Abstract
The present study was performed to determine the infection status of swamp eels with Gnathostoma sp. larvae in Myanmar. We purchased total 37 Asian swamp eels, Monopterus albus, from a local market in Yangon in June and December 2013 and 2014. All collected eels were transferred with ice to our laboratory and each of them was examined by the artificial digestion technique. A total of 401 larval gnathostomes (1-96 larvae/eel) were detected in 33 (89.2%) swamp eels. Most of the larvae (n=383; 95.5%) were found in the muscle. The remaining 18 larvae were detected in the viscera. The advanced third-stage larvae (AdL3) were 2.3-4.4 mm long and 0.25-0.425 mm wide. The characteristic head bulb (0.093 × 0.221 mm in average size) with 4 rows of hooklets, muscular long esophagus (1.025 mm), and 2 pairs of cervical sacs (0.574 mm) were observed by light microscopy. The average number of hooklets in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rows was 41, 45, 48, and 51, respectively. As scanning electron microscopic findings, the characteristic 4-5 rows of hooklets on the head bulb, a cervical papilla, tegumental spines regularly arranged in the transverse striations, and an anus were well observed. Based on these morphological characters, they were identified as the AdL3 of Gnathostoma spinigerum. By the present study, it has been confirmed for the first time that Asian swamp eels, M. albus, from Yangon, Myanmar are heavily infected with G. spinigerum larvae.
Keywords: Gnathostoma spinigerum, advanced 3rd-stage larva (AdL3), Asian swamp eel, Monopterus albus, Yangon, Myanmar
INTRODUCTION
Nematodes of the genus Gnathostoma are clinically important as etiologic agents of foodborne parasitic zoonoses in humans [1]. More than 20 species have been reported in this genus from various parts of the world; however, about 13 species are currently recognized as valid ones. Among them, 6 species, namely, G. spinigerum, G. binucleatum, G. doloresi, G. hispidum, G. malaysiae, and G. nipponicum have been reported to infect humans. G. spinigerum is the type species and the main cause of human infections, which was first documented in 1836 in Thailand [1,2]. Gnathostomiasis, infection due to Gnathostoma spp. larvae, is clinically characterized as creeping eruption in subcutaneous and intermuscular tissues by migrating larvae. Occasionally, the larvae are also known to invade the lungs, eyes, and even the brain [1,2].
In the Union of Myanmar (Myanmar), human gnathostomiasis is rare whereas it is highly prevalent in Thailand, a neighboring country of Myanmar. Only a few reports have been available on human gnathostomiasis in Myanmar since 2 ocular cases were described in 1960 and 1968 [3,4]. Two cases of subcutaneous tissue infections in 2 Japanese men who visited Myanmar were reported; they had eaten raw freshwater shrimps [5]. Subsequently, an outbreak of human gnathostomiasis due to G. spinigerum was reported among 60 Korean immigrants who consumed raw freshwater fish in Yangon [6]. In addition, a case of cutaneous gnathostomiasis was described in a French traveler as an imported case from Myanmar to France [7]. On the other hand, studies on larval gnathostome infections in the second intermediate host were undertaken only 2 times in fish hosts in Myanmar [6,8]. Thus, we carried out to know the infection status of Gnathostoma larvae in Asian swamp eels, which have been known to be a most susceptible fish host, purchased in a local fish market of Yangon, Myanmar.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 37 Asian swamp eels, Monopterus albus, were purchased in a local fish market of Yangon in June and December 2013 and 2014. They were transferred with ice to the laboratory of the Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea and measured the length and weight of the fish (Tables 1, 2). Individual fish was ground finely with a mortar with a pestle or a grinder, and the ground fish meat was mixed with artificial gastric juice followed by incubation at 36˚C for 2 hr. The digested material was filtered through a sieve (5×5 mm of mesh), and washed with 0.85% saline until the supernatant became clear. The sediment was carefully examined under a stereomicroscope, and then gnathostome larvae were collected. Some of the larvae were fixed with 10% hot formalin and mounted with glycerin-jelly after clearing in alcohol-glycerin solution to observe the morphological characteristics.
Table 1.
Swamp eel | Length of eel (cm) | Weight of eel (g) | No. of larvae detected in |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Muscle | Viscera | Total | |||
1 | 84 | 451 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
2 | 80 | 480 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
3 | 75 | 362 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
4 | 62 | 284 | 90 | 6 | 96 |
5 | 60 | 200 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
6 | 59 | 298 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
7 | 57 | 204 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
8 | 54 | 180 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
9 | 54 | 195 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 50 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 46 | 94 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
12 | 45 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13 | 43 | 95 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
14 | 43 | 83 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
15 | 41 | 78 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
16 | 40 | 77 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
17 | 39 | 68 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Total | 55 | 198 | 171 | 6 | 177 |
The sum-up data of 2013 and 2014 are presented at the footnote of Table 2.
Table 2.
Swamp eel | Length of eel (cm) | Weight of eel (g) | No. of larvae detected in |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Muscle | Viscera | Total | |||
1 | 60 | 177 | 74 | 3 | 77 |
2 | 58 | 192 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
3 | 55 | 151 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
4 | 53 | 157 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
5 | 53 | 111 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
6 | 51 | 159 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
7 | 51 | 146 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
8 | 50 | 105 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
9 | 50 | 111 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
10 | 42 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 51 | 146 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
12 | 50 | 104 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
13 | 48 | 109 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
14 | 47 | 102 | 30 | 2 | 32 |
15 | 46 | 120 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
16 | 46 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
17 | 45 | 91 | 16 | 1 | 17 |
18 | 45 | 89 | 26 | 3 | 29 |
19 | 44 | 89 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
20 | 41 | 86 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Total | 49 | 122 | 212 | 12 | 224 |
Summing-up the data in 2013 (Table 1) and 2014, a total of 401 gnathostome larvae were detected from 33 infected eels (12.2 larvae/eel); 383 (95.5%) were detected in muscles and 18 (4.5$) were in viscera. The mean length of the eels was 52 cm and the mean weight was 157 g.
To observe the surface ultrastructure of gnathostome larvae, some worms were washed several times in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4˚C. After washing 3 times with the same buffer, they were dehydrated through a graded alcohol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and absolute alcohol), dried in a critical point dryer, coated with gold in the JFC-1100E ion sputtering device (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), and observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Philips XL-30S, Amsterdam, Netherlands) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV.
RESULTS
A total of 401 larval gnathostomes (1-96 larvae/eel) were detected in 33 (89.2%) of 37 swamp eels examined. Most of them (383 larvae: 95.5%) were found in the muscle. The remaining 18 larvae (4.5%) were detected in the viscera (Tables 1, 2). The average number of larvae was 12.2 per infected eel. The infection status by the surveyed year (season) is shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Month & year examined | No.of eels examined | No. (%) of eels infected | No. of larvae detected |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Range | Average | |||
June 2013 | 10 | 7 (70.0) | 160 | 1-96 | 22.9 |
December 2013 | 7 | 7 (100) | 17 | 1-4 | 2.4 |
June 2014 | 10 | 9 (90.0) | 134 | 1-77 | 14.9 |
December 2014 | 10 | 10 (100) | 90 | 1-32 | 9.0 |
Total | 37 | 33 (89.2) | 401 | 1-96 | 12.2 |
The early 3rd-stage larvae (EL3) were 0.85-1.375 mm in length and 0.095-0.15 mm in width. They had a characteristic head bulb (0.050×0.115 mm in average size) with 4 rows of hooklets, a muscular long esophagus (0.25-0.38 mm in length), and 2 pairs of cervical sacs (0.195-0.305 mm in length). The average number of hooklets in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rows was 32, 35, 39, and 42, respectively (Fig. 1A) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Organs | EL3 | AdL3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Body | Length | 0.850-1.375 (1.102) | 2.300-4.400 (3.347) |
Width | 0.095-0.150 (0.132) | 0.250-0.425 (0.366) | |
Esophagus | Length | 0.250-0.380 (0.331) | 0.630-1.220 (1.025) |
Cervical sac | Length | 0.195-0.305 (0.237) | 0.330-0.750 (0.574) |
Head bulb | Length | 0.035-0.065 (0.050) | 0.075-0.115 (0.093) |
Width | 0.085-0.150 (0.115) | 0.165-0.250 (0.221) | |
No. of hooklets on the head bulb | 1st row | 30-34 (32) | 38-44 (41) |
2nd row | 34-38 (35) | 42-50 (45) | |
3rd row | 36-42 (39) | 44-52 (48) | |
4th row | 38-44 (42) | 48-54 (51) |
Total 8 early 3rd-stage larvae (EL3) and 29 advanced 3rd-stage larvae (AdL3) were measured.
The advanced 3rd-stage larvae (AdL3) were 2.3-4.4 mm long and 0.25-0.425 mm wide. They had a characteristic head bulb (0.093×0.221 mm in average size) with 4 rows (rarely 5 rows) of hooklets, a muscular long esophagus (0.63-1.22 mm long), and 2 pairs of cervical sacs (0.33-0.75 mm long). The average number of hooklets in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th row was 41, 45, 48, and 51, respectively (Fig. 1B, C) (Table 4).
In SEM observations, AdL3 possessed a characteristic head bulb with 4 transverse rows of hooklets and cuticular spines on the transverse striations of body surface (Fig. 2A). A pair of lips was located at the anterior end of the body. The hooklets on the head bulb were somewhat curved posteriorly and had a sharp-pointed end. A cervical papilla was located between the 9th and 10th transverse striations (Fig. 2B, C). Cuticular spines with a sharp point were regularly arranged on the transverse striations, and they were densely distributed on the body surface of the anterior part and gradually decreased in size and number posteriorly (Fig. 2D, E). Near the posterior end of larvae, smaller cuticular spines were more sparsely distributed and an anus was seen (Fig. 2F).
DISCUSSION
The Asian swamp eel, M. albus, has been frequently examined as a susceptible fish host of G. spinigerum in Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand and Vietnam, and even in USA [10-15]. Sieu et al. [10] surveyed on the prevalence and intensity of G. spinigerum AdL3 in wild swamp eels collected monthly from 2 localities of Vietnam, i.e., Long An Province and Hoc Mon District of Ho Chi Minh City. Saksirisampant and Thanomsub [11] examined total 1,420 livers of swamp eels from a farm (1,037 eels) in Aranyaprathet District, Sa Kaeo Province, Thailand and those (383 wild-caught eels) from Min Buri District, Bangkok, Thailand. Cole et al. [15] investigated 47 imported swamp eels purchased in fish markets and 67 wild-caught specimens in USA. In Myanmar, there has been no study on larval gnathostome infections in swamp eels. Instead, small scale surveys to determine the source of human infections was performed 2 times on other kinds of fish, i.e., catfish, freshwater bream (Tilapia sp.), and snakeheads [6,8]. Accordingly, it has been confirmed for the first time in this study that Asian swamp eels, M. albus, from Yangon, Myanmar are heavily infected with G. spinigerum larvae.
We examined only 37 swamp eels collected in a local fish market of Yangon through 4 different times in June and December 2013 and 2014. Because of limitation in transportation of fish specimens with ice from Myanmar to Korea, we could not investigate an enough number of fish for 2 years. Therefore, we were unable to see the seasonal infection trend of larval gnathostomes in Asian swamp eels in Myanmar. However, we could see that the prevalence was higher in December and the infection intensity was higher in June. In Vietnam, it is known that both the prevalence and infection intensity were higher during the latter part of the rainy season (August-October) in Vietnam [9], and in August in Thailand [11,12]. The discrepancy between the prevalence and infection intensity may have been caused by the small number of fish examined in this study. Further studies should be performed to know the seasonal prevalence and endemicity of gnathostome infections in Asian swamp eels from Myanmar.
The species determination of larval Gnathostoma (AdL3) is mainly dependent on the number and distribution of hooklets on the head bulb. In the case of G. spinigerum, the number of hooklets in each row is more than 40 and reveals an increasing trend posteriorly [1]. In our specimens, the average number of hooklets on the head bulb was 41, 45, 48, and 51, and the larval gnathostomes were identified as the AdL3 of G. spinigerum.
In the present study, 401 (12.2 per fish infected) larval gnathostomes were detected from 33 (89.2%) swamp eels. Sieu et al. [10] detected 1,008 (8.1 per infected fish) larvae in 125 (4.4%) out of 2,830 wild swamp eels collected in 2 localities, i.e., Long An province and Hoc Mon district of Ho Chi Minh City, southern Vietnam. Saksirisampant and Thanomsub [11] harvested 674 (3.7 per infected fish) larvae in 184 (13.0%) out of 1,420 livers of swamp eels from a farm (1,037 eels) in Aranyaprathet District, Sa Kaeo Province and those (383 wildcaught eels) from Min Buri District, Bangkok, Thailand. Cole et al. [15] found 36 live AdL3 of G. spinigerum in 13 (27.7%) out of 47 swamp eels which were imported to USA. The prevalence and intensity of infections are much higher in swamp eels from Myanmar than in those from Vietnam and Thailand, and even in imported ones to USA. Based on aforementioned findings, there is a potential risk of human gnathostomiasis in Myanmar if improperly cooked freshwater fish, especially Asian swamp eels, are consumed.
The predilection site of G. spinigerum larvae is known to be the liver of swamp eels. So, some workers in Thailand examined only the livers of swamp eels to evaluate the endemicity of larval G. spinigerum infections [11-14]. Rojekittikhun et al. [12] reported the distribution pattern of G. spinigerum larvae in the livers and muscles of swamp eels. They recovered 57.0% of the total number of larvae (n=5,532) in the livers of 555 eels infected, and 43.0% in the muscles. Cole et al. [15] recovered total 36 G. spinigerum larvae from 47 Asian swamp eels imported to USA. Among them, 21 (58.3%) were collected in the liver, 7 (19.4%) in the muscle, 5 (13.8%) in the gastrointestinal tract, and 3 (8.3%) in kidneys. However, in the present study, most of the larvae (95.5%) were found in the muscles of eels, and the remainder (4.5%) was detected in the viscera. At any rate, although the liver is a predilection site of G. spinigerum larvae in swamp eels, it seems less reasonable that epidemiological investigations were performed only on livers for surveys on the infection status of G. spinigerum larvae in swamp eels.
As the second intermediate or paratenic hosts (the source of human infection) of G. spinigerum, several species of fish including the swamp eel, 3 crab spp., 8 amphibian spp., 5 snake spp., 23 bird spp., and 6 mammalian spp. have been reported in the literature [1]. Regarding larval gnathostome infections in Myanmar, Chai et al. [6] examined 10 freshwater fish, including 6 catfish, 3 Tilapia sp., and 1 snakehead to reveal the source of human infections in Yangon, Myanmar. They recovered 2 AdL3 of G. spinigerum in 2 of 6 catfish. Jung et al. [8] collected 2 AdL3 of G. spinigerum in 1 out of 15 snakeheads, Channa striatus, from a local market in a suburban area of Naypyidaw, Myanmar. Accordingly, 3 species of fish, i.e., Parasilurus sp. (catfish), C. striatus (snakehead), and M. albus (Asian swamp eels), have been confirmed to be the second intermediate or paratenic host of G. spinigerum in Myanmar. Other possible intermediate or paratenic hosts including susceptible fish should be systematically examined in the near future in Myanmar. People having the food habit to consume raw or undercooked flesh of fish like Korean and Japanese should pay attention to gnathostome infections in Myanmar.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jung-A Kim and Hee-Joo Kim, Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea, for their help in the examination of fish. We also thank members of Korea Association of Health Promotion (KAHP) participated in the Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA) NGO Project: Health Promotion Project for the Elementary School Children in Yangon, Myanmar (2013-2015).
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest concerning the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES
- 1.Miyazaki I. Section III. Nematode Zoonoses. 33. Gnathostomiasis. An Illustrated Book of Helminthic Zoonoses. Tokyo, Japan: International Medical Foundation of Japan; 1991. pp. 368–409. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Herman JS, Chiodini PL. Gnathostomiasis, another emerging imported disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:484–492. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00003-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gyi K. Intra-ocular gnathostomiasis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1960;44:42–45. doi: 10.1136/bjo.44.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khin T. Intra-ocular gnathostomiasis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968;52:57–60. doi: 10.1136/bjo.52.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nomura Y, Nagakura K, Kagei N, Tsutsumi Y, Araki K. M. Gnathostomiasis possibly caused by Gnathostoma malaysiae. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2000;25:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chai JY, Han ET, Shin EH, Park JH, Chu JP, Hirota M, Nakamura F, Nawa Y. An outbreak of gnathostomiasis among Korean emigrants in Myanmar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:67–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Develoux M, Dekumyoy P, Baygon E, Aractingi S. Imported gnathostomiasis acquired in Myanmar. Med Mal Infect. 2006;36:340–342. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2006.01.011. (in French) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jung BK, Lee JJ, Pyo KH, Kim HJ, Jeong HG, Yoon CH, Lee SH, Shin EH, Chai JY. Detection of Gnathostoma spinigerum third-stage larvae in snakeheads purchased from a central part of Myanmar. Korean J Parasitol. 2008;46:285–288. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2008.46.4.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sieu TP, Dung TT, Nga NT, Hien TV, Dalsgaard A, Waikagul J, Murrell KD. Prevalence of Gnathostoma spinigerum infection in wild and cultured swamp eels in Vietnam. J Parasitol. 2009;95:246–248. doi: 10.1645/GE-1586.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Le XT, Rojekittikhun W. A survey of infective larvae of Gnathostoma in eels sold in Ho Chi Minh City. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000;31:133–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saksirisampant W, Thanomsub BW. Positivity and intensity of Gnathostoma spinigerum infective larvae in farmed and wildcaught swamp eels in Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2012;50:113–118. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2012.50.2.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rojekittikhun W, Chaiyasith T, Butraporn P. Gnathostoma infection in fish caught for local consumption in Nakhon Nayok Province, Thailand. II. Seasonal variation in swamp eels. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;35:786–791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sugaroon S, Wiwanitkit V. Gnathostoma infective stage larvae in swamp eels (Fluta alba) at a metropolitan market in Bangkok, Thailand. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2003;33:94–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Saksirisampant W, Kulkaew K, Nuchprayoon S, Yentakham S, Wiwanitkit V. A survey of the infective larvae of Gnathostoma spinigerum in swamp eels bought in a local market in Bangkok, Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:191–195. doi: 10.1179/000349802125000295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cole RA, Choudhury A, Nico LG, Griffin KM. Gnathostoma spinigerum in live Asian swamp eels (Monopterus spp.) from food markets and wild populations, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:634–642. doi: 10.3201/eid2004.131566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]