Abstract
Rationale: Cognitive dysfunction has been demonstrated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but studies are limited to cross-sectional analyses or incompletely characterized populations.
Objectives: We examined longitudinal changes in sensitive measures of executive function in a well-characterized population of patients with severe COPD.
Methods: This study was performed on patients enrolled in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. To assess executive function, we analyzed trail making (TM) A and B times at enrollment in the trial (2,128 patients), and at 12 (731 patients) and 24 months (593 patients) after enrollment, adjusted for surgery, marriage status, age, education, income, depression, PaO2, PaCO2, and smoking. Associations with survival and hospitalizations were examined using Cox regression and linear regression models.
Measurements and Main Results: The average age of the patients was 66.4 years, and the average FEV1 was 23.9% predicted. At the time of enrolment, 38% had executive dysfunction. Compared with those who did not, these patients were older, less educated, had higher oxygen use, higher PaCO2, worse quality of life as measured by the St. George’s Respiratory Quotient, reduced well-being, and lower social function. There was no significant change over 2 years in TM A or B times after adjustment for covariables. Changes in TM B times were modestly associated with survival, but changes in TM B − A times were not. Changes in TM scores were not associated with frequency of hospitalization. Lung function, PaO2, smoking, survival, and hospitalizations were not significantly different in those with executive dysfunction.
Conclusions: In this large population of patients with severe emphysema and heavy cigarette smoking exposure, there was no significant decline over 2 years in cognitive executive function as measured by TM tests. There was no association between executive function impairment and frequency of hospitalization, and there was a possible modest association with survival. It is plausible that cerebrovascular comorbidities explain previously described cognitive pathology in COPD.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognition, executive function, hospitalization, survival
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex, multisystem disorder. The potential impact of COPD on cognitive ability has an emerging clinical relevance (1–3). Cognitive impairment has been demonstrated in cross-sectional studies of COPD, with moderate to severe impairment in up to 57% of patients hospitalized because of an exacerbation (1). Impairments are often global but most commonly involve executive functions, memory, and attention (4, 5). It has been suggested that impaired cognition may also be a predictor of mortality and disability in certain COPD populations (6, 7). Importantly, cognitive ability is critical for self-management and education, which underpin effective care (8). Understanding of the mechanisms that result in cognitive problems and their clinical impact remain incomplete in COPD.
Mild cognitive impairment has been shown in 36% of patients with moderate to severe COPD (vs. 12% in control subjects) (9). A self-reported diagnosis of COPD in mid-life has been found to be independently associated with subsequent cognitive impairment (hazard ratio, 1.85) (10). In addition, there appears to be a dose–response relationship between COPD duration of more than 5 years at baseline and risk of mild cognitive impairment (11).
Hypoxemia, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, sympathetic nervous system activation, accelerated aging, and autoimmunity are a selection of plausible pathophysiological mechanisms for brain pathology and cognitive dysfunction in COPD (12). COPD-related cerebrovascular damage has been implicated, with studies showing that impaired lung function is associated with cerebral white matter lesions (13, 14) and the presence of widespread white matter microstructural damage in stable COPD (15). In addition, COPD has been associated with cerebral microbleeds (a marker of cerebral small vessel disease) independent of smoking and cardiovascular risk (16).
In old age, cognitive functioning tends to decline substantially after hospitalization even after controlling for illness severity and prehospital cognitive decline (17). COPD exacerbations have been shown to be associated with myocardial injury and an increased risk of stroke (18, 19). In patients hospitalized with an acute COPD exacerbation, impaired cognitive function is associated with worse health status and longer hospital length of stay (1). We hypothesized that cognitive function would significantly decline over time and that this decline may be associated with disease severity, hospitalizations, and survival. Some of the results of this analysis have been previously reported in the form of an abstract (20).
Methods
The National Institutes of Health–sponsored National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) study protocol is described in detail elsewhere (21). In brief, participants with severe emphysema with no significant comorbid conditions that could interfere with completion of tests, therapy, or follow up were randomized to one of two procedures: lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or medical therapy (MT) after completion of a 6- to 10-week pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Trail making (TM) is a sensitive measure of executive function and closely predicts brain damage. Executive function impairment was defined from normative values as time taken to complete TM B of greater than102 seconds (22). Both TM A and B consist of 25 circles that are distributed over a sheet of paper (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Trail-making tests A and B.
In TM A, the circles are numbered from 1 to 25, and the subjects are asked to draw lines that connect the numbers in ascending order. In TM B, circles include both numbers (1–13) and letters (A–L) and are distributed across a sheet of paper. Subjects are asked to draw lines to connect the circles in an ascending sequence alternating between numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3-C). Subjects are instructed to work as quickly as they can, and the number of seconds to complete the task is the final score for each part. The TM B − A score (calculated as the difference between TM-A and TM-B times) is considered a measure of cognitive flexibility relatively independent of manual dexterity (23).
Analysis
Associations between baseline impairment (TM B > 102 s) and other baseline variables were explored using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables. We analyzed TM A and B over time at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months using repeated measures mixed models. Associations of baseline values with survival were explored using Cox proportional hazards models. The relationships between survival and changes in TM scores from baseline to Month 24 were explored using the survival time after Month 24. Survival time was counted from time of the 24-month TM evaluation until the end of the NETT study. The minimum and maximum follow-up time after Month 24 were 1 day and 48 months, respectively, with a median follow up of 18.3 months and a mean (SD) of 19.0 (10.8) months. Associations with hospitalizations and predictors of decline were examined using linear regression models. Relationships between hospitalization and changes in TM scores were modeled using the number of hospitalizations after Month 24. All of the models were adjusted for treatment (surgery vs. others), marital status (married vs. others), education (high school education or less vs. others), income (<$30,000 per year vs. ≥$30,000), age, Beck Depression Inventory, PaO2, PaCO2, and years smoked.
Results
Baseline Characteristics
Data were available for n = 1,218 subjects at baseline. A total of 731 (60%) subjects had TM data at Month 12, and 593 (49%) had data at Month 24. For the entire cohort of 1,218 subjects, mean age was 66.4 (±6.1) years, and FEV1% predicted was 23.9 (±6.5), consistent with severe airway obstruction. The NETT cohort were heavy smokers with a mean of 64.4 (±31.2) pack-years. Resting blood oxygen and carbon dioxide levels were in the normal range: PaO2 64.4 (±10.3) mm Hg, PaCO2 43.1 (±5.8) mm Hg, with 51% using supplementary oxygen and reporting a Medical Research Council dyspnea score of 4. Mean 6-minute-walking distance was 368.4 (±95) meters. A total of 51.9% of the cohort had received a high school education or less.
Average days in hospital after Month 24 was 1.5 (±4.7), and total number of deaths during follow up was 494 of 1,218 (41%). The 593 patients with TM data at Month 24 had better health at baseline than the patients without TM data. They had significantly lower Beck depression scores, their PaCO2 scores were about one point lower, and their baseline TM times were significantly lower (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics
Baseline Trail, B > 102 (N = 463) | Baseline Trail, B ≤ 102 (N = 755) | Total (N = 1,218) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Medical, yes | 230 (49.7%) | 380 (50.3%) | 610 (50.1%) | 0.8243 |
Married, yes | 306 (66.1%) | 483 (64.0%) | 789 (64.8%) | 0.4527 |
Age, mean (SD), yr | 67.8 (5.6) | 65.5 (6.3) | 66.4 (6.1) | <0.0001 |
High school education or less | 279 (60.3%) | 353 (46.8%) | 632 (51.9%) | <0.0001 |
Income < $30, 000 | ||||
Missing | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.0798 |
N (%) | 260 (56.5%) | 383 (51.3%) | 643 (53.3%) | |
MRC Scale: missing | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.3542 |
0 | 6 (1.3%) | 12 (1.6%) | 18 (1.5%) | |
1 | 3 (0.6%) | 1 (0.1%) | 4 (0.3%) | |
2 | 127 (27.5%) | 185 (24.5%) | 312 (25.7%) | |
3 | 92 (19.9%) | 170 (22.5%) | 262 (21.5%) | |
4 | 234 (50.6%) | 386 (51.2%) | 620 (51.0%) | |
Oxygen used at rest | 262 (56.6%) | 359 (47.5%) | 621 (51.0%) | 0.0022 |
Disability | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.0 (0.2) | 0.0 (0.2) | 0.6657 |
BDI | ||||
Mean (SD) | 3.9 (3.8) | 3.4 (3.5) | 3.6 (3.6) | 0.0138 |
Median | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
PaO2, mm Hg | ||||
N | 462 | 755 | 1217 | 0.2776 |
Mean (SD) | 64.0 (10.2) | 64.6 (10.3) | 64.4 (10.3) | |
PaCO2, mm Hg | ||||
N | 462 | 755 | 1217 | 0.0126 |
Mean (SD) | 43.6 (5.7) | 42.9 (5.9) | 43.1 (5.8) | |
Pre FEV1% predicted | ||||
N | 463 | 753 | 1216 | 0.6420 |
Mean (SD) | 23.8 (6.6) | 24.0 (6.5) | 23.9 (6.5) | |
Years smoked times cigarettes smoked per day | 1,300.0 (642.4) | 1,279.7 (612.2) | 1,287.4 (623.6) | 0.7900 |
6-min-walk distance, ft | 1,184.2 (319.8) | 1,223.6 (308.3) | 1,208.6 (313.2) | 0.0244 |
SGRQ total | 0.0156 | |||
N | 463 | 754 | 1217 | |
Mean (SD) | 54.1 (13.2) | 52.4 (12.3) | 53.1 (12.7) |
Definition of abbreviations: BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; MRC = Medical Research Council; SGRQ = St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.
Bold text indicates P < 0.02.
Executive Function at Baseline
Thirty-eight percent of patients had impaired executive function at baseline (TM B > 102 s). These individuals were statistically significantly older (67.8 vs. 65.5 yr, P < 0.001), had less education, higher Beck depression scores (mean difference of 0.5 points), higher St. George’s total scores (54.1 vs. 52.4, P = 0.016), were more likely to be using oxygen (56.6 vs. 47.5%, P = 0.002), had higher PaCO2 (43.6 mm Hg vs. 42.9 mm Hg, P = 0.013), shorter 6-minute-walking test distance (360 m vs. 373 m, P = 0.02), and worse mental well-being, emotional well-being, and social functioning (Table 1).
Longitudinal Change in Executive Function
With 593 patients having longitudinal data, this study had 80% power to detect a 2.1 change in TM A and a 4.3 change in TM B. Plots are shown using all patients (plots using only patients who have data at all three time points gave similar results; see online supplement).
TM A showed a reduction in time taken of about 4 seconds (improvement) over 2 years. TM B and TM B − A show an increase in time taken to complete after the first year (decline in function) but a reduction in time taken (improvement in function) in the second year (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Changes in trail making (TM) over 2 years. (A) TM A time; (B) TM B time; (C) TM B − A time.
Repeated measures models for change in cognition over time is a sensitive model for looking at scores over time. It takes into account the correlation between measures on the same person. In these models, scores for TM A and TM B were significantly lower than baseline at 2 years (Table 2), indicating at least no worsening or decline in executive function over time. A multiple linear regression model was also used to assess change in executive function using change in TM as dependent variables; this also showed no significant change in TM after adjusting for other variables (see online supplement).
Table 2.
Repeated measures models for trail making over time
Endpoint | Variable | Estimate | P Value |
---|---|---|---|
Trail making A | Intercept | −1.0 | 0.8949 |
Year 0 | — | — | |
Year 1 (vs. Year 0) | −2.2 | <0.0001 | |
Year 2 (vs. Year 0) | −3.0 | <0.0001 | |
Medical treatment | 0.3 | 0.7530 | |
Married | 1.0 | 0.2616 | |
Age | 0.6 | <0.0001 | |
High school education or less | 3.7 | <0.0001 | |
Income < $30,000 | 0.5 | 0.6094 | |
Beck Depression Inventory | 0.3 | 0.0059 | |
PaO2 | −0.019 | 0.6681 | |
PaCO2 | 0.103 | 0.1902 | |
Years smoked times cigarettes per day | 0.00002 | 0.9824 | |
Trail making B | Intercept | −56.7 | 0.0031 |
Year 0 | — | — | |
Year 1 (vs. Year 0) | 5.8 | <0.0001 | |
Year 2 (vs. Year 0) | −3.3 | 0.0237 | |
Medical treatment | 0.4 | 0.8344 | |
Married | 1.8 | 0.4619 | |
Age | 1.8 | <0.0001 | |
High school education or less | 15.6 | <0.0001 | |
Income <$30,000 | 3.0 | 0.1989 | |
Beck Depression Inventory | 1.0 | 0.0004 | |
PaO2 | 0.056 | 0.6222 | |
PaCO2 | 0.503 | 0.0134 | |
Years smoked times cigarettes per day | −0.001 | 0.4308 |
Executive Function and Survival
There was no significant difference in survival between patients with executive dysfunction (TM B > 102 s) and other patients (Table 3). We also looked at associations between survival and changes in TM scores after adjusting for other variables. Changes in TM B and TM A from baseline to 2 years were related to survival after Year 2 (an increase in TM B by 1 s was associated with a 1% increased hazard of death). However, changes TM B − A were not related to survival (see the online supplement).
Table 3.
Survival by baseline executive dysfunction
Variable | N | Events, n (%) | Median Days | Cox Multivariate Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Cox Multivariate Likelihood Ratio P Value (n = 1,205) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trail making B time, s | 0.7235 | ||||
Baseline trail B > 102 | 463 | 199 (43) | 1,549 | 1.03 (0.86–1.25) | |
Baseline trail B ≤ 102 | 755 | 295 (39) | 1,562 | — | |
Medical | 0.1987 | ||||
No | 608 | 233 (38) | 1,640 | — | |
Yes | 610 | 261 (43) | 1,482 | 1.13 (0.94–1.35) | |
Married | 0.5320 | ||||
No | 429 | 173 (40) | 1,448 | — | |
Yes | 789 | 321 (41) | 1,600 | 0.94 (0.77–1.15) | |
High school education or less | 0.9704 | ||||
No | 586 | 239 (41) | 1,538 | — | |
Yes | 632 | 255 (40) | 1,594 | 1.00 (0.82–1.21) | |
Income < $30,000 | 0.5314 | ||||
No | 563 | 222 (39) | 1,643 | — | |
Yes | 643 | 268 (42) | 1,489 | 1.07 (0.87–1.30) | |
Age | 1,218 | 494 (41) | 1,562 | 1.015 (0.998–1.031) | 0.0797 |
Beck Depression Inventory: baseline | 1,218 | 494 (41) | 1,562 | 1.019 (0.994–1.044) | 0.1405 |
PaO2: baseline | 1,217 | 494 (41) | 1,562 | 0.993 (0.983–1.002) | 0.1402 |
PaCO2: baseline | 1,217 | 494 (41) | 1,562 | 1.029 (1.012–1.046) | 0.0006 |
Years smoked times cigarettes smoked per day: baseline | 1,218 | 494 (41) | 1,562 | 1.0000 (0.9999–1.0002) | 0.6707 |
Definition of abbreviation: CI = confidence interval
Executive Function and Hospitalization
There was no significant difference in hospitalizations between patients with executive dysfunction (TM B > 102 s) and other patients (Table 3). We used models to look at whether changes in TM can predict the number of hospitalizations after the change (e.g., changes in TM B from baseline to 2 years was used to predict the number of hospitalizations after 2 years). None of the change variables were related to number of hospitalizations after adjusting for baseline TM score, surgery, marital status, age, education, income, depression, PaO2, PaCO2, and years smoked (see online supplement).
Discussion
This analysis represents the first longitudinal study of executive function and clinical outcomes in a large and well-characterized COPD cohort. It suggests that in patients with severe emphysema and heavy smoking exposure, executive dysfunction is present, but there is no significant decline in executive ability over 2 years after adjusting for other variables. Although change in executive function over 2 years was modestly associated with survival (increased TM B by 1 s associated with 1% increased hazard of death), changes in TM B − A suggested that the association is not specifically related to cognitive function but rather to the lack of manual dexterity required to complete the assessment. No association was found between executive function and hospitalization.
Our finding that 38% of the patients in the NETT cohort had executive dysfunction at baseline is similar to the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in a previous, small cross-sectional study of individuals with moderate to severe COPD (36%). Fewer NETT patients had executive dysfunction than has been reported for patients with COPD with more severe hypoxemia or during hospitalization for an exacerbation of COPD (57–61%) (1, 24).
Patients in our study with executive dysfunction tended to be older and less educated than those without; however, many of the differences were not clinically significant, with the exception of health status. Notably, lung function, PaO2, smoking exposure, survival, and hospitalizations were not significantly different in those with executive dysfunction. There are mixed results from other studies that have examined correlations between cognitive performance and disease severity measures in COPD, such as lung function and hypoxemia. Some suggest associations are weak (4, 24); others have demonstrated significant correlations and a more rapid cognitive decline in the presence of hypoxemia (25, 26). We found no association between executive function with either hypoxemia or hypercapnia.
The relationship between cognitive function and health status has been studied (24, 27). The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) correlates moderately with cognitive function (r = 0.37–0.45, P < 0.01) in both hypoxemic (28) and nonhypoxemic patients (r = −0.62, P = 0.005) (27). The relationship between severity of depression and cognitive dysfunction has also been examined in a metaanalysis, which found that episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed all correlated with severity of depression, but the correlations were relatively small (<10% shared variance) (29). In this study we found differences in depression scores and quality-of-life scores between individuals with and without abnormal TM tests were not clinically significant.
Mechanisms
The NETT cohort provides a unique experimental opportunity to advance our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie cognitive problems and their clinical impact in COPD. We have been able to examine the contribution of impaired lung function, smoking, and hypoxemia in the absence of significant comorbidities over a prolonged follow up. Our results indicate that COPD disease severity by itself is not independently associated with the development of executive dysfunction. Importantly also, this study demonstrates that in patients with COPD there is no significant association between executive function and hospitalization and no meaningful association with survival.It is possible that the observed cognitive impairment present in the absence of a significant decline in cognition during the study period may result from preexisting cognitive impairment or a decline process occurring earlier in the disease. There are some data to support this with mid-life impaired lung function associated with subsequent risk of cognitive impairment (10), but we would still expect to see some signal to indicate ongoing cognitive decline over a 2-year period in such a large sample if this were the case. Data from the Health and Retirement Study showed a greater decline in cognitive function in people with self-reported severe COPD (25), but this group had a greater chronic disease burden, with significantly higher rates of comorbid hypertension and stroke. Also, considering recent neuroimaging studies that point to cerebrovascular damage (15, 16), it is plausible that cerebrovascular comorbidities (significantly absent from this highly selected cohort) explain much of the cognitive pathology observed in patients with COPD.
Hospitalizations
Neither executive dysfunction at baseline nor changes in executive function over time were associated with hospitalization rates. This suggests that cognitive dysfunction is not a significant risk factor for hospitalization in this population and does not lend support to the hypothesis that exacerbations result in cognitive impairment. It is possible that either hospitalizations are truly not associated with cognitive decline or that there were insufficient events to demonstrate a relationship, given that the average number of days hospitalized during 2 years was low (mean, 1.5 d; median, 0 d).
Survival
Our findings on survival are novel, as no other study to date has the degree of characterization of enrolled patients with COPD and the 2-year follow-up data that we present in this study. TM B (letters and numbers) had equivocal results, as it was not significantly associated with survival in the first year but was modestly (at best) associated with survival in the second year. Although there was an increase in the TM B scores (overall decline in function) at year 1, the scores decrease (overall improve in function) at year 2 below the baseline levels. TM B − A was not associated with survival. Based on our results, executive function is not meaningfully associated with survival in patients with COPD.
Strengths and Limitations of This Work
This study represents the strongest of its kind to shed light into the association of cognitive impairment and meaningful outcomes in COPD, such as hospitalizations and survival. The latter is based on several aspects that make this study unique: first, detailed characterization of the individuals based on physiological tests versus self-report of COPD status (11, 25), and second, the follow-up time of 2 years in a large cohort that we consider sufficient to formulate our conclusions.
Although the TM tests may not provide the most comprehensive assessment of cognitive function, collectively they do provide a most sensitive and accurate measure of executive function (the cognitive domain most frequently and severely affected in COPD). The lack of a control group is a weakness of this study, which is partly counterbalanced by our large number, comprehensively characterized, longitudinal data and in-depth analysis.
Another important limitation of this study is that changes in TM scores were not available for all subjects. Subjects with TM scores at Month 24 had less severe disease than all 1,218 subjects who started the study, although analysis was performed on all patients and those with data at 24 months with no significant difference (see online supplement).
Conclusions
In this large population of patients with severe emphysema and heavy smoking exposure, there was no significant impairment or decline over 2 years in executive function after comprehensive adjustment for confounders. There was no association between executive function and hospitalizations and a possible modest (at best) association with survival.
Smoking and disease severity measures alone did not appear to explain executive function impairment. It is plausible that cerebrovascular comorbidities rather than lung function, smoking, and hypoxemia explain previously described cognitive pathology in COPD.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the investigators of the NETT trial for the use of this database (for a complete list of the NETT investigators, see the Appendix).
Appendix
Members of the NETT Research Group are as follows: Office of the Chair of the Steering Committee, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Alfred P. Fishman, M.D. (Chair); Betsy Ann Bozzarello; Ameena Al-Amin. Clinical centers: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX: Marcia Katz, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Carolyn Wheeler, R.N., B.S.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Elaine Baker, R.R.T., R.P.F.T.; Peter Barnard, Ph.D., R.P.F.T.; Phil Cagle, M.D.; James Carter, M.D.; Sophia Chatziioannou, M.D.; Karla Conejo-Gonzales; Kimberly Dubose, R.R.T.; John Haddad, M.D.; David Hicks, R.R.T., R.P.F.T.; Neal Kleiman, M.D.; Mary Milburn-Barnes, C.R.T.T.; Chinh Nguyen, R.P.F.T.; Michael Reardon, M.D.; Joseph Reeves-Viets, M.D.; Steven Sax, M.D.; Amir Sharafkhaneh, M.D.; Owen Wilson, Ph.D.; Christine Young, P.T.; Rafael Espada, M.D. (Principal Investigator 1996–2002); Rose Butanda (1999–2001); Minnie Ellisor (2002); Pamela Fox, M.D. (1999–2001); Katherine Hale, M.D. (1998–2000); Everett Hood, R.P.F.T. (1998–2000); Amy Jahn (1998–2000); Satish Jhingran, M.D. (1998–2001); Karen King, R.P.F.T. (1998–1999); Charles Miller III, Ph.D. (1996–1999); Imran Nizami, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator, 2000–2001); Todd Officer (1998–2000); Jeannie Ricketts (1998–2000); Joe Rodarte, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator 1996–2000); Robert Teague, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator 1999–2000); Kedren Williams (1998–1999). Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA: John Reilly, M.D. (Principal Investigator); David Sugarbaker, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Carol Fanning, R.R.T. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Simon Body, M.D.; Sabine Duffy, M.D.; Vladmir Formanek, M.D.; Anne Fuhlbrigge, M.D.; Philip Hartigan, M.D.; Sarah Hooper, E.P.; Andetta Hunsaker, M.D.; Francine Jacobson, M.D.; Marilyn Moy, M.D.; Susan Peterson, R.R.T.; Roger Russell, M.D.; Diane Saunders; Scott Swanson, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator, 1996–2001). Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA: Rob McKenna, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Zab Mohsenifar, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Carol Geaga, R.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Manmohan Biring, M.D.; Susan Clark, R.N., M.N.; Jennifer Cutler, M.D.; Robert Frantz, M.D.; Peter Julien, M.D.; Michael Lewis, M.D.; Jennifer Minkoff-Rau, M.S.W.; Valentina Yegyan, B.S., C.P.F.T.; Milton Joyner, B.A. (1996–2002). Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH: Malcolm DeCamp, M.D. (Principal Investigator); James Stoller, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Yvonne Meli, R.N., (Principal Clinic Coordinator); John Apostolakis, M.D.; Darryl Atwell, M.D.; Jeffrey Chapman, M.D.; Pierre DeVilliers, M.D.; Raed Dweik, M.D.; Erik Kraenzler, M.D.; Rosemary Lann, L.I.S.W.; Nancy Kurokawa, R.R.T., C.P.F.T.; Scott Marlow, R.R.T.; Kevin McCarthy, R.C.P.T.; Priscilla McCreight, R.R.T., C.P.F.T.; Atul Mehta, M.D.; Moulay Meziane, M.D.; Omar Minai, M.D.; Mindi Steiger, R.R.T.; Kenneth White, R.P.F.T.; Janet Maurer, M.D. (Principal Investigator, 1996–2001); Terri Durr, R.N. (2000–2001); Charles Hearn, D.O. (1998–2001); Susan Lubell, P.A.-C. (1999–2000); Peter O’Donovan, M.D. (1998–2003); Robert Schilz, D.O. (1998–2002). Columbia University, New York, NY in consortium with Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY; Mark Ginsburg, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Byron Thomashow, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Patricia Jellen, M.S.N., R.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); John Austin, M.D.; Matthew Bartels, M.D.; Yahya Berkmen, M.D.; Patricia Berkoski, M.S., R.R.T. (Site coordinator, LIJ); Frances Brogan, M.S.N., R.N.; Amy Chong, B.S., C.R.T.; Glenda DeMercado, B.S.N.; Angela DiMango, M.D.; Sandy Do, M.S., P.T.; Bessie Kachulis, M.D.; Arfa Khan, M.D.; Berend Mets, M.D.; Mitchell O’Shea, B.S., R.T., C.P.F.T.; Gregory Pearson, M.D.; Leonard Rossoff, M.D.; Steven Scharf, M.D., Ph.D. (Co-Principal Investigator, 1998–2002); Maria Shiau, M.D.; Paul Simonelli, M.D.; Kim Stavrolakes, M.S., P.T.; Donna Tsang, B.S.; Denise Vilotijevic, M.S., P.T.; Chun Yip, M.D.; Mike Mantinaos, M.D. (1998–2001); Kerri McKeon, B.S., R.R.T., R.N. (1998–1999); Jacqueline Pfeffer, M.P.H., P.T. (1997–2002). Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC: Neil MacIntyre, M.D. (Principal Investigator); R. Duane Davis, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); John Howe, R.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); R. Edward Coleman, M.D.; Rebecca Crouch, R.P.T.; Dora Greene; Katherine Grichnik, M.D.; David Harpole, Jr., M.D.; Abby Krichman, R.R.T.; Brian Lawlor, R.R.T.; Holman McAdams, M.D.; John Plankeel, M.D.; Susan Rinaldo-Gallo, M.E.D.; Sheila Shearer, R.R.T.; Jeanne Smith, A.C.S.W.; Mark Stafford-Smith, M.D.; Victor Tapson, M.D.; Mark Steele, M.D. (1998–1999); Jennifer Norten, M.D. (1998–1999). Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN: James Utz, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Claude Deschamps, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Kathy Mieras, C.C.R.P. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Martin Abel, M.D.; Mark Allen, M.D.; Deb Andrist, R.N.; Gregory Aughenbaugh, M.D.; Sharon Bendel, R.N.; Eric Edell, M.D.; Marlene Edgar; Bonnie Edwards; Beth Elliot, M.D.; James Garrett, R.R.T.; Delmar Gillespie, M.D.; Judd Gurney, M.D.; Boleyn Hammel; Karen Hanson, R.R.T.; Lori Hanson, R.R.T.; Gordon Harms, M.D.; June Hart; Thomas Hartman, M.D.; Robert Hyatt, M.D.; Eric Jensen, M.D.; Nicole Jenson, R.R.T.; Sanjay Kalra, M.D.; Philip Karsell, M.D.; Jennifer Lamb; David Midthun, M.D.; Carl Mottram, R.R.T.; Stephen Swensen, M.D.; Anne-Marie Sykes, M.D.; Karen Taylor; Norman Torres, M.D.; Rolf Hubmayr, M.D. (1998–2000); Daniel Miller, M.D. (1999–2002); Sara Bartling, R.N. (1998–2000); Kris Bradt (1998–2002). National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO: Barry Make, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Marvin Pomerantz, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Mary Gilmartin, R.N., R.R.T. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Joyce Canterbury; Martin Carlos; Phyllis Dibbern, P.T.; Enrique Fernandez, M.D.; Lisa Geyman, M.S.P.T.; Connie Hudson; David Lynch, M.D.; John Newell, M.D.; Robert Quaife, M.D.; Jennifer Propst, R.N.; Cynthia Raymond, M.S.; Jane Whalen-Price, P.T.; Kathy Winner, O.T.R.; Martin Zamora, M.D.; Reuben Cherniack, M.D. (Principal Investigator, 1997–2000). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH: Philip Diaz, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Patrick Ross, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Tina Bees (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Jan Drake; Charles Emery, Ph.D.; Mark Gerhardt, M.D., Ph.D.; Mark King, M.D.; David Rittinger; Mahasti Rittinger. Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO: Keith Naunheim, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Robert Gerber, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Joan Osterloh, R.N., M.S.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Susan Borosh; Willard Chamberlain, D.O.; Sally Frese; Alan Hibbit; Mary Ellen Kleinhenz, M.D.; Gregg Ruppel; Cary Stolar, M.D.; Janice Willey; Francisco Alvarez, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator, 1999–2002); Cesar Keller, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator, 1996–2000). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA: Gerard Criner, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Satoshi Furukawa, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Anne Marie Kuzma, R.N., M.S.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Roger Barnette, M.D.; Neil Brister, M.D.; Kevin Carney, R.N., C.C.T.C.; Wissam Chatila, M.D.; Francis Cordova, M.D.; Gilbert D’Alonzo, D.O.; Michael Keresztury, M.D.; Karen Kirsch; Chul Kwak, M.D.; Kathy Lautensack, R.N., B.S.N.; Madelina Lorenzon, C.P.F.T.; Ubaldo Martin, M.D.; Peter Rising, MS; Scott Schartel, M.D.; John Travaline, M.D.; Gwendolyn Vance, R.N., C.C.T.C.; Phillip Boiselle, M.D. (1997–2000); Gerald O’Brien, M.D. (1997–2000). University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA: Andrew Ries, M.D., M.P.H. (Principal Investigator); Robert Kaplan, Ph.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Catherine Ramirez, B.S., R.C.P. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); David Frankville, M.D.; Paul Friedman, M.D.; James Harrell, M.D.; Jeffery Johnson; David Kapelanski, M.D.; David Kupferberg, M.D., M.P.H.; Catherine Larsen, M.P.H.; Trina Limberg, R.R.T.; Michael Magliocca, R.N., C.N.P.; Frank J. Papatheofanis, M.D., Ph.D.; Dawn Sassi-Dambron, R.N.; Melissa Weeks. University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, M.D. in consortium with Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, M.D.: Mark Krasna, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Henry Fessler, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Iris Moskowitz (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Timothy Gilbert, M.D.; Jonathan Orens, M.D.; Steven Scharf, M.D., Ph.D.; David Shade; Stanley Siegelman, M.D.; Kenneth Silver, M.D.; Clarence Weir; Charles White, M.D. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI: Fernando Martinez, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Mark Iannettoni, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Catherine Meldrum, B.S.N., R.N., C.C.R.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); William Bria, M.D.; Kelly Campbell; Paul Christensen, M.D.; Kevin Flaherty, M.D.; Steven Gay, M.D.; Paramjit Gill, R.N.; Paul Kazanjian, M.D.; Ella Kazerooni, M.D.; Vivian Knieper; Tammy Ojo, M.D.; Lewis Poole; Leslie Quint, M.D.; Paul Rysso; Thomas Sisson, M.D.; Mercedes True; Brian Woodcock, M.D.; Lori Zaremba, R.N. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Larry Kaiser, M.D. (Principal Investigator); John Hansen-Flaschen, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Mary Louise Dempsey, B.S.N., R.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Abass Alavi, M.D.; Theresa Alcorn, Selim Arcasoy, M.D.; Judith Aronchick, M.D.; Stanley Aukberg, M.D.; Bryan Benedict, R.R.T.; Susan Craemer, B.S., R.R.T., C.P.F.T.; Ron Daniele, M.D.; Jeffrey Edelman, M.D.; Warren Gefter, M.D.; Laura Kotler-Klein, M.S.S.; Robert Kotloff, M.D.; David Lipson, M.D.; Wallace Miller, Jr., M.D.; Richard O’Connell, R.P.F.T.; Staci Opelman, M.S.W.; Harold Palevsky, M.D.; William Russell, R.P.F.T.; Heather Sheaffer, M.S.W.; Rodney Simcox, B.S.R.T., R.R.T.; Susanne Snedeker, R.R.T., C.P.F.T.; Jennifer Stone-Wynne, M.S.W.; Gregory Tino, M.D.; Peter Wahl; James Walter, R.P.F.T.; Patricia Ward; David Zisman, M.D.; James Mendez, M.S.N., C.R.N.P. (1997–2001); Angela Wurster, M.S.N., C.R.N.P. (1997–1999). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA: Frank Sciurba, M.D. (Principal Investigator); James Luketich, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Colleen Witt, M.S. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Gerald Ayres; Michael Donahoe, M.D.; Carl Fuhrman, M.D.; Robert Hoffman, M.D.; Joan Lacomis, M.D.; Joan Sexton; William Slivka; Diane Strollo, M.D.; Erin Sullivan, M.D.; Tomeka Simon; Catherine Wrona, R.N., B.S.N.; Gerene Bauldoff, R.N., M.S.N. (1997–2000); Manuel Brown, M.D. (1997–2002); Elisabeth George, R.N., M.S.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator 1997–2001); Robert Keenan, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator 1997–2000); Theodore Kopp, M.S. (1997–1999); Laurie Silfies (1997–2001). University of Washington, Seattle, WA: Joshua Benditt, M.D. (Principal Investigator), Douglas Wood, M.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Margaret Snyder, M.N. (Principal Clinic Coordinator); Kymberley Anable; Nancy Battaglia; Louie Boitano; Andrew Bowdle, M.D.; Leighton Chan, M.D.; Cindy Chwalik; Bruce Culver, M.D.; Thurman Gillespy, M.D.; David Godwin, M.D.; Jeanne Hoffman; Andra Ibrahim, M.D.; Diane Lockhart; Stephen Marglin, M.D.; Kenneth Martay, M.D.; Patricia McDowell; Donald Oxorn, M.D.; Liz Roessler; Michelle Toshima; Susan Golden (1998–2000). Other participants: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD: Lynn Bosco, M.D., M.P.H.; Yen-Pin Chiang, Ph.D.; Carolyn Clancy, M.D.; Harry Handelsman, D.O. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, M.D.: Steven M Berkowitz, Ph.D.; Tanisha Carino, Ph.D.; Joe Chin, M.D.; JoAnna Baldwin; Karen McVearry; Anthony Norris; Sarah Shirey; Claudette Sikora; Steven Sheingold, Ph.D. (1997–2004). Coordinating Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD: Steven Piantadosi, M.D., Ph.D. (Principal Investigator); James Tonascia, Ph.D. (Co-Principal Investigator); Patricia Belt; Amanda Blackford, Sc.M.; Karen Collins; Betty Collison; Ryan Colvin, M.P.H.; John Dodge; Michele Donithan, M.H.S.; Vera Edmonds; Gregory L. Foster, M.A.; Julie Fuller; Judith Harle; Rosetta Jackson; Shing Lee, Sc.M.; Charlene Levine; Hope Livingston; Jill Meinert; Jennifer Meyers; Deborah Nowakowski; Kapreena Owens; Shangqian Qi, M.D.; Michael Smith; Brett Simon, M.D.; Paul Smith; Alice Sternberg, Sc.M.; Mark Van Natta, M.H.S.; Laura Wilson, Sc.M.; Robert Wise, M.D. Cost Effectiveness Subcommittee: Robert M. Kaplan, Ph.D. (Chair); J. Sanford Schwartz, M.D. (Co-Chair); Yen-Pin Chiang, Ph.D.; Marianne C. Fahs, Ph.D.; A. Mark Fendrick, M.D.; Alan J. Moskowitz, M.D.; Dev Pathak, Ph.D.; Scott Ramsey, M.D., Ph.D.; Steven Sheingold, Ph.D.; A. Laurie Shroyer, Ph.D.; Judith Wagner, Ph.D.; Roger Yusen, M.D. Cost Effectiveness Data Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA: Scott Ramsey, M.D., Ph.D. (Principal Investigator); Ruth Etzioni, Ph.D.; Sean Sullivan, Ph.D.; Douglas Wood, M.D.; Thomas Schroeder, M.A.; Karma Kreizenbeck; Kristin Berry, M.S.; Nadia Howlader, M.S. CT Scan Image Storage and Analysis Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA: Eric Hoffman, Ph.D. (Principal Investigator); Janice Cook-Granroth, B.S.; Angela Delsing, R.T.; Junfeng Guo, Ph.D.; Geoffrey McLennan, M.D.; Brian Mullan, M.D.; Chris Piker, B.S.; Joseph Reinhardt, Ph.D.; Blake Wood; Jered Sieren, R.T.R.; William Stanford, M.D. Data and Safety Monitoring Board: John A. Waldhausen, M.D. (Chair); Gordon Bernard, M.D.; David DeMets, Ph.D.; Mark Ferguson, M.D.; Eddie Hoover, M.D.; Robert Levine, M.D.; Donald Mahler, M.D.; A. John McSweeny, Ph.D.; Jeanine Wiener-Kronish, M.D.; O. Dale Williams, Ph.D.; Magdy Younes, M.D. Marketing Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA: Gerard Criner, M.D. (Principal Investigator); Charles Soltoff, M.B.A. Project Office, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD: Gail Weinmann, M.D. (Project Officer); Joanne Deshler (Contracting Officer); Dean Follmann, Ph.D.; James Kiley, Ph.D.; Margaret Wu, Ph.D. (1996-2001).
Footnotes
Supported by the National Institutes of Health grant 5R01HL094680–05 (R.P.B.). The National Emphysema Treatment Trial was supported by contracts with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute N01HR76101, N01HR76102, N01HR76103, N01HR76104, N01HR76105, N01HR76106, N01HR76107, N01HR76108, N01HR76109, N01HR76110, N01HR76111, N01HR76112, N01HR76113, N01HR76114, N01HR76115, N01HR76116, N01HR76118, and N01HR76119; the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Author Contributions: J.W.D., P.N., F.C.S., and R.P.B. all had substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. J.W.D., P.N., and R.P.B. were involved in drafting the manuscript, and all authors gave final approval.
This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue’s table of contents at www.atsjournals.org
Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.
References
- 1.Dodd JW, Charlton RA, van den Broek MD, Jones PW. Cognitive dysfunction in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest. 2013;144:119–127. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dodd JW, Getov SV, Jones PW. Cognitive function in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010;35:913–922. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00125109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Agustí AG, Noguera A, Sauleda J, Sala E, Pons J, Busquets X. Systemic effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2003;21:347–360. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00405703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grant I, Heaton RK, McSweeny AJ, Adams KM, Timms RM. Neuropsychologic findings in hypoxemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:1470–1476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Antonelli-Incalzi R, Corsonello A, Trojano L, Pedone C, Acanfora D, Spada A, Izzo O, Rengo F. Screening of cognitive impairment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;23:264–270. doi: 10.1159/000100773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Antonelli-Incalzi R, Corsonello A, Pedone C, Trojano L, Acanfora D, Spada A, Izzo O, Rengo F. Drawing impairment predicts mortality in severe COPD. Chest. 2006;130:1687–1694. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antonelli-Incalzi R, Corsonello A, Trojano L, Acanfora D, Spada A, Izzo O, Rengo F. Correlation between cognitive impairment and dependence in hypoxemic COPD. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008;30:141–150. doi: 10.1080/13803390701287390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Campman CAM, Sitskoorn MM. Better care for patients with COPD and cognitive impairment. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:504–506. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70163-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Villeneuve S, Pepin V, Rahayel S, Bertrand JA, de Lorimier M, Rizk A, Desjardins C, Parenteau S, Beaucage F, Joncas S, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in moderate to severe COPD: a preliminary study. Chest. 2012;142:1516–1523. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-3035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rusanen M, Ngandu T, Laatikainen T, Tuomilehto J, Soininen H, Kivipelto M. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a population based CAIDE study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2013;10:549–555. doi: 10.2174/1567205011310050011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Singh B, Parsaik AK, Mielke MM, Roberts RO, Scanlon PD, Geda YE, Pankratz VS, Christianson T, Yawn BP, Petersen RC. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and association with mild cognitive impairment: the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:1222–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barnes PJ, Celli BR. Systemic manifestations and comorbidities of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2009;33:1165–1185. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00128008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Longstreth WT, Jr, Manolio TA, Arnold A, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Enright PL, O’Leary D, Fried L. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1274–1282. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.8.1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liao D, Higgins M, Bryan NR, Eigenbrodt ML, Chambless LE, Lamar V, Burke GL, Heiss G. Lower pulmonary function and cerebral subclinical abnormalities detected by MRI: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Chest. 1999;116:150–156. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.1.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dodd JW, Chung AW, van den Broek MD, Barrick TR, Charlton RA, Jones PW. Brain structure and function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multimodal cranial magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:240–245. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0355OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lahousse L, Vernooij MW, Darweesh SKL, Akoudad S, Loth DW, Joos GF, Hofman A, Stricker BH, Ikram MA, Brusselle GG. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebral microbleeds: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:783–788. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0455OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wilson RS, Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Dong X, Leurgens SE, Evans DA. Cognitive decline after hospitalization in a community population of older persons. Neurology. 2012;78:950–956. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824d5894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Patel ARC, Kowlessar BS, Donaldson GC, Mackay AJ, Singh R, George SN, Garcha DS, Wedzicha JA, Hurst JR. Cardiovascular risk, myocardial injury, and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:1091–1099. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1170OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Donaldson GC, Hurst JR, Smith CJ, Hubbard RB, Wedzicha JA. Increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke following exacerbation of COPD. Chest. 2010;137:1091–1097. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dodd JW, Novotny P, Sciurba FC, Benzo R. Executive function, survival and hospitalisation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a longitudinal analysis of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) [abstract] Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:A6190. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201506-373OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.The National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Rationale and design of The National Emphysema Treatment Trial: a prospective randomized trial of lung volume reduction surgery. Chest. 1999;116:1750–1761. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ashendorf L, Jefferson AL, O’Connor MK, Chaisson C, Green RC, Stern RA. Trail Making Test errors in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corrigan JD, Hinkeldey NS. Relationships between parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. J Clin Psychol. 1987;43:402–409. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198707)43:4<402::aid-jclp2270430411>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grant I, Prigatano GP, Heaton RK, McSweeny AJ, Wright EC, Adams KM. Progressive neuropsychologic impairment and hypoxemia: relationship in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:999–1006. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800230079013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hung WW, Wisnivesky JP, Siu AL, Ross JS. Cognitive decline among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:134–137. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200902-0276OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thakur N, Blanc PD, Julian LJ, Yelin EH, Katz PP, Sidney S, Iribarren C, Eisner MD. COPD and cognitive impairment: the role of hypoxemia and oxygen therapy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010;5:263–269. doi: 10.2147/copd.s10684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liesker JJ, Postma DS, Beukema RJ, ten Hacken NH, van der Molen T, Riemersma RA, van Zomeren EH, Kerstjens HA. Cognitive performance in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2004;98:351–356. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McSweeny AJ, Grant I, Heaton RK, Adams KM, Timms RM. Life quality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:473–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McDermott LM, Ebmeier KP. A meta-analysis of depression severity and cognitive function. J Affect Disord. 2009;119:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]