Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 30;5:15927. doi: 10.1038/srep15927

Topological Superfluid and Majorana Zero Modes in Synthetic Dimension

Zhongbo Yan 1,2, Shaolong Wan 2, Zhong Wang 1,3,a
PMCID: PMC4626860  PMID: 26515084

Abstract

Recently it has been shown that multicomponent spin-orbit-coupled fermions in one-dimensional optical lattices can be viewed as spinless fermions moving in two-dimensional synthetic lattices with synthetic magnetic flux. The quantum Hall edge states in these systems have been observed in recent experiments. In this paper we study the effect of an attractive Hubbard interaction. Since the Hubbard interaction is long-range in the synthetic dimension, it is able to efficiently induce Cooper pairing between the counterpropagating chiral edge states. The topological class of the resultant one-dimensional superfluid is determined by the parity (even/odd) of the Chern number in the two-dimensional synthetic lattice. We also show the presence of a chiral symmetry in our model, which implies Z classification and the robustness of multiple zero modes when this symmetry is unbroken.


Topological superconductors and topological superfluids hosting Majorana zero modes1,2,3,4,5,6,7 have been among the central themes of both condensed matter and cold atom physics recently. (“Topological superconductor” refers to charged particles, while “topological superfluid” refers to neutral particles, otherwise their physics is essentially the same. The result of our paper is equally applicable to topological superconductors and topological superfluids.) Apart from being novel phases of matter, they have potential applications in quantum computation8,9. It is therefore highly desirable to search for various routes towards realization of topological superconductivity/superfluidity and Majorana zero modes. There have been several proposals to realize them in either condensed matter10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 or cold atom systems20,21,22,23. The latter systems have the advantage of high controllability. Experimental study on topological superconductors and Majorana zero modes is also extremely active24,25,26,27,28.

In this paper we study the Cooper pairing between chiral edge modes of quantum Hall strips as a possible route toward one-dimensional (1D) topological superconductors and topological superfluids. This is stimulated by the idea of “synthetic dimension”29,30 emerging from optical lattice with atoms with large spin31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42. In this visualization, internal degrees of freedom (“spin”) form an additional spatial dimension. This picture is especially convenient when the internal states are coupled sequentially, as can be readily done by two Raman beams29. Synthetic magnetic flux naturally exists inside the two-dimensional (one physical dimension plus one synthetic dimension) lattice, and the quantum Hall states (Chern insulator) can be simulated. The chiral edge modes have been observed in recent experiments43,44. The two counterpropagating chiral modes are separated in the synthetic dimension, therefore they are immune to backscattering if the scatters are short-range.

The interaction effect in this system is an important issue29,45,46,47, both experimentally and theoretically. With the motivation of realizing topological superfluidity, in this paper we study the effect of an attractive Hubbard interaction, which is long-range in the synthetic dimension, though short-range in the physical dimension. As a consequence, the two counterpropagating chiral edge modes can be Cooper-paired efficiently. We find that topological superfluidity naturally arises. We also study the existence of topological Majorana zero modes. Interestingly, multiple zero modes are stable if a chiral symmetry of our model is unbroken.

Results

The model and main picture

The system in consideration is illustrated in Fig. 1. The one-dimensional optical lattice extends in the x direction, and the Raman-induced hopping couples Inline graphic spin states at each site x in a sequential manner (F = 5/2 is shown in Fig. 1). Therefore, the system acquires a “synthetic dimension”29. The Hamiltonian is Inline graphic, in which the free part is

Figure 1. Sketch of the system.

Figure 1

The spin states are coupled sequentially by Raman-induced hopping, which generates a synthetic dimension, in addition to the physical dimension x.

graphic file with name srep15927-m3.jpg

where Inline graphic29, with Ω depending on the strength of Raman transitions. Generally, the value of Ωm can be controlled by tuning Raman beams. Our results will be insensitive to details of Ωm. The above Hamiltonian is readily realizable in experiment43,44. The presence of Inline graphic indicates that there is a flux γ in each plaquette, which is responsible for the emergence of the chiral edge states in this model(see Fig. (1)). After a gauge transformation Inline graphic, H0 becomes

graphic file with name srep15927-m7.jpg

in which the hopping gains a spin-dependent phase factor.

In this paper we take the simple yet realistic SU(M)-invariant Hubbard interaction:

graphic file with name srep15927-m8.jpg

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic. This interaction is apparently long-range in the synthetic dimension, thus it is quite capable of pairing the counterpropagating modes at the opposite edges (near Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively) in the synthetic dimension.

Before proceeding to a quantitative study of HI, we would like to discuss the physical picture of possible topological superfluidity in this model. Since the hopping lacks translational symmetry along the synthetic dimension, the bulk Chern number as an integral of Berry curvature in the two-dimensional Brillouin zone cannot be defined, however, its manifestation as the number of chiral edge modes is well-defined. Suppose that the “bulk Chern number” C = 1, i.e. there is a single pair of chiral edge modes in the bulk gap [see Fig. 2, in which the purple dotted lines intersect with the chiral modes]. If there is a small Cooper pairing between these two edge modes, the system is a one-dimensional topological superfluid. This can be inferred using Kitaev’s Z2 topological invariant2, which essentially counts the parity (even/odd) of the number of Fermi points within Inline graphic in the absence of pairing. In the case Inline graphic, i.e. there are two pairs of chiral edge modes, as illustrated by the curves intersecting with the blue dotted line in Fig. (2b), the superfluid resulting from pairing the edge states is topologically trivial. Provided that the pairing is small, the superfluid (or superconductor) is nontrivial(trivial) when the bulk Chern number is odd(even), namely,

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The spectrum of free Hamiltonian H0 for (a) F = 5/2, t = 1, Ω = 0.1, γ = π/3. The dotted line is located at Inline graphic; and (b) Inline graphic, t = 1, Ω = 0.1, Inline graphic. The purple dotted line is located at Inline graphic, and the blue dotted line is located at Inline graphic.

graphic file with name srep15927-m15.jpg

where Inline graphic (mod 2) is the Z2 topological number of 1D superconductor or superfluid2. In the rest part of this paper we shall present a quantitative study of the picture outlined above.

Cooper pairing in self-consistent mean-field

At the mean-field level the Hubbard interaction can be decomposed as

graphic file with name srep15927-m17.jpg

where we have defined Inline graphic, which satisfies Inline graphic because of Fermi statistics. The mean field BdG Hamiltonian becomes

graphic file with name srep15927-m20.jpg

Since the basic physics is the pairing of chiral edge modes with opposite momenta, it is natural to consider Cooper pairing with zero total momentum, namely that Inline graphic is independent of n. We determine these Inline graphic self-consistently. Whenever there are several sets of self-consistent solutions of Inline graphic, we compare their mean-field energies and pick up the ground state. This calculation can be carried out for all possible values of F. Hereafter we take F = 7/2 as an example.

The pairings as functions of Hubbard U are shown in Fig. (3) for two values of chemical potential μ. In Fig. (3a) we take Inline graphic, which corresponds to bulk Chern number C = 1 [see the purple dotted line in Fig. (2b)]. For small Inline graphic, as Inline graphic increases, Inline graphic grows exponentially. For U not too large, Inline graphic dominates other pairings, which is consistent with the picture of pairing between chiral edge modes. At a critical Inline graphic slightly below 2.5, the system undergoes a first-order transition to a phase in which Inline graphic, which should be regarded as a “bulk pairing”, becomes comparable to the edge pairing. Thus the edge-pairing picture becomes inaccurate at large Inline graphic. In Fig. (3b) a different chemical potential Inline graphic is taken, and the edge-state pairings again dominate at small Inline graphic.

Figure 3. The self-consistent solutions of Cooper pairing Inline graphic as functions of U for (a) μ1  = −1.8; (b) μ2 = −0.95.

Figure 3

The parameters are t = 1, Ω = 0.1, and γ = π/3, which are the same as used in Fig. (2b).

To illustrate the robustness of the present picture, we study a set of quite different parameters, shown in Fig. (4). The behavior of pairings is qualitatively the same as that for the previous parameters.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) The spectrum without interaction for t = 1, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic. The dashed line marks Inline graphic. (b) The Cooper pairings as functions of U.

A few remarks are in order. First, although we have taken the strength of hopping along the synthetic dimension as Inline graphic, we have also checked that the result is qualitatively the same when it is m-independent. Second, when the 2D bulk is metallic, topological superfluidity can still emerge, though there is no clear criteria using Chern number. We shall not focus on details about this.

Majorana zero modes

The hallmark of 1D topological superconductor or superfluid is the emergence of topological zero modes localized near the two ends of an open chain.

We have solved the BdG mean-field Hamiltonian Eq.(6) for the wavefunction Inline graphic, in which Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the particle and hole component respectively. Below we present our solutions in a chain with sharp boundary, for the parameters t = 1, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, at both Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The Cooper pairings are taken to be the mean-field values at Inline graphic, which we obtained in the previous section. The case Inline graphic is shown in Fig. 5. There is one zero mode localized at each end of the open chain, and a tiny finite-size coupling mixes them slightly, though the energy splitting due to finite-size effect is too small to be discernable. The existence of a single Majorana zero modes at each end of an open chain is consistent with Eq.(4), the bulk Chern number being C = 1 (odd number) at Inline graphic. The superfluid is topologically nontrivial in this case.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) The wavefunction of a zero mode in an open chain with length N = 150. The parameters are Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The Cooper pairings are taken as Inline graphicInline graphic, Inline graphicInline graphic, which are the mean-field pairing obtained at Inline graphic ( see also Fig. (3a)). Other Inline graphic’s are much smaller and thus neglected. The two zero modes have the same profile of Inline graphic, thus only one is shown here. The inset shows a few energies near E = 0. (b) The zero mode solution with m resolution.

As a comparison, we also present the zero mode solutions at Inline graphic, for which the free Hamiltonian have two pairs of chiral edge modes (C = 2), indicating that the superfluid phase at small Inline graphic should be Z2 topologically trivial (see Eq.(4)). In the numerical calculation with open boundary condition, we find two Majorana zero modes at each end (see Fig. 6), which means that the superfluid is Z2 trivial. Therefore we see again that (−1)C determines the Z2 topological classification of the 1D superfluid in synthetic dimension.

Figure 6. The wavefunction of zero modes in an open chain with length N = 200.

Figure 6

The parameters are Inline graphic and Inline graphic, which is the same as Fig. 5 except for the chemical potential. The pairings are Inline graphic (the mean-field pairing at Inline graphic, and other pairing terms are much smaller and thus neglected. The spatial profile of Inline graphic of two of the four zero modes are shown in (a,b), while the profile with m resolution is shown in (c,d). The other two zero modes with the same profiles are not shown repeatedly. The inset of (a) shows several energies close to E = 0.

One may wonder why there is no hybridization between the two zero modes, which may open a gap for them. We shall explain the reason as follows. In fact, the BdG Hamiltonian has a time-reversal symmetry and a particle-hole symmetry, which can be combined into a chiral symmetry48. If the Cooper pairing Inline graphic are real, then we can check that the Hamiltonian satisfies

graphic file with name srep15927-m48.jpg

in which

graphic file with name srep15927-m49.jpg

This matrix is written in the BdG basis of Inline graphicT. Due to these symmetries, the BdG Hamiltonian can be classified as BDI48,49, whose classification in 1D is Z. The Z2 topologically trivial phase is nontrivial according to the Z classification of BDI class, which is the reason why zero modes appear at the edge of Z2 trivial states. We have checked that, if we break the symmetries, e.g. by giving a phase factor to Inline graphic (with other Inline graphics unchanged), then these zero modes will be shifted to nonzero energies.

According to Fidkowski and Kitaev’s work50, in the presence of interaction, the classification of BDI-class topological superconductors in 1D is Z8 instead of Z. Because of the flexible tunability to topological superconductors with large topological number (say 8) in our system, the Z8 classification can be tested experimentally. If we tune the bulk Chern number of our system to 8, the eight nominally-zero-modes will be shifted away from zero energy due to the (beyond-mean-field) interaction effects of the Hubbard term. If observed, this will be an experimental test of Fidkowski and Kitaev’s Z8 classification.

To make a closer connection to experiment, we also study the existence of Majorana zero modes in a system with soft boundary created by a harmonic trap V(x). In the presence of V(x), the chemical potential becomes Inline graphic. We take Inline graphic and Inline graphic, such that the center of the system is topologically nontrivial. Since Inline graphic is not constant, Inline graphic should also be x-dependent. To incorporate this effect, we numerically calculate the functions Inline graphic at Inline graphic, which is then used to produce the mean-field BdG Hamiltonian in harmonic trap. In the solution to this BdG Hamiltonian, the zero modes can be clearly seen, as shown in Fig. (7), though the quantitative details are different from the case of hard boundary.

Figure 7. Majorana zero modes in the harmonic trap.

Figure 7

The parameters are t = 1, Ω = 0.1, and Inline graphic, which are the same as used in Fig. (2b). The harmonic trap is Inline graphic, where x = 0 is the center of the chain with size N = 150. The two zero modes have the same profile of Inline graphic, thus we only show one. The inset of (a) shows several energies close to E = 0.

Conclusions and Discussions

We have studied the pairing between counterpropagating chiral edge modes in the quantum Hall strip in synthetic dimension. This picture has several merits. Creation of magnetic flux in the synthetic dimension by Raman beans is easier than in physical dimensions. The spatial separation of left and right moving chiral edge states in the synthetic dimension effectively prevents the backscattering between them, which implies their robustness. Meanwhile, the Hubbard interaction is not suppressed by this spatial separation: It is infinite-range in the synthetic dimension, therefore, it can pair the two edge modes quite efficiently. As we have shown, the resultant states are topological superfluid carrying Majorana zero modes. If the chiral symmetry of our model is unbroken, the classification is Z and multiple zero modes are stable; on the other hand, if this symmetry is broken, the classification is Z2.

Finally, we remark that quantum fluctuations of the phase factor of pairing in 1D is generally strong. One can put the 1D system in proximity to a 3D supefluid to suppress these fluctuations20. Moreover, it has been shown51,52 that long-range superconducting order is not a necessary condition for the existence of Majorana zero modes. The zero modes persist even when the long-range superconducting order is replaced by algebraic order (i.e. the correlations of pairings decay by power-law). In our system this conclusion applies.

Methods

Mean-field calculations

The mean-field calculation is carried out by the standard procedure of decomposing the Hubbard interaction as fermion bilinear terms, leading to Eq.(6). The Cooper pairing is calculated from Eq.(6) in a self-consistent manner. All self-consistent solutions for the Cooper pairing are obtained. In the case that there are more than one self-consistent solutions, the one with lowest mean-field energy is selected.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yan, Z. et al. Topological Superfluid and Majorana Zero Modes in Synthetic Dimension. Sci. Rep. 5, 15927; doi: 10.1038/srep15927 (2015).

Acknowledgments

We are especially grateful to Hui Zhai for stimulating discussions. This work is supported by NSFC under Grant No. 11304175, No.11275180, and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program.

Footnotes

Author Contributions The analytical calculation was done by Z.B.Y. and Z.W., and the numerical calculation was done by Z.B.Y. The project was designed by Z.W. All authors discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Read N. & Green D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. Kitaev A. Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  3. Qi X. L. & Zhang S. C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. Alicea J. New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beenakker C. W. J. Search for Majorana fermions in superconductors. Annu. Rev. Con. Mat. Phys. 4, 113 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilczek F. Majorana returns. Nat. Phys. 5, 614 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliott S. R. & Franz M. Colloquium: Majorana Fermions in nuclear, particle and solid-state physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 137 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kitaev A. Y. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  9. Nayak C., Simon S. H., Stern A., Freedman M. & Das Sarma S. Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu L. & Kane C. L. Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lutchyn R. M., Sau J. D. & Das Sarma S. Majorana Fermions and a Topological Phase Transition in Semiconductor-Superconductor Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oreg Y., Refael G. & von Oppen F. Helical Liquids and Majorana Bound States in Quantum Wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sau J. D., Lutchyn R. M., Tewari S. & Das Sarma S. Generic New Platform for Topological Quantum Computation Using Semiconductor Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040502 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tewari S., Das Sarma S., Nayak C., Zhang C. & Zoller P. Quantum Computation using Vortices and Majorana Zero Modes of a px + ipy Superfluid of Fermionic Cold Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010506 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Alicea J. Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125318 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Stanescu T. D., Lutchyn R. M. & Das Sarma S. Majorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 84, 144522 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Alicea J., Oreg Y., Refael G., von Oppen F. & Fisher M. P. A. Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks. Nat. Phys. 7, 412 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  18. Qi X. L., Hughes T. L. & Zhang S. C. Chiral topological superconductor from the quantum Hall state. Phys. Rev. B 82, 184516 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. Potter A. C. & Lee P. A. Multichannel Generalization of Kitaevs Majorana End States and a Practical Route to Realize Them in Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 227003 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiang L. et al. Majorana Fermions in Equilibrium and in Driven Cold-Atom Quantum Wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 220402 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang C., Tewari S., Lutchyn R. M. & Das Sarma S. px + ipy Superfluid from s-Wave Interactions of Fermionic Cold Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 160401 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sato M., Takahashi Y. & Fujimoto S. Non-Abelian Topological Order in s-Wave Superfluids of Ultracold Fermionic Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020401 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Diehl S., Rico E., Baranov M. A. & Zoller P. Topology by dissipation in atomic quantum wires. Nat. Phys. 7, 971 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  24. Mourik V. et al. Signatures of Majorana Fermions in Hybrid Superconductor-Semiconductor Nanowire Devices. Science 336, 1003 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nadj-Perge S. et al. Observation of Majorana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a superconductor. Science 346, 602 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Das A. et al. H. Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an AlCInAs nanowire topological superconductor as a signature of Majorana fermions. Nat. Phys. 8, 887 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang M. X. et al. The Coexistence of Superconductivity and Topological Order in the Bi2Se3 Thin Films. Science 336, 52 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Finck A. D. K. et al. Anomalous Modulation of a Zero-Bias Peak in a Hybrid Nanowire-Superconductor Device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 126406 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Celi A. et al. Synthetic gauge fields in synthetic dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043001 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Boada O., Celi A., Latorre J. I. & Lewenstein M. Quantum Simulation of an Extra Dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 133001 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gorshkov A. et al. Two-orbital SU(N) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms. Nat. Phys. 6, 289 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  32. Taie S. et al. Realization of a SU(2) × SU(6) System of Fermions in a Cold Atomic Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190401 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hara H., Takasu Y., Yamaoka Y., Doyle J. M. & Takahashi Y. Quantum Degenerate Mixtures of Alkali and Alkaline-Earth-Like Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 205304 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. DeSalvo B. J., Yan M., Mickelson P. G., Martinez de Escobar Y. N. & Killian T. C. Degenerate Fermi Gas of 87Sr. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 030402 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Scazza F. et al. Observation of two-orbital spin-exchange interactions with ultracold SU(N)-symmetric fermions Nat. Phys. 10, 779 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  36. Ho T. L. & Yip S. Pairing of Fermions with Arbitrary Spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 247 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu C. J., Hu J. P. & Zhang S. C. Exact SO(5) Symmetry in the Spin-3/2 Fermionic System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 186402 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu C. J. Hidden symmetry and quantum phases in spin-3/2 cold atomic systems. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 20, 1707 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  39. Lecheminant P., Boulat E. & Azaria P. Confinement and Superfluidity in One-Dimensional Degenerate Fermionic Cold Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 240402 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hermele M., Gurarie V. & Rey A. M. Mott Insulators of Ultracold Fermionic Alkaline Earth Atoms: Underconstrained Magnetism and Chiral Spin Liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 135301 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang X. et al. Spectroscopic observation of SU(N)-symmetric interactions in Sr orbital magnetism. Science 345, 1467 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Cazalilla M. A. & Rey A. M. Ultracold Fermi gases with emergent SU(N) symmetry. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 124401 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stuhl B. K., Lu H. I., Aycock L. M., Genkina D. & Spielman I. B. Visualizing edge states with an atomic Bose gas in the quantum Hall regime. Science 349, 1514–1518 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mancini M. et al. Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic Hall ribbons. Science 349, 1510–1513 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Barbarino S., Taddia L., Rossini D., Mazza L. & Fazio R. Magnetic crystals and helical liquids in alkaline-earth fermionic gases. Nat. Commun. 6, 8134 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ghosh S. K., Yadav U. K. & Shenoy V. B. Baryon squishing in synthetic dimensions by effective SU(M) gauge fields. arXiv: 1503.02301.
  47. Zeng T. S., Wang C. & Zhai H. Charge Pumping of Interacting Fermion Atoms in the Synthetic Dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 095302 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
  48. Ryu S., Schnyder A. P., Furusaki A. & Ludwig A. W. W. Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy. New. J. Phys. 12, 065010 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  49. Schnyder A. P., Ryu S., Furusaki A. & Ludwig A. W. W. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  50. Fidkowski L. & Kitaev A. Effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems. Phys. Rev. B 81, 134509 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  51. Fidkowski L., Lutchyn R. M., Nayak C. & Fisher M. P. A. Majorana zero modes in one-dimensional quantum wires without long-ranged superconducting order. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195436 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruhman J., Berg E. & Altman E. Topological States in a One-Dimensional Fermi Gas with Attractive Interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 100401 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES