Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015 Nov;21(11):2619–2624. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000521

Assessment of Sex Differences for Treatment, Procedures, Complications and Associated Conditions among Adolescents Hospitalized with Crohn’s Disease

Jennifer L Dotson 1,2, Josh B Bricker 2, Michael D Kappelman 3, Deena Chisolm 2, Wallace V Crandall 1
PMCID: PMC4624304  NIHMSID: NIHMS696127  PMID: 26214808

Abstract

Background

Sex differences among adults in healthcare treatment and outcomes have been reported, however, there is a paucity of literature regarding pediatric populations, particularly adolescents with Crohn’s disease (CD). The objective was to identify whether sex differences exist with respect to complications, procedures, and medication usage (corticosteroids, biologic agents, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN)) among hospitalized adolescents with CD.

Methods

Adolescents with CD (n=5782) hospitalized between April 1, 2004–June 30, 2012 were selected from the Pediatric Health Information System database with a 1:1 ratio of males to females by hospital. Frequency of disease complications, associated conditions, procedures performed, and medication usage were analyzed with non-parametric statistical tests for the existence of sex differences.

Results

5782 patients were included with a median age of 15 years. Females were slightly more likely to have anemia (29% vs. 25%, p=0.012), infection (12% vs. 8%, p=0.001), and mood disorder (9% vs. 6%, p<0.001), whereas males had more maturational delays (3% vs. 1%, p=0.004), and malnutrition (18% vs. 14%, p=0.027). Among procedures, only one category demonstrated a sex difference: females had more blood product transfusions (9% vs. 6%, p<0.001). Female rates for corticosteroids (62%), biologic agents (16%) and TPN (18%) were not statistically different from those for males (62%, 15%, and 20%, respectively). There were no differences in length of stay by sex.

Conclusions

This cross-sectional study of an administrative database identified few sex differences among adolescents with CD. The effect sizes were universally small and generally consistent with known sex differences unrelated to IBD.

Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, pediatrics, sex

Introduction

Understanding sex differences in disease symptoms and response to treatment may be an important pathway for understanding disease etiology, treatment and improving overall care1, 2. Investigations into sex differences have alerted providers in diverse fields to potential biases in diagnosis and treatment24 and suggested changes to traditional practice.57. While sex differences in prevalence, treatment, and patient outcomes have been identified and studied among adults(e.g., depression, cardiovascular, and autoimmune diseases1, 813), much less is known concerning such differences in pediatric populations, particularly for Crohn’s disease (CD), a chronic, relapsing, autoimmune disease.

Consistent evidence for sex differences in the treatment, course and outcomes of both adult and pediatric patients with CD is lacking. A large retrospective cohort analysis of adults in the Kaiser Permanente Inflammatory Bowel Disease registry found no differences in the risk for rehospitalization or colectomy.14 In other adult cohort studies, females were more likely to have extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs, such as arthritis, erythema nodosum, and ocular manifestations),15, 16 while males had higher disease remission rates17 but a greater decline in bone mineral density compared with non-CD controls.18, 19

Prior studies in children are conflicting: demonstrating either greater severity in males, greater severity in girls, or finding no sex differences. For example, males appear to be at a higher risk than females for growth failure.2022 In contrast, females may be more likely to have hypoalbuminemia and mouth sores at diagnosis, and generally have a more severe disease course.20 In a study assessing risk factors for intestinal resection surgery, females were at greater risk compared to males.23 Several studies have reported no sex differences with respect to patient symptoms or EIMs,24 risk of intestinal resection surgery,23, 25, 26 or in disease severity, BMI, height velocity, or medication use.27

Given the conflicting evidence among mostly small-scale studies in the pediatric CD literature, the present study sought to address this gap by using a large administrative database with diagnostic and treatment data across multiple, geographically diverse children’s hospitals to evaluate a cross-section of hospitalized, male and female adolescent patients with respect to medical management, complications, and procedures. If sex plays a significant role in Crohn’s etiology and outcomes, this effect may be pronounced during puberty. Further, as adolescence is a period of peak onset of CD, it may be an optimal time to assess potential sex differences. The main objective of the present study was to identify whether sex differences exist with respect to complications, procedures, and medication usage (corticosteroids, biologic agents and total parenteral nutrition (TPN)) among hospitalized adolescent patients with CD.

Materials and Methods

Data Source

The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) is an administrative database established and maintained by the Children’s Hospital Association (CHA) on behalf of its 44 affiliated children’s hospitals which comprise approximately 25% of pediatric centers in the United States. Data (e.g. demographics, diagnoses, procedures, and medications) are collected in standardized formats for each hospitalized patient. Reliability and validity are assured by each hospital and by CHA before database inclusion. For this study period, data from 44 hospitals were available and all 44 hospitals were included.

Study Design

This was a cross-sectional study of male and female adolescent patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of CD. This study was approved by the Nationwide Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Study Cohort

The study population was derived from adolescent patients (age 13 to 18 years) identified in the PHIS database by a primary or secondary diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (ICD-9: 555.x) during their first (index) hospital admission within the study time period of January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2012. This age range was selected as a simple way to encompass the majority of pubertal/growth changes for both sexes. To be included, patients had to have sex recorded, and no admissions in the preceding three months. Patients with admission dates within the first three months (January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004) were excluded in order to increase the likelihood that their initial hospitalization occurring at the beginning of the study period was not a readmission related to a prior hospitalization. Although this study did not consider encounters outside of the initial hospitalization, patients were also excluded if there were inconsistencies in the reporting of sex or birthdate across encounters. This more conservative approach allowed us to reduce reporting errors. Specific hospitalizations were excluded if the encounter was for an ostomy take down (CPT 44625, ICD-9 procedure code 46.5x) or if the encounter had the same admission and discharge date.

Subsequent to applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a subset of male and female subjects was randomly selected to achieve a 1:1 ratio at the hospital level (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart for the final cohort selection process and exclusion criteria. After applying exclusion criteria to the initial database sample of patients age 13 to 18 years, and subsequently applying a 1:1 ratio of males to females within each hospital, the final study cohort was determined. MRN = medical record number.

Measures

Demographic descriptors collected for each subject (distinguished by encrypted medical record number (MRN)) included sex, age, race, ethnicity, payor status, ZIP code (encrypted), median neighborhood income, and hospital location. Payor status was categorized into one of three groups: commercial insurance, Medicaid, or other (APPENDIX A). Individuals were initially assigned to one of 4 race categories: a specific race category (e.g., White, Black, Asian, if they consistently endorsed the same race across all encounters), “mixed race” (if they endorsed more than one race), “missing” (if race was consistently missing across encounters), or “inconsistent” (if there were any reporting discrepancies). For demographic analysis, race and ethnicity were defined as: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other (including Asian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, mixed-race, and other), and Hispanic.

Additional variables collected included admission and discharge dates, discharge ID, intensive care unit (ICU) admission flag, length of stay (LOS), and use of specific medications (corticosteroids, biologic agents and TPN). Median neighborhood income was derived by the PHIS data analytics team using the United States Census-based values corresponding to their actual ZIP codes. Regional divisions (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West) were derived from hospital location based on the 2010 Census Regions and Divisions of the United States (www.census.gov).

To assess the use of the most frequent procedures and surgical complications among all patients in the final study cohort, lists of the top 200 procedural codes and complication diagnoses codes were generated. From these two lists, procedural and complication/associated diagnoses groups were constructed based on clinical relevance to CD. Compared to a simple search of specific ICD-9 codes, this approach was less likely to inadvertently overlook common procedural and diagnostic codes. (APPENDIX B)

Outcomes

The primary outcome measures included the presence of complications, procedure utilization, and medication utilization. The secondary outcome was LOS.

Analysis plan

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify sex differences on age at admission and median income. The Chi-square test for contingency tables was used to identify sex differences in the proportion of male versus female subjects on race/ethnicity and payor status, medications received, complications, and procedures performed. All tests were two-sided. For each set of analyses, we assumed a critical alpha of 0.05 and made Bonferroni corrections for multiple testing where appropriate.

Effect sizes were calculated (e.g. phi (ϕ) for Chi-square contingency tables) to describe the magnitude of statistically significant sex differences. We considered an effect size greater than 0.15 to be clinically meaningful; although a small effect may not be apparent in individual practice, it is important from a population health perspective where small effects are magnified in the larger population of affected individuals. With 2891 males and 2891 females, this study has at least 80% power to detect small effects using a X2 test with a critical p-value of 0.05. Analyses were performed using R 3.0.1 (R foundation of Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2012).

Results

Demographics

Table 1 summarizes the demographics according to sex. By design (1:1 ratio of males to females within each hospital), there were no sex frequency differences by region.

TABLE 1.

Demographic Characteristics by Sex for a Hospitalized Adolescent Crohn’s Disease Cohort

Variable Female
n (%)
Male
n (%)
P value
Total 2891 (50) 2891 (50) n/a
Race/Ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 2024 (70) 1936 (67) 0.194
 Non-Hispanic Black 475 (16) 512 (18)
 NH Other 173 (6) 204 (7)
 Hispanic 133 (5) 150 (5)
 Missing 57 (2) 63 (2)
 Inconsistent 29 (1) 26 (1)
Age, Median [Q1–Q3]1 15 [14–17] 15 [14–17] 0.081
Region2
 Midwest 857 (30) 857 (30) n/a
 Northeast 701 (24) 701 (24)
 South 946 (33) 946 (33)
 West 387 (13) 387 (13)
Payor3
 Commercial 1276 (44) 1255 (43) 0.592
 Medicaid 605 (21) 647 (22)
 Other 969 (34) 946 (33)
 Missing 41 (1) 43 (1)
Neighborhood income, Median4
[Q1–Q3]
$46,982
[$36,111–$61,059]
$46,565
[$35,975–$61,275]
0.769
1

Median age represented with quartile ranges: Q1 and Q3 refer to the first (25%) and third (75%) quartiles

2

Region assignment: Midwest (OH, IL, MI, IN, MO, WI, MN, NE, ND, SD, KS, IA); Northeast (ME, NH, VT, NY, MA, CT, RI, PA, NJ); South (DC, MD, VA, DE, WV, KY, TN, NC, SC, GA, AL, MS, FL, LA, TX, AR, OK); West (AZ, CO, CA, WA, OR, MT, WY, ID, NV, UT, NM, HI, AK)

3

Payor status was collated into the following categories: Commercial=Blue Cross, HMO, TRICARE, Commercial HMO, Commercial PPO, Commercial Other; Medicaid=Medicaid, In-state Medicaid (managed care), In-state Medicaid (other), Out-of-state Medicaid (all); Other=Medicare, Title V, Other government, Workers Compensation, other insurance company, self-pay, no charge, other payor, charity, hospital chose not to bill; Missing=not recorded, invalid code, unknown

4

Median of median income based on 2010 US Census Data compared to ZIP code reported at index hospitalization

Medication usage

Female rates for corticosteroids (n = 1781, 62%), biologic agents (n = 460, 16%) and TPN usage (n = 509, 18%) were not statistically different from those for males (n = 1798, 62%, p = 1; n = 444, 15%, p = 1; and n = 570, 20%, p = 0.129 (adjusted based on Bonferroni correction), respectively).

Complications

Among the top 200 diagnoses reported, 75 were found to have clinical relevance to CD. The frequency of reported ICD-9 codes ranged from 0.4% for “Intestinal obstruction NOS” (ICD-9 code = 560.9; not otherwise specified (NOS)) to 11.1% for “Anemia NOS” (ICD-9 code=285.9). There were sex differences in 4 of 19 diagnostic groups identified. Females were slightly more likely to have anemia (29% versus 25%, p = 0.012, ϕ = 0.04), infection (12% versus 8%, p = 0.001, ϕ = 0.05), and mood disorder (9% versus 6%, p < 0.001, ϕ = 0.07), whereas males had more pubertal complications (such as delays in maturation, including short stature and sexual development; 3% versus 1%, p = 0.004, ϕ = 0.05), and more nutritional complications (including malnutrition and under nutrition, 18% versus 14%, p = 0.027) (Table 2). With respect to greater infections among females, it should be noted that these were largely explained by urinary tract infections (UTIs); when UTIs were removed from the infection category in a post hoc analysis, the sex difference for the remaining infections as a group was diminished and no longer significant (10% female versus 8% males, X2 = 7.76, p = 0.102, ϕ = 0.04).

TABLE 2.

Crohn’s Disease Related Diagnoses at Index Hospitalization

Variable Total Female
n (%)
Male
n (%)
P value1
Anemia 1552 834 (29) 718 (25) 0.012
Nutrition complications 928 419 (14) 509 (18) 0.027
Dehydration/hypovolemia 599 313 (11) 286 (10) 1
Infection (others) 585 340 (12) 245 (8) 0.001
Obstruction 553 243 (8) 310 (11) 0.060
Perianal disease 473 207 (7) 266 (9) 0.102
Mood Disorders 439 270 (9) 169 (6) <0.001
EIM 383 185 (6) 198 (7) 1
Intra-abdominal abscess 326 149 (5) 177 (6) 1
Electrolyte anomalies 220 111 (4) 109 (4) 1
Other 213 104 (4) 109 (4) 1
Fistula 167 79 (3) 88 (3) 1
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 154 90 (3) 64 (2) 0.760
C. difficile infection 145 72 (2) 73 (3) 1
Perforation/peritonitis 115 57 (2) 58 (2) 1
Pubertal complications 112 36 (1) 76 (3) 0.004
Autoimmune 63 42 (1) 21 (1) 0.190
Bacteremia/sepsis 48 29 (1) 19 (1) 1
Vitamin D deficiency 43 19 (1) 24 (1) 1
1

Bonferroni corrected p-values

Total cohort n=5782 (Female=2891 and Male=2891)

Bolded p values represent significant findings

Procedures

Among 84 CD-related procedures identified, the frequency of ICD-9 codes ranged from 0.1% for “Other laparoscopic partial excision of large intestine” (ICD-9 code = 17.39) to 34.8% for “Closed [endoscopic] biopsy of large intestine” (ICD-9 code = 45.25). Of 13 procedural categories (APPENDIX B), only one demonstrated a sex difference: females had more blood product transfusions compared to males (9% versus 6%, p=0.002, ϕ =0.05) (Table 3). There were no differences in LOS between males (mean = 6.5 ± 10.0, median = 4 days) and females (mean = 6.5 ± 7.4, median = 4 days) (p = 0.280, d = 0.002).

TABLE 3.

Crohn’s Disease Related Procedures at Index Hospitalization

Variable Total Female
n (%)
Male
n (%)
P value1
Endoscopies 2241 1116 (39) 1125 (39) 1
Colectomy 436 211 (7) 225 (8) 1
Blood product transfusions 426 251 (9) 175 (6) 0.002
Resection/anastomosis 227 97 (3) 130 (4) 0.390
Abdominal surgery 219 105 (4) 114 (4) 1
Wound/lesion related 184 87 (3) 97 (3) 1
Perianal/perineal procedures 181 80 (3) 101 (3) 1
Appendectomy 145 67 (2) 78 (3) 1
Ostomy 110 54 (2) 56 (2) 1
Central access 95 40 (1) 55 (2) 1
Other 55 32 (1) 23 (1) 1
Intra-abdominal fistula repair 25 11 (0) 14 (0) 1
Cholecystectomy 12 7 (0) 5 (0) 1
1

Bonferroni corrected p-values

Total cohort n=5782 (Female=2891 and Male=2891)

Bolded p values represent significant findings

Discussion

This study identified several small sex differences among CD related diagnoses and procedures, much of which is explained by known sex differences in the general population. The observed sex difference in anemia was expected given the increased prevalence of anemia in adolescent girls as compared to boys in the general population. The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) found a prevalence for iron-deficiency anemia of 2–5% among non-pregnant female adults (2–3% among adolescents) and 1–2% in male adults (< 1% among adolescents).28

Given that females have a higher baseline rate of anemia; it may not be surprising to have found a small difference in the rate of transfusions in our study. However, there are other sex related factors that may contribute to blood transfusions being more prevalent among adolescent females (9%) compared with males (6%). Androgens have a stimulating effect on erythropoiesis,29 with lower androgen levels and therefore lower hemoglobin concentrations in adolescent females.30 Also, given the wide inter-hospital variation in thresholds for transfusion,3133 such decisions are likely based on a combination of objective and subjective factors. Since females have been found to have a slightly greater tendency for self-disclosure,34 they may be more willing to communicate (and providers more likely to respond to35) subjective symptoms such as dizziness, headache, and fatigue, which may increase their likelihood for anemia-related transfusions in less severe cases. Finally, if females have a more severe disease course during initial hospitalization as previously suggested, a greater need for transfusion might be seen.20

As with anemia, we found sex differences for disorders involving depression as well as anxiety that may be explained by sex differences in the general population, with a higher prevalence of mood disorders among females.36 Sex-based differences in brain functioning as well as circulating gonadal steroids have different effects on cortisol response and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity. In addition to such biological differences, it has been speculated that the higher female incidence for depression and anxiety may reflect psychological differences, such as a differential response to stress from interpersonal life events.3740 Similarly, although we found differences in rates of infections, this was no longer significant after removing UTIs, a condition known to be more common among females during adolescence in the general population.41

In contrast, the difference in abnormal growth and development in our study are not readily explained by differences in the general population, and are consistent with findings from previous research. Growth failure, delayed puberty, subnormal height velocity, and short stature are all commonly observed among adolescents with CD generally4244. A previous study showed the risk for growth failure (height or height velocity at the fifth percentile) among girls was 0.28 times the risk in boys (p < 0.002) over a ten year follow-up, with a final cumulative incidence of 4.0% versus 12.6%.20 The rate of complications of growth and development in our study was lower than previously reported. We expected to observe a lower prevalence (under-reporting) of these conditions in our study cohort given that our study population was strictly an inpatient cohort. Growth, height velocity, and puberty are more likely to be clinically assessed, managed, and followed longitudinally, and thus more likely to be entered as diagnoses codes in an outpatient setting.

There were no sex differences among corticosteroid, biologic agent, or TPN usage. While no prior studies of CD medications in a hospitalized pediatric population were identified for comparison, there were three relevant studies of adult populations. Females were found to receive immunosuppressive medications less frequently,17 have lower cumulative corticosteroid use,18 and were slightly less likely to initiate infliximab infusions (non-significant trend)45 compared with males. Our results were consistent, however, with a large outpatient IBD study which also found no sex differences in medication use.27 Perhaps some of the differences that were seen in adults could be explained by less disease severity among adult women, impact of disease duration, or effects of treatment decisions which occur during pregnancy or child-bearing years.

There were several important limitations in the present study. We evaluated only the first index hospitalization for each patient, which does not address potential differences in outpatient management (not captured in PHIS) or in subsequent hospitalizations. We recognize that CD is mainly treated on an outpatient basis without hospitalization. The outpatient management and clinic visits are integral components in the management of adolescents with CD. Further, the PHIS database is not weighted for extrapolation to national estimates, thus results may not be generalizable to all pediatric centers. Also, this was a retrospective study based on administrative data, so reporting bias or classification errors may be present, although there are data quality measures in place to minimize errors. Since the findings were not based on detailed medical record review, we were unable to assess or control for disease phenotype, location or symptoms. Finally, while we believe that small observed differences are likely due to biological causes, we cannot rule out the possibility that they may also be due to other factors such as differential access to care, adherence, or treatment based on sex46, 47. The strengths of the study include its large sample size, regionally diverse population, and the focus on a hospitalized cohort with likely moderate to severe disease, thereby minimizing any confounding of severity with sex differences. We also focused on the adolescent population, which allowed us to better observe hormonal-based sex differences in a pediatric cohort.

In conclusion, this cross-sectional study of an administrative database identified few sex differences among adolescents with CD. The effect sizes were universally small and consistent with the expectations in the general population. Sex did not have a large effect on the outcomes assessed in this study.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data File A
Supplemental Data File B

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding: Dr. Dotson and this project were supported by the NASPGHAN Foundation/Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America Young Investigator Development Award. Dr. Kappelman was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08 DK088957). The study sponsors had no role in the study design or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Abbreviations

CD

Crohn’s disease

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

LOS

length of stay

PHIS

Pediatric Health Information System

TPN

total parenteral nutrition

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The remaining authors have no financial relationships or conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

References

  • 1.Institute of Medicine. Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Washington: National Academy Press; 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnson P, Fitzgerald T, Salganicoff A, et al. Sex-Specific Medical Research: Why Women’s Health Can’t Wait. Boston, MA: Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rucklidge JJ. Gender differences in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010;33:357–373. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2010.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gershon J. A meta-analytic review of gender differences in ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2002;5:143–154. doi: 10.1177/108705470200500302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rautaharju PM, Zhou SH, Wong S, et al. Sex differences in the evolution of the electrocardiographic QT interval with age. Can J Cardiol. 1992;8:690–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Enriquez JR, Pratap P, Zbilut JP, et al. Women tolerate drug therapy for coronary artery disease as well as men do, but are treated less frequently with aspirin, beta-blockers, or statins. Gend Med. 2008;5:53–61. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(08)80008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2551–2567. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Disparities and Inequalities Report–United States, 2011. MMWR. 2011:1–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jochmann N, Stangl K, Garbe E, et al. Female-specific aspects in the pharmacotherapy of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1585–1595. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rubtsov AV, Rubtsova K, Kappler JW, et al. Genetic and hormonal factors in female-biased autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:494–498. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Quintero OL, Amador-Patarroyo MJ, Montoya-Ortiz G, et al. Autoimmune disease and gender: plausible mechanisms for the female predominance of autoimmunity. J Autoimmun. 2012;38:J109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Piccinelli M, Wilkinson G. Gender differences in depression. Critical review. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:486–492. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.6.486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10:173–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Allison J, Herrinton LJ, Liu L, et al. Natural history of severe ulcerative colitis in a community-based health plan. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:999–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barreiro-de Acosta M, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Relationship between clinical features of Crohn’s disease and the risk of developing extraintestinal manifestations. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2007:19. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000243883.47938.aa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wagtmans MJ, Verspaget HW, Lamers CB, et al. Gender-related differences in the clinical course of Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1541–1546. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blumenstein I, Herrmann E, Filmann N, et al. Female patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases are treated less frequently with immunosuppressive medication and have a higher disease activity: a subgroup analysis of a large multi-centre, prospective, internet-based study. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bakker SF, Dik VK, Witte BI, et al. Increase in bone mineral density in strictly treated Crohn’s disease patients with concomitant calcium and vitamin D supplementation. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jahnsen J, Falch JA, Mowinckel P, et al. Body composition in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1556–1562. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gupta N, Bostrom AG, Kirschner BS, et al. Gender differences in presentation and course of disease in pediatric patients with Crohn disease. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e1418–1425. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sentongo TA, Semeao EJ, Piccoli DA, et al. Growth, body composition, and nutritional status in children and adolescents with Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31:33–40. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200007000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Griffiths AM, Nguyen P, Smith C, et al. Growth and clinical course of children with Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1993;34:939–943. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.7.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vernier-Massouille G, Balde M, Salleron J, et al. Natural history of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1106–1113. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thayu M, Shults J, Burnham JM, et al. Gender differences in body composition deficits at diagnosis in children and adolescents with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1121–1128. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gupta N, Cohen SA, Bostrom AG, et al. Risk factors for initial surgery in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1069–1077. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schaefer ME, Machan JT, Kawatu D, et al. Factors that determine risk for surgery in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:789–794. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee GJ, Kappelman MD, Boyle B, et al. Role of sex in the treatment and clinical outcomes of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:701–706. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318266241b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations to Prevent and Control Iron Deficiency Anemia in the United States. MMWR. 1998:1–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shahidi NT. Androgens and erythropoiesis. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:72–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197307122890205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dallman PR, Siimes MA. Percentile curves for hemoglobin and red cell volume in infancy and childhood. J Pediatr. 1979;94:26–31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80344-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Murphy MF, Brunskill S, Estcourt L, et al. How to further develop the evidence base for transfusion medicine. Blood Transfus. 2012;10:436–439. doi: 10.2450/2012.0038-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saxena S, Weiner JM, Rabinowitz A, et al. Transfusion practice in medical patients. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2575–2580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Murphy MF, Stanworth SJ, Yazer M. Transfusion practice and safety: current status and possibilities for improvement. Vox Sang. 2011;100:46–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dindia K, Allen M. Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:106–124. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Street RL. Gender differences in health care provider–patient communication: are they due to style, stereotypes, or accommodation? Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:201–206. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00171-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mazure CM, Maciejewski PK. The interplay of stress, gender and cognitive style in depressive onset. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2003;6:5–8. doi: 10.1007/s00737-002-0161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lebron-Milad K, Milad MR. Sex differences, gonadal hormones and the fear extinction network: implications for anxiety disorders. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kudielka BM, Kirschbaum C. Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: a review. Biol Psychol. 2005;69:113–132. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kajantie E, Phillips DI. The effects of sex and hormonal status on the physiological response to acute psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31:151–178. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, et al. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev. 2000;107:411–429. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saperston KN, Shapiro DJ, Hersh AL, et al. A comparison of inpatient versus outpatient resistance patterns of pediatric urinary tract infection. J Urol. 2014;191:1608–1613. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Savage MO, Beattie RM, Camacho-Hubner C, et al. Growth in Crohn’s disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999;88:89–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb14360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kanof ME, Lake AM, Bayless TM. Decreased height velocity in children and adolescents before the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1523–1527. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(88)80072-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Heuschkel R, Salvestrini C, Beattie RM, et al. Guidelines for the management of growth failure in childhood inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:839–849. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pressman AR, Hutfless S, Velayos F, et al. Patterns of infliximab use among Crohn’s disease patients in a community setting. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1265–1272. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kent JA, Patel V, Varela NA. Gender disparities in health care. Mt Sinai J Med. 2012;79:555–559. doi: 10.1002/msj.21336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Safran DG, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, et al. Gender differences in medical treatment: the case of physician-prescribed activity restrictions. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:711–722. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00405-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data File A
Supplemental Data File B

RESOURCES