Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1990 May;45(5):352–355. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.5.352

Dependence of maximal sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures on lung volume.

T Wanke 1, G Schenz 1, H Zwick 1, W Popp 1, L Ritschka 1, M Flicker 1
PMCID: PMC462469  PMID: 2382241

Abstract

The maximal sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures of six healthy volunteers (three women and three men) were measured at various lung volumes between residual volume and 95% of total lung capacity. At residual volume the mean (SD) maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure was 163 (18) cm H2O (1 cm H2O = 0.0981 kPa). With increasing lung volume the maximum pressures generated declined, so that at 95% of total lung capacity the mean pressure was 68 (15) cm H2O. Mouth pressures showed a similar relation to lung volume. At residual volume the mean maximum mouth pressure was 74 (8) cm H2O, compared with 38 (6) cm H2O at 95% of total lung capacity. The relation between pressure and lung volume was linear for measurements at lung volume levels between residual volume and 85% of total lung capacity; values at 95% of total lung capacity, however, were lower than predicted from the linear regression of the other points. The use of a second order polynomial regression showed a higher coefficient of determination in all cases (0.72 and 0.69 for transdiaphragmatic and mouth pressures on the basis of all pressure values for all subjects). Sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures show a predictable dependence on lung volume, supporting their use as measures of global inspiratory muscle power and diaphragm strength respectively.

Full text

PDF
352

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black L. F., Hyatt R. E. Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 May;99(5):696–702. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.5.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Byrd R. B., Hyatt R. E. Maximal respiratory pressures in chronic obstructive lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968 Nov;98(5):848–856. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1968.98.5.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COOK C. D., MEAD J., ORZALESI M. M. STATIC VOLUME-PRESSURE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM DURING MAXIMAL EFFORTS. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Sep;19:1016–1022. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.5.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis J., Goldman M., Loh L., Casson M. Diaphragm function and alveolar hypoventilation. Q J Med. 1976 Jan;45(177):87–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Troyer A., Estenne M. Limitations of measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure in detecting diaphragmatic weakness. Thorax. 1981 Mar;36(3):169–174. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.3.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson C. J., Edmonds J. P., Hughes G. R. Diaphragm function and lung involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med. 1977 Dec;63(6):926–932. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90547-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibson G. J., Pride N. B., Davis J. N., Loh L. C. Pulmonary mechanics in patients with respiratory muscle weakness. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977 Mar;115(3):389–395. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1977.115.3.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koulouris N., Mulvey D. A., Laroche C. M., Green M., Moxham J. Comparison of two different mouthpieces for the measurement of Pimax and Pemax in normal and weak subjects. Eur Respir J. 1988 Oct;1(9):863–867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kreitzer S. M., Saunders N. A., Tyler H. R., Ingram R. H., Jr Respiratory muscle function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Mar;117(3):437–447. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.117.3.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Loh L., Goldman M., Davis J. N. The assessment of diaphragm function. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977 Mar;56(2):165–169. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197703000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller J. M., Moxham J., Green M. The maximal sniff in the assessment of diaphragm function in man. Clin Sci (Lond) 1985 Jul;69(1):91–96. doi: 10.1042/cs0690091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rochester D. F., Braun N. M., Laine S. Diaphragmatic energy expenditure in chronic respiratory failure. The effect of assisted ventilation with body respirators. Am J Med. 1977 Aug;63(2):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roussos C., Macklem P. T. The respiratory muscles. N Engl J Med. 1982 Sep 23;307(13):786–797. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198209233071304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sigrist S., Thomas D., Howell S., Roussos C. The effect of aminophylline on inspiratory muscle contractility. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Jul;126(1):46–50. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson S. H., Cooke N. T., Edwards R. H., Spiro S. G. Predicted normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in caucasian adults and children. Thorax. 1984 Jul;39(7):535–538. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.7.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES