Skip to main content
Disease Markers logoLink to Disease Markers
. 2015 Oct 22;2015:860628. doi: 10.1155/2015/860628

NRAMP1 and VDR Gene Polymorphisms in Susceptibility to Tuberculosis in Venezuelan Population

Mercedes Fernández-Mestre 1,*, Ángel Villasmil 1, Howard Takiff 2, Zhenia Fuentes Alcalá 3
PMCID: PMC4633561  PMID: 26578819

Abstract

Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (Nramp1) and the vitamin D receptor (VDR) are central components of the innate and adaptive immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and associations between susceptibility to tuberculosis and polymorphisms in the genes NRAMP and VDR have been sought in geographically diverse populations. We investigated associations of NRAMP1 and VDR gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to TB in the Venezuelan population. The results suggest the absence of any association between VDR variants FokI, ApaI, and TaqI and susceptibility to tuberculosis. In contrast, the NRAMP1 3′UTR variants were associated with susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection, as seen in the comparisons between TST+ and TST− controls, and also with progression to TB disease, as shown in the comparisons between TB patients and TST+ controls. This study confirms the previously described association of the NRAMP1 3′UTR polymorphism with M. tuberculosis infection and disease progression.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is the second cause of death worldwide among infectious diseases. In the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Tuberculosis Report for 2014 there were 9.0 million new TB cases in 2013 and 1.5 million TB deaths (1.1 million among HIV negative and 0.4 million among HIV positive), of which 218,875 new cases and relapses occurred in the Americas. In Venezuela, according to the WHO, the incidence of new and relapse TB cases is between 20 and 49 per 100,000 inhabitants [1]. The number of subjects infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is much higher, but the great majority of those infected are able to keep the pathogen under control and never develop the disease. Multiple evidence suggests that there is a genetic component involved in determining resistance or susceptibility to TB patients, who are infected but do not develop the disease and who developed the disease, but it is difficult to conduct genetic studies on susceptibility to infectious diseases because of the multifactorial influences of the host, the pathogen, and environmental variables that differ for each disease and even each individual studied. The association of host genetic factors with susceptibility or resistance to TB has been studied extensively using various methods including case-control studies, candidate gene approaches, and family-based and genome-wide linkage analyses that have revealed several candidate genes involved in susceptibility (reviewed in [2]). These studies have been performed in different ethnic groups, with large discrepancies between groups regarding the effect of the different candidate genes. Two of the genes that have shown the most robust associations are NRAMP1 and VDR.

In this study we investigated associations of NRAMP1 and VDR gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to TB in the Venezuelan population.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Subjects

The study included one hundred and ninety-five (195) unrelated and ethnically mixed Venezuelan individuals from the northern region of country, divided into two cohorts, patients and controls.

Patients. The ninety-three individuals all had a clinical diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and were seen by the Pneumology Service of the Hospital José Ignacio Baldó, Algodonal, Caracas. There were 52 men (56%) and 41 women (44%), with an age range of 17–70 years. Patients were selected based on the diagnostic criteria of the National Standard Integrated Venezuela Tuberculosis Control Program: two sputum smears positive for acid fast bacilli by microscopy, clinical symptoms characteristic of TB, and a chest X ray consistent with active TB disease.

Controls. There were one hundred and two apparently healthy individuals who were known to be exposed to patients with active TB. This group was composed of staff members who had worked at Hospital Dr. José Ignacio Baldó, Algodonal, Caracas, for more than 3 years, and included 25 men (24.5%) and 77 women (75.5%) whose age range was 20–67 years. The controls were classified according to the tuberculin skin test “TST” as follows: positive TST (51/102), negative TST (19/102), or without information (32/102). All controls were without clinical manifestations of TB at the time of blood sampling.

Individuals, who were HIV positive or known to have any autoimmune, chronic inflammatory, or other disease, were excluded from the study. Participants in the study signed an informed consent form previously approved by the IVIC Bioethics Committee.

2.2. NRAMP1 and VDR Genotype Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples according to the procedure described by Bunce [3]. The polymorphic variants of the NRAMP1 gene were studied by PCR-RFLP technique, using primers and restriction enzymes reported by Taype et al., 2006 [4]: INT4 (469 + 14G/C), D543 (codon 543, Arg → Asp), and 3UTR (deletion of TGTG in the 3′UTR, 55 nt 3′ to the last codon in exon 15). The polymorphic variants of the VDR gene were studied by PCR-RFLP, using primers and restriction enzymes reported by Curran et al., 1999 [5]: FokI, ApaI, and TaqI.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Allele and genotype frequencies were determined by direct counting. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was calculated with the exact test. The statistical significance of allele frequency differences between patients and controls was estimated by Fisher's exact test using 2 × 2 contingency tables. The Bonferroni corrected p values (p c) were obtained by multiplying the p values by the total number of variables analyzed and were considered significant when p < 0.05 [6]. Relative risk with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was calculated as odds ratios (OR) according to Woolf's formula [7].

3. Results

3.1. Frequency of NRAMP1 Polymorphisms in Patients with Tuberculosis and Controls

Table 1 shows the frequencies of NRAMP genotypes and alleles in controls and TB patients. The allelic and genotypic frequencies of the NRAMP1 polymorphisms showed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for INT4 (p = 0.832), D543 (p = 0.296), and 3UTR (p = 0.594) polymorphisms in the control cohort. There was a significantly increased frequency of homozygous 3UTR TGTG+/+ genotype in the healthy controls compared to the TB patients (79% versus 64%, resp., OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2478–0.9045, p = 0.01, p c = 0.03). However, the frequency of the heterozygous 3UTR SNP TGTG+/del (32.6% versus 21%, resp., OR = 1.8, 95% CI: 0.9452–3.4976, p = 0.03) and homozygous 3UTR SNP del/del genotypes (3.4% versus 0%, resp., OR = 8.13, 95% CI: 0.4143–159.6275, p = 0.02) was higher in the patient group than in the control group, although the corrected p values (p c) were not significant. In addition, there was a significant difference in the distribution of the allele frequencies (TGTG+ and TGTG del) between the controls and the TB patients (p c = 0.018). There was no significant association between INT4 and D543 genotypes with tuberculosis.

Table 1.

Genotype and allele frequency distribution of NRAMP1 gene in the controls and TB patients.

INT4 CC GC GG Total
Genotypes
Controls  (number of individuals) 14 45 39 98
% of total 7.49 24.06 20.86 52.41
% within condition 14.29 45.92 39.80
% within INT4 60.87 56.25 46.43

TB patients (number of individuals) 9 35 45 89
% of total 4.81 18.72 24.06 47.59
% within condition 10.11 39.33 50.56
% within INT4 39.13 43.75 53.75

Total 23 80 84 187
% of total 12.30 42.78 44.92 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 2.34   p = 0.3107   Cramer's V = 0.1118

D543 AA AG GG Total
Genotypes

Controls (number of individuals) 1 10 89 100
% of total 0.52 5.21 46.35 52.08
% within condition 1 10 89
% within D543 25 55.56 52.35

TB patients (number of individuals) 3 8 81 92
% of total 1.56 4.17 42.19 47.92
% within condition 3.3 8.7 88
% within D543 75 44.44 47.65

Total 4 18 170 192
% of total 2.08 9.38 88.54 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 1.27   p = 0.529   Cramer's V = 0.0813

3'UTR TGTGdel/del TGTG+/del TGTG+/+ Total
Genotypes

Controls (number of individuals) 0 21 79 100
% of total 0.00 11.11 41.80 52.91
% within condition 0.00 21.00 79.00
% within 3'UTR 0.00 42.00 58.09

TB patients (number of individuals) 3 29 57 89
% of total 1.59 15.34 30.16 47.09
% within condition 3.37 32.58 64.04
% within 3'UTR 100.00 58.00 41.91

Total 3 50 136 189
% of total 71.96 26.46 1.59 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 7.22   p = 0.0270   Cramer's V = 0.1955

Note. p: probability values; + = presence of TGTG; del = absence of these four bases; df: degree freedom; Cramer's V: measure of association between two variables.

3.2. Frequency of the VDR Polymorphism in Patients with Tuberculosis and Controls

Table 2 shows the frequencies of VDR genotypes and alleles in controls and TB patients. There was Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the genotype distributions of FokI (p = 0.074), TaqI (p = 0.066), and ApaI (p = 0.545) polymorphisms in apparently healthy individuals. The data showed that the frequency of the FF SNP genotype of FokI was higher in the patients than in the control group (36.6% versus 25.5%, resp., OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 0.9120–3.1109, p = 0.04) although the corrected p value was not significant. No significant difference in the allele frequencies was observed between the TB patients and the controls.

Table 2.

Genotype and allele frequency distribution of VDR gene in the controls and TB patients.

Fok1 ff Ff FF Total
Genotypes
Controls (number of individuals) 16 60 26 102
% of total 8.2 30.8 13.3 52.3
% within condition 15.7 58.8 25.5
% within Fok1 57.1 56.1 43.3

TB patients (number of individuals) 12 47 34 93
% of total 6.2 24.1 17.4 47.7
% within condition 12.9 50.5 36.6
% within Fok1 42.9 43.9 56.7

Total 28 107 60 195
% of total 14.4 54.9 30.7 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 2.81   p = 0.2454   Cramer's V = 0.12

Taq1 tt Tt TT Total
Genotypes

Controls (number of individuals) 1 38 58 97
% of total 0.5 20.8 31.7 53
% within condition 1 39.2 59.8
% within Taq1 33.3 53.5 53.2

TB patients (number of individuals) 2 33 51 86
% of total 1.1 18 27.9 47
% within condition 2.3 38.4 59.3
% within Taq1 66.7 46.5 46.8

Total 3 71 109 183
% of total 1.6 38.8 59.6 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 0.48   p = 0.7866   Cramer's V = 0.0512

Apa1 aa Aa AA Total
Genotypes

Controls (number of individuals) 18 54 29 101
% of total 9.5 28.4 15.3 53.2
% within condition 17.8 53.5 28.7
% within Apa1 47.4 56.3 51.8

TB patients (number of individuals) 20 42 27 89
% of total 10.5 22.1 14.2 46.8
% within condition 22.5 47.2 30.3
% within Apa1 66.7 46.5 46.8

Total 38 96 56 190
% of total 20 50.5 29.5 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 0.92   p = 0.6313   Cramer's V = 0.0696

Note. p: probability values; df: degree freedom; Cramer's V: measure of association between two variables.

3.3. Genotype and Allele Distribution of NRAMP-3UTR Variants in Patients with Tuberculosis and Healthy Controls Classified by the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST)

In order to investigate the possible influence of NRAMP1-3UTR variants in the development of tuberculosis, we compared the genotype and allele frequencies between the different groups: TB patients versus TST positive controls, TB patients versus TST negative controls, and TST positive controls versus TST negative controls (Table 3). There were statistically significant differences between TB patients and TST negative controls for TGTG+/+ (64 versus 94.7%, OR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.0126–0.7760, p = 0.004, p c = 0.012) and TGTG+/del genotypes (32.6 versus 5.3%, OR: 8.7, 95% CI: 1.1069–68.3801, p = 0.008, p c = 0.016). These same differences were conserved when the comparison was made between TST positive controls versus TST negative controls, although the significance was lost with the correction of p values. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the frequency of the TGTGdel allele among TB patients (OR: 9.0, 95% CI: 1.2010–68.2837, p = 0.005, p c = 0.010) and TST positive controls (OR: 5.0, 95% CI: 0.6330–40.2130, p = 0.046, p c = not significant) compared to TST negative controls.

Table 3.

Genotype and allele frequency distribution of NRAMP-3UTR in TB patients and healthy controls grouped according to the TST.

3UTR TGTGdel/del TGTG+/del TGTG+/+ Total
Genotypes
Controls TST+ (number of individuals) 0 12 38 50
% of total 0.00 8.6 27.3 36
% within condition 0.00 24.00 76.00
% within 3'UTR 0.00 29.3 40

TB patients (number of individuals) 3 29 57 89
% of total 2.2 20.9 41 64
% within condition 3.4 32.6 64
% within 3'UTR 100.00 70.7 60

Total 3 41 95 139
% of total 2.2 29.5 68.3 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 3.15   p = 0.207   Cramer's V = 0.1505

3UTR TGTGdel/del TGTG+/del TGTG+/+ Total
Genotypes

Controls TST− (number of individuals) 0 1 18 19
% of total 0.00 0.9 16.7 17.6
% within condition 0.00 5.3 94.7
% within 3'UTR 0.00 3.3 24

TB patients (number of individuals) 3 29 57 89
% of total 2.8 26.9 52.8 82.4
% within condition 3.4 32.6 64
% within 3'UTR 100.00 96.7 76

Total 3 30 75 108
% of total 2.8 27.8 69.4 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 6.97   p = 0.0307   Cramer's V = 0.254

3UTR TGTGdel/del TGTG+/del TGTG+/+ Total
Genotypes

Controls TST− (number of individuals) 0 1 18 19
% of total 0.00 1.4 26.1 27.5
% within condition 0.00 5.3 94.7
% within 3'UTR 0.00 7.7 32.1

Controls TST+ (number of individuals) 0 12 38 50
% of total 0.00 17.4 55.1 72.5
% within condition 0.00 24.00 76.00
% within 3'UTR 0.00 92.3 67.9

Total 0 13 56 69
% of total 0 18.8 81.2 100

χ 2 (df: 2) = 3.16   p = 0.206   Cramer's V = 0.214

Note. p: probability values; df: degree freedom; Cramer's V: measure of association between two variables.

4. Discussion

The aim of the present study was to look for associations between polymorphisms in VDR and NRAMP1 genes and susceptibility to infection and disease with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, as indicated by a positive TST, and the development of TB in the Venezuelan population. Vitamin D is an immune-modulator molecule that, via its receptor VDR, can modulate cytokine responses by T cells [8]. Although several publications have reported an association between the VDR polymorphisms and tuberculosis in different populations [826], our study, similar to others [2731], did not observe a significant association between the ApaI, TaqI, or FokI variants and susceptibility to either infection or development of tuberculosis.

Nramp1 (natural resistance-associated macrophage protein) is an integral membrane protein expressed exclusively in the lysosomal compartment of monocytes and macrophages. After phagocytosis, Nramp1 is targeted to the membrane of the microbe-containing phagosome, where it may modify the intraphagosomal milieu to affect microbial replication [32]. Some polymorphisms in the NRAMP1 gene appear to favor bacterial replication within macrophages and have been associated not only with increased susceptibility to infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis but also with an increased tendency to develop severe disease [3335].

However, different studies have found conflicting results. There was a positive association between the NRAMP1 gene 3UTR polymorphism and susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africans [36], Koreans [37], Chinese Han [23], and Chinese Kazak populations [38], but there was no association found in Taiwanese [39], Thai [40], Moroccan [41], Danish [42], Brazilian [43], and Indonesian [44] populations, and it was associated with resistance to TB in Cambodians [31]. The results presented here found that, in the Venezuelan population, the 3′UTR variants were associated with susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection, as seen in the comparisons between TST+ and TST− controls, and also with progression to TB disease, as shown in the comparisons between TB patients and TST+ controls.

The 3UTR polymorphism consists of a 4 bp TGTG deletion located 55 nucleotides downstream the last codon in exon 15 of the NRAMP1 gene, in a region where sequence variation can affect mRNA stability and/or efficiency of protein translation. Therefore, to explain the increased susceptibility promoted by the TGTG+/del genotype and TGTGdel allele, two essential aspects should be considered: (1) the protein encoded by the NRAMP1 gene plays an important role in the phagolysosomal function of pulmonary macrophages and in antigen presentation. The Nramp1 protein becomes activated and fused with lysosomes to digest the engulfed mycobacteria (reviewed in [45]); (2) Nramp1 pumps iron out of macrophages, thereby reducing iron levels within both the cytoplasm and the phagolysosome, rendering the metal less available for the iron-requiring intracellular bacilli [46]. As a consequence, a mutation or polymorphism in the NRAMP1 gene that results in a nonfunctional Nramp1 protein or decreases production of the protein could cause a reduction in Nramp1 function or even a complete absence of the protein. Decreased Nramp1 action could lead to increased bacterial availability of iron, thereby promoting mycobacterial replication within macrophages. Because the iron is also required by the cell to generate reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, the loss of Fe2+ ion transporter function of Nramp1 protein could increase availability of iron for intramacrophage bacteria and simultaneously weaken antimicrobial activity, thus favoring infection with M. tuberculosis and progression to tuberculosis disease. Furthermore, although elevated iron may increase susceptibility to TB, it may also predispose an individual to greater morbidity after TB has developed due to its role in generating ROS caused oxidative stress, which is greater in active TB compared with historical TB or healthy controls (reviewed in [46]). In conclusion the NRAMP1 gene 3UTR polymorphism might play an important role in the host defense to the development of tuberculosis.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the persons that participated in this study. This study was supported by CRP ICGEB Research Grant CRP/VEN11-01 and by FONACIT Project G-2005000393.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report, 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu F., Zhang W., Zhang L., et al. NRAMP1, VDR, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to tuberculosis among the Chinese kazakh population: a case-control study. BioMed Research International. 2013;2013:8. doi: 10.1155/2013/484535.484535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bunce M. Bidwell and Navarrette C. London, UK: Imperial Collage Press; 2000. PCR-SSP typing in histocompatibility testing; pp. 149–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taype C. A., Castro J. C., Accinelli R. A., Herrera-Velit P., Shaw M. A., Espinoza J. R. Association between SLC11A1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to different clinical forms of tuberculosis in the Peruvian population. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2006;6(5):361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Curran J. E., Vaughan T., Lea R. A., Weinstein S. R., Morrison N. A., Griffiths L. R. Association of a vitamin D receptor polymorphism with sporadic breast cancer development. International Journal of Cancer. 1999;83(6):723–726. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991210)83:6lt;723::aid-ijc4>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Svejgaard A., Ryder L. P. HLA and disease associations: detecting the strongest association. Tissue Antigens. 1994;43(1):18–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1994.tb02291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Woolf B. On estimating the relation between blood group and disease. Annals of Human Genetics. 1955;19(4):251–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arji N., Busson M., Iraqi G., et al. Genetic diversity of TLR2, TLR4, and VDR loci and pulmonary tuberculosis in moroccan patients. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2014;8(4):430–440. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Areeshi M. Y., Mandal R. K., Panda A. K., Haque S. Vitamin D receptor apai gene polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers. 2014;18(5):323–329. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Joshi L., Ponnana M., Penmetsa S. R., Nallari P., Valluri V., Gaddam S. Serum vitamin D levels and VDR polymorphisms (BsmI and FokI) in patients and their household contacts susceptible to tuberculosis. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 2014;79(2):113–119. doi: 10.1111/sji.12127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen C., Liu Q., Zhu L., Yang H., Lu W. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms on the risk of tuberculosis, a meta-analysis of 29 case-control studies. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083843.e83843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu Y.-J., Yang X., Wang X.-X., et al. Association of vitamin D receptor BsmI gene polymorphism with risk of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis of 15 studies. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066944.e66944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simon-Gruita A., Duta Cornescu G., Constantin N., Pojoga M. D., Saitan T., Stoian V. Apa I and Taq I polymorphisms of VDR (vitamin D receptor) gene in association with susceptibility to tuberculosis in the Romanian population. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 2013;8(1):7956–7962. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ates O., Dolek B., Dalyan L., Musellim B., Ongen G., Topal-Sarikaya A. The association between BsmI variant of vitamin D receptor gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis. Molecular Biology Reports. 2011;38(4):2633–2636. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0404-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marashian S. M., Farnia P., Seyf S., Anoosheh S., Velayati A. A. Evaluating the role of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on susceptibility to tuberculosis among Iranian patients: a case-control study. Tüberküloz ve Toraks. 2010;58(2):147–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gao L., Tao Y., Zhang L., Jin Q. Vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphisms and tuberculosis: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2010;14(1):15–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao Z.-Z., Zhang T.-Z., Gao Y.-M., Feng F.-M. Meta-analysis of relationship of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2009;32(10):748–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Merza M., Farnia P., Anoosheh S., et al. The NRAMPI, VDR and TNF-α gene polymorphisms in Iranian tuberculosis patients: the study on host susceptibility. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;13(4):252–256. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702009000400002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Olesen R., Wejse C., Velez D. R., et al. DC-SIGN (CD209), pentraxin 3 and vitamin D receptor gene variants associate with pulmonary tuberculosis risk in West Africans. Genes and Immunity. 2007;8(6):456–467. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilbur A. K., Kubatko L. S., Hurtado A. M., Hill K. R., Stone A. C. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and susceptibility M. tuberculosis in Native Paraguayans. Tuberculosis. 2007;87(4):329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lombard Z., Dalton D.-L., Venter P. A., Williams R. C., Bornman L. Association of HLA-DR, -DQ, and vitamin D receptor alleles and haplotypes with tuberculosis in the Venda of South Africa. Human Immunology. 2006;67(8):643–654. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bornman L., Campbell S. J., Fielding K., et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africa: a case-control and family study. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;190(9):1631–1641. doi: 10.1086/424462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu W., Cao W.-C., Zhang C.-Y., et al. VDR and NRAMP1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis among the Chinese Han population: a case-control study. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2004;8(4):428–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Selvaraj P., Chandra G., Kurian S. M., Reetha A. M., Narayanan P. R. Association of vitamin D receptor gene variants of BsmI, ApaI and FokI polymorphisms with susceptibility or resistance to pulmonary tuberculosis. Current Science. 2003;84(12):1564–1568. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilkinson R. J., Llewelyn M., Toossi Z., et al. Influence of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on tuberculosis among Gujarati Asians in west London: a case-control study. The Lancet. 2000;355(9204):618–621. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02301-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bellamy R., Ruwende C., Corrah T., et al. Tuberculosis and chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Africans and variation in the vitamin D receptor gene. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1999;179(3):721–724. doi: 10.1086/314614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sinaga B. Y., Amin M., Siregar Y., Sarumpaet S. M. Correlation between vitamin D receptor gene FOKI and BSMI polymorphisms and the susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis in an indonesian batak-ethnic population. Acta Medica Indonesiana. 2014;46(4):275–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Areeshi M. Y., Mandal R. K., Akhter N., Panda A. K., Haque S. Evaluating the association between taqi variant of vitamin D receptor gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Toxicology International. 2014;21(2):140–147. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.139791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kang T. J., Jin S. H., Yeum C. E., et al. Vitamin D receptor gene TaqI, BsmI and FokI polymorphisms in Korean patients with tuberculosis. Immune Network. 2011;11(5):253–257. doi: 10.4110/in.2011.11.5.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lewis S. J., Baker I., Smith G. D. Meta-analysis of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and pulmonary tuberculosis risk. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2005;9(10):1174–1177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Delgado J. C., Baena A., Thim S., Goldfeld A. E. Ethnic-specific genetic associations with pulmonary tuberculosis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;186(10):1463–1468. doi: 10.1086/344891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Canonne-Hergaux F., Gruenheid S., Govoni G., Gros P. The Nramp1 protein and its role in resistance to infection and macrophage function. Proceedings of the Association of American Physicians. 1999;111(4):283–289. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1381.1999.99236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Searle S., Blackwell J. M. Evidence for a functional repeat polymorphism in the promoter of the human NRAMP1 gene that correlates with autoimmune versus infectious disease susceptibility. Journal of Medical Genetics. 1999;36(4):295–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bellamy R. NRAMP and susceptibility to tuberculosis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2002;6(9):p. 747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bellamy R., Ruwende C., Corrah T., McAdam K. P. W. J., Whittle H. C., Hill A. V. S. Variations in the NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis in West Africans. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338(10):640–644. doi: 10.1056/nejm199803053381002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ryu S., Park Y.-K., Bai G.-H., Kim S.-J., Park S.-N., Kang S. 3′UTR polymorphisms in the NRAMP1 gene are associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis in Koreans. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2000;4(6):577–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wu F., Zhang W., Zhang L., et al. NRAMP1, VDR, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to tuberculosis among the Chinese Kazakh population: a case-control study. BioMed Research International. 2013;2013:8. doi: 10.1155/2013/484535.484535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liaw Y.-S., Tsai-Wu J.-J., Wu C.-H., et al. Variations in the NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility of tuberculosis in Taiwanese. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2002;6(5):454–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vejbaesya S., Chierakul N., Luangtrakool P., Sermduangprateep C. NRAMP1 and TNF-α polymorphisms and susceptibility to tuberculosis in Thais. Respirology. 2007;12(2):202–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.01037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.El Baghdadi J., Remus N., Benslimane A., et al. Variants of the human NRAMP1 gene and susceptibility to tuberculosis in Morocco. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2003;7(6):599–602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Søborg C., Andersen A. B., Madsen H. O., Kok-Jensen A., Skinhøj P., Garred P. Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 polymorphisms are associated with microscopy-positive tuberculosis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;186(4):517–521. doi: 10.1086/341775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shaw M. A., Collins A., Peacock C. S., et al. Evidence that genetic susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Brazilian population is under oligogenic control: linkage study of the candidate genes NRAMP1 and TNFA. Tubercle and Lung Disease. 1997;78(1):35–45. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8479(97)90014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nugraha J., Anggraini R. NRAMP1 polymorphism and susceptibility to lung tuberculosis in Surabaya, Indonesia. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2011;42(2):338–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hsu Y.-H., Chen C.-W., Sun H. S., Jou R., Lee J.-J., Su I.-J. Association of NRAMP 1 gene polymorphism with susceptibility to tuberculosis in Taiwanese aboriginals. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2006;105(5):363–369. doi: 10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60131-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nairz M., Haschka D., Demetz E., Weiss G. Iron at the interface of immunity and infection. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2014;5, article 152:10. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McDermid J. M., Prentice A. M. Iron and infection: effects of host iron status and the iron-regulatory genes haptoglobin and NRAMP1 (SLC11A1) on host-pathogen interactions in tuberculosis and HIV. Clinical Science. 2006;110(5):503–524. doi: 10.1042/cs20050273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Disease Markers are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES