Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2015 Apr 29;25(2):142–149. doi: 10.1002/pon.3820

Table 4.

Multivariate models for quality of life (QOL) measures in overweight/obese breast cancer survivors (N = 692)a

QOL Physical R2=0.47 QOL Mental R2=0.33 IOC Positive Impact Scale R2=0.14 IOC Negative Impact Scale R2=0.40

β Coefficient P Value β Coefficient P Value β Coefficient P Value β Coefficient P Value
Age - - - - - - −.012 <.0001
Race/ethnicity
    African-American - - - - .225 .002 −.366 <.0001
    Asian - - - - .542 .001 - -
    Hispanic - - - - .203 .02 - -
Education - - −.045 .05 −.159 .0002 - -
Not married - - −.098 .0003 - - - -
Time since diagnosis .001 .04 - - - - - -
Cancer stage - - - - - - .257 .0007
Chemotherapy - - - - .233 <.0001 - -
Hospitalizations in last year −.052 .001 - - - - - -
Emergency room visits in last year −.088 .001 - - - - - -
No. of prescription medications −.022 .001 - - - - .032 .05
Moderate/vigorous activity .011 .01 .013 .01 - - - -
CES-D Score* −.008 <.0001 x x −.013 .0005 .031 <.0001
BCPT symptom clusters**
    Nausea −.075 .003 −.073 .02 - - - -
    Bladder control - - −.032 .03 - - - -
    Musculoskeletal pain −.115 <.001 - - - - -
    Cognitive problems - - −.127 <.0001 .081 .004 .069 .02
    Weight problems - - −.041 .0007 - - .115 <.0001
    Arm problems −.035 .01 - - - - .082 .01
a

Values shown are β coefficients and P values for significant associations with each of the four outcomes, when controlled for all variables tabulated. A dash (-) indicates nonsignificant terms in the models. Quality of life outcomes were log transformed. No significant associations were identified for BMI, number of co-morbidities, or endocrine therapy with any of the QOL outcomes.

*

CES-D score was omitted as a predictor for QOL Mental because of high correlation between the two (rho = −0.72).

**

BCPT symptom clusters for hot flashes and vaginal problems were not associated with any QOL indicators.