Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3162–3166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3162

Osteocalcin gene promoter-binding factors are tissue-specific nuclear matrix components.

J P Bidwell 1, A J Van Wijnen 1, E G Fey 1, S Dworetzky 1, S Penman 1, J L Stein 1, J B Lian 1, G S Stein 1
PMCID: PMC46259  PMID: 8475055

Abstract

The nuclear matrix appears to play an important role in developmental gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. To better understand this role, we examined nuclear matrix DNA-binding proteins that are sequence-specific and interact with the osteocalcin gene promoter. Multiple protein-DNA interactions involving two distinct nuclear matrix proteins occur within the 5' regulatory sequences (nt -640 to -430). One of these proteins, NMP-1, is a ubiquitous, cell growth-regulated protein that is related to the transcription factor ATF and resides in both the nuclear matrix and the nonmatrix nuclear compartment. The other protein, NMP-2, is a cell type-specific, 38-kDa promoter factor that recognizes binding sites resembling the consensus site for the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein C/EBP and is localized exclusively on the nuclear matrix. NMP-1 and NMP-2 each interact with two nuclear matrix protein-binding elements. These elements are present near key regulatory sites of the osteocalcin gene promoter, such as the principal steroid hormone (vitamin D)-responsive sequences. Binding in this region of the osteocalcin gene promoter suggests transient associations with the nuclear matrix that are distinct from the stable interactions of matrix attachment regions. Our results are consistent with involvement of the nuclear matrix in concentrating and/or localizing transcription factors that mediate the basal and steroid hormone responsiveness of osteocalcin gene transcription.

Full text

PDF
3162

Images in this article

3163Fig. 1
on p.3163
3164Fig. 2
on p.3164
3164Fig. 3
on p.3164
3165Fig. 4
on p.3165
3165Fig. 5
on p.3165
3165Fig. 6
on p.3165

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Nuclear protein matrix: association with newly synthesized DNA. Science. 1975 Jul 25;189(4199):291–293. doi: 10.1126/science.1145202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonifer C., Vidal M., Grosveld F., Sippel A. E. Tissue specific and position independent expression of the complete gene domain for chicken lysozyme in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 1990 Sep;9(9):2843–2848. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07473.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dignam J. D., Lebovitz R. M., Roeder R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Mar 11;11(5):1475–1489. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dworetzky S. I., Fey E. G., Penman S., Lian J. B., Stein J. L., Stein G. S. Progressive changes in the protein composition of the nuclear matrix during rat osteoblast differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4605–4609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dworetzky S. I., Wright K. L., Fey E. G., Penman S., Lian J. B., Stein J. L., Stein G. S. Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins are components of a nuclear matrix-attachment site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4178–4182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Faisst S., Meyer S. Compilation of vertebrate-encoded transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jan 11;20(1):3–26. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fey E. G., Capco D. G., Krochmalnic G., Penman S. Epithelial structure revealed by chemical dissection and unembedded electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 2):203s–208s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.203s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fey E. G., Krochmalnic G., Penman S. The nonchromatin substructures of the nucleus: the ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-containing and RNP-depleted matrices analyzed by sequential fractionation and resinless section electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1986 May;102(5):1654–1665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fey E. G., Penman S. Nuclear matrix proteins reflect cell type of origin in cultured human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):121–125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Getzenberg R. H., Pienta K. J., Coffey D. S. The tissue matrix: cell dynamics and hormone action. Endocr Rev. 1990 Aug;11(3):399–417. doi: 10.1210/edrv-11-3-399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Getzenberg R. H., Pienta K. J., Huang E. Y., Coffey D. S. Identification of nuclear matrix proteins in the cancer and normal rat prostate. Cancer Res. 1991 Dec 15;51(24):6514–6520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. He D. C., Nickerson J. A., Penman S. Core filaments of the nuclear matrix. J Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;110(3):569–580. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jarman A. P., Higgs D. R. Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3337–3344. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klehr D., Maass K., Bode J. Scaffold-attached regions from the human interferon beta domain can be used to enhance the stable expression of genes under the control of various promoters. Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 5;30(5):1264–1270. doi: 10.1021/bi00219a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumara-Siri M. H., Shapiro L. E., Surks M. I. Association of the 3,5,3'-triiodo-L-thyronine nuclear receptor with the nuclear matrix of cultured growth hormone-producing rat pituitary tumor cells (GC cells). J Biol Chem. 1986 Feb 25;261(6):2844–2852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Landers J. P., Spelsberg T. C. New concepts in steroid hormone action: transcription factors, proto-oncogenes, and the cascade model for steroid regulation of gene expression. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1992;2(1):19–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lawrence J. B., Singer R. H., Marselle L. M. Highly localized tracks of specific transcripts within interphase nuclei visualized by in situ hybridization. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):493–502. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90924-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lian J. B., Stein G. S. Transcriptional control of vitamin D-regulated proteins. J Cell Biochem. 1992 May;49(1):37–45. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240490108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Majeska R. J., Rodan S. B., Rodan G. A. Parathyroid hormone-responsive clonal cell lines from rat osteosarcoma. Endocrinology. 1980 Nov;107(5):1494–1503. doi: 10.1210/endo-107-5-1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marsden M. P., Laemmli U. K. Metaphase chromosome structure: evidence for a radial loop model. Cell. 1979 Aug;17(4):849–858. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90325-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nelkin B. D., Pardoll D. M., Vogelstein B. Localization of SV40 genes within supercoiled loop domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Dec 11;8(23):5623–5633. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.23.5623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nickerson J. A., Krockmalnic G., He D. C., Penman S. Immunolocalization in three dimensions: immunogold staining of cytoskeletal and nuclear matrix proteins in resinless electron microscopy sections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2259–2263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Owen T. A., Aronow M., Shalhoub V., Barone L. M., Wilming L., Tassinari M. S., Kennedy M. B., Pockwinse S., Lian J. B., Stein G. S. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol. 1990 Jun;143(3):420–430. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041430304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ozono K., Sone T., Pike J. W. The genomic mechanism of action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Bone Miner Res. 1991 Oct;6(10):1021–1027. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650061002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Phi-Van L., von Kries J. P., Ostertag W., Strätling W. H. The chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2302–2307. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pienta K. J., Getzenberg R. H., Coffey D. S. Cell structure and DNA organization. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1991;1(4):355–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robinson S. I., Nelkin B. D., Vogelstein B. The ovalbumin gene is associated with the nuclear matrix of chicken oviduct cells. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):99–106. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90379-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schaack J., Ho W. Y., Freimuth P., Shenk T. Adenovirus terminal protein mediates both nuclear matrix association and efficient transcription of adenovirus DNA. Genes Dev. 1990 Jul;4(7):1197–1208. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.7.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stein G. S., Lian J. B., Owen T. A. Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 1990 Oct;4(13):3111–3123. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.4.13.2210157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stuurman N., Meijne A. M., van der Pol A. J., de Jong L., van Driel R., van Renswoude J. The nuclear matrix from cells of different origin. Evidence for a common set of matrix proteins. J Biol Chem. 1990 Apr 5;265(10):5460–5465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeitlin S., Parent A., Silverstein S., Efstratiadis A. Pre-mRNA splicing and the nuclear matrix. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;7(1):111–120. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zenk D. W., Ginder G. D., Brotherton T. W. A nuclear matrix protein binds very tightly to DNA in the avian beta-globin gene enhancer. Biochemistry. 1990 Jun 5;29(22):5221–5226. doi: 10.1021/bi00474a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van Wijnen A. J., Bidwell J., Lian J. B., Stein J. L., Stein G. S. Stairway assays: rapid localization of multiple protein/DNA interaction sites in gene-regulatory 5' regions. Biotechniques. 1992 Mar;12(3):400–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES