Abstract
Salicylic acid (SA) has a central role in activating plant resistance to pathogens. SA levels increase in plant tissue following pathogen infection and exogenous SA enhances resistance to a broad range of pathogens. To study the relevance of the SA signaling in the flg22 response, we investigated the responses of SA-related mutants to flg22, a 22-amino acid peptide of the flagellin bacterial protein. We identified SA as an important component of the flg22-triggered oxidative burst, a very early event after flg22 detection, and gene induction, an early event. SA acted partially by enhancing accumulation of FLS2 mRNA. We also provide new evidence that NPR1 play a role in SA-induced priming event that enhances the flg22-triggered oxidative burst, which is correlated with enhancement of the flg22-induced callose deposition. Based on these observations, we conclude that SA signaling is required for early as well as late flg22 responses.
Keywords: Callose deposition, FLS2, Flg22, Flg22-triggered oxidative burst, FRK1, NPR1, SA, SID2, SA-mediated priming, WRKY29
The plant immune system is broadly divided into 2: microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMPs)-triggered immunity (MTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI).1-3 MTI is activated in response to the detection of MAMPs, such as flagellin. Direct recognition of the flg22 epitope of flagellin by the FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2) receptor protein is sufficient for inducing immune responses.4,5 ETI is mediated by resistance (R) proteins. In the host plant, recognition of an effector or its activity by the appropriate R protein triggers ETI, which leads to strong local defense responses that stop pathogen growth.2 Recent studies have shown considerable overlap in the events occurring during MTI and ETI. Both involve SA accumulation, pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression, and systemic acquired resistance (SAR).6-9
Flg22 recognition by FLS2 initiates a plethora of signaling responses in sequential order. Very early responses, within 1 to 5 minutes, triggered by flg22 include the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), altered ion fluxes across the plasma membrane, and the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Early responses follow within 2 to 30 minutes and include ethylene biosynthesis, receptor endocytosis, and gene activation. Late responses include callose deposition, seedling growth inhibition,10 and SA biosynthesis,6 and occur within hours to days.
In Arabidopsis, basal levels of cellular SA are approximately 15 μM. Following pathogen infection, SA is synthesized through the isochorismate pathway11-13 and can increase to approximately 200 μM. Flg22 treatments also enhance SA biosynthesis. This increased synthesis is dependent on SID2, which encodes an enzyme in the isochorismate pathway. Flg22-induced SA caused gene expression change and pathogen growth inhibition.6 These results led us to ask if SA signaling was involved in very early flg22 responses, specifically in the oxidative burst. To test this, we measured the flg22-triggered oxidative burst in the wild-type Arabidopsis (WT, ecotype Columbia) and the following mutants: sid2 and eds5 are deficient in SA biosynthesis and have low SA levels compared to the WT14,15, cim6 has higher SA levels than the WT,16 and npr1 has a block in SA signaling.17 The flg22-triggered oxidative burst was suppressed in sid2 and eds5 compared to the WT, while it was greater in cim6. Because the oxidative burst occurred within a few minutes of flg22 exposure, it is possible that endogenous basal SA was responsible for the oxidative burst, acting at an early step in the signaling pathway. Another early event, gene activation, was also measured by qRT-PCR analysis. Flg22-dependent induction of WRKY29 and FRK1 genes was reduced by almost 50% in the sid2 mutant compared to WT.18 These results suggest that basal SA is required to establish sufficient flg22-triggered early responses such as oxidative burst and marker gene induction.
The levels of the FLS2 transcript and its protein affect the flg22-triggered oxidative burst.19 According to a recent report, ethylene signaling contributes to FLS2 expression. The ethylene insensitive protein 2 (EIN2)-dependent transcription factors, EIN3 and EIN3-like1 (EIL1), directly control FLS2 expression.20 In our system, basal FLS2 mRNA was strongly enhanced in cim6 and suppressed in sid2, compared to the WT.18 However, this suppression was less in sid2 than in ein2. A possible explanation is that ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE2 (ICS2) may have a partially redundant function, by mutation in isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1) so that SA accumulation is not completely blocked in sid2.21 Basal expression of EIN2 mRNA was also suppressed in sid2 compared to WT.18 It may be that the basal levels of SID2 and SA in the WT plant are required for EIN2 transcript accumulation, a suggestion that implies that SA signaling components are accompanied by other factors, such as EIN2, on regulation of FLS2 gene. Based on our observations, we suggest that SA contributes to early flg22 responses through activating FLS2 mRNA accumulation.
Signaling downstream from SA is primarily regulated by NPR1.22 NPR1 functions in SA-mediated induction of pathogenesis-related gene 1 (PR1) in the nucleus.23 In our study, NPR1 was required for SA-mediated priming of the enhanced flg22 responses. Pretreatment with low concentrations of SA enhanced not only the FLS2 transcript level but also the amplitude of FLS2-mediated flg22 responses, including the oxidative burst and callose deposition, mediated by NPR1.18 Other reports are consistent with our finding that NPR1 plays a role in SA-mediated priming for enhanced defense responses.24,25 Although the molecular basis of the SA-mediated priming effect in flg22 responses is unclear, we hypothesize that SA pretreatment act at the post-translational level through protein modification. SA has been shown to control the nuclear translocation of NPR1 through cellular redox changes.26,27 NPR1 homeostasis is controlled by SA binding to NPR3 and NPR4 in a concentration-dependent manner.28,29 In WT plants, basal SA may bind to the NPR4 complex, thereby allowing some NPR1 to accumulate, conferring basal resistance.28,29 In our system, pre-incubation with SA alone promoted FLS2 transcript accumulation compared to the untreated plant.18 The enhanced level of FLS2 mRNA and free stable NPR1, possibly due to SA pretreatment, might contribute to accelerated FLS2-dependent flg22 responses.
Conclusions
Our study suggests an effect of SA signaling at a very early stage of the flg22 response, the oxidative burst. This very early effect may have consequences in the late flg22 responses, such as callose deposition. The molecular basis is currently unknown but warrants further study.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (PJ0082002011) of the Rural Development Administration of Korea, and the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) Research Initiative Program.
References
- 1. Abramovitch RB, Anderson JC, Martin GB. Bacterial elicitation and evasion of plant innate immunity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:601-11; PMID:16936700; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006; 124:803-14; PMID:16497589; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature 2006; 444:323-9; PMID:17108957; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature05286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gomez-Gomez L, Felix G, Boller T. A single locus determines sensitivity to bacterial flagellin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1999; 18:277-84; PMID:10377993; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00451.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T. FLS2: an LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 2000; 5:1003-11; PMID:10911994; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80265-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tsuda K, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F. The interplay between MAMP and SA signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2008; 3:359-61; PMID:19513222; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/psb.3.6.5702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Vlot AC, Dempsey DA, Klessig DF. Salicylic Acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2009; 47:177-206; PMID:19400653; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Durrant WE, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2004; 42:185-209; PMID:15283665; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Mishina TE, Zeier J. Pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition rather than development of tissue necrosis contributes to bacterial induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2007; 50:500-13; PMID:17419843; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03067.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Ann Rev Plant Biol 2009; 60:379-406; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ryals JA, Neuenschwander UH, Willits MG, Molina A, Steiner HY, Hunt MD. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1996; 8:1809-19; PMID:12239363; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wildermuth MC, Dewdney J, Wu G, Ausubel FM. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature 2001; 414:562-5; PMID:11734859; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/35107108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dempsey DA, Vlot AC, Wildermuth MC, Klessig DF. Salicylic Acid biosynthesis and metabolism. The Arabidopsis book . Am Soc Plant Biol 2011; 9:e0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nawrath C, Metraux JP. Salicylic acid induction-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis express PR-2 and PR-5 and accumulate high levels of camalexin after pathogen inoculation. Plant Cell 1999; 11:1393-404; PMID:10449575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rogers EE, Ausubel FM. Arabidopsis enhanced disease susceptibility mutants exhibit enhanced susceptibility to several bacterial pathogens and alterations in PR-1 gene expression. Plant Cell 1997; 9:305-16; PMID:9090877; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.9.3.305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Maleck K, Neuenschwander U, Cade RM, Dietrich RA, Dangl JL, Ryals JA. Isolation and characterization of broad-spectrum disease-resistant Arabidopsis mutants. Genetics 2002; 160:1661-71; PMID:11973319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cao H, Bowling SA, Gordon AS, Dong X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1994; 6:1583-92; PMID:12244227; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.6.11.1583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yi SY, Shirasu K, Moon JS, Lee SG, Kwon SY. The activated SA and JA signaling pathways have an influence on flg22-triggered oxidative burst and callose deposition. PLoS One 2014; 9:e88951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mersmann S, Bourdais G, Rietz S, Robatzek S. Ethylene signaling regulates accumulation of the FLS2 receptor and is required for the oxidative burst contributing to plant immunity. Plant Physiol 2010; 154:391-400; PMID:20592040; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.110.154567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Boutrot F, Segonzac C, Chang KN, Qiao H, Ecker JR, Zipfel C, Rathjen JP. Direct transcriptional control of the Arabidopsis immune receptor FLS2 by the ethylene-dependent transcription factors EIN3 and EIL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:14502-7; PMID:20663954; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1003347107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Garcion C, Lohmann A, Lamodiere E, Catinot J, Buchala A, Doermann P, Metraux JP. Characterization and biological function of the ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE2 gene of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2008; 147:1279-87; PMID:18451262; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.108.119420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Dong X. NPR1, all things considered. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2004; 7:547-52; PMID:15337097; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Spoel SH, Koornneef A, Claessens SM, Korzelius JP, Van Pelt JA, Mueller MJ, Buchala AJ, Metraux JP, Brown R, Kazan K, et al. NPR1 modulates cross-talk between salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways through a novel function in the cytosol. Plant Cell 2003; 15:760-70; PMID:12615947; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.009159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Conrath U, Pieterse CM, Mauch-Mani B. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 2002; 7:210-6; PMID:11992826; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02244-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kohler A, Schwindling S, Conrath U. Benzothiadiazole-induced priming for potentiated responses to pathogen infection, wounding, and infiltration of water into leaves requires the NPR1 NIM1 gene in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2002; 128:1046-56; PMID:11891259; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.010744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Spoel SH, Dong X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12:89-100; PMID:22273771; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nri3141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wu Y, Zhang D, Chu JY, Boyle P, Wang Y, Brindle ID, De Luca V, Despres C. The Arabidopsis NPR1 protein is a receptor for the plant defense hormone salicylic acid. Cell Rep 2012; 1:639-47; PMID:22813739; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fu ZQ, Yan S, Saleh A, Wang W, Ruble J, Oka N, Mohan R, Spoel SH, Tada Y, Zheng N, et al. NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature 2012; 486:228-32; PMID:22699612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Moreau M, Tian M, Klessig DF. Salicylic acid binds NPR3 and NPR4 to regulate NPR1-dependent defense responses. Cell Res 2012; 22:1631-3; PMID:22785561; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/cr.2012.100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
