Abstract
Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) has a vital role in cell survival. Inhibition of NF-κB has been proven to be an efficient therapeutic pathway for various cancers. Activation of NF-κB is mainly through serine residues' phosphorylation of inhibitor of κBα (IκBα) by IKK complex. Phosphorylation at tyrosine 42 is an alternative pathway in regulation of IκBα and NF-κB signaling, though little is known about the underlying mechanism. Here we identified regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1) as a novel endogenous inhibitor of NF-κB signaling pathway. RCAN1 can interact with IκBα and affect the phosphorylation of IκBα at tyrosine 42. Overexpression of RCAN1 by adenovirus reduced cell viability in lymphoma Raji cells and restrained the growth of lymphoma transplants in mice. We further found that N terminus 1–103aa of RCAN1 is sufficient to inhibit NF-κB and reduce cell viability of lymphoma cells. Our study implicated a novel therapeutic approach for lymphoma by RCAN1 through inhibition of NF-κB signaling.
Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is a family of transcription factors that share homology to the retroviral onco-protein v-Rel. NF-κB is an important regulator of cell survival, proliferation and differentiation.1 NF-κB signaling pathway has a critical role in carcinogenesis, thereby considered to be an important therapeutic target in cancer.2 Abnormal levels of constitutively activated NF-κB have been detected in various solid tumors,3 leukemias, and either in cells of lymphoma patients or lymphoma cell lines.4, 5 NF-κB could resist TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) cell lines infected by Epstein–Barr virus.6 All these results indicate that NF-κB is an interesting therapeutic target in lymphoma.
The mammalian NF-κB families contain five members including RelA (p65), RelB, c-Rel, p50 (p105 precursor) and p52 (p100 precursor), and share a highly conserved DNA-binding domain termed Rel homology region that enables them to form various homo- or hetero-dimeric complexes.7 Activation of NF-κB is tightly modulated by inhibitory subunit known as inhibitor of κB (IκB).8 IκBα binds to NF-κB dimers and sterically blocks their nuclear localization sequences, thereby causing their cytoplasmic retention in rest cells. When cells are stimulated by activators, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and lipopolysaccharide, IκBα are phosphorylated at S32 and S36, which subsequently leads to its degradation by ubiquitin–proteasome pathway.7 Then NF-κB dimers were released and translocated into the nucleus, where they regulate NF-κB target genes' transcription. An alternative mechanism for NF-κB activation involves the phosphorylation of tyrosine (Y) residue 42 of IκBα, with or without inducing its degradation.9, 10 Though there were extensive studies in the serine phosphorylation by IKK complex, little is known about the regulation of IκBα Y42 phosphorylation that also affects NF-κB signaling.
The regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1) is located on chromosome 21 in the region of 21q22.12. RCAN1 inhibits calcineurin–nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT) pathway in vitro and in vivo by interacting with calcineurin subunit A via its C-terminal 140–197aa.11 Conversely, NFAT can activate RCAN1 isoform 4 gene expression via several responsive elements in the promoter region of −350–166 bp,12, 13 thus forming a negative feedback loop. Recent studies demonstrated involvement of RCAN1 in cancer. RCAN1 attenuates endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis.13 In the transgenic mouse model of xenografted tumors, overexpressing RCAN1 gives rise to a broad cancer protection via suppressing tumor angiogenesis by inhibiting the calcineurin pathway in the vascular endothelium.14 A single extra copy of RCAN1 is sufficient to suppress tumor angiogenesis in mice.15 Coincidently, the incidence of many cancer types, such as solid tumors, is obviously reduced in Down's syndrome patients.16 Our recent reports showed overexpression of RCAN1 induced neuronal apoptosis.17 Though we recently showed NF-κB signaling regulated RCAN1 isoform 4 gene transcription through a NF-κB responsive element in the region of −576–554 bp,18 it is unknown if RCAN1 can conversely affect NF-κB signaling activity. We were interested to know if RCAN1 can affect NF-κB signaling and subsequent tumorigenesis.
In the present study, we have solid data to show that RCAN1 inhibited NF-κB signaling activity. The underlying mechanism is that RCAN1 interacted with IκBα and affected its Y42 phosphorylation. Overexpression of RCAN1 by adenovirus in vitro markedly reduced lymphoma Raji cell viability via activation of caspases. Overexpression of RCAN1 by adenovirus in vivo suppressed xenografted tumor growth in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse model. The inhibition of NF-κB activity was mediated by N terminus of RCAN1 (1–103aa), which is distinct from its C terminus (140–197aa) inhibition on calcineurin. Our studies provided a novel therapeutic pathway for lymphoma by activating RCAN1 to inhibit NF-κB signaling.
Results
RCAN1 inhibited NF-κB signaling pathway
To investigate whether RCAN1 has an effect on NF-κB activity, RCAN1 expression plasmids pRCAN1.1mychis and pRCAN1.4-mychis were co-transfected with reporter pNF-κBLuc into HEK293 cells. Dual luciferase assay showed that overexpression of RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 reduced NF-κB luciferase reporter activity to 49.25±0.50% (P<0.0001) and 62.46±4.03% (P=0.0017) relative to controls, respectively, (lanes 2 and 3 compared with lane 1 of Figure 1a). In the si-RCAN1 (pSuper-RCAN1) transfected cells, luciferase assay showed that NF-κB activity was significantly increased to 171.4±14.28% of si-control (lane 5 compared with lane 4 of Figure 1a, P=0.0095).
To investigate if RCAN1 affected NF-κB expression, total levels of NF-κB/p65 were detected in cells overexpressing RCAN1. The results showed that RCAN1 increased total NF-κB/p65 expression (Figures 1b and c), precluding its effect on total levels of NF-κB. NF-κB activity is mainly controlled by its nuclear translocation. To examine if RCAN1 affected NF-κB translocation, nuclear proteins were extracted, and NF-κB/p65 western blot showed that RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 significantly reduced the nuclear NF-κB/p65 to 34.91±0.28% and 38.4±1.16%, respectively, compared with controls (lanes 2 and 3 compared with lane 1 of Figures 1d–f, P<0.0001). The increase of NF-κB/p65 in cytosol corresponded to the decrease in nucleus fraction, indicating the decrease of NF-κB translocation in RCAN1 transfected cells.
To further confirm the effect of RCAN1 in NF-κB signaling, a pSuper-based shRNA plasmid (si-RCAN1) was used to knockdown expression of RCAN1 (Figures 1g and h). Knockdown of RCAN1 increased NF-κB/p65 levels in the nucleus by 199.6±1.28% (Figures 1i and j, P<0.0001).
To further determine the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB affected by RCAN1, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed using a 20-bp double-strand IRDye 800-labeled consensus NF-κB/p65 oligonucleotide (Lincoln, NE, USA) as the probe. As shown in Figure 1k, the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB was elevated in cells with RCAN1 knockdown (144.3±0.03% relative to control) and reduced in cells transfected with RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 (69.03±0.04% and 48.53 ±0.02%, respectively, relative to control) (Figures 1k and l). These results clearly indicate that RCAN1 can inhibit the transcriptional activity of NF-κB.
RCAN1 increased the endogenous IκBα levels
As the activity of NF-κB signaling was mainly regulated by IKB, endogenous IκBα levels were detected in cells overexpressing RCAN1. The plasmids pRCAN1.1-6myc and pRCAN1.4-6myc were transfected into HEK293 cells. Western blot showed that endogenous IκBα levels were increased to 212.2±2.19% and 183.2±2.20% in cells overexpressing RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4, respectively (Figures 2a and b, P<0.0001), while knockdown of RCAN1 decreased IκBα level to 55.44±4.19% (Figures 2c and d, P=0.0006).
Both the serine phosphorylation at 32 and 36 residues (mainly phosphorylated by IKK) and tyrosine phosphorylation at residue 42 will affect the degradation of IκBα and NF-κB activity.7, 9 To further examine which phosphorylation sites were involved, IKK inhibitor Bay 11-7085 and tyrosine kinase inhibitor Genistein were added to HEK293 cells transfected with si-RCAN1 and pNF-κBluc. Figure 2e clearly showed that inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation by Genistein reduced NF-κB activity (121.9±12.88% compared with 478.6±46.66%, P=0.0002, Figure 2e, lane 5 compared with lane 4), while inhibition of serine phosphorylation by IKK inhibitor Bay 11-7085 did not (Figure 2e, lane 6 compared with lane 4). To further exclude the effects on S32/36 phosphorylation, Raji cells were treated with TNFα to induce phosphorylation of IκBα at Ser32/36. IκBα-S32/36 phosphorylation antibody showed increased IκBα-S32/36 phosphorylation after TNFα treatment; however, RCAN1 expression did not affect the IκBα-S32/36 phosphorylation (Figures 2f and g). These results suggest that RCAN1 affected NF-κB activity by affecting the tyrosine phosphorylation of IκBα, which subsequently affected the NF-κB activity.
RCAN1 effected on phosphorylation of IκBα at tyrosine 42
It was previously reported that oxidative stress could activate NF-κB through Y42 phosphorylation of IκBα via spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK).19, 20 To further confirm the effect of RCAN1 on IκBα Y42 phosphorylation, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used to induce Y42 phosphorylation of IκBα. H2O2 induced the degradation of endogenous IκBα in a time-dependent manner (left panel of Figures 3a and b); in contrast, RCAN1 expression greatly increased IκBα levels, particularly at 10, 20 and 30 min after H2O2 addition (right panel of Figures 3a and b). Consistent with this, RCAN1 knockdown decreased IκBα levels after addition of H2O2 at 10 and 20 min compared with control (Figures 3c and d). The effect of H2O2 on endogenous IκBα degradation is strictly dependent on time, in that the effect is most obvious at 20 min (Figures 3a and c).
To further confirm that the effect of RCAN1 was through the Y42 phosphorylation of IκBα, the IκBα phospho-Y42 antibody (Bioworld Tech, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) was used to immunoprecipitation (IP) and anti-IκBα was used in immunoblotting. The results showed knockdown of RCAN1 increased the ratio of Y42 phosphorylated IκBα (Figure 3e) and RCAN1 expression decreased the Y42 phosphorylated IκBα (Figure 3f). These results demonstrated that RCAN1 inhibited NF-κB signaling by interacting with IκBα and affecting its phosphorylation at Y42.
To further confirm the effect of RCAN1 is through the Y42 residue of IκBα, two mutant IκBα, IκBα-Y42E and IκBα-Y42F, were constructed and co-transfected with RCAN1. Compared with the increase of IκBα-WT by RCAN1 expression after addition of H2O2 (Figures 3g and h), mutation of Y42 residue abolished the increasing effects of RCAN1 on IκBα (Figures 3i and j). The weak bands in IκBα-Y42E indicated a faster degradation compared with IκBα-Y42F (Figures 3i and j), suggesting that the Y42 phosphorylation can lead to its degradation. Proteasome inhibitor lactacystin ((lac) was used to stabilize and visualize the IκBα-Y42E expression. Plasmids pIκBα-Y42E/F were transfected into HEK293 cells and 0.5 μM lac was added to the cells after 48 h transfection. About 4 h after lac was added, the cells were chased with 50 ng/ml cycloheximide. IκBα-Y42E turnover rate was much faster than the Y42F mutant (Figures 3k and l), suggesting the Y42 phosphorylation indeed affected the IκBα stability. These results demonstrated that RCAN1 could affect Y42 phosphorylation and subsequently IκBα protein stability.
RCAN1 decreased cell viability in lymphoma Raji cell lines
NF-κB is the major survival factor in cells and constitutively activated NF-κB has been observed in various lymphomas. To investigate if the NF-κB inhibition by RCAN1 will affect cell viability, lymphoma Raji cells were infected with adenovirus expressing RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 (Figure 4a). Ad-RCAN1.1 and Ad-RCAN1.4 markedly decreased cell viability in 3, 4 and 5 days after adenovirus infection (Figure 4b, P<0.0001). The potent NF-κB activation inhibitor (Calbiochem, #481412, Beijing, China) was used as positive controls (Figure 4b, P<0.0001). The effects of RCAN1 overexpression on cell viability were comparable to 100 nM NF-κB activation inhibitor and much better than 10 nM inhibitor. Concurrently, RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 increased the level of IκBα in Raji cells to 196.9±8.14% (P=0.0011) and 282.0±7.46% (P<0.0001), respectively (Figures 4c and d). The decrease of cell viability detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) can be either due to increased cell death or cell cycle arrest. The flow cytometry test of cell cycle showed RCAN1 had no effect on cell cycle. We previously showed RCAN1 expression induced neuronal apoptosis. To elucidate if RCAN1 can induce Raji cell apoptosis, caspase-3/7 activity was examined in Raji cells infected with RCAN1 adenovirus. The caspase-3/7 activity assay showed RCAN1 increased caspase-3/7 activity in Raji cells (Figure 4e, P<0.01). Activation of caspase-3 can also be indicated by its cleavage from 32 to 17 kD. RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 increased the level of cleaved caspase-3 in Raji cells to 202.24±6.08% (P=0.0004) and 159.2±4.36% (P=0.0021), respectively, (Figures 4f and g). Furthermore, the flow cytometry of Annexin V also showed that RCAN1 increased Raji cell apoptosis to 246.6±1.19% (P<0.0001) and 142.5±0.78% (P=0.0008) (Figures 4h and i). These data suggest that RCAN1 induced the apoptosis of Raji cells via inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway.
RCAN1 suppressed the growth of lymphoma xenografts in SCID mice
To further confirm that RCAN1 inhibited NF-κB signaling in vivo, Raji cells infected with RCAN1.1 or GFP adenovirus were s.c. injected into SCID mice. Lymphoma formation was observed ~2 weeks after Raji cells transplantation. The tumor occurrence time was delayed in the RCAN1.1 group compared with GFP control group (Figure 5a). Furthermore, the tumor volumes were also smaller in RCAN1.1 group compared with GFP controls (Figure 5b, P=0.0008). About 80% (8/10) of mice for each group had tumors formed after 38 days post transplantation. The experiment was ended 42 days after transplantation. The tumors were dissected and the endogenous IκBα levels were examined in tumor homogenates. Western blot using the tumor tissues showed IκBα was significantly elevated in the RCAN1.1 group (Figures 5c and d, P=0.0013). The log rank test showed that the tumor growth in RCAN1 overexpressed group is slower than the control (Figure 5e, P=0.015). The results indicated that RCAN1 reduced the incidence, as well as the growth of lymphoma xenografts in mice.
RCAN1 N-terminal domain 1–103aa directly interacted with IκBα
To investigate if there is an interaction between RCAN1 and IκBα, a co-IP assay was performed. HEK293 cells were transfected with pRCAN1.1-6myc. Anti-myc (9E10) was used to pull down RCAN1. Our results showed that anti-IκBα detected a band in 9E10 IPs that migrated together with IκBα protein in the cell lysate (Figure 6a). And, vice versa, the 9E10 antibody detected RCAN1 protein in the anti-IκBα antibody pull down (Figure 6b). The endogenous RCAN1 and IκBα interaction was also confirmed by Co-IP using DCT3 antibody,17 targeting the RCAN1 C terminus (Figure 6c). These results indicated that there is a direct interaction between RCAN1 and IκBα proteins.
To further elucidate the domain of RCAN1 interacting with IκBα, a series of deletion mutants was constructed. Co-IP assay showed that only 1–103aa from N terminus of RCAN1.1 can interact with IκBα, while 51–103aa, 51–172aa, 141–172aa and 141–197aa did not interact with IκBα (Figure 6d). Luciferase assay also confirmed that the 1–103aa of RCAN1.1 inhibited NF-κB activity (lane 3 of Figure 6e, P<0.0001), similarly with the RCAN1 full-length (lane 2 of Figure 6e). While the deletion constructs of 141–172aa and 141–197aa did not inhibit the NF-κB activity (lane 4 and 5 of Figure 6e). Furthermore, the RCAN1 N terminus 1–103aa also reduced cell viability measured with CCK8 assay (83.51±0.0152% of control, Figure 6f, P<0.0001). These results verified that RCAN1 N terminus (1–103aa) can inhibit NF-κB via its physical interaction with IκBα.
Inhibition of NF-κB by RCAN1 was independent of its inhibition on calcineurin
RCAN1 is previously known to be an inhibitory regulator of calcineurin. Knockdown of RCAN1 would increase calcineurin activity, in that calcineurin overexpression and knockdown of RCAN1 would show similar effects if inhibition of NF-κB by RCAN1 was through its regulation of calcineurin. To investigate whether the inhibition of NF-κB by RCAN1 is associated with calcineurin, the calcineurin expression plasmid and si-RCAN1 were co-transfected with pNF-κBluc or pNFATluc reporter into HEK293 cells. Luciferase assay showed overexpression of calcineurin or knockdown of RCAN1 increased luciferase activity of NFATluc to 149.7±3.35 and 139.3±5.96% relative to control (lanes 4 and 5 of Figure 6g), indicating that RCAN1 regulated NFAT activity by its effect on calcineurin. However, in pNF-κBluc-transfected cells, calcineurin significantly inhibits NF-κB-controlled luciferase activity to 9.51±0.495% (lane 4 of Figure 6h), while knockdown of RCAN1 increased NF-κB luciferase activity to 211.2±20.2% (lane 3 of Figure 6h). The N-terminal domain of RCAN1 1–103aa can inhibit the NF-κB activity (Figure 6e), while it has no effect on NFAT activity (lane 3 of Figure 6g). The opposite effect of calcineurin overexpression and RCAN1 knockdown on NF-κB activity indicate that the inhibition of NF-κB by RCAN1 is independent upon its inhibition of calcineurin, the former is related to the N terminus (1–103aa) and the latter is associated with its C terminus (140–197aa).11
Discussion
Our study here identified RCAN1 as a novel inhibitor of NF-κB signaling pathway. The underlying mechanism is that N terminus 1–103aa of RCAN1 can physically interact with IκBα and affect its Y42 phosphorylation. The RCAN1 overexpression in cells leads to Raji cell death in vitro. And RCAN1 expression in vivo reduced tumor growth in xenografted lymphomas in SCID mice. Sustained activation of NF-κB is prevalent in cell lines and tumor tissue specimens and contributes to malignant progression and therapeutic resistance in most of the major forms of human cancer.21 As a newly approved drug for multiple myeloma, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (VELCADE) can inhibit the degradation of IκBα and subsequently inhibit NF-κB signaling pathway.22 Since NF-κB is a popular cancer drug target, the identification of RCAN1 as an NF-κB inhibitor provides a potential treatment for cancers in which NF-κB signaling is aberrantly activated. Our data here showed that RCAN1 affected IκBα Y42 phosphorylation. Previous reports have shown that RCAN1 overexpression stabilized IκBα23 and deficiency of RCAN1 led to increased NF-κB activity.24, 25 Our study here further provided the molecular mechanism of RCAN1 effect on IκBα Y42 phosphorylation. High glucose and reactive oxygen species have been shown to be able to activate NF-κB signaling via IκBα Y42 phosphorylation by spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK).26 Continuous studies will be needed to elucidate if RCAN1 has interactions with IκBα tyrosine kinases such as SYK.
Single extra transgenic copy of Dscr1 is sufficient to confer significant suppression of tumor growth in mice, and that such resistance has thought to be a consequence of a deficit in tumor angiogenesis arising from suppression of the calcineurin pathway.14, 27 Hence, it is reasonable to speculate that cyclosporin A and FK506 (tacrolimus), immunosuppressive drugs that specifically inhibit calcineurin,28 would also suppress tumor angiogenesis. Surprisingly, numerous clinical studies indicate that a significant increase in cancer incidence is a serious complication of transplant recipients receiving long-term immunosupressive therapy.29 The mechanism behind this increased rate of cancer is not yet understood; however, such studies indicate another oncogenic pathway other than inhibition of calcineurin in which RCAN1 may be involved. RCAN1's inhibition of NF-κB is independent of its inhibition on calcineurin, thus providing a novel mechanism for tumor suppressive effect of RCAN1. Further, we found that the N terminus of RCAN1 is sufficient in inhibiting the NF-κB signaling and reducing the lymphoma cell viability, while it has no effect on NFAT signaling.
RCAN1 not only can repress NFAT signaling pathway via inhibition of calcineurin,30 but also can be activated by activators of calcineurin–NFAT pathway such as calcium ionophore, VEGF, angiotensin II, TNF-α and so on,12, 13 thereby forming a negative feedback loop in RCAN1 gene regulation. Our recent study showed NF-κB can activate RCAN1 isoform 4 gene promoter through a NF-κB responsive element in the region of −576–554 bp.18 Our study here showed inhibition of NF-κB by RCAN1, thus forming a second negative feedback loop in regulating RCAN1 gene expression by NF-κB. The tight regulation of RCAN1 gene expression by negative feedback loops involving NFAT and NF-κB implies the crucial role of RCAN1 in regulation of cellular functions.
Materials and Methods
Plasmids construction
The plasmids pRCAN1.1-6myc, pRCAN1.4-6myc, pSuper-RCAN1 and pRCAN51-172myc were generated as previously described.31, 32, 33 RCAN1.1 and RCAN1.4 are the two major isoforms of RCAN1, containing exons 1, 5, 6, 7 and exons 4, 5, 6, 7 respectively. RCAN1-103 was PCR amplified with T7 primer and DS103KpnR (5′-ATGGTACCGCTTGTCTGGATTTGGCGGA-3′) from pRCAN1.1mychis and cloned into pRCAN1.1-6myc to make pRCAN 1-103myc. RCAN 51-103 was PCR amplified with RCAN1-51EcorF (5′-GGAATTCCAAACGAGTCAGAATAAA-3′) and DS103KpnR from pRCAN1.1mychis and cloned into pRCAN1.1-6myc to make pRCAN 51-103myc. RCAN141-172 was PCR amplified with primer DS141XhoF (5′- CCGCTCGAGGCCACCATGGGGGAAAAGTATGAATTGC-3′) and RCAN1-KpnR from pRCAN1.1mychis and cloned into pRCAN1.1-6myc to make pRCAN 141-172myc. RCAN141-197 was PCR amplified with DS141XhoF and BGH primers from pRCAN1.1mychis and cloned into pRCAN1.1-6myc to make pRCAN 141-197myc. The fragments of RCAN1.1-GFP and RCAN1.4-GFP were subcloned into shuttle plasmid pHMCMV5 from pRCAN1.1-GFP and pRCAN1.4-GFP using Nhe1 and Not1, and then transferred to adenovirus vector pAd5F35 plasmid to generate pAd-RCAN1.1-GFP and pAd-RCAN1.4-GFP as previously described.34 The IκBα mutant plasmids IκBα-Y42E and IκBα-Y42F were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis.
Generation and purification of recombinant adenovirus
About 5 μg Pac I-digested pAd-RCAN1.1 and pAd-RCAN1.4 were transfected into HEK293 cells using lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 60-mm cell culture plate. Seven days later, cells were harvested and lysed with three consecutive cycles of freezing–thawing in a methanol/dry ice bath. Then 50% of the cell lysates were used to infect HEK293 cells in a 60-mm culture plate. Recombinant adenoviruses were amplified with the re-infection of HEK293 cells twice more.
For the purification of adenovirus, we collected 25 175cm2-culture flasks of adenovirus-affected HEK293 cells. After three freeze–thaw cycles, the supernatants were added into a 50 ml centrifuge tube with 1.33 and 1.45 M cesium chloride. After 1.5 h centrifugation at the speed of 18 000 r.p.m. at 4 °C, the adenoviruses layer was collected and dialyzed against 1 × PBS overnight at 4 °C. The titer of adenovirus was determined directly by GFP expression 48 h after transduction using the limiting dilution method. The titer for Ad-GFP, Ad-RCAN1.1-GFP and Ad- RCAN1.4-GFP was 5.00 × 1013, 7.94 × 1013 and 3.16 × 1013 p.f.u./ml. The lymphoma cell lines were infected with a multiplicity-of-infection of 30. The infection efficiency 48 h after infection is about 80–90% in Raji cells.
Cell culture, cell viability and apoptosis assay
HEK293 cells was cultured as previously described.33 Human BL cell line Raji were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Hyclone, South Logan, UT, USA) medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM glutamine, 10 mM Hepes and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in an incubator containing 5% CO2.
Cell viability was detected with CCK8 (Cat: #C0037, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 10 000 cells were seeded in 96-well cell culture plate and infected with Ad-GFP or Ad-RCAN1.1-GFP for 4 days. Four hours after CCK8 was added, absorbance at 450 nm (ref: 650 nm) was detected with the Thermo Scientific microplate reader Varioskan Flash (Waltham, MA, USA). Caspase-3/7 activity was measured using the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay kit (G8090, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions as previously described.32 The flow cytometry was performed using 7-AAD and Annexin staining kit (eBioscience, Cat: #88-8102), detected by BD FACSAria III cell sorter (San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using BD FACSDiva Software 7.0 (San Jose, CA, USA). TNFα for cell culture was purchased from Life Technologies (#PSC3015, Waltham, MA, USA).
Lymphoma xenograft in SCID mice
SCID mice were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of PEKING University (Beijing, China). Twenty SCID mice at 4 weeks of age were divided into two groups at random. Two million Raji cells were first infected with Ad-GFP and Ad-RCAN1.1-GFP for 48 h before s.c. injection into SCID mice. The body weight and tumor diagrams were recorded every day for 42 days after implantation. The animal studies were performed according to institutional regulations and in facilities approved by the Chinese Council on Animal Care.
Immunobloting and co-IP analysis
Co-IP and IP were performed as described.31 The primary antibodies anti-TBP (T1827) and anti-actin mAb (A2228) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). Anti-p65 (#4764), anti-IκBα (#4814s) and anti-cleaved caspase-3 (#9661) antibody were from Cell Signaling Tech (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-myc (9E10) was from Abcam (Cat: ab32, Mouse monoclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA). Anti-IκBα (phospho-Y42) (Rabbit polyclonal, Cat: BS4736,) and anti-IκBα (phospho-S32/S36) (Rabbit polyclonal, Cat: BS4105) were from Bioworld Tech (St. Louis Park, MN, USA). The PageRuler Prestained Protein Ladder from Thermo Scientific (#26616, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to indicate the target protein. Detection and quantification were performed with the Li-cor Odyssey imaging system and its software (Lincoln, NE, USA).
Dual luciferase assay, nucleus extraction and EMSA
Dual luciferase activity was determined as previously described.35 Nuclear extraction was performed using Nuclear Extraction Kit (Millipore, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. EMSA was performed using the Odyssey Infrared EMSA Kit (LI-COR Biosciences Co., Lincoln, NE, USA). The consensus sequence for the NF-κB probe is 5′-agttgaggggactttcccaggc-3′.
Data analysis
All the experiments were repeated three to five times. For immunoblotting, one representative picture is shown; quantifications were from three to five independent experiments. Values represent mean±S.E.M. The data were evaluated for statistical significance with two-way ANOVA or Student's t-test.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant # 81101796 and 30871387).
Glossary
- NF-κB
nuclear factor-κB
- RCAN1
the regulator of calcineurin 1
- BL
Burkitt's lymphoma
- CCK8
cell counting kit-8
- Co-IP
co-immunoprecipitation
- EMSA
electrophoretic mobility shift assay
- H2O2
hydrogen peroxide
- IκBα
inhibitor of κB
- IKK
Inhibition of IκB kinase
- NFAT
nuclear factor of activated T-cell
- SCID
severe combined immunodeficiency mouse
- SYK
spleen tyrosine kinase
- TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor α
- Y42
tyrosine 42
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by M Diederich
References
- 1Gerondakis S, Grossmann M, Nakamura Y, Pohl T, Grumont R. Genetic approaches in mice to understand Rel/NF-kappaB and IkappaB function: transgenics and knockouts. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6888–6895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2Ben-Neriah Y, Karin M. Inflammation meets cancer, with NF-kappaB as the matchmaker. Nat Immunol 2011; 12: 715–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3Pacifico F, Leonardi A. NF-kappaB in solid tumors. Biochem Pharmacol 2006; 72: 1142–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4Rahal R, Frick M, Romero R, Korn JM, Kridel R, Chan FC et al. Pharmacological and genomic profiling identifies NF-kappaB-targeted treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma. Nat Med 2014; 20: 87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5Nagel D, Vincendeau M, Eitelhuber AC, Krappmann D. Mechanisms and consequences of constitutive NF-kappaB activation in B-cell lymphoid malignancies. Oncogene 2014; 33: 5655–5665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6Tafuku S, Matsuda T, Kawakami H, Tomita M, Yagita H, Mori N. Potential mechanism of resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Burkitt's lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 2006; 76: 64–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7Perkins ND. Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-kappaB and IKK function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8: 49–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8Baldwin AS Jr. The NF-kappa B and I kappa B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu Rev Immunol 1996; 14: 649–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9Imbert V, Rupec RA, Livolsi A, Pahl HL, Traenckner EB, Mueller-Dieckmann C et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of I kappa B-alpha activates NF-kappa B without proteolytic degradation of I kappa B-alpha. Cell 1996; 86: 787–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10Beraud C, Henzel WJ, Baeuerle PA. Involvement of regulatory and catalytic subunits of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in NF-kappaB activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 429–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11Chan B, Greenan G, McKeon F, Ellenberger T. Identification of a peptide fragment of DSCR1 that competitively inhibits calcineurin activity in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 13075–13080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12Stathatos N, Bourdeau I, Espinosa AV, Saji M, Vasko VV, Burman KD et al. KiSS-1/G protein-coupled receptor 54 metastasis suppressor pathway increases myocyte-enriched calcineurin interacting protein 1 expression and chronically inhibits calcineurin activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 5432–5440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13Minami T, Horiuchi K, Miura M, Abid MR, Takabe W, Noguchi N et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor- and thrombin-induced termination factor, Down syndrome critical region-1, attenuates endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 50537–50554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14Baek KH, Zaslavsky A, Lynch RC, Britt C, Okada Y, Siarey RJ et al. Down's syndrome suppression of tumour growth and the role of the calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1. Nature 2009; 459: 1126–1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15Shin J, Lee JC, Baek KH. A single extra copy of Dscr1 improves survival of mice developing spontaneous lung tumors through suppression of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Lett 2014; 342: 70–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16Hasle H, Clemmensen IH, Mikkelsen M. Risks of leukaemia and solid tumours in individuals with Down's syndrome. Lancet 2000; 355: 165–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17Sun X, Wu Y, Chen B, Zhang Z, Zhou W, Tong Y et al. Regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1) facilitates neuronal apoptosis through caspase-3 activation. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 9049–9062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18Zheng L, Liu H, Wang P, Song W, Sun X. Regulator of calcineurin 1 gene transcription is regulated by nuclear factor-kappaB. Curr Alzheimer Res 2014; 11: 156–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19Schoonbroodt S, Ferreira V, Best-Belpomme M, Boelaert JR, Legrand-Poels S, Korner M et al. Crucial role of the amino-terminal tyrosine residue 42 and the carboxyl-terminal PEST domain of I kappa B alpha in NF-kappa B activation by an oxidative stress. J Immunol 2000; 164: 4292–4300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20Takada Y, Mukhopadhyay A, Kundu GC, Mahabeleshwar GH, Singh S, Aggarwal BB. Hydrogen peroxide activates NF-kappa B through tyrosine phosphorylation of I kappa B alpha and serine phosphorylation of p65: evidence for the involvement of I kappa B alpha kinase and Syk protein-tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 24233–24241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21Van Waes C. Nuclear factor-kappaB in development, prevention, and therapy of cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 1076–1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22Bose P, Batalo MS, Holkova B, Grant S. Bortezomib for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Exp Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15: 2443–2459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23Kim YS, Cho KO, Lee HJ, Kim SY, Sato Y, Cho YJ. Down syndrome candidate region 1 increases the stability of the IkappaBalpha protein: implications for its anti-inflammatory effects. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 39051–39061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24Yang YJ, Chen W, Edgar A, Li B, Molkentin JD, Berman JN et al. Rcan1 negatively regulates Fc epsilonRI-mediated signaling and mast cell function. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 195–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25Junkins RD, MacNeil AJ, Wu Z, McCormick C, Lin TJ. Regulator of calcineurin 1 suppresses inflammation during respiratory tract infections. J Immunol 2013; 190: 5178–5186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26Yang WS, Seo JW, Han NJ, Choi J, Lee KU, Ahn H et al. High glucose-induced NF-kappaB activation occurs via tyrosine phosphorylation of IkappaBalpha in human glomerular endothelial cells: involvement of Syk tyrosine kinase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2008; 294: F1065–F1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27Reynolds LE, Watson AR, Baker M, Jones TA, D'Amico G, Robinson SD et al. Tumour angiogenesis is reduced in the Tc1 mouse model of Down's syndrome. Nature 2010; 465: 813–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28Liu J, Farmer JD Jr, Lane WS, Friedman J, Weissman I, Schreiber SL. Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes. Cell 1991; 66: 807–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29Dantal J, Soulillou JP. Immunosuppressive drugs and the risk of cancer after organ transplantation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1371–1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30Arron JR, Winslow MM, Polleri A, Chang CP, Wu H, Gao X et al. NFAT dysregulation by increased dosage of DSCR1 and DYRK1A on chromosome 21. Nature 2006; 441: 595–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31Liu H, Wang P, Song W, Sun X. Degradation of regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1) is mediated by both chaperone-mediated autophagy and ubiquitin proteasome pathways. FASEB J 2009; 23: 3383–3392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32Sun X, Wu Y, Herculano B, Song W. RCAN1 overexpression exacerbates calcium overloading-induced neuronal apoptosis. PloS One 2014; 9: e95471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33Wang T, Liu H, Wang Y, Liu C, Sun X. RCAN1 increases abeta generation by promoting N-glycosylation via oligosaccharyltransferase. Curr Alzheimer Res 2014; 11: 332–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34Sakurai F, Mizuguchi H, Hayakawa T. Efficient gene transfer into human CD34+ cells by an adenovirus type 35 vector. Gene Ther 2003; 10: 1041–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35Sun X, Wang Y, Qing H, Christensen MA, Liu Y, Zhou W et al. Distinct transcriptional regulation and function of the human BACE2 and BACE1 genes. FASEB J 2005; 19: 739–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]