Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2015 Oct 8;112(43):13330–13335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510045112

IL-7R signaling in regulatory T cells maintains peripheral and allograft tolerance in mice

Mathias Schmaler a,1,2, Maria A S Broggi a,1, Nadège Lagarde a, Benjamin F Stöcklin a, Carolyn G King b, Daniela Finke c, Simona W Rossi a,2
PMCID: PMC4629352  PMID: 26450881

Significance

In mammals, regulatory T cells establish and maintain immune responses toward self- and non–self-antigens by suppression of specific T cells. Several mechanisms of suppression were previously described including starvation for IL-2, a cytokine required for T-cell expansion. Here we show that regulatory T cells (Treg) respond to IL-7, a T-cell survival factor produced by lymph node fibroblast reticular cells, by enhancing their IL-2 sensitivity, thereby limiting expansion of reactive T cells during inflammation. These findings highlight a previously unidentified and unexpected mechanism by which IL-7R signaling in Treg cells maintains peripheral and allograft tolerance. This work may contribute to design new therapeutic approaches using lower IL-2 doses in humans by enhancing the functional competence of regulatory T cells with IL-7.

Keywords: regulatory T cell, IL-7R, IL-7, IL-2, skin transplantation

Abstract

Foxp3+CD4+ regulatory T cells (Treg) have a crucial role in controlling CD4+ T-cell activation, proliferation, and effector function. However, the molecular mechanisms regulating Treg function remain poorly understood. Here we assessed the role of IL-7, a key cytokine regulating T-cell homeostasis, in suppressor capacity of Treg. Using a skin allograft model in which transplant acceptance is controlled by the number of transferred Treg, we find that Treg impair the proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells, decrease production of IFNγ by effector T cells, and prevent early and increase late IL-7 induction by lymph node stromal cells. Increased IL-7 availability enhanced Treg survival, stabilized Treg molecular signature, enhanced surface IL-2Rα expression, and improved IL-2 binding of Treg, which diminished proliferation of alloreactive CD4+ T cells. Sequestration of IL-7 or impairment of IL-7R signaling after allograft transplantation abolished Treg-mediated tolerance by limiting their suppressive capacity. Aged Il7rα-ΔTreg mice displayed mild symptoms of autoimmunity correlating with impaired expansion of effector Treg in response to IL-2. Thus, IL-7R signaling on Treg supports the functional activity of effector Treg by increasing their IL-2 sensitivity in the lymph node during peripheral and allograft tolerance.


Regulatory T cells (Treg) express the transcription factor Foxp3 and maintain peripheral tolerance through the suppression of potentially self-reactive T cells (1, 2). Treg deficiency and mutations in FoxP3 result in the development of autoimmune diseases in both humans and mice. The molecular mechanisms underlying the function and stability of the Treg compartment have not been fully elucidated (25). Treg constitutively express IL-2Rα (6), in which IL-2 has been shown to regulate Treg survival, expansion, and suppressive function under both homeostatic and activation conditions (7, 8). Treg impaired in IL-2Rα signaling fail to suppress effector T-cell responses (7). Because Treg themselves are unable to produce their own IL-2, due to FoxP3-dependent repression of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) gene (9), Treg are susceptible to IL-2 concentrations and need to compete for it in secondary lymphoid organs (SLO) (10). Therefore, competition for IL-2 with conventional T cells is one of the proposed suppressive mechanism of Treg (6).

Recently, it was shown that central Treg (cTreg), defined by CD44low and CD62Lhigh expression, completely depend on IL-2 during homeostatic and inflammatory conditions, whereas effector Treg (eTreg), defined by CD44high and CD62Llow expression, require inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS) signaling (11). Because Treg not only use IL-2 for expansion and proliferation, but also for survival and pool maintenance, it is unclear if IL-2 competition occurs at low IL-2 concentration (as suggested in ref. 12). Moreover, IL-2 signaling via STAT5 (13) stabilizes FOXP3 expression and increases expression of suppressive Treg molecules including ICOS, glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related protein (GITR), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) (1416).

IL-7, a member of the γc-cytokine family, is constitutively produced by stromal cells in SLO and can be further induced in response to various inflammatory mediators (17, 18). Production of IL-7 by lymph node (LN) stromal cells (LNSC) is important for naïve T-cell survival and activation during adaptive immune responses (19, 20). Interaction between IL-7 and the IL-7Rα/γc chain activates STAT5 phosphorylation and induces the expression of antiapoptotic molecules, such as Bcl-2, which play a key role in T-cell development and proliferation (reviewed in ref. 21). Alternatively, continuous IL-7 signaling in naïve T cells can lead to activation and cell death when T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling is insufficient (22). The role of IL-7 in controlling Foxp3+ Treg is less clear. The injection of soluble IL-7 complexes has been shown to increase the number of Treg (23, 24) and optimizes their reactivity to IL-2 (25). IL-7Rα−/− mice have a reduced Treg population (26), and IL-7R–deficient Treg demonstrate impaired proliferation (27). Although these studies imply an important role for IL-7 in the maintenance and activation of Treg, the role of IL-7 during inflammatory T-cell responses in the periphery is still poorly understood.

To study the role of IL-7 and IL-7R signaling in Treg homeostasis and function, we generated a skin allograft tolerance model in which specific graft rejection is prevented by cotransfer of Treg. Our data indicate that Treg inhibited strong allogeneic CD4+ T-cell responses, thereby ensuring their maintenance within the LN. Treg responded to IL-7 by enhancing CD25 expression and their sensitivity to IL-2, thereby limiting IL-2 availability for effector T-cell proliferation required for graft rejection. Moreover, IL-7R deficiency had only mild effects on the survival and homeostasis of Treg under steady-state conditions. A subset of Treg was dependent on IL-7R signaling in the LN and increased in response to IL-2. IL-7R signaling in Treg was required to prevent autoimmunity and allograft tolerance in mice. Our findings indicate that IL-7R–sufficient Treg require stromal cell-derived IL-7 in the LN to maintain their phenotype and function.

Results

Treg Suppress Rejection of I-Abm12 Skin Allografts.

To assess whether Treg can suppress allogeneic CD4+ T-cell responses in vivo, we used a newly established murine transplantation model. I-Abm12 mismatch skin grafts from Rag2−/− mice are accepted by Rag2−/− mice, whereas transfer of I-Abm12–specific transgenic CD4+ T cells (ABM) leads to rejection (28). We first confirmed our previous finding that 2 × 104 ABM reject I-Abm12 skin grafts from transplanted Rag2−/− mice within 12–14 days (Fig. 1A) (28). Furthermore, coinjection of twice the number of polyclonal GFP-expressing Treg only delayed graft rejection (2:1 group), whereas 10 times more Treg induced stable graft tolerance up to 100 days (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Treg establish and maintain skin allograft tolerance. I-Abm12 tail skin transplanted Rag2−/− mice adoptively transferred with monoclonal transgenic anti–I-Abm12 CD4+ T cells (ABM) alone or at different ratios of polyclonal Foxp3+ Treg:ABM. (A) Percentage of graft survival of transplanted mice after adoptive T-cell transfer [n = 4–6, log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test: P < 0.0001]. (B) Counts of recovered ABM (Left) and Foxp3+ Treg (Right) in the different groups (n = 10, SEM, t test). (C) Ratio of recovered ABM and Foxp3+ Treg (n = 10, SEM, t test) on day 9 after adoptive T-cell transfer in the LN. (D) Frequency of IFNγ+ ABM isolated from transplanted mice on day 9 after adoptive T-cell transfer and restimulated with PMA-Ionomycin (n = 4, SEM, t test).

To assess whether Treg are required to alter initial establishment of tolerance, we used Treg from Foxp3-DTR mice to allow their depletion following diphtheria toxin (DT) treatment. Indeed, we found that the absence of Treg resulted in rejection of I-Abm12 allografts, indicating a Treg-dependent tolerance (Fig. S1A). We further characterized the migration kinetics of transferred ABM and Treg in LN and skin grafts. Both ABM and Treg were detected in the draining lymph nodes (dLN) on day 3, and their numbers progressively increased over time. On day 9, the number of ABM recovered from the dLN was lower with higher numbers of transferred Treg (Fig. 1B, Left), whereas the number of Treg was comparable (Fig. 1B, Right). Interestingly, a ratio of Treg to ABM higher than 1 in the dLN correlated with long-term tolerance of skin allografts (Fig. 1C). In contrast, in the skin grafts, higher numbers of ABM compared with Treg were found in the 2:1 and the 10:1 group after T-cell transfer on day 9 (Fig. S1B).

Fig. S1.

Fig. S1.

Treg cells do not inhibit ABM cell migration to the graft and activation in the LN. I-Abm12 tail skin transplanted Rag2−/− mice adoptively transferred with monoclonal transgenic anti I-Abm12 CD4+ T cells (ABM) alone or at different ratios of polyclonal Foxp3+ Treg:ABM. (A) Percentage of graft survival of transplanted mice treated (i.p.) with 0.4 mg/mouse diphtheria toxin or PBS on days 2 and 4 after adoptive T-cell transfer [n = 6, log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test: P < 0.0001]. (B) Counts of recovered ABM and Treg cells from skin allograft of transplanted mice on day 9 after adoptive transfer. (C) Surface expression of CD25, CD44, CD62L, and CD69 and (D) proliferation of ABM, determined by eFluor670 proliferation dye staining, on day 9 after adoptive T-cell transfer in the LN (n = 4–6, SEM, t test). The filled gray curve represents the fluorescence of undivided cells at the day of adoptive transfer (day 0). (E) Counts of IFNγ+ ABM isolated from transplanted mice on day 9 after adoptive T-cell transfer and restimulated with PMA-Ionomycin (n = 4, SEM, t test). Data pooled from two independent experiments, and each symbol represents an individual mouse (B, C, and E; t test).

It is known that I-Abm12 skin graft rejection depends on activation and IFNγ production of allogeneic CD4+ T cells (28, 29). To assess whether Treg are able to suppress allogeneic T-cell responses, we analyzed activation, proliferation, and IFNγ production of ABM in the presence of Treg in I-Abm12–transplanted Rag2−/− mice on day 9. Surface expression of CD25, CD44, and CD62L on ABM was not influenced by the number of transferred Treg, whereas CD69 did (Fig. S1C). Proliferation of ABM was impaired depending on the number of cotransferred Treg (Fig. S1D). Moreover, IFNγ-producing ABM were lower in frequency and number in the 10:1 group than in the ABM group (Fig. 1D and Fig. S1E). Taken together, Treg establish allograft tolerance after transplantation by suppressing proliferation and IFNγ production of allogenic CD4+ T cells.

Treg Affect the IL-7 Production of LN-FRC.

Activation of ovalbumin (OVA)-specific CD8+ T cells has been shown to modulate the transcription of several molecules in LN fibroblastic reticular cells (LN-FRC) (18). We first assessed the effect of allogeneic T-cell activation in the transcription profile of LN-FRC after transplantation of I-Abm12 allo- and I-Ab syngrafts on C57BL/6 and IFNγ−/− mice. ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IL-7 were increased after allotransplantation of naïve C57BL/6 mice, whereas transcription of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL-7, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) were increased in LN-FRC from allografted compared with syngrafted C57BL/6 mice (Fig. S2A) but not in IFNγ−/− mice (Fig. S2B). Moreover, IL-7 protein was increased in LN lysates from allograft compared with syngraft transplanted and naïve C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 2A). IL-7 transcripts in LN-FRC were higher after treatment of C57BL/6 mice with IFNγ compared with saline (Fig. 2B). These results showed that allogeneic CD4+ T-cell activation and release of IFNγ induce IL-7 expression in LNSC. Indeed, ABM transfer induced early IL-7 production in LN-FRC on day 3 (Fig. 2C). Subsequently, we examined the ability of Treg to modulate the kinetics of LN-FRC–derived IL-7 using our transplantation model. Treg in the tolerant 10:1 group prevented early up-regulation of IL-7 transcripts on day 3 (Fig. 2C). Unexpectedly, the IL-7 transcripts were higher in the tolerant 10:1 group than in the ABM group on day 9 (Fig. 2 C and D). These results suggest that the presence of Treg affects IL-7 expression in stromal cells after transplantation.

Fig. S2.

Fig. S2.

LN-FRC respond to IFNγ in allografts. (A) C57BL/6 mice and (B) IFNγ−/− mice were allograft transplanted (black bars) or syngraft transplanted (gray bars) and naive (white bars) mice, and RT-PCR was performed for relative mRNA expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, I-Ab, IL-7, TSLP, and PD-L1 in LN-FRC isolated on day 9 after transplantation. Data pooled from two independent experiments with n = 6 mice (SEM, Mann–Whitney test).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Treg affect IL-7 production in the LN. (A) IL-7 protein levels in dLN lysates of I-Abm12 (allograft, n = 5) and I-Ab (syngraft, n = 3) skin transplanted and nontransplanted (dotted line, n = 4) C57BL/6 mice at day 7, measured by ELISA (SEM, t test). (B) Relative expression of IL-7 mRNA in LN-FRC isolated from saline-treated mice (n = 9) and IFNγ-treated C57BL/6 mice (10,000 U/mouse, n = 5) 12 h after treatment (SEM, t test). (C) Relative expression of IL-7 mRNA in LN-FRC isolated from naïve mice (dotted line, n = 4) and on days 3, 6, and 9 after adoptive transfer of mice injected with ABM alone (n = 4) or coinjected with 10 times more Foxp3+ Treg (10:1, n = 4) and (D) their relative expression of IL-7 mRNA on day 9 (n = 6 ABM, n = 4 10:1, SEM, t test).

IL-7 Signaling Stabilizes the Suppressive Treg Phenotype.

IL-7 stabilizes Treg numbers in mice (30, 31) and increases T-cell survival by reducing apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner in vitro (Fig. S3A). We next studied the molecular basis of IL-7R signaling on naïve and CD3/28 activated Treg at varying IL-7 concentrations. IL-7R down-regulation was observed at increasing IL-7 concentrations with or without TCR stimulation (EC50 values) (Fig. S3B). In addition, surface expression of activation markers, including CD25 and GITR, increased dependent of IL-7 concentrations with or without TCR signaling (EC50 values) (Fig. S3 C and D). Our data indicate that increasing IL-7 levels influence the phenotype of Treg in vitro. To confirm these results in vivo, we increased IL-7 availability in mice by injecting IL-7 complex (IL-7C). Only a high dose of IL-7C significantly increased Treg number, induced IL-7R down-regulation, and increased surface CD25 expression (Fig. 3A), indicating that high IL-7 levels induced IL-7R signaling and activation of Treg in vivo.

Fig. S3.

Fig. S3.

IL-7 signaling stabilizes the suppressive Treg phenotype. (A) Frequency of apoptotic (●, n = 6, SEM) and counts of surviving Foxp3+ Treg (○, n = 3, SEM) stimulated with varying IL-7 concentrations for 24 h in vitro. Surface expression of (B) IL-7R, (C) CD25, and (D) GITR on Foxp3+ Treg from Foxp3-eGFP mice stimulated with varying IL-7 concentrations (A) for 24 h in vitro with or without CD3/CD28 beads. EC50 of each group is reported (n = 3, SEM). Data are representative of two and three experiments (A–D).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

IL-7 signaling stabilizes the suppressive Treg phenotype. (A) Cell counts, IL-7R, and CD25 expression of Foxp3+ Treg isolated from a pool of brachial, axillary, and inguinal LN of Foxp3-eGFP mice 24 h after a single injection of IL-7 complex (IL-7C) (n = 3–4, SEM, t test). Data are representative of three experiments. (B) Percentage of graft survival for I-Abm12 tail skin transplanted Rag2−/− mice adoptively transferred with ABM alone or at different Foxp3+ Treg:ABM ratios, nontreated and treated (i.p.) at alternate days with 12.5 mg/mouse anti–IL-7 (M25) and IgG2b antibody starting at day 6 after adoptive transfer [n = 5–6, log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test: P < 0.0017]. (C) Ratio of Foxp3+ Treg:ABM in M25-treated mice on day 9 after adoptive T-cell transfer (n = 6, SEM). Each symbol represents an individual mouse from at least two experiments.

We next examined the effect of IL-7 signaling on the immunosuppressive function of Treg in allograft transplantation. The administration of the anti–IL-7 blocking antibody M25 in the 10:1 group reduced IL-7 availability, which resulted in allograft rejection in 40% of the transplanted mice (Fig. 3B). The ratio of Treg to ABM was higher than 1 in five of six mice in the dLN (Fig. 3C), thereby excluding graft rejection as a result of reduced Treg survival. These results suggested that the suppressive capacity of Treg depends on IL-7 availability in the dLN.

IL-7 Sensitizes Treg for IL-2 to Suppress Teff Proliferation.

Our data thus far suggested that Treg respond to IL-7 signaling by increasing their suppressive phenotype and the expression of surface markers. Treg from IL-7C–treated mice were increased in expression of CD25 (Figs. 3A and 4A) and of CD122, GITR, and ICOS but not CD132 and KI67 (Fig. 4A and Fig. S4A). It is well known that Treg require IL-2 for their suppressive function (32). To assess the IL-2 sensitivity of IL-7–exposed Treg in vivo, LN and spleens were analyzed from IL-2C–injected mice pretreated with IL-7C or saline. Treg from IL-7C–pretreated mice up-regulated the expression of CD132, GITR, ICOS, and Ki67, but not CD25 and CD122 and phosphorylation of STAT5 in response to the IL-2C compared with saline-pretreated mice (Fig. 4A and Fig. S4 A and B). To exclude possible contributions of other cells responding to IL-7 and IL-2, we stimulated IL-7– or saline-pretreated Treg with IL-2 in the presence or absence of TCR stimulation in vitro (Fig. S4C). IL-7–pretreated Treg responded to IL-2 by higher CD25 expression, which was further up-regulated by increasing concentrations of IL-2 (Fig. S4C). Although CD25 expression was even higher in TCR stimulated Treg, IL-7 responses were comparable to those without TCR stimulation, as indicated by similar EC50 values (Fig. S4C). Interestingly, IL-7–pretreated Treg had more pSTAT5 (Fig. S4D) and had increased binding of IL-2 with or without TCR stimulation (Fig. 4B). These data strongly suggest that IL-7R signaling has an impact in IL-2 sensitivity of Treg in vitro. The TCR-stimulated proliferation of CD3/CD28-activated ABM was reduced by 2 (2:1 group), whereas the addition of 10 times (10:1 group) more Treg and exogenous IL-7 further increased Treg-mediated suppression of ABM in the 2:1 group, but not in the presence of a high number of Treg in the 10:1 group (Fig. 4C). Moreover, IL-7–pretreated Treg were able to suppress proliferation of I-Abm12–activated ABM more efficiently than nonpretreated Treg (Fig. 4D). These data indicate that IL-7 increases IL-2 sensitivity of Treg, thereby increasing their competence to suppress allogeneic T-cell proliferation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Treg exposed to IL-7 enhance their capacity to bind IL-2 and suppress CD4+ T-cell proliferation. (A) IL-2C– and saline-induced expression of CD25, GITR, ICOS, and KI67 on Treg isolated from spleens of Foxp3-eGFP mice 24 h after treatment with IL-7C or saline for 24 h in vivo (n = 2–5, SEM, t test). (B) IL-2 binding by medium and IL-7–stimulated Foxp3+ Treg in the absence or presence of CD3/CD28 bead stimulation. (C) ABM proliferation stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads for 5 d determined by eFluor670 proliferation dye staining in presence of Foxp3+ Treg in a 2:1 or 10:1 (Foxp3+ Treg: ABM) ratio with or without 50 ng/mL IL-7 for 5 d (n = 4, SEM, t test). (D) Percent of proliferating ABM in the presence of two times more Foxp3+ Treg cocultured with irradiated I-Abm12 splenocytes in the presence or absence of 10 ng/mL mrIL-7 for 3 d (n = 9, SEM, t test). Data are representative of two and three experiments (A–D), and each symbol represents an individual mouse from at least two experiments (A).

Fig. S4.

Fig. S4.

Treg exposed to IL-7 enhance CD25 expression and signaling. (A) IL-2C– and saline-induced expression of CD122, CD132, and (B) pSTAT5 on Treg isolated from spleens of Foxp3-eGFP mice 24 h after treatment with IL-7C or saline for 24 h in vivo (n = 2–5, SEM, t test). (C) CD25 expression on Foxp3+ Treg from Foxp3-eGFP mice pretreated with 10 ng/mL IL-7 (squares) or medium (circles) in the absence (filled) or presence (empty) of CD3/CD28 beads after incubation with increasing IL-2 concentrations for 24 h in vitro. EC50 values are shown (n = 3, SEM). (D) STAT5 phosphorylation of medium and IL-7–preincubated Foxp3+ Treg in response to increasing IL-2 concentrations (see C). EC50 values are shown (n = 3, SEM). Data are representative of two and three experiments (A–D), and each symbol represents an individual mouse from at least two experiments.

IL-7R Signaling Is Required for Treg Function.

To study the function of IL-7R signaling in Treg, we generated Treg-conditional IL-7R KO by crossing Il-7a–floxed mice with Foxp3-YFP-Cre mice. Treg from Il7ra-∆Treg mice did not express IL-7R and did not phosphorylate STAT5 in response to IL-7 (Fig. S5 A and B). Conventional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Tcon cells) were present in LN of Il7ra-∆Treg mice and did not differ in frequency or number compared with Foxp3-YFP-Cre mice (Fig. S5C). Moreover, Treg number and frequency were similar in skin dLN of Il7ra-∆Treg mice compared with their control littermate (Fig. S5C). To further investigate survival in competition, we cotransferred Il7ra-∆Treg and Foxp3-YFP-Cre Treg at a ratio of 1:1 and 3:1 in Rag2−/− mice (Fig. 5A). Four weeks after Treg transfer, the number of Il7ra-∆Treg was 2.5-fold (1:1) and 5-fold (3:1) lower compared with Foxp3-YFP-Cre Treg, and the initial ratio of 1:1 and 3:1 was not maintained in LN (Fig. 5A). Collectively, these data suggest that homeostasis and in vivo function of Treg partially depend on IL-7R signaling.

Fig. S5.

Fig. S5.

Characterization of Il7ra-ΔTreg mice. (A) IL-7R was deleted in Foxp3+ Treg by crossing Foxp3-YFP-Cre mice with Il7raflox/flox mice; representative genotyping for Il7rafl/fl, Il7raΔ/Δ, and Il7ra+/+ WT band in YFP+ and YFP CD4+ T cells. (B) Representative flow cytometry of phosphorylated STAT5 in Foxp3+ Treg sorted from LN of Foxp3-YFP-Cre and Il7ra-ΔTreg mice after stimulation with 10 ng/mL rmIL-7 for 5 min. (C) Summary of the frequency and counts of T cells in skin draining LN of Foxp3-YFP-Cre (filled) and Il7ra-ΔTreg mice (open) (n = 8, SEM, t test). Each symbol represents an individual mouse from at least two experiments.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

IL-7R increases suppressive capacity of Treg cells. (A) Ratio of recovered Foxp3+ Treg from LN of Il7ra-ΔTreg and Foxp3-YFP-Cre mice after adoptive transfer in Rag2−/− mice on day 30 in different ratios (n = 6, SEM, t test). (B) I-Abm12 tail skin transplanted Rag2−/− mice adoptively transferred with monoclonal transgenic anti–I-Abm12 CD4+ T cells (ABM, n = 4) alone and different ratios of polyclonal Foxp3+ cells:ABM. Percentage of graft survival for transplanted mice after adoptive transfer of ABM and Foxp3+ Treg from Foxp3-Cre and IL7ra-ΔTreg mice [n = 6, log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test: P < 0.0001]. (C) In vitro suppression of ABM cells stimulated with I-Abm12 splenocytes in the presence of Treg from FoxP3-YFP-Cre and Il7ra-ΔTreg mice (2:1 Treg:ABM) and exogenous IL-7 (n = 7, SEM, t test). Data are representative of three experiments.

To assess the importance of IL-7R signaling in the function of Treg, we purified Treg from LN of Foxp3-YFP-Cre and Il7ra-∆Treg mice and cotransferred them in I-Abm12–transplanted mice. IL-7R–deficient Treg in a 10:1 ratio were less efficient to suppress I-Abm12 skin graft rejection in allografted Rag2−/− mice (Fig. 5B). In addition, IL-7R–deficient Treg were less efficient than Foxp3-eGFP Treg to suppress proliferation of naïve I-Abm12–activated ABM in vitro (Fig. 5C), indicating that IL-7R signaling is important for the suppressive capacity of Treg in vitro and to maintain allograft tolerance in LN of transplanted mice.

eTreg Require IL-7R Expression to Maintains Their Function.

Treg are a heterogeneous population that shows a high degree of phenotypic and functional specialization defined as cTreg (CD44loCD62Lhi) and eTreg (CD44hiCD62Llo). To understand whether IL-7R signaling facilitates differentiation of eTreg in mice, we analyzed Treg subsets both before and after adoptive T-cell transfer in I-Abm12 transplanted mice. The frequency of cTreg and eTreg before transfer were comparable (Fig. S6A, Left); frequency of eTreg was higher in the dLN of the 10:1 group (Fig. S6A) and increasingly expanded as assessed by eFluor670 dilution on day 9 (Fig. S6B). We confirmed that eTreg have lower CD25 expression than cTreg (Fig. 6A, Left) (11) and found higher IL-7R expression in eTreg in Foxp3-eGFP mice (Fig. 6A, Right). Collectively, these data suggest that effector Treg accumulate during allo-transplantation.

Fig. S6.

Fig. S6.

IL-7R+ Treg maintain immunological tolerance in mice. (A) Representative distribution of cTreg and eTreg among LN Foxp3+ Treg before (Left) and on day 9 after adoptive transfer of Foxp3+ Treg:ABM (10:1) in I-Abm12–transplanted mice (Right). (B) Proliferation of cTreg (gray line) and eTreg (black line) on day 9 after adoptive transfer of Foxp3+ Treg:ABM (10:1) in I-Abm12–transplanted Rag2−/− mice. eFlour670 staining of Treg before adoptive transfer (light gray line, filled). (C) H&E staining of lung tissue from 19- to 21-wk-old Il7ra-ΔTreg mice. Data are representative of at least two experiments.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

IL-7R signaling maintains suppressive function of eTreg. (A) Flow cytometry of cTreg (CD44loCD62Lhi) and eTreg (CD44hiCD62Llo) among CD4+Foxp3+ Treg from spleens of Foxp3-eGFP mice assessing the expression of CD25 (Left) and IL-7R (Right) (n = 5, SEM, Mann–Whitney). (B) Expression of CD25 on eTreg isolated from spleens of Foxp3-eGFP mice after 24 h of IL-7 complex (IL-7 C) injection (n = 3–4, SEM, t test). (C) Summary of frequency of cTreg and eTreg from Foxp3-Cre and Il7ra-ΔTreg mice treated with saline and IL-2 complex (IL-2C) for 24 h (n = 6–7, SEM, Mann–Whitney). (D) Frequency of eTreg from LN of 19–21 wk old Il7ra-ΔTreg mice (n = 5, SEM, Mann–Whitney). (E) H&E staining of liver tissue from 19- to 21-wk-old Il7ra-ΔTreg mice. Data are representative of at least two experiments.

To examine whether eTreg respond to increased IL-7 levels, we injected IL-7C in Foxp3-eGFP mice and analyzed expression of CD25. Indeed, IL-7C treatment increased CD25 expression in eTreg (Fig. 6B). We next assessed eTreg expansion in response to IL-2 by injection of IL-2C and BrdU in Foxp3-YFP-Cre and Il7ra-∆Treg mice. Interestingly the frequency of eTreg was specifically increased in Foxp3-YFP-Cre but not in Il7ra-∆Treg mice (Fig. 6C). These data indicate that increased IL-7 levels enhance IL-2 sensitivity and thereby the specific proliferation and maintenance of highly suppressive eTreg subsets.

Finally, we analyzed whether the IL-7R–specific signaling in Treg has an impact on the eTreg subset under homeostatic conditions in aged mice. In aged mice, the frequency of eTreg was higher in Foxp3-YFP-Cre than Il7ra-∆Treg mice (Fig. 6D). The lower number of eTreg was accompanied by mild symptoms of autoimmunity by induction of follicles in the liver and lung of Il7ra-∆Treg, but not Foxp3-YFP-Cre mice (Fig. 6E and Fig. S6C). These data indicate that IL-7R signaling in Treg is required to maintain immunological tolerance during aging in mice.

Taken together, we show that IL-7 levels increase the suppressive capacity of Treg, both during transplantation and aging, via up-regulation of CD25. As a result, Treg IL-2 sensitivity is increased for successful IL-2 competition with CD25hi T cells, thereby maintaining T-cell tolerance.

Discussion

The population of Foxp3+ T cells consists of functionally different Treg subsets that regulate different immune responses (2). Although many studies investigated the function of Treg, the mechanisms controlling homeostasis and activation of different Treg subsets are poorly defined. Using the newly established allograft tolerance model, we identified that IL-7 signaling, beside its known role in survival, stabilizes the function of Treg in the LN during inflammatory T-cell responses. Treg prevented early and increased late IL-7 induction in LN-FRC. Our data suggest that Treg require IL-7R signaling to increase their CD25 expression and efficiently compete with other T-cell subsets for IL-2. Improved IL-2 sensitivity stabilized the Treg phenotype and promoted expansion of eTreg in vivo. The specific ablation of IL-7R specifically on Treg reduced their suppressive function, causing allograft rejection and mild symptoms of autoimmunity during aging.

In various allograft models including skin allograft transplantation, Treg were shown to control immune responses to foreign antigens (33). We established a transplantation model in which I-Abm12 skin allografts are accepted on Rag2−/− mice, and the function of polyclonal Treg and their specialized subsets can be investigated after cotransfer with I-Abm12–specific CD4+ T cells. Transfer of high Treg numbers established allograft tolerance, which could be reverted by specific Treg depletion. Treg-suppressed ABM expansion dependent on the initial ratio and IL-2 production of ABM increased their own and Treg numbers. Treg displayed an effector phenotype in the LN. Blockade of IL-7 or transfer of Treg from Il7ra-ΔTreg mice caused graft rejection in 40% of tolerant mice, which could be due to reduced survival in the LN. However, the ratio of Treg/ABM in rejecting mice was in favor of Treg, which usually correlated with allograft tolerance. Therefore, our results suggest that IL-7R signaling does not exclusively support Treg survival but also increases the suppressive activity of allo-activated Treg.

Structural LN-FRC and lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) are the main source of IL-7 in the LN (19, 20, 34) and increase IL-7 production on inflammatory T-cell responses (18). Consistent with this view, allogeneic CD4+ T-cell activation and release of IFNγ increased IL-7 levels in LN-FRC at early time points, which massively declined thereafter in dLN of transplanted Rag2−/− mice. Treg inhibited both IFNγ production and expansion of ABM, which correlated with an early reduction of IL-7 transcription in LN-FRC of allograft-tolerant mice. However, at later time points, the presence of Treg resulted in higher IL-7 transcription. The reasons for this are unclear, and further experiments need to be done to address this. However, Treg can influence the LN microenvironment to facilitate suppression of T cells, which would allow IL-2 consumption and suppression in close proximity of activated T cells (35), as well as help to maintain immunological tolerance (36).

Recent work has demonstrated that homeostasis and expansion of Treg depend on the presence of γc-chain cytokines including IL-7 and IL-2 (21). The development of autoimmunity in IL-2– and IL-2R–deficient mice (37), the impairment of LN organogenesis in IL-7– and IL-7R–deficient mice (38), and the dependence of various adaptive immune cells on these survival factors complicate interpretation of the results. Mice deficient in IL-7 signaling have been shown to have low numbers of Treg, and specific ablation of γc chain signaling in Treg suggests IL-7 is a critical requirement for survival (24, 31) by inhibiting FOXP3-driven apoptosis (30, 39). These observations were confirmed by our study by showing that IL-7–mediated signals increase the absolute numbers of Treg in vitro and in vivo after IL-7C treatment in mice, possibly by Bcl2- and Mcl1-dependent mechanisms (40). By cotransferring IL-7R-KO with WT-Treg, we further demonstrate that ablation of IL-7R expression diminishes Treg number in the LN after cotransfer with WT-Treg, indicating that IL-7R signaling is required on Treg to compete for sufficient IL-7 signals with other responding cells in the periphery (39).

Treg transmitted IL-7 signals via STAT5 phosphorylation, which led to increased expression of CD25, GITR, and partially ICOS in a dose-dependent manner. These surface markers are part of the genes directing the expression of the Treg molecular signature (4, 7). Our findings suggest that IL-7 signaling might optimize IL-2 acquisition (25) by increasing CD25 levels on Treg. CD25 expression in untreated and IL-7–pretreated Treg was not increased by different IL-2 doses excluding a feedback loop, which further enhances IL-2 binding. Similarly, IL-7C pretreatment increased γc chain expression, together with GITR and ICOS, in response to IL-2C. Thus, the greater IL-2 sensitivity of IL-7–exposed Treg was due to higher CD25 expression and IL-2R signaling specificity via the STAT5 pathway, which might be required to compete for low IL-2 concentrations in vivo. IL-7 and IL-7R signaling stabilized the functional competence of Treg populations that was further increased by IL-2 (41). Whether IL-7R signaling and increased IL-2 sensitivity in Treg cells enable immunological tolerance against memory T cells was not addressed here, but IL-7R expression maintains survival of memory T cells and influences their activation (42), which might lead to resistance of allogeneic memory T cells to Treg-mediated suppression (43). In addition, an effect of IL-7 on human Treg should be carefully evaluated because CD127low Treg have been described to suppress T-cell responses (44). Therefore, further studies are required to use IL-7 for improved low-dose IL-2 therapy in autoimmunity and inflammatory diseases including allograft transplantations (12).

CD44loCD62Lhi cTreg require IL-2 signaling to maintain homeostasis, and CD44hiCD62Llo eTreg depend on ICOS signals (11). cTreg were higher in CD25 than eTreg, but our results suggest that the increased expression of IL-7R might compensate for reduced IL-2 availability. Indeed, eTreg up-regulate their CD25 expression in response to increasing IL-7 levels, thereby facilitating IL-2 access required for proliferation and efficient suppression of T-cell responses. This finding suggests that IL-7R+ eTreg become more sensitive to IL-2. eTreg were found in LN during allograft responses, indicating that the suppressor function of Treg is mediated by this particular subset during inflammation. eTreg develop from Treg after TCR engagement in the presence of inflammatory cytokines (45). It remains to be tested whether IL-7R signaling promotes eTreg differentiation from cTreg or whether eTreg accumulate in the dLN by proliferation or migration from nonlymphoid tissue.

On the basis of the presented results, IL-7R signaling in eTreg may change the balance of cTreg and eTreg during inflammation due to altered IL-2 sensitivity. cTreg strictly depend on IL-2 signaling in the LN (11), and improved IL-2 sensitivity of eTreg might favor their expansion. Indeed, a limitation of IL-2 during aging has been shown to increase CD25lo Treg in mice (46). Due to impaired expansion of eTreg in the absence of IL-7R signaling, Il7ra-ΔTreg mice displayed mild symptoms of autoimmunity by formation of follicles in the liver and lung.

In conclusion, our work shows that, within LN, Treg profit from the IL-7 expression of stromal cells by increased survival and IL-2 sensitivity, which is required for sufficient suppression of effector CD4+ T-cell responses in allograft tolerance and aging. These findings demonstrate a previously unidentified role for IL-7 in control of the Treg compartment and highlight important links between Treg and stromal cells within lymphoid tissues.

Materials and Methods

Mice.

All animal work was approved by the Cantonal Veterinary Office of the City Basel (SI Materials and Methods).

Preparation of T Cells and LN Cells.

Naïve transgenic Vα2Vβ8 CD4+ T cells were isolated from LN of ABM mice. Treg were sorted from Foxp3-eGFP mice. LNSC were isolated according to the protocol (47) (SI Materials and Methods).

Skin Transplantation Model.

Recipient mice were transplanted on the back with full-thickness tail skin from allogenic I-Abm12 or syngenic I-Ab Rag2−/− mice under general anesthesia (28) (SI Materials and Methods).

In Vitro Treg Assays.

For stimulation, Treg were incubated in RPMI medium containing rmIL-7 or rmIL-2 with or without CD3/CD28 activation beads (Invitrogen) or on splenocytes (SI Materials and Methods).

Statistical Analyses.

Statistical analyses of data were performed using Prism (GraphPad Software) using the unpaired two-tailed Student t test, Mann–Whitney t test, and log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.

For IL-2 binding assays, flow cytometry, and histology details, please see SI Materials and Methods.

SI Materials and Methods

Mice.

All animals were bred in the Animal Facility of the Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital of Basel, according to the regulations of Swiss veterinary law. WT inbred C57BL/6, Rag2−/−, IFNγ−/−, Bm12 Rag2−/−, and TCR tg mice ABM Rag2−/− reactive to MHCII I-Abm12, Foxp3-eGFP, Foxp3-YFP-Cre, Foxp3-DTR, IL-7Rαfl/fl mice (31), and conditional KO mice with targeted deletion of IL-7Rα in Foxp3+ cells were generated by mating IL-7Rafl/fl mice with Foxp3-YFP-Cre. Unless stated otherwise, all figures are representative of experiments with healthy 6- to 10-wk-old mice.

Generation of IL-7Rα Deficiency to Foxp3+ Cells.

Specific deletion of IL-7Rα in Foxp3+ cells at the protein level was assessed by flow cytometry. Recombination of Il7ra at the genomic DNA level was performed on a highly pure sorted cell population to specifically detect Il7rafl and deleted Il7ra: IL-7R forward, 5-GGGGCTCTTTTACGAGTGAAATGC-3; IL-7R reverse wt/fl, 5-TGTGAGTCTGAGGTAGATGGCCTGC-3; IL-7R reverse ko/ko, 5-TGTGAGTCTGAGGTAGATGGCCTGC-3.

Antibodies and Reagents.

Monoclonal antibodies recognizing TCR Vα2 (B20.1), TCR Vβ8.1, 8.2 (KJ16-133.18), CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD11c (N418), CD16/32 (93), CD25/IL-2Rα (PC61, PC61.5), CD31 (390), CD44 (IM7), CD45.2 (104), CD62L (MEL-14), CD122/IL-2Rβ (5H4), CD127/IL-7Rα, (A7R34), CD132/γc (TUGm2), CD278/ICOS (7E.17G9), GITR CD357 (DTR-1), podoplanin (gp38, 8.1.1), IFNγ (XMG1.2), FOXP3 (150D), MHCII (AF6-120.1, 25–9-17), pSTAT5 (47), Ki67 (B56), Bcl-2 (3F11), and fluorochrome-labeled streptavidins, and the fixation and permeabilization kit with BD GolgiStop, were purchased from Biolegend, eBioscience, Cell Signaling, and BD Pharmingen. Specificity of staining was confirmed with isotype-matched control antibodies or nonstained samples. The proliferation dyes eFluor670 was purchased from eBioscience, and the BrdU Flow Kit was from BD Pharmingen. Recombinant IL-7 and IFNγ were purchased from Prepro Tech. IL-2 was provided by Matthias Kreuzaler [Department of Biomedicine (DBM), Basel, Switzerland]. The IL-7 complex was formed by incubation of recombinant mouse IL-7 and anti–IL-7 Ab (M25, provided by Daniela Finke, DBM, Basel, Switzerland). The IL-2 complex was formed by incubation of IL-2 and anti–IL-2 (JES-6, provided by Matthias Kreuzaler and Antonius Rolink, DBM Basel, Switzerland). Sandwich ELISAs were purchased from BD Biosciences and R&D Systems. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin were purchased from Sigma, collagenase IV was from Worthington, and DNaseI and collagenase D were from Roche.

Skin Transplantation Model.

Recipient mice were transplanted on the back with full-thickness tail skin from allogenic I-Abm12 or syngenic I-Ab Rag2−/− mice under general anesthesia (28). After transplantation of Rag2−/− mice, naïve ABM and Treg were adoptively transferred (i.v.) into recipient mice at different ratios. At indicated time points, LN and skin grafts were collected, cells were isolated, and LN extracts were prepared (47). To deplete diphtheria-receptor expressing Treg after adoptive transfer, transplanted mice were i.p. treated three times with 0.4 mg diphtheria toxin (Merk).

Preparation of T Cells and LN Cells.

Naïve transgenic Vα2Vβ8 CD4+ T cells were isolated from LN of ABM mice. Treg were sorted from Foxp3-eGFP mice. LNSC were isolated from naive, transplanted, or IFNγ treated (10,000 U) mice according to the protocol (47).

Sorting.

GFP- or YFP-positive Treg cells were sorted with a 70-μm tip at a pressure of 60 psi. LN-FRC were stained for CD45, CD11c, gp38, and CD31 and sorted with a 100-µm tip at a pressure of 30 psi. The purity of sorted cells routinely exceeded 98% with an Influx cell sorter (BD).

Flow Cytometry.

Cell suspensions were stained in ice-cold HBSS supplemented with 2% (vol/vol) FCS for surface staining. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stained for surface markers, fixed, and then resuspended in permeabilization buffer containing anti-IFNγ. Phosphorylation of STAT5 was assessed in stimulated T cells after fixation and permeabilization by intracellular staining according to protocol (BD Biosciences). Data were acquired on a FACS Canto II and LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar).

In Vitro Treg Assays.

For stimulation, Treg (5 × 103/well to 5 × 104/well) were incubated in RPMI medium containing rmIL-7 or rmIL-2 (Peprotech) with or without CD3/CD28 activation beads (Invitrogen) or on irradiated splenocytes. To determine cytokine sensitivity, Treg were incubated with IL-7 or medium for 24 h, washed with HBSS, and then stimulated with different IL-2 and IL-7 concentrations.

In suppression assays, eFluor670-stained ABM and different ratios of Treg were activated with CD3/CD28 activation beads in the presence of cytokines. Proliferation and up- or down-regulation of surface markers on T cells were measured by flow cytometry.

IL-2 Binding Assay.

IL-2 was biotinylated using EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-Biotin (Thermo Scientific) and incubated with Treg treated with IL-7 or medium. After 30 min of stimulation, Treg were incubated with biotinylated IL-2 followed by staining with streptavidin.

RT-PCR from Cells.

mRNA was isolated from sorted LN stromal cell subsets by a µMACS mRNA Isolation Kit. cDNA was synthesized using a One-step cDNA Kit from Miltenyi Biotech according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification was done in a 10-µL volume with GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega) and analyzed with an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Real-Time PCR System. The following program was used: 40 cycles of 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min. Primers for RT-PCR were designed using the Universal ProbeLibrary Assay Design Center from Roche Applied Biosystems and synthesized by Microsynth.

Histology.

Organs were fixed with 4% (wt/vol) formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxilin and eosin for pathological signs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. E. Palmer (Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel) for expert assistance and advice, Prof. A. Tzankov (University Hospital Basel) for pathological analysis of organs, and E. Palmer, A. Singer (National Institutes of Health), B. Malissen (INSERM), and A. Rudensky (Memorial Sloan Kettering Center) for providing mice. We thank E. Traunecker and T. Krebs for sorting cell populations for analysis. This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Grants PPOOA-320_119204 and PPOOP3_144918 (to S.W.R.), Freiwillige Akademischen Gesellschaft (FAG)-Basel grant (to S.W.R.), and SNSF Grant 310030_153247 (to D.F.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1510045112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Malek TR, Castro I. Interleukin-2 receptor signaling: At the interface between tolerance and immunity. Immunity. 2010;33(2):153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Josefowicz SZ, Lu L-F, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:531–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bailey-Bucktrout SL, et al. Self-antigen-driven activation induces instability of regulatory T cells during an inflammatory autoimmune response. Immunity. 2013;39(5):949–962. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rubtsov YP, et al. Stability of the regulatory T cell lineage in vivo. Science. 2010;329(5999):1667–1671. doi: 10.1126/science.1191996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huynh A, et al. Control of PI(3) kinase in Treg cells maintains homeostasis and lineage stability. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(2):188–196. doi: 10.1038/ni.3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155(3):1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liston A, Gray DHD. Homeostatic control of regulatory T cell diversity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(3):154–165. doi: 10.1038/nri3605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nelson BH. IL-2, regulatory T cells, and tolerance. J Immunol. 2004;172(7):3983–3988. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.3983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu Y, et al. FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function through cooperation with NFAT. Cell. 2006;126(2):375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de la Rosa M, Rutz S, Dorninger H, Scheffold A. Interleukin-2 is essential for CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell function. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(9):2480–2488. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smigiel KS, et al. CCR7 provides localized access to IL-2 and defines homeostatically distinct regulatory T cell subsets. J Exp Med. 2014;211(1):121–136. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Klatzmann D, Abbas AK. The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(5):283–294. doi: 10.1038/nri3823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burchill MA, et al. Distinct effects of STAT5 activation on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell homeostasis: Development of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells versus CD8+ memory T cells. J Immunol. 2003;171(11):5853–5864. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.11.5853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Passerini L, et al. STAT5-signaling cytokines regulate the expression of FOXP3 in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and CD4+CD25- effector T cells. Int Immunol. 2008;20(3):421–431. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zheng Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of Foxp3 target genes in developing and mature regulatory T cells. Nature. 2007;445(7130):936–940. doi: 10.1038/nature05563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davidson TS, DiPaolo RJ, Andersson J, Shevach EM. Cutting Edge: IL-2 is essential for TGF-beta-mediated induction of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol. 2007;178(7):4022–4026. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.7.4022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fry TJ, Mackall CL. The many faces of IL-7: From lymphopoiesis to peripheral T cell maintenance. J Immunol. 2005;174(11):6571–6576. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.6571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Malhotra D, et al. Immunological Genome Project Consortium Transcriptional profiling of stroma from inflamed and resting lymph nodes defines immunological hallmarks. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(5):499–510. doi: 10.1038/ni.2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Link A, et al. Fibroblastic reticular cells in lymph nodes regulate the homeostasis of naive T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(11):1255–1265. doi: 10.1038/ni1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Onder L, et al. IL-7-producing stromal cells are critical for lymph node remodeling. Blood. 2012;120(24):4675–4683. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-416859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mackall CL, Fry TJ, Gress RE. Harnessing the biology of IL-7 for therapeutic application. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(5):330–342. doi: 10.1038/nri2970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kimura MY, et al. 2013. IL-7 signaling must be intermittent, not continuous, during CD8(+) T cell homeostasis to promote cell survival instead of cell death. Nat Immunol 14(2):143–151.
  • 23.Simonetta F, et al. Increased CD127 expression on activated FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(9):2528–2538. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Simonetta F, et al. Interleukin-7 influences FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells peripheral homeostasis. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simonetta F, Gestermann N, Bloquet S, Bourgeois C. Interleukin-7 optimizes FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells reactivity to interleukin-2 by modulating CD25 expression. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mazzucchelli R, et al. Development of regulatory T cells requires IL-7Ralpha stimulation by IL-7 or TSLP. Blood. 2008;112(8):3283–3292. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tani-ichi S, et al. Interleukin-7 receptor controls development and maturation of late stages of thymocyte subpopulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(2):612–617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219242110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schmaler M, Broggi MAS, Rossi SW. 2014. Transplantation of tail skin to study allogeneic CD4 T cell responses in mice. JoVE (89):e51724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Rosenberg AS, Singer A. Cellular basis of skin allograft rejection: An in vivo model of immune-mediated tissue destruction. Annu Rev Immunol. 1992;10:333–358. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.10.040192.002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tai X, et al. Foxp3 transcription factor is proapoptotic and lethal to developing regulatory T cells unless counterbalanced by cytokine survival signals. Immunity. 2013;38(6):1116–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McCaughtry TM, et al. Conditional deletion of cytokine receptor chains reveals that IL-7 and IL-15 specify CD8 cytotoxic lineage fate in the thymus. J Exp Med. 2012;209(12):2263–2276. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sakaguchi S, Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T. Regulatory T cells: How do they suppress immune responses? Int Immunol. 2009;21(10):1105–1111. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxp095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wood KJ, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in transplantation tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(3):199–210. doi: 10.1038/nri1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mazzucchelli RI, et al. Visualization and identification of IL-7 producing cells in reporter mice. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pandiyan P, Zheng L, Ishihara S, Reed J, Lenardo MJ. CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induce cytokine deprivation-mediated apoptosis of effector CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(12):1353–1362. doi: 10.1038/ni1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Malhotra D, Fletcher AL, Turley SJ. Stromal and hematopoietic cells in secondary lymphoid organs: Partners in immunity. Immunol Rev. 2013;251(1):160–176. doi: 10.1111/imr.12023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Setoguchi R, Hori S, Takahashi T, Sakaguchi S. Homeostatic maintenance of natural Foxp3(+) CD25(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cells by interleukin (IL)-2 and induction of autoimmune disease by IL-2 neutralization. J Exp Med. 2005;201(5):723–735. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chappaz S, Finke D. The IL-7 signaling pathway regulates lymph node development independent of peripheral lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2010;184(7):3562–3569. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim GY, et al. 2012. An in vivo IL-7 requirement for peripheral Foxp3+ regulatory T cell homeostasis. J Immunol 188(12):5859–5866.
  • 40.Pierson W, et al. 2013. Antiapoptotic Mcl-1 is critical for the survival and niche-filling capacity of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol.
  • 41.Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY. A well adapted regulatory contrivance: Regulatory T cell development and the forkhead family transcription factor Foxp3. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(4):331–337. doi: 10.1038/ni1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bradley LM, Haynes L, Swain SL. IL-7: Maintaining T-cell memory and achieving homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 2005;26(3):172–176. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang J, et al. Allograft rejection mediated by memory T cells is resistant to regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(50):19954–19959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704397104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu W, et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203(7):1701–1711. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cretney E, et al. The transcription factors Blimp-1 and IRF4 jointly control the differentiation and function of effector regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(4):304–311. doi: 10.1038/ni.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Raynor J, et al. IL-15 fosters age-driven regulatory T cell accrual in the face of declining IL-2 levels. Front Immunol. 2013;4:161. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Broggi MAS, Schmaler M, Lagarde N, Rossi SW. 2014. Isolation of murine lymph node stromal cells. JoVE (90):e51803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES