Skip to main content
Biophysics logoLink to Biophysics
. 2013 Jan 18;9:1–12. doi: 10.2142/biophysics.9.1

Distinct Conformation of ATP Molecule in Solution and on Protein

Eri Kobayashi 1, Kei Yura 1,2,3,, Yoshinori Nagai 4
PMCID: PMC4629688  PMID: 27493535

Abstract

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a versatile molecule used mainly for energy and a phosphate source. The hydrolysis of γ phosphate initiates the reactions and these reactions almost always start when ATP binds to protein. Therefore, there should be a mechanism to prevent spontaneous hydrolysis reaction and a mechanism to lead ATP to a pure energy source or to a phosphate source. To address these questions, we extensively analyzed the effect of protein to ATP conformation based on the sampling of the ATP solution conformations obtained from molecular dynamics simulation and the sampling of ATP structures bound to protein found in a protein structure database. The comparison revealed mainly the following three points; 1) The ribose ring in ATP molecule, which puckers in many ways in solution, tends to assume either C2′ exo or C2′ endo when it binds to protein. 2) The adenine ring in ATP molecule, which takes open-book motion with the two ring structures, has two distinct structures when ATP binds to protein. 3) The glycosyl-bond and the bond between phosphate and the ribose have unique torsion angles, when ATP binds to protein. The combination of torsion angles found in protein-bound forms is under-represented in ATP molecule in water. These findings suggest that ATP-binding protein exerts forces on ATP molecule to assume a conformation that is rarely found in solution, and that this conformation change should be a trigger for the reactions on ATP molecule.

Keywords: adenosine triphosphate, curvature, database analysis, molecular dynamics simulation, torsion angle


Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a widely used molecule in the cell for an energy source1. A textbook example of the use of ATP is a chemical bond formation between two substrates coupled with ATP hydrolysis catalyzed by an enzyme. In this reaction, a phosphoanhydride bond between β and γ phosphate groups is cleaved, and the released energy is used to condense the substrates. The released energy can also be a trigger for alteration of the conformation of protein2. In either case, the remaining adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and the inorganic phosphate are released to water. Some of the reactions yield an inorganic diphosphate by cleaving the bond between α and β phosphate groups3. Other than the reaction to gain energy, ATP is utilized as a source for phosphate group, adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and adenine. These chemical groups are utilized for phosphorylation that transfers the inorganic phosphate to the substrate4, adenylation that transfers AMP to the substrate5, and adenosylation that transfers adenosyl to the substrate6, respectively.

The use of the same ATP molecules in a variety of chemical reactions is evidently based on its versatility in the conformation, but the mechanism for regulating the conformation for distinct functions has not been addressed. The ATP molecule that undertakes a hydrolysis between β and γ phosphate groups, for instance, should block the chemical reaction pathways to phosphorylation, adenylation and others, otherwise the unrelated functions would be carried out. In addition, ATP molecule in water needs to have a certain mechanism to stay away from the chemically reactive situations leading to a spontaneous hydrolysis.

These conjectures can be tested by protein structure database analysis and computer simulation. Accumulation of the coordinate data of ATP bound to the proteins enabled us to obtain ATP conformations on proteins at the variety of functions. Improvements in simulation techniques and computer hardware enable us to sample conformations of ATP in water. Comparisons of these ATP conformations will give us a clue to solidify the conjecture.

Here, we compared the structures of ATP molecules in Protein Data Bank (PDB)7 and those sampled from the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. We found that the conformation of protein-bound ATP is under-represented in ATP in water, which suggests that ATP molecule should be forced to take a specific conformation on a protein to initiate biological functions.

Methods

Choosing proteins with ATP molecule from PDB

Three-dimensional coordinate data of protein structure with ATP were selected from PDB7. The protein entries with coordinates of ATP were first selected on Het-PDB Navi.8 using “ATP” as a query term. Redundancy in entries was eliminated by grouping the proteins with their sequence identity. The interactions between protein chain and ATP molecule were detected by differences in accessible surface areas of the protein chain when the area was calculated with and without the ATP molecule. We calculated the accessible surface area by the in-house program and the program is now available at http://cib.cf.ocha.ac.jp/bitool/ASA/. The calculation is based on the method of Shrake and Rupley9. Chains with less than 60 amino acid residues were discarded. Classification of proteins by sequence identity was carried out using BLASTClust10. The sequence identity for the classification was set to 25%. From each group, a protein chain with the best resolution was selected as the representative.

Conformation sampling of ATP molecule by molecular dynamics simulation

Molecular dynamics simulation of ATP was performed to sample conformations of ATP in water. The initial structure of ATP was taken from the three-dimensional structure data of Thermus thermophilus D-alanine:D-alanine ligase (PDB ID, 2zdq)11. The ATP numbered 1501 in A chain was used. For the calculation, GROMACS 4.0.412 was used. We employed a standard NPT procedure for the simulation described in the manual of GROMACS. We used the force field for ATP molecule implemented in ffG43a1.rtp file. The file described the parameters for all the atoms of ATP except for methyl hydrogen atoms, which were united to the bonded carbon atoms. A hydrogen atom not described in PDB file was geometrically generated at an allowed position. The geometric center of the ATP molecule was then placed at the center of a cube with 2.7×104 Å3 volume filled with water molecules with periodic boundary condition. By removing water molecule overlapping with ATP, the number of water molecules was settled to 876. After minimizing the energy of the system by steepest decent method and performing molecular dynamics with restraint on ATP in 1 ns, we performed 2 ns simulation of ATP in solvent with 2 fs step size. The temperature was set in 300 K. Cutoff distance of van der Waals and electrostatic interactions was set to 10 Å. We ran ten different sets of the simulation starting with a different random-number seed. From each trajectory file, coordinates of ATP in every 0.1 ps were retrieved and snapshot structures from the latter 1 ns simulation were used for analyses.

Comparison of ATP structures: torsion angle and ring curvature

Conformations of ATP molecules in protein-bound and free forms were compared by torsion angles of bonds and flatness of ring structures.

Torsion angles in ATP were defined as shown in Figure 1. The definition is the same as the ones commonly used in DNA and RNA (see Chapter 5 of Schlick T.13, for instance). A torsion angle of a glycosyl bond (C1′-N9), for example, is defined by O4′, C1′, N9 and C4. The cis position of O4′ and C4 is defined as zero degree and the clockwise rotation of the N9-C4 bond viewed in C1′-N9 direction is defined as a positive rotation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Definition of the torsion angle for ATP molecule. Each torsion angle is named as shown in the right box. In the box, the torsion angle of the bond by the second and the third atoms is defined by the rotation between the first-second and the third-fourth bonds. cis location of the first and the fourth atoms is defined as zero degree. The order of the atoms also defines the sign of rotation, namely clockwise rotation of the fourth atom against the first atom is defined as a positive rotation. The arrows in the figure depict the positive rotation of the bond.

Flatness of the ring structure of ribose and adenine was calculated using discrete Gaussian curvature (K) and mean curvature (H) descriptions (Fig. 2). The Gaussian curvature at a point on a surface is defined as a product of the maximum and minimum curvatures of a plane embedding the normal vector of the point (the principal curvatures), and the mean curvature is defined as a mean of the principal curvatures. With both curvatures, the degree of flatness and of puckering of a ring structure can be described. Here we employed the definition of the discrete Gaussian and mean curvatures described in references 14 and 15. The discrete Gaussian curvature at the gravity center of a ring can be calculated as;

K=3(2π(i,j)θij)(i,j)Aij,

and the discrete mean curvature at the gravity center can be calculated as;

H=3i(πδi)li(i,j)Aij.

In these calculations, Aij is the area of triangle spanned by atoms i, j and the gravity center of the ring, θij is the angle in radian between the two lines, the line connecting atom i and the gravity center, and the line connecting atom j and the gravity center, δi is the torsion angle in radian between two triangles over the line drawn between atom i and the gravity center, and li is the length of the line drawn between atom i and the gravity center. The subscripts i and j go over all the atoms for the ring14,15. For the curvature calculation of the ribose, namely C1′, C2′, C3′, C4′ and O4′ atoms were used. Curvature calculation for the two ring structures in adenine was done separately. For the curvature calculation of the six-membered ring in the adenine, N1, C2, N3, C4, C5 and C6 atoms were used, and of the five-membered ring, C4, C5, N7, C8, and N9 atoms were used. The relative orientation of the two rings in the adenine was described by the flatness of the pseudo-hexagon consisting of C6, C5, N7, N9, C4 and N3 atoms.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The definition of the discrete Gaussian and mean curvatures at the gravity center.

Intuitively, the discrete Gaussian curvature measures whether the surface is curved or not, whilst the discrete mean curvature measures the degree of the mixture of the concaveness and convexness. In this analysis, the Gaussian curvature at the gravity center of the ring is always negative. The sign of the mean curvature depends on the strength of concaveness and convexness of the ring structure at the gravity center. Flatness and puckering of the ring can be described by both curvatures through concaveness and convexness.

Results and Discussion

Coordinate set of ATP from PDB

The set of proteins with ATP in PDB is shown in Table 1. There were 188 unique protein-ATP complex. The uniqueness was defined by the sequence identity of the proteins. No proteins in the set have sequence identity more than 25% based on the calculation by BLASTClust10. The biological uniqueness of these proteins was checked based on Uni Prot16 ID. UniProt ID is basically built by protein function abbreviation with a species name abbreviation connected by an underscore. None of the entries in Table 1 has the same protein function based on the UniProt ID.

Table 1.

Functional classification of ATP-binding proteins

ATP hydrolysis, Pi is released (energy extration reaction)
  Protein Name Family PDB ID chain resol Uniprot ID

  vacuolar protein sorting-associating protein 4B AAA ATPase family 2zan A 3.00 VPS4B_MOUSE
  N-ethylmaleide sensitive factor AAA ATPase family 1nsf A 1.90 NSF_CRIGR
  FbpC nucleotide-binding domain ABC transporter domain 3fvq B 1.90 FBPC_NEIG1
  histidine permease ABC transporter superfamily 1b0u A 1.50 HISP_SALTY
  maltose/maltodextrin transport ATP-binding protein MalK ABC transporter superfamily 1q12 A 2.60 MALK_ECOLI
  ATP-binding cassette sub-family B meber 6 ABCB family 3nh9 A 2.10 ABCB6_HUMAN
  alpha actin 1 actin family 2fxu A 1.35 ACTS_RABIT
  actin-related protein 2 actin family 1tyq B 2.55 ARP3_BOVIN
  arsenical Pump-driving ATPase arsA ATPase family 1ii0 B 2.40 ARSA1_ECOLI
  ATP synthase subunit alpha ATPase alpha/beta chains family 2r9v A 2.10 ATPA_THEMA
  v-type ATP synthase beta chain ATPase alpha/beta chains family 3b2q A 2.10 VATB_METMA
  biotin carboxylase biotin carboxylation domain 1dv2 A 2.50 ACCC_ECOLI
  sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulumn calcium ATPase 1 cation transport ATPase (P-type) family 3ar4 A 2.15 AT2A1_RABIT
  GroEL chaperonin (HSP60) family 1kp8 A 2.00 CH60_ECOLI
  heat shock locus U (HslU) clpX chaperone family 1do0 A 3.00 HSLU_ECOLI
  DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1 DNA mismatch repair mutL/hexB family 3na3 A 2.50 MLH1_HUMAN
  DNA mismatch repair protein MutS DNA mismatch repair mutS family 1w7a A 2.27 MUTS_ECOLI
  PurL, Formylglycinamide ribonucleotide amidotransferase FGAMS family 2hs0 A 2.52 PURL_THEMA
  Gar synthetase (PurD) GARS family 2yw2 A 1.80 PUR2_AQUAE
  aspartyl/glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase subunit B gatB/gatE family 3h0r H 3.00 GATB_AQUAE
  70kDa heat shock cognate protein heat shock protein 70 family 1kax A 1.70 HSP7C_BOVIN
  PcrA DNA helicase helicase family 1qhh B 2.50 PCRA_BACST
  nitrogenase iron protein 1 nifH/bchL/chlL family 2c8v A 2.50 NIH1_AZOVI
  cell division inhibitor MinD parA family 3q9l A 2.34 MIND_ECOLI
  bacterial chromosome segregation protein SoJ ParAB family 2bek A 1.80 Q72H90_THET2
  5-formaminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl 5′-monophosphate synthetase phosphohexose mutase family 2r7l A 2.10 PURP_METJA
  phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase ATPase subunit purK/purT family 3eth A 1.60 PURK_ECOLI
  glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (purT) purK/purT family 1kj9 B 1.60 PURT_ECOLI
  Holliday junction DNA helicase RuvB ruvB family 1j7k A 1.80 RUVB_THEMA
  phoshpribosylamidoimidazole-succinocarboxamide synthase SAICAR synthetase family 1obd A 1.40 PUR7_YEAST
  translocase SecA subunit secA family 2fsg B 2.20 SECA_ECOLI
  larget T antigen helicase domain SF3 helicase domain 1svm C 1.94 LT_SV40
  Psp operon transcriptional activator (PspF) sigma-54 factor interaction domain 2c96 A 1.80 PSPF_ECOLI
  Rad50 ABC-ATPase N-terminal domain SMC family 1f2u A 1.60 RAD50_PYRFU
  sulfiredoxin sulfiredoxin family 3cyi A 1.80 SRXN1_HUMAN
  NTPase P4 (molecular motor) superfamily 4 helicase motif 2vhq A 2.15 Q94M05_9VIRU
  transglutaminase 2 Transglutaminase family 3ly6 A 3.14 TGM2_HUMAN
  EcoR124I restriction enzyme HSDR subunit typeII restriction enzyme 2w00 B 2.60 Q304R3_ECOLX
  UvrABC component UvrB uvrB family 1d9z A 3.15 UVRB_BACCA
  twitching motility protein PilT not classified 2eww A 3.20 O66950_AQUAE
  transcriptional regulatory protein ZraR not classified 1ojl E 3.00 ZRAR_SALTY
  myosin II heavy chain not classified 1fmw A 2.15 MYS2_DICDI
  dethiobiotin synthetase not classified 1a82 A 1.80 BIOD_ECOLI

ATP hydrolysis, Pi is transferred (phosphprylation)
  Protein Name Family PDB ID chain resol Uniprot ID

  isocitrate dehydrogenase kinase/phosphatase (AceK) AceK family 3eps A 2.80 ACEK_ECO57
  cAMP-dependent protein kinase AGC Ser/Thr protein kinase family 3fjq E 1.60 KAPCA_MOUSE
  protein kinase C iota type AGC Ser/Thr protein kinase family: PKC subfamily 3a8w B 2.10 KPCI_HUMAN
  G protein coupled receptor kinase 1 (crystals of 6 different states) AGC Ser/Thr protein kinsae family: GRK kinase family 3c4w B 2.70 RK_BOVIN
  myosin heavy chain kinase A alpha-type protein kinase family 3lmi B 2.20 MHCKA_DICDI
  Isopentenyl phosphate kinase Amino acid kinase family 3ll5 C 1.99 Q9HLX1_THEAC
  anti-sigma F factor anti-sigma-factor family 1tid A 2.50 SP2AB_BACST
  ribokinase carbohydrate kinase pfkB family 3ikh A 1.88 A6T989_KLEP7
  casein kinase-1 CK1 Ser/Thr protein kinase family 1csn A 2.00 CKI1_SCHPO
  dephospho-CoA kinase coaE family 1jjv A 2.00 COAE_HAEIN
  mevalonate kinase GHMP kinase family 1kvk A 2.40 KIME_RAT
  gluconate kinase gluconokinase gntK/gntV family 1ko5 A 2.28 GNTK_ECOLI
  Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate 3-kinase B inositol phosphokinase (IPK) family 2aqx A 2.50 IP3KB_RAT
  KaiC kaiC family 2gbl A 2.80 KAIC_SYNP7
  l-seryl-tRNA kinase L-seryl-tRNA(Sec) kinase family 3am1 A 2.40 PSTK_METJA
  NAD kinase NAD kinase family 1z0s A 1.70 PPNK_ARCFU
  nucleotide diphosphate kinase NDK family 1wkl B 2.20 NDK_THET8
  pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isoform 2 PDK/BCKDK protein kinase family 2bu2 A 2.40 PDK2_HUMAN
  phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase family 2olr A 1.60 PPCK_ECOLI
  phosphofruktokinase phosphofructokinase family 3o8l A 3.20 K6PF_RABIT
  phosphoglycerate kinase phosphoglycerate kinase family 1vjd A 1.90 PGK1_PIG
  phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit PI3/PI4-kinase family 1e8x A 2.20 PK3CG_PIG
  polyhosphate kinase polyphosphate kinase family 1xdp A 2.50 PPK_ECOLI
  Pantothenate kinase prokaryotic pantothenate kinase family 2zsf A 2.80 COAA_MYCTU
  cell division protein kinse 2 protein kinase superfamily 2cch A 1.70 CDK2_HUMAN
  pyridoxine kinase pyridoxine kinase family 2ddo A 2.60 PDXK_ECOLI
  pyruvate kinase pyruvate kinase family 1a49 A 2.10 KPYM_RABIT
  Rio1 serine kinase RIO-type Ser/Thr kinase family 1zp9 A 2.00 RIO1_ARCFU
  Rio2 serine kinase RIO-type Ser/Thr kinase family 1zao A 1.84 RIO2_ARCFU
  mitotic checkpoint serine/threonin-protein kinase Bub1 Ser/Thr protein kinase family 3e7e A 2.31 BUB1_HUMAN
  SR protein kinase Ser/Thr protein kinase family 1q97 A 2.30 SKY1_YEAST
  shikimate kinase shikimate kinase family 2iyw A 1.85 AROK_MYCTU
  Tao2 kinase domain STE20 subfamily 1u5r A 2.10 TAOK2_RAT
  thymidylate kinase thymidylate kinase family 1e2q A 1.70 KTHY_HUMAN
  thiazole kinase Thz kinase family 1esq C 2.50 THIM_BACSU
  MET receptor tyrosine kinase Tyr protein kinase family 3dkc A 1.52 A1L467_HUMAN
  phosphofruktokinase not classified 3f5m B 2.70 O15648_9TRYP
  D-alanine-D-alanine ligase not classified 2zdq A 2.30 Q5SHZ3_THET8
  chloramphenicol phosphotransferase not classified 1qhx A 2.50 CPT_STRVL
  aminoglycoside phosphotransferase not classified 3hav B 2.45 Q9EVD7_ENTFC
  Thiamine monophosphate kinase not classified 3c9r A 2.30 O67883_AQUAE
  UMP kinase not classified 2jjx A 2.82 Q81S73_BACAN

ATP hydrolysis, PPi is released (energy extration reaction)
  Protein Name Family PDB ID chain resol Uniprot ID

  adenylate cyclase type 5 adenylyl cyclase class-4/guanylyl cyclase family 3c16 A 2.87 ADCY5_CANFA
  argininosuccinate synthetase argininosuccinate synthase family 1kp3 A 2.00 ASSY_ECOLI
  beta-lactam synthetase asparagine synthetase family 1mb9 B 2.11 BLS_STRCL
  Acyl-coenzyme A synthetase Acsm2A ATP-dependent AMP-binding enzyme 3c5e A 1.60 ACS2A_HUMAN
  D-alanine-polyphosphoribitol ligase subunit 1 ATP-dependent AMP-binding enzyme family 3fce A 1.90 DLTA_BACCR
  DNA ligase from bacteriophage T7 ATP-dependent DNA ligase family 1a0i A 2.60 DNLI_BPT7
  tryptophan-tRNA synthetase class-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase familiy 1mau A 2.15 SYW_BACST
  glutamyl-tRNA synthetase class-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase familiy 1j09 A 1.80 SYE_THET8
  glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase class-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 1gtr A 2.50 SYQ_ECOLI
  tyrosine-tRNA synthetase class-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 1h3e A 2.90 SYY_THETH
  tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase class-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 2qui A 2.40 SYWC_HUMAN
  histidyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase familiy 1kmn C 2.80 SYH_ECOLI
  prolyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 2i4o A 2.40 SYP_RHOPA
  Class II AARS homologue (bll0957) class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 3mey A 2.50 Q89VT8_BRAJA
  Lysyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 3bju A 2.31 SYK_HUMAN
  glycyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 2zt7 A 2.70 SYG_HUMAN
  pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 2q7g A 1.90 PYLS_METMA
  aspartyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 3nem B 1.89 SYD_PYRKO
  Threonyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 1nyr A 2.80 SYT_STAAW
  alanyl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 1yfr A 2.15 SYA_AQUAE
  serryl-tRNA synthetase class-II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase family 3lss B 1.95 Q384V4_9TRYP
  tRNA-lysidine synthase tRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthase family 2e89 A 2.50 TILS_AQUAE
  prolyl-tRNA synthetase not classified 2j3m B 2.30 Q831W7_ENTFA
  serryl-tRNA synthetase not classified 2cja B 2.20 Q46AN5_METBA
  NH3-dependent NAD+ synthetase NAD synthetase family 1xng B 1.70 NADE_HELPY
  bacteriophage phi 6 RNA dependent RNA polymerase Polymerase family 1hi1 A 3.00 RDRP_BPPH6
  tRNA CCA-pyrophosphorylase tRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase family 3h39 B 2.85 Q9WZH4_THEMA
  polyA polymerase tRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase family 3aqn A 3.30 C9QS13_ECOD1
  RNA editing ligase Mp52 not classified 1xdn A 1.20 RLGM1_TRYBB

ATP hydrolysis, PPi is released and AMP is transferred (adenylation)
  Protein Name Family PDB ID chain resol Uniprot ID

  nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) adenylyltransferase archaeal NMN adenylyltransferase family 1f9a A 2.00 NADM_METJA
  phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase bacterial coaD family 1gn8 A 1.83 COAD_ECOLI
  glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase small bacterial/plant glucose-1-phosphate 1yp3 C 2.60 GLGS_SOLTU
  subunit adenylyltransferase family
  DNA polymerase IV DNA polymerase type-Y family 3m9o B 2.00 DPO42_SULSO
  adenylyltransferase ThiF hesA/moeB/thiF family 1zfn A 2.75 THIF_ECOLI
  lipoate-protein ligase A lplA family 2aru A 2.50 LPLA_THEAC
  nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferase nadD family 1yun A 2.00 NADD_PSEAE
  pantoate-beta-alanine ligase pantothenate synthetase family 2a84 A 1.55 PANC_MYCTU
  polyA polymerase poly(A) polymerase family 2q66 A 1.80 PAP_YEAST
  tRNA CCA-pyrophosphrylase tRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase family 3ovb A 1.95 CCA_ARCFU
  ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1C (Uba3) ubiquitin-activating E1 family 1r4n B 3.60 UBA3_HUMAN
  ubiquitin-like 2 activating enzyme E1B ubiquitin-activating E1 family 1y8q D 2.25 ULE1B_HUMAN
  ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 5 ubiquitin-activating E1 family 3h8v A 2.00 UBA5_HUMAN
  biotin protien ligase not classified 2dto A 1.50 O57883_PYRHO
  FMN adenylyltransferase not classified 3g59 A 1.87 Q6FNA9_CANGA

ATP hydrolysis, PPPi is relased and adenosine is transferred (adenosylation)
  Protein Name Family PDB ID chain resol Uniprot ID

  methionine adenosyltransferase AdoMet synthse family 1o9t A 2.90 METK1_RAT
  CoB(I)alamin adenosyltransferase Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase family 1g5t A 1.80 BTUR_SALTY
  CoB(I)yrinic acid A,C-diamide adenosyltransferase Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase family 2idx A 2.50 MMAB_HUMAN

Others
  Protein Name Family PDB ID chain resol Uniprot ID

  7,8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethylpterin-pyrophosphokinase HPPK family 1dy3 A 2.00 HPPK_ECOLI
  Preneck appendage protein not classified 3gqn A 2.15 B3VMP8_BPPH2
  ATPsynthase epsilon subunit ATPase epsilon chain family 2e5y A 1.92 ATPE_BACP3
  Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1 eukaryotic release factor 1 family 3e1y A 3.80 ERF1_HUMAN
  prabable ATP-dependent RNA helicase Ddx58 helicase family 3lrr A 2.15 DDX58_HUMAN
  NAD-dependent malic enzyme malic enzymes family 1gz4 A 2.20 MAOM_HUMAN
  DCP2 protein Nudix hydrolase family 2qkm B 2.80 DCP2_SCHPO
  acetylglutamate kinase-like protein P(II) protein family 2rd5 D 2.51 GLNB_ARATH
  STRADalpha STE Ser/Thr protein kinase family 3gni B 2.35 STRAA_HUMAN
  redox-sensing transcriptional repressor Rex transcriptional regulatory rex family 2vt3 B 2.00 REX_BACSU
  transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 transient receptor 2pnn A 2.70 TRPV1_RAT
  polyhedrin not classified 2oh5 A 1.98 O10693_CPVBM
  pertussis toxin subunit 4 not classified 1bcp E 2.70 TOX4_BORPE
  non-biological protein not classified 2p09 A 1.65
  5′-AMP-activated protein kinase catalytic subunit alpha-1 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase gamma subunit family 2v92 E 2.40 AAKG1_RAT
  apoptosis regulator Ced4 AAA+ family/CARD domain/NB-ARC domain 2a5y B 2.60 CED4_CAEEL
  Clp1(inactive form) Clp1 family 2npi A 2.95 CLP1_YEAST
  Rck dmain of YuaA protein ktrA potassium transport (TC 2.A.38.4) family 2hmu A 2.25 KTRA_BACSU
  nitrogen regulatory protein P-II P(II) protein family 2xbp A 1.20 GLNB_SYNE7
  O-sialoglycoprotien endopeptidase (probably miss annotation, in reality, AP endonuclease) peptidase M22 family 2ivp A 2.50 GCP_PYRAB
  Rat synapsin I synapsin family 1pk8 A 2.10 SYN1_RAT
  putative uncharacterized protein TTHA0350 not classified 3ab8 A 1.70 Q5SLE3_THET8
  phosphofruktokinase not classified 3opy B 3.05 Q8TGA0_PICPA
  chloride channel protein 5 (clc-5) chloride channel family 2j9l C 2.30 CLCN5_HUMAN
  gluconate kinase FGGY kinase family 3ll3 A 2.00 Q5FM28_LACAC
  Hypothetical protein YfbG fmt family/ sugar epimerase familiy 1z7e D 3.00 ARNA_ECOLI
  ATP-dependent molecular chaperone Hsp82 heat shock protein 90 family 2cg9 B 3.10 HSP82_YEAST
  DNA packaging protein Gp17 myoviridae large terminase family 2o0h A 1.88 TERL_BPT4
  AP4a hydrolase Nudix hydrolase family 2pq1 A 1.95 O66548_AQUAE
  aspartate carbamoyltransferase regulatory chain (PyrI) PyrI family 2yww B 2.00 PYRI_METJA
  ribonucleotide reductase R1 ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase large chain family 3r1r A 3.00 RIR1_ECOLI
  SMC protein SMC family 1xex A 2.50 SMC_METJA
  molybdenum storage protein subunit alpha UMP kinase family 2ogx A 1.60 MOSA_AZOVD
  uncharacterized protein universal stress protein A family 3cis G 2.90 O06189_MYCTU
  Actin-depolymerizing factor Brevin villin/gelsolin family 2fgh A 2.80 GELS_HORSE
  ethanolamine utilization protein EutJ not classified 3h1q A 2.80
  universal stress protein F not classified 3fdx A 1.58 A6T8F5_KLEP7
  alcaligin biosynthesis protein not classified 2x0q A 1.96 P94255_BORBR
  l-proline dehydrogenase alpha subunit not classified 1y56 A 2.86 O59088_PYRHO
  FtsA not classified 1e4g T 2.60 Q9WZU0_THEMA
  NTRC-like two-domain protein not classified 3fkq A 2.10
  hemerythrin-like domain protein DcrH not classified 3a8t A 2.37 Q9REU3_DESVU
  Protein Mj1225 not classified 3lfz A 2.20 Y1225_METJA
  pyridoxal kinase not classified 3ibq A 2.00 Q88YB5_LACPL
  ATP:CoB(I)alamin adenosyltransferase not classified 2zhz A 1.80 Q2SZ09_BURTA
  clbalamin adenosyltransferase PduO-like protein not classified 3gah A 1.17 Q50EJ2_LACRE
  putative ribokinase II not classified 3iq0 B 1.79 Q8FD38_ECOL6
  Universal stress protein family not classified 2z08 A 1.55 Q5SJV7_THET8
  phosphofruktokinase not classified 3ie7 A 1.60 Q929S5_LISIN
  achromobactin synthetase protein D (ACSD) not classified 2x3j A 2.00 Q93AT8_ERWCH
  MccB not classified 3h5n A 1.90 Q47506_ECOLX
  HipA not classified 3dnt B 1.66 HIPA_ECOLI
  pyruvate carboxylase not classified 3bg5 A 2.80 Q99UY8_STAAM
  probable ATP-dependent DNA ligase D not classified 2faq A 1.90 Q9I1X7_PSEAE
  ParA ATPase not classified 3ea0 B 2.20 Q8KF94_CHLTE
  small nucleolar RNP similar to Gar1 not classified 2hvy B 2.30 Q8U029_PYRFU

We checked through the literatures of all these data for the biological function of ATP molecules and tabulated them based on the function. We found that 43 were for energy extraction through Pi hydrolysis, 42 for phosphorylation, 29 for energy extraction through PPi hydrolysis, 15 for adenylation, 3 for adenosylation and the remaining 56 were miscellaneous or function unknown (Table 1).

Molecular dynamics simulation of ATP in solvent

One of the results for 2 ns ATP simulations is shown in Figure 3. For the first 200 ps, the structure of ATP molecule seemed to oscillate amongst a limited number of conformations, but after that the molecule assumed many types of conformations. The behaviour in detail was different in different runs of simulation (Supplementary Figs. 1A–I), but the overall tendency and the scale of fluctuation were quite similar. For the analyses hereafter, we used all the conformations obtained in the latter 1 ns of ten runs, namely 100,000 samples of the conformations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Root mean square deviation (RMSD) of ATP during the simulation. The calculation was done between the initial structure and structures of every 0.1 ps. All 36 atoms including hydrogen atoms were used in the calculation. Four snap shot structures were drawn in the graph. From left to right, conformations of 0 ps, 1,437 ps, 1,513 ps and 1,899 ps. This graph and the following ones were drawn by R21 except Figure 9.

Sufficiency of conformation sampling in this set of simulations is important in the following analyses. Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure 1 showed that, after 1 ns of simulation, ATP molecule underwent a compact and an extended conformations for a couple of times. These back-and-forth trajectories suggest that ATP molecule assumed quite a number of different conformations. In the following analyses, the analysis applied on conformations from each trajectory and the one applied to all as a whole did not show significant differences with a minor exception. This behaviour of the data suggests that the reasonable number of conformations was obtained in the ten runs of 2 ns simulation.

Comparison of ribose conformations

Curvature of ribose in ATP had different distributions between the one calculated from the snapshot conformation in MD simulation and the one from PDB data (Fig. 4). The Gaussian curvature of the ribose from MD simulation had normal-like distribution around −0.11 and the mean curvature had normal-like distribution around 0.02. This behaviour was almost the same in each trajectory of ten runs (Supplementary Fig. 2). The distribution of the mean curvature of the ribose from PDB was more or less the same as the distribution from MD simulation, but the distribution of the Gaussian curvature of the ribose from PDB was not in the normal form and about 70% of them lay between −0.10 and −0.05. The value of the Gaussian curvature is always negative by definition, and when the value is close to zero, the ring structure is close to a flat structure. Therefore, the comparison of the structures above suggests that the ribose in ATP is off the plane when it exists in water, but is restricted to relatively planar structure when bound to a protein. This difference is not that obvious when the structures are compared in torsion angles of the ribose ring.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ribose curvature in the conformations from molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the snap shot conformation form the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The ribose with minimum/maximum curvature values in the snap shot conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn on the histograms.

The torsion angles τ0 and τ4 can be good indicators of puckering structure of ribose ring. As shown in Figure 5, a cluster of structures at the first quadrant (τ0>0 and τ4>0) is C2′ exo conformation, the second quadrant (τ0<0 and τ4>0) is O4′ endo conformation, the third quadrant (τ0<0 and τ4<0) is basically C2′ endo conformation, and the fourth quadrant (τ0>0 and τ4<0) is O4′ exo conformation. In water, C2′ exo and C2′ endo conformations was highly dominated followed by O4′ endo conformation. When the distribution in different ten runs of simulation was examined (Supplementary Fig. 3), four runs (trajectories 01, 03, 06, 07) had more numbers of C2′ exo conformations and two runs (trajectories 05, 09) had more numbers of C2′ endo conformations. As a whole, there is a tendency to prefer both C2′ exo and C2′ endo conformations in water. When ATP bound to protein, the number of C2′ exo and C2′ endo conformations were more or less the same and O4′ endo conformation was less populated.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Ribose torsion angles τ0 and τ4 in the conformations from molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots.

The difference in puckering seemingly has a connection to the biological role of ATP molecules. Out of 188 protein-bound ATP molecules in the dataset, 43 ATP molecules were for energy extraction through Pi hydrolysis, and 42 ATP molecules were for phosphorylation (Table 1). About 50% of 43 plus 42 ATP molecules took either C2′ exo or C2′ endo conformation. Interestingly, 33% of ATP molecules in energy extraction group (the maximum portion in the group) took C2′ endo conformation, and 33% of ATP molecules in phosphorylation group (the maximum portion in the group) took C2′ exo conformation.

Comparison of adenine conformation

We analyzed the conformation of adenine in two separate rings, namely five-membered ring and six-membered ring. The five-membered ring had a flat conformation during the MD simulation with an occasional slight deviation (Fig. 6). The distribution of the black dots in the figure, which forms an eastbound comet shape in any runs of simulation (Supplementary Fig. 4), suggests that the five-membered ring in adenine should undergo puckering in a very slight scale. The five-membered rings of adenine in the ATP molecules in PDB took a very flat conformation as visualized in the figure by red dots. Almost all the dots were found at the head of the comet shape, where both Gaussian and mean curvatures were very close to zero.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Adenine five-membered ring curvature in the conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The adenine five-membered rings with minimum/maximum curvature values in the snap shot conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn on the histograms. A chemical bond at the bottom of each figure is a glycosyl bond and six-membered ring is located at the far side.

The conformation of six-membered ring in adenine had different characteristics compared with the five-membered ring. In the conformation obtained by the MD simulation, the distribution of the Gaussian curvature was significantly different from that for the five-membered ring (Fig. 7). In the Gaussian curvature, the absolute value of the center of the distribution was significantly greater, and the width of the distribution was significantly wider than those of five-membered ring. The magnitude of distribution in the mean curvature was also greater than that of five-membered ring. These differences evidently appeared in any runs of the simulations (Supplementary Fig. 5). All of these facts indicate that the six-membered ring in solution was deviated from a flat structure in a greater scale compared with the five-membered ring. These deviations from flatness were, however, considerably adjusted when ATP molecule bound to a protein. The distribution of Gaussian curvature of six-membered ring in PDB protruded out to the east direction from the distribution of the Gaussian curvature and squeezed to the center of the mean curvature of ATP in water (red dots in Fig. 7). The six-membered ring of adenine was apparently flattened by the protein, to the extent of the flatness that rarely appeared in ATP in water.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Adenine six-membered ring curvature in the conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation and from PDB. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots, and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The adenine six-membered rings with minimum/maximum curvature values in the snap shot conformations from the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn on the histograms except for the conformation on the far right side which is derived from PDB structure (PDB ID: 2J9L). A chemical bond at the bottom of each figure is a glycosyl bond and five-membered ring is located at the far side.

Adenine structure can be approximated to two flat rings that oscillate at the connection and the oscillation motion can be observed in the MD simulation. We described the oscillation motion by defining a pseudo-ring across the two rings and calculated Gaussian and mean curvatures (Fig. 8). In the conformation obtained from the MD simulation, both Gaussian and mean curvatures had normal-like distribution and a crescent-shape distribution when combined; two edges of the crescent consisted of the conformations in the long tail of the Gaussian curvature. These distributions were observed in trajectories of ten runs (Supplementary Fig. 6). In the conformations from PDB, however, the values of the mean curvature were virtually zero and the values of the Gaussian curvature distributed around two peaks, namely the peaks at −0.75 and at −0.68. The former conformations mostly lay within the distribution of ATP in solution, but the latter conformations lay out of the range of the distribution of ATP in solution. The distribution of Gaussian curvature in PDB had no clear correlation to other values such as buriedness of ATP molecule to the protein or the function of ATP molecules, and hence the physicochemical explanation for this distinction needs further study. It seems that, due to some structural constraints, the conformation with Gaussian curvature −0.70 is prohibited in the adenine ring.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Adenine hinge motion. The hinge motion is defined by the open-book movement in five-membered and six-membered rings in the adenine molecule. A pseudo-ring was defined to assess the openness of the hinge. See the method section for the detail. A black dot is obtained from the conformation of the molecular dynamics simulation, and a red dot is from PDB. The histogram in black clarifies the distribution of black dots and the one in red clarifies the distribution of red dots. The hinge conformations with minimum/maximum curvature values in the molecular dynamics simulation were drawn. A chemical bond at the bottom of each figure is a glycosyl bond and six-membered ring is located at the far side.

Different distributions of torsion angles between the conformations of MD simulation and of PDB

The torsion around the chemical bond between the phosphate unit and the ribose (γ), and that around the glycosyl bond connecting the ribose and adenine (χ) are apparently far more flexible than the torsion angles around the bonds for ribose and adenine rings in ATP molecule (Fig. 1). However, the torsion angles around these bonds in conformations from MD simulation were heavily populated at only two states. When the conformations were counted with the bins of torsion angles digitized by 10 degrees, the densely populated bins were represented by a pair of torsion angles γ=−170 and χ=70, and by a pair of γ=−60 and χ=60. Both conformations were found around 1.0% of the whole population (Fig. 9). Different trajectories had peak population in different torsion angle pairs (Supplementary Fig. 7), but the two peaks in Figure 9 were almost consistently appeared as one of the top peaks in all trajectories. The noticeable exceptions were trajectories 5 and 6. Both trajectories did have a peak at γ=−60 and χ=60, but did not have a peak at γ=−170 and χ=70. The torsion angles γ=−90 to −180 represents a trans conformation between O5′ and C3′. The torsion angle χ=60 represents a gauche+ or syn conformation between the ribose and the adenine. Obviously the ATP molecule assumes a compact conformation by syn conformer in water.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Probability density function map of the torsion angles &gamma and χ. The left map is derived from the snap shot conformations of the molecular dynamics simulation, and the right map is from the conformations in PDB. The probability is depicted in rainbow colour scheme from blue to red in ascending order as shown in the colour bars. Note that the dynamic range of the two maps is different. One of the structures in highly populated torsion angles is shown on the top.

Peaks in a pair of torsion angles were found in different values in the conformations from PDB. The most heavily populated pair of angles was γ=50, χ=−150 (3.4%), followed by γ=50, χ=−160 (2.9%) and γ=40, χ=−120 (2.9%) (Fig. 9). The torsion angle γ=50 represents a cis conformation between O5′ and C3′.χ=−120 to −160 represents an anti conformation between the ribose and the adenine. When bound to a protein, the ATP molecule is extended over the protein.

In the population derived from MD simulation, the proportion of the conformations abundant in PDB was approximately half of the most populated conformation. Both the conformations with γ=50 and χ=−150 and the conformations with γ=50 and χ=−160 occupied about 0.4%, and the conformations with γ=40 and χ=−120 about 0.2%. In trajectory 6 in ten runs of simulations, 1% of the population was found in a pair of torsion angles close to the conformations found in PDB. This is, however, the only run with the dense population and none of the nine others had the dense population at the corresponding torsion angle pairs. On the other hand, in the population of PDB, the proportion of the conformations abundant in MD simulation was virtually none. These results strongly suggest that during the process of ATP binding to protein, the protein should exert forces on ATP molecule to assume the specific conformation that were under-represented in solution.

As mentioned above, there were three sets of torsion angles in ATP molecules that often appeared in PDB. These three sets were virtually grouped into two, namely, a pair of 50≤γ<60 and −160<χ≤−140, and a pair of 40≤γ<50 and −120<χ ≤−110 (Fig. 9). When we examined the function of ATP molecules in both peaks, we found that the proteins in the former peak had ATP for phosphorylation function twice as many as those in the latter peak (the second group in Table 1). Mildvan discussed in his review17 and his works with the coworkers, that the former peak of χ angle (they called low-antiglycosyl torsional angle) was found in ATP-Mn2+ binary complex and represented presumably an inactive form, and that the latter peak of χ angle (they called high-antiglycosyl torsional angle) was found in ATP-Mn2+-kinase ternary complex and presumably represented an active form. Combined with the current analyses, we suggest that the former peak (50≤γ<60 and −160<χ≤−140) is the set of torsion angles for inactive form and may be easily crystalized. And the latter (40≤γ<50 and −120<χ≤−110) peak is the torsion angles for active form and may be difficult for crystalization, because the conformation initiates chemical reactions. This may explain the difference in the density of population in two peaks. The over-representation of ATP molecules for phosphorylation in the former peaks can be explained by the possibility that they were much easily crystalized in the inactive form.

Conclusion

In this paper, we extensively analyzed the effect of protein to ATP conformations. It has been implicitly assumed that protein affects on ATP conformation when it binds, but there were no comprehensive study on this issue.

Based on the sampling of the ATP solution structures obtained from MD simulation, and the sampling of ATP structures bound to a protein in Protein Data Bank, the following three characteristics were found.

  1. The ribose ring in ATP molecule, which is flexible in solution, tends to assume C2′ exo or C2′ endo conformation when it binds to protein. Proteins that use ATP for energy source tend to bind ATP with C2′ endo forms. Proteins that use ATP for phosphorylation tend to bind ATP with C2′ exo forms.

  2. The adenine ring in ATP molecule, which assumes open-book motion with the two ring structures, has two distinct structures when ATP binds to protein. One of the structures is commonly found in solution but the other not. The physicochemical background of this distinction needs further study.

  3. The torsion angles of glycosyl bond (χ) and the bond between phosphate unit and the ribose (γ) take unique values when ATP binds to protein. The combination of the torsion angles well populated in solution rarely found in the ATP molecule on the protein. There are two well-populated torsion angles in ATP bound to proteins, one of which may represent active form and the other inactive form.

These findings suggest that ATP-binding protein forces ATP to take rare conformation in solution when ATP binds to protein, and that this conformational change exerted by the protein should be the trigger for the cleavage of the γ phosphate group.

Finding a conformation of the bound ligand is a big issue in protein-ligand docking problem18,19,20. The widely used methods introduced MD to search for the conformation of the ligand placed close to the protein. The current study implies that, in the case of ATP molecule, protein bound conformation can hardly be achieved by simple MD simulation, as shown that flatness of the ring structures and the χ and γ torsion angles for protein-bound ATP rarely appears in solution. Therefore, a sophisticated MD simulation that includes both a ligand and a protein at once is, at least, necessary to sample the conformations for protein-ligand complex. In addition, the failure in finding the appropriate conformation in MD simulation can be circumvented by a database search (database sampling), in case the protein-ligand conformations are abundant in the database.

Supplementary Materials

9_1_sup.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

K.Y. was supported by Targeted Proteins Research Program (TPRP) and by Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.

References

  • 1.Senez JC. Some considerations on the energetics of bacterial growth. Bacteriol Rev. 1962;26:95–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kitamura K, Tokunaga M, Esaki S, Hikikoshi-Iwane A, Yanagida T. Mechanism of muscle contraction based on stochastic properties of single actomyosin motors observed in vitro. BIOPHYSICS. 2005;1:1–19. doi: 10.2142/biophysics.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arnez JG, Moras D. Structural and functional considerations of the aminoacylation reaction. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22:211–216. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tarrant MK, Cole PA. The chemical biology of protein phosphorylation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:797–825. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.070907.103047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schulman BA, Harper JW. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: the apex for downstream signalling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:319–331. doi: 10.1038/nrm2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bauer CB, Fonseca MV, Holden HM, Thoden JB, Thompson TB, Escalante-Semerena JC, Rayment I. Three-Dimensional Structure of ATP:corrinoid adenosyltransferase from Salmonella typhimurium in its free state, complexed with MgATP, or complexed with hydroxycobalamin and MgATP. Biochemistry. 2001;40:361–374. doi: 10.1021/bi002145o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berman HM, Henrick K, Nakamura H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10:980. doi: 10.1038/nsb1203-980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamaguchi A, Iida K, Matsui N, Tomoda S, Yura K, Go M. Het-PDB Navi.: A database for protein-small molecule interactions. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 2004;135:79–84. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvh009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shrake A, Rupley JA. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J Mol Biol. 1973;79:351–364. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kitamura Y, Ebihara A, Agari Y, Shinkai A, Hirotsu K, Kuramitsu S. Structure of D-alanine-D-alanine ligase from Thermus thermophilus HB8: cumulative conformational change and enzyme-ligand interactions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009;65:1098–1106. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909029710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2008;4:435–447. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schlick T. Molecular Modeling and Simulation: An Interdisciplinary Guide. 2nd Edition. Springer; New York: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hyde ST, Ninham BW, Zemb T. Phase boundary for ternary microemulsions. Predictions of a Geometric Model. J Phys Chem. 1989;93:1464–1471. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hyde ST, Barnes IS, Ninham BW. Curvature energy of surfactant interfaces confined to the plaquettes of a cubic lattice. Langmuir. 1990;6:1055–1062. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The UniProt Consortium Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D214–D219. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mildvan AS. Mechanisms of signaling and related enzymes. PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics. 1997;29:401–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol. 1997;267:727–748. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang S-Y, Zou X. Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:3016–3034. doi: 10.3390/ijms11083016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kokubo H, Tanaka T, Okamura Y. Ab initio prediction of protein-ligand binding structures by replica-exchange umbrella sampling simulations. J Comp Chem. 2011;32:2810–2821. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.R Development Core Team . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2011. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

9_1_sup.pdf (2.9MB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysics are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society of Japan

RESOURCES