Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Soc Work Pract. 2014 Aug 11;25(5):578–586. doi: 10.1177/1049731514546027

Addressing Parental Mental Health Within Interventions for Children: A Review

Mary C Acri 1, Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood 1
PMCID: PMC4627715  NIHMSID: NIHMS677455  PMID: 26527857

Abstract

Purpose

Untreated parent mental health problems have deleterious effects upon the family, yet caregivers are unlikely to receive services for their emotional health. We conducted a review of treatments and services for children and adolescents that also offered services to parents.

Methods

Child treatment and service studies were included in the present study if they analyzed parent symptoms or diagnoses over time, and the intervention contained a parent component.

Results

Of 200 studies reviewed, 20 contained a component for the parent and assessed the parent’s emotional health at multiple time points. Depression and anxiety were the most commonly studied parental mental health problem; most parent components consisted of behavioral strategies in service of the child’s psychological health.

Conclusion

Major shifts in health care policy affecting mental health services provide an opportunity to create integrated and coordinated health and behavioral health systems. Attention must be given to ensure that the workforce of providers, the administrative structures, and the reimbursement strategies are strengthened and connected to serve the needs of parents/caregivers and children in order to enhance family outcomes.

Keywords: parent mental health, child mental health services, parent support, service fragmentation, parent outcomes

Parents of children with psychiatric disorders are more likely to evidence mental health problems than the general population (Gopalan, Dean-Assael, Klingstein, Chacko, & McKay, 2011). Their parenting responsibilities are compounded by challenges associated with navigating mental health, school, and other systems to meet their child’s needs (Bailey, Golden, Roberts, & Ford, 2007; Yatchmenoff, Koren, Friesen, Gordon, & Kinney, 1998). They experience stigma and blame by family, friends, and their child’s school and providers because of their child’s difficulties (Oruche, Gerkensmeyer, Stephan, Wheeler, & Hanna, 2012; Scharer, 2002, 2005). Many lack needed social support and experience considerable social isolation (Lee, Anderson, Horowitz, & August, 2009; Oruche et al., 2012; Rishel et al., 2006). Parents who are impacted by poverty, and experience social/environmental stressors such as child welfare involvement, community, and interpersonal violence, are particularly at risk for mental health problems (Marcenko, Lyons, & Courtney, 2011).

A robust mental health literature suggests many mental health disorders experienced in adulthood are treatable. For example, depression and anxiety, which are two of the most common mental health disorders among adults (Anxiety and Depression Association of America, 2013), are effectively treated by cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy, and pharmacologic agents, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Miranda et al., 2003). Yet most adults, and especially female caregivers, do not receive mental health services (Glied, Newfield, & McCormack, 2003; Grote, Bledsoe, Swartz, & Frank, 2004; Swartz et al., 2002). Lack of child care, insurance, and transportation are substantial impediments to receipt of services, especially among caregivers living in poverty due to their lack of financial resources (Miranda & Bruce, 2002; Miranda & Green, 1999; Rosen, Tolman, & Warner, 2004). Stigma (Glied et al., 2003; Grote et al., 2004; Swartz et al., 2002) and concerns that service use will result in a loss of their parental rights are also powerful dissuaders from service use among caregivers (Mauthner, 1999; McIntosh, 1993; Miranda & Bruce, 2002; Shakespeare, Blake, & Garcia, 2003; Templeton, Velleman, Persaud, & Milner, 2003). Parents living in poverty, especially those who identify as belonging to an ethnic minority group, are particularly unlikely to seek mental health treatment because of these perceptual impediments.

Mental health disorders in parents influence their child’s mental health. For example, depression and anxiety increase the risk of both disorders among their offspring in comparison to children of parents without a mood or anxiety disorder (Weissman et al., 1996). Similar findings have been shown for bipolar disorder (Birmaher et al., 2009), schizophrenia (Asar-now et al., 2001), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (Biederman et al., 1995).

Untreated parental mental health issues are also associated with less optimal therapeutic progress and poorer outcomes among youth in treatment (Beauchaine, Webster-Stratton, & Reid, 2005; Pilowsky et al., 2008; Rishel et al., 2006). Studies of therapeutic outcomes for children with disruptive behavioral disorders, for example, suggest parent depression inhibits uptake of behavioral parenting strategies and undermines therapeutic outcomes (Chronis, Chacko, Fabiano, Wymbs, & Pel-ham, 2004). Yet when the parent’s issues resolve, child symptoms and impairment abate (Brent et al., 1998; Coiro, Riley, Broitman, & Miranda, 2012; Foster et al., 2009; Gordon, Antshel, & Lewandowski, 2012; Pilowsky et al., 2008).

Because of this connection, there have been calls to attend to the emotional health of parents within the context of their child’s treatment. This premise is concordant with a growing movement to address parental mental health in settings that caregivers, and primarily mothers, naturally frequent, such as pediatric clinics (Earls, 2010), obstetric and gynecological offices (Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2010), and even supermarkets (Swartz et al., 2002). Considerable barriers to linking child and parent mental health services have been cited, particularly in real-world settings. The existence of separate sectors to address children’s issues, along with separate funding streams, lack of training in the workforce, and biases toward parents about their presumed contribution to their child’s problems results in a fragmented and uncoordinated set of systems for children and their parents (Blanch, Nicholson, & Purcell, 1994; Mason & Subedi, 2006). There have been few studies specifically addressing parental mental health within the context of child treatments (Silverman, Kurtines, Jaccard, & Pina, 2009). The extent to which it is a component of child treatment and how has not been systematically examined.

The current study aims to answer these questions. The interventions reviewed in this project were analyzed as part of a larger study of outcome domains in child mental health treatments and services. This review focuses specifically on services offered to parents within the context of child mental health treatments and services. It is likely that interventions addressing both child and parent mental health can reduce logistical obstacles associated with navigating multiple services, potentially enhance youth outcomes, and serve as a model for service integration among providers working with families with complex needs.

Method

This review is an analysis of a data set that was compiled for a prior review. Briefly, the initial project examined outcome domains that were investigated within studies of mental health treatments and services for children between birth and 18 years of age. Inclusion criteria consisted of articles that were published between 1996 and 2011, used a randomized experimental design, and had either a 6-month or longer posttreatment follow-up assessment for treatment studies or a 6-month or longer postbaseline data point for service studies. In total, 200 studies described in 224 articles were included.

The authors used the same descriptive categories to classify treatment and service studies and the same outcome domains as in the prior review. Specifically, treatment and service studies were grouped separately, and treatment studies were further categorized by symptom or diagnosis, comorbid conditions, or other, yielding 12 categories: (1) attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, (2) anxiety, (3) autism, (4) conduct, (5) bipolar, (6) comorbid disorders, (7) depression, (8) eating disorders, (9) other (a general category for studies that did not fit in any of the other categories), (10) personality disorder, (11) posttraumatic stress disorder, and (12) services for emotional/behavioral problems.

Outcome domains were coded according to a typology referred to as SISYPHUS: (1) symptoms and diagnoses, (2) functioning/impairment, (3) consumer-oriented perspectives, (4) interpersonal–environmental contexts, (5) services/systems, (6) parent symptoms and diagnoses, and (7) health. Parent symptoms and diagnoses was defined as emotions or behaviors that the child’s parent or caregiver exhibits, often leading to a formal psychiatric diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth edition (American Psychiatric Association and American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV, 1994). See Hoagwood et al. (2012) for a fuller explanation and definition of each construct.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Child treatment and service studies were included in the present study if they analyzed parent symptoms or diagnoses over time, and the intervention contained a parent component, which was broadly defined as involving the parent in some way (e.g., providing information about the child’s mental health difficulty, family therapy, parenting skills training).

Coding and Analysis

To code the parent component, the two authors (Acri and Hoag-wood) systematically reviewed the 200 original studies in biweekly meetings over 6 months. The two authors developed a coding typology for treatments and services ranging from 0, which was defined as not containing a parent component, to 3, defined as providing a parent component explicitly for the parent’s own psychological health. Any discrepancies were discussed among the authors until consensus was reached. The coding system was refined until no additional codes were needed. Table 1 presents the coding typology.

Table 1.

Coding Typology.

Code Definition Example
0 No parent component offered Child-focused treatment with no parent contact aside from updates regarding the child’s progress.
1 Minimal parent component Pamphlets, informational handouts
2 Active parent component in service of the child Family therapy, parenting skills training
3 Active parent component for the parent’s emotional health Cognitive–behavioral therapy, provision of emotional support
Open in a new tab

Results

Of the pool of 200 studies, 20 (10%) met criteria for inclusion in the current review, meaning they contained a component for the parent and assessed the parent’s emotional health at multiple time points. The 20 studies were grouped within the following four treatment/services categories for children: (1) conduct (n = 15, 75%), (2) anxiety (n = 3, 15%), (3) services (n = 1, 4.5%), and (4) posttraumatic stress (n = 1, 4.5%). In addition to their focus on parental emotional health, over a third of the studies (n = 7, 35%) recruited families that evidenced risk factors for child health and well-being. Specifically, five (71.4%) were recruited from poverty-impacted communities or purposely enrolled families who were of low socioeconomic status, and the other two (n = 2, 28.6%) were recruited from families that experienced domestic violence. See Table 2 for a list of included studies.

Table 2.

List of studies.

Child Treatment/Service Title Authors Active Intervention Risk Code
1. Conduct Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term pre- vention of criminality and violence. Borduin et al. (1995) Multisystemic Therapy No 2
2. Conduct Brief psychoeducational parenting program: An evaluation and 1-year follow-up. Bradley et al. (2003) Brief Psychoeducational Parenting Program No 2
3. Conduct Long-term effectiveness of a parenting intervention for children at risk of developing conduct disorder. Bywater et al. (2009) The Incredible Years Basic Parenting Program Yes 2
4. Conduct Randomized controlled trial of a parenting intervention in the voluntary sector for reducing child conduct problems: Outcomes and mechanisms of change. Gardner, Burton, & Klimes (2006) The Incredible Years Parenting Program Yes 2
5. Conduct Parenting intervention in Sure Start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Hutchings et al. (2007) The Incredible Years Basic Parenting Program Yes 2
6. Conduct Reducing conduct problems among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A randomized clinical trial examining effects of project support. Jouriles et al. (2009) Project Support Yes 3
7. Conduct A pilot, controlled skills training study of schizotypal high school students. Lieberman, Ippen, & Van Horn (2006) Child-Parent Psychotherapy Yes 2
8. Conduct A controlled evaluation of an enhanced self-directed behavioral family inter- vention for parents of children with conduct problems in rural and remote areas. Markie-Dadds & Sanders (2006) Enhanced Self-Directed Family Intervention No 2
9. Conduct Evaluation of a brief parenting discussion group for parents of young children. Morawska, Haslam, Mile, & Sanders (2010) The Triple P-Positive Par- enting Program No 2
10. Conduct Improving mental health through parenting programs: Block randomized controlled trial. Patterson et al. (2002) Family Nurturing Network Parenting Program (Webster- Stratton’s Parents and Children Series). No 2
11. Conduct Follow-up of children who received the Incredible Years intervention for oppositional-defiant disorder: Main- tenance and prediction of 2-year outcome. Reid, Webster-Stratton, & Hammond (2003) The Incredible Years Teacher and Child Training Programs No 2
12. Conduct Treatment of depressed mothers with disruptive children: A controlled evaluation of cognitive behavioral family intervention. Sanders & McFarland (2000) Cognitive Behavioral Family Intervention Yes 3
13. Conduct Maintenance of treatment gains: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Sanders, Bor, & Morawska (2007) Enhanced Triple P-Positive Parenting Program No 3
14. Conduct Help when it is needed first: A controlled evaluation of brief, behavioral family intervention in a primary care setting. Turner & Sanders (2006) Primary Care Triple P-Positive Parenting Program No 2
15. Conduct Maternal depression and child behavior problems: Randomized placebo- controlled trial of a cognitive- behavioral group intervention. Verduyn, Barrowclough, Roberts, Tarrier, & Harrington (2003) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Yes 3
16. Anxiety Cognitive–behavioral family treatment of childhood obsessive–compulsive disorder: A controlled trial Barrett, Healy-Farrell, & March (2004) Freedom From Obsessions and Compulsions Using Cognitive Behavioral Strategies (FOCUS) No 2
17. Anxiety Effectiveness of CBT versus standard treatment for childhood anxiety disorders in a community clinic setting Barrington, Prior, Richardson, & Allen (2005) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy No 3
18. Anxiety Directionality of change in youth anxiety treatment involving parents: An initial examination. Silverman, Kurtines, Jaccard, & Pina (2009) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy No 3
19. Posttraumatic Stress A follow-up study of a multisite, ran- domized, controlled trial for children with sexual abuse-related PTSD symptoms Deblinger, Marrarino, Cohen, & Steer (2006) Trauma-Focused CBT No 2
20. Services Randomized comparison of the effectiveness and costs of community and hospital-based mental health services for children with behavioral disorders. Harrington et al. (2000) Parent Education Group No 2
Open in a new tab

Note. CBT = cognitive–behavioral therapy; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder.

Parent Symptoms and Diagnoses

Depression and anxiety were the most commonly assessed mental health problems among parents. All but one study measured depression (n = 19, 95%), which was typically assessed via a structured interview or standardized measure such as the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, Steer, & Carbin, 1988) or the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS; Antony, Bieling, Cox, Enns, & Swinson, 1998). The prevailing rationale for measuring parental depression was to prevent the inhibition of behavioral parenting strategies critical to enhancing therapeutic outcomes (Chronis et al., 2004). The sole study that did not measure parental depression was a treatment for child anxiety (Silverman et al., 2009); only symptoms of anxiety were measured among parents.

Parental anxiety was assessed in almost three quarters of studies (n = 14, 70%), usually by a standardized assessment instrument such as the DASS, the General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg & Williams, 2000), or the anxiety subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90–Revised (Derogatis & Unger, 2010). Anxiety among caregivers was measured (and addressed) in order to reduce the maintenance of anxiety among their children, as parental distress was viewed as transmissible to the child and interfered with treatment gains (Kendall, Hudson, Gosch, Flannery-Schroeder, & Suveg, 2008).

Additional mental health problems among parents that were assessed included emotional distress over their child’s sexual abuse (n = 1, 5%; Deblinger, Mannarino, Cohen, & Steer, 2006) and symptoms of trauma (Jouriles et al., 2009); however, these were studied substantially less frequently.

Parent Component and Outcomes

Parent component in service of the child’s psychological health

The parent component in 14 (70%) of the 20 studies was in service of the child’s psychological health. Of the 14 studies, 10 (71.4%) offered parents parenting skills or programs such as Triple P (e.g., Sanders, Bor, & Morawska, 2007; Turner & Sanders, 2006) and The Incredible Years (e.g., Bywater et al., 2009; Hutchings et al., 2007; Patterson et al., 2002). An 11th study, by Barrett, Healy-Farrell, and March (2004), offered parenting skills in conjunction with psychoeducation and cognitive–behavioral strategies for parents to reduce their child’s anxiety.

The other three (21.4%) studies offered parents cognitive–behavioral strategies to manage their child’s anxiety or distress after sexual abuse (Deblinger et al., 2006), Multisystemic Therapy, a family-based treatment to reduce severe conduct problems among youth (Borduin et al., 1995), and Child/Parent Psychotherapy (Lieberman, Ippen, & Van Horn, 2006), a parent/child psychotherapy that draws from multiple theories (e.g., attachment, social learning, cognitive behavior, and trauma) to improve child behavior through the parent–child relationship.

Under a third of studies (n = 6, 30%) offered a service to the parents for their own emotional health (Barrington, Prior, Richardson, & Allen et al., 2005; Jouriles et al., 2009; Sanders & McFarland, 2000; Sanders et al., 2007; Silverman et al., 2009; Verduyn, Barrowclough, Roberts, Tarrier, & Harrington, 2003). Of them, the common component offered to parents was cognitive–behavioral strategies, which were either provided alone (Barrington et al., 2005; Silverman et al., 2009) or provided in addition to psychoeducation and/or parenting skills (Sanders & McFarland, 2000; Sanders et al., 2007; Verduyn et al., 2003) to reduce anxiety and/or depression. Jouriles et al.’s (2009) Project Support was an exception, in that it primarily offered instrumental and emotional support by a trained therapist, in addition to parenting skills to parents who were leaving a shelter for women impacted by domestic violence and psychiatric symptoms as measured by the Symptom Checklist-90 (Derogatis & Unger, 2010; e.g., depression, anxiety, somatization, and psychoticism) and trauma.

Six (42.9%) of the 14 studies that offered a parent component in service of the child’s treatment compared the intervention to a wait-list control group (Bradley et al., 2003; Bywater et al., 2009; Gardner, Burton, & Klimes, 2006; Hutchings et al., 2007; Patterson et al., 2002; Turner & Sanders, 2006), 4 (28.6%) tested the active intervention against a comparison condition (Borduin et al., 1995; Deblinger et al., 2006; Lieber-man et al., 2006; Morawska, Haslam, Mile, & Sanders, 2010), and 3 (21.4%) compared the intervention to one or more comparison groups and a wait-list control group (Barrett, Healy-Farrell, & March, 2004; Markie-Dadds & Sanders, 2006; Reid, Webster-Stratton, & Hammond, 2003).

Outcomes

Parental component in service of the child’s psychological health

The 14 studies that offered a component in service of the child’s treatment were largely mixed with respect to parental outcomes. Four (28.6%) studies found significant reductions in parental mental health symptoms in comparison to a wait-list control or comparison group at posttest (Borduin et al., 1995; Hutchings et al., 2007) and over time (Bywater et al., 2009; Lieberman et al., 2006). An additional four (28.5%) studies showed partial benefits to parents (e.g., Deblinger et al., 2006; Patterson et al., 2002). For example, parents who received 1-2-3 Magic evidenced improvement in the hostility subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory only (Bradley et al., 2003), while in a second study, parents who received Triple P evidenced significant improvements in anxiety in comparison to the wait-list control group, although there was no significant improvement in symptoms of depression (Turner & Sanders, 2006).

Two (14.3%) studies did not find any discernible change in depression (Gardner et al., 2006) or depression or anxiety over time (Morawska et al., 2010). Finally, in the remaining four (28.5%) studies, either parental mental health symptoms fell below clinical levels at baseline (Barrett et al., 2004; Markie-Dadds & Sanders, 2006) or predictors of child outcomes were studied (Harrington et al., 2000; Reid et al., 2003).

Parental component in service of the parent’s psychological health

Six (30%) studies offered a parent component in service of their psychological health. Half (n = 3, 50%) tested the standard treatment versus a treatment that was augmented with the component that addressed the parent’s emotional health (e.g., standard vs. enhanced parent training that addressed one or more adverse familial factors, including parental mental health, Sanders et al., 2007; parenting skills vs. parenting skills plus a cognitive piece to address parent depression, Sanders & McFarland, 2000; and cognitive–behavioral treatment for the child vs. the child’s treatment plus an active parent component, Silverman et al., 2009).

Results were mixed. Sanders and McFarland (2000) found that the added parent component was more effective in addressing parental depression at follow-up than the standard condition. The other two studies found parental mental health improved in both the active treatment and comparison conditions, with no significant difference between groups (Sanders et al., 2007; Silverman et al., 2009).

The other three studies contrasted the intervention with a comparison or control condition. Families in Jouriles et al.’s (2009) study were randomized to Project Support, which consisted of parenting skills, instrumental and emotional support, or monthly phone or in person contacts in which caregivers received instrumental and emotional support in addition to other services they might receive outside of the study. Barrington, Prior, Richardson, and Allen (2005) tested the impact of CBT compared to treatment as usual, which could include individual treatment and family therapy among other services. Verduyn, Barrowclough, Roberts, Tarrier, and Harrington (2003) compared CBT for mothers to parent/child groups to a no treatment condition. Similar to the previous findings, one of the three studies found greater benefits to parental mental health among the active treatment group (Jouriles et al., 2009), while the other two showed improvements in both conditions, and no significant differences between groups (Barrington et al., 2005; Verduyn et al., 2003).

Discussion and Applications to Practice

The purpose of this review was to investigate whether parent mental health is addressed within child treatments and services, the services offered to parents, and the results of these efforts. The large majority of studies that focused on parent mental health symptoms or diagnoses were among studies examining treatments for child conduct problems. Eight treatment categories in the original review, such as attention-deficit hyperac-tivity disorder, eating disorders, and bipolar disorder, did not include any study that addressed parent mental health. One interpretation of this finding is that evidence-based treatments for certain disorders, such as anorexia, are relatively newer in development and testing than treatments for conduct problems; thus, these therapies may be focused on demonstrating their efficacy and effectiveness at improving child symptoms and functioning before moving onto caregiver outcomes. Although the prior review showed a growing focus upon parental symptoms and diagnoses (Hoagwood et al., 2012), only a fraction of interventions identified and offered the parent a service. Given the increased risk of mental health problems among parents of children with psychological disorders and the possibility that improving parent mental health may strengthen youth outcomes, it is important to understand the extent to which addressing the psychological well-being of caregivers within the context of children’s treatment does make a difference.

Another notable finding was that most studies offered a parent component in service of the child’s psychological health and, most commonly, parenting skills. Again, this finding may be a reflection of the prevalence of treatments for child conduct problems (n = 15, 75%) and that parenting skills is a well-established treatment for behavioral problems among youth. While debatable whether parenting skills is also primarily for the parent (e.g., to maintain control and reduce stress), nonetheless, only six of the interventions offered a service that was focused on the parent. This result reflects a tension as to how much of an impact child mental health interventions can feasibly have on parent well-being and the level of effort required with respect to training clinicians, administrative burden, and staff time. An additional concern is reimbursement, as parental mental health treatment in the context of child treatment may not be reimbursable in all systems. The advent of the Affordable Care Act (ACA; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 2010; Rak & Coffin, 2012) requiring health insurance coverage for all adults and the Wellston-Domenici Parity Act (2013), which mandates parity for substance abuse and mental health treatments, may have a positive effect on treatment access for parents.

Another approach to the problem of providing services to both parents and children maybe the model of co-location. Offering services for children and their parents in one setting reduces logistical barriers to access and would remedy problems associated with reimbursement and training child therapists to address parental well-being.

The number of studies that compared the impact of a parent-augmented intervention to the standard treatment is too few for drawing any firm conclusions. This gap suggests a need for more research to examine the impact of parent-focused services on youth outcomes beyond that offered as part of the child’s treatment. Nonetheless, it is encouraging that all six studies that offered a parent component in service of the parent’s psychological health found some benefit. These results are stronger than parent outcomes in the 14 studies that offered a parent component for the sake of the child’s psychological health. Indeed, several studies found a partial benefit, or no benefit beyond the wait-list control group. Future research needs to be done in order to add clarity to what is currently an incomplete finding.

Implications

This review points to a systemic problem involving a narrow focus in research and practice on children’s mental health treatments and services. While a huge body of literature now substantiates the existence of effective treatments and services for children and adolescents, only a small number of these studies have also examined the combined effect of adding treatments and services targeting parent’s mental health. Child mental health providers are typically not trained to work with parents, nor even to identify caregivers who are at risk for mental health problems and refer them to services. Training for child therapists should include assessment of risk including screening for depression and other mental health symptoms or factors likely to influence both their need and their child’s need. These include domestic violence and low socioeconomic status.

As passive referrals have been shown to be largely ineffective, providers need to develop a community network of adult providers who are available to provide both a comprehensive assessment and treatment for parents. A growing number of health professionals, for example, have moved to an open-access scheduling system. In contrast to fixed appointments, which are usually made weeks or even months in advance, open-access scheduling allows patients to book same-day appointments. The rationale behind open-access scheduling is that it reduces long wait-lists for new patients, decreases missed appointments, increases patient satisfaction with services, and facilitates continuity of care, provider efficiency, and reduced costs (Qu & Shi, 2009). And for families who are identified as experiencing severe stressors, the provision of additional supports, which include both tangible assistance and addressing misperceptions about treatment and its implications, can enhance service use and family outcomes.

The absence of well-designed studies that examine the impact of treating parent mental health on children leaves many unanswered questions. When is parent treatment really likely to benefit the child and when is it not? If it does, what is the mechanism by which it does so? When is parent education and support effective on its own versus specific and targeted treatment for the parent? How can systems be created to ensure that the needs of parents as well as their children are addressed? This review points to a huge deficit in the literature on children’s treatments, which have to date been focused narrowly on a set of symptom and functioning outcomes only (Hoag-wood et al., 2012). Research targeted at issues of family mental health and system redesign to support families are greatly needed.

This review also points to the fact that not every parent will be in need of mental health care. However, standardizing detection efforts and using that information to inform treatment planning for the entire family may have a significant impact upon both parent and child outcomes.

Limitations

Some interventions were not captured because the original inclusion criteria stipulated that studies had either a 6-month or longer posttreatment follow-up assessment for treatment studies or a 6-month or longer postbaseline data point for service studies. Studies that assessed outcomes any earlier were not included in the review.

A second limitation is the generalizability of these interventions to real-world settings. Very few were conducted in community-based clinics; the large majority were grant-funded studies conducted in academic laboratories instead of community settings. Thus, it may be that child mental health providers working in the public mental health system are using different strategies to enhance parental mental health and this was not reflected in our review.

Finally, studies were coded based upon their analysis of parental emotional health and what they stated about the intervention. It is possible that some studies omitted this information and thus we were unable to capture it.

Conclusion

The ACA and restructuring of the health system provide for the first time in decades the opportunity to create integrated and coordinated health and behavioral health systems for everyone. This includes families, parents with behavioral health needs, and their children. In order to take advantage of this, it is important to have solid research findings about the services, treatments, strategies, and practices that will enable parents’ behavioral health needs and those of their children to be addressed seamlessly and continuously. The research base on treatments and services for parents in the context of children’s mental health treatments is very thin and weak. This should be a major focus for research in the future. The issues extend beyond merely providing treatments and services to parents who need them. Rather, they include attention to system redesign, to ensure that the workforce of providers, the administrative structures, and the reimbursement strategies are strengthened and connected to serve the needs of parents/caregivers and children. No other approach will suffice.

Acknowledgments

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Supported by Grant No P30 MH090322-01.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association, & American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment. 1998;10:176–181. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anxiety and Depression Association of America. Understanding the facts. 2013 Retrieved October 1, 2013, from http://www.a-daa.org/understanding-anxiety.
  4. Asarnow RF, Nuechterlein KH, Fogelson D, Subotnik KL, Payne DA, Russell AT, Kendler KS. Schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in the first-degree relatives of children with schizophrenia: The UCLA family study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2001;58:581–588. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey DB, Golden RN, Roberts J, Ford A. Maternal depression and developmental disability: Research critique. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2007;13:321–329. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrett P, Healy-Farrell L, March JS. Cognitive-behavioral family treatment of childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder: A controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2004;43:46–62. doi: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000096367.43887.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrington J, Prior M, Richardson M, Allen K. Effectiveness of CBT versus standard treatment for childhood anxiety disorders in a community clinic setting. Behavior Change. 2005;22:29–43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Beauchaine TP, Webster-Stratton C, Reid MJ. Mediators, moderators, and predictors of 1-year outcomes among children treated for early-onset conduct problems: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73:371–388. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review. 1988;8:77–100. [Google Scholar]
  10. Biederman J, Faraone SV, Mick E, Spencer T, Wilens T, Kiely K, Warburton R. High risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among children of parents with childhood onset of the disorder: A pilot study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1995;152:431–435. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.3.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Birmaher B, Axelson D, Goldstein B, Strober M, Gill MK, Hunt J, Keller M. Four-year longitudinal course of children and adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorder: The course and outcome of bipolar youth (COBY) study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;166:795. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blanch AK, Nicholson J, Purcell J. Parents with severe mental illness and their children: the need for human services integration. Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1994;21:388–396. doi: 10.1007/BF02521357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Borduin CM, Mann BJ, Cone LT, Henggeler SW, Fucci BR, Blaske DM, Williams RA. Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1995;63:569–578. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.4.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bradley SJ, Jadaa DA, Brody J, Landy S, Tallett SE, Watson W, Stephens D. Brief psychoeducational parenting program: An evaluation and 1-year follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2003;42:1171–1178. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200310000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brent DA, Kolko DJ, Birmaher B, Baugher M, Bridge J, Roth C, Holder D. Predictors of treatment efficacy in a clinical trial of three psychosocial treatments for adolescent depression. Journal of the American Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1998;37:906–914. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199809000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bywater T, Hutchings J, Daley D, Whitaker C, Yeo ST, Jones K, Edwards RT. Long-term effectiveness of a parenting intervention for children at risk of developing conduct disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;195:318–324. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.056531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chronis AM, Chacko A, Fabiano GA, Wymbs BT, Pelham WE. Enhancements to the behavioral parent training paradigm for families of children with ADHD: Review and future directions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2004;7:1–27. doi: 10.1023/b:ccfp.0000020190.60808.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Coiro MJ, Riley A, Broitman M, Miranda J. Effects on children of treating their mothers’ depression: Results of a 12-month follow-up. Psychiatric Services. 2012;63:357–363. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion: Screening for depression during and after pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;115:394–395. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d035aa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Deblinger E, Mannarino AP, Cohen JA, Steer RA. A follow-up study of a multisite, randomized, controlled trial for children with sexual abuse-related PTSD symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2006;45:1474–1484. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000240839.56114.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Derogatis LR, Unger R. Symptom checklist-90-revised. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. 2010:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  22. Earls MF. Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2010;126:1032–1039. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Foster CW, Webster MC, Weissman MM, Pilowsky DJ, Wickramaratne PJ, Talati A, King CA. Remission of maternal depression: Relations to family functioning and youth internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2009;37:714–724. doi: 10.1080/15374410802359726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gardner F, Burton J, Klimes I. Randomised controlled trial of a parenting intervention in the voluntary sector for reducing child conduct problems: Outcomes and mechanisms of change. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2006;47:1123–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Glied S, Newfeld A, McCormack S. Women with depression: Financial barriers to access. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2003;34:20–25. [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldberg D, Williams P. General health questionnaire (GHQ) Swindon, Wiltshire: nferNelson; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gopalan G, Dean-Assael K, Klingenstein K, Chacko A, McKay MM. Caregiver depression and youth behavior difficulties. Social Work in Mental Health. 2011;9:56–70. doi: 10.1080/15332985.2010.494528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gordon M, Antshel KM, Lewandowski L. Predictors of treatment outcome in a child and adolescent psychiatry clinic: A naturalistic exploration. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34:213–217. [Google Scholar]
  29. Grote NK, Bledsoe SE, Swartz HA, Frank E. Culturally relevant psychotherapy for perinatal depression in low-income OB/GYN patients. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2004;32:327–347. [Google Scholar]
  30. Harrington R, Peters S, Green J, Byford S, Woods J, McGowan R. Randomised comparison of the effectiveness and costs of community and hospital based mental health services for children with behavioural disorders. British Medical Journal. 2000;321:1047–1050. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoagwood KE, Jensen PS, Acri MC, Serene Olin S, Eric Lewandowski R, Herman RJ. Outcome domains in child mental health research since 1996: have they changed and why does it matter? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012;51:1241–1260. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hutchings J, Bywater T, Daley D, Gardner F, Whitaker C, Jones K, Edwards RT. Parenting intervention in sure start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal. 2007;334:678–682. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39126.620799.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Rosenfield D, Stephens N, Corbitt-Shindler D, Miller PC. Reducing conduct problems among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A randomized clinical trial examining effects of project support. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2009;77:705–717. doi: 10.1037/a0015994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kendall PC, Hudson JL, Gosch E, Flannery-Schroeder E, Suveg C. Cognitive- behavioral therapy for anxiety disordered youth: A randomized clinical trial evaluating child and family modalities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2008;76:282–297. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee CY, Anderson JR, Horowitz JL, August GJ. Family income and parenting: The role of parental depression and social support. Family Relations. 2009;58:417–430. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lieberman AF, Ippen CG, Van Horn P. Child-parent psychotherapy: 6-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2006;45:913–918. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000222784.03735.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marcenko MO, Lyons SJ, Courtney M. Mothers’ experiences, resources, and needs: The context for reunification. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011;33:431–438. [Google Scholar]
  38. Markie-Dadds C, Sanders MR. A controlled evaluation of an enhanced self-directed behavioural family intervention for parents of children with conduct problems in rural and remote areas. Behaviour Change. 2006;23:55–72. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mason C, Subedi S. Helping parents with mental illnesses and their children: A call for family-focused mental health care. Psychiatric Nursing. 2006;44:36–41. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20060701-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mauthner NS. Feeling low and feeling really bad about feeling low: Women’s experiences of motherhood and postpartum depression. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1999;40:143–161. [Google Scholar]
  41. McIntosh J. Postpartum depression: Women’s help-seeking behaviour and perceptions of cause. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1993;18:178–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18020178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Miranda J, Bruce ML. Gender issues and socially disadvantaged women. Mental Health Services Research. 2002;4:249–253. doi: 10.1023/a:1020976918433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Miranda J, Chung JY, Green BL, Krupnick J, Siddique J, Revicki DA, Belin T. Treating depression in predominantly low-income young minority women: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;290:57–65. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Miranda J, Green BL. The need for mental health services research focusing on poor young women. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics. 1999;2:73–80. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-176x(199906)2:2<73::aid-mhp40>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Morawska A, Haslam D, Milne D, Sanders MR. Evaluation of a brief parenting discussion group for parents of young children. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2010;32:136–145. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181f17a28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Oruche UM, Gerkensmeyer J, Stephan L, Wheeler CA, Hanna KM. The described experience of primary care-givers of children with mental health needs. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2012;26:382–391. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Patterson J, Barlow J, Mockford C, Klimes I, Pyper C, Stewart-Brown S. Improving mental health through parenting programmes: Block randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2002;87:472–477. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.6.472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pilowsky DJ, Wickramaratne P, Talati A, Tang M, Hughes CW, Garber J, Weissman MM. Children of depressed mothers 1 year after the initiation of maternal treatment: Findings from the STAR*D-child study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;165:1136–1147. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. Pub L, (111–148), 124 (2010).
  50. Qu X, Shi J. Effect of two-level provider capacities on the performance of open access clinics. Healthcare Management and Science. 2009;12:99–114. doi: 10.1007/s10729-008-9083-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rak S, Coffin J. Affordable care act. The Journal of medical practice management: MPM. 2012;28:317–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Reid MJ, Webster-Stratton C, Hammond M. Follow-up of children who received the incredible years intervention for oppositional-defiant disorder: Maintenance and prediction of 2-year outcome. Behavior Therapy. 2003;34:471–491. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rishel CW, Greeno CG, Marcus SC, Sales E, Shear MK, Swartz HA, Anderson C. Impact of maternal mental health status on child mental health treatment outcome. Community Mental Health Journal. 2006;42:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-9004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rosen D, Tolman RM, Warner LA. Low-income women’s use of substance abuse and mental health services. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2004;15:206–219. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2004.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sanders MR, Bor W, Morawska A. Maintenance of treatment gains: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed Triple P positive parenting program. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2007;35:983–998. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9148-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sanders MR, McFarland M. Treatment of depressed mothers with disruptive children: A controlled evaluation of cognitive behavioral family intervention. Behavior Therapy. 2000;31:89–112. [Google Scholar]
  57. Scharer K. What parents of mentally ill children need and want from mental health professionals. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2002;23:617–640. doi: 10.1080/01612840290052758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Scharer K. An internet discussion board for parents of mentally ill young children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing. 2005;18:17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2005.00006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Shakespeare J, Blake F, Garcia J. A qualitative study of acceptability of routine screening of postnatal women using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of General Practice. 2003;53:614–619. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Silverman WK, Kurtines WM, Jaccard J, Pina AA. Directionality of change in youth anxiety treatment involving parents: An initial examination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2009;77:474–485. doi: 10.1037/a0015761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Swartz HA, Shear MK, Frank E, Cherry CR, Scholle SH, Kupfer DJ. A pilot study of community mental health care for depression in a supermarket setting. Psychiatric Services. 2002;53:1132–1137. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.9.1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Templeton L, Velleman R, Persaud A, Milner P. The experiences of postnatal depression in women from black and minority ethnic communities in Wiltshier, UK. Ethnicity and Health. 2003;8:207–221. doi: 10.1080/1355785032000136425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Turner KMT, Sanders MR. Help when it’s needed first: A controlled evaluation of brief, preventive behavioral family intervention in a primary care setting. Behavior Therapy. 2006;37:131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Verduyn C, Barrowclough C, Roberts J, Tarrier N, Harrington R. Maternal depression and child behaviour problems: Randomised placebo-controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioural group intervention. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2003;183:342–348. doi: 10.1192/02-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, Faravelli C, Greenwald S, Hwu HG, Yeh EK. Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;276:293–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wellston-Domenici Parity Act. 2013 Retrieved December 16, 2013, from http://www.apapracticecentral.org/update/2009/11-23/well-stone-domenici.pdf.
  67. Yatchmenoff DK, Koren PE, Friesen BJ, Gordon LJ, Kinney RF. Enrichment and stress in families caring for a child with a serious emotional disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 1998;7:129–145. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES