Abstract
In response to the recommended vaccines in older-aged individuals, sex differences occur in response to those that protect against influenza, tetanus, pertussis, shingles, and pneumococcal infections. The efficacy of vaccines recommended for older-aged adults is consistently greater for females than for males. Gender differences as well as biological sex differences can influence vaccine uptake, responses, and outcome in older-aged individuals, which should influence guidelines, formulations, and dosage recommendations for vaccines in the elderly.
In the United States, as well as in most developed countries in the world, the population is aging, largely due to the “baby boomers” who began turning 65 in 2011. Based on data analyses from the U.S. Census Bureau, the projections for 2050 are that the population of people over the age of 65 will almost double the 2012 estimated population of 43.1 million (85). With growth in the population of older-aged individuals comes public health concerns about the care and treatment for chronic as well as acute diseases, including infectious diseases. In developed countries, women tend to outlive men (41a, 72). Although sex and gender differences in mortality rates among individuals 65 years and older are well documented, the extent to which the sexes differ in response to diseases that either are specific to older age or worsen with age has not been adequately considered. The risk of severe outcome from infectious diseases, in particular, becomes greater for older-aged individuals in developed countries (FIGURE 1), with vaccines serving as a primary prophylactic treatment, when available. In this review, we will show that sex (i.e., biological differences) and gender (i.e., social and cultural norms) affect the responses to and outcome of recommended vaccines in older-aged individuals (i.e., 65 years and older). We will further demonstrate that male-female differences in the responses to vaccines alter the efficacy of vaccines for protecting aging individuals equally. Consideration will be given to specific vaccines and possible biological mechanisms that could differentially influence vaccine uptake, response, and outcome in older-aged males and females.
FIGURE 1.
Among adults, susceptibility to infection increases with older age
For infectious diseases in which vaccines are available, vaccines are the primary prophylactic treatment for the prevention of disease. Antibody responses as well as the efficacy of vaccines decrease with older age and to a greater extent among males than females. In addition to immunological changes that occur with older age, endocrinological changes occur in both males and females, in which both estrogen and testosterone levels decline, which may contribute to increased susceptibility to infections and reduced efficacy of vaccines in older-aged individuals.
Aging of the Immune System
With age, there is a progressive functional decline in the immune system (17) that is assumed to occur equally in males and females. One of the most well characterized attributes of an aging immune system is an aberrant chronic low-grade pro-inflammatory state (16), which may occur to a greater extent in females than in males (40). The activity of innate immune cells that are associated with inflammation, including dendritic cell (DC) subsets, macrophages, and neutrophils, also becomes dysregulated with age (2, 15, 60, 112). While inflammatory responses are necessary to orchestrate responses that clear pathogens and repair tissues, dysregulation or chronicity of inflammatory responses can contribute to tissue damage and disease.
Data from animal models as well as humans further show that aging is associated with dysregulated T-cell function, including reduced clonal diversity of naive CD4+ T cells (79), increased frequency of central memory T cells, reduced frequency of effector memory CD4+ T cells (62), reduced clonal diversity of CD8+ T cells (76), and increased frequency of effector memory and effector CD8+ T cells (56). Aging is also associated with changes in B-cell function. Older-aged individuals have decreased clonal diversity of B cells and antibody production compared with younger-aged individuals (44, 97). These immunological changes provide partial basis for the distinct vaccine recommendations for the aged population. The current U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommended vaccinations for individuals 60 years and older include 1) the annual trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine at high dose; 2) the zoster vaccine; 3) a booster of the pneumococcal vaccine; and 4) a booster of the tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccines. Other vaccines may be recommended depending on childhood vaccination history and risk of exposure (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/adults/rec-vac/).
Sex Differences in Immune Function
There exists a growing body of literature illustrating that both innate and adaptive immune responses differ between the sexes following exposure to immunological stimuli, but this is currently not considered in the design or dosing of recommended vaccinations at any age. In both humans and preclinical animal models, most studies typically utilize young adults, with little to no consideration of whether sex differences in immune function change over the course of life. Innate immune responses differ between the sexes, at least among young adults. Studies conducted using young adult mice illustrated that the activity of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), production of inflammatory proteins (e.g., IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α), antigen presentation, and phagocytic capacity of macrophages is reportedly higher in females than in males in response to diverse antigens and pathogens (9, 26, 38, 77, 90, 103, 111). Whether these innate immune system differences between the sexes are still present in aged individuals has not been adequately addressed, but some data suggest that elevated production of inflammatory proteins in females compared with males persists among aged individuals (40).
Females also exhibit elevated humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to antigenic stimulation, vaccination, and infection than do males (38). Both basal levels of immunoglobulin (Ig) (14) as well as antibody responses to viruses and vaccines are consistently higher in females than in males among both young and aged individuals (23, 65, 66). Men also reportedly have lower absolute CD3+ T-cell counts, absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells, CD4+-to-CD8+ T-cell ratios, and helper T-cell type 1 (Th1) responses (3, 27, 108, 115). Among older individuals, there are limited data indicating that reductions in adaptive immune responses with age, including numbers of T and B cells and cytokine production, are more dramatic in males than in females (51).
Vaccine Design Should Consider Both Sex and Age
Vaccination Rates are not Consistently Analyzed for Male-Female Differences Among Aged Individuals
Although some vaccines are widely distributed in the elderly population, the uptake of others is much less common. In the U.S., the seasonal influenza vaccine is routinely offered to persons 65 years of age and older, and 61% of this population is vaccinated, which is almost double the vaccination rate among young adults (20, 34, 115a). Similarly, the vaccination rate for the pneumococcal vaccine is higher in the aged population (59.7%) compared with young adults (18.5%), whereas the rates of vaccination for the tetanus vaccine are similar between the aged and young adult populations at 53.4% and 64%, respectively (19). Although the elderly have a higher uptake of both the seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, neither meets the target vaccination coverage rate of 90% in the U.S. (29a).
Sex-specific differences in the rate of vaccination for distinct vaccines have been reported in the elderly (Table 1). It is widely documented both in the U.S. and in several European countries that rates of vaccination for both the seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines are greater for elderly males than for their female counterparts (4, 8, 21, 33, 35, 40, 59, 98, 106). In contrast, receipt of both the herpes zoster and pneumococcal vaccines tends to be higher among females than males (54, 70). To date, there are no studies that partition and analyze tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) or tetanus and diphtheria (Td) vaccination rates by sex.
Table 1.
Sex differences in vaccination for the elderly
| Influenza |
Tetanus-Diphtheria-Pertussis |
Pneumococcal |
Herpes Zoster |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal | Pandemic H1N1 | Td/Tdap | PPSV23/PCV13 | HZV | |
| Recommended schedule | 1 dose/year | 1 dose Tdap + Td booster/10 yr | 1 dose 65+ | 1 dose 65+ | |
| Vaccination rate | M > F | M > F | M = F | M = F | F > M |
| Adverse reactions | F > M | F > M | F > M | F > M | F > M |
| Antibody response | F > M | F > M | M ≥ F | M > F | NA |
| Efficacy | F > M | F > M | NA | F > M | F > M |
| References | 10, 11, 21–23, 25, 32, 35–37, 39, 40, 49, 57, 58, 63, 64, 81–83, 105–107, 109 | 7, 42, 52, 74, 104, 113 | 12, 24, 47, 95, 96, 101, 102, 114 | 54, 55 | |
Td, tetanus and diphtheria; Tdap, tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis; PPSV23, pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine against 23 types of pneumococcal bacteria; PCV13, pneumococcal conjugated vaccine against 13 types of pneumococcal bacteria; HZV, herpes zoster vaccine; F, females; M, males; NA, not available.
Multiple factors play a role in the acceptance of vaccines by aged individuals, including gender-associated differences in beliefs and general knowledge regarding vaccination (33). Females report more adverse reactions to vaccination and have more concerns regarding vaccine safety and efficacy than males, which may contribute to the observed differences in the uptake of influenza vaccines among aged males and females (33, 40). In other cases, a lack of public awareness about the availability and benefits of vaccines (e.g., the pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccines) or a lack of partitioning and analysis of epidemiological data for sex differences (e.g., Tdap and Td) may result in a misconception that the receipt of vaccines is equivalent for males and females among aged individuals.
Adverse Reactions to Vaccines are Greater in Aged Females Than in Males
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vaccines may elicit mild to moderate adverse reactions that include both local and systemic reactions. Aged females consistently report more adverse reactions than males in response to the seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines (10, 22, 25, 32, 36, 49, 57, 58, 82), the pneumococcal vaccines (24, 101), the herpes zoster vaccine (55), and the tetanus and pertussis vaccines (7, 42, 113). While both males and females experience similar types of adverse reactions, the proportion of female vaccinees reporting local reactions, such as injection site pain, redness, and swelling, as well as systemic reactions, including joint or muscle pain, headache, back and abdominal pain, fever, chills, and hypersensitivity reactions is consistently greater than for males (Table 1). Whether differences in adverse reactions among aged males and females reflect a gender-based reporting bias or a sex difference in inflammation has not been resolved. Data on adverse reactions to vaccines are typically collected through the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which relies on passive reporting of adverse reactions. Thus females may be more likely to report adverse reactions to VAERS than males. Limited analyses of local erythema and induration, which are measures of inflammation, at the site of seasonal influenza vaccination illustrate that aged females have significantly larger (≥6 mm) injection site reactions to the vaccine than their male counterparts (18). Future studies must continue to develop methods for accurate assessment of the qualitative as well as the quantitative reactions to vaccines to better understand whether differences in adverse reactions to vaccines reflect a sex, gender, or both form of biases. Furthermore, the impact of dose and route of administration on reducing adverse reactions in females has not been documented.
Antibody Responses to Vaccines Differ Between the Sexes Among Aged Individuals
Most vaccines provide protection through the induction of antibodies, which has historically been used as a relative correlate of protection (91, 92). The magnitude of the antibody response to vaccines depends on many factors, including the age and sex of the vaccinee. In general, antibody responses are lower in aged males and females compared with their younger adult counterparts (FIGURE 1) (29, 53, 94). In some cases, this has resulted in reformulation of vaccines, such as the development of the high-dose influenza vaccine for annual vaccination of individuals 65 years and older, regardless of sex.
Sex differences in the antibody response depend on the specific vaccine (Table 1). Aged females consistently have higher antibody responses to influenza vaccines than males (11, 23, 37, 40, 63, 64, 105). As noted above, the high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine was introduced to overcome the overall lower antibody production in aged compared with young adults. Sex differences in hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers to either the standard-dose or high-dose influenza vaccine are apparent, in which antibody responses are significantly higher in older females than in males against each of the three influenza strains (H1N1, H3N2, and Influenza B) (37). Similar to the seasonal influenza vaccines, older females were reported to have higher HAI antibody titers against the monovalent pandemic 2009 H1N1 (pH1N1) inactivated vaccine than males, resulting in a two to three times higher seroprotection and seroconversion rate in females than in males (63). Although older females produced higher antibody responses to the pH1N1 vaccine, the avidity of their antibodies after pH1N1 vaccination was significantly lower than that of older males (64). If higher avidity is a measure of a superior antibody response in the elderly, then these data suggest that the quality of the antibody response might be better for males than for females. If females have lower antibody avidity than males, then this may suggest that cross-reactivity of antibody to novel strains of influenza is higher for aged females than males, which has been demonstrated in a murine model of heterosubtypic influenza challenge (71).
In contrast to influenza vaccines, aged males have higher antibody responses to both the pneumococcal vaccine and the Td/Tdap vaccines than females (7, 12, 24, 42, 47, 52, 74, 95, 96, 104, 113). In a study evaluating the immunogenicity of the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in nursing home residents, both pre- and post-vaccination IgG titers against all four serotypes analyzed were higher in males than in females (12). In a similar study, when aged individuals were administered the 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine, males were found to have consistently higher levels of serotype-specific IgG both pre- and post-vaccination. Antibody concentrations were 19% higher in males than in females 6 wk after the first dose, and 30% higher 6 wk after the second dose (47). Few studies have analyzed antibody response to Tdap vaccines for sex-specific differences. The available studies suggest that, although there are varying trends depending on the vaccine antigen and study population, males tend to have higher antibody titers to both tetanus and diphtheria than females (42, 52, 74, 104). This is in contrast to what has been reported for younger adults, in which females consistently have higher antibody titers than males in response to live attenuated, subunit, and inactivated vaccines, including the pneumococcal, influenza, yellow fever, rubella, measles, mumps, hepatitis A and B, herpes simplex 2, rabies, smallpox, and dengue vaccines (66, 99).
The lack of consistently higher antibody responses among aged females compared with males may be caused by both biological and social differences between the sexes. The dose of a vaccine may also contribute to the difference in antibody response, since high doses of a vaccine could potentially mask or reverse sex-specific differences in the immune response. Historically, if aged males ever served in the military, then they will likely have higher rates of immunization than females who were not in the military (42, 45). Similarly, females of child-bearing age have only been able to participate in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials since 1977, which may also explain the bias for a higher number of men willing to participate in vaccine trials (100). Data from influenza vaccines are a notable exception because these vaccines are administered annually and, therefore, present the largest body of literature from which to analyze sex- and age-based differences in the correlates of vaccine protection.
Vaccine Efficacy is Greater for Aged Females Than for Males
Vaccine efficacy refers to the percent reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated population under ideal conditions (110). Efficacy is measured in randomized, controlled clinical trials where there is active monitoring of disease, vaccination status, and lab confirmation of the infection. In addition, efficacy studies often include monitoring hospitalization, medical visits, and mortality (110). Vaccine efficacy is often misinterpreted as vaccine effectiveness, which refers to the ability of a vaccine to prevent disease in a population-wide, real-world setting.
Following receipt of influenza vaccines, vaccine efficacy is typically measured by hospitalization and mortality rates post-vaccination. Most studies of influenza vaccine efficacy, however, do not disaggregate data by sex. Among older community-dwelling adults in Taiwan that received the standard seasonal influenza vaccine, higher HAI titers were associated with lower rates of hospitalization and mortality in females than males in logistic regression models, suggesting that the efficacy of the influenza vaccine in older adults might be higher for females (109). Vaccine effectiveness, as measured as all-cause mortality, was also measured in a large study of community-dwelling elderly in Spain and was higher in seasonal influenza-vaccinated aged females than males (107). During the 1989-1990 influenza epidemic in England, a review of over 10,000 elderly patient records revealed that vaccination was better at preventing mortality in aged females than males (39). Finally, several large studies have been conducted that include elderly patients across the U.S. and that span over multiple influenza seasons where the vaccine effectiveness at reducing mortality is consistently higher among females than males (81, 83).
Unlike the influenza vaccines, sex differences in vaccine efficacy in the elderly have only been measured in a modest number of studies for the herpes zoster and pneumococcal vaccines, and not at all for the Td/Tdap vaccines. In a retrospective study examining the hospitalization rate among vaccinated individuals between 2005 and 2009 in Germany, the proportion of hospitalizations due to herpes zoster infection was higher in males compared with females (55). Another large study examined all deaths registered on U.S. death certificates reporting any pneumococcal infection from 1968 to 2006. Data obtained from this study indicated that, following the introduction of the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in 1983, there was a significant reduction in mortality, especially in white females over the age of 65 (102). Another study examined the effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine at preventing Streptococcus pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia (SpCAP) in the elderly and showed that there were significantly fewer females who were hospitalized with confirmed cases of SpCAP than males (data extracted from both the U.S. and Europe) (114). Overall, vaccine efficacy tends to be higher in elderly females than in males (Table 1), although the measurement of efficacy and effectiveness for each vaccine can be different. Increased analysis and reporting of sex differences in vaccine efficacy as well as defining the absolute correlates of protection and determining whether these measures of protection differ between the sexes is required for future studies.
Biological Mechanisms Mediating Sex Differences in Vaccine Efficacy in the Elderly
Sex Steroids
The prevailing hypothesis for immunological differences between the sexes is that sex steroids, particularly testosterone, estradiol, and progesterone, influence the functioning of immune cells. Sex steroids alter the functioning of immune cells by binding to specific receptors, which are expressed in various lymphoid tissue cells as well as in circulating lymphocytes, macrophages, and DCs (68). The binding of sex steroids to their respective steroid receptors directly influences cell signaling pathways, including NF-κB, cJun, and IRF1, resulting in differential production of cytokines and chemokines (75, 88).
With age, the hormonal milieu dramatically changes as ovarian function in females and testicular production of sex steroids in males decline (FIGURE 1) (5, 80, 87). The hormonal changes associated with menopause in females are dramatic and relatively abrupt, since ovarian production of estradiol declines and progesterone production is reduced to that which is synthesized by the adrenal glands. In males, the reduction in testosterone production is more gradual. The reduction in sex steroid concentrations and sex steroid receptor signaling with age likely contributes to age-associated dysregulation of immune function (FIGURE 1) (45). This has been directly studied in females pre- and postmenopause, with menopause (either naturally occurring or surgically induced) resulting in lower numbers of B and T cells and greater concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) (46, 61, 69). Use of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal females affects immune function by increasing circulating numbers of B cells and reducing baseline concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines compared with postmenopausal females not on hormone replacement therapy (28, 61). Whether testosterone replacement therapy affects immune responses in aged males has not been determined. Also, whether treatment with hormone replacement therapies affects the outcome of vaccines in either females or males has not been reported.
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation
In addition to hormonal influences, genetic and epigenetic factors contribute to sex-based differences in an immune response to vaccination (67). Sex-based differences in responses to vaccines are observed before puberty, during reproductive years, and after reproductive senescence, suggesting a role for factors other than sex steroids. A large number of immune-related genes encoding proteins are located on the X chromosome (38). A number of critical transcriptional and translational control effectors that function downstream of activated cytokine receptors are also encoded on the X chromosome. Given that males are XY and females are XX, any damaging mutations or polymorphisms to X-linked genes are more likely to have an immune consequence in males compared with females (1). The combined effects of hormones influencing the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, and gene composition on the X chromosome potentially differing between XX females and XY males, might determine an immune response to vaccination (67).
The expression of X-linked genes may be affected by X-linked micro-RNAs (miRNAs), which are small noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression at a posttranscriptional level and play a role in maintaining immunological homeostasis (89). There are disproportionately more miRNAs located on the X chromosome than on any autosomal chromosome (89). The X chromosome contains 10% of the ∼800 miRNAs in the genome, whereas the Y chromosome contains only 2 miRNAs (43). Lastly, polymorphisms in sex chromosomal and autosomal genes that encode for immunological proteins can contribute to sex differences in immune responses (93) and antibody responses to vaccination (48).
Microbiome
The human microbiota is composed of microbial communities in different habitats, including skin, gut, oral cavity, and genitals, which can vary according to sex and age. For example, age-related vaginal changes that occur pre- and postmenopause can affect the vaginal microbiome (13). Bacteria can metabolize inactive sex hormones into their bioactive state, mediated by hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzymes (41). Antibiotic use can deplete bacterial populations, impairing this bacteria-regulated hormone metabolism and decreasing the availability of active, circulating sex hormones and, thus, alter the immune response to vaccines. Accumulating evidence indicates that hormonal status can shape gut microbiome composition such that the onset of puberty and concomitant hormone-specific changes result in sex-specific microbiome profiles (116). Recent studies utilizing prepubertal and young adult mice illustrate that immune function and spontaneous development of autoimmune diseases, including Type 1 diabetes, is mediated by sex-specific composition of the gut microbiome and the hormonal milieu (73, 117). Consequently, microbiome composition can directly influence immune function in a sex-specific manner, but how this changes with age requires consideration.
Chronic Infection
There is growing interest in how latent infections impact the outcome of vaccination. Cytomegalovirus (CMV), in particular, is a β-herpes virus that infects most of the population in childhood and remains in a latent, primarily quiescent state for our lifetime. In healthy individuals, CMV latency only causes a chronic, asymptomatic infection with low levels of intermittent virus shedding. In young adults (humans and mice), CMV infection is associated with elevated antibody responses to influenza vaccines (40). In aged individuals, CMV seropositivity is associated with chronic inflammation (6) and lower antibody responses to influenza vaccines (30, 31). Whether the impact of CMV on immunocompetence in aged individuals is sex-dependent has not been reported. Incidence of CMV infection (based on seropositivity) is reportedly higher in young females than in males (50), suggesting that, in aged individuals, the impact of CMV on immunological aging and responses to vaccination may be greater for females than for males.
Conclusions and Future Directions
Males and females are biologically and in some cases socially and culturally different, which can impact acceptance of and responses to vaccines in aged individuals. The social or culture differences between males and females appear to impact knowledge about the value of vaccines as well as receipt of vaccines in the elderly. The biological differences, spanning hormones and genes to the microbiome and past exposures to infections, may differentially influence immune responses to vaccines in males and females. As a result of the biological differences between males and females, “precision vaccines” should be developed that consider how sex influences the outcome of vaccination. For example, increasing the breadth and magnitude of the immune response to vaccines in aged males might be a productive mechanism for increasing vaccine efficacy in males. In contrast, vaccination strategies for aged females should be focused on reducing inflammation and adverse reactions while retaining elevated antibody responses and vaccine efficacy. The concept of sex-specific dosage recommendations has been more readily applied to drugs than to biologics, such as vaccines. This review highlights a need to better consider how vaccine efficacy and acceptance could be improved by considering sex as a variable in vaccine trials in aged populations.
Acknowledgments
We thank the members of the Klein lab for reviewing drafts of this manuscript.
Footnotes
This work was partially funded by an National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Influenza Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract (BAA-NIAID-DMID-NIHAI2012154).
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).
Author contributions: A.F. prepared figures; A.F. and S.K. drafted manuscript; A.F. and S.K. edited and revised manuscript; A.F. and S.K. approved final version of manuscript; S.K. conception and design of research.
References
- 1.Abramowitz LK, Olivier-Van Stichelen S, Hanover JA. Chromosome imbalance as a driver of sex disparity in disease. J Genomics 2: 77–88, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Agrawal A, Tay J, Ton S, Agrawal S, Gupta S. Increased reactivity of dendritic cells from aged subjects to self-antigen, the human DNA. J Immunol 182: 1138–1145, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Amadori A, Zamarchi R, De Silvestro G, Forza G, Cavatton G, Danieli GA, Clementi M, Chieco-Bianchi L. Genetic control of the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio in humans. Nat Med 1: 1279–1283, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Annunziata K, Rak A, Del Buono H, DiBonaventura M, Krishnarajah G. Vaccination rates among the general adult population and high-risk groups in the United States. PLos One 7: e50553, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bain J. Testosterone and the aging male: to treat or not to treat? Maturitas 66: 16–22, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bauer ME, Wieck A, Petersen LE, Baptista TS. Neuroendocrine and viral correlates of premature immunosenescence. Ann NY Acad Sci 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Bayas J, Vilella A, Bertran M, Vidal J, Batalla J, Asenjo M, Salleras L. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the adult tetanus-diphtheria vaccine. How many doses are necessary? Epidemiol Infect 127: 451–460, 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bean-Mayberry B, Yano EM, Mor MK, Bayliss NK, Xu X, Fine MJ. Does sex influence immunization status for influenza and pneumonia in older veterans? J Am Geriatr Soc 57: 1427–1432, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berghofer B, Frommer T, Haley G, Fink L, Bein G, Hackstein H. TLR7 ligands induce higher IFN-alpha production in females. J Immunol 177: 2088–2096, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Beyer WP, Palache A, Kerstens R, Masurel N. Gender differences in local and systemic reactions to inactivated influenza vaccine, established by a meta-analysis of fourteen independent studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 15: 65–70, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Booy R, Khandaker G, Heron LG, Yin J, Doyle B, Tudo KK, Hueston L, Gilbert GL, Raina MacIntyre C, Dwyer DE. Cross-reacting antibodies against the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus in older Australians. Med J Aust 194: 19, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brandão AP, De Oliveira TC, de Cunto Brandileone MC, Gonçalves JE, Yara TI, Simonsen V. Persistence of antibody response to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides in vaccinated long term-care residents in Brazil. Vaccine 23: 762–768, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brotman RM, Shardell MD, Gajer P, Fadrosh D, Chang K, Silver MI, Viscidi RP, Burke AE, Ravel J, Gravitt PE. Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 21: 450–458, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Butterworth M, McClellan B, Allansmith M. Influence of sex in immunoglobulin levels. Nature 214: 1224–1225, 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Canan CH, Gokhale NS, Carruthers B, Lafuse WP, Schlesinger LS, Torrelles JB, Turner J. Characterization of lung inflammation and its impact on macrophage function in aging. J Leukoc Biol 96: 473–480, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cannizzo ES, Clement CC, Sahu R, Follo C, Santambrogio L. Oxidative stress, inflamm-aging and immunosenescence. J Proteomics 74: 2313–2323, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Castelo-Branco C, Soveral I. The immune system and aging: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol 30: 16–22, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cate TR, Couch RB, Parker D, Baxter B. Reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and antibody persistence in adults given inactivated influenza virus vaccines: 1978. Rev Infect Dis 5: 737–747, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult vaccination coverage: United States, 2010 MMWR. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61: 66–72, 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National early season flu vaccination coverage, United States, November 2013 [Online]. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/nifs-estimates-nov2013.htm. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chor JS, Ngai KL, Goggins WB, Wong MC, Wong SY, Lee N, Leung TF, Rainer TH, Griffiths S, Chan PK. Willingness of Hong Kong healthcare workers to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination at different WHO alert levels: two questionnaire surveys. Br Med J 339: b3391, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cook IF. Sex differences in injection site reactions with human vaccines. Human Vaccines 5: 441–449, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cook IF. Sexual dimorphism of humoral immunity with human vaccines. Vaccine 26: 3551–3555, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cook IF, Pond D, Hartel G. Comparative reactogenicity and immunogenicity of 23 valent pneumococcal vaccine administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in elderly adults. Vaccine 25: 4767–4774, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Couch RB, Winokur P, Brady R, Belshe R, Chen WH, Cate TR, Sigurdardottir B, Hoeper A, Graham IL, Edelman R. Safety and immunogenicity of a high dosage trivalent influenza vaccine among elderly subjects. Vaccine 25: 7656–7663, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Da Silva JA. Sex hormones, glucocorticoids and autoimmunity: facts and hypotheses. Ann Rheum Dis 54: 6–16, 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Das BR, Bhanushali AA, Khadapkar R, Jeswani KD, Bhavsar M, Dasgupta A. Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets in adults from western India: influence of sex, age and method of enumeration. Indian J Med Sci 62: 397–406, 2008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Deguchi K, Kamada M, Irahara M, Maegawa M, Yamamoto S, Ohmoto Y, Murata K, Yasui T, Yamano S, Aono T. Postmenopausal changes in production of type 1 and type 2 cytokines and the effects of hormone replacement therapy. Menopause 8: 266–273, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Del Giudice G, Weinberger B, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. Vaccines for the elderly. Gerontology 61: 203–210, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29a.Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Derhovanessian E, Maier AB, Hahnel K, McElhaney JE, Slagboom EP, Pawelec G. Latent infection with cytomegalovirus is associated with poor memory CD4 responses to influenza A core proteins in the elderly. J Immunol 193: 3624–3631, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Derhovanessian E, Theeten H, Hahnel K, Van Damme P, Cools N, Pawelec G. Cytomegalovirus-associated accumulation of late-differentiated CD4 T-cells correlates with poor humoral response to influenza vaccination. Vaccine 31: 685–690, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Donalisio MR, Ramalheira RM, Cordeiro R. Eventos adversos após vacinação contra influenza em idosos, Distrito de Campinas, SP, 2000. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36: 467–471, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eilers R, Krabbe P, de Melker H. Factors affecting the uptake of vaccination by the elderly in Western society. Preventive Med 69: 224–234, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eilers R, Krabbe PF, van Essen TG, Suijkerbuijk A, van Lier A, de Melker HE. Assessment of vaccine candidates for persons aged 50 and older: a review. BMC Geriatr 13: 32, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Endrich MM, Blank PR, Szucs TD. Influenza vaccination uptake and socioeconomic determinants in 11 European countries. Vaccine 27: 4018–4024, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Engler RJ, Nelson MR, Klote MM, VanRaden MJ, Huang CY, Cox NJ, Klimov A, Keitel WA, Nichol KL, Carr WW. Half-vs. full-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (2004–2005): age, dose, and sex effects on immune responses. Arch Intern Med 168: 2405–2414, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Falsey AR, Treanor JJ, Tornieporth N, Capellan J, Gorse GJ. Randomized, double-blind controlled phase 3 trial comparing the immunogenicity of high-dose and standard-dose influenza vaccine in adults 65 years of age and older. J Infect Dis 200: 172–180, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fish EN. The X-files in immunity: sex-based differences predispose immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 737–744, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fleming D, Watson J, Nicholas S, Smith G, Swan A. Study of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the elderly in the epidemic of 1989–90 using a general practice database. Epidemiol Infect 115: 581–589, 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Furman D, Hejblum BP, Simon N, Jojic V, Dekker CL, Thiebaut R, Tibshirani RJ, Davis MM. Systems analysis of sex differences reveals an immunosuppressive role for testosterone in the response to influenza vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 869–874, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garcia-Gomez E, Gonzalez-Pedrajo B, Camacho-Arroyo I. Role of sex steroid hormones in bacterial-host interactions. Biomed Res Intl 2013: 928290, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41a.GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385: 117–171, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gergen PJ, McQuillan GM, Kiely M, Ezzati-Rice TM, Sutter RW, Virella G. A population-based serologic survey of immunity to tetanus in the United States. N Engl J Med 332: 761–767, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ghorai A, Ghosh U. miRNA gene counts in chromosomes vary widely in a species and biogenesis of miRNA largely depends on transcription or post-transcriptional processing of coding genes. Front Genetics 5: 100, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gibson KL, Wu YC, Barnett Y, Duggan O, Vaughan R, Kondeatis E, Nilsson BO, Wikby A, Kipling D, Dunn-Walters DK. B-cell diversity decreases in old age and is correlated with poor health status. Aging Cell 8: 18–25, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Giefing-Kröll C, Berger P, Lepperdinger G, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. How sex and age affect immune responses, susceptibility to infections, and response to vaccination. Aging Cell 14: 309–321, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Giglio T, Imro MA, Filaci G, Scudeletti M, Puppo F, De Cecco L, Indiveri F, Costantini S. Immune cell circulating subsets are affected by gonadal function. Life Sci 54: 1305–1312, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Goldblatt D, Southern J, Andrews N, Ashton L, Burbidge P, Woodgate S, Pebody R, Miller E. The immunogenicity of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine versus 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine in adults aged 50–80 years. Clin Infectious Dis 49: 1318–1325, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gordeeva LA, Shabaldin AV, Semenova EM, Glushkov AN. [Influence of genetic and phenotypical factors on the efficiency of the vaccination of young children against diphtheria and measles]. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol: 42–46, 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Govaert T, Dinant G, Aretz K, Masurel N, Sprenger M, Knottnerus J. Adverse reactions to influenza vaccine in elderly people: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ 307: 988–990, 1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Green MS, Cohen D, Slepon R, Robin G, Wiener M. Ethnic and gender differences in the prevalence of anti-cytomegalovirus antibodies among young adults in Israel. Int J Epidemiol 22: 720–723, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gubbels Bupp MR. Sex, the aging immune system, and chronic disease. Cell Immunol 294: 102–110, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hainz U, Jenewein B, Asch E, Pfeiffer KP, Berger P, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. Insufficient protection for healthy elderly adults by tetanus and TBE vaccines. Vaccine 23: 3232–3235, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Haq K, McElhaney JE. Immunosenescence: influenza vaccination and the elderly. Curr Opin Immunol 29: 38–42, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hechter RC, Tartof SY, Jacobsen SJ, Smith N, Tseng HF. Trends and disparity in zoster vaccine uptake in a managed care population. Vaccine 31: 4564–4568, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hillebrand K, Bricout H, Schulze-Rath R, Schink T, Garbe E. Incidence of herpes zoster and its complications in Germany, 2005–2009. J Infect 70: 178–186, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hong MS, Dan JM, Choi JY, Kang I. Age-associated changes in the frequency of naive, memory and effector CD8+ T cells. Mech Ageing Dev 125: 615–618, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Honkanen PO, Keistinen T, Kivelä SL. Reactions following administration of influenza vaccine alone or with pneumococcal vaccine to the elderly. Arch Intern Med 156: 205–208, 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jackson LA, Austin G, Chen RT, Stout R, DeStefano F, Gorse GJ, Newman FK, Yu O, Weniger BG, Group VSDS. Safety and immunogenicity of varying dosages of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered by needle-free jet injectors. Vaccine 19: 4703–4709, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jimenez-Garcia R, Hernandez-Barrera V, de Andres AL, Jimenez-Trujillo I, Esteban-Hernandez J, Carrasco-Garrido P. Gender influence in influenza vaccine uptake in Spain: time trends analysis (1995–2006). Vaccine 28: 6169–6175, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jing Y, Shaheen E, Drake RR, Chen N, Gravenstein S, Deng Y. Aging is associated with a numerical and functional decline in plasmacytoid dendritic cells, whereas myeloid dendritic cells are relatively unaltered in human peripheral blood. Hum Immunol 70: 777–784, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kamada M, Irahara M, Maegawa M, Yasui T, Yamano S, Yamada M, Tezuka M, Kasai Y, Deguchi K, Ohmoto Y, Aono T. B cell subsets in postmenopausal women and the effect of hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 37: 173–179, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kang I, Hong MS, Nolasco H, Park SH, Dan JM, Choi JY, Craft J. Age-associated change in the frequency of memory CD4+ T cells impairs long term CD4+ T cell responses to influenza vaccine. J Immunol 173: 673–681, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kao TM, Hsieh SM, Kung HC, Lee YC, Huang KC, Huang LM, Chang FY, Wang NC, Liu YC, Lee WS, Liu HE, Chen CI, Chen CH. Immune response of single dose vaccination against 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in the Taiwanese elderly. Vaccine 28: 6159–6163, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Khurana S, Verma N, Talaat KR, Karron RA, Golding H. Immune response following H1N1pdm09 vaccination: differences in antibody repertoire and avidity in young adults and elderly populations stratified by age and gender. J Infect Dis 205: 610–620, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Klein SL, Huber S. Sex differences in susceptibility to viral infection. In: Sex Hormones and Immunity to Infection, edited by Klein SL, Roberts CW. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009, p. 93–122. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Klein SL, Jedlicka A, Pekosz A. The Xs and Y of immune responses to viral vaccines. Lancet Infect Dis 10: 338–349, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Klein SL, Marriott I, Fish EN. Sex-based differences in immune function and responses to vaccination. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 109: 9–15, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kovats S, Carreras E, Agrawal H. Sex steroid receptors in immune cells. In: Sex Hormones and Immunity to Infection, edited by Klein SL, Roberts CW. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010, p. 53–92. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kumru S, Godekmerdan A, Yilmaz B. Immune effects of surgical menopause and estrogen replacement therapy in peri-menopausal women. J Reprod Immunol 63: 31–38, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu B, Heywood AE, Reekie J, Banks E, Kaldor JM, Mc IP, Newall AT, Macintyre CR. Risk factors for herpes zoster in a large cohort of unvaccinated older adults: a prospective cohort study. Epidemiol Infect 143: 2871–2881, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lorenzo ME, Hodgson A, Robinson DP, Kaplan JB, Pekosz A, Klein SL. Antibody responses and cross protection against lethal influenza A viruses differ between the sexes in C57BL/6 mice. Vaccine 29: 9246–9255, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Barker-Collo S, Bartels DH, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bhalla K, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Boufous S, Bucello C, Burch M, Burney P, Carapetis J, Chen H, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahodwala N, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ezzati M, Feigin V, Flaxman AD, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gonzalez-Medina D, Halasa YA, Haring D, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Hoen B, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Keren A, Khoo JP, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Ohno SL, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Mallinger L, March L, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGrath J, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Michaud C, Miller M, Miller TR, Mock C, Mocumbi AO, Mokdad AA, Moran A, Mulholland K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nasseri K, Norman P, O'Donnell M, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Phillips D, Pierce K, Pope CA, Porrini E 3rd, Pourmalek F, Raju M, Ranganathan D, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Rivara FP, Roberts T, De Leon FR, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Salomon JA, Sampson U, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Segui-Gomez M, Shepard DS, Singh D, Singleton J, Sliwa K, Smith E, Steer A, Taylor JA, Thomas B, Tleyjeh IM, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Undurraga EA, Venketasubramanian N, Vijayakumar L, Vos T, Wagner GR, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Wilkinson JD, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Yip P, Zabetian A, Zheng ZJ, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380: 2095–2128, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, Rolle-Kampczyk U, von Bergen M, McCoy KD, Macpherson AJ, Danska JS. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science 339: 1084–1088, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Marlovits S, Stocker R, Efstratiou A, Broughton K, Kaider A, Vecsei V, Kollaritsch H. Effect on diphtheria immunity of combined tetanus and diphtheria booster vaccination in adults. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19: 506–513, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.McKay LI, Cidlowski JA. Molecular control of immune/inflammatory responses: interactions between nuclear factor-kappa B and steroid receptor-signaling pathways. Endocr Rev 20: 435–459, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Messaoudi I, Lemaoult J, Guevara-Patino JA, Metzner BM, Nikolich-Zugich J. Age-related CD8 T cell clonal expansions constrict CD8 T cell repertoire and have the potential to impair immune defense. J Exp Med 200: 1347–1358, 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Mondal S, Rai U. Sexual dimorphism in phagocytic activity of wall lizard's splenic macrophages and its control by sex steroids. Gen Comp Endocrinol 116: 291–298, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Naylor K, Li G, Vallejo AN, Lee WW, Koetz K, Bryl E, Witkowski J, Fulbright J, Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. The influence of age on T cell generation and TCR diversity. J Immunol 174: 7446–7452, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Neal-Perry G, Nejat E, Dicken C. The neuroendocrine physiology of female reproductive aging: an update. Maturitas 67: 34–38, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nichol K, Margolis K, Wuorenma J, Von Sternberg T. The efficacy and cost effectiveness of vaccination against influenza among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 331: 778–784, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Nichol KL, Margolis KL, Lind A, Murdoch M, McFadden R, Hauge M, Magnan S, Drake M. Side effects associated with influenza vaccination in healthy working adults. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 156: 1546–1550, 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Nichol KL, Nordin JD, Nelson DB, Mullooly JP, Hak E. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in the community-dwelling elderly. N Engl J Med 357: 1373–1381, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. Washington. DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Perheentupa A, Huhtaniemi I. Aging of the human ovary and testis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 299: 2–13, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Pernis AB. Estrogen CD4+ cells T. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19: 414–420, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Pinheiro I, Dejager L, Libert C. X-chromosome-located microRNAs in immunity: might they explain male/female differences? The X chromosome-genomic context may affect X-located miRNAs and downstream signaling, thereby contributing to the enhanced immune response of females. Bioessays 33: 791–802, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pisitkun P, Deane JA, Difilippantonio MJ, Tarasenko T, Satterthwaite AB, Bolland S. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science 312: 1669–1672, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Plotkin SA. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 1055–1065, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Plotkin SA. Vaccines: correlates of vaccine-induced immunity. Clin Infect Dis 47: 401–409, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Jacobson RM. Personalized vaccines: the emerging field of vaccinomics. Expert Opin Biol Ther 8: 1659–1667, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Kennedy RB, Lambert ND, Kirkland JL. A systems biology approach to the effect of aging, immunosenescence and vaccine response. Curr Opin Immunol 29: 62–68, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Roghmann KJ, Tablosk PA, Bentley DW, Schiffman G. Immune response of elderly adults to pneumococcus: variation by age, sex, and functional impairment. J Gerontol 42: 265–270, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sankilampi U, Honkanen PO, Bloigu A, Herva E, Leinonen M. Antibody response to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in the elderly. J Infect Dis 173: 387–393, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sasaki S, Sullivan M, Narvaez CF, Holmes TH, Furman D, Zheng NY, Nishtala M, Wrammert J, Smith K, James JA, Dekker CL, Davis MM, Wilson PC, Greenberg HB, He XS. Limited efficacy of inactivated influenza vaccine in elderly individuals is associated with decreased production of vaccine-specific antibodies. J Clin Invest 121: 3109–3119, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Schwarzinger M, Flicoteaux R, Cortarenoda S, Obadia Y, Moatti JP. Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance? PLos One 5: e10199, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Simell B, Lahdenkari M, Reunanen A, Käyhty H, Väkeväinen M. Effects of ageing and gender on naturally acquired antibodies to pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides and virulence-associated proteins. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15: 1391–1397, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Simon V. Wanted: women in clinical trials. Science 308: 1517, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sočan M, Frelih T, Janet E, Petraš T, Peternelj B. Reactions after pneumococcal vaccine alone or in combination with influenza vaccine. Vaccine 22: 3087–3091, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Soneji S, Metlay J. Mortality reductions for older adults differ by race/ethnicity and gender since the introduction of adult and pediatric pneumococcal vaccines. Public Health Rep 126: 259, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Spitzer JA. Gender differences in some host defense mechanisms. Lupus 8: 380–383, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Stark K, Schönfeld C, Barg J, Molz B, Vornwald A, Bienzle U. Seroprevalence and determinants of diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis antibodies among adults in Berlin, Germany. Vaccine 17: 844–850, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Talaat KR, Greenberg ME, Lai MH, Hartel GF, Wichems CH, Rockman S, Jeanfreau RJ, Ghosh MR, Kabongo ML, Gittleson C. A single dose of unadjuvanted novel 2009 H1N1 vaccine is immunogenic and well tolerated in young and elderly adults. J Infect Dis 202: 1327–1337, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.To KW, Lee S, Chan TO, Lee SS. Exploring determinants of acceptance of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccination in nurses. Am J Infect Control 38: 623–630, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Vila-Córcoles A, Rodriguez T, de Diego C, Ochoa O, Valdivieso A, Salsench E, Ansa X, Badía W, Saún N, Group ES. Effect of influenza vaccine status on winter mortality in Spanish community-dwelling elderly people during 2002–2005 influenza periods. Vaccine 25: 6699–6707, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Villacres MC, Longmate J, Auge C, Diamond DJ. Predominant type 1 CMV-specific memory T-helper response in humans: evidence for gender differences in cytokine secretion. Hum Immunol 65: 476–485, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wang CS, Wang ST, Chou P. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination of the elderly in a densely populated and unvaccinated community. Vaccine 20: 2494–2499, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Weinberg GA, Szilagyi PG. Vaccine epidemiology: efficacy, effectiveness, and the translational research roadmap. J Infect Dis 201: 1607–1610, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Weinstein Y, Ran S, Segal S. Sex-associated differences in the regulation of immune responses controlled by the MHC of the mouse. J Immunol 132: 656–661, 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wenisch C, Patruta S, Daxbock F, Krause R, Horl W. Effect of age on human neutrophil function. J Leukoc Biol 67: 40–45, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.White W, Barnes G, Barker E, Gall D, Knight P, Griffith A, Morris-Owen R, Smith J. Reactions to tetanus toxoid. J Hygiene 71: 283–297, 1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Wiemken TL, Carrico RM, Klein SL, Jonsson CB, Peyrani P, Kelley RR, Aliberti S, Blasi F, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Lopardo G. The effectiveness of the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine for the prevention of hospitalizations due to Streptococcus pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly differs between the sexes: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) international cohort study. Vaccine 32: 2198–2203, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Wikby A, Mansson IA, Johansson B, Strindhall J, Nilsson SE. The immune risk profile is associated with age and gender: findings from three Swedish population studies of individuals 20–100 years of age. Biogerontology 9: 299–308, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115a.World Health Organization. WHO Vaccine-Preventable Diseases: Monitoring System: 2010 Global Summary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, Heath AC, Warner B, Reeder J, Kuczynski J, Caporaso JG, Lozupone CA, Lauber C, Clemente JC, Knights D, Knight R, Gordon JI. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486: 222–227, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Yurkovetskiy L, Burrows M, Khan AA, Graham L, Volchkov P, Becker L, Antonopoulos D, Umesaki Y, Chervonsky AV. Gender bias in autoimmunity is influenced by microbiota. Immunity 39: 400–412, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

