Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2015 Sep 18;94(37):e1395. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001395

Folic Acid Intake and Neural Tube Defects: Two Egyptian Centers Experience

Mortada H El-Shabrawi 1, Naglaa Mohamed Kamal 1, Mona Abbas Elhusseini 1, Laila Hussein 1, Enas Abdallah Ali Abdallah 1, Yahia Zakaria Abdelalim Ali 1, Ahmed Abelfattah Azab 1, Mostafa Abdelazim Salama 1, Muna Kassab 1, Michael Krawinkel 1
Editor: Xiaolin Zhu1
PMCID: PMC4635794  PMID: 26376380

Abstract

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are a group of congenital malformations with worldwide distribution and complex etiopathogenesis. Folic acid plays a pivotal role in their prevention. We aimed to identify the protective effect of folic acid intake against NTDs and its dependence on different socioeconomic and environmental factors in a cohort of mothers in Egypt.

A cross-sectional study was carried over a period of 12 months on mothers who gave birth to babies with NTDs (group 1) and a control group with healthy offsprings (group 2). Both groups completed 2 questionnaires: food frequency questionnaire targeting the daily folate intake, and socioeconomic status and medical history questionnaire.

Both groups of mothers received folate <800 μg/day, recommended for pregnant women. A strong association was detected between NTDs and urban residency with medium educated mothers, with negative consanguinity, who had folate intake < 400 μg daily, and who had their food long cooked. Each of these factors separately had a limited impact to cause NTDs, but when present together they did augment each other. Interestingly enough is the role of fava bean, cauliflower, spinach, and mango in predisposing of NTDs in the presence of the above-mentioned factors.

The protective effect of folic acid intake against NTDs may depend on the synergism of different socioeconomic and environmental factors (which differ from country to another). In Egypt, females especially the medium-educated who live in urban areas should be well-informed with the value of folate intake in the periconceptional period.

INTRODUCTION

It has been estimated that neural tube defects (NTDs) affect > 300,000 pregnancies per annum worldwide being an important cause of perinatal mortality and infantile paralysis.1,2 Severe NTD (a meningocele) has been described in a 4000-year-old Egyptian infant mummy; however, the role of folic acid insufficiency as a risk factor for NTD was only recognized in the 20th century.3 Approximately 4500 of these cases occur in Europe, at a rate of ∼11 per 10,000 births in the UK and Ireland,4 with a similar rate in New Zealand.5 Although no precise figures on NTDs are available in Egypt, rough estimates of 4.26/1000 live born babies, and a relatively high incidence at Cairo University Children Hospital have been observed (unpublished data).

NTDs are unique in that the majority of cases are preventable by the adequate intake of folic acid before and during the first trimester of pregnancy.6,7 Internationally, this has led many governments to adopt guidelines recommending women to take ≥400 micrograms (μg) of folic acid daily during the periconceptional period and during pregnancy.8

In developed nations, almost half of all pregnancies are unplanned,9 representing a large proportion of pregnancies not amenable to effective supplementation.10 Furthermore, the uptake of folic acid supplementation is not universal among women who plan their pregnancies. The worldwide socio-demographic predictors of poor intake include young maternal age, minority or non-European ethnicity, and low education and income.1114

The life of children with NTDs is very difficult worldwide with a significant high burden of disease and associated costs on families and societies, which become much more magnified in a country like Egypt with limited public social support structures.

In developing countries like Egypt, it would be much logic and effective to apply the role of “prevention better than control” where the urge to estimate the problem of NTDs and its underlying factors including adequacy of folate intake and in turn settle local preventive programs. Accordingly, this research was designed on a cohort of Egyptian mothers to figure out the possible contributing sociodemographic and environmental factors leading to NTDs, and the preventive roles of periconceptional folate intake together with promoting attitudes toward healthy lifestyle. The result of such a research might help implement better preventive strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A case-control study was conducted in the outpatient and inpatient services of Cairo University Children Hospital, the biggest tertiary care pediatric hospital in Cairo, Egypt, and Benha University Hospital over a period of 12 months, January 2013 to January 2014, on a cohort of mothers who gave birth to babies with NTDs (group 1) and a control group of mothers who delivered healthy babies (group 2). We included only mothers whose infants ≤6 months old who agreed to participate in the study. Mothers of infants with NTDs associated other major congenital anomalies or syndromes were excluded.

Considering the 1 year time frame of the study and the availability of the cases in the 2 hospitals, the sample size was convenient.

All mothers were interviewed using 2 types of questionnaires as a retrospective survey. (1) Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for evaluation of their daily intake of folate from food/week assessing how often mothers ate different types of commonly available food during the periconceptional period of the corresponding pregnancy, and (2) socio-demographic and medical questionnaire along with questions about inter-family relationship and medicinal folate supplementation.

With the difficulty to recall the exact amount of the food taken, we classified the participants as: +ve meaning frequent consumers of commonly available foods and −ve meaning infrequent consumers of such foods.

The folic acid content of the frequently consumed common foods is estimated using the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard References.15

The study was approved by both hospitals review boards. A written informed consent was signed by the contributing women with full explanation of the study protocol and for the use of their data for future research.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was based on SPSS version 10.0 for Windows with Excel and Nutri-survey 2007. Parametric data were statistically described in terms of range and mean ± standard deviation (SD). Nonparametric data were described as frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. The comparison of parametric variables between the studied groups was done using unpaired Student t test. For nonparametric data, the comparison was done using the chi square (X2) test, Odd and risk ratios. Multivariate analyses were done using 2 steps first correlation matrix followed by regression analysis. The probability test was considered significant when P values were < 0.05.

RESULTS

The present study included 62 women with babies having NTDs and 118 control women with healthy offspring. Their age ranged between 16 and 43 with a mean of 25.7 years and 17 and 35 with a mean of 25.8 years, respectively. Their demographic data are listed in Table 1, where significantly higher weight was demonstrated among mothers of NTDs group. No significant differences were demonstrated regarding maternal age, infant's age, and daily folate intake which was in both groups less than the 800 μg recommended for pregnant females.

TABLE 1.

Demographic Data of the Studied Groups and Daily Folate Intake

graphic file with name medi-94-e1395-g001.jpg

The social, family, conception, and medical histories are listed in Table 2 and Figure 1, which highlight a statistically significant higher prevalence of NTDs in urban, medium-education, long cooking of food, and maternal diabetes. But strange enough, there was statistically significant low association between existing family relationship and NTDs.

TABLE 2.

Social, Family, Conception, and Medical Histories of the Studied Population and Folate Intake

graphic file with name medi-94-e1395-g002.jpg

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow chart of the study results.

Analysis of different foods taken by mothers with NTDs is demonstrated in Table 3 , which surprisingly reveals a significant association between intake of fava beans, cauliflower, spinach, and mango and occurrence of NTDs, whereas the consumption of oranges showed a protective role. Coriander had statistically insignificant low association between its intake and occurrence of NTDs only but statistically significant high odd ratio.

TABLE 3.

Prevalence of Certain Foods Containing Folic Acid in the Studied Groups

graphic file with name medi-94-e1395-g004.jpg

A multivariate regression for determining the most important determinants of NTDs is demonstrated in Table 4. Residency associated with low education, long cooking, maternal diabetes mellitus, overweight, and eating mango are the strongest determinants for NTDs. It highlights that NTD's occurrence is an environmentally multifactorial outcome resulting from the interaction of many variables, which separately and by themselves could not individually be the direct cause of NTDs.

TABLE 3 (Continued).

Prevalence of Certain Foods Containing Folic Acid in the Studied Groups

graphic file with name medi-94-e1395-g005.jpg

TABLE 4.

Multivariate Regression for NTDs Determinants

graphic file with name medi-94-e1395-g006.jpg

DISCUSSION

The present study reinforces the association between the occurrences of NTDs and a low intake of folic acid associated with socio–demographic–economic variables. Being a worldwide problem, many agencies worked on it. The United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services declared as 1 of the 2 major goals of the Healthy People 2010 initiative “to eliminate health disparities among different segments of the population.”1617 In addition, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States first authorized folic acid fortification of all enriched cereal-grain products in United States in March 1996 with the primary purpose of decreasing the number of pregnancies affected by NTDs, and the policy became mandatory by January 1998.18

Lynch et al19 have recently highlighted the importance of examining social disparities based on absolute risk measures such as the excess risk difference. All indicated that there is some evidence of socioeconomic differences in diet and nutrition. Lower income, lower educational attainment, and non-Hispanic black ethnicity are associated with lower intake of fruits, vegetables and essential nutrients, and higher intake of total fat in the United States.2021 The present study differs from the previous findings in the geographic distribution and education levels. This observation could be attributed to the fact that medium level educated mothers in urban Egypt are socially independent compared to those in rural areas with low education levels where families give help to young mothers.

In 2008, Stockley and Lund12 reported unplanned pregnancy and younger maternal age as important factors associated with low folic acid intake. This finding is very similar to ours: mothers with younger age and primigravida were found to be associated with a higher—though not statistically significant—occurrence of NTDs. One explanation might be that pregnancy was often unplanned and probably periconceptional folic acid supplementation was inadequate.

An interesting finding in the present study is the fact that the well-known strong extended family relationship in Egyptian rural regions and in low socioeconomic areas exerted a protective role against NTDs, which were found significantly more frequent in the control group.

Table 2 highlights 3 important factors having a predictive value for NTDs in the Egyptian population where the lambda was found to be highest at the level of education, followed by geographic distribution, and then by family relationship. This means that folate deficiency resulted from interactions of combination of the different predisposing factors. If present alone neither of them would have an impact on folate intake and subsequently on NTD risk.

Studies examining a potential link between the period between pregnancies and occurrence of NTD have found mixed results.22 NTD's risk does not appear to be related to subfertility,23 a finding that was not studied in the current investigation.

Recent work has shown that despite flour fortification, most women in this study have intakes of > 300 μg of folates but do not consume as much folic acid as to meet the Institute of Medicine's recommendation of 400 μg/day.16,24 As the European DACH-recommendations for the folate intake of adults have been lowered to 300 μg/day,25 the Egyptian mothers in this study met this recommended daily allowance (RDA). Still, the study supports the recommendation of an additional intake of 400 μg folic acid in the periconceptional period for reducing the risk of NTDs.

Women with diabetes are at an increased risk for having an infant with a birth defect. The results of several studies suggest that this increased risk applies to NTDs in particular2630 a finding that has been observed in the present study although the number of mothers with diabetes mellitus was too small for a conclusion. The present study revealed a statistically significant strong correlation between obesity and NTDs—a similar finding to that reported by other authors.3132

In the United States, many studies demonstrated that food folate is quite similar across racial/ethnic groups both before and after fortification whereas intake from supplements is dramatically higher in non-Hispanic whites.1,3334 These findings are supported by the present study which found an insignificant difference between folate intake from food by the mothers with offspring affected by NTD and the control group. However, as shown in Figure 1, the distribution of mothers according to residency and education level could exaggerate the impact of daily folate intake in such a way that 55.6% of medium-level educated mothers living in urban areas showed daily folic acid intakes < 400 μg, and 70% in rural areas. On the other hand, 54.8% of low-educated urban mothers showed daily folic intake <400 μg. In the rural areas, the respective figure was 52.3%. Despite being insignificant, it also points to the importance of combined effects, eventually in combination with the observed long cooking time and its role in the NTDs group.

One surprising, interesting finding in our study was that consumption of fava beans, cauliflower, spinach, and mango were observed more commonly in the NTDs group with mean odd ratios for NTDs of 0.13, 0.3, 0.27, and 0.21, respectively. That means that 1 in every 7, 1 in every 3, 1 in every 3, and 1 in every 4 mothers, respectively, will deliver a neonate with NTDs when eating these foods (Table 3 ). On the other hand, intake of orange and coriander was found to be associated with a lower NTD-risk (odd ratios 0.22 and 2.3, respectively, that is 1 in every 4 and 2 of every 3 neonates will be protected if their mothers ate these foods). Multicenter studies with longer duration should be carried out for deeper insight into these food peculiarities.

We did not find another study reporting the relationship between long cooking on the stability of folic acid in food. However, our study found higher prevalence of NTDs in the offsprings of mothers with history of long food cooking.

Despite the pivotal role of genetic factors in the development of NTDs,3537 it was beyond the scope of the present study.

One limitation in the present study is the possibility of the recall bias of the retrospective nutritional survey. Another limitation is that we were unable to collect information about income of the participants’ families due to constraints related to respondent burden.

CONCLUSION

NTDs’ occurrence is an environmentally multifactorial outcome resulting from the interaction of many variables which separately and by themselves could not be individually the direct causes of NTDs. These factors are different from country to another. The protective effect of folic acid intake against NTDs may depend on the synergism of those different socioeconomic and environmental factors. In Egypt, females especially the medium-educated who live in urban areas should be targeted towards promoting healthy lifestyle as well as adequate periconceptional supplementation of folic acid as a cornerstone in preventing NTDs.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: NTDs = neural tube defects, RDA = recommended daily allowance, USDA = U.S. Department of Agriculture, FDA = Food and Drug Administration.

Acknowledgment: to D Khaled R Elsabban, MD, Professor of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, for his extreme help and support in the production of this work.

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, and not-for-profit sectors.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mallard SR, Gray AR, Houghton LA. Delaying mandatory folic acid fortification policy perpetuates health inequalities: results from a retrospective study of postpartum. New Zealand women. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:273–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Health dimensions of sex and reproduction: the global burden of sexually transmitted diseases, HIV, maternal conditions, perinatal disorders, and congenital anomalies. Harvard School of Public Health, Global burden of Disease and Injury Series. Cambridge, Massachusetts:1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boano R, Fulcheri E, Martina MC, et al. Neural tube defect in a 4000-year-old Egyptian infant mummy: a case of meningocele from the museum of anthropology and ethnography of Turin (Italy). Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2009; 13:481–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Busby A, Abramsky L, Dolk H, et al. Preventing neural tube defects in Europe: a missed opportunity. Reprod Toxicol 2005; 20:393–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dalziel K, Segal L, Katz R. Cost-effectiveness of mandatory folate fortification v. other options for the prevention of neural tube defects: results from Australia and New Zealand. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13:566–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet 1991; 338:131–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.De-Regil LM, Fernández-Gaxiola AC, Dowswell T, et al. Effects and safety of periconceptional folate supplementation for preventing birth defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 10:CD007950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization. Standards for Maternal and Neonatal Care: Prevention of neural tube defects. www.who.int/entity/making_pregnancy_safer/publications/Standards1.5N.pdf (10 August 2011, date last accessed) 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010; 41:241–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tighe P, Ward M, McNulty H, et al. A dose-finding trial of the effect of long-term folic acid intervention: implications for food fortification policy. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 93:11–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ray JG. Efficacy of Canadian folic acid food fortification. Food Nutr Bull 2008; 29:S225–S230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stockley L, Lund V. Use of folic acid supplements, particularly by low-income and young women: a series of systematic reviews to inform public health policy in the UK. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11:807–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brough L, Rees GA, Crawford MA, et al. Social and ethnic differences in folic acid use preconception and during early pregnancy in the UK: effect on maternal folate status. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009; 22:100–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McGuire M, Cleary B. Sahm L, and Murphy D.J. Prevalence and predictors of periconceptional folic acid uptake—prospective cohort study in an Irish urban obstetric population. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:535–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research service. (2012). USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 25. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dowd JB, Aiello AE. Did national folic acid fortification reduce socioeconomic and racial disparities in folate status in the US? Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37:1059–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: U.S Government Printing Office; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Food and Drug Administration. Food Standards: amendment of standards of identity for enriched grain products to require addition of folic acid. Federal Register: 8781–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lynch J, Davey Smith G, Harper S, et al. Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60:436–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, et al. Neighbourhood differences in diet: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53:55–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Serdula MK, Coates RJ, Byers T, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake among adults in 16 states: results of a brief telephone survey. Am J Public Health 1995; 85:236–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Todoroff K, Shaw GM. Prior spontaneous abortion, prior elective termination, interpregnancy interval, and risk of neural tube defects. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151:505–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Whiteman D, Murphy M, Hey K, et al. Reproductive factors, subfertility, and risk of neural tube defects: a case-control study based on the Oxford Record Linkage Study Register. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152:823–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang Q-H, Carter HK, Mulinare J, et al. Race-ethnicity differences in folic acid intake in women of childbearing age in the United States after folic acid fortification: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2002. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85:1409–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Krawinkel MB, Strohm D, Weissenborn A, et al. Revised D-A-CH intake recommendations for folate: how much is needed? Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68:719–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Janssen PA, Rothman I, Schwartz SM. Congenital malformations in newborns of women with established and gestational diabetes in Washington State. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1996; 10:52–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramos-Arroyo MA. Birth defects in twins: study in a Spanish population. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1991; 40:337–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.CRC Press Boston, Little L, Elwood JM, Kiley M. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology 1991. 251–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Becerra JE, Khoury MJ, Cordero JF, et al. Diabetes mellitus during pregnancy and the risks for specific birth defects: a population-based case-control study. Pediatrics 1990; 85:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Myrianthopoulos NC, Melnick M. Studies in neural tube defects I. Epidemiologic and etiologic aspects. Am J Med Genet 1987; 26:783–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Watkins ML, Scanlon KS, Mulinare J, et al. Is maternal obesity a risk factor for anencephaly and spina bifida? Epidemiology 1996; 7:507–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Werler MM, Louik C, Shapiro S, et al. Prepregnant weight in relation to risk of neural tube defects. JAMA 1996; 275:1089–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heseker HB, Mason JB, Selhub J, et al. Not all cases of neural-tube defect can be prevented by increasing the intake of folic acid. Br J Nutr 2009; 102:173–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sever LE. Looking for causes of neural tube defects: where does the environment fit in? Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103 Suppl 6:165–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kibar Z, Torban E, McDearmid JR, et al. Mutations in VANGL1 associated with neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang XW, Luo YL, Wang W, et al. Association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and neural tube defect susceptibility: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:251e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Copp AJ, Stanier P, Greene ND. Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES