Abstract
The first degenerate version of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind appeared in the paper by Korobov (Math Notes 2:77–19, 1996; Proceedings of the IV international conference modern problems of number theory and its applications, pp 40–49, 2001). In this paper, we study two degenerate versions of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind which will be called Korobov polynomials of third kind and of the fourth kind. Some properties, identities, recurrence relations and connections with other polynomials are investigated by using umbral calculus.
Keywords: Korobov polynomials of the third kind and of the fourth kind, umbral calculus
Background
The Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind are given by the generating function
| 1.1 |
When , are called Bernoulli numbers of the second kind. The degenerate version of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind are called Korobov polynomials of the first kind. We note here that the Carlitz degerate Bernoulli polynomials were rediscovered by Ustinov under the name of Korobov polynomial of the second kind (see Pylypiv and Maliarchuk 2014; Ustinov 2003).
The Daehee polynomials are defined by the generating function
| 1.2 |
For , are called Daehee numbers.
The Korobov polynomials of the first kind are given by the generating function
| 1.3 |
When , are called Korobov numbers of the first kind.
In the following, we will review very briefly some necessary things on umbral calculus. Our basic reference is Roman (1984). Also, one is asked to look at more recent papers on umbral calculus (Nisar et al. 2015; Srivastava et al. 2014).
Let be the complex number field and let be the set of all formal power series in the variable t over with
| 1.4 |
Let and let be the vector space of all linear functionals on . For , the action of the linear functional L on a polynomial is denoted by with
where c is a complex constant (see Kim 2014; Roman 1984).
For , we define a linear functional on by setting
| 1.5 |
Thus, by (1.5), we easily get
| 1.6 |
where is the Kronecker’s symbol.
Let . Then, by (1.6), we get . Additionallly, the mapping is a vector space isomorphism from onto . Henceforth, denotes both the algebra of formal power series in t and the vector space of all linear functionals on , and so an element of can be regarded as both a formal power series and a linear functional. We refer to as the umbral algebra. The umbral calculus is the study of umbral algebra (see Kim 2014; Roman 1984). From (1.6), we can easily derive . So . The order of a power series is the smallest nonnegative integer k for which the coefficient at does not vanish. For and , we have
| 1.7 |
Thus, by (1.7), we get
| 1.8 |
From (1.8), we note that
| 1.9 |
Let such that and . Then there exists a unique sequence of polynomials such that , for . The sequence is called the Sheffer sequence for the pair , which is denoted by . For we have
| 1.10 |
and
| 1.11 |
Here is the compositional inverse of (see Kim and Mansour 2014; Roman 1984).
The conjugation representation for is given by
| 1.12 |
Let us consider the following two Sheffer sequences:
| 1.13 |
Then, we have
| 1.14 |
where
| 1.15 |
The first degenerate version of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind appeared in the paper by Korobov (2001; 1996). In this paper, we study two degenerate versions of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind which will be called Korobov polynomials of the third kind and of the fourth kind. Some properties, identities and recurrence relations for them are investigated by using umbral calculus. In addition, some connections with other polynomials are studied for which one refers to the related papers (Dattoli et al. 2006, 2004).
Korobov polynomials of the third kind and of the fourth kind
Now, we introduce Korobov polynomials of the third kind and of the fourth kind , respectively, given by the generating functions
| 2.1 |
and
| 2.2 |
When , and are called Korobov numbers of the third kind and of the fourth kind, respectively.
As all , , tend to as , , . We observe first that and are Sheffer sequences for the respective pairs and . That is,
and
| 2.3 |
From (1.12) and (2.2), we have
| 2.4 |
We observe that
| 2.5 |
where is the Stirling number of the first kind defined by
Therefore, by (2.4) and (2.5), we have
Theorem 1
For, we have
From (1.12) and (2.3), we have
| 2.6 |
We observe that
| 2.7 |
Therefore, by (2.6) and (2.7), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2
For, we have
By (1.6) and (2.1), we easily get
| 2.8 |
Thus, by (2.8), we get
| 2.9 |
From (1.6) and (2.2), we note that
| 2.10 |
Thus, by (2.10), we get
| 2.11 |
From (2.2), we note that
| 2.12 |
By (2.12), we get
| 2.13 |
We observe that
| 2.14 |
Thus, by (2.13) and (2.14), we have
| 2.15 |
where is the Stirling number of the second kind given by
Therefore, by (2.15), we obtain the following theorem expressing in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind and of the second and Daehee numbers.
Theorem 3
For, we have
From (2.3), we have
| 2.16 |
Thus, by (2.16), we get
| 2.17 |
Now, we observe that
| 2.18 |
where is the n-th Bernoulli number given by the generating function
Thus, by (2.17) and (2.18), we get
| 2.19 |
Therefore, by (2.19), we obtain the following theorem expressing in terms of the Stirling numbers of the first kind and of the second kind, Daehee numbers and Bernoulli numbers.
Theorem 4
For , we have
From (2.8), we have
| 2.20 |
Thus, by (2.20), we get
| 2.21 |
From (2.10), we have
| 2.22 |
By (2.22), we get
| 2.23 |
From (2.19), we have
| 2.24 |
Thus, by (2.24), we get
| 2.25 |
From (2.10), we can also derive the following equation:
| 2.26 |
Thus, by (2.26), we get
| 2.27 |
Therefore, by (2.21), (2.23), (2.25) and (2.27), we obtain the following theorem expressing and both in terms of falling factorial polynomials. Also, we express and respectively by Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind and Korobov polynomials of the first kind.
Theorem 5
For, we have
and
It is easy to see that
| 2.28 |
For , we have
| 2.29 |
Thus, by (2.29), we get
| 2.30 |
From (2.3), we note that
| 2.31 |
For , by (2.31), we get
| 2.32 |
Thus, by (2.32), we have
| 2.33 |
Therefore, by (2.30) and (2.33), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 6
For, we have
and
For we note that Sheffer identity is given by
| 2.34 |
| 2.35 |
where .
From (2.3) and (2.34), we have
| 2.36 |
where .
By (1.10), we see that
| 2.37 |
and
| 2.38 |
From (2.37) and (2.38), we have
| 2.39 |
| 2.40 |
Thus, by (2.40), we have
| 2.41 |
Therefore, by (2.35), (2.36), (2.39) and (2.41), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 7
For, we have
and
For , we note that
| 2.42 |
For , by (2.42), we get
| 2.43 |
Thus, by (2.42) and (2.43), we have
| 2.44 |
By the same method as (2.44), we get
| 2.45 |
Therefore, by (2.44) and (2.45), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 8
For, we have
and
Let . Then, by (1.6), (2.1) and (2.3), we get
| 2.46 |
We observe that
| 2.47 |
and
| 2.48 |
By (2.48), we get
| 2.49 |
For , from (2.46), (2.47) and (2.49), we have
| 2.50 |
Therefore, by (2.50), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 9
For, we have
Remark
We note that
| 2.51 |
where .
We note that
| 2.52 |
Now, we observe that
| 2.53 |
Thus, by (2.53), we get
| 2.54 |
From (2.51), (2.52) and (2.54), we have
| 2.55 |
Therefore, by (2.55), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 10
For, we have
Let us consider the following two Sheffer sequences:
| 2.56 |
From (1.14) and (1.15), we have
| 2.57 |
where
| 2.58 |
Therefore, by (2.57) and (2.58), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 11
For , we have
For , we have
| 2.59 |
where
| 2.60 |
Therefore, by (2.59) and (2.60), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 12
For, we have
Let us consider the following two Sheffer sequences:
Note that
where are called the higher-order Bernoulli polynomials.
From (1.14) and (1.15), we have
| 2.61 |
where
| 2.62 |
Here, the Bernoulli numbers of the second kind of order s are defined by the generating function
Therefore, by (2.61) and (2.62), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 13
For, we have
Remark
In a similar manner, one shows that, for ,
For with , , the Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order s are defined by the generating function
For , , we have
| 2.63 |
where
| 2.64 |
Therefore, by (2.63) and (2.64), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 14
For, we have
Remark
Proceeding similarly to the above, one can show that, for ,
Conclusion
The first degenerate version of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind appeared in the paper by Korobov (1996, 2001). Here, we study two degenerate versions of the Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind which will be called Korobov polynomials of third kind and of the fourth kind. Some properties, identities, recurrence relations and connections with other polynomials are investigated by using umbral calculus.
Authors' contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The work reported in this paper was conducted during the sabbatical year of Kwangwoon University in 2014.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Taekyun Kim, Email: tkkim@kw.ac.kr.
Dae San Kim, Email: dskim@sogang.ac.kr.
References
- Araci S, Acikogz M. A note on the Frobenius-Euler numbers and polynomials associated with Bernstein polynomials. Adv Stud Contemp Math. 2012;22(3):399–406. [Google Scholar]
- Bayad A, Kim T. Identities for the Bernoulli, the Euler and the Genocchi numbers and polynomials. Adv Stud Contemp Math. 2010;20(2):247–253. [Google Scholar]
- Carlitz L. Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and EEuler numbers. Utilitas Math. 1979;15:51–88. [Google Scholar]
- Dattoli G, Lorenzutta S, Cesarano C. Bernstein polynomials and operational methods. J Comput Anal Appl. 2006;8(4):369–377. [Google Scholar]
- Dattoli G, Lorenzutta S, Ricci PE, Cesarano C. On a family of hybrid polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2004;15(6):485–490. doi: 10.1080/10652460412331270634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim DS, Kim T, Lee S-H. Higher-order Daehee of the first kind and poly-Cauchy of the first kind mixed type polynomials. J Comput Anal Appl. 2015;18(4):699–714. [Google Scholar]
- Kim DS, Kim T, Rim S-H, Dolgy DV. Barnes’ multiple Bernoulli and Hermite mixed-type polynomials. Proc Jangjeon Math Soc. 2015;18(1):7–19. [Google Scholar]
- Kim T. Identities involving laguerre polynomials derived from umbral calculus. Russ J Math Phys. 2014;21(1):36–45. doi: 10.1134/S1061920814010038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim T, Kim DS, Bayad A, Rim S-H. Identities on the Bernoulli and the Euler numbers and polynomials. Ars Combin. 2012;107:455–463. [Google Scholar]
- Kim T, Mansour T. Umbral calculus associated with Frobenius-type Euler polynomials. Russ J math Phys. 2014;21(4):484–493. doi: 10.1134/S1061920814040062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Korobov NM. Special polynomials and their applications, diophantine approximations. Math Notes. 1996;2:77–89. [Google Scholar]
- Korobov NM (2001) On some properties of special polynomials. In: Proceedings of the IV International Conference Modern Problems of Number Theory and its Applications (Russian) (Tula, 2001), vol. 1, pp. 40–49
- Nisar KS, Mondal SR, Agarwal P, Al-Dhaifallah M. The umbral operator and the integration involving generalized Bessel-type functions. Open Math. 2015;13(1):426–435. doi: 10.1515/math-2015-0041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pylypiv VM, Maliarchuk AR. On some properties of Korobov polynomials. Carpathian Math Publ. 2014;6(1):130–133. doi: 10.15330/cmp.6.1.130-133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roman S. The umbral calculus, Pure and Applied Mathematics. New York: Academic Press Inc [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers]; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Şen E. Theorems on Apostol-Euler polynomials of higher order arising from Euler basis. Adv Stud Contemp Math (Kyungshang) 2013;23(2):337–345. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava HM, Nisar KS, Khan MA. Some umbral calculus presentations of the Chan-Chyan-Srivastava polynomials and the Erku-Srivastava polynomials. Proyecciones. 2014;33(1):77–90. doi: 10.4067/S0716-09172014000100006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ustinov AV. A discrete analogue of Euler’s summation formula. Mat Zametki. 2002;71(6):931–936. doi: 10.4213/mzm397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ustinov AV. Korobov polynomials and umbral analysis. Chebyshevskiĭ Sb. 2003;4(8):137–152. [Google Scholar]
