Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Nov 4;5:15957. doi: 10.1038/srep15957

Compressible and monolithic microporous polymer sponges prepared via one-pot synthesis

Yoonbin Lim 1, Min Chul Cha 1, Ji Young Chang 1,a
PMCID: PMC4632124  PMID: 26534834

Abstract

Compressible and monolithic microporous polymers (MPs) are reported. MPs were prepared as monoliths via a Sonogashira–Hagihara coupling reaction of 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene (TEB) with the bis(bromothiophene) monomer (PBT-Br). The polymers were reversibly compressible, and were easily cut into any form using a knife. Microscopy studies on the MPs revealed that the polymers had tubular microstructures, resembling those often found in marine sponges. Under compression, elastic buckling of the tube bundles was observed using an optical microscope. MP-0.8, which was synthesized using a 0.8:1 molar ratio of PBT-Br to TEB, showed microporosity with a BET surface area as high as 463 m2g–1. The polymer was very hydrophobic, with a water contact angle of 145° and absorbed 7–17 times its own weight of organic liquids. The absorbates were released by simple compression, allowing recyclable use of the polymer. MPs are potential precursors of structured carbon materials; for example, a partially graphitic material was obtained by pyrolysis of MP-0.8, which showed a similar tubular structure to that of MP-0.8.

The fascinating morphologies of sea sponges have inspired researchers in materials science. The outer surface cells of a sponge have many small holes called dermal pores through which large volumes of water can move inside the sponge. Internal channels are also found in the outer surface cells. The skeleton of a sponge consists of collagens and inorganic components, such as silica and calcium carbonate. Some sponges have collagen fibres that constitute a network structure, called spongin1. Sponge-like structures have been widely adapted for synthetic materials and have shown enhanced performance in their application in various areas, such as nanogeneration, catalysis, supercapacitance, photovoltaics, drug delivery, and tissue generation2,3,4,5,6,7,8.

As a material, a sponge is characterized by its porosity, flexibility, and compressibility. Sponges with a network structure of spongin fibres obtained from sea animals have been used for removing liquids by absorption since ancient times. There is also a variety of synthetic polymer sponges available. One of the most common methods to synthesize sponges is to mix a polymer with an inorganic crystal, such as sodium sulfate, which is then removed by heating the mixture to generate pores in the polymer matrix. The pore size formed depends on the size of the crystals, which usually ranges from the millimetre down to the micrometre scale. Sponges prepared using the emulsion solvent diffusion method are known to have pores in the mesopore range9. Polymer sponges based on materials, such as chitosan10, melamine11, cellulose12, and polydimethylsiloxane13 have been chemically modified to provide them with properties suitable for specific applications.

Recently, there have been efforts to synthesize sponges with small pores using a bottom-up approach. Gui et al. reported on monolithic carbon nanotube (CNT)-based sponges using a chemical vapour deposition process employing ferrocene and 1,2-dichlorobenzene as a catalyst precursor and a carbon source, respectively14. These CNT sponges had a surface area of 300–400 m2g–1 and an average pore size of about 80 nm. Hashim et al. synthesized macroporous (pore diameter >50 nm) CNT sponges via a boron-doping strategy during the chemical vapour deposition of toluene using ferrocene as the catalyst precursor. Excess boron atoms were found in the “elbow” junctions forming nanotube covalent interconnections15.

The most attractive feature of sponges is their compressibility, which enables easy removal of absorbates by applying pressure. While sponges with large pores are mainly used for removing liquids by absorption, sponges with micropores will have a wider range of applications, such as in molecular storage, separation, and catalysis. According to IUPAC notation16,17, microporosity refers to porosity with pores having a diameter <2 nm. Zeolites, activated carbons, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are typical microporous materials, but they are not compressible. Recently, microporous organic polymers (MOPs) have been studied extensively because of their versatile functionality and mechanical stability. Most MOPs are usually prepared using a stepwise polymerization of tri- or higher multifunctional building blocks, and are obtained as precipitated particles because of their cross-linked structures. Although macroscopic gels18,19 or monolithic polymers20,21,22 are sometimes formed, they are easily broken into pieces after drying. To our knowledge, compressible microporous polymers have not yet been reported.

Herein, we report on compressible, monolithic microporous polymer sponges with tubular structures, prepared via a one-pot synthesis. We synthesized a series of microporous polymers using the cross-coupling reactions of multifunctional aromatic monomers. From among several possible combinations, the reaction conditions were clarified under which compressible polymer monoliths could be produced. In this paper, we discuss the compressibility mechanisms along with the microstructures and porous properties of these polymers.

Results

Synthesis and characterization

Compressible MPs were prepared via a Sonogashira–Hagihara coupling reaction of 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene (TEB) with the bis(bromothiophene) monomer (PBT-Br) (Fig. 1)18. PBT-Br was synthesized from a Stille coupling reaction of 1,4-dibromo-2,5-difluorobenzene with 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene, followed by bromination with N-bromosuccinimide. The polymerization reactions of PBT-Br and TEB were carried out in a mixture of toluene and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (1:1, v/v). The TEB dissolved well in the polymerization medium at room temperature, but the PBT-Br was only slightly soluble. Unless otherwise noted, the polymerization reactions were carried out at 100 °C for 24 h. The monomer feed ratio influenced the resulting polymer morphology. Five polymers were synthesized, MP-0.5, MP-0.8, MP-1.0, MP-1.2, and MP-1.5, which were synthesized by changing the molar ratio between PBT-Br and TEB as 0.5:1, 0.8:1, 1:1, 1.2:1, and 1.5:1, respectively. MP-0.8, MP-1.0, MP-1.2, and MP-1.5 were obtained as monoliths, but MP-0.5 was obtained as a powder.

Figure 1. Reaction scheme for the synthesis of the bis(bromothiophene) monomer (PBT-Br) and microporous polymers (MPs).

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The polymers were prepared by a Sonogashira-Hagihara coupling reaction.

2,2′-(1,4-Phenylene)bis(5-bromothiophene) is an structural analog of PBT-Br and has no fluoro groups. The polymerization reaction of the analog with TEB (the molar ratio between the analog and TEB = 0.8:1) in toluene/DMF (1:1 v/v) gave only powders, whereas in toluene, the same reaction produced a compressible monolith consisting of tubes and flakes (Supplementary Fig. S1). 2,2′-(1,4-Phenylene)bis(5-bromothiophene) was less soluble in toluene compared with PBT-Br and practically insoluble in DMF at room temperature. These results showed that the appropriate solubility of the reactants was also important for the formation of a compressible monolithic polymer.

It was very notable that cross-linked microporous polymers were formed as monoliths, which were usually obtained as powders23,24,25,26,27,28. Although some studies have reported where the reaction mixture turned into a gel during the Sonogashira–Hagihara coupling reactions of multifunctional monomers, the gel then fragmented into pieces when applying workup processes18,19.

Electron microscopy studies have shown that monolithic polymers have very interesting microstructures. Figure 2a–c shows scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of MP-0.8 that consisted mainly of tubes with diameters in the range of a few hundred nanometres, together with spherical particles on the micrometre scale. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and SEM images suggested that these tubes had hollow structures with open ends (Fig. 2d–f). This microstructure resembles that often observed in marine sponge animals29. Some tubes were bundled into fibrous assemblies that had become entangled with each other to form a monolithic structure14. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements revealed that MP-0.8 was amorphous without any long-range ordering (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Figure 2. Electron microscope images of MPs.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a–c) SEM images of MP-0.8 (scale bar: a = 100 μm, b = 10 μm, and c = 5 μm). (d–f) TEM images of MP-0.8 (scale bar: d = 500 nm, e = 1 μm, and f = 1 μm). SEM images of (g) MP-1.0 (scale bar = 100 μm), (h) MP-1.2 (scale bar = 20 μm), and (i) MP-1.5 (scale bar = 10 μm).

Element mapping of the main elements of MP-0.8 by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) showed that carbon, fluorine, and sulfur were distributed uniformly throughout the sample (Supplementary Fig. S3). This result suggests that the Sonogashira–Hagihara cross-coupling reaction between PBT-Br and TEB monomers occurred predominantly, although a homocoupling reaction of TEB could occur under the reaction conditions used19. Relatively higher concentrations of carbon, fluorine, and sulfur in the spherical particle regions reflected the solid character of the particles and the hollow structure of the tubes, which agreed well with the results obtained from the TEM images.

The other monolithic polymers also had similar fibrous tubular microstructures. Figure 2g–i shows SEM images of MP-1.0, MP-1.2, and MP-1.5, respectively. Notably, more tube bundles with diameters around 10 μm were observed in MP-0.8 and MP-1.0 than in other polymers. MP-1.5 consisted mainly of highly entangled individual tubes. MP-1.0 and MP-1.2 showed a compressible behaviour that was comparable to MP-0.8, but MP-1.5 was hard with low compressibility.

The porosity of MPs was investigated using cryogenic N2 adsorption–desorption experiments (Supplementary Fig. S4). The gradient of the N2 adsorption isotherm increased sharply at low relative pressures, indicating the existence of micropores. Non-local density functional theory (NL-DFT) pore size distribution calculations on MPs also revealed that the polymer had micropores with diameters <2 nm along with mesopores. Because the polymer morphology was influenced by the monomer feed ratio used in the polymer synthesis, so too was the resulting polymer porosity. The BET surface areas of the polymers decreased as the molar ratio of PBT-Br increased, so that MP-0.5 showed the highest BET surface area of 853 m2g–1, followed by MP-0.8 (463 m2g–1), MP-1.0 (109 m2g–1), MP-1.2 (62 m2g–1), and MP-1.5 (non-porous) (Supplementary Fig. S5). This tendency was attributable in part to the formation of a less dense network on incorporation of more PBT-Br. The BET surface area of MP-0.5 was similar to that of a TEB homocoupled microporous polymer reported in the literature (842 m2g–1)19, suggesting that the homocoupling of ethynyl groups was dominant because they were in excess in the reaction mixture. The polymer obtained from 2,2′-(1,4-phenylene)bis(5-bromothiophene) and TEB (the molar ratio = 0.8:1) in toluene/DMF (1:1 v/v) showed the BET surface area of 86 m2g−1. We focused on MP-0.8 for further experiments, which showed the highest surface area among the compressible monolithic polymers.

MP-0.8 was prepared in various shapes and sizes that were retained, even after several workup processes, including washing, Soxhlet extraction, and drying at elevated temperatures. Figure 3a shows an image of MP-0.8 prepared in a 10 mL vial as a mold. Dry MP-0.8 was easily cut into any form using a knife. The polymer exhibited reversible compressibility (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Movie S1). Only a small change was observed in the compressive stress–strain curves (Fig. 3c) measured over 10 cycles of repeated stress loading and unloading, which suggested a high mechanical stability of the polymer against compressive force11,30. Hysteresis in the compressive stress-strain curve indicated the stiffness of the polymer31. Compressibility is usually exhibited in solids having cellular or foam structures containing pores or voids inside32; however, to our knowledge, observing a compressible behaviour in highly cross-linked microporous polymers is unprecedented.

Figure 3. Monolithic and compressible properties of MP-0.8.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Images of MP-0.8 prepared in a 10 mL vial as a mold (upper) and of the polymer cut into a star shape (lower). (b) Images of MP-0.8 under loaded and unloaded conditions (scale bar = 5 mm). (c) Compressive stress–strain curves of MP-0.8 for the first and tenth test cycles.

The solid state 13C cross-polarization/magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (CP/MAS NMR) spectrum of MP-0.8 (Supplementary Fig. S6) showed aromatic carbon peaks arising from benzene and thiophene rings occurring from 115 to 140 ppm. The peaks assigned to the acetylene carbon atoms linked to the benzene and thiophene rings were observed at 85 and 96 ppm, respectively. The intense peak observed at 155 ppm was assigned to the fluorine-substituted aromatic carbon atoms. This peak was not observed in the spectrum of the polymer obtained from 2,2′-(1,4-phenylene)bis(5-bromothiophene) and TEB (the molar ratio = 0.8:1) in toluene/DMF (1:1 v/v) (Supplementary Fig. S6). In the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum of MP-0.8, the peak at 3280 cm–1, assignable to the C–H stretching vibration of the ethynyl groups in the terminal TEB units, was very weak (Supplementary Fig. S7), indicating that most of the ethynyl groups of the TEB molecules participated in the polymerization reaction, as was expected. Polymer MP-0.8 was thermally stable up to 300 °C (Supplementary Fig. S8) as measured using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).

Microstructure development

To follow the development of the tubular structures, we investigated the morphology of the products that formed in the early stages of the reaction. Figure 4a shows time-dependent images of the reaction products of PBT-Br and TEB (molar ratio = 0.8:1) in toluene/DMF (1:1, v/v). After a reaction time of 5 min at 100 °C, tiny particles precipitated out of the dark solution in which monomers and catalysts were fully dissolved. Soon after, a brown monolith began to form, filling the reaction vial. The reaction mixture became immobile within 15 min, and no visible flow occurred when the vial was turned upside down.

Figure 4. Effect of the reaction time on MP-0.8.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Time-dependent images of a reaction mixture of PBT-Br and TEB (molar ratio = 0.8:1) in toluene/DMF (1:1, v/v) on a hotplate. (b) Strain–stress curves of the samples obtained after different reaction times. SEM images of the samples obtained after a reaction time of (c) 10 min and (d) 3 h (scale bars = 40 μm). (e) SEM image of MP-lin (scale bar = 40 μm).

A monolithic solid (MP-0.8–10 min) isolated after a reaction time of 10 min was slightly compressible (Fig. 4b). Tubular entities, together with spherical particles, were observed in the SEM image of MP-0.8–10 min, suggesting that tubular structures formed at an early stage of the reaction (Fig. 4c). The microstructures of all the polymers obtained after a reaction time of 3 h appeared similar in their SEM images (Fig. 4d), but the compressibility of the polymers increased with increasing reaction time (Fig. 4b). The solid state 13C NMR spectrum of MP-0.8–3 h was similar to that of MP-0.8 (Supplementary Fig. S9).

Tubular fibres and their bundles are intriguing morphologies that are not expected in polymers prepared from a cross-coupling reaction of multifunctional monomers. There have been a few reports on the formation of tubular structures of cross-linked polymers33,34,35,36, but the mechanism is not fully understood. The formation of tubular shapes is most likely induced by step reactions in combination with the structured self-assembly of the reactants. Presumably, linear oligomers having reactive ethynyl groups on each repeating unit are produced first from the cross-coupling reaction between two of the three ethynyl groups of TEB and two C–Br groups of PBT-Br. These develop into tubular structures on further reaction with monomers or oligomers. The reactivity of the soluble oligomers with twisted structures seems to play an important role in this process. MP-lin synthesized from PBT-Br and 1,3-diethynylbenzene instead of TEB under the same reaction conditions as those for MP-0.8 does not form any tubular structures, as observed in the SEM image shown in Fig. 4e. Both monomers, PBT-Br and 1,3-diethynylbenzene, have a bifunctionality, and therefore, the resulting polymers should have linear structures.

Origin of the compressibility

To understand the origin of the compressibility, the change in microstructure of MP-0.8 under stress was investigated using an optical microscope. Although we were unable to distinguish individual fibres because of the limited resolution of the optical microscope, some fibre bundles with lengths of tens of micrometres were clearly observed under the optical microscope (Fig. 5a). The polymer monolith resembled a non-woven fabric, where fibrous units are randomly entangled to form a monolith. The change in morphology of the polymer was imaged while a compressive stress was applied. As denoted by the yellow lines in Fig. 5a, the bundles were bent in the direction perpendicular to the direction of compressive stress. The initial structure was restored upon release of the stress, which suggested that the mechanism of the compressibility was linked to the elastic buckling of the bundled tubular assemblies. Individual tubes would not have enough durability to maintain their structure under compressive stress. However, through bundling they are able to withstand the load because the assembled tubes are able to support each other and distribute the loaded stress37,38. This mechanism is shown schematically in Fig. 5b.

Figure 5. Mechanism of the compressibility of MP-0.8.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Optical microscope images of MP-0.8 taken under loaded and unloaded conditions (scale bar = 50 μm). (b) Schematic drawing of the mechanism of the compressibility of MP-0.8.

Absorption properties

MPs are expected to show a high absorption capacity with selectivity towards hydrophobic liquids because of their aromatic hydrocarbon structures and microporosities10,11,12,39. Materials with such properties have potential applications in environmental pollution control, such as for marine oil spill recovery. Sorbent materials with compressibility will be particularly useful when the sorbents or sorbed substances need to be recycled.

As shown in Fig. 6a,b, the surface of MP-0.8 was very hydrophobic with a water contact angle of 145° 40. The selective absorption of a hydrophobic pollutant over water by MP-0.8 was examined. A polluted aqueous sample was prepared by mixing water with n-decane dyed with Oil Red O for visualization. When a sample of MP-0.8 was added to the solution, n-decane was selectively removed within a period of tens of seconds (Fig. 6c). The n-decane was released by simple compression and then reabsorbed by MP-0.8 (Fig. 6d), demonstrating the possibility of recycling the polymer on use. The absorption properties of MP-0.8 for various organic liquids were also investigated. MP-0.8 could absorb 7–17 times its weight in liquid (Fig. 6e). There was a linear correlation between the absorption capacity of MP-0.8 and the density of an absorbate (Fig. 6f), suggesting that the absorption capacity was dependent on the accessible pore volume.

Figure 6. Hydrophobicity and absorption properties of MP-0.8.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) The water contact angle measured on the surface of MP-0.8. (b) A droplet of water dyed with Rhodamine B on the surface of MP-0.8. (c) Removal of n-decane dyed with Oil Red O floating on water using MP-0.8. (d) Release of absorbed n-decane by compression and repeated absorption using MP-0.8. (e) Absorption capacity of MP-0.8 for various liquids, and (f) their correlation with the absorbate density.

Microporous materials can absorb and store small molecules more efficiently than mesoporous or macroporous materials can. For this reason, there has been extensive research into the application of microporous polymers for the removal of toxic chemicals in the air and in solutions28,39,41. We examined the possible use of MP-0.8 for the removal of small molecules from a solution and their subsequent release by compression. Sudan I was chosen as a test molecule, which has been used as a food colouring, but now its usage is banned because of its genotoxic and carcinogenic properties42.

A sample of MP-0.8 (50 mg) was immersed in 5 mL of a solution of Sudan I in ethanol (5.0 × 10–5 M) and manually compressed and released in situ at a rate of about 5 s per cycle. The UV–Vis absorption of the solution was monitored every 25 cycles. Figure 7a shows that a gradual decrease in the absorption intensity of Sudan I in the solution was observed. The yellowish solution became almost colourless after 100 cycles, indicating that Sudan I had been removed by the polymer (Fig. 7b). In contrast, when a static absorption experiment was carried out by immersing the same mass of MP-0.8 in 5 mL of the Sudan I solution (5.0 × 10–5 M) for 10 min43, the UV–Vis spectrum of the resulting solution showed only a small decrease in the concentration of Sudan I. It appears that the repeated compression and release facilitated interfacial contact between Sudan I in the solution and the MP-0.8 with a resulting enhancement of the absorption performance of the polymer. The microporosity of MP-0.8 could also be an important factor influencing the absorption performance, as it would impede the release of any adsorbed Sudan I during compression. To verify this proposition, the same tests were performed using a commercially available macroporous urethane sponge (Vtot = 0.168 cm3g–1 at p/p0 = 0.99 and Vmicro = 6.34 × 10–3 cm3g–1 at p/p0 = 0.10; Supplementary Fig. S10). The urethane sponge was immersed statically in a Sudan I solution for 10 min and was also compressed and released 100 times. The UV–Vis spectra of the solutions measured after the tests were almost the same, and were similar to the spectrum of the initial solution, indicating that Sudan I was barely absorbed by the urethane sponge.

Figure 7. Efficient dye removal using MP-0.8.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) UV–Vis spectra of Sudan I solutions (initial concentration = 5.0 × 10–5 M in ethanol) measured after removing a dye by MP-0.8 (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 cycles of compression and release, and a static absorption for 10 min) and by a urethane sponge (100 cycles of compression and release) (black circles). (b) Photographs of the above solutions. (c) UV–Vis spectra of the Sudan I stock solution and a filtered solution. (d) Sequential photographs showing Sudan I dye capture using an MP-0.8 syringe filter.

MP-0.8 could be also used as a syringe filter for more facile and rapid removal of a dye44 (Fig. 7c,d). Due to its monolithic character, MP-0.8 was fabricated into a shape that fitted into the inner diameter of a syringe. We placed a Sudan I solution into a syringe whose outlet was blocked with MP-0.8 and then pressed the solution out through the material. The yellow Sudan I solution turned colourless as it passed through the MP-0.8. The UV–Vis spectrum of the filtrate showed that most of the dye molecules were removed in this process (Fig. 7c).

Carbonization

MPs with tubular structures are potential precursors of structured carbon materials35. MP-0.8 was carbonized at 800 °C under inert N2 gas to form MP-0.8-C with a char yield of 47.6%. An SEM study showed that the tubular structure of MP-0.8 was maintained after pyrolysis (Fig. 8a). Newly formed holes observed on the tube surfaces indicated that some organic entities were vaporized during the pyrolysis. Raman spectroscopy showed a G band occurring at 1598 cm–1 together with a D band occurring at 1355 cm–1 (Fig. 8b), indicating that MP-0.8-C was partially graphitic. The BET surface area increased markedly to 1288 m2/g after carbonization (Fig. 8c). The NL-DFT pore size distribution showed a generation of ultra-micropores with sizes around 0.45 nm (Fig. 8d)45. MP-0.8-C did not exhibit a compressible and monolithic character.

Figure 8. Carbonization of MP-0.8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) SEM image (scale bar = 2 μm) and (b) Raman spectrum of MP-0.8-C. (c) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of MP-0.8-C measured at 77 K. (d) NL-DFT pore size distribution of MP-0.8-C.

Discussion

We have observed the formation of compressible monolithic polymers, MPs, from a cross-coupling reaction of multifunctional aromatic compounds. A microscope study revealed that the polymers consisted mainly of tubes and their bundles, together with spherical particles. The polymer morphology was influenced by the experimental conditions, such as the monomer feed ratio and solvent used. Although the mechanism for the development of these intriguing MP morphologies requires further research, our study suggests that tubular shapes are most likely formed by step reactions in combination with structured self-assembly of the reactants in the reaction mixture, such as monomers, linear oligomers, and branched polymers having reactive ethynyl groups. Regarding the observation of compressibility of the polymers, the bundled tubular structures appear to be responsible for this via elastic buckling under stress. As the tube bundles are rigid and are strong enough to endure compressive stress, they did not undergo structural destruction under load and recovered their original macroscopic shape once the stress was removed. The polymers showed a degree of microporosity, which was suitable for the removal of toxic chemicals from the environment. In particular, the compressibility and monolithic character of these polymers allowed for the facile release of adsorbed chemicals by applying pressure and thereby imparting a good recyclability. We believe that our discovery of microporous polymers with these unprecedented properties will contribute greatly to research into soft sorbent materials and to an increase in their applications.

Methods

Materials

All chemicals, reagents, and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo Chemical Industry, or Junsei Chemical and used without any further purification. Urethane sponge was obtained from a product manufactured by 3 M and washed with ethanol and acetone before using.

Measurements

1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance 300 spectrometer (300 MHz). 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Jeol JNM-LA400 (400 MHz). Solid-state 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 WB spectrometer (100 MHz) equipped with a CP/MAS probe. Elemental analyses were performed using a Flash EA 1112 elemental analyzer. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrum (MALDI-TOF/MS) was recorded on a MALDI TOF-TOF 5800 System. TGA were performed on a TA modulated TGA2050 with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen. The compression test was performed on a KES-FB3 automatic compression tester. SEM images were obtained by Carl Zeiss SUPRA 55 VP. TEM images were obtained by a Carl Zeiss LIBRA 120 operating at 120 kV. TEM samples were dispersed in ethanol and a drop of the mixture was placed on a carbon-coated copper TEM grid. EDS elemental maps were obtained using an Oxford instrument X-MaxN detector and analyzed with AZtecEnergy EDS analysis. Optical Microscope images were obtained using an Olympus BX51. PXRD patterns were obtained using a New D8 Advance (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54 Å). For a monomer, FT-IR measurement was made by a PERKIN ELMER Spectrum GX I using a KBr pellet. For polymers, FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer using attenuated total reflectance (window ZnSe/diamond). N2 uptake amounts were measured by a Belsorp-Max (BEL Japan, Inc.) apparatus. UV-Vis spectra were obtained with the use of a Sinco S-3150 spectrometer. The water contact angle was measured using a KSV CAM 101-Optical Contact Angle and Surface Tension Meter. Raman spectroscopy was conducted using a RAMANplus confocal laser Raman microscope (Nanophoton).

Synthesis of 2,2′-(2,5-difluoro-1,4-phenylene)bisthiophene (PBT)

To a solution of 1,4-dibromo-2,5-difluorobenzene (1.50 g, 5.52 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (255 mg, 0.221 mmol) in DMF (50 mL), was added 2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene (4.94 g, 13.2 mmol). After stirring at 100 °C in darkness for 24 h, the mixture was cooled down to room temperature, poured into distilled water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was dried with MgSO4, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Remaining solid was recrystallized (tetrahydrofuran/ethanol, 1:9) to give colorless solid (998 mg, 65%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.51 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (m, 4H), 7.15 (t, 2H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, THF-d8): δ 157.28, 154.75, 136.41, 128.65, 128.09, 123.02, 116.27; Analysis (calcd, found for C14H8F2S2): C (60.41, 60.69), H (2.90, 2.78), S (23.04, 23.07).

Synthesis of 2,2′-(2,5-difluoro-1,4-phenylene)bis(5-bromothiophene) (PBT-Br)

To a solution of 2,2′-(2,5-difluoro-1,4-phenylene)bisthiophene (1.16 g, 4.17 mmol) in DMF (50 mL), was added N-bromosuccinimide (1.49 g, 8.37 mmol). After stirring at room temperature in darkness for 12 h, the mixture was poured into distilled water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was dried with MgSO4, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Remaining solid was recrystallized (tetrahydrofuran/ethanol, 1:9) to give colorless solid (1.56 g, 86%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.34 (t, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, THF-d8): δ 157.15, 154.66, 137.81, 131.87, 128.32, 122.65, 115.77; Analysis (calcd, found for C14H6Br2F2S2): C (38.55, 38.72), H (1.39, 1.26), S (14.70, 14.76). FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3090, 1741, 1549, 1487, 1407, 1278, 1171, 873, 788, 487, 440. MALDI-TOF/MS spectrum is shown in Supplementary Fig. S11.

General procedure for polymerization by Sonogashira-Hagihara coupling reactions

A typical procedure was as follows: PBT-Br (300 mg, 0.688 mmol), TEB (129 mg, 0.859 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (35.0 mg, 49.9 μmol), and CuI (11.5 mg, 60.4 μmol) were dissolved in a co-solvent of toluene (2.5 mL) and DMF (2.5 mL) and the mixture was heated up with stirring. At the moment the temperature reached 50 °C, triethylamine (TEA, 2.5 mL) was added dropwise and the reaction proceeded at 100 °C for 24 h. The produced polymer monolith was taken out of the reaction vessel and washed with methanol, water, tetrahydrofuran, and acetone. After Soxhlet extraction with methanol and drying in vacuo at 120 °C, the polymer (MP-0.8) was obtained as a light brown monolith. FT-IR (cm−1): 3280, 3069, 1681, 1581, 1496, 1456, 1175, 869, 799, 678. Analysis (found): C (68.94), H (2.99), S (11.22).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lim, Y. et al. Compressible and monolithic microporous polymer sponges prepared via one-pot synthesis. Sci. Rep. 5, 15957; doi: 10.1038/srep15957 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep15957-s1.pdf (568.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary Movie S1
srep15957-s2.swf (1.6MB, swf)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2010-0017552, 2015R1A2A2A01006585).

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.L. synthesized the monomers and the polymers reported in this paper and discovered compressible and monolithic character of the polymers. Material property measurements were carried out by Y.L. M.C.C. contributed to the studies on tubular structure formation and the origin of compressibility. All the research processes were conducted under supervision of J.Y.C. The draft of manuscript was written by Y.L. and revised by J.Y.C.

References

  1. Brusca R. C. & Brusca G. J. Invertebrates, 2nd Ed. (Sinauer Associates, 2003). [Google Scholar]
  2. Mao Y. et al. Sponge-like piezoelectric polymer films for scalable and integratable nanogenerators and self-powered electronic systems. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1301624 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. Shalom M. et al. Sponge-like nickel and nickel nitride structures for catalytic applications. Adv. Mater. 26, 1272–1276 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu X.-L. et al. Biomass-derived sponge-like carbonaceous hydrogels and aerogels for supercapacitors. ACS Nano 7, 3589–3597 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu Y., Guo J. & Wang C. Sponge-like porous carbon/tin composite anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 9562–9567 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. Orlu M., Cevher E. & Araman A. Design and evaluation of colon specific drug delivery system containing flurbiprofen microsponges. Int. J. Pharm. 318, 103–117 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lazzeri L. et al. Gelatine/PLLA sponge-like scaffolds: morphological and biological characterization. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18, 1399–1405 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perlich J., Kaune G., Memesa M. , Gutmann J. S. & Müller-Buschbaum P. Sponge-like structures for application in photovoltaics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 1783–1798 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kawashima Y., Iwamoto T., Niwa T., Takeuchi T. & Hino T. Role of the solvent-diffusion-rate modifier in a new emulsion solvent diffusion method for preparation of ketoprofen microspheres. J. Microencapsul. 10, 329–340 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Y. et al. Microporous spongy chitosan monoliths doped with graphene oxide as highly effective adsorbent for methyl orange and copper nitrate (Cu(NO3)2) ions. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 416, 243–251 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ruan C., Ai K., Li X. & Lu L. A superhydrophobic sponge with excellent absorbency and flame retardancy. Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 53, 5556–5560 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang Z., Sèbe G., Rentsch D., Zimmermann T. & Tingaut P. Ultralightweight and flexible silylated nanocellulose sponges for the selective removal of oil from water. Chem. Mater. 26, 2659–2668 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. Han J.-W., Kim B., Li J. & Meyyappan M. Flexible, compressible, hydrophobic, floatable, and conductive carbon nanotubepolymer sponge. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 051903 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gui X. et al. Carbon nanotube sponges. Adv. Mater. 22, 617–621 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hashim D. P. et al. Covalently bonded three-dimensional carbon nanotube solids via boron induced nanojunctions. Sci. Rep. 2, 363 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Burwell R. L. Jr. Manual of symbols and terminology for physicochemical quantities and units-appendix II. Pure & Appl. Chem. 46, 71–90 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  17. Fitzer E., Köchling K.-H., Boehm H. P. & Marsh H. Recommended terminology for the description of carbon as a solid. Pure & Appl. Chem. 67, 473–506 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang J.-X. et al. Conjugated microporous poly(aryleneethynylene) networks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8574–8578 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang J.-X. et al. Conjugated microporous poly(phenylene butadiynylene)s. Chem. Commun. 486–488 (2008). doi: org/10.1039/b715563h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang Z. J., Landfester K. & Zhang A. I. Hierarchically porous π-conjugated polyHIPE as a heterogeneous photoinitiator for free radical polymerization under visible light. Polym. Chem. 5, 3559–3562 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. Sloaváková E. et al. Chain-growth insertion polymerization of 1,3-diethynylbenzene high internal phase emulsions into reactive π-conjugated foams. Macromolecules 47, 4864–4869 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang K., Vobecka Z., Tauer K., Antonietti M. & Vilela F. π-Conjugated polyHIPEs as highly efficient and reusable heterogeneous photosensitizers. Chem. Commun. 49, 11158–11160 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lim H. & Chang J. Y. Preparation of clickable microporous hydrocarbon particles based on adamantane. Macromolecules 43, 6943–6945 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  24. Lim H., Cha M. C. & Chang J. Y. Preparation of microporous polymers based on 1,3,5-triazine units showing high CO2 adsorption capacity Macromol. Chem. Phys. 213, 1385–1390 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Lim H., Cha M. C. & Chang J. Y. Synthesis of microporous polymers by Friedel-Crafts reaction of 1-bromoadamantane with aromatic compounds and their surface modification. Polym. Chem. 3, 868–870 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee H., Park H. W. & Chang J. Y. Preparation of microporous polymers consisting of tetraphenylethene and alkyne units. Macromol. Res. 21, 1274–1280 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim H., Cha M. C., Park H. W. & Chang J. Y. Preparation of a Yb(III)-incorporated porous polymer by post-coordination: enhancement of gas adsorption and catalytic activity. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 51, 5291–5297 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim H., Choi T., Cha M. C. & Chang J. Y. Preparation of a porous polymer by a catalyst-free Diels-Alder reaction and its structural modification by post-reaction. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 51, 3646–3653 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  29. Alvarez B., Van Soest R. W. M. & Rützler K. Svenzea, a new genus of Dictyonellidae from tropical reef environments. Contrib. Zool. 71, 171 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu H., Zhao Z., Wan W., Gogotsi Y. & Qiu J. Polymer/graphene hybrid aerogel with high compressibility, conductivity, and “sticky” superhydrophobicity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 3242–3249 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. C.-Castro T. del, C.-Ortega M. M., Encians J. C., Franco P. J. H. & C.-Escalante H. J. Piezo-resistance effect in composite based on cross-linked polydimethylsiloxane and polyaniline: potential pressure sensor application. J. Mater. Sci. 47, 1794–1802 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  32. Ashby M. F. & Medalist R. F. M. The mechanical properties of cellular solids. Metall. Trans. A 14, 1755–1769 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  33. Tan D. et al. Conjugated microporous polymer with film and nanotube-like morphologies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 176, 25–30 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  34. Kang N. et al. Nanoparticulate iron oxide tubes from microporous organic nanotubes as stable anode materials for Li ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6626–6630 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Feng X. et al. Synthesis of microporous carbon nanofibers and nanotubes from conjugated polymer network and evaluation in electrochemical capacitor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2125–2129 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  36. Chun J. et al. Tubular-shape evolution of microporous organic networks. Chem. Mater. 24, 3458–3463 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Cao A., Dickrell P. L., Sawyer W. G., G.-Nejhad M. N. & Ajayan P. M. Super-compressible foamlike carbon nanotube films. Science 310, 1307–1310 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yaglioglu Y., Cao A., Hart A. J., Martens R. & Slocum A. H. Wide range control of microstructure and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube forests: a comparison between fixed and floating catalyst CVD techniques. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 5028–5037 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  39. Rao K. V., Mohapatra S., Maji T. K. & George S. J. Guest-responsive reversible swelling and enhanced fluorescence in a super-absorbent, dynamic microporous polymer. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 4505–4509 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Bi H. et al. Highly enhanced performance of spongy graphene as an oil sorbent. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 1652–1656 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen L., Honsho Y., Seki S. & Jiang D. Light-harvesting conjugated microporous polymers: rapid and highly efficient flow of light energy with a porous polyphenylene framework as antenna. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6742–6748 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Larsen J. C. Legal and illegal colours. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 19, S64–S69 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang Y. et al. A compressible mesoporous SiO2 sponge supported by a carbon nanotube network. Nanoscale 6, 3585–3592 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lu Y. et al. Elastic, conductive, polymeric hydrogels and sponges. Sci. Rep. 4, 5792 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao Y., Yao K. X., Teng B., Zhang T. & Han Y. A perfluorinated covalent triazine-based framework for highly selective and water–tolerant CO2 capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 3684–3692 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep15957-s1.pdf (568.3KB, pdf)
Supplementary Movie S1
srep15957-s2.swf (1.6MB, swf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES