Abstract
Disposable rake and reusable bristle type cytology brushes have been compared in 50 patients undergoing fibreoptic bronchoscopy for suspected malignancy. Forty seven patients were eventually found to have carcinoma of the bronchus. A diagnosis of malignancy was made from the specimens taken with one or other brush in 34 patients, from the reusable brush in 28, and from the disposable brush in 31. The specimens taken with the two types of brush were of similar quality. The reusable brush is about five times less expensive per procedure but carries a risk of cross contamination and cross infection, and time is needed to clean the brush after each bronchoscopy. The diagnostic yield appears to be at least as good with the disposable brush.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Esguerra A., Rambsy G. Transbronchial brush biopsy: clinical indications. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 Sep;100(3):403–405. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.100.3.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mak V. H., Johnston I. D., Hetzel M. R., Grubb C. Value of washings and brushings at fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Thorax. 1990 May;45(5):373–376. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.5.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pappas S. A., Schaaff D. M., DiCostanzo M. B., King F. W., Jr, Sharp J. T. Contamination of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopes. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Mar;127(3):391–392. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.3.391a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]