approximately constant for all experiments. From an independent measurement of microtubule persistence length based on thermal fluctuations 9 we have calculated g = 0.27 ± 0.11.
Modelling of microtubule softening
Using numerical simulations we tested whether the observed bending-induced softening of microtubules was localized or rather extended over a larger portion of the microtubule. To that end we calculated theoretically the shapes of microtubules with a spatially dependent rigidity of the form
(6) |
where κ0 (κp) denotes the microtubule rigidity in the unsoftened (softened) region, s0 and Δs denote the center position and the width of the softened region and ε denotes the width of the transition region between the softened and unsoftened part of the microtubule. The shapes of microtubules with an inhomogeneous rigidity [Eq. (6)] were fitted to the shapes of microtubules with a homogeneous rigidity to obtain an apparent average stiffness ⟨κ⟩, as we did for experimentally obtained microtubules shapes using Eq. (5). For the calculations all lengths were scaled by the length L of the microtubule and the forces were scaled by the hydrodynamic drag force per cross-section gηv. The shape of a microtubule with homogenous stiffness then depends on a single dimensionless parameter .
Apparent stiffness (<κ>/κ0) is the stiffness of an homogeneous microtubule whose shape best fits the observed (or simulated) deformation. It is higher than the stiffness of the soft part except when this part gets long enough and the two values match.
In figure 5d, we worked with numerical microtubules with an apparent stiffness of ⟨κ⟩/κ0 = 0.5. We calculated the scaled fit parameter ω/L for microtubule with varying parameters of the perturbation Δs/L and κp/κ0 and different ratios κ0/L3gηv, corresponding to different deflections of the unsoftened microtubule. All other parameters were kept constant, i.e. s0/L = 0.33 and ε/L=0.02.
To match experimentally obtained scaled fit parameters ω/L to theoretical ones, we picked bending cycles were microtubules showed a scaled effective rigidity ratio (The subscript denotes the number of the bending cycle.). We then matched the deflection of the first bending cycle x/L and the experimental fit quality parameter ωn/Ln to the theoretical curves to obtain an estimation of the width of the softened region (see Fig. 5d). Experimental points were spread between Δs/L =0 and 0.6, which supports the hypothesis that the bending induced damages were not always highly localized but often extended over a larger portion of the microtubule.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Denis Chrétien for interesting discussions about microtubule defects and Marileen Dogterom and Ted Salmon for bringing to our attention the seminal work of Robley Williams. This work has been supported by an HFSP funding to MT and MVN (RGY0088/2012) and an ERC funding to MT (starting grant 310472).
References
- 1.Mimori-Kiyosue Y. Shaping microtubules into diverse patterns: Molecular connections for setting up both ends. Cytoskeleton. 2011;68:603–618. doi: 10.1002/cm.20540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van der Vaart B, Akhmanova A, Straube A. Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009;37:1007–13. doi: 10.1042/BST0371007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schek HT, Gardner MK, Cheng J, Odde DJ, Hunt AJ. Microtubule assembly dynamics at the nanoscale. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1445–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dogterom M, Surrey T. Microtubule organization in vitro. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013;25:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vignaud T, Blanchoin L, Théry M. Directed cytoskeleton self-organization. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:671–682. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Howard J. Elastic and damping forces generated by confined arrays of dynamic microtubules. Phys. Biol. 2006;3:54–66. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/3/1/006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hawkins T, Mirigian M, Selcuk Yasar M, Ross JL. Mechanics of microtubules. J. Biomech. 2010;43:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mohrbach H, Johner A, Kulić IM. Cooperative lattice dynamics and anomalous fluctuations of microtubules. Eur. Biophys. J. 2012;41:217–39. doi: 10.1007/s00249-011-0778-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gittes F, Mickey B, Nettleton J, Howard J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 1993;120:923–934. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoey D. a, Downs ME, Jacobs CR. The mechanics of the primary cilium: An intricate structure with complex function. J. Biomech. 2012;45:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pampaloni F, et al. Thermal fluctuations of grafted microtubules provide evidence of a length-dependent persistence length. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:10248–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603931103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sui H, Downing KH. Structural basis of interprotofilament interaction and lateral deformation of microtubules. Structure. 2010;18:1022–31. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mandelkow E, Schultheiss R, Rapp R, Müller M, Mandelkow E. On the Surface Lattice of Microtubules: Helix Starts, Protofilament Number, Seam, and Handedness. J. Cell Biol. 1986;102:1067–1073. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kis A, et al. Nanomechanics of microtubules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;89:248101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.248101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Díaz JF, Barasoain I, Andreu JM. Fast kinetics of Taxol binding to microtubules. Effects of solution variables and microtubule-associated proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:8407–19. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211163200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Davis LJ, Odde DJ, Block SM, Gross SP. The Importance of Lattice Defects in Katanin-Mediated Microtubule Severing in Vitro. Biophys. J. 2002;82:2916–2927. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75632-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mohrbach H, Kulić IM. Motor Driven Microtubule Shape Fluctuations: Force from within the Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99:218102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.218102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yvon AMC, Gross DJ, Wadsworth P. Antagonistic forces generated by myosin II and cytoplasmic dynein regulate microtubule turnover, movement, and organization in interphase cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001;98:8656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141224198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gupton SL, Salmon WC, Waterman-Storer CM. Converging populations of f-actin promote breakage of associated microtubules to spatially regulate microtubule turnover in migrating cells. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:1891–9. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01276-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mandato C. a, Bement WM. Actomyosin transports microtubules and microtubules control actomyosin recruitment during Xenopus oocyte wound healing. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:1096–105. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00420-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brangwynne CP, Mackintosh FC, Weitz DA. Force fluctuations and polymerization dynamics of intracellular microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007;104:16128–16133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703094104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bicek AD, et al. Anterograde Microtubule Transport Drives Microtubule Bending in LLC-PK1 Epithelial Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009;20:2943–2953. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-09-0909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Laan L, et al. Cortical Dynein Controls Microtubule Dynamics to Generate Pulling Forces that Position Microtubule Asters. Cell. 2012;148:502–514. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goetz JG, et al. Endothelial cilia mediate low flow sensing during zebrafish vascular development. Cell Rep. 2014;6:799–808. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Odde DJ, Ma L, Briggs AH, Demarco A, Kirschner MW. Microtubule bending and breaking in living fibroblast cells. J. Cell Sci. 1999;3288:3283–3288. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.19.3283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Waterman-Storer CM, Salmon ED. Actomyosin-based retrograde flow of microtubules in the lamella of migrating epithelial cells influences microtubule dynamic instability and turnover and is associated with microtubule breakage and treadmilling. J. Cell Biol. 1997;139:417–34. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.2.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bicek AD, Tüzel E, Kroll DM, Odde DJ. Analysis of microtubule curvature. Methods Cell Biol. 2007;83:237–68. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)83010-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kurachi M, Hoshi M, Tashiro H. Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1995;30:221–8. doi: 10.1002/cm.970300306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Venier P, Maggs a C., Carlier MF, Pantaloni D. Analysis of microtubule rigidity using hydrodynamic flow and thermal fluctuations. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:13353–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Portran D, Gaillard J, Vantard M, Théry M. Quantification of MAP and molecular motor activities on geometrically controlled microtubule networks. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2013;70:12–23. doi: 10.1002/cm.21081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sangid MD. The physics of fatigue crack initiation. Int. J. Fatigue. 2013;57:58–72. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chrétien D, Metoz F, Verde F, Karsenti E, Wade RH. Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1992;117:1031–40. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.5.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schaap IT, de Pablo PJ, Schmidt CF. Resolving the molecular structure of microtubules under physiological conditions with scanning force microscopy. Eur. Biophys. J. 2004;33:462–7. doi: 10.1007/s00249-003-0386-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Janson ME, Dogterom M. A bending mode analysis for growing microtubules: evidence for a velocity-dependent rigidity. Biophys. J. 2004;87:2723–36. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.038877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brangwynne CP, et al. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 2006;173:733–41. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200601060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krieg M, Dunn AR, Goodman MB. Mechanical control of the sense of touch by β-spectrin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16:224–33. doi: 10.1038/ncb2915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dye RB, Flicker PF, Lien DY, Williams RC. End-stabilized microtubules observed in vitro: stability, subunit, interchange, and breakage. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1992;21:171–86. doi: 10.1002/cm.970210302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cordier P, Tournilhac F, Soulié-Ziakovic C, Leibler L. Self-healing and thermoreversible rubber from supramolecular assembly. Nature. 2008;451:977–80. doi: 10.1038/nature06669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Murphy EB, Wudl F. The world of smart healable materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010;35:223–251. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shelanski ML. Chemistry of the filaments and tubules of brain. J. Histochem. Cytochem. Off. J. Histochem. Soc. 1973;21:529–539. doi: 10.1177/21.6.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Malekzadeh-Hemmat K, Gendry P, Launay JF. Rat pancreas kinesin: identification and potential binding to microtubules. Cell. Mol. Biol. (Noisy-le-grand) 1993;39:279–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hyman A, et al. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:478–85. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJ, Whitesides GM. Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Anal. Chem. 1998;70:4974–84. doi: 10.1021/ac980656z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Doedel EJ. Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations. 2007 at < http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~gabriel/auto07/auto.html>.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.