Six New Polyketide Decalin Compounds from Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Penicillium aurantiogriseum 328#

Abstract

Six new compounds with polyketide decalin ring, peaurantiogriseols A–F (1–6), along with two known compounds, aspermytin A (7), 1-propanone,3-hydroxy-1-(1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,5-dihydroxy-1,2,6-trimethyl-1-naphthalenyl) (8), were isolated from the fermentation products of mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium aurantiogriseum 328#. Their structures were elucidated based on their structure analysis. The absolute configurations of compounds 1 and 2 were determined by ¹H NMR analysis of their Mosher esters; the absolute configurations of 3–6 were determined by using theoretical calculations of electronic circular dichroism (ECD). Compounds 1–8 showed low inhibitory activity against human aldose reductase, no activity of inducing neurite outgrowth, nor antimicrobial activity.

1. Introduction

Mangrove is a specialized marine ecosystem. Mangrove endophytic fungi have drawn a lot of attention for the past few years as a rich source of bioactive and novel compounds [1,2]. In the course of our exploration for the metabolites of endophytic fungi from the mangrove in the South China Sea, numerous new compounds were obtained [3,4,5]. In this study, six new compounds, peaurantiogriseols A–F (1–6), along with two known compounds, aspermytin A (7) and 1-propanone,3-hydroxy-1-(1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,5-dihydroxy-1,2,6-trimethyl-1-naphthalenyl) (8), were isolated from endophytic fungus Penicillium aurantiogriseum 328# from the bark of mangrove plant Hibiscus tiliaceus. Compounds 1–8 (Figure 1) had similar polyketide decalin scaffolds substituted by 3-oxopropanol side chains, and shown low inhibitory activity against 6×His-tagged recombinant human aldose reductase. Here, we report the isolation and structural elucidation of compounds 1–8 based on the studies of their NMR, EI-MS, and ECD spectra.

Figure 1.

The chemical structures of compounds 1–8.

2. Results and Discussion

Peaurantiogriseol A (1, Figure 1) was obtained as a colorless solid and had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₆O₃ as determined by HREIMS data (observed m/z 266.1878 M⁺, calculated 266.1876), requiring 4° of unsaturation. The ¹³C-NMR and DEPT spectra (Table 1) indicated the presence of a carbonyl group (δ 215.4), two olefinic carbons, four sp³ CH₂ groups, five sp³ CH groups, one sp³ quaternary carbon atom, and three methyl groups. The ¹H-NMR and ¹H–¹H COSY spectra (Table 1 and Figure 2) showed the signals of a 3-oxopropanol system (δ_H 3.82/2.64), and a cis double bond signals (δ_H 5.91 d J = 10.6 Hz; 5.58 ddd J =10.6, 4.8, 2.4 Hz). The remaining 2° of unsaturation supported a decalin segment in 1. In the HMBC spectrum (Figure 2), rich correlation data allowed us to unambiguously establish the locations of substituents on the decalin ring. A methyl singlet at δ_H 1.19 correlated with C-3 and C-5 respectively, which revealed that the methyl group, with the 3-oxopropanol side chain, was located at C-4 position. A methyl doublet signals at δ_H 0.75 (J = 8.4 Hz) correlated with C-13 and C-12, and another methyl doublet signals at δ_H 1.00 (J = 9.6 Hz) correlated with C-9 and C-7, revealing that the two methyl groups were located at C-8 and C-13 positions, respectively. Based on the HMBC correlations of H-11/C-9 and H-12/C-14, the cis double bond was easily assigned as C-11 and C-12. One hydroxyl group was identified at C-9 position based on the chemical shift of CH-9 (δ 2.89/79.3) and HMBC correlations.

Table 1.

¹H and ¹³C NMR data of compounds 1–5 (400/100 MHz in CDCl₃, J in Hz).

	1 α		2		3		4		5
	13C	1H	13C	1H	13C	1H	13C	1H	13C	1H
1	58.0 t	3.82 m	57.9 t	3.80 m	58.2 t	3.82 m	58.4 t	3.82 m	61.2 t	4.08 dd 12.0, 8.0
										3.87 dt 12.0, 2.8
2	41.0 t	2.64 ddd 18.6, 6.6, 4.2	41.0 t overlapped	2.68 ddd 18.4, 6.0, 4.8	40.9 t	2.66 q 4.4	44.1 t	3.11 ddd 18.8, 6.4, 3.6	39.5 t	2.79 ddd 14.0, 12.8, 8.0
		2.63 ddd 18.6, 6.6, 4.2		2.61 ddd 18.4, 6.0, 4.8				2.67 ddd 18.8, 6.4, 3.6		2.19 ddd 14.0, 12.8, 8.0
3	215.4 s		215.6 s		215.8 s		216.1 s		212.6 s
4	52.3 s		52.3 s		52.4 s		57.2 s		57.1 s
5	45.3 d	1.66 m	39.0 d	1.59 m	38.7 d	1.58 m	43.3 d	1.78 m	43.0 d	2.23 m
6	26.8 t	1.54 m	26.7 t	1.68 m	23.0 t	1.53 m	23.1 t	1.42 m	25.8 t	1.14 m
		0.91 m		0.91 m		1.26 m		1.31 m
7	33.5 t	1.16 m,	29.8 t	1.80 m	45.8 t	1.71 m	39.5 t	1.67 m	29.6 t	1.83 m
		1.71 m		1.08 m		1.27 m		1.50 m		1.02 m
8	41.0 d	1.36 m	41.0 d overlapped	1.58 m	70.2 s		70.1 s		40.8 d	1.62 m
9	79.3 d	2.89 t 9.6	36.3 t	1.84 m	39.7 t	1.65 m	45.3 t	1.74 m	35.4 t	1.94 m
				0.86 m		1.53 m		1.25 m		1.03 m
10	36.6 d	1.67 m	37.9 d	1.69 m	33.6 d	2.13 m	33.7 d	2.24 tt 11.8, 2.8	37.4 d	1.82 m
11	125.0 d	5.91 d 10.6	129.6 d	5.32 d 10.0	129.6 d	5.32 d 9.6	131.0 d	5.34, s	134.3 d	5.66 dd 9.6, 1.2
12	130.6 d	5.58 ddd 10.6, 4.8, 2.4	129.7 d	5.45 ddd 10.0, 4.8, 2.4	130.0 d	5.52 ddd 9.6, 4.8, 2.8	133.6 d	5.34, s	130.6 d	5.52 dd 9.6, 2.8
13	39.5 d	2.01 m	39.9 d	2.06 m	40.0 d	2.09 m	74.0 s		78.5 s
14	18.6 q	0.75 d 8.4	18.7 q	0.72 d 7.2	18.8 q	0.75 d 7.2	27.5 q	1.13 s	20.5 q	1.18 s
15	17.5 q	1.19 s	17.4 q	1.17 s	17.7 q	1.22 s	12.1 q	1.33 s	11.2 q	0.88 s
16	18.7 q	1.00 d 9.6	68.3 t	3.44 dd 10.8, 6.4	31.8 q	1.22 s	31.8 q	1.25 s	68.3 t	3.48 m
				3.41 dd 10.8, 6.4

The data were recorded at ^α 600 MHz (¹H-NMR) and 150 MHz (¹³C-NMR).

Figure 2.

The key ¹H–¹H COSY and HMBC correlations of compounds 1–5.

The relative stereochemistry of 1 was established by its NOESY spectrum (Figure 3). The NOE correlations of H-15/H-10, H-15/H-13 and H-14/H-5 confirmed a trans-fused decalin ring in 1. Methyl-15 and OH-9 were oriented on the same side of the decalin ring, and methyl-14 and methyl-16 were oriented on the other side based on the NOE correlations of H-8/H-10 and H-16/H-9.

Figure 3.

The key NOE correlations of compounds 1–6.

The absolute configuration of 1 was determined by comparison of the ¹H-NMR spectra of corresponding (R) and (S)-Mosher esters (Figure 4; Supplementary Materials Table S2). OH-1 of compound 1 was mainly esterified by S/R-MTPA-Cl based on the larger chemical shift of H-1. There was an esterified C-1 hydroxyl group in Mosher esters of 1, which were confirmed by their ¹⁹F NMR spectra that showed 2 CF₃ signals (Supplementary Materials Figure S8). The preferred conformations of Mosher esters of 1 dominating ¹H NMR spectroscopic features were that the 3-oxopropanol side chains with MTPA moiety were in equatorial position, and bend to C-13 position; CH₂-1–O–C=O–CF₃ substructure of Mosher esters of 1 were coplanar (Figure 4). The shielding or deshielding effects of the phenyl rings of MTPA moiety on H-13 or H-14 were larger in its R-Mosher ester than that of S-Mosher ester. The absolute configuration of C-13 in 1 was deduced as S-configuration based on the positive chemical shift differences (Δδ^SR) of H-13 and negative chemical shift differences (Δδ^SR) of H-14 from corresponding Mosher esters [6,7]. Finally, the absolute configuration of 1 was confirmed as (4S,5S,8S,9R,10R,13S)-configuration (Figure 1) based. The absolute configuration of 1 was validated by the result that the experimental data and calculated ECD spectrum for (4S,5S,8S,9R,10R,13S)-configuration of 1 matched exactly (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

(A) Chemical shift difference values (Δδ^SR = δ^S − δ^R, in Hz) of compounds 1/2 esterified by S/R-MTPA-Cl; and (B) preferred conformations of S/R-Mosher esters of 1/2.

Figure 5.

Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 1–6.

Peaurantiogriseol B (2, Figure 1) was obtained as a white solid and had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₆O₃ based on HREIMS data (observed m/z 266.1875 M⁺, calculated 266.1876), same as compound 1. The ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR spectra of 2 were very similar to those of 1 (Table 1), except for the absence of one oxygenated CH-9 group signal, and the change of a doublet signal at δ 1.00/18.7 to hydroxymethyl signals at δ 3.44/3.41/68.3. These results suggested the presence on compound 2 of a hydroxymethyl group at C-16 position. The ¹H-¹H COSY and HMBC correlations of 2 were also similar to those of 1 (Figure 2), which confirmed that an OH group was located at C-16.

The relative stereochemistry of 2 was established by its NOESY spectrum (Figure 3). Its NOE data were very similar to those of 1. A trans-fused decalin ring in 2 was indicated by the correlations of H-15/H-13, H-15/H-10, and H-14/H-5. Methyl-15 and methyl-14 were oriented on the opposite side, and hydroxymethyl-16 and methyl-14 were oriented on the same side based on the NOE correlation of H-16/H-5.

The absolute configuration of 2 was determined by comparison of the ¹H-NMR spectra of its (R) and (S)-Mosher esters like compound 1. Both alcohols (OH-1 and OH-16) in 2 were esterified based on the larger chemical shifts of H-1/H-16 (Supplementary Materials Table S2), which were confirmed based on its ¹⁹F NMR spectra (Supplementary Materials, Figure 13S); there were 3 CF₃ signals in ¹⁹F NMR spectra of Mosher esters of 2. The ¹H NMR spectroscopic features and preferred conformations of Mosher esters of 2 were the same as that of 1. Therefore, the absolute configuration of 2 was confirmed as (4S,5S,8S,10R,13S)-configuration (Figure 1). The absolute configuration of 2 was validated by the result that the experimental data and calculated ECD spectrum for (4S, 5S, 8S, 10R, 13S)-configuration of 2 matched exactly (Figure 5).

Peaurantiogriseol C (3, Figure 1) was obtained as a white solid and had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₆O₃ based on HREIMS data (observed m/z 248.1770 [M − H₂O]⁺, calculated for C₁₆H₂₄O₂, 248.1771). The ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR spectra of 3 were very similar to those of compound 2 (Table 1), except for the changes of hydroxymethyl signals at δ 3.41/68.3 to a methyl singlet at δ 1.22/31.0 in 3, and CH group signals at δ 1.58/41.0 to quaternary carbon atom signal at δ 70.2 in 3. These results suggested that compound 3 possesses a hydroxyl group at C-8 position, which were confirmed by the HMBC correlations from H-16 to C-7, and H-16 to C-9 (Figure 2). The relative stereochemistry of 3 was the same as compound 2 based of its NOESY spectrum (Figure 3). The absolute configuration of compound 3 was determined by the result that the experimental data, showing a negative Cotton effect at 291 nm, and calculated ECD spectrum for (4S,5S,8S,10R,13S)-configuration of 3 matched exactly (Figure 5).

Peaurantiogriseol D (4, Figure 1) had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₆O₄ based on HREIMS data (observed m/z 282.1824 M⁺, calculated 282.1826), with one more oxygen atom than compound 3. The ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, ¹H–¹H COSY, and HMBC correlations of 4 were very similar to those of 3 (Table 1, Figure 2), except for the change of a methyl doublet signal at δ 0.75 (d, J = 7.2 Hz) to singlet signal at δ 1.13 in 4, which suggested that compound 4 had an added OH group. The additional OH group was located at C-13 based on the chemical shift of CH-13 (δ_c 74.0) and HMBC correlations. The relative stereochemistry of 4 was established based on the result that the interatomic non-bonded distance of key atoms and NOESY correlation signals matched exactly in its 3D model (Table 2, Me-eea-trans conformer). The relative stereochemistry of 4 was assigned as that methyl-14 and methyl-15 were equatorial; methyl-16 was axial; and the decalin ring was trans based on the interatomic non-bonded distance of key atoms less than 4 Å. The trans-fused decalin ring of 4 was supported by the coupling constant of CH-10 signal (tt, J = 11.8, 2.8 Hz). The absolute configuration of 4 was confirmed as (4R,5S,8S,10R,13R)-conformer by the result that the experimental data, showing a negative Cotton effect at 298 nm, and calculated ECD spectrum for (4R,5S,8S,10R,13R)-conformer of 4 matched exactly (Figure 5).

Table 2.

The key NOE correlations of compound 4 and interatomic non-bonded distance of the key atoms in its main 3D conformers.

Key Atoms	NOE Correlation	Main 3D Conformers
		Me-aaa-Cis	Me-eee-Cis	Me-eea-Trans
		Distance (Å)	Distance(Å)	Distance(Å)
CH3-14	H-5	3.347715	4.256464	3.471439
CH3-15	H-10	3.608014	2.503497	1.862233
CH3-16	H-10	2.310649	5.322337	1.826166
CH3-14	H-2	5.109479	4.964076	2.470492
CH-5	H-10	2.265362	2.503497	3.087856

Me-aaa-cis conformer: methyl-14, methyl-15, and methyl-16 are axial, decalin ring is cis, hypothetically; Me-eee-cis conformer: methyl-14, methyl-15, and methyl-16 are equatorial, decalin ring is cis, hypothetically; Me-eea-trans conformer: methyl-14 and methyl-15 are equatorial, and methyl-16 is axial, decalin ring is trans, hypothetically.

Peaurantiogriseol E (5, Figure 1) had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₄O₃ based on HREIMS data (observed m/z 264.1721 M⁺, calculated 264.1720), which was two mass units less than that of compound 2, requiring 5 degrees of unsaturation. The ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data for 5 were similar to those of compound 2 (Table 1). The most obvious difference between 5 and 2 was that the absence of one CH group signal at δ 2.06/39.9, and the change of a doublet signal at δ 0.72 to singlet at δ 1.18/20.5 in 5. These results suggested that a pyrone moiety was formed in 5 by an O–C bond at C-13 position, which was supported by the HMBC correlations from H-1 to C-13 (Figure 2), and, from H-2 to C-4.

The relative stereochemistry of 5 was established by its NOESY spectrum (Figure 3). A cis-fused decalin ring in 5 was confirmed based on the NOE correlations of H-15/H-10, H-14/H-5, and H-15/H-14. Methyl-14, methyl-15, and hydroxymethyl-16 were oriented on the same side by the NOE correlations between H-16 and H-10. The absolute configuration of 5 was determined based on the result that the experimental ECD spectrum, showing a negative Cotton effect at 298 nm, and calculated ECD spectrum for (4R,5R,8R,10R,13S)-configuration of compound 5 matched exactly (Figure 5).

Peaurantiogriseol F (6, Figure 1) had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₆O₄ based on HRESIMS data (observed m/z 283.18999 [M + H]⁺, calculated for C₁₆H₂₆O₄, 283.19039 [M + H]⁺), with the same planar structure as that of known craterellone D based on its spectroscopic data (Supplementary Materials Table S1) [8]. The ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ of compound 6 was +21 (c 2.2, MeOH) with opposite sign of craterellone D. The NOE correlations of H-14/H-15, H-14/H-5, H-14/H-10, H-15/H-5, and H-15/H-10 allowed us to unambiguously establish a cis-fused decalin ring in 6 different from the trans junction of craterellone D. Hydroxymethyl-16 were oriented on the opposite side of methyl-14/methyl-15 based on the NOE correlation of H-8/H-10. Compound 6 is a diastereoisomer of craterellone D. The absolute configuration of 6 was determined based on the result that the experimental ECD spectrum, showing a negative Cotton effect at 296 nm, and calculated ECD spectrum for (4S,5S,8R,10S,13R)-configuration of 6 matched exactly (Figure 5).

Compound 7 was identified as aspermytin A by comparison of its spectral data with [9]; both compound 7 and aspermytin A had the same NMR, MS and specific rotation data.

The structure of compound 8 (Figure 1) was also elucidated by its spectroscopic data (Supplementary Materials Table S1). Its ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ was −29 (c 2.1, MeOH). Its trans-fused decalin ring was determined based on the NOE correlations of H-14/H-5 and H-15/H-10; its methyl-14 and hydroxyl-9 were oriented on the opposite side of methyl-15 and methyl-16 by the NOE correlations of H-15/H-10, H-16/H-10, and H-16/H-9. It was found that the planar structure of compound 8 was the same as that of known 1-propanone, 3-hydroxy-1-(1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-2,5-dihydroxy-1,2,6-trimethyl-1-naphthalenyl), CAS Registry Number 1235005-17-0. No reference, nor stereochemical information are presented in SciFinder.

Compounds 1−8, at a concentration of 50 mM, showed low inhibitory effect against human aldose reductase; the corresponding value of percent inhibition were 16%, 6%, 31%, 22%, 26%, 2%, 13%, and 9%. The compounds showed no activity of inducing neurite outgrowth (PC-12) [9], nor antimicrobial activity against E. coli. (ATCC 25922), Staphylococcu aureus (ATCC 25923), and Candida albicans (ATCC 60193), at a concentration of 128 μg/mL.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

(R)-(−)-α-Methoxy-α-trifluoromethylphenylacetyl chloride (MTPA-Cl) (99%), (S)-(+)-MTPA-Cl (99%), dimethyl sulfoxide, and pyridine-d₅ (99.5%) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). 6×His-tagged recombinant human aldose reductase was presented by Xiaopeng Hu, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University [10]; its substrate, β-NADPH were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); methanol was HPLC grade; other reagents were analytical grade and commercially available; PDA medium were purchased from Beijing Land Bridge Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.

Optical rotation measurements were carried out using a Bellingham-Stanley 37–440 polarimeter (Bellingham Stanley Ltd., Kent, UK). UV spectra were determined using a UV-240 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). ECD spectra were measured using a Chirascan Circular Dichroism Spectrometer (Applied PhotoPhysics, Surrey, UK). IR spectra were measured on a TENSOR37 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). The ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data were acquired using a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz for ¹H nuclei and 100 MHz for ¹³C nuclei, a Bruker Avance III 500 MHz NMR spectrometer at 470 MHz for ¹⁹F nuclei, and a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer at 600 MHz for ¹H nuclei and 150 MHz for ¹³C nuclei (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, German). TMS was used as an internal standard, and the chemical shifts (δ) were expressed in ppm or Hz. The EI mass spectra and high-resolution mass spectra were obtained using MAT95XP (ThermoFinnigan, Bremen, Germany) high resolution mass spectrometer and a LTQ-Orbitrap LC-MS (Thermo Fisher, Frankfurt, German). HPLC was performed using a 515 pump with a UV 2487 detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and an Ultimate XB-C-18 column (250 mm × 10 mm, 5 μm; Welch, MD, USA). Normal pressure preparative column chromatography was carried out on RP-18 gel (25–40 μm, Daiso Inc., Osaka, Japan), silica gel (200–400 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., Qingdao, China), or Sephadex-LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Stockholm, Sweden) for reverse and direct phase elution modes, respectively. TLC was performed over F₂₅₄ glass plates (Qingdao Marine Chemical Inc., Qingdao, China) and analyzed under UV light (254 and 366 nm).

3.2. Fungal Material

Endophytic fungus Penicillium aurantiogriseum 328# was isolated with PDA medium from the bark of Hibiscus tiliaceus collected in the Qi’ao Mangrove Nature Reserve of Guangdong Province, China and identified according to its morphological characteristics and the ITS region [11]. A voucher specimen is deposited in our laboratory at −20 °C.

3.3. Fermentation, Extraction and Isolation

Small agar slices bearing mycelia were placed in 1000 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing rice medium (composed of 60 g rice, 80 mL distilled water, and 0.24 g sea salt); and incubated for 30 days at 28 °C. In total, 120 flasks of culture were obtained. Cultures were extracted with EtOAc. In total, 200 g crude extract was obtained by evaporation of EtOAc. The crude extract was suspended in H₂O (2 L) and partitioned with n-hexane (3 L × 2) and EtOAc (3 L × 2) to give n-hexane (90 g) and EtOAc (51 g) extracts, respectively.

The EtOAc extract was subjected to silica gel column, eluted with n-hexane–EtOAc gradient (from 100:0 to 0:100) to obtain six fractions (Frs. 1–6). Fr. 2 (7.5 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel, eluted with n-hexane–EtOAc (50:50) to obtain three fractions (Frs. 2.1–2.3). Frs. 2.1 and Frs. 2.2 were purified by Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) to yield compound 1 (67.5 mg) and compound 7 (1.007 g), respectively; Fr. 2.3 was separated by HPLC (MeOH-H₂O, 20:80, 2 mL/min, 254 nm) to isolate compound 5 (6 mg). Fr. 3 (4.5 g) was purified using a Sephadex LH-20 column (MeOH) and separated by HPLC (MeOH-H₂O gradient from: 25:75 to 50:50, 2 mL/min, 254 nm) to yield compound 3 (40 mg) and compound 2 (45 mg). Fr. 4 (7.7g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel, eluted with n-hexane–EtOAc (40:69) to obtain two fractions, Fr. 5.1 and Fr. 5.2. Fr. 5.1 purified using Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) to yield compound 6 (206 mg); and Fr. 5.2 was separated by HPLC (MeOH-H₂O, 20:80, 2 mL/min, 254 nm) to yield compound 4 (4 mg) and compound 8 (27.1 mg).

3.4. Spectral Data

Peaurantiogriseol A (1): colorless solid; ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ +73 (c 1.5, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (logε) 240 (2.4) nm; ECD (MeOH) Δε₂₄₉ −0.36; IR (KBr) ν_max 3425, 1703 cm⁻¹; for ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data, see Table 1; EIMS m/z 266 (M⁺), 248, 217, 203, 193; HREIMS m/z 266.1878 [M⁺] (calculated for C₁₆H₂₆O₃, 266.1876).

Peaurantiogriseol B (2): colorless solid; ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ +89 (c 1.7, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (logε) 240 (3.1) nm; ECD (MeOH) Δε₂₄₉ −0.49; IR (KBr) ν_max 3431, 1701 cm⁻¹; for ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data, see Table 1; EIMS m/z 266 [M⁺]; HREIMS m/z 266.1875 [M⁺] (calculated for C₁₆H₂₆O₃, 266.1876).

Peaurantiogriseol C (3): colorless solid; ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ +60 (c 0.5, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (logε) 250 (2.1) nm; ECD (MeOH) Δε₂₉₁ −0.21; IR (KBr) ν_max 3434, 1701 cm⁻¹; for ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data, see Table 1; EIMS m/z 248 (M-H₂O)⁺, 206, 175; HREIMS m/z 248.1770 [M − H₂O]⁺ (calculated for C₁₆H₂₄O₂, 248.1771).

Peaurantiogriseol D (4): white solid; ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ +18 (c 0.4, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (logε) 282 (2.6) nm; ECD (MeOH) Δε₂₉₈ −0.88; IR (KBr) ν_max 3434, 1688 cm⁻¹; for ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data, see Table 1; EIMS m/z 282 [M⁺]; HREIMS m/z 282.1824 [M⁺] (calculated for C₁₆H₂₆O₄, 282.1826).

Peaurantiogriseol E (5): colorless solid; ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ −153 (c 1.5, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (logε) 282 (2.0) nm; ECD (MeOH) Δε₂₉₈ −2.5; IR (KBr) ν_max 3470, 1686 cm⁻¹; for ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data, see Table 1; EIMS m/z 264 [M⁺], 249, 231, 192; HREIMS m/z 264.1721 [M⁺] (calculated for C₁₆H₂₄O₃, 264.1720).

Peaurantiogriseol F (6): white solid; ${[\alpha ]}_{\text{D}}^{25}$ +21 (c 2.2, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (logε) 289 (1.9) nm; ECD (MeOH) Δε₂₉₆ −1.61; for ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR data, see Supplementary Materials table S1; EIMS m/z 282 (M⁺), 264, 249, 203, 173; HRESIMS m/z 283.18999 [M + H]⁺ (calculated for C₁₆H₂₇O₄, 283.19039 [M + H]⁺).

3.5. Computational Analyses

All the theoretical methods and the basis set used for optimization and spectrum calculation were recommended in previous studies [12,13]. All the theoretical calculations, including geometry optimization, frequency analysis, and ECD spectrum prediction, were carried out with the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) methods in the Gaussian 09 software package [14]. The geometry optimizations were performed at the B3LYP/6-31+G (d) level in the gas phase. Based on the final optimized structure, the ECD spectra were calculated at the PBE1PBE-SCRF/6-311++g (d, p) level using the PCM solvent continuum models with methanol as a solvent. The theoretical predicted ECD spectra were fitted in the SpecDis software package.

3.6. Esterification Procedure

The Mosher esters of compounds 1 and 2 were prepared by treatment of compounds 1 and 2 with corresponding (R)-(−)-α-methoxy-α-trifluoromethylphenylacetyl chloride (1.5 equivalence ratio), or (S)-(+)-α-methoxy-α-trifluoromethylphenylacetyl chloride (1.5 equivalence ratio) in pyridine-d₅ under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixtures were stood at room temperature for 3.5 h. Then, ¹H NMR spectra of the samples were recorded at 400 MHz.

3.7. Inhibition of Aldose Reductase

The method to examine the inhibition of aldose reductase was similar to the method used by Michael C. Van Zandt et al. [15]. Enzyme activity was measured by monitoring the rate of disappearance of NADPH at 340 nm. The reaction contents in a final volume of 300 μL were 6.6% w/v (NH₄)₂SO₄, 33 mM NaH₂PO4 (pH 6.6), 0.11 mM NADPH, 4.7 mM dl-glyceraldehyde, 0.59 μg of enzyme, 1% DMSO, and compound. Each assay was done in triplicate. Percent inhibition was calculated on the basis of enzyme activity in the presence or absence of compound.

4. Conclusions

Polyketide decalin-derived secondary metabolites are widely found in nature [16,17,18]; Abundant polyketide decalin derivatives (1–8) from endophytic fungus 328# from the mangrove in the South China Sea were reported in this work; their absolute configurations were established by theoretical calculations of electronic circular dichroism and NMR data analyses of Mosher ester derivatives. Compounds 1–8 showed low activity under our experimental conditions.

Author Contributions

Jun Wang and Lan Liu took charge of the throughout the research, structural elucidation and writing. Yanhong Ma mainly took part in the extraction and isolation. Jing Li mainly took part in the computational analyses and biological activity assay. Meixiang Huang mainly took part in the data test. Yongcheng Lin mainly checked the error about structures elucidation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.