Abstract
Cytokinins represent a group of plant hormones that have been shown to be essential for plant growth and development. A recent large-scale phylogenetic analysis of components of the cytokinin signal transduction pathway revealed, among other findings, the existence of a second, previously unknown subfamily of cytokinin receptors. Here we report that the cytokinin binding domains of the members of the 2 subfamilies contain residues that are highly conserved in either or in both subfamilies. Experiments using fluorescence microscopy hint at an ER and a plasma membrane localization for 2 members of the newly identified subfamily. These data provide new insights in the conservation of sequence and localization properties among the 2 subfamilies.
Keywords: cytokinin, cytokinin receptor, evolution, signal transduction, two-component signaling
Abbreviations
- CHASE
cyclase histidine kinase associated sensory extracellular
- CHK
CHASE domain containing histidine kinase
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
Cytokinins are a group of phytohormones that are crucial for many developmental processes as well as for the response of plants to changes in their abiotic and biotic environment.1 The cytokinin signal transduction is mediated via a multistep His-to-Asp phospho-relay system. Binding of cytokinin leads to an autophosphorylation of the histidine kinase domain of the receptor and is followed by an intramolecular phosphotransfer to the response regulator receiver domain. Subsequently downstream signaling components are activated by phosphorylation.2 Binding of cytokinin is accomplished by the Cyclin Histidine kinase Associated Sensory Extracellular (CHASE) domain and thus histidine kinase receptors including such a domain are referred to as CHASE domain containing Histidine Kinases (CHKs3). The steadily rising number of complete genome sequences from different plant species has facilitated the phylogenetic analysis of single genes and of whole pathways. This is also true for the cytokinin regulatory pathway.4-8 Recently, we have conducted an in-depth analysis of putative cytokinin signaling components comprising more than 40 species ranging from cyanobacteria to angiosperms.9 This analysis identified a subfamily of cytokinin receptors not described until now. Sequence analysis revealed that while the domain architecture of the members of this subfamily is identical to those of the classical cytokinin receptors, the CHASE domains of the 2 subfamilies are rather diverse.
Here we report the results of additional analyses, both bioinformatic and experimental. A global comparison of the CHASE domains showed moderate levels of similarity between the new and the classical cytokinin receptors (between 38% and 48% aa identity), while classical as well as the newly identified displayed a higher level of conservation of the CHASE domains among themselves, the latter with a wide variation (71–96% and 47–81%, respectively) (Fig. 1). A detailed comparison between members from both subfamilies revealed many regions within the CHASE domains of the classical receptors in which the amino acid sequences are identical or highly similar. In those areas only few residues are also highly conserved in the CHASE domains of the newly identified cytokinin receptors. Those amino acids which are conserved in both, quite divergent subfamilies are likely to be crucial for the function of cytokinin receptors and thus good candidates for further investigation. In this context it is surprising that residues which have been shown to be important for cytokinin binding in the classical cytokinin receptors10,11 display a much lower level of conservation among members of the new subfamily (6.5% identity as compared to 50% in the classical receptors).9 However, despite these differences in key positions of the sequence of the CHASE domain, members from both subfamilies have been shown to bind trans-zeatin, the most active cytokinin in the binding assay.9,11-13 Interestingly, we also observed a 19 aa stretch at the C-terminal end of the CHASE domains (positions 238 to 256 of the alignment) which is highly conserved in the classical receptor subfamily, but shows no conservation among the newly identified subclade of cytokinin receptors (Fig. 1). The biological function of these residues awaits further characterization.
Two members of the newly identified subfamily of cytokinin receptors, MpCHK1 from Marchantia polymorpha, and PpCHK4 from Physcomitrella patens, have been functionally characterized.9 A cytokinin binding assay confirmed the ability of these 2 receptors to bind cytokinin and a bacterial complementation assay confirmed a dose-dependent translation of the cytokinin signal into a cellular response.9 In order to fulfill its biological role a protein needs to localize to the appropriate subcellular compartment. To investigate to which cellular compartment the 2 members of the newly identified subfamily localize, vector constructs encoding N-terminal GFP fusion proteins of MpCHK1, and PpCHK4, respectively, under the control of the 35S promoter were transiently transformed into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and fluorescence was analyzed in epidermal cells. The GFP:MpCHK1 protein showed fluorescence signals in what seems to be the perinuclear regions and at least partial co-localization with the ER-maker mCherry-HDEL (Fig. 2 A1–3).14 To a lesser extent also a co-localization with the plasma membrane dye FM4-64 was detected (Fig. 2 B1–3). The fluorescence of GFP:PpCHK4, also localized to the same regions highlighted by the ER marker protein mCherrry-HDEL (Fig. 2 C1–3). In addition, also for this members of the newly identified subfamily of cytokinin receptors a signal was detected which co-localized with the plasma membrane. Thus for both members of the newly identified subfamily a localization to the subcellular compartments of the ER and the plasma membrane seem the most likely. This subcellular localization is similar to the one described for classical cytokinin receptors previously.15-17
In summary, the additional data presented here corroborate the previously published analyses and thus further emphasize the role of the members of the newly described subfamily as functional cytokinin receptors.9 However, their biological role is currently unclear. Since members from both subfamilies are encoded in the genome of P. patens, more in-depth information, such as the temporal and spatial expression patterns during plant development and in response to environmental stimuli or their ligand-binding preferences, will provide further insights into possible differences of their in planta functions. Such experiments and the results of the currently ongoing genome sequencing projects from early diverging land plants and charophyte algae will help to elucidate the evolution and functional divergence of cytokinin receptors.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
We are grateful for the financial support of the Volkswagen Foundation to N.G. (Az I/83477) and of the EU Dunia BEAM program to M.H.
References
- 1. Kieber JJ, Schaller GE. Cytokinins. Arabidopsis Book 2014; 12:e0168; PMID:24465173; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1199/tab.0168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gruhn N, Heyl A. Updates on the model and the evolution of cytokinin signaling. Curr Op Plant Biol 2013; 16:569-74; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Heyl A, Brault M, Frugier F, Kuderova A, Lindner AC, Motyka V, Rashotte AM, Schwartzenberg KV, Vankova R, Schaller GE. Nomenclature for members of the two-component signaling pathway of plants. Plant Physiol 2013; 161:1063-5; PMID:23324541; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.112.213207, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pils B, Heyl A. Unraveling the evolution of cytokinin signaling. Plant Physiol 2009; 151:782-91; PMID:19675156; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.109.139188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Frebort I, Kowalska M, Hluska T, Frebortova J, Galuszka P. Evolution of cytokinin biosynthesis and degradation. J Exp Bot 2011; 62:2431-52; PMID:21321050; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/err004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Spichal L. Cytokinins–recent news and views of evolutionally old molecules. Funct Plant Biol 2012; 39:267-84; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1071/FP11276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ishida K, Yamashino T, Nakanishi H, Mizuno T. Classification of the genes involved in the two-component system of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2010; 74:2542-5; PMID:21150091; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1271/bbb.100623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Steklov MY, Lomin SN, Osolodkin DI, Romanov GA. Structural basis for cytokinin receptor signaling: an evolutionary approach. Plant Cell Rep 2013; 32:781-93; PMID:23525743; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00299-013-1408-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gruhn N, Halawa M, Snel B, Seidl MF, Heyl A. A subfamily of putative cytokinin receptors is revealed by an analysis of the evolution of the two-component signaling system of plants. Plant Physiol 2014; 165:227-37; PMID:24520157; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.113.228080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Heyl A, Wulfetange K, Pils B, Nielsen N, Romanov GA, Schmülling T. Evolutionary proteomics identifies amino acids essential for ligand-binding of the cytokinin receptor CHASE domain. BMC Evol Biol 2007; 7:62; PMID:17439640; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2148-7-62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hothorn M, Dabi T, Chory J. Structural basis for cytokinin recognition by Arabidopsis thaliana histidine kinase 4. Nature Chem Biol 2011; 7:766-8; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nchembio.667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Inoue T, Higuchi M, Hashimoto Y, Seki M, Kobayashi M, Kato T, Tabata S, Shinozaki K, Kakimoto T. Identification of CRE1 as a cytokinin receptor from Arabidopsis. Nature 2001; 409:1060-3; PMID:11234017; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/35059117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Spichal L, Rakova NY, Riefler M, Mizuno T, Romanov GA, Strnad M, Schmülling T. Two cytokinin receptors of Arabidopsis thaliana, CRE1 AHK4 and AHK3, differ in their ligand specificity in a bacterial assay. Plant Cell Physiol 2004; 45:1299-305; PMID:15509853; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pch132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nelson B, Cai X, Nebenführ A. A multi-color set of in vivo organelle markers for colocalization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant Journal 2007; 51:1126-36; PMID:17666025; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03212.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wulfetange K, Lomin SN, Romanov GA, Stolz A, Heyl A, Schmülling T. The cytokinin receptors of Arabidopsis thaliana are locating mainly to the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Physiol 2011; 156:1808-18; PMID:21709172; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.111.180539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lomin SN, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Romanov GA, Sakakibara H. Ligand-binding properties and subcellular localization of maize cytokinin receptors. J Exp Bot 2011; 62:5149-59; PMID:21778179; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/err220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Caesar K, Thamm AM, Witthoft J, Elgass K, Huppenberger P, Grefen C, Horak J, Harter K. Evidence for the localization of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptors AHK3 and AHK4 in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Exp Bot 2011; 62:5571-80; PMID:21841169; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/err238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Method Mol Biol 2009; 537:39-64; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1189-91; PMID:19151095; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]