Abstract
In recent years, the advances in stem cell research have suggested that the human body may have a higher plasticity than it was originally expected.
Until now, four categories of stem cells were isolated and cultured in vivo: embryonic stem cells, fetal stem cells, adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs).
Although multiple studies were published, several issues concerning the stem cells are still debated, such as: the molecular mechanisms of differentiation, the methods to prevent teratoma formation or the ethical and religious issues regarding especially the embryonic stem cell research.
The direct differentiation of stem cells into specialized cells: cardiac myocytes, neural cells, pancreatic islets cells, may represent an option in treating incurable diseases such as: neurodegenerative diseases, type I diabetes, hematologic or cardiac diseases.
Nevertheless, stem cell-based therapies, based on stem cell transplantation, remain mainly at the experimental stages and their major limitation is the development of teratoma and cancer after transplantation. The induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) represent a prime candidate for future cell therapy research because of their significant self-renewal and differentiation potential and the lack of ethical issues.
This article presents an overview of the biological advances in the study of stem cells and the current progress made in the field of regenerative medicine.
Keywords: stem cells, cell therapy
Introduction
In the 1960s the Canadian scientists Ernest A. McCulloch and James E. Till laid down the first bricks of the stem cell research foundation by proving the presence of colony-forming cells (now known as hematopoietic stem cells) in the mouse bone marrow [1,2]. Until now, several varieties of stem cells have been isolated and cultured in vitro. Concerning their origin they have been divided in three wide categories: embryonic, fetal, and adult stem cells [3,4,5]. In addition to these, a fourth category was discovered by Shinya Yamanaka in 2007, which made a breakthrough by reprogramming human skin fibroblasts back into pluripotent cells. We call these cells human induced pluripotent stem cells or shortly: hiPSCs. These can differentiate into all three germ layers similarly to the embryonic stem cells, but, unlike the latter, hiPSCs come with significantly less ethical and religious issues, thus greatly simplifying the research work [6]. Consequently, significant advances have been made in the disease modeling field for the simple fact that these hiPSCs offer the possibility to study the physiology of the diseases on models that are the closest to the human reality, also carrying the disease-specific genetic background [7,8]. Along with this, drug testing is getting closer to creating better, more specific, and safer drugs, eventually reaching the ultimate purpose: personalized treatments [9,10].
Since 1960s, numerous articles focusing on stem cells have been published, bringing us closer to a better understanding of their origin, function, morphology, molecular biology and, eventually, therapeutic applications. Regarding the latter, one of the oldest stem cell therapies is transplantation of bone marrow from donor to leukemic patients. Transplantation of umbilical cord cells to patients that suffer from hematological diseases, a more recent method and an alternative to the first, shows long term results similar to the previous, as reported in some studies [11]. Still, nowadays, big hopes are laid in the direct differentiation of stem cells towards specialized cell types such as pancreatic islets cells, neurons and cardiac myocytes [12,13,14]. Reaching this point and successfully transplanting them in the affected organs or tissues might consist in a new approach for treating incurable diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, type I diabetes, and cardiac diseases.
A better mastering of the isolation, differentiation mechanisms, and preventing the stem cells to evolve into teratomas and/or terato-carcinomas are some of the obstacles that have to be overcome in order to use stem cells for therapeutic purposes. In this review we try to bring up to date the biological advances in the study of stem cells as well as the progress made towards using them in the field of cell therapy.
Stem cells are unspecialized cells that present two very important properties: self-renewal and plasticity
Stem cells are unspecialized cells capable to proliferate and differentiate. Consequently to the differentiation they acquire a more specialized phenotype by adopting a specific genetic expression profile. In the end they become specialized cells that present characteristic properties [12,13,14]. A good example is the embryonic stem cell which is capable to differentiate not only into all three embryonic germ layers (endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm) but also in the embryonic annexes (e.g. placenta, amniotic membranes etc), eventually leading to the possibility to obtain any of the more than 220 cell types found in the human organism. Therefore, we say that the embryonic stem cell at morula stage is totipotent [4]. Following the process of ontogenesis, stem cells can be found at any stage of development. Indeed, studies show that fetal stem cells can be isolated and show promising applications in perinatal and regenerative medicine [15,16,17]. Moreover, nowadays, several types of adult stem cells can be obtained not only from bone marrow but also from adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, myocardium and pancreas [5]. The typical example of adult stem cells are the hematopoietic stem cells that can differentiate into cells that carry specific functions such as antigen synthesis, transport of gases and other [18]. In addition, these are also frequently used for therapeutic purposes in patients suffering from leukemia [19].
For a cell to be categorized as a stem cell two very important conditions must be fulfilled. First, the cell must have the property of self-renewal [20]. This means that it has the ability to preserve its undifferentiated status even after numerous cycles of cell division. For this to be possible stem cells undergo a special type of division called asymmetric division. As it follows, one of the resulted cells will be identical to the mother cell, maintaining the pool of stem cells, whereas the second will undergo differentiation becoming, eventually, a specialized cell. Transcription factors that play a key role in the molecular mechanisms of this process are: SOX2, NOTCH, WNT, PTEN, p53, Myc, as well as the ones from the HOX group (4, 7, 9, and 10), and Musashi-1 [21,22].
The other important property that defines the stem cell phenotype is plasticity. This makes reference to the capacity of cells to differentiate by adopting a genetic expression profile that will eventually lead towards a specific cell phenotype. Generally, the more undifferentiated the stem cell, the broader the specter of differentiation. Consequently, according to their ability to differentiate into wider panels of specialized cells, stem cells are sorted into 4 classes, as shown bellow [23].
Totipotent stem cells are present in the zygote until it achieves the conformation of 8 cells. They can differentiate into cells that result from all three germ layers including placental cells. Unspecialized cells, they can undergo symmetric and asymmetric division and exhibit phenotypic and molecular specific markers such as Oct 3/4, Nanog, SEEA1, SEEA 3 and 4. They present a great proliferative capacity producing embryoid bodies, but also teratomas and/or teratocarcinomas.
Pluripotent stem cells can be isolated from the internal mass of the blastocyst. Undergoing differentiation they can form cells from all three germ layers (endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm) but lack the ability to form placental or extra-embryonic cells.
Multipotent stem cells are found in fetal organisms in the process of evolution but also in the adult organisms. They can differentiate into a limited number of cells restricted to a certain germinal layer.
Unipotent stem cells differentiate resulting in a single type of cell and are found in the adult organisms. [24]
Sources of stem cells and their applications
As already mentioned, several varieties of stem cells have already been successfully isolated and cultured in vitro. Nowadays, they are grouped in four broad categories: embryonic stem cells, fetal stem cells, adult stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells. In the following we will discuss each one of these categories bringing up to date their effective applications and future prospects.
1. Embryonic stem cells
1.1. Properties
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were first isolated from inner cell mass of the blastocyst by Thomson et al. in 1998 [3]. In addition, more recent studies show that morulae and single blastomeres may constitute alternative sources of hESCs [25,26]. Classically, the characteristic cell surface markers expressed by hESCs are stage-specific embryonic antigen-3 (SSEA-3), SSEA-4, tumor rejection antigen-1-60 (TRA-1-60), TRA-1-81, and alkaline phosphatase [3]. Also, there are studies that propose a range of cell surface proteins as novel cell markers for a better delimitation and isolation of hESCs. Regarding these, CD9, CD30, CD50, CD90, and CD200s in combination with SSEA-5 showed promising results in sorting undifferentiated hESCs from a pool of cells that were committed towards a neural-directed differentiation. The results showed a remarkable reduction in teratoma formation [27]. Besides the specific cell surface markers, a series of genes are also used to detect uncommitted hESCs, being more expressed at that stage. From these, NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 are the three typically transcription factors used to demonstrate the pluripotency of the cells. Additionally, a range of genes consisting in Rex-1, Dnmt3b, Lin-28, Tdgf1, FoxD3, Tert, Utf-1, Gal, Cx43, Gdf3, Gtcm1, Terf1, Terf2, Lefty A, and Lefty B are also commonly used for the same purpose [28,29].
The capacity of differentiation towards all three germ layers brings a series of advantages such as applications in regenerative medicine. We will thoroughly discuss this in the following section. A major drawback for using the hESCs though, is the great deal of ethical and religious issues they come along with, the embryo being destroyed upon their isolation.
1.2. Applications of hESCs
Attempts in obtaining myogenic progenitors date back from 2006 when a group successfully obtained myogenic cells from mouse skeletal muscle. Using a technique initially utilized for obtaining neurogenic progenitors, they reported the presence of non-adherent microspheres capable to maintain their abilities to proliferate and differentiate for at least several months. Notably, they were also capable to participate in muscle regeneration. Interestingly, after initializing differentiation, instead of obtaining multinucleated cells they observed the presence of thin mononucleated and elongated myosin- and myogenin-positive cells that presented spontaneous contractility and cell surface adherence, suggesting a very primitive phenotype [30]. A more recent study, this time using hESCs in a sphere-based culture, reported positive results in the propagation of human myogenic progenitors. Even so, the inability to maintain their proliferative ability for longer than 12 weeks and exhibiting a slight heterogeneity with the presence of neural progenitors shows that this method requires further optimization [31]. This may bring valuable insights on the mechanisms in muscle tissue development, growth factors and drug discovery, toxicology, and regenerative medicine.
In 2009, the Geron Company received the FDA authorization to use and differentiate embryonic stem cells into oligodendrocytes. The latter were then used in phase 1 trials for treating acute spinal cord injuries. Even though the results were promising the study was discontinued in 2012 due to financial reasons.
In 2010 two other trials were approved for the company called Advanced Cell Technology. Their purpose was to improve the sight of patients suffering from Stargardt macular dystrophy and dry age-related macular degeneration. For this, they used retinal pigmented cells obtained from hESC. The preliminary results show no recordings of tumors or ectopic tissue. Also, no reject phenomena were registered. Nowadays there are 6 clinical trials all of them sharing the purpose of treating Stargardt macular dystrophy and dry age-related macular degeneration.
1.3. Future prospects of hESCs
Regarding the therapeutic use of hESCs, theoretically they can be differentiated into any type of cell that forms the organism. At the moment, the lack of knowledge concerning their biology is a limiting factor that decreases the potential of their use. Another drawback that presents a high risk for using them in the clinical practice is the generation of teratomas and teratocarcinomas. Due to their high plasticity it is necessary to establish standardized protocols of differentiation, more accurate and reproducible.
2. Fetal stem cells
2.1. Properties
As hESCs come with a great deal of ethical and religious issues another valuable source of stem cells is represented by the fetal tissues samples [32,33] or, after birth, by the fetal adnexa such as fetal membranes and placenta [34].
Antenatal sources of stem cells (SCs) include fetal blood from umbilical cord and amniotic fluid. From the first, it is possible to isolate fetal hematopoietic stem cells (fHSCs) as well as fetal mesenchymal (fMSCs), the latter in a much lower quantity, about 0.4% in the first trimester presenting a decreasing trend with the gestation advance [4]. Fetal bone marrow, liver, kidney, lungs and also umbilical cord constitute other sources of fMSCs [33,35,36]. fHSCs express CD34 and can differentiate towards all hematopoietic lineages, whereas fMSCs express intracelular markers such as fibronectin, laminin, vimentin and mesenchymal markers, like CD105, CD73, CD45, CD34, CD14 and can differentiate in cells from adipose, cartilage and bone tissues but also towards cardiac muscle and neuron cells [37]. From the amniotic fluid it is possible to isolate stem cells that come from connective tissue and dermal fibroblasts. They share markers and properties with the MSCs and therefore are called amniotic-fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AF-MSCs) [4].
Postnatal sources of stem cells can be found in the structures that form the placenta. Even though their number decreases along the gestation they still remain more numerous than the adult stem cells after isolation. As it follows, four distinct types of cells regarding their site of origin have been obtained from the structures that form the placenta: human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs), human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells (hAMSCs), human chorionic mesenchymal stromal cells (hCMSCs), and human chorionic trofoblastic cells (hCTCs) [38].
HAECs express low amount of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type A,B,C a very important aspect in the possibility of their transplantation between different individuals. Moreover, they have been shown to exhibit other cell surface markers like ABCG2/BCRP, CD9, CD24, E-cadherin, integrins alfa6 and beta1, c-met, SSEA 3 and 4, TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81. However, the surface markers that are missing or are expressed in low quantities are SSEA-1, CD34, CD133, CD117 (c-kit) and CCR4 (CC chemokine receptor) [39]. As molecular markers they express Oct 3/4, Sox-2, and Nanog. Studies show that hAECs can differentiate towards all three germ layers, thus they are pluripotent [40].
Cells isolated from the mesenchymal compartment (hAMSCs and hCMSCs) exhibit markers similar to those found in the stem cells isolated from the bone marrow, except for the hematopoietic markers CD34 and CD45 and the monocytic marker CD14. The presence of SSEA-3 and SSEA-4 has been shown through mARN analysis. Very interesting, they express low levels of HLA-ABC and no HLA-DR [41].
2.2. Applications
Concerning the fHSCs, the most used source, by far, resides in the blood from the ombilical cord. It is also the oldest source of stem cells used in the clinical practice, the first transplant being successfully carried out in a patient with Fanconi anemia 27 years ago. This kind of treatment is used in patients who suffer from malignant hemopathies or metabolic storage disease that can benefit of allogenic transplant of hematopoietic stem cells [42,43]. At the moment, there are 600.000 units stored and more than 30.000 performed transplants. Since 2007 to date there have been a number of 11 ongoing trials, the majority of them in the field of neuropathology (amiotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, cerebral atrophy, Huntington’s disease and Parkinson’s disease) [44].
2.3. Future prospects
Stem cells obtained from the umbilical cord will be used in treating different hematological pathologies in the future. Moreover, the ongoing clinical trials will bring new data regarding the cellular therapy of neurologic diseases. Similarly to hESCs, the hFSCs come with a still insufficiently exploited potential. Their low HLA level as well as the particular immunosuppressant properties they exhibit makes them the ideal candidate for cellular therapy. Unlike the hESCs, they come with little ethical issues.
3. Adult stem cells
3.1. Properties
Just as fetal stem cells, adult stem cells come with little ethical or religious issues since they are harvested from adult organisms. The typical adult stem cell is the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) first isolated from mouse bone marrow in 1961 by Ernest A. McCulloch and James E. Till, under the name of spleen-colony forming units (CFU-S) [1,2]. Later, in 1982, Friedenshtein isolated and described another group of cells, also located in the bone marrow, that presented stem cell characteristics, but exhibiting a wider panel of differentiation than HSCs. They were called colony forming units-fibroblasts (CFU-F), now known as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [5].
Bone marrow and peripheral blood are viable sources of HSCs [45,46]. The typical cell surface markers expressed in HSCs are CD34, CD 90 and CD133, while they lack expression of CD38 [47,48,49]. Also, studies show that kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) and cub domain protein 1 (CDP1) positive cells in the CD34 + fraction show enrichment of the primitive HSCs [50,51]. In addition to these, other markers such as CD49f and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) are debated and proposed as new HSCs specific markers in a review from 2013 [27]. HSCs possess the capacity to differentiate towards all cells that form the hematopoietic system.
MSCs are adult multipotent SCs that can be isolated not only from bone marrow stroma [52], but also from other tissues such as adipose tissue [53], neural tissue [54], olfactory mucosa [55.], heart tissue [56], skin [57], gingiva [58], and many others. Classically, MSCs exhibit CD105, CD73 and CD90 as specific cell surface markers and lack expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79alpha or CD19 and HLA-DR surface molecules. Also, MSCs have the ability to differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondroblasts [59]. Moreover, studies show that they can also differentiate into non-mesenchymal cells such as pancreatic islets [57], neuron-like cells [55], and hepatocytes [60].
3.2. Applications
The hematopoietic stem cells are the only adult stem cells currently used for bone marrow transplants in patients who suffer from different types of malignant hemopathies. Also, there are two trials approved by Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) regarding the use of neural stem cells in patients that suffer from Parkinson’s disease and spinal cord injury [61,62]. Likewise, the use of stem cells obtained from the marrow is in an advanced phase in treating the pulmonary pathology related to premature births.
3.3. Future prospects
The understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control the phenotype of the stem cells has revolutionized the field of biology. However, our knowledge is still extremely limited, which leads to a low level of their use in the clinical practice. Finding new markers that may sort the different populations of stem cells into classes as well as the identification of new mechanisms involved in cellular differentiation (e.g. microRNA, lncRNA) will broaden the specter of opportunities in the medicine of the future.
4. Human iPS cells
4.1. Properties
In 2007 Yamanaka was the first to succeed in reprogramming human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) back into pluripotent stem cells through viral transduction of human Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM cocktail) genes. Moreover, he also managed to reprogram human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (HFLS) obtaining similar results [6]. Using Oct3/4, Sox2, Nanog, and Lin28, Thomson managed to induce pluripotent cells from somatic cells, thus proving true the concept Yamanaka had stated [63]. Both of them being invasive, studies have shown that it is possible to obtain hiPSCs even from urine cells, avoiding scar and bleeding, allowing sampling cells even from patients that suffer from hemophilia [64]. Theoretically, any type of somatic cells can be reprogrammed, eventually generating induced pluripotent stem cells [65].
HiPSCs express cell surface markers specific for hESCs such as SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-8, alkaline phosphatase, and Nanog protein. Moreover, they express OCT3/4, SOX2, NANOG, growth and differentiation factor 3 (GDF3), reduced expression 1 (REX1), fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF4), embryonic cell-specific gene 1 (ESG1), developmental pluripotency-associated 2 (DPPA2), DPPA4, and telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) at levels similar to those found in hESCs [6].
HiPSCs are pluripotent stem cells retaining the capacity to differentiate into cells that originate from all three germ layers. As it follows, studies show that cardiac myocytes [66], neural cells [67], hepatocytes [64], pancreatic islets [68], and many others have been obtained through direct differentiation of hiPSCs.
4.2. Applications
One of the purposes of regenerative medicine is the generation of specialized cells for every individual patient. The achievement of this type of cells brings new opportunities in the fields of disease modeling and drug testing. Some examples that are currently under evaluation are familial dysautonomia [69], prolonged QT interval [70,71], and dyskeratosis congenita. At the moment, their use in the clinical practice still remains a desire. However, Jaenisch et al managed to prove the utility of these cells on two murine models, one with sickle cells disease [72], and the other, with Parkinson disease [73], respectively.
4.3. Future prospects
These cells hide an immense potential for future use. Lacking any ethical issues, researchers can generate personalized lines of cells from which it will be possible to obtain differentiated cells. The latter could be used in treating diseases that are now considered incurable. The neurodegenerative diseases are one of the most studied at the present time and as examples stand Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Fronto-Temporal Dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease [74]. Also, the cardiac and metabolic conditions are worth mentioning [75]. The use of these cells in the future clinical practice will truly open the path towards personalized medicine.
Acknowledgement
This paper was published under the frame of European Social Fund, Human Resources Development Operational Programme 2007–2013, Project number POSDRU 159/1.5/138776.
References
- 1.Becker AJ, McCulloch EA, Till JE. Cytological demonstration of the clonal nature of spleen colonies derived from transplanted mouse marrow cells. Nature. 1963;197:452–454. doi: 10.1038/197452a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siminovitch L, McCulloch EA, Till JE. The distribution of colony-forming cells among spleen colonies. J Cell Physiol. 1963;62:327–336. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030620313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gucciardo L, Lories R, Ochsenbein-Kölble N, Done’ E, Zwijsen A, Deprest J. Fetal mesenchymal stem cells: isolation, properties and potential use in perinatology and regenerative medicine. BJOG. 2009;116(2):166–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Latsinik NV, Sidorovich SIu, Fridenshteĭn AIa. Effect of bone marrow trypsinization on the efficiency of fibroblast colony formation in monolayer cultures. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1981;92(9):356–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rashid ST, Corbineau S, Hannan N, Marciniak SJ, Miranda E, Alexander G, et al. Modeling inherited metabolic disorders of the liver using human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(9):3127–3136. doi: 10.1172/JCI43122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma Z, Koo S, Finnegan MA, Loskill P, Huebsch N, Marks NC, et al. Three-dimensional filamentous human diseased cardiac tissue model. Biomaterials. 2014;35(5):1367–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Soragni E, Miao W, Iudicello M, Jacoby D, De Mercanti S, Clerico M, et al. Epigenetic therapy for Friedreich ataxia. Ann Neurol. 2014;76(4):489–508. doi: 10.1002/ana.24260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang J, Qu J, Wang J. Patch clamp apply in cardiomyocytes derived from patient’s iPS cells for individual anticancer therapy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(11):4475–4478. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barker JN, Wagner JE. Umbilical-cord blood transplantation for the treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(7):526–532. doi: 10.1038/nrc1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kattman SJ, Witty AD, Gagliardi M, Dubois NC, Niapour M, Hotta A, et al. Stage-specific optimization of activin/nodal and BMP signaling promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell lines. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8(2):228–240. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Konagaya S, Iwata H. Microencapsulation of dopamine neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1850(1):22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sui L, Geens M, Sermon K, Bouwens L, Mfopou JK. Role of BMP signaling in pancreatic progenitor differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2013;9(5):569–577. doi: 10.1007/s12015-013-9435-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kunisaki SM, Fuchs JR, Kaviani A, Oh JT, LaVan DA, Vacanti JP, et al. Diaphragmatic repair through fetal tissue engineering: a comparison between mesenchymal amniocyte-and myoblast-based constructs. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(1):34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pan HC, Yang DY, Chiu YT, Lai SZ, Wang YC, Chang MH, et al. Enhanced regeneration in injured sciatic nerve by human amniotic mesenchymal stem cell. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13(5):570–575. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang DY, Sheu ML, Su HL, Cheng FC, Chen YJ, Chen CJ, et al. Dual regeneration of muscle and nerve by intravenous administration of human amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells regulated by stromal cell-derived factor-1α in a sciatic nerve injury model. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(6):1357–1367. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.JNS111360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bongso A, Lee EH, editors. Stem cells: From Bench to Bedside. 1st ed. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Killick S, Matutes E, Powles RL, Min T, Treleaven JG, Rege KP, et al. Acute erythroid leukemia (M6): outcome of bone marrow transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999;35(1–2):99–107. doi: 10.3109/10428199909145709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen S, Do JT, Zhang Q, Yao S, Yan F, Peters EC, et al. Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by a small molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(46):17266–17271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608156103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Olsson E, Honeth G, Bendhal PO, Saal LH, Gruvberger-Saal S, Ringner M, et al. CD44 isoforms are heterogeneously expressed in breast cancer and correlate with tumor subtypes and cancer stem cell markers. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:418. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Okano H, Kawahara H, Toriya M, Nakao K, Shibata S, Imai T. Function of RNA-binding protein Musashi-1 in stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 2005;306(2):349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Scheel C, Weinberg RA. Phenotypic plasticity and epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in cancer and normal stem cells? Int J Cancer. 2011;129(10):2310–2314. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bernemann C, Greber B, Ko K, Sterneckert J, Han DW, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, et al. Distinct developmental ground states of epiblast stem cell lines determine different pluripotency features. Stem Cells. 2011;29(10):1496–1503. doi: 10.1002/stem.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Strelchenko N, Verlinsky O, Kukharenko V, Verlinsky Y. Morula-derived human embryonic stem cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(6):623–629. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61772-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Klimanskaya I, Chung Y, Becker S, Lu SJ, Lanza R. Derivation of human embryonic stem cells from single blastomeres. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(8):1963–1972. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang C, Lee AS, Volkmer J-P, Sahoo D, Nag D, Mosley AR, et al. SSEA-5, an antibody defining a novel surface glycan on human pluripotent stem cells and its application to remove teratoma-forming cells as part of a surface antibody panel. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(9):829–834. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Calloni R, Cordero EA, Henriques JA, Bonatto D. Reviewing and updating the major molecular markers for stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22(9):1455–1476. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Skottman H, Mikkola M, Lundin K, Olsson C, Strömberg AM, Tuuri T, et al. Gene expression signatures of seven individual human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells. 2005;23(9):1343–1356. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sarig R, Baruchi Z, Fuchs O, Nudel U, Yaffe D. Regeneration and transdifferentiation potential of muscle-derived stem cells propagated as myospheres. Stem Cells. 2006;24(7):1769–1778. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hosoyama T, McGivern JV, Van Dyke JM, Ebert AD, Suzuki M. Derivation of myogenic progenitors directly from human pluripotent stem cells using a sphere-based culture. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(5):564–574. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsai MS, Lee JL, Chang YJ, Hwang SM. Isolation of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from second-trimester amniotic fluid using a novel two-stage culture protocol. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1450–1456. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Campagnoli C, Roberts IA, Kumar S, Bennett PR, Bellantuono I, Fisk NM. Identification of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human first-trimester fetal blood, liver, and bone marrow. Blood. 2001;98:2396–2402. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.8.2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.In ‘t Anker PS, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C, de Groot-Swings GM, Claas FH, Fibbe WE, et al. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells of fetal or maternal origin from human placenta. Stem Cells. 2004;22:1338–1345. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.In ’t Anker PS, Noort WA, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C, Kruisselbrink AB, van Bezooijen RL, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in human second-trimester bone marrow, liver, lung, and spleen exhibit a similar immunophenotype but a heterogeneous multilineage differentiation potential. Haematologica. 2003;88:845–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Almeida-Porada G, El Shabrawy D, Porada C, Zanjani ED. Differentiative potential of human metanephric mesenchymal cells. Exp Hematol. 2002;30:1454–1462. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00967-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.O’Donoghue K, Fisk NM. Fetal stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18(6):853–875. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant MF, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 20th ed. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange; 1997. The placenta and fetal membranes; pp. 95–125. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Miki T, Lehmann T, Cai H, Stolz DB, Strom SC. Stem cell characteristics of amniotic epithelial cells. Stem Cells. 2005;23:1549–1559. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Akle CA, Adinolfi M, Welsh KI, Leibowitz S, McColl I. Immunogenicity of human amniotic epithelial cells after transplantation into volunteers. Lancet. 1981;2(8254):1003–1005. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91212-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Thellin O, Coumans B, Zorzi W, Igout A, Heinen E. Tolerance to the foeto-placental ‘graft’: ten ways to support a child for nine months. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000;12:731–737. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(00)00170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Auerbach AD, Liu Q, Ghosh R, Pollack MS, Douglas GW, Broxmeyer HE. Prenatal identification of potential donors for umbilical cord blood transplantation for Fanconi anemia. Transfusion. 1990;30(8):682–687. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30891020324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gluckman E, Devergie A, Dutreix J. Radiosensitivity in Fanconi anaemia: application to the conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol. 1983;54(3):431–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.tb02117.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ballen KK, Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HE. Umbilical cord blood transplantation: the first 25 years and beyond. Blood. 2013;122(4):491–498. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-453175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ribeiro A, Laranjeira P, Mendes S, Velada I, Leite C, Andrade P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord matrix, adipose tissue and bone marrow exhibit different capability to suppress peripheral blood B, natural killer and T cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4(5):125. doi: 10.1186/scrt336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chong PP, Selvaratnam L, Abbas AA, Kamarul T. Human peripheral blood derived mesenchymal stem cells demonstrate similar characteristics and chondrogenic differentiation potential to bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(4):634–642. doi: 10.1002/jor.21556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nielsen JS, McNagny KM. CD34 is a key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell trafficking to bone marrow and mast cell progenitor trafficking in the periphery. Microcirculation. 2009;16(6):487–496. doi: 10.1080/10739680902941737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, Almeida-Porada G, Ogawa M, Leary AG, et al. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 1997;90:5002–5012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hao QL, Shah AJ, Thiemann FT, Smogorzewska EM, Crooks GM. A functional comparison of CD34 + CD38- cells in cord blood and bone marrow. Blood. 1995;86(10):3745–3753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ziegler BL, Valtieri M, Porada GA, De Maria R, Muller R, Masella B, et al. KDR receptor: a key marker defining hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 1999;285:1553–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5433.1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Conze T, Lammers R, Kuci S, Scherl-Mostageer M, Schweifer N, Kanz L, et al. CDCP1 is a novel marker for hematopoietic stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;996:222–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Méndez-Ferrer S, Michurina TV, Ferraro F, Mazloom AR, Macarthur BD, Lira SA, et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 2010;466(7308):829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shiratsuki S, Terai S, Murata Y, Takami T, Yamamoto N, Fujisawa K, et al. Enhanced survival of mice infused with bone marrow-derived as compared with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Hepatol Res. 2015 Feb 18; doi: 10.1111/hepr.12507. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Calzolari F, Michel J, Baumgart EV, Theis F, Götz M, Ninkovic J. Fast clonal expansion and limited neural stem cell self-renewal in the adult subependymal zone. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(4):490–492. doi: 10.1038/nn.3963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Johnstone SA, Liley M, Dalby MJ, Barnett SC. Comparison of human olfactory and skeletal MSCs using osteogenic nanotopography to demonstrate bone-specific bioactivity of the surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:266–276. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mayfield AE, Tilokee EL, Davis DR. Resident cardiac stem cells and their role in stem cell therapies for myocardial repair. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(11):1288–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mehrabi M, Mansouri K, Hosseinkhani S, Yarani R, Yari K, Bakhtiari M, et al. Differentiation of human skin-derived precursor cells into functional islet-like insulin-producing cell clusters. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2015;51(6):595–603. doi: 10.1007/s11626-015-9866-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fournier BP, Larjava H, Häkkinen L. Gingiva as a source of stem cells with therapeutic potential. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22(24):3157–3177. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Stock P, Brückner S, Winkler S, Dollinger MM, Christ B. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived hepatocytes improve the mouse liver after acute acetaminophen intoxication by preventing progress of injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4):7004–7028. doi: 10.3390/ijms15047004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mariano ED, Teixeira MJ, Marie SK, Lepski G. Adult stem cells in neural repair: Current options, limitations and perspectives. World J Stem Cells. 2015;7(2):477–482. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schroeder J, Kueper J, Leon K, Liebergall M. Stem cells for spine surgery. World J Stem Cells. 2015;7(1):186–194. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i1.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jia B, Chen S, Zhao Z, Liu P, Cai J, Qin D, et al. Modeling of hemophilia A using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells derived from urine cells. Life Sci. 2014;108(1):22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Singh VK, Kalsan M, Kumar N, Saini A, Chandra R. Induced pluripotent stem cells: applications in regenerative medicine, disease modeling, and drug discovery. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015;3:2. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2015.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Citro L, Naidu S, Hassan F, Kuppusamy ML, Kuppusamy P, Angelos MG, et al. Comparison of human induced pluripotent stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes with human mesenchymal stem cells following acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wheeler HE, Wing C, Delaney SM, Komatsu M, Dolan ME. Modeling chemotherapeutic neurotoxicity with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kuise T, Noguchi H, Tazawa H, Kawai T, Iwamuro M, Saitoh I, et al. Establishment of a pancreatic stem cell line from fibroblast-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:64. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lee G, Papapetrou EP, Kim H, Chambers SM, Tomishima MJ, Fasano CA, et al. Modelling pathogenesis and treatment of familial dysautonomia using patient-specific iPSCs. Nature. 2009;461(7262):402–406. doi: 10.1038/nature08320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Moretti A, Bellin M, Welling A, Jung CB, Lam JT, Bott-Flügel L, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1397–1409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Itzhaki I, Maizels L, Huber I, Zwi-Dantsis L, Caspi O, Winterstern A, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;471(7337):225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature09747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hanna J, Wernig M, Markoulaki S, Sun CW, Meissner A, Cassady JP, et al. Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science. 2007;318(5858):1920–1923. doi: 10.1126/science.1152092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wernig M, Zhao JP, Pruszak J, Hedlund E, Fu D, Soldner F, et al. Neurons derived from reprogrammed fibroblasts functionally integrate into the fetal brain and improve symptoms of rats with Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(15):5856–5861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801677105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ross CA, Akimov SS. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells: potential for neurodegenerative diseases. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(R1):R17–R26. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fujita J, Fukuda K. Future prospects for regenerated heart using induced pluripotent stem cells. J Pharmacol Sci. 2014;125(1):1–5. doi: 10.1254/jphs.14r01cp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]