Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1991 Sep;46(9):669–670. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.9.669

Measurement of twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure: surface versus needle electrode stimulation.

A Mier 1, C Brophy 1
PMCID: PMC463370  PMID: 1948798

Abstract

The transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) generated during bilateral supramaximal phrenic nerve stimulation at 1 Hz from surface stimulating electrodes was compared with pressures obtained from needle electrodes inserted under local anaesthesia. Surface electrodes were used to obtain diaphragmatic electromyograms and magnetometers to monitor rib cage and abdominal configuration. Twitch Pdi was recorded at functional residual capacity in three normal subjects. Mean (SD) twitch Pdi in the three subjects during stimulation with surface electrodes was 19.4 (1.8), 22.5 (1.1), and 29.3 (2.2) cm H2O compared with 12.9 (1.5), 17:4 (1.3), and 22.6 (3.0) cm H2O with needle stimulating electrodes. Thus phrenic nerve stimulation with needle electrodes was more complicated and more invasive than stimulation with surface electrodes and resulted in lower transdiaphragmatic pressures.

Full text

PDF
669

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AGOSTONI E., RAHN H. Abdominal and thoracic pressures at different lung volumes. J Appl Physiol. 1960 Nov;15:1087–1092. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.6.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellemare F., Bigland-Ritchie B. Assessment of human diaphragm strength and activation using phrenic nerve stimulation. Respir Physiol. 1984 Dec;58(3):263–277. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(84)90003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hubmayr R. D., Litchy W. J., Gay P. C., Nelson S. B. Transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure. Effects of lung volume and chest wall shape. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Mar;139(3):647–652. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.3.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koulouris N., Mulvey D. A., Laroche C. M., Goldstone J., Moxham J., Green M. The effect of posture and abdominal binding on respiratory pressures. Eur Respir J. 1989 Nov;2(10):961–965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levy R. D., Nava S., Gibbons L., Bellemare F. Aminophylline and human diaphragm strength in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1990 Jun;68(6):2591–2596. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.6.2591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MacLean I. C., Mattioni T. A. Phrenic nerve conduction studies: a new technique and its application in quadriplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981 Feb;62(2):70–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McKenzie D. K., Gandevia S. C. Phrenic nerve conduction times and twitch pressures of the human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1985 May;58(5):1496–1504. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.5.1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mead J., Peterson N., Grimby G., Mead J. Pulmonary ventilation measured from body surface movements. Science. 1967 Jun 9;156(3780):1383–1384. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3780.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mier A., Brophy C., Moxham J., Green M. Influence of lung volume and rib cage configuration on transdiaphragmatic pressure during phrenic nerve stimulation in man. Respir Physiol. 1990 May-Jun;80(2-3):193–202. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(90)90083-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mier A., Brophy C., Moxham J., Green M. Phrenic nerve stimulation in normal subjects and in patients with diaphragmatic weakness. Thorax. 1987 Nov;42(11):885–888. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.11.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mier A., Brophy C., Moxham J., Green M. Twitch pressures in the assessment of diaphragm weakness. Thorax. 1989 Dec;44(12):990–996. doi: 10.1136/thx.44.12.990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES