Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Neurol. 2015 Apr 30;275(0 3):405–410. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.04.017

Endogenous neurogenic cell response in the mature mammalian brain following traumatic injury

Dong Sun 1
PMCID: PMC4627904  NIHMSID: NIHMS686345  PMID: 25936874

Abstract

In the mature mammalian brain, new neurons are generated throughout life in the neurogenic regions of the subventricular zone (SVZ) and the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus. Over the past two decades, extensive studies have examined the extent of adult neurogenesis in the SVZ and DG, the role of the adult generated new neurons in normal brain function and the underlying mechanisms regulating the process of adult neurogenesis. The extent and the function of adult neurogenesis under neuropathological conditions have also been explored in varying types of disease models in animals. Increasing evidence has indicated that these endogenous neural stem/progenitor cells may play regenerative and reparative roles in response to CNS injuries or diseases. This review will discuss the potential functions of adult neurogenesis in the injured brain and will describe the recent development of strategies aimed at harnessing this neurogenic capacity in order to repopulate and repair the injured brain following trauma.

Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, endogenous neurogenesis, subventricular zone, hippocampus, cognitive function

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with no cure available for the enduring deficits induced by TBI. It has long been thought that the mature brain cannot be repaired following injury. Recent findings have revealed that multipotent neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/NPCs) persist in selected regions of the brain throughout the lifespan of an animal, rendering the mature brain capable of generating new neurons and glia (Lois and varez-Buylla, 1993; Gage et al., 1998). Over the past 25 years, extensive studies have demonstrated that the adult generated neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus in the mature brain play important roles in hippocampal dependent learning and memory functions (Deng et al., 2009; Clelland et al., 2009; Aimone et al., 2014), whereas the subventricular zone (SVZ) derived new olfactory interneurons are required for the normal functioning of the olfactory bulb network and some selected olfactory behaviors (Moreno et al., 2009; Breton-Provencher et al., 2009; Sakamoto et al., 2014b). Following TBI, increasing evidence has suggested that these endogenous NS/NPCs may play regenerative and reparative roles in response to CNS injury as an enhanced neurogenic response has been identified in varying types of brain injury models in animal studies and also in human. Furthermore, TBI-induced hippocampal neurogenesis has been linked to the innate cognitive functional recovery following TBI. These studies indicate that the mature brain has the inherent potential to restore populations of damaged or destroyed neurons. This raises the possibility of developing therapeutic strategies aimed at harnessing this endogenous neurogenic capacity in order to regenerate and repair the injured brain.

Adult neurogenesis in the normal mammalian brain

In the mature mammalian brain, the endogenous neurogenic regions are primarily confined to the SVZ surrounding the lateral ventricle and the DG of the hippocampus (Altman and Das, 1965; Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1993). Neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/NPCs) reside in the SVZ give rise to neuronal and oligodendroglial progenies (Ortega et al., 2013). The majorities of new neurons derived from the SVZ migrate along the rostral migratory stream and are destined to the olfactory bulb becoming olfactory interneurons (Gritti et al., 2002). A small number of SVZ-derived new neurons migrate into cortical regions for reasons yet to be identified, but probably related to repair or cell renewal mechanisms (Parent et al., 2002). Likewise, the newly generated cells of the DG migrate laterally into the dentate granule cell layer and exhibit properties of fully integrated mature dentate granule neurons (Kempermann and Gage, 2000; van Praag et al., 2002). Most importantly, the newly generated DG granule neurons form synapses and extend axons into their correct target area, the CA3 region (Hastings and Gould, 1999).

Thus far, multiple studies have quantified the degree of cytogenesis occurring in these regions and have clearly shown that large numbers of new cells are constantly produced (Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1993; Cameron and McKay, 2001). Specifically, the rat dentate gyrus produces ~9000 new cells per day which equates to ~270,000 cells per month (Cameron and McKay, 2001). Considering that the total granule cell population in the rat is 1–2 million cells, this degree of new cell addition is certainly large enough to affect network function. A more recent study found that in the olfactory bulb almost the entire granule cell population in the deep layer and half of the super layer were replaced by newly adult generated neurons over a 12-month period (Imayoshi et al., 2008). The same study also reported that in the hippocampus, the adult generated neurons comprised about 10% of the total number of dentate granule cells and they were equally present along the anterior-posterior axis of the DG (Imayoshi et al., 2008). However, studies have also found that in normal adult rodent brains under normal housing condition, approximately half of the newly generated neurons in the DG and olfactory bound SVZ cells have a transient existence of two weeks or less (Gould et al., 2001; Mouret et al., 2008; Sultan et al., 2011b; Dayer et al., 2003). While this interval is long enough for supportive glial roles; neuron formation and integration into an existing network takes approximately 10–14 days (Alvarez-Buylla and Nottebohm, 1988; Kirn et al., 1999). It must be noted, however, that most of the surviving neurons become mature neurons and are sustained for months to years (Gould et al., 2001; Dayer et al., 2003; Sultan et al., 2011a), strongly supporting the theory of network integration. Furthermore, this dramatic loss of newly generated cells might be a recapitulation of network pruning seen in early mammalian development. Whether the limited life-span represents network pruning or merely distinct cell specific roles is yet to be understood.

Following the discovery of persistent adult neurogenesis throughout life in the mature mammalian brain, the physiological roles and the importance of this adult neurogenesis particularly hippocampal neurogenesis in relationship with learning and memory functions has been extensively studied. Studies have shown that conditions which enhance hippocampal neurogenesis such as exposure to enriched environments, physical exercise, or growth factor treatment, can improve cognitive abilities (van et al., 1999; Kempermann et al., 1997; Brown et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2009). Additionally, studies that aim to inhibit adult neurogenesis using varying types of approaches have further confirmed the causal relationship between neurogenesis and hippocampal function. For example, in studies that use either brain irradiation, systemic or focal administration of anti-mitotic agents, or genetic ablation of dividing progenitor cells to eliminate adult neurogenesis, it has been shown that adult-generated dentate granule neurons have important roles on many types of hippocampal-dependent learning and memory tasks in rodents. These include trace eyeblink and fear conditioning (Shors et al., 2001; Shors et al., 2002), formation of contextual fear memory (Saxe et al., 2006; Imayoshi et al., 2008; Hernandez-Rabaza et al., 2009), long-term retention of spatial memory in the water maze task (Snyder et al., 2005; Jessberger et al., 2009), object recognition task (Jessberger et al., 2009; Suarez-Pereira et al., 2014) and active place avoidance task (Burghardt et al., 2012). Moreover, targeted deletion of adult generated dentate granule neurons at the maturation stage induced retrograde memory deficits in contextual fear, water maze and visual discrimination memories (Arruda-Carvalho et al., 2011). Although some variable and partially contradictory results have been reported from these studies due to the methods used to knockdown neurogenesis or the nature of behavioral tasks, this growing body of data provides compelling evidence that adult hippocampal neurogenesis is directly involved in many aspects of hippocampal-dependent learning and memory functions.

Compared to hippocampal neurogenesis, the role of SVZ neurogenesis in normal brain is less defined. The majority of newly generated neurons derived from the SVZ reaches the olfactory bulb and differentiates into granule cells; approximately 5% become periglomerular cells in the olfactory bulb (Moreno et al., 2009; Lemasson et al., 2005). The newly generated olfactory inhibitory interneurons integrate into the olfactory circuity and are involved in some, but not all, olfactory functions. Studies that inhibit olfactory neurogenesis using similar approaches as hippocampal neurogenesis inhibition have found that adult generated neurons in the olfactory bulb are involved in olfactory discrimination (Gheusi et al., 2000; Moreno et al., 2009; Kageyama et al., 2012), olfactory perceptual learning functions and the acquisition of new odor-related behaviors (Moreno et al., 2009; Moreno et al., 2012), innate olfactory responses (Sakamoto et al., 2011), short-term olfactory memory function (Breton-Provencher et al., 2009), flexible olfactory associative learning and memory function (Sakamoto et al., 2014a).

The proliferation and maturational fate of cells within the SVZ and DG is modulated by a number of physical and chemical cues. For example, biochemical factors such as serotonin, glucocorticoids, ovarian steroids, and growth factors tightly regulate the proliferative response, suggesting that cell proliferation within these regions have a physiologic importance (Banasr et al., 2001; Tanapat et al., 1999; Cameron and Gould, 1994; Kuhn et al., 1997). In addition, physical stimuli such as exercise, enriched environment, or stress produce alterations in cell production suggesting a role in network adaptation (Gould et al., 1997; Kempermann et al., 1997; van et al., 1999; Kempermann et al., 2000). For example, physical exercise or environments that are cognitively and physically enriched increase cell proliferation and neurogenesis in both the SVZ and DG, while stress reduces this type of cellular response (Kempermann et al., 1997; Gould et al., 1999; Gould and Tanapat, 1999; Kempermann et al., 1998). Nevertheless, a functional role for these new cells is dependent upon a significant number of cells being generated, their survival, differentiation and integration into existing neuronal circuitry.

TBI-induced neurogenesis in experimental studies in TBI animal models

Studies from our lab and others have shown that TBI significantly increases cell proliferation in both the SVZ and DG in adult mice and rats in varying TBI models including fluid percussive injury (FPI) (Chirumamilla et al., 2002; Rice et al., 2003), controlled cortical impact injury (CCI) (Dash et al., 2001; Gao et al., 2009), closed head weight drop injury (Villasana et al., 2014) and acceleration-impact injury (Bye et al., 2011). Common to all reported TBI models, the most prominent endogenous cell response in both the DG and SVZ following TBI is an increase in cell proliferation. This injury-enhanced cell proliferation is relatively transient and is observed during the first week post-injury, with a peak time at 2 days in the DG in both rat FPI and mouse CCI models (Sun et al., 2005; Gao and Chen, 2013). In FPI model, increased cell proliferation in the SVZ also peaks at 2 days post-injury (Sun et al., 2005), and this injury-induced proliferative response persists for up to 1 year (Chen et al., 2003). As for the degree of neuronal differentiation, different results have been reported. In diffuse injury models such as the closed head weight drop model and the fluid percussion model, an increased total number of new neurons in the subgranule zone and granule cell layer of the DG were observed following injury (Sun et al., 2007; Villasana et al., 2014). Whereas in a focal injury model such as CCI, the number of new neurons generated following TBI was not significantly increased as compared to sham control despite enhanced cell proliferation (Gao and Chen, 2013). This discrepancy is likely due to variations of model differences, severity of injury, post-injury time point for tissue assessment, cell markers used and/or quantification methods. The difference of injury model on cell response is particularly significant. For example, in the CCI model, TBI induces significant death of immature neurons in the DG at an early time post-injury before injury-enhanced cell proliferation is observed (Rola et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2008). However, in a closed head diffuse injury model, increased hippocampal neurogenesis in both cell proliferation and generation of new neurons is only observed in the more severely injured animals (Villasana et al., 2014). Despite these differences, it is clear that TBI stimulates activation of endogenous neural stem cells in the neurogenic regions in the mature rodent brain.

In the normal brain, the extent of neurogenesis in the neurogenic regions decreases with increasing age. Following TBI, our lab has also found that the juvenile brain displays a more robust neurogenic response following injury than the adult and aged brain (Sun et al., 2005). This age-related difference in the degree of injury-induced endogenous cell response has also been recently reported in species with gyrencephalic brains. In this study, Costine and colleagues have found that in a cortical impact injury piglet model, TBI significantly increased cell proliferation in the SVZ in piglets that were injured at post-natal day 7 but not in animals injured at 4 months old (Costine et al., 2015). Furthermore, we and others have found that injury-induced newly generated granular cells integrate into the existing hippocampal circuitry (Emery et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2007), and this endogenous neurogenesis is directly associated with the innate cognitive recovery observed following injury (Blaiss et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2015). Although TBI-enhanced cell proliferation and generation of new neurons are observed in these TBI models, unlike stroke where robust generation and migration of new neurons from the SVZ to the site of ischemic injury is observed (Parent et al., 2002), in TBI models, migration of newly generated neurons to the site of injury is not significant although increased number of migrating neurons are observed along the white matter tract (Costine et al., 2015; Ramaswamy et al., 2005). Nevertheless, these studies have strongly indicated the inherent attempts of the mature brain to repair and regenerate following injury through the endogenous neurogenic response. This notion is supported by the evidence that the level of injury-enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis is correlated to the increased expression of the activity-dependent early gene, c-fos, in the hippocampus following injury (Villasana et al., 2014).

Neurogenesis in human brain

Compared to rodent brains, the degree and function of adult neurogenesis in the human brain is less clear. Similar to rodent brains, the SVZ and the hippocampus in human brains are the active neurogenic regions (Eriksson et al., 1998; Sanai et al., 2004). Proliferating NS/NPCs have been found in these areas from autopsy brain samples. Under culture conditions, cells isolated from the adult human brain are capable of generating both neurons and glia (Kukekov et al., 1999; Nunes et al., 2003; Murrell et al., 2013). Using a groundbreaking birth-dating method by measuring the concentration of nuclear bomb- test-derived carbon-14 (14C) that is lastingly incorporated into the DNA of dividing cells, researchers at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden have published a series of studies examining neurogenesis in human brains. They have reported that in human brains, substantial hippocampal neurogenesis is observed with a modest decline during aging and that the rate of adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus is comparable between middle-aged humans and mice (Spalding et al., 2013). However, the degree of neurogenesis in the SVZ and the subsequent migration of newly generated neurons from SVZ to the neocortex and olfactory bulbs are rather limited and are only observed in the early childhood (Bhardwaj et al., 2006; Sanai et al., 2011; Bergmann et al., 2012). Surprisingly, in the striatum of the adult human brain, unlike other species, a robust generation of new neurons is observed in areas adjacent to the SVZ, and these adult-generated striatal interneurons are depleted in the brains of patients with Huntington’s disease (Ernst et al., 2014).

Due to the difficulties of obtaining human brain samples as well as technical challenges to birth-dating NS/NPCs, there are very few studies reporting endogenous neurogenesis following TBI in human subjects. Using doublecortin (DCX), a marker for neural progenitor cells and migrating neuroblasts, Taylor and colleagues have found that the number of DCX+ cells in the SVZ, hippocampus and the periventricular white matter is closely related to the age of the patients with the brains in younger children having more DCX+ cells in these regions than those in older children. Whereas brain trauma had no effect on the number of DCX+ cells in TBI patient samples although abundant DCX+ cells were found in brain regions around a focal infarct lesion in a non-TBI patient (Taylor et al., 2013). Contrary to this, Zheng and colleagues have reported an increased number of DCX+ cells in the injured cerebral cortex from TBI patients (Zheng et al., 2013). The discrepancy of these two studies may be due to the source of tissues, markers used or potential artifacts associated with postmortem intervals. From the limited studies examining post-TBI endogenous neurogenesis in human brain, clear evidence of TBI-induced generation of new neurons in humans is lacking. Nevertheless, this does not completely rule out the possibility of a small scale injury-induced generation of new neurons in human brains, given the evidence of persistent neurogenesis existing in neurogenic regions and the ectopic generation of new striatal neurons in mature human brains (Spalding et al., 2013; Ernst et al., 2014), as well as the observed new neurons in brain regions around lesions of focal infarction (Taylor et al., 2013) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (Sgubin et al., 2007).

Regulation of TBI-induced neurogenesis

The underlying mechanisms regulating adult neurogenesis are not fully understood. Many transcriptional, genetic regulation and signaling pathways that are important for neurogenesis during development are also implicated in regulating neurogenesis in the mature brain (Mu et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2010; Kempermann, 2011; Hsieh, 2012; Faigle and Song, 2013; Aimone et al., 2014). Apart from these physiological regulatory mechanisms, TBI triggers additional pathways that regulate/affect a neurogenic response in the injured brain. For example, in the injured brain, studies have found that elevated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF signaling pathway is involved in mediating survival of de novo newly generated granule neurons rather than proliferation of neuroblasts following LFPI (Lee and Agoston, 2010). Using transgenic animals, studies have found that neurotrophin p75 receptor (p75 (NTR)) can influence endogenous neurogenesis at all stages and its expression is induced in the injured brain where it regulates cell survival (Catts et al., 2008), and intranasal administration of LM11A-3, a small molecule p75 (NTR) ligand can enhanced long-term hippocampal neurogenesis and reversed spatial memory impairments (Shi et al., 2013). Transgenic animals studies have also demonstrated that Ephrins and Eph receptors B3 (EphrinB3-EphB3) signaling is involved in regulating cell proliferation and survival of cells in the SVZ in adult brain by negatively regulating cell cycle progression and apoptosis (Ricard et al., 2006). Following TBI, the EphB3 expression in the SVZ is transiently reduced and the EphB3 signaling is down regulated, whereas expansion and survival of endogenous adult stem cells in the SVZ is observed (Theus et al., 2010). Other growth factors such as bFGF, EGF, IGF-1, BDNF were reported to be involved in regulating post-TBI neurogenesis by enhancing generation of new neurons, and/or promoting survival of new neurons in the injured brain (Carlson et al., 2014; Gao and Chen, 2009; Sun et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2010).

Enhancement of endogenous neurogenesis as potential therapeutic strategies for TBI

The regenerative capacity of the adult brain through endogenous neurogenesis is of particular interest with regards to TBI. As adult generated neurons from both the SVZ and DG have functional roles, harnessing this endogenous population of cells to repopulate the damaged brain is an attractive strategy to repair and regenerate the injured brain. As the spontaneous innate recovery capacity of the brain is rather limited, it is imperative to augment this endogenous process via exogenous means. Thus far, many factors have been identified to be able to enhance neurogenesis, particularly hippocampal neurogenesis together with cognitive functional improvement. Among these factors, many types of growth factors have shown effectiveness in enhancing neurogenesis and improving functional recovery of the injured brain following trauma. Studies from our lab have shown that intraventricular infusion of growth factors bFGF, or EGF can significantly enhance TBI-induced cell proliferation in the hippocampus and the SVZ, and drastically improve cognitive functional recovery of the injured adult animals (Sun et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2010). Intraventricular infusion of S100β can enhance cell proliferation and generation of new neurons in the hippocampus and improve the functional recovery of animals following TBI (Kleindienst et al., 2005). Studies have also reported that post-TBI infusion of recombinant VEGF improves functional recovery of injured animals concomitant with increased cell proliferation in the SVZ (Thau-Zuchman et al., 2010), and enhanced survival of newly generated neurons in the DG (Lee and Agoston, 2010).

Apart from these aforementioned growth factors, several drugs that are currently in clinic trials for treating TBI or other neurological conditions have shown effects in enhancing neurogenesis and cognitive function in TBI animals including statins (Lu et al., 2007), erythropoietin (Lu et al., 2005; Xiong et al., 2010), and anti-depressant imipramine (Han et al., 2011) etc. In a rat CCI model, post-injury treatment with Statins (simvastatin and atorvastatin) at 1 day after and daily for 14 days significantly enhances the total number of BrdU+ cells and BrdU+/NeuN+ cells in the DG and improves spatial learning function (Lu et al., 2007). Similar results were reported in animals receiving erythropoietin treatment at day 1 or days 1–3 following CCI (Lu et al., 2005; Xiong et al., 2010). In a mouse CCI model, imipramine, a commonly used tricyclic antidepressant, was administrated for either 2 or 4 weeks after injury and animals in both treatment regimens have shown significantly improved cognitive function and increased cell proliferation and total number of newly generated neurons in the DG (Han et al., 2011). Other reagents or strategies which have beneficial effect for TBI such as hypothermia, environment enrichment, transcranial low-level laser treatment, CNTF-like peptide 6, a P7C3-class of aminopropyl carbazole agents are also shown to influence the endogenous neural stem cell response in the injured animals (Bregy et al., 2012; Kovesdi et al., 2011; Xuan et al., 2014; Blaya et al., 2014; Chohan et al., 2014). For example, post-TBI hypothermia treatment increases survival of newly generated neurons (Bregy et al., 2012). Intraventricular infusion of angiotensin receptor type 2 agonist (CGP42112A) for 3 days following a closed head injury induces cell proliferation in both the SVZ and DG, and increases the total number of new neurons in a dose-dependent manner (Umschweif et al., 2014). Post-TBI treatment with the P7C3 class of aminopropyl carbazole agents (P7C3-A20) 30min post LFPI for 7 days increases cell proliferation and survival of newly generated neurons in the SGZ (Blaya et al., 2014). In a CCI model, transcranial laser treatment post-TBI has also shown increasing cell proliferation and generation of new neurons in the SVZ and DG (Xuan et al., 2014). Collectively, these strategies all significantly improved cognitive functional recovery of injured animals with increased mobilization of endogenous stem cell pools. Although many of these aforementioned treatment strategies also exert neuroprotective and/or neural plasticity effects which would contribute to improved functional recovery, for example, EGF, statin or erythropoietin treatment reduces TBI-induced mature neuronal cell loss (Sun et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2005), whereas VEGF, LM11A-3, P7C3-A20 or transcranial laser treatment decreases contusion lesion volume and number of degenerating neurons (Thau-Zuchman et al., 2010; Xuan et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2013; Blaya et al., 2014); nevertheless, the association of enhanced endogenous neurogenesis and improved cognitive functional recovery from these studies strongly suggest that augmenting the endogenous repair response could be an attractive strategy for treating TBI.

While ample studies have shown the beneficial effect of enhancing injury-induced endogenous neurogenesis for post-TBI functional recovery, it is not clear whether there is any long term adverse consequence of this cell response. It is known that epilepsy or seizure activity is accompanied with enhanced aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis (Parent et al., 1997; Parent, 2008), whereas ablating this seizure –induced aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis can reduce chronic seizure frequency and normalize epilepsy-induced cognitive deficits (Cho et al., 2015). It has been speculated that TBI-induced neurogenesis may contribute to the onset of post-TBI epilepsy (Pitkanen et al., 2014). If so, further augmenting TBI-induced hippocampal neurogenesis may exacerbate this symptom. Another long term concern is the limitation of NSC pool in the mature brain. In the neurogenic niches, NSCs that proliferate in normal condition generally undergo asymmetric divisions to self-renew and generate committed progenitor cells (Kempermann et al., 2004; Alvarez-Buylla et al., 2001). When the balance of self-renewal and generation of daughter cells is not properly maintained by exogenous stimuli, the NSC pool could be exhausted leading to deletion of neurogenesis in long term which would be detrimental. Although there is no direct evidence linking neurogenesis to post-TBI epilepsy or post-TBI treatment induced depletion of neurogenic pools, caution needs to be taken when implementing therapies targeting endogenous neurogenesis.

Conclusion

Endogenous neurogenesis persists throughout life in the adult mammalian brain. The adult generated cells become functional neurons that participate in neural network function. The level of adult neurogenesis increases following TBI and has a direct role in the spontaneous cognitive functional recovery observed following brain insults. Augmenting or manipulating this endogenous cell response could be a promising avenue for researchers seeking to develop new therapies for brain repair and regeneration following brain injury. Thus far, published studies were mostly limited to enhancing cell proliferation, survival of new neurons in the neurogenic niche. As neural stem cells and their progenies are regionally specific, they generate and migrate to specific regions. For brain repair, it is imperative that these injury-enhanced neural stem cells can migrate to the site of injury, survive and become functional neurons replacing cells lost to injury. Future studies should focus on strategies which can attract or guide endogenous neural stem cell migration to the site of injury.

Acknowledgments

Studies published by the author were funded by the National Institutes of Health Grant No. NS055086, NS078710 (D. Sun).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Reference List

  1. Aimone JB, Li Y, Lee SW, Clemenson GD, Deng W, Gage FH. Regulation and function of adult neurogenesis: from genes to cognition. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:991–1026. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman J, Das GD. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J Comp Neurol. 1965;124:319–335. doi: 10.1002/cne.901240303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez-Buylla A, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Tramontin AD. A unified hypothesis on the lineage of neural stem cells. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:287–293. doi: 10.1038/35067582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez-Buylla A, Nottebohm F. Migration of young neurons in adult avian brain. Nature. 1988;335:353–354. doi: 10.1038/335353a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arruda-Carvalho M, Sakaguchi M, Akers KG, Josselyn SA, Frankland PW. Posttraining ablation of adult-generated neurons degrades previously acquired memories. J Neurosci. 2011;31:15113–15127. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Banasr M, Hery M, Brezun JM, Daszuta A. Serotonin mediates oestrogen stimulation of cell proliferation in the adult dentate gyrus 12. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;14:1417–1424. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01763.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergmann O, Liebl J, Bernard S, Alkass K, Yeung MS, Steier P, Kutschera W, Johnson L, Landen M, Druid H, Spalding KL, Frisen J. The age of olfactory bulb neurons in humans. Neuron. 2012;74:634–639. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhardwaj RD, Curtis MA, Spalding KL, Buchholz BA, Fink D, Bjork-Eriksson T, Nordborg C, Gage FH, Druid H, Eriksson PS, Frisen J. Neocortical neurogenesis in humans is restricted to development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12564–12568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605177103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blaiss CA, Yu TS, Zhang G, Chen J, Dimchev G, Parada LF, Powell CM, Kernie SG. Temporally specified genetic ablation of neurogenesis impairs cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2011;31:4906–4916. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5265-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blaya MO, Bramlett HM, Naidoo J, Pieper AA, Dietrich WD. Neuroprotective efficacy of a proneurogenic compound after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:476–486. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bregy A, Nixon R, Lotocki G, Alonso OF, Atkins CM, Tsoulfas P, Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD. Posttraumatic hypothermia increases doublecortin expressing neurons in the dentate gyrus after traumatic brain injury in the rat. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:821–828. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Breton-Provencher V, Lemasson M, Peralta MR, III, Saghatelyan A. Interneurons produced in adulthood are required for the normal functioning of the olfactory bulb network and for the execution of selected olfactory behaviors. J Neurosci. 2009;29:15245–15257. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3606-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown J, Cooper-Kuhn CM, Kempermann G, van PH, Winkler J, Gage FH, Kuhn HG. Enriched environment and physical activity stimulate hippocampal but not olfactory bulb neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:2042–2046. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02647.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burghardt NS, Park EH, Hen R, Fenton AA. Adult-born hippocampal neurons promote cognitive flexibility in mice. Hippocampus. 2012;22:1795–1808. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bye N, Carron S, Han X, Agyapomaa D, Ng SY, Yan E, Rosenfeld JV, Morganti-Kossmann MC. Neurogenesis and glial proliferation are stimulated following diffuse traumatic brain injury in adult rats. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89:986–1000. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cameron HA, Gould E. Adult neurogenesis is regulated by adrenal steroids in the dentate gyrus. Neuroscience. 1994;61:203–209. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cameron HA, McKay RD. Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. 2001;435:406–417. doi: 10.1002/cne.1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlson SW, Madathil SK, Sama DM, Gao X, Chen J, Saatman KE. Conditional overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-1 enhances hippocampal neurogenesis and restores immature neuron dendritic processes after traumatic brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014;73:734–746. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Catts VS, Al-Menhali N, Burne TH, Colditz MJ, Coulson EJ. The p75 neurotrophin receptor regulates hippocampal neurogenesis and related behaviours. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:883–892. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen XH, Iwata A, Nonaka M, Browne KD, Smith DH. Neurogenesis and glial proliferation persist for at least one year in the subventricular zone following brain trauma in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20:623–631. doi: 10.1089/089771503322144545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chirumamilla S, Sun D, Bullock MR, Colello RJ. Traumatic brain injury induced cell proliferation in the adult mammalian central nervous system. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:693–703. doi: 10.1089/08977150260139084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cho KO, Lybrand ZR, Ito N, Brulet R, Tafacory F, Zhang L, Good L, Ure K, Kernie SG, Birnbaum SG, Scharfman HE, Eisch AJ, Hsieh J. Aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis contributes to epilepsy and associated cognitive decline. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6606. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chohan MO, Bragina O, Kazim SF, Statom G, Baazaoui N, Bragin D, Iqbal K, Nemoto E, Yonas H. Enhancement of Neurogenesis and Memory by a Neurotrophic Peptide in Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurosurgery. 2014 doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Clelland CD, Choi M, Romberg C, Clemenson GD, Jr, Fragniere A, Tyers P, Jessberger S, Saksida LM, Barker RA, Gage FH, Bussey TJ. A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science. 2009;325:210–213. doi: 10.1126/science.1173215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Costine BA, Missios S, Taylor SR, McGuone D, Smith CM, Dodge CP, Harris BT, Duhaime AC. The Subventricular Zone in the Immature Piglet Brain: Anatomy and Exodus of Neuroblasts into White Matter after Traumatic Brain Injury. Dev Neurosci. 2015 doi: 10.1159/000369091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dash PK, Mach SA, Moore AN. Enhanced neurogenesis in the rodent hippocampus following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 2001;63:313–319. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20010215)63:4<313::AID-JNR1025>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dayer AG, Ford AA, Cleaver KM, Yassaee M, Cameron HA. Short-term and long-term survival of new neurons in the rat dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. 2003;460:563–572. doi: 10.1002/cne.10675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Deng W, Saxe MD, Gallina IS, Gage FH. Adult-born hippocampal dentate granule cells undergoing maturation modulate learning and memory in the brain. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13532–13542. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3362-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Emery DL, Fulp CT, Saatman KE, Schutz C, Neugebauer E, McIntosh TK. Newly born granule cells in the dentate gyrus rapidly extend axons into the hippocampal CA3 region following experimental brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:978–988. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Bjork-Eriksson T, Alborn AM, Nordborg C, Peterson DA, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med. 1998;4:1313–1317. doi: 10.1038/3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ernst A, Alkass K, Bernard S, Salehpour M, Perl S, Tisdale J, Possnert G, Druid H, Frisen J. Neurogenesis in the striatum of the adult human brain. Cell. 2014;156:1072–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Faigle R, Song H. Signaling mechanisms regulating adult neural stem cells and neurogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830:2435–2448. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gage FH, Kempermann G, Palmer TD, Peterson DA, Ray J. Multipotent progenitor cells in the adult dentate gyrus. J Neurobiol. 1998;36:249–266. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199808)36:2<249::aid-neu11>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao X, Chen J. Conditional knockout of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus increases death of adult-born immature neurons following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:1325–1335. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gao X, Chen J. Moderate traumatic brain injury promotes neural precursor proliferation without increasing neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Exp Neurol. 2013;239:38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gao X, Deng-Bryant Y, Cho W, Carrico KM, Hall ED, Chen J. Selective death of newborn neurons in hippocampal dentate gyrus following moderate experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86:2258–2270. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gao X, Enikolopov G, Chen J. Moderate traumatic brain injury promotes proliferation of quiescent neural progenitors in the adult hippocampus. Exp Neurol. 2009;219:516–523. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gheusi G, Cremer H, McLean H, Chazal G, Vincent JD, Lledo PM. Importance of newly generated neurons in the adult olfactory bulb for odor discrimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:1823–1828. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gould E, Tanapat P. Stress and hippocampal neurogenesis. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:1472–1479. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00247-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gould E, Tanapat P, Cameron HA. Adrenal steroids suppress granule cell death in the developing dentate gyrus through an NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1997;103:91–93. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(97)00079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gould E, Tanapat P, Hastings NB, Shors TJ. Neurogenesis in adulthood: a possible role in learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:186–192. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01310-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gould E, Vail N, Wagers M, Gross CG. Adult-generated hippocampal and neocortical neurons in macaques have a transient existence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10910–10917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181354698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gritti A, Bonfanti L, Doetsch F, Caille I, varez-Buylla A, Lim DA, Galli R, Verdugo JM, Herrera DG, Vescovi AL. Multipotent neural stem cells reside into the rostral extension and olfactory bulb of adult rodents. J Neurosci. 2002;22:437–445. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-02-00437.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Han X, Tong J, Zhang J, Farahvar A, Wang E, Yang J, Samadani U, Smith DH, Huang JH. Imipramine treatment improves cognitive outcome associated with enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:995–1007. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hastings NB, Gould E. Rapid extension of axons into the CA3 region by adult-generated granule cells 56. J Comp Neurol. 1999;413:146–154. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19991011)413:1<146::aid-cne10>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hernandez-Rabaza V, Llorens-Martin M, Velazquez-Sanchez C, Ferragud A, Arcusa A, Gumus HG, Gomez-Pinedo U, Perez-Villalba A, Rosello J, Trejo JL, Barcia JA, Canales JJ. Inhibition of adult hippocampal neurogenesis disrupts contextual learning but spares spatial working memory, long-term conditional rule retention and spatial reversal. Neuroscience. 2009;159:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.11.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hsieh J. Orchestrating transcriptional control of adult neurogenesis. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1010–1021. doi: 10.1101/gad.187336.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Imayoshi I, Sakamoto M, Ohtsuka T, Takao K, Miyakawa T, Yamaguchi M, Mori K, Ikeda T, Itohara S, Kageyama R. Roles of continuous neurogenesis in the structural and functional integrity of the adult forebrain. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:1153–1161. doi: 10.1038/nn.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jessberger S, Clark RE, Broadbent NJ, Clemenson GD, Jr, Consiglio A, Lie DC, Squire LR, Gage FH. Dentate gyrus-specific knockdown of adult neurogenesis impairs spatial and object recognition memory in adult rats. Learn Mem. 2009;16:147–154. doi: 10.1101/lm.1172609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kageyama R, Imayoshi I, Sakamoto M. The role of neurogenesis in olfaction-dependent behaviors. Behav Brain Res. 2012;227:459–463. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kempermann G. Seven principles in the regulation of adult neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:1018–1024. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kempermann G, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Novartis Found Symp. 2000;231:220–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kempermann G, Jessberger S, Steiner B, Kronenberg G. Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:447–452. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997;386:493–495. doi: 10.1038/386493a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. Experience-induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3206–3212. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03206.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kempermann G, van PH, Gage FH. Activity-dependent regulation of neuronal plasticity and self repair. Prog Brain Res. 2000;127:35–48. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(00)27004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kirn JR, Fishman Y, Sasportas K, Alvarez-Buylla A, Nottebohm F. Fate of new neurons in adult canary high vocal center during the first 30 days after their formation. J Comp Neurol. 1999;411:487–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kleindienst A, McGinn MJ, Harvey HB, Colello RJ, Hamm RJ, Bullock MR. Enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis by intraventricular S100B infusion is associated with improved cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:645–655. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kovesdi E, Gyorgy AB, Kwon SK, Wingo DL, Kamnaksh A, Long JB, Kasper CE, Agoston DV. The effect of enriched environment on the outcome of traumatic brain injury; a behavioral, proteomics, and histological study. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:42. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kuhn HG, Winkler J, Kempermann G, Thal LJ, Gage FH. Epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2 have different effects on neural progenitors in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5820–5829. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-15-05820.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kukekov VG, Laywell ED, Suslov O, Davies K, Scheffler B, Thomas LB, O’Brien TF, Kusakabe M, Steindler DA. Multipotent stem/progenitor cells with similar properties arise from two neurogenic regions of adult human brain. Exp Neurol. 1999;156:333–344. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1999.7028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lee C, Agoston DV. Vascular endothelial growth factor is involved in mediating increased de novo hippocampal neurogenesis in response to traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:541–553. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.0905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lemasson M, Saghatelyan A, Olivo-Marin JC, Lledo PM. Neonatal and adult neurogenesis provide two distinct populations of newborn neurons to the mouse olfactory bulb. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6816–6825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1114-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A. Proliferating subventricular zone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:2074–2077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lois C, varez-Buylla A. Proliferating subventricular zone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:2074–2077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lu D, Mahmood A, Qu C, Goussev A, Schallert T, Chopp M. Erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and restores spatial memory in rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:1011–1017. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lu D, Qu C, Goussev A, Jiang H, Lu C, Schallert T, Mahmood A, Chen J, Li Y, Chopp M. Statins increase neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, reduce delayed neuronal death in the hippocampal CA3 region, and improve spatial learning in rat after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1132–1146. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ma DK, Marchetto MC, Guo JU, Ming GL, Gage FH, Song H. Epigenetic choreographers of neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1338–1344. doi: 10.1038/nn.2672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Moreno MM, Bath K, Kuczewski N, Sacquet J, Didier A, Mandairon N. Action of the noradrenergic system on adult-born cells is required for olfactory learning in mice. J Neurosci. 2012;32:3748–3758. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6335-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Moreno MM, Linster C, Escanilla O, Sacquet J, Didier A, Mandairon N. Olfactory perceptual learning requires adult neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17980–17985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907063106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mouret A, Gheusi G, Gabellec MM, de CF, Olivo-Marin JC, Lledo PM. Learning and survival of newly generated neurons: when time matters. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11511–11516. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2954-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Mu Y, Lee SW, Gage FH. Signaling in adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010;20:416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Murrell W, Palmero E, Bianco J, Stangeland B, Joel M, Paulson L, Thiede B, Grieg Z, Ramsnes I, Skjellegrind HK, Nygard S, Brandal P, Sandberg C, Vik-Mo E, Palmero S, Langmoen IA. Expansion of multipotent stem cells from the adult human brain. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Nunes MC, Roy NS, Keyoung HM, Goodman RR, McKhann G, Jiang L, Kang J, Nedergaard M, Goldman SA. Identification and isolation of multipotential neural progenitor cells from the subcortical white matter of the adult human brain. Nat Med. 2003;9:439–447. doi: 10.1038/nm837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ortega F, Gascon S, Masserdotti G, Deshpande A, Simon C, Fischer J, Dimou L, Chichung LD, Schroeder T, Berninger B. Oligodendrogliogenic and neurogenic adult subependymal zone neural stem cells constitute distinct lineages and exhibit differential responsiveness to Wnt signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:602–613. doi: 10.1038/ncb2736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Parent JM. Persistent hippocampal neurogenesis and epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2008;49(Suppl 5):1–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Parent JM, Vexler ZS, Gong C, Derugin N, Ferriero DM. Rat forebrain neurogenesis and striatal neuron replacement after focal stroke. Ann Neurol. 2002;52:802–813. doi: 10.1002/ana.10393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Parent JM, Yu TW, Leibowitz RT, Geschwind DH, Sloviter RS, Lowenstein DH. Dentate granule cell neurogenesis is increased by seizures and contributes to aberrant network reorganization in the adult rat hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1997;17:3727–3738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03727.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Pitkanen A, Kemppainen S, Ndode-Ekane XE, Huusko N, Huttunen JK, Grohn O, Immonen R, Sierra A, Bolkvadze T. Posttraumatic epilepsy - disease or comorbidity? Epilepsy Behav. 2014;38:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ramaswamy S, Goings GE, Soderstrom KE, Szele FG, Kozlowski DA. Cellular proliferation and migration following a controlled cortical impact in the mouse. Brain Res. 2005;1053:38–53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ricard J, Salinas J, Garcia L, Liebl DJ. EphrinB3 regulates cell proliferation and survival in adult neurogenesis. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2006;31:713–722. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rice AC, Khaldi A, Harvey HB, Salman NJ, White F, Fillmore H, Bullock MR. Proliferation and neuronal differentiation of mitotically active cells following traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2003;183:406–417. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4886(03)00241-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rola R, Mizumatsu S, Otsuka S, Morhardt DR, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, Fishman K, Potts MB, Fike JR. Alterations in hippocampal neurogenesis following traumatic brain injury in mice. Exp Neurol. 2006;202:189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sakamoto M, Imayoshi I, Ohtsuka T, Yamaguchi M, Mori K, Kageyama R. Continuous neurogenesis in the adult forebrain is required for innate olfactory responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:8479–8484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018782108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sakamoto M, Ieki N, Miyoshi G, Mochimaru D, Miyachi H, Imura T, Yamaguchi M, Fishell G, Mori K, Kageyama R, Imayoshi I. Continuous postnatal neurogenesis contributes to formation of the olfactory bulb neural circuits and flexible olfactory associative learning. J Neurosci. 2014a;34:5788–5799. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0674-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sakamoto M, Kageyama R, Imayoshi I. The functional significance of newly born neurons integrated into olfactory bulb circuits. Front Neurosci. 2014b;8:121. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sanai N, Nguyen T, Ihrie RA, Mirzadeh Z, Tsai HH, Wong M, Gupta N, Berger MS, Huang E, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Rowitch DH, Alvarez-Buylla A. Corridors of migrating neurons in the human brain and their decline during infancy. Nature. 2011;478:382–386. doi: 10.1038/nature10487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sanai N, Tramontin AD, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Barbaro NM, Gupta N, Kunwar S, Lawton MT, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Manuel-Garcia VJ, Berger MS, varez-Buylla A. Unique astrocyte ribbon in adult human brain contains neural stem cells but lacks chain migration. Nature. 2004;427:740–744. doi: 10.1038/nature02301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Saxe MD, Battaglia F, Wang JW, Malleret G, David DJ, Monckton JE, Garcia AD, Sofroniew MV, Kandel ER, Santarelli L, Hen R, Drew MR. Ablation of hippocampal neurogenesis impairs contextual fear conditioning and synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17501–17506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607207103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Sgubin D, Aztiria E, Perin A, Longatti P, Leanza G. Activation of endogenous neural stem cells in the adult human brain following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:1647–1655. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Shi J, Longo FM, Massa SM. A small molecule p75(NTR) ligand protects neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. Stem Cells. 2013;31:2561–2574. doi: 10.1002/stem.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shors TJ, Miesegaes G, Beylin A, Zhao M, Rydel T, Gould E. Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature. 2001;410:372–376. doi: 10.1038/35066584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Shors TJ, Townsend DA, Zhao M, Kozorovitskiy Y, Gould E. Neurogenesis may relate to some but not all types of hippocampal-dependent learning. Hippocampus. 2002;12:578–584. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Snyder JS, Hong NS, McDonald RJ, Wojtowicz JM. A role for adult neurogenesis in spatial long-term memory. Neuroscience. 2005;130:843–852. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Spalding KL, Bergmann O, Alkass K, Bernard S, Salehpour M, Huttner HB, Bostrom E, Westerlund I, Vial C, Buchholz BA, Possnert G, Mash DC, Druid H, Frisen J. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell. 2013;153:1219–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Suarez-Pereira I, Canals S, Carrion AM. Adult newborn neurons are involved in learning acquisition and long-term memory formation: The distinct demands on temporal neurogenesis of different cognitive tasks. Hippocampus. 2014 doi: 10.1002/hipo.22349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Sultan S, Lefort JM, Sacquet J, Mandairon N, Didier A. Acquisition of an olfactory associative task triggers a regionalized down-regulation of adult born neuron cell death. Front Neurosci. 2011a;5:52. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Sultan S, Rey N, Sacquet J, Mandairon N, Didier A. Newborn neurons in the olfactory bulb selected for long-term survival through olfactory learning are prematurely suppressed when the olfactory memory is erased. J Neurosci. 2011b;31:14893–14898. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3677-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Sun D, Bullock MR, Altememi N, Zhou Z, Hagood S, Rolfe A, McGinn MJ, Hamm R, Colello RJ. The effect of epidermal growth factor in the injured brain after trauma in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:923–938. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sun D, Bullock MR, McGinn MJ, Zhou Z, Altememi N, Hagood S, Hamm R, Colello RJ. Basic fibroblast growth factor-enhanced neurogenesis contributes to cognitive recovery in rats following traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2009;216:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Sun D, Colello RJ, Daugherty WP, Kwon TH, McGinn MJ, Harvey HB, Bullock MR. Cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation in the dentate gyrus in juvenile and adult rats following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:95–105. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Sun D, Daniels TE, Rolfe A, Waters M, Hamm R. Inhibition of injury-induced cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus impairs spontaneous cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32:495–505. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sun D, McGinn MJ, Zhou Z, Harvey HB, Bullock MR, Colello RJ. Anatomical integration of newly generated dentate granule neurons following traumatic brain injury in adult rats and its association to cognitive recovery. Exp Neurol. 2007;204:264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Tanapat P, Hastings NB, Reeves AJ, Gould E. Estrogen stimulates a transient increase in the number of new neurons in the dentate gyrus of the adult female rat 58. J Neurosci. 1999;19:5792–5801. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05792.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Taylor SR, Smith C, Harris BT, Costine BA, Duhaime AC. Maturation-dependent response of neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12:545–554. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.PEDS13154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Thau-Zuchman O, Shohami E, Alexandrovich AG, Leker RR. Vascular endothelial growth factor increases neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:1008–1016. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Theus MH, Ricard J, Bethea JR, Liebl DJ. EphB3 limits the expansion of neural progenitor cells in the subventricular zone by regulating p53 during homeostasis and following traumatic brain injury. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1231–1242. doi: 10.1002/stem.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Umschweif G, Liraz-Zaltsman S, Shabashov D, Alexandrovich A, Trembovler V, Horowitz M, Shohami E. Angiotensin receptor type 2 activation induces neuroprotection and neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2014;11:665–678. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0286-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. van Praag H, Schinder AF, Christie BR, Toni N, Palmer TD, Gage FH. Functional neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Nature. 2002;415:1030–1034. doi: 10.1038/4151030a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. van PH, Christie BR, Sejnowski TJ, Gage FH. Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13427–13431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Villasana LE, Westbrook GL, Schnell E. Neurologic impairment following closed head injury predicts post-traumatic neurogenesis. Exp Neurol. 2014;261:156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Meng Y, Zhang Y, Qu C, Schallert T, Chopp M. Delayed administration of erythropoietin reducing hippocampal cell loss, enhancing angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and improving functional outcome following traumatic brain injury in rats: comparison of treatment with single and triple dose. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:598–608. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.JNS09844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Xuan W, Vatansever F, Huang L, Hamblin MR. Transcranial low-level laser therapy enhances learning, memory, and neuroprogenitor cells after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19:108003. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.10.108003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zheng W, Zhuge Q, Zhong M, Chen G, Shao B, Wang H, Mao X, Xie L, Jin K. Neurogenesis in adult human brain after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1872–1880. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES