Hand hygiene technique quality evaluation in nursing and medicine students of two academic courses

Abstract

Objective:

because they are health professionals, nursing and medical students' hands during internships can function as a transmission vehicle for hospital-acquired infections.

Method:

a descriptive study with nursing and medical degree students on the quality of the hand hygiene technique, which was assessed via a visual test using a hydroalcoholic solution marked with fluorescence and an ultraviolet lamp.

Results:

546 students were assessed, 73.8% from medicine and 26.2% from nursing. The area of the hand with a proper antiseptic distribution was the palm (92.9%); areas not properly scrubbed were the thumbs (55.1%). 24.7% was very good in both hands, 29.8% was good, 25.1% was fair, and 20.3% was poor. The worst assessed were the male, nursing and first year students. There were no significant differences in the age groups.

Conclusions:

hand hygiene technique is not applied efficiently. Education plays a key role in setting a good practice base in hand hygiene, theoretical knowledge, and in skill development, as well as good practice reinforcement.

Introduction

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are one of the main causes for morbility and mortality in the health field, which constitute one of the main issues in global public health 1.

Health professionals' hands are one of the main transmission mechanisms for HAIs. Hand washing with water and antiseptic soap before and after patient contact is the most efficient technique proven to prevent hospital-acquired infection 2.

However, in everyday clinical practice, hand hygiene (HH) is happening less often than desired 3.

The World Health Organizations' (WHO) recommendations about enhancement strategies and better HH practice are considered as reference criteria, setting up several educational interventions targeting health professionals 4.

Both in Spain 5and in the Autonomous Community of Extremadura 6, promotion and knowledge development as well as a culture of patient safety are being stressed among professionals and patients in all health service levels. While performing its working lines on a local stage, the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz, the Sociedad Española de Medicina Preventiva, Salud Pública e Higiene (SEMPSPH) planned educational seminars and workshops about hand hygiene and its assessment.

Because they are health professionals, nursing and medical students' hands during internships can function as a transmission vehicle for hospital-acquired infections, and can cause patient, object and surface contamination 7.

In this study we plan to assess the current state of HH in nursing and medicine students, enrolled to the Facultad de Medicina del Campus de Badajoz of the Universidad de Extremadura (UEX), who were doing an internship at the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz (CHUICB).

Method

Our study was a descriptive, cross-sectional study that occurred in two periods of time, and a sample was limited by the UEX, namely the Medicine Campus where medicine (six courses) and nursing (four courses) undergraduate studies are available. Three hundred seventeen students were enrolled in the nursing degree 2012/13 class, and 294 students in the 2013/14 class. For the medicine degree, there were 877 students for the 2012/13 class and 878 for the 2013/14 class.

The CHUICB is integrated with the Hospital Infanta

Cristina, Hospital Perpetuo Socorro, Hospital MaternoInfantil and the Specialty Center. This complex belongs to the Health Department of Badajoz, which served a populace of 276, 154 people; it owned 831 beds, had a total of 40, 434 hospital admissions, 31, 533 surgical procedures, 2,430 deliveries and the mean stay was 6.84 days 8.

No selection of the student' sample was conducted. All students attending preventive medicine and public health classes of the biomedical sciences department and community nursing I and II classes of the nursing department were included. Student participation was voluntary.

Nursing and medical students from the Medicine Campus of Badajoz who participated in our study were: nursing degree students in the second and third years, medicine degree students in second and fifth year, and medicine baccalaureate students in sixth year (last class of the old program).

The study occurred in two periods of time: Academic year 2012/213 and 2013/2014

The study was conducted by the same professionals in the preventive medicine and public health service, on several days and different schedules in order to study the whole sample of students. A one-hour theory lesson about the foundations of hand, object, and surface contamination, epidemiology on the chain of bacteria transmission, and the different kinds of HH (instructions, material and technique) were taught during the school year of 2012/13 and 2013/14. The lesson focused on hygienic hand washing, antiseptic hand washing and hand rubbing with hydroalcoholic solutions. Likewise, instructions on applying HH, following the methodology of the "five moments of hand hygiene" proposed by the WHO were stressed.

During practical teaching, nursing and medical students attended a simulated specialty medical practice session. Small groups were established with five students. The reason for visit was explained (nausea) and students were asked to care for the patient (taking vital signs); asking them to perform a correct HH following WHO commendations. There was no sink or water and soap for performance of the HH, only hydroalcoholic solution was available which students had to use, applying knowledge acquired in the theoretical class.

Identifying variables included: date, center, academic course, nursing or medicine, sex and age.

An alcohol-based mix marked with fluorescence and an ultraviolet (UV) lamp (Dermalux(r), Derma LiteCheck by Dermalux - Training) were used to assess HH.

A visual assessment of the correct fluorescencemarked hydroalcoholic solution (HAS) distribution (categories yes/no) was performed. Five main sections were considered: palms, back of the hand, between the fingers, finger tips/nails separately for each hand (right and left) and for both hands.

For the final quality assessment of the HH technique, some categories were established: "very good" if HAS was spread throughout all sections, "good", if four sections were exposed, "fair" if two sections were not exposed, and "poor" if three or more regions were left without HAS exposure (Likert-type scale with four categories). Subsequently, they were divided in two categories: "proper HH" when the right hand, left hand and both hands obtained a "very good" or "good" notation; "inadequate HH" when the right hand, left hand or both hands obtained a "fair" or "poor" notation.

Limitations to the study included: lack of a randomized sample, as well as the concomitant differences in year of education, which could bias the study.

A separate descriptive analysis of the variables was conducted, presenting the mean corresponding to the qualitative variables, and centralizing measures as well as dispersion of the quantitative variables.

A chi-square (χ2) was used for the bivariant analyses of the qualitative variables and a Student t-test for the quantitative variables, considering as significative the values p>0.05.

Excel of Microsoft Office 2007 was used for the coding of the obtained data, and SPSS version 15.0 for the statistical analysis.

Ethical factors: Participation of all subjects in the study was voluntary. Confidentiality of data (Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13, of the Protection of Personal Character Data) and statistics (group coding, analysis and results) were kept secret at all times; likewise, the compliance was maintained with the Hospital Infanta Cristina de Badajoz's (Spain) Ethics Committee's research protocols.

Results

A total of 546 students participated in the study, 403 (73.8%) of them were medical students and 143 (26.2%) were nursing students; 216 (39.6%) students were from the 2012/2013 class and 330 (60.4%) students were from the 2013/2014 class. Males accounted for 30.45% (144), and 69.6% (380) were female. The mean age of the sample was 21.4 ± 3.73 years of age.

In general, HAS distribution on the right hand was correct in 96.5% of cases on the palm, 86.1% between the fingers, 72.7% on the back of the hand, 70.3% on the finger tips, and 56.9% on the thumbs. For the left hand: 95.2% on the palm, 82.6% between the fingers, 80.4% on the back of the hand, 68.7% on the finger tips, and 63% on the thumbs. Considering both hands, th eHAS covered: 92.9% on the palms, 78.02% between the fingers, 65.2% on the finger tips, 64.2% on the back of the hand, and 55.1% on the thumbs.

Through direct observation, right hand, left hand and both hand HH technique quality was obtained. It was noted that 34.1% performed HH on the right hand by spreading HAS on five sections properly, 29.5% performed good HH, 21.7% achieved a fair score, and 14.6% achieved a poor score. For the left hand, 38.5% obtained a very good HH score, 30.9% had one mistake a 19.9% had two mistakes, 20.4% had three or more mistakes. Thus, 24.7% in both hands was very good, 29.8% was good, 25.1% was fair, and 20.3% was poor.

Category results were as follows: right hand HH was appropriate in 63.5%, 69.4% on left hand and HH for both hands was accurate in 50.2% of the students.

In terms of bivariant analysis by sex, men spread HAS worse than women in between the fingers and the back of the hand, on both the right and left hand ((table 1). Observation for both hands showed that men did not spread HAS to the thumbs and in between the fingers as often as women did. Likewise, it was the men who obtained a "fair" notation on the right hand and "poor" on both hands, with significant differences versus women. These differences kept grouping the evaluation into two HH categories, which were: inappropriate HH on the right hand, and both hands, for men ((table 1). There were no difference in the men and women groups based on year, course or age.

Table 1. HAS spreading on students' hands as per sex, marked section and degree of sanitation. Facultad de Medicina de Badajoz. Badajoz. Spain. 2012/2014.

Table 2shows that nursing students performed inappropriate HH on the right hand 2.2 times and on the left hand 1.7 times (p<0,05) more often than medical students. Future nurses obtained a "fair" and "poor" notation on the right hand and "poor" on the left hand, with significant differences compared to the medical students. Hand sections most often left without HAS by nursing students versus medical students were the palm, thumb and in between fingers of right hand; back of the hand and between the fingers on left hand, leaving back of hands, thumbs and in between fingers poorly washed on both hands ( Table 2, p<0,05).

Table 2. HAS spreading on students' hands as per nursing and medicine studies, year, sex, age and section. Facultad de Medicina de Badajoz. Badajoz. Spain. 2012/2014.

Hand hygiene technique quality was significatively study or age ( Table 3). Table 3shows how a lack of better for the 2013/14 class versus the previous class rubbing HAS in between the fingers and thumbs stood and in women; there were no differences per year of out as a factor most involved in inappropriate HH.

Table 3. Degree of HH performance in nursing and medical students' hands as per class, year, gender, age and section. Facultad de Medicina de Badajoz. Badajoz. Spain. 2012/2014.

Discussion

HH is recognized globally as a key factor in the reduction of hospital-acquired infection occurrence. The WHO recommends that research and publications focus on the establishment of hydroalcoholic solution and assessment of its use via diverse strategies. Educational and awareness programs, workshops, reminder posters, direct observation to assess completion and

adherence stand out among them^{(7, 9)}, as well as indirect assessment via proxy variables such as HAS use and hospital-acquired infection rates.

However, routine checking 10of methodology quality to improve HH adherence in order to reduce hospital-acquired infection is still inadequate to prove the efficiency of this approach; in addition to maintaining the biases in this type of study 11.

Currently, the use of a motivational tool named positive deviation is suggested. This tool identifies groups of individuals that solve problems better than others without additional resources, which in a study conducted by Mara AR et al. 12obtained an improvement, although no conclusive results were obtained in another routine revision 13.

In another HH compliance study 14with interns in a Brazilian hospital, 50% lower adherence was obtained, but this is no guarantee of performed handwashing efficiency via verification/assessment of proper HH technique. Likewise, nursing students had their internship in different hospitals, which prevented a follow-up; the introduction of this assessment in an undergraduate program becomes justified along with the five-step HH proposed by the WHO, complete with adherence studies during the clinical internship and career.

There are few studies that assess the HH technique via marked HAS spreading. This is probably due to the HH guide provided by the WHO and other institutions that describe the solutions, their efficiency, and application sequence, but which do not provide statements about quality assessment.

Macdonald 15assessed marked-HAS distribution in three sections (fingers, palms and thumbs) in trained staff, but the study does not detail the percentage of the sample who rubbed each individual section properly. In another study by the same author, the surface of a practice workshop was assessed before and after in the traumatology service, providing an estimate of the palm and back of the hand sections.

Widmer 16found a great improvement and correlation between HAS covered areas scores and hand

colony-forming units (CFUs), before and after specific training, which was compulsory for the staff.

Hautmaniere 17and Sutter 18performed a beforeafter assessment of specific HH training programs for medical students, improving sections covered with HAS and CFU spreading; they concluded that this tool is easy and trustworthy for gauging the HH technique.

Kampf 19found that 53% of subjects studied left out at least one section during HH, using the reference technique in the EN1500 norm; although the sample was small (55 people) and had many comparisons (16 variables).

Via a compulsory educational course, Szilágy 20obtained an assessment of 67-72% from 4642 participants with a "good" notation; in that study, the sections forgotten most frequently were the top section of the fingers close to the nails, the thenar eminence, and the wrist. These results are similar to the present study, although this last one was performed on students and was voluntarily.

In Spain, only the study conducted by RamonCanton 21assessed HH technique in healthcare professionals at their work post, with no previous compulsory workshop. The results showed that 95.2% of people assessed left at least one section unclean, and the sections with the worst scores were the thumbs and fingers. In our study, the same assumption gives a result of 75.27% with at least one section of the hand left unclean, and the sections with worst scoring were the thumbs and in between the fingers.

Other studies^{(17, 22)} involving medical and nursing students obtained a rating of inadequate HAS HH of 78.5% and 81.5%, much higher than our study (49.82%).

Furthermore, 26.6% of the students were observed to have attended the practicum with long nails, with nail polish or artificial nails, watches or bracelets; these circumstances complicate correct HH performance, and were not taken into account in other studies.

It is important to point out that the right hand on its own was better cleaned with HAS than the left one, except the thumb; considering that most of the human population is right-handed, this entails that the dominant hand is washed less properly. Therefore, emphasis should be placed on raising awareness and training the non-dominant hand on HH.

Likewise, comments and questions of the students attending were heeded, this helped identify the fact that they had difficulty in recognizing the opportunities for HH according to the different procedures that form their usual clinical practice. All these elements must be taken into account and incorporated into cross-disciplinary education during undergraduate studies.

Knowledge that health care students must have about hand, object and surface contamination and HH issues in hospital-acquired infection prevention and control is key to improve HH quality and adherence ^(23-24) to provide safe health services.

Conclusions

All staff in a health institution, and specially heath care professionals, including students during their internship, must deliver safe health services that prevent hospital-acquired infection in their everyday practice.

Therefore, proper education and training in proper HH technique performance and regular creation of campaigns and workshops remains a priority.

Moreover, effectiveness of HH also depends on quality technique, and we believe that regular practicum and assessment using this immediate feedback method could provide a simple, quick tool with large effect in students and professionals; it can ascertain HH technique quality at an individual level, after a course/workshop or at their place of work, giving them the necessary skills and knowledge as well as awareness and better adherence, which need improvement.

Hand hygiene improvement must be a priority for healthcare authorities in all levels, be it undergraduate, graduate studies or ongoing training, where there is an individual responsibility for each healthcare professional. All HH programs must include different actions, such as alcoholic solution introduction, staff education and motivation, as well as assessment and counselling in HH technique quality.